2010 tobias ternent school of computer science · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written...

78
Exploring Electronic Standards For Ancient Nubian Remains A dissertation submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of MSc BioHealth Informatics in the Faculty of Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE

Upload: others

Post on 02-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

Exploring Electronic Standards For Ancient Nubian Remains

A dissertation submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree

of MSc BioHealth Informatics in the Faculty of Faculty of Engineering

and Physical Sciences

2010

TOBIAS TERNENT

SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE

Page 2: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

1

Contents

Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 1

DECLARATION......................................................................................................................... 2

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ........................................................................................................ 3

Dedication .............................................................................................................................. 4

Acknowledgement ................................................................................................................. 5

1 Introduction And Background ............................................................................................. 6

1.1 Project aims .................................................................................................................. 6

1.2 Exploration ................................................................................................................... 6

1.3 Nubian region ............................................................................................................... 8

1.4 Aswan Dams ................................................................................................................. 8

1.5 Ancient Egyptian time periods ................................................................................... 10

1.6 Literature Review ....................................................................................................... 11

1.6.1 Written Records .................................................................................................. 11

1.6.2 Electronic Patient Records .................................................................................. 12

1.7 Introduction Summary ............................................................................................... 14

2 Methods ............................................................................................................................ 16

2.1 Ontology Option ......................................................................................................... 16

2.2 Database Option ......................................................................................................... 18

2.3 Why an ontology ........................................................................................................ 19

Page 3: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

2

2.4 Written Information ................................................................................................... 20

2.5 Methods Summary ..................................................................................................... 21

3 Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 22

3.1 Ancient Nubian Ontology ........................................................................................... 22

3.1.1Site........................................................................................................................ 22

3.1.2 Person ................................................................................................................. 24

3.1.3 Diagnosis ............................................................................................................. 29

3.1.4 Medical Test ........................................................................................................ 30

3.1.5 Body Part ............................................................................................................. 30

3.1.6 Artefact................................................................................................................ 31

3.1.7 Medical Treatment .............................................................................................. 31

3.1.8 Time Period ......................................................................................................... 31

3.1.9 Publication Record .............................................................................................. 32

3.1.10 Religion .............................................................................................................. 33

3.1.11 Value Partition .................................................................................................. 33

3.1.12 Data Properties ................................................................................................. 34

3.2 OCR processing ........................................................................................................... 34

3.3 Analysis Summary ....................................................................................................... 34

4 Validation .......................................................................................................................... 35

4.1 Ancient Nubian content ............................................................................................. 35

Page 4: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

3

4.2 Ontological structure .................................................................................................. 39

4.3 Validation Summary ................................................................................................... 42

5 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 43

5.1 EPR Relevance ............................................................................................................ 43

5.2 Literature Key Aspects ................................................................................................ 44

5.3 Ontology complexity .................................................................................................. 46

5.4 Fit for purpose ............................................................................................................ 47

5.5 Limitations .................................................................................................................. 49

5.6 Conclusions Summary ................................................................................................ 50

6 Further Study..................................................................................................................... 51

6.1 Current work............................................................................................................... 51

6.2 System Implementation ............................................................................................. 51

6.3 Draft proposal ............................................................................................................. 53

6.4 Further Study Summary ............................................................................................. 54

Appendix 1 ........................................................................................................................... 56

References ............................................................................................................................ 73

Bibliography ......................................................................................................................... 74

Final Word Count: 16, 320

Page 5: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

1

Abstract

There are currently no real standards employed to put material concerning forensic

Egyptology as an electronic format. Examinations of ancient remains - mummies and

skeletons - are hidden away in physical reports, often from publication during early parts

of the last century. In comparison, there is a large push towards electronic records in

healthcare for patients to aid clinicians to become more efficient, and for studies to take

place. The aim of the proposed project is to explore the feasibility for constructing

electronic records of these ancient remains.

This dissertation outlines the material necessary to understand the scope of the problem.

The ancient Nubian region is detailed in relation to its geographic region, along with how

it has changed over the past century due to dam construction. In the healthcare field,

medical coding has been of high importance during the involvement of computers to

describe disease, prescriptions, and procedures. In addition, molecular biological

standards for the management of databases and meta data descriptions for experiments

have been defined in recent years.

Through the construction of an ontology to represent this knowledge, it has been

validated against experts of the field. Both good content and structural problems have

been identified, paving the way for potential further study through a PhD to implement a

software system and database, and to define a draft standard for capturing information

about ancient Nubian remains, electronically.

