1/24 med bathymetry and vertical levels distribution group meeting 22 december 2015 agresti delrosso...
DESCRIPTION
State of the art Analysis of the BATHYMETRY CHECKPOINTS and corrections of 1/24 land-sea mask costal areas, especially: islands, straits, gulfs, lagoons, rivers delta and costal lakes; Matching between the the land- sea mask and the bathymetry (GEBCO), interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid, using the “seaoveland” routine; Minimum depth set to – 5 meters. Bathymetry data: -GEBCO (V 0a) -EMODnet (V 0b) 1/24 Bathymetry V 0.1 Bathymetry Checkpoints V 0.1 Landsea MaskTRANSCRIPT
1/24 Med Bathymetry and vertical levels distribution
Group meeting 22 December 2015
AgrestiDelrossoClementi
(towards V 0.1)
Valentina Agresti
1/24 Bathymetry
State of the art
Analysis of the BATHYMETRY CHECKPOINTS and corrections of 1/24 land-sea mask costal areas, especially: islands, straits, gulfs, lagoons, rivers delta and costal lakes;
Matching between the the land-sea mask and the bathymetry (GEBCO), interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid, using the “seaoveland” routine;
Minimum depth set to – 5 meters.
Bathymetry data:- GEBCO (V 0a)- EMODnet (V 0b)
1/24Bathymetry
V 0.1
Bathymetry Checkpoints
V 0.1Landsea
Mask
State of the art 2/2
Comparison between the T, U and V grids;
Test vertical levels distribution;
Bathymetry data:- GEBCO (V 0a)- EMODnet (V 0b)
1/24Bathymetry
V 0.1
Bathymetry Checkpoints
V 0.1Landsea
Mask
Matching between the the land-sea mask and the bathymetry (GEBCO) interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid;
Bathymetry data: GEBCO
A. Gibraltar Strait
B. Mar Chica
C. Boughrara Gulf
D. Nile delta
E. Bonifacio Strait
F. Ambracian Gulf
G. Malian Gulf
H. Thessalonikki
I. Croatian Islands
J. Gulf of Venice
K. Messina Strait
F
BC
A
D
E
K G
H
IJ
Analysis of the BATHYMETRY CHECKPOINTS: comparing the T, U, and V grids
Bathymetry Checkpoints
Analysis of the BATHYMETRY CHECKPOINTS: comparing the T, U, and V grids ARAKAWA C GRID
Matching between the the land-sea mask and GEBCO the bathymetry interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid.
Comparing the T, U and V grids
GIBRALTAR STRAIT
Matching between the the land-sea mask and GEBCO the bathymetry interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid.
Comparing the T, U and V grids
MAR CHICA
Matching between the the land-sea mask and GEBCO the bathymetry interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid.
Comparing the T, U and V grids
BOUGHRARA GULF
Matching between the the land-sea mask and GEBCO the bathymetry interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid.
Comparing the T, U and V grids
NILE DELTA
Matching between the the land-sea mask and GEBCO the bathymetry interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid.
Comparing the T, U and V grids
BONIFACIO STRAIT
Matching between the the land-sea mask and GEBCO the bathymetry interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid.
Comparing the T, U and V grids
MESSINA STRAIT
Matching between the the land-sea mask and GEBCO the bathymetry interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid.
Comparing the T, U and V grids
AMBRACIAN GULF
Matching between the the land-sea mask and GEBCO the bathymetry interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid.
Comparing the T, U and V grids
MALIAN GULF
Matching between the the land-sea mask and GEBCO the bathymetry interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid.
Comparing the T, U and V grids
THESSALONIKKI
Matching between the the land-sea mask and GEBCO the bathymetry interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid.
Comparing the T, U and V grids
CROATIAN ISLAND
Matching between the the land-sea mask and GEBCO the bathymetry interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid.
Comparing the T, U and V grids
CROATIAN ISLAND
Matching between the the land-sea mask and GEBCO the bathymetry interpolated on 1/24° of resolution grid.
Comparing the T, U and V grids
GULF OF VENICE
1/24 Vertical levels distribution (towards V 0.1)
Damiano Delrosso
6 different vertical levels distributions have been prepared:
Experiment name
No. levs hcr 1st T-level depth [m]
last T-level depth [m]
second-last T-level depth [m]
exp01n24 72 30 1.472 5334.648 5006.818
exp02n24 91 30 0.308 5313.555 5026.334
exp03n24 91 30 1.010 6602.963 6250.977
exp04n24 120 30 1.002 6534.993 6315.839
exp05n24 120 32 1.003 6530.764 6320.031
exp06n24 120 28 1.001 6539.597 6311.271
Two different ways to produce NEMO vertical grid are available:
1) Define: jpk
hsur
ha0
ha1
hth
hcr
Experiment name
No. levs hcr
exp01n24 72 30
exp02n24 91 30
2) Define: jpk
hth
hcr
Δzmin
hmax
The vertical location of w− and t−levels is defined as: z(k) = hsur − h0k − h1log[cosh((k − hth)hcr)]
Experiment name
No. levs hcr
exp03n24 91 30
exp04n24 120 30
exp05n24 120 32
exp06n24 120 28
LEVELS DISTRIBUTION ALONG DEPTH
BATHYMETRY MASKED FOR DEPTHS > 5500 M
LEVELS DISTRIBUTION ALONG DEPTH (ZOOM Surface-500m)
FURTHER WORK – Step 1
Move to NEMO 3.6 STABLE Post merge party (the latest stable release)
FURTHER WORK – Step 2
Run an idealized simulation in order to compare original NEMO 3.6 STABLE code using 1/16 and 1/24 horiz. and vert. Geometry (no MFS routines at this step):- analytical formulation- no bdy- no runoff- initial conditions (?) -> Seadatanet 1/24 are available as interpolation from 1/16 Seadatanet, but maybe we could build new I.C. at 1/24 using DIVA
- test vertical geometry at this step?
FURTHER WORK – Step 3
Run a realistic simulation in order to compare sys4e or V2 with NEMO 1/24.We need to produce:- weights for 1/8 ECMWF- bdy- runoff- initial conditions (?) -> Seadatanet 1/24 are available as interpolation from 1/16 Seadatanet, but maybe we could build new I.C. at 1/24 using DIVA
- test vertical geometry at this step?