130625_predisposition of householders dalila antunes

June 25th, Brussels

Sample

Cooking (cooking procedures, UCO storage and UCO disposal)

Preferences for collecting system

Barriers, Motivations and Facilitators for UCO recycling

UCO Recycling Profiles

Factor Social, [email protected]

Title 1RecOil Project

Sample

Survey developed on Greece, Italy, Portugal, and SpainInterviews to 877 households (all using oil or fat tocook)83,6% answers provided by womenAverage 46 years old (DP=4), i.e. 95% of interviewees38-54 years Average annual income (without taxes) of less than 15000 Euros (47.30%), followed by between 15 000 and30 000 (39.40%)



Sample

25.80% of the respondents referred that they have participated before in an UCO recycling system

before.

21.20% reported having an UCO recycling system in the area in which they live in.

40.90% Spain 36.60% Portugal 19.90% Greece 2.70% Italy



Sample







Fat usedhigh cooking oil consumption (98.60%), average of2.52 litres/month (SD = .29).

other types of fat (e.g. butter, margarine) (13% and.50% respectively). Consumed on an average of .63

Kg/month (SD = .06).





12,92%

30,19%

21,48%

0,38%

99,12%

15,21%

9,55%

47,76%

41,97%

1,88%

18,52%

75,83%

53,40%

37,48%

11,83%

30,11%

40,32%

0,69%

98,92%

9,03%

10,75%

41,40%

47,31%

1,61%

15,05%

83,33%

75,27%

56,45%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Oil storage - frying pan

Oil storage - glass jar

Oil storage - plastic jar

Other type of fat

Vegetable oil or olive oil

Butter, margerine or other animal derived fats

Both

Dips food in oil/fat

Uses a thin layer of oil/fat

Both happen

High % of residues in oil/fat after cooking

Low % of residues in oil/fat after cooking

Reuses oil

Filters oil

UCO collection system in the area No UCO collection system in the area

Disposal of waste vs Disposal of UCO

medium to high frequency of urban residuesrecycling by frequently separating them (M = 3.83;

SD = .30);

frequency of UCO recycling wasmedium, sometimes storing and disposing of UCOsin an appropriate facility (M = 3.03; SD = .34), with

this occurring mostly once per month (28.60%).

scale from 1 Never to 5 Always



Factor Social / [email protected]


0 20 40 60 80 100 120

1 X a day

2 or 3 X a week

1 X a week

2 ou 3 X a month

1 X a month

5 ou 6 X a year

2 ou 3 X a year

1 X a year

Portugal

Greece

Spain

Italy

Partner Contact Data (adress, phone, fax, email, etc.)


13,46%

18,81%

4,63%

46,89%

4,50%

6,22%

1,16%

0,58%

0,14%

0,14%

55,38%

7,53%

0,00%

6,45%

3,76%

11,83%

4,84%

6,99%

4,30%

1,08%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

appropriate facilities

garbage

public space/soil

domestic sewers

reuse to cook

another place collection system (other)

domestic collection system

another place collection system (supermarket, ...)

another place collection system (municipality)

another place collection system (restaurants)

UCO collection system in the area No UCO collection system in the area

Sample







Preferences for the systema high intention to adhere if the system providesdisposal facilities system (M = 8.69; SD = .08),

program with a door-to-door collection system (M =7.90; SD = .10).

disposal in supermarkets (M = 6.62; SD = .11); gasstations (M = 5.78; SD = .12); schools (M = 5.49; SD

= .13); municipalities (M = 5.35; SD = .12) and

restaurants (M = 5.15; SD = .12).

14.90% already recycle 13.60% will never be willing to participate

1 No intention at all to adhere -10 Certainty that would adhere



Preferences for the systemThe majority reported to be willing to participate butonly if it would be easy and practical (38.40%).

Others would be willing to participate even thoughthe system would be complex (33.10%).

1 No intention at all to adhere -10 Certainty that would adhere



Sample









,4

1,4

1,6

3,6

4,2

5,6

9,2

13,4

15,2

23,2

27,3

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Lack of interest in the issue

Never thought about it/not sensitized

Individual behaviour non-significant

Lack of incentives

Lack of knowledge

Disposal facilities always full

Lack of garbage container at home

Habit of non-recycling

High effort

Other

Inacessible disposal facilities

,61,21,51,5

2,72,4

3,78,79,0

10,916,817,5

24,536,0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Lack of interest in the issueIt is a "dirty" task

Not at home/spend little at homeLack of incentives

Oil is very dirtyHigh effort

Never thought about it/not sensitizedIndividual behaviour non-significant

Habit of non-recyclingLack of knowledge of what to do

OtherLack of knowledge of collection system in

Lack of knowledge of where to disposeInacessible disposal facilities

,82,6

4,04,34,84,65,7

8,910,611,2

16,617,2

60,4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Obligation/law

Feel good about myself

Personal responsability

Reduce ecological footprint

Habit

Civic duty

Environmental reasons



1,01,41,61,82,62,83,0

5,07,8

8,99,39,5

18,533,5

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

For future use as biodieselIndividual action makes a difference

EducationWorry about the water treatment system

Save resources for future generationsReduce ecological footprint

Feel good about myselfProtect the planet's future

UCO recycling motives - OtherPrevent damage to domestic sewer

Prevent water pollutionHabit

Reduce polutionEnvironmental reasons

Sample









Cluster/profile 1 UCO recycler

49.40% (n = 265)

Cluster/profile 2 UCO non-recycler

50.60% (n = 271)

Oil filtering (yes = 81.50%); Oil filtering (no = 98.50%);

Frequency of UCO recycling (M = 3.27) Frequency of UCO recycling (M = 1.26)

Oil reuse (yes = 84.10%); Oil reuse (no = 75.80%);

Willingness to participate in an UCO recycling program in the

area (Yes, I would be willing to participate even though the

system would be complex = 38%)

Willingness to participate in an UCO recycling program in the

area (Yes, I would be willing to participate but only if it would

be easy and practical = 46.80%)

Frequency of UCO disposal

(Once per month = 38.40%)

Frequency of UCO disposal

(Twice or three times per month = 18.90%)

Accessibility of biodiesel vehicles

(M = .48 vehicles)

Accessibility of biodiesel vehicles

(M = .14 vehicles)

Knowledge about UCO uses for producing soap (yes = 59%) Knowledge about UCO uses for producing soap (no = 69.40%)

Knowledge about UCO uses for producing biodiesel/biofuel

(yes = 53.90%)

Knowledge about UCO uses for producing biodiesel/biofuel

(no = 66.40%)

Well managed disposal facilities on public spaces

Information on system (location and procedures)

Information on environmental benefits and UCO uses

Preferably comunicate by TV, radio, newspapers




Dalila Antunes

Factor Social, Lda.

Email: [email protected]

Tel: +351 217816282 / +351 962564744

www.recoilproject.eu

www.factorsocial.pt

The sole responsibility for the content of this [webpage, publication etc.] lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EACI nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

Photographs used on this presentation were collected at Photogen.com website. Photos used are royalty free but subject to Photogen terms of use.

130625_predisposition of householders dalila antunes

Documents