Page 6: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

2

DECLARATION

I declare that no portion of the work referred to in the dissertation has been submitted in

support of an application for another degree or qualification of this or any other

university or other institute of learning.

Page 7: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

3

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

The following three notes on copyright and the ownership of intellectual property rights:

i. Copyright in text of this dissertation rests with the author. Copies (by any process)

either in full, or of extracts, may be made only in accordance with instructions given by

the author. Details may be obtained from the appropriate Graduate Office. This page

must form part of any such copies made. Further copies (by any process) of copies made

in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the permission (in writing)

of the author.

ii. The ownership of any intellectual property rights which may be described in this

dissertation is vested in the University of Manchester, subject to any prior agreement to

the contrary, and may not be made available for use by third parties without the written

permission of the University, which will prescribe the terms and conditions of any such

agreement.

iii. Further information on the conditions under which disclosures and exploitation may

take place is available from the Head of the School of Computer Science (or the Vice-

President and Dean of the Faculty of Life Sciences for Faculty of Life Sciences’ candidates.)

Page 8: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

4

Dedication

I dedicate this dissertation to my late father, Dr. Thomas Ternent, who passed away

suddenly last year.

Page 9: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

5

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank my MSc course tutor, Prof. Andy Brass for his support and guidance

throughout. I would also like to thank my classmates Andrew, Mohammad, Sharvena,

Steve, and Pete.

My thanks also goes out to my family, close friends, and Manchester Tyrants teammates

who have helped me thoroughly enjoy this past academic year.

Page 10: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

6

1 Introduction And Background

In this section, the author will outline the aims of my project, and what exactly is to be

explored in the investigation as well as detailing background information regarding

ancient Nubia, studies performed regarding that region, and modern methods of keeping

health records.

1.1 Project aims

The aim of this project is to investigate how modern computer science could change the

way information is recorded and worked upon in the field of biomedical and forensic

aspects of Egyptology, of the Nubian region. Original investigations into human remains –

skeletons and mummies - found in mass cemeteries were carried out at the start of the

20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is

a renewed effort to re-examine the remains and reports as the capability of medical and

biological science has progressed greatly in recent years. For instance, DNA can now be

easily extracted and sequenced. The potential to analyse and form conclusions about how

the people of ancient societies lived and died is immense. There does not appear to be

any current major electronic infrastructure in place to store, retrieve, analyse information

about these investigations. A significant amount of medical information needs to be

stored and accessed, but doing so based solely upon physical written records is not

optimal.

1.2 Exploration

In today’s society, particularly in the UK, there has been a real push towards the use

computers for the medical sector. One aspect of this is the conception of the Electronic

Patient Record (EPR). Although designed to record current health information, this

Page 11: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

7

perhaps could be applied to ancient Nubian remains. Even though examinations of

remains may be more of a post mortem performed thousands of years after death, it may

be useful to record medical information as individual EPRs. Many aspects of an ancient

Nubian’s life could be determined, such as sex, height, weight, cause of death, existing

medical conditions, and previous medical history. EPRs to store all this information would

be useful as there are approximately 20,000 Nubian remains that could be examined.

Creating EPRs for all the remains could indeed lead towards analysis or conclusions that

were previously not possible by looking at various specific aspects across a larger

population.

The aim of this intended project is not to deliver a final system to support EPRs for

ancient Nubians. Such a system would take much longer to develop than the allocated

summer period for an MSc. Project. Rather, this project will explore and investigate to see

whether this application of EPRs is viable, feasible, and useful. Through the comparison

with the BioHealth Informatics field, it may also be possible to identify standards that

should be adhered to when recording forensic Egyptology experiments. If successful, this

project could become a platform to consult a future PhD research project, to actually

implement a system over the course of a few years. This proposed MSc. project could be

looked upon as a requirements gathering process as avenues of possibilities and

capabilities for the use of computers need to be explored.

The rest of this document shall provide suitable background information regarding my

MSc project. Areas will include the history behind ancient Nubia, and record systems from

the past and present. This background report is arguably unusual in the parent subject of

computer science, as the author will be delving into details of neither software algorithms

Page 12: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

8

nor hardware architecture. All the following information is indeed relevant in order to

understand, as a whole, what the problem is and how it is being addressed.

