120511 iasi morphology mr hendrik havinga
DESCRIPTION
Morphological challenges: morphological impact resulting from the demands of the individual interests. some Dutch examplesTRANSCRIPT
1
Morphological challenges: morphological impact resulting from the demands of the individual interests.
RESTORE – WORKSHOPPart 1
Sharing River restoration knowledge and experience in Europe,
Iaşi-ROMANIA, 9-11 May 2012
Hendrik Havinga
Rijkswaterstaat Oost NederlandDutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment
River restoration topics
• Goals (increase bio-diversity, WFD)• River functions• Current situation (natural river, regulated river, physics)• Restoration measures problems (challenges..)• Mitigating measures• Monitoring• Maintenance• Administration processes
The river and its user functions
Primary function
Added functions
Regulated River
The Waal River, NL
Bridge upstream city of Kampen, 1996
The Primary function(safe discharge of water, ice and sediment)
Discharge control at Pannerden Weir1993 flood in Waal River at Kekendom
Sedimentation in branch of Yangtze River in Dongting area
New levee after breach, Dongting Lake , 1998
Added functions
Current situation, Rhineexample
• Historical developments• Today
Istein
Rhine River catchment
The Oberrhein in early days...(at Istein)
Basel
View at Istein today..
Restrhein +
Canal d’Alsace
The OberrheinregulationR
egul
erin
g
River regulation German Oberrhein
Johan Gottfried Tulla
River training: also closing of side channels
Dike failure through ice dams(may very well start on shoals, at side
channel inlets)
River Regulation Measures
Measure Hydromorphological effect
Singular groynes (jetties) Width reductionDikes (Levees) “Normalisation “Bend cut-off River shorteningLocks and dams Sediment withdrawalDeforestation Sediment supply
leveegroyne
summerdikefairwayfloodplain
The regulated river
Why this lay-out ?
LAY-OUT PREFERENCES
Interest Geography Defenses HydrologySAFETYAG AINSTFLOODING
Summer dikesWinter dikesGroynes (ice)
"armoured"
rock
guarding max. design water-levels and dischargedistributions
NAVIGATION summer dikesDeep minor bed
"armoured"constructionsrock
up to 4,0 m waterdepth:total discharge through minorbed.
AGRICULTURE summer dikespolder dikesgrassno naturalvegetation
"armoured" no flooding
ECOLOGY summer dikes withinlets and outletssecondarychannelsNatural vegetation
"soft"constructionsno rock
frequent flooding
constructions
constructions
leveegroyne
summerdikefairwayfloodplain
The regulated river
Impact of levees, dikes and groynes ?
Bed
Water level
Width reductiontop view
Flow direction
longitudinal view
Bed
Water level
short term effects of width reductiontop view
Flow direction
longitudinal view
Bed level
Water level
Final effects of width reductiontop view
Flow direction
longitudinal view
Bed
Water level
Bend cut-offtop view
Flow direction
longitudinal view
A
A
B
B
Bed
Water level
Short term effects of Bend cut-offtop view
Flow direction
longitudinal view
A
A
B
BB
Bed level
Water level
Final effects of bend cut-offtop view
Flow direction
longitudinal view
A
A
B
BB
Bed
water level
Dam in the rivertop view
longitudinal view
Flow direction
Bed
Water level
top viewFlow direction
longitudinal view
Short term effects of dam in the river
Bed level
water level
Long term effects of dam in the rivertop view
Flow direction
longitudinal view
Side-effect of regulation works: increased flood levels
8000m3/s
4000
2000
0
MaxauΔQ = 1100 m3/sΔt = - 45 hr
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10t
Q
Maxau1882/1883
Worms1882/1883
1995
1995
Flood waveOberrhein
WormsΔQ = 1820 m3/sΔt = - 45 hr
• Dutch Rhine
Other side-effect: Bed degradation(Waal River)
sedimentation
erosion
turning pointz: 2 cm/year
dredging
Nijmegen
Erlecom
HaalderenHulhuizen
Pann. Kop
Tiel
St.-Andries
Dreumel
Gorinchem
DodewaardOchtenIJzendoorn
Ben. Leeuwen
OpijnenHaaftenHerwijnen
Zaltbommel
sea
leveegroyne
summerdikefairwayfloodplain
The regulated river
Regulation led to increase of flood levels and severe bed erosion
Also nature values have been harmed
Today’s major river projects in the Netherlands
• Room for the River Program:– Lower flood levels – Some 40 measures to increase flood conveyance (400 km)– Increase of landscape quality
• Natural vegetation, side channels– Ready in 2015– Budget € 2.3 billion
• European Water Framework Directive (WFD):– Good Ecological Potential– Only banks and floodplains can help
Overview of projectsites
Room for the River
Room for the River measures
Measures with ecological potential
WFD Project scope for central and eastern NL until 2015
95 ha floodplain lowering25 km secondary channel 2-sided 8 km secondary channel 1-sided60 km ecological river banks15 ha shallow reed zones41 fish passages
IJssel
Waal
L. Rhine-Lek
Budget 130 80 million €Postponement of measures after 2015
Many projectsExample IJssel River (120 km)
Restoration measures
Floodplains aggrade
Main channelsincise
Groynes narrow main channel and prevent lateral migration
Normalised Rivers : hydromorphologicalpressures
All large rivers are designated as heavily modifiedand can only to a limited part be rehabilitated
Types of measures for ecological improvementfor fish, macrofauna and waterplants
ThemeRestoration of habitats and natural
dynamics• Shallow areas, low flow velocity• Protected from waves from ships• Variation in conditions (substrate, flow
velocity, water depth)• Sandy banks with a gradual slope
Remove barriers for fish migration• Connect rivers and brooks• Connect fresh and marine waters
Clear and clean water
MeasureEcological banksConnecting lakes to riversConstruction of secondary channelsLowering of floodplains
Construction of fish passagesRehabilitation of mouth of brooks
Introduction of seeds of water plantsCreation of shelter by e.g. a dam
Ecological river bank
Actual
Plan
Erosion from ecologicalriver bank
Sedimentation in navigation channelConcern from navigation sectorMorphological study
Secondary channels Waal and Nederrijn-Lek
Gameren
channel AmerongseBovenpolder 5,8 km
VreugdenrijkerwaardMaintenance- Sedimentation in main and secondary channel- Vegetation
Fish passage Weirs Nederrijn
Mouth of brook
45
winde
Restore connection for fishmigration between rivers and brooks
Pumping station
Assignment
• Group divided in 4 subgroups– Discuss of your home situation, executed/planned
restoration measures and problems– Give short outline on flipoverflaps
• Results will be presented tomorrow• Possible rearrangement of content
Results of the assignment
Restoration measures problems(challenges..)