1.3 Nubian region

Nubia is an area of land running along the River Nile in southern Egypt across into

northern Sudan [1]. In order to define the region in question, most consideration should

be given to areas where the Nubian language is spoken. It has not been determined which

precise points this should cover as the Nubian region spans across two sovereign

countries today. The majority of the inhabitants live on the Nile valley as the river

supports life and trade. People generally have not spread out far into the dry surrounding

deserts.

1.4 Aswan Dams

Historically, since ancient Egypt, the Nile River flooded downstream every year at

summer, due to the large drainage basin around East Africa and its two main tributary

rivers, the White Nile and the Blue Nile. Floods brought large volumes of water, rich in

nutrients and minerals. These flood waters act as a natural fertiliser for the surrounding

soil. This watered, fertilised soil would then be capable of supporting intensive farming.

Farming a rich, large area of plants produces a lot of food. Since more mouths could be

fed, perhaps this meant reduced rates of child mortality. This abundance of food thus

enables the support for a larger surrounding population over time. The problem with this

scenario is around natural variances regarding the flood. If too much flood water passes

through, then crops may drown and die. If there is not enough flood water over a few

years a drought could be present. A drought would cause crops to die from desiccation.

Due either of the unfortunate circumstances, even entire crop harvests could be lost.

Page 13: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

9

Without enough food produced at the harvests, inhabitants would experience a famine

causing starvation, potentially leading to malnutrition or death. To avoid these cases, it

would be beneficial if a dam was implemented in order to form a reservoir. Water would

be stored, and released in a controlled way [1].

After the British Empire invaded and occupied Egypt in 1882, the British built the Nile’s

first dam in 1902 at Aswan, now called the, “Aswan Low Dam”. The Aswan Low Dam

formed a new reservoir, called Lake Nasser. This dam was deemed to be insufficient for

stopping flood waters, and so its height was increased in 1907-1912 and again 1929-1933.

In 1946, the dam was close to overflowing again so it was deemed unfit for purpose once

more. Instead of raising the dam yet again, another dam 6 km upstream was planned in

1956, the, “Aswan High Dam”. It was opened in 1970. The dams have enabled an increase

farmland size, and the generation of electricity through hydro-electric turbines.

Despite using the reservoir for farmland irrigation, heightening the Aswan Low Dam had

many harmful consequences. The silt present in flood water was held back behind the

dam, preventing the nutrients to be delivered further down the Nile. This means that

farmland is no longer sufficiently fertilised, and artificial methods have to be employed.

Chemicals from artificial fertilisers may be toxic and have an adverse effect on crop

quality. Without the silt, river banks became eroded causing the river to be less

structurally stable. At the mouth of the Nile, at the Mediterranean Sea, fishing in steadily

declining as there are no longer much nutrients entering the sea to attract marine life. In

addition to poorly designed irrigation systems, keeping water levels at a fixed height has

led to a massive increase in water-borne diseases such as schistosomiasis – a huge cost to

the Egyptian economy and healthcare standards.

Page 14: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

10

Another important consequence about the Aswan Low Dam construction was that sites of

archaeological importance have been submerged underwater. One example of this is the

Philae temple. When construction began to heighten this dam further in 1907, the

unavoidable result would be an increase to the height of Lake Nasser as well. This would

put even more land underwater, which would include further archaeological sites of

interest. Such sites would be many cemeteries. At the time, these cemeteries were going

to be lost in the name of progress. The Egyptian government sanctioned work to excavate

the remains found in the cemeteries in order to enable studies about the culture and

diseases of ancient Nubians. H. G. Lyons directed this project, with Elliot Smith heading

the excavations personally.

1.5 Ancient Egyptian time periods

Ancient Egypt history encompasses a large passage of time, from over 7,000 years ago.

This can be divided into 12 recognised time periods. This overview is generally recognised

by most Egyptologists as being a correct, common order of events (chronology). Although

some Egyptologists disagree about various dates of events and pharaohs, it is an area of

research in its own right [2].

Since this is a long period of time, there were many graveyards, cemeteries, across Nubia.

These cemeteries contained the remains of many Nubians, and more importantly,

included different burial practices. Each time periods typically has a common religion and

burial practice observed by the population. This has a direct consequence about how

ancient remains are preserved.

Page 15: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

11

1.6 Literature Review

There are essentially two ways that resources are kept: by a written by hand, or entered

electronically. These methods to describe ancient Nubia and modern healthcare are

detailed below, respectively.

1.6.1 Written Records

As mentioned earlier, Elliot Smith carried out excavations of the Nubian cemeteries which

were to be soon flooded, in 1907 [3]. Initial results from these examinations were

published in 1907-1910 in a small series of Bulletins. Larger reports were then published

separately from 1910 onwards. The Bulletins explained the work that was being carried

out with brief introductions explaining the area and conditions of remains found. It was

very much an archaeological expedition, with various characteristics of bodies recorded,

e.g. age, sex, size of bones. Another aspect of these reports concentrated on

anthropology, in particular about racial features. All the published material, the Bulletins

and even large reports, are very much generalised. Smith admitted at the time that he

was out of his depth when it came to pathology, and there was by no means the time or

resources available to put towards any adequate account of all the remains that were

found. The idea was that at a later date they should be examined in close detail, but this

time never passed for Smith.

After reading through the Bulletin reports, it can be plainly seen the confusion about

what diseases are being referred to for which remains, for what reasons. It is similarly not

possible to determine the prevalence of diseases amongst the dead because not all the

remains were examined in the same way. Only the most complete remains were kept and

shipped onwards for further study. Much of the incomplete ones were left behind. This

Page 16: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

12

makes current analysis rather more difficult than simply reading detailed, high-quality

reports. Furthermore, a century has now passed since these remains were examined and

(potentially) shipped onwards. Some might have been lost, misfiled, or collections broken

up. Particularly apparent common diseases seemed to be documented well, i.e.

osteoarthritis, but others were misdiagnosed due to the current popular diseases, i.e.

tuberculosis (TB) [4].

To take these descriptions a step further there are two other problems. Often conditions

were written as a general form rather than specific forms even if they might be a

combination of many together. At other times, different terms were being used for the

exact same condition. As such, precision to determine which remains were examined

exactly is lost. Also is information to learn how these ancient people lived and died.

1.6.2 Electronic Patient Records

EPRs are about retaining the periodic care given by a health provider. Typically this would

mean a clinician, which is including but not limited to a General Practitioner (GP) doctor, a

hospital specialist doctor, or a nurse. Such information would be recorded on an

electronic format [5].

EPRs have the potential to benefit clinicians delivering healthcare. Such as:

• Electronic prescription of drugs. Reducing errors from incorrectly writing or

reading the wrong drug or dosage.

• Enabling evidence based medicine & clinical decisions support. By performing

studies looking at different treatments, the best course of action can be identified,

implemented and backed-up by scientific evidence.

Page 17: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

13

• Medical coding for interoperable information exchange & administrative tracking,

and improving adherence to clinical guidelines. Drug history, images, laboratory work,

diagnosis, can all be shared and followed between clinicians seamlessly, reducing waste

and saving costs. This also enables clinicians to prove what treatment is being given to

patients for what reasons.

Even though all NHS General Practitioners (GPs) in the UK use EPRs, they cannot

necessarily be linked directly to systems used by hospitals (a lack of interoperability). The

reason for this current state of affairs is wide-ranging, from the government offering

incentives and making the painful process of change easier for GPS, and the complexities

(with increase costs) of integrating computer systems with hospitals. In addition, there is

an inherent resistance from clinicians and NHS managers to change with computers, as

systems have time and again failed to deliver up to expectations in the past. Under the

Department of Health in 2005, a group was created to be responsible for delivering

joined-up computerised healthcare solutions throughout the NHS, named Connecting for

Health (CfH) [6].

The main problems for EPR are in two main areas: the data itself and the costs involved.

The data is describing a patient, used by clinician’s working through the NHS for the

benefit of the patient. Who owns this record is in question as many parties are involved.

Another point in question is who governs the data. How the information is stored,

distributed and used is mainly left up to the NHS Trust in the area, but the data belongs to

the patient after all. Data security is of paramount importance and healthcare records are

very personal and should never remain public. If records are accessible from potentially

thousands of terminals across a Trust or country, then that must be a security problem.

Page 18: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

14

The other area, about cost, is very important as hospitals have to buy into a software

package in order to comply with CfH. Such packages may be of hindrance to clinicians

rather than a help. Perhaps due to improper training, personal resistance to change, or

the system failing to perform to specifications.

In contrast to GP surgeries, traditional paper records are still used throughout in hospitals

today. In many areas, EPRs are running in conjunction with, or alongside paper based

records. Such is the case for maternity and the use of “client held records” – EPRs are

entered onto a midwife’s computer system, and a physical paper copy of medical notes

are held by the expectant mother, with other physical copies also held by the midwife [7].