• Free banks• Side channels
Removal of bank defenses and re-introduction of side channels may present management problems
River restoration measures– Natural vegetation– Free banks – Side channels
Natural vegetation decreases flood protection
Example: longitudinal dam in groynefields (prevents erosion, increasesfairway) (Waal River near Opijnen)
Side channel through groynes = fish passage
Vegetation Development
Opijnen 1992
Vegetation Development
Opijnen 2003
Intervention and Monitoring
What is the right moment to intervene ????
Quality: flood protection level, sailing depth, stability, ecological potential,..
56
Historical bank erosion (by cattle and ships) was reason for bank protection
• Removal of rip rap, construction of new groynes
• Sandy banks, tolerated bank erosion• In time accretion in navigation
channel
photo: B. Boekhoven
IJssel Engelse werk
Removal of bank protection (right bank) at EngelseWerk (Zwolle) dynamic land-water gradient
21 m (12 m in 1995-2001)
28 m (8 m in 1995-2001)
16 m (16 m in 1995-2001)
February 2008
Engelse werk, 13 years later
Original bank
Increased morphodynamics
bank erosion by wave attack
sedimentation during flood
Initial outflanking of groynes
More various macrofauna communities
Side channel in the Klompenwaard (Waal River near bifurcation Pannerden)
Bakenhof dike set-back, Nederrijn River, 2000near bifurcation Westervoort
Impact on low water bed
First shoal
Aggradation of bend
Flood shoal Increased flood levelsHindrance to navigation
Plan Westenholte:Lowered flood plains + side channel
Morphological effects onmain channel (1/3)
elevation
(m+NAP)
flow velocity
(m/s)
gradualacceleration abrupt
deceleration
gradualdecelaration
abrupt acceleration
Morphological effects onmain channel (2/3)
flow velocity
(m/s)
gradualacceleration abrupt
deceleration
gradualdecelaration
abrupt acceleration
initial bed level changes
(m/day)
sedimentationfront
erosionsedimentation
erosionexpansion
wave
Morphological effects onmain channel (3/3)
initial bed level changes
(m/day)
elevation
(m+NAP)
erosion
sedimentationfront
sedimentationerosion
expansionwave
Gameren
Side channel(Waal River near Gameren)
Aggradation main channel as planned (2 dm, channel discharges < 3%).Local erosion at groyne roots and transfer zones undefended/defended banks
East channelWest channel
Large channel
Computed bed level respons Gameren(2 dimensional morphological model Delft3DMOR, repeated yearly hydrograph)
Deltares (former WL Delft Hydraulics, 2004)
Control principles for sidechannels
(from) MSc Study of Mr. Bhuban Ghimirestudent at UNESCO-IHE Delft (2003), titled:
“No-regret” solutions for intakes for side channels
River Waal
Secondary Channel
S control (local)
Q control (local)
X-section control (whole channel)
Quantity of Sediment Entering
Sediment Transport capacity
Channel Stability
Increasing sediment sizeIncreasing sediment size Increasing slopeIncreasing slope
Sediment loadSediment load
DegradationDegradation
Water dischargeWater discharge
AggradationAggradation
LaneLane’’s Balances Balance
Control principles..Control principles..
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛
W
sc
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛
W
sc
SS Deep
channel
Normal channel
Wide channel
Sediment transport capacities for different channel sections
CrossCross--section controlsection control
Transport capacityTransport capacity
Sediment distributionSediment distributionHydraulicHydraulic controlcontrol
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛
W
sc
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛
W
sc
SS
Sediment distribution
ΔS(Qcontrol)
⎟ ⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜ ⎜
⎝
⎛
W
scQ
Q
⎟ ⎟
⎠
⎞ ⎜ ⎜
⎝
⎛
W
scS
S
Sediment d istribution
ΔS (S control)
Sediment Sediment controlcontrol
Transp. Cap.
72
End of part 1