Even though this situation of record keeping is sub-optimal, healthcare is still delivered to

a high standard as the history of care can be quickly and accurately accessed. That being

the case, time (and thereby money) is wasted entering redundant information onto

multiple places. The mother’s held record is the primary record, if that is lost potentially

important information is also permanently lost with it. If different clinicians are writing or

adding other information (such as images) into the same record, potentially the use of

different terms (or different meaning of terms) could be misinterpreted leading to

wrongful treatment. The EPR in this case is rather just for administrative purposes to

track movement, appointments and drug history in order to produce correct receipts for

invoicing costs.

1.7 Introduction Summary

In summary, the ancient Nubian region and the ancient remains found from the area is a

subject that is heavily based upon physical records and expert knowledge obtained large

from inaccessible sources. Modern electronic methods of defining what information is

Page 19: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

15

relevant, as well as storing such information so that it is publically available could help

improve studies by ensuring all necessary information is kept, a common understanding is

developed, and studies compared in a more consistent manner.

Page 20: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

16

2 Methods

There are many different methods that could be employed in order to address the need

to capture, store, and reason about data relating to ancient Nubian skeletons or

mummies.

2.1 Ontology Option

One option, which the author chose for this project, is to create an ontology.

An ontology is the representation of knowledge through concepts. It can be thought

about as a directed acyclic graph. Ontologies are made up of components put together,

giving rise to a concept. Typical components include: individuals (objects), relations, rules,

and events. Examples of concepts might be: “A car” -> “hasWheels” -> “4”. “A car” ->

“IsAKindOf” -> “Vehicle”. If such concepts are applied, if you have a car and it has four

wheels, by this definition it can be reasoned that this car is a kind of a vehicle. Even

though the fact might not be explicitly said in the car’s own description. That is not to say

that all vehicles are cars, or that all cars have four wheels, or if something has four wheels

that makes it a car. Depending on how components are described leads to specific

implications.

After performing a literary survey, it appears that no good ontologies about ancient Egypt

or Nubia have been constructed by Egyptologists. It is important not be confused with the

original, less widely used meaning for the word, “ontology” which is to do with ancient

Greek philosophy.

Ontologies offer the chance to spell out exactly what something is, or means, or relates to

something else. It offers a common vocabulary or terminology to be set and used. This is

Page 21: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

17

important because information can often be missing or misinterpreted. Two terms could

have different names but the same meaning. One term could have different meanings in

different contexts. Terms could be assumed implicitly (not mentioned explicitly). All these

aspects put together can create confusion and a lack of understanding between all sorts

of parties, ranging from when dealing between experts in the field, to novices new to the

area. Experts may have conflicting points of views or definitions, and novices may miss

information because it is implicit.

The four main points that an ontology achieves are as follows [8]:

Sharing common understanding [9]. Information can be structured in a certain

way that enables a person to access the terms used in a standardised way. This

can be made publically available so that anyone can be granted access. Further

analysis or studies can be potentially made with similarly compatible information.

Reuse domain knowledge. Different ontologies might describe a certain area – a

domain – in different manners. When creating an ontology which includes

information relating to a different domain, specific ontologies can be imported so

that desired domain descriptions are used, avoiding conflicts or confusion.

Specific domain assumptions. Spelling out assumptions about domains explicitly

enables them to be changed quickly and easily. Novices can gain all relevant

information about the constituent parts of a domain enabling greater

understanding.

Separate domain and operational knowledge. Domain knowledge about entities –

such as an item, a person, or a place – can be separate from operational

knowledge, about how tasks are carried out or completed. This helps to enable

Page 22: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

18

domains to be reused as information can be accurately segregated into different

parts.

Domain knowledge analysis. Formally analysing domains enables reasoning about

information. This means that different parts of a domain can be worked out or

proved, through their relationships with other parts. Entire ontologies can be then

imported into other ontologies, and built upon further to describe a greater range

of information.

2.2 Database Option

Another option of this project would be to design a database to represent knowledge. A

database enables storage of information contained in rows, contained in tables. These

tables can be linked to other tables in the database forming relationships. In order to

access the information, an accessible computer server and client system would need to sit

alongside the database to interpret queries for searching, inserting, editing, and deleting.

Only simple relationships can be formed between tables. Ontology concepts are not

featured, and relationships almost entirely would revolve around one column of a table

being the same as one column in a different table.

The main purpose of a database is to store information permanently. If access has been

set up so that remote users can query the database, the information can thus be shared.

Interfacing one database with another database is often a difficult task, as there is a high

likelihood of incompatibility. The structure of databases can vary wildly between different

authors, even for the same type of information. With the added complication of different

and perhaps implicit terminology, plugging two together can become very complex.

Page 23: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

19

Often a change to a small part of a database can have large consequences as relationships

with other tables are affected in turn. This causes maintenance of databases to be an

important task, requiring technical knowledge of how to alter the database, as well as

updating any systems that are interlinked. A novice can become overwhelmed by the

sheer volume of information presented, and an expert could feasibly not be able to find

the exact information desired due to poor navigational design.

2.3 Why an ontology

With the aim of managing knowledge relating to ancient Nubian remains, the author

decided to create an ontology. Conceptually, it enables a more detailed representation of

items and how they are related to one another. Such as: a cemetery contains graves, a

cemetery is at a certain location, and ancient skeletons are found in these graves. the

author can thus accurately define what an ancient skeleton is by explicitly describing the

relationships and attributes around the domain. A database would simply not be able to

easily capture these relationships, show them to a user, and reason about their

correctness or relevance.

For both ontologies and databases, software is freely available. An ontology can be

described using a standardized description language – OWL. A newly developed syntax,

“Manchester OWL” was developed enabling easier writing and reading of quantifiers to

describe relationships [10]. The author chose to use a Java program called Protégé-2000,

version 4.1 to create my ontology as it is freely available and fully supports Manchester

OWL [11].

Page 24: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

20

For free databases, MySQL and PostgresSQL appear to be the two most popular choices

across the world [12, 13]. Both support close to unlimited sizes of tables and rows held

inside them, fully supporting the globally used database query language, SQL.

2.4 Written Information

Information relating to analysis of ancient Nubian remains, as mentioned earlier, is mainly

held in large published books of from the early 20th century. For some remains, these are

the only available written records in existence. As such, these reports are highly

inaccessible. There are only a small number of these report books published, and they

cannot be simply loaned out. The Forensic Egyptology department at the University of

Manchester has one copy of each of the volumes, but the physical reading of them if

difficult. Apart from the text being a little awkward to understand as certain volumes are

now over a century old, the books are physically falling apart since they are so old and

worn. No digital copies are in existence for these texts either, which increases the reliance

upon and value of the hard copy even further.

The books cannot be loaned out to outside of the department, and only one person can

work upon the books at any one time. One option to help solve the supremacy of the

hard copy book would be to digitize the books into a PDF format, for example. This is not

a trivial task. Digitizing a book normally involves running the pages through or onto a

scanner. Both such methods involve removing the pages from the book’s spine, or

opening the book up fully and laying it flat down (much like a photocopier). These books

are so valuable and fragile that scanning in these ways are simply not feasible options.

Another way would be to scroll down with a hand-held scanner, but these devices can be

expensive, error-prone, inaccurate and incompatible with computer operating systems.

Page 25: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

21

The author decided to undertake another option which occurred to me: using a camera to

take photographs of pages, and then run it through Optical Character Recognition (OCR)

software to process text. This method is non-destructive, causes no harm to the physical

book, and should create a useful digital output. The only other possible option, which the

author did not do, would be to painstakingly retype the volume by hand into a word

processor. Although this would perhaps grant the greatest accuracy in capturing text into

a digital format, there was simply not enough time in this project to budget.

2.5 Methods Summary

The two explored methods of defining an electronic standard were essentially through

either an ontology, or through a database. In order to represent knowledge in a more

meaningful way, an ontology was chosen. A database was not chosen; even though a

database would be a good practical solution to storing records regarding hundreds of

ancient remains, relationships may be limited because everything cannot be explicitly

mentioned.

Page 26: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

22

3 Analysis

The author created an ontology to represent ancient Nubian remains knowledge using

Protégé-2000 - see Appendix 1 for the source code. This ontology is described below.

3.1 Ancient Nubian Ontology

The ontology has the following main sections, discussed in detail in turn.

3.1.1Site

The Site class is to describe information relating to places, divided into various subclasses.

These are listed as follows: Cataract, Cemetery, Country, Dam, Grave, Lake, Region, River,

and Town.

The author has defined relationships between these sites to try and explicitly point out

how one is associated to another. Going from top – down,

A Region has a minimum of one country. (Region hasCountry min 1 Country).

An instance – individual – of region exists, called Nubia. (Nubia).

A Country may or may not have rivers, or towns. (Country hasSiteContents some

River. Country hasSiteContents some Town).

Two countries exist, Egypt and Sudan. (Egypt, Sudan).

Nubia includes Egypt and Sudan as its countries. (Nubia hasCountry Egypt. Nubia

hasCountry Sudan).

A River may or may not have cataracts, dams, or lakes. (River hasCataract some

Cataract. River hasDam some Dam. River hasLake some Lake).

One River exists, the River Nile. (RiverNile).

Egypt has a river called the River Nile. (Egypt hasRiver RiverNile).

Page 27: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

23

Six cataracts of the Nile exist. (FirstNileCataract … SixthNileCataract).

The River Nile has six cataracts along it. (RiverNile hasCataract FirstNileCataract …

RiverNile hasCataract SixthNileCataract).

One Lake exists, Lake Nasser. (LakeNasser).

The River Nile has a lake called Lake Nasser. (RiverNile hasLake LakeNasser).

Two dams exist, the Aswan High Dam and the Aswan Low Dam. (AswanHighDam,

AswanLowDam).

The River Nile has two damns, the Aswan High Dam and the Aswan Low Dam.

(RiverNile hasDam AswanHighDam. RiverNile hasDam AswanLowDam).

A town exists, called Biga. (Biga).

Egypt has the town, Biga. (Egypt hasSiteContents Biga).

A cemetery has an accession ID, and contains at least one grave site. (Cemetery

hasCemeteryAccessionID some ID. Cemetery hasGraveSite min 1 Grave).

Five cemeteries exist. (CemeteryOne … CemeteryFive).

Each cemetery has its own accession ID. (CemeteryOne hasCemeteryAccessionID

“1”^^ID … CemeteryFive hasCemeteryAccessionID “5”^^ID).

Biga contains the number 5 cemetery. (Biga hasCemetery CemeteryFive).

A Grave may or may not contain some ancient human remains, a Grave has some

grave accession ID, and a grave can be of either Shallow Grave or Tomb type.

(Grave hasAncientHumanRemains some AncientHumanRemains. Grave

hasAccessionID some ID. Grave hasGraveType some GraveTypeVP. Grave

hasGraveTypeOnly some GraveTypeVP.

Various graves exist that are in cemeteries and they contain a set of human

remains, e.g. Grave number 1 in Cemetery number Five. (GraveFive-1

Page 28: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

24

hasGraveAccessionID “1”^^ID. GraveFive-1. GraveFive-1 haGraveType only

ShalllowGrave. GraveFive-1 hasGraveType some ShallowGrave. GraveFive-1

hasAncientHumanRemains Individual0000001. CemeteryFive hasGraveSite

GraveFive-1.

There is also a functional property applies to the main Site class, that any Site may or may

not have a free text description, and may or may not have some locational data. (Site

hasFreeTextDescription some string. Site hasLocationData some string).

In addition the author has defined that CemeteryFive has a free text description of,

“Cemetery 5 was situated ….” (CemeteryFive hasFreeTextDescription “Cemetery 5 was

situated …”). And that this cemetery also has specific latitude and longitude coordinates,

and is currently inaccessible because it is underwater. (CemeteryFive hasLatitideData

“32.886626“. CemeteryFive hasLongditudeData “24.021111”. CemeteryFive

hasAccessibilityStatus “Submerged”). Latitude and Longitude data are achieved because

the author has defined a Data Property hasLocationData, with two sub-properties

contained within – hasLatitudeData and hasLongditudeData.

3.1.2 Person

Now that initial understanding of the region has been captured and explained, the

ancient human remains have been listed under the next main class, Person. Person

contains two subclasses: AncientPerson and ResearchPerson. Two are two types of an

AncientPerson, AncientHumanRemains and ImportantAncientPerson. There is further one

kind of ImportantAncientPerson, DoctorIAP.

Page 29: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

25

Each person may or may not have a free text description, and each person may or

may not have a sex. (Person hasFreeTextDescription some string. Person hasSex

some SexVP).

An Ancient Person has to be from some ancient time period. An Ancient Person

may or may not have a publication record. And an Ancient Person may or may not

have locational data. (AncientPerson hasAncientTimePeriod some

AncientTimePeriod. AncientPerson hasAncientTimePeriod only

AncientTimePeriod AncientPerson hasDescriptionOrigin some PublicationRecord.

AncientPerson hasLocationData some string).

A Research Person has to be from a modern time period. (ResearchPerson

hasModernTimePeriod some ModernTimePeriod. ResearchPerson

hasModernTimePeriod only ModernTimePeriod).

Three research people exist. (GeorgeAndrewReisner, HGLyons, RosalieDavid).

Ancient Human Remains may or may not have a type of burial dressing.

(AncientHumanRemains hasBurialDressing some BurialDressingVP).

Ancient Human Remains may or may not have a type of burial position.

(AncientHumanRemains hasBurialPosition some BurialPositionVP).

Ancient Human Remains may or may not have some completeness to them.

(AncientHumanRemains hasCompleteness some CompletenessConditionVP).

Ancient Human Remains may or may not have some condition to them.

(AncientHumanRemains hasConditionQuality some ConditionQialityVP).

AncientHumanRemains may or may not have diagnoses. (AncientHumanRemains

hasDiagnosisSomeDiagnosis).

Page 30: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

26

AncientHumanRemains may or may not have medical tests.

(AncientHumanRemains hasMedicalTest some MedicalTest).

AncientHumanRemains have some type of remains. (AncientHumanRemains

hasRemainsType some RemainsTypeVP. AncientHumanRemains hasRemainsType

only RemainsTypeVP).

AncientHumanRemains may or may not have medical treatments.

(AncientHumanRemains hasTreatment some MedicalTreatment).

The author has defined two instances of type AncientHumanRemains –

Individual00000001 and Individual00000007.

Individual00000001 is unwrapped, partially complete, has a diagnosis of Spondylitis, is a

skeleton, and is male. The remains have been researched by George Andrew Reisner, is

from the Middle Nubian ancient time period, and was originally described in The

Archaeological survey of Nubia report for 1907-8 Volume 1. There are many

measurements of bones taken and so recorded.

(Individual00000001 hasBurialDressing some Unwrapped. Individual00000001

hasCompleteness only PartiallyComplete. Individual00000001 hasCompleteness some

PartiallyComplete. Individual00000001 hasDiagnosis only Spondylitis. Individual00000001

hasDiagnosis some Spondylitis. Individual00000001 hasRemainsType only

SkeletonRemains. Individual00000001 hasRemainsType some SkeletonRemains.

Individual00000001 hasSex only Male. Individual00000001 hasSex some Male.

Individual00000001 isResearchedBy GeorgeAndrewReisner. Individual00000001

hasAncienttimePeriod MiddleNubian. Individual00000001 hasdescriptionOrigin

The_archaeological_survey_of_Nubia. _Report_for_1907-8. Individual00000001

Page 31: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

27

hasRightFemurLength 449. Individual00000001 hasRightClavicleLength 150.

Individual00000001 hasSyphysisMentiHeight 35. Individual00000001 hastotalFacialHeight

93. Individual00000001 hasRightHumerusLength 234. Individual00000001

hasFreeTextDescription “An old white-haired man…”. Individual00000001

hasCranialCapacity 1750. Individual00000001 hasBigonialBreadth 105.

Individual00000001 hasUpperFacialHeight 70. Individual00000001

hasNoseLengthBreadth “50x26. Individual00000001 hasCraniumHeight 128.

Individual00000001 hasPalateLengthBreadth “49x43”. Individual00000001

hasMaxCreaniumLength 195. Individual00000001 hasLeftOrbitLengthBreadth “42x38”.

Individual00000001 hasCranialBaseLength 104. Individual00000001 hasFacialBaseLength

97. Individual00000001 hasInterorbBreadth 25. Individual00000001

hasSigmoudNotchHeight 54. Individual00000001 hasMaxCreaniumBreadth 150.

Individual00000001 hasBizgomaticBreadth 140. Individual00000001

hasRightOrbitOLengthBreadth “43x36”.).

Individual00000007 has a diagnosis of a fractured bone, is a skeleton, and is female. The

remains have been researched by George Andrew Reisner, is from the Middle Nubian

ancient time period, and was originally described in The Archaeological survey of Nubia

report for 1907-8 Volume 1. There are many measurements of bones taken and so

recorded.

(Individual00000007 hasDiagnosis only BoneFracture. Individual00000007 hasDiagnosis

some BoneFracture. Individual00000007 hasRemainsType only SkeletonRemains.

Individual00000007 hasRemainsType some SkeletonRemains. Individual00000007 hasSex

only Female. Individual00000007 hasSex some Female. Individual00000007

Page 32: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

28

isResearchedBy GeorgeAndrewReisner. Individual00000007 hasAncienttimePeriod

MiddleNubian. Individual00000007 hasdescriptionOrigin The_archaeological_survey

_of_Nubia.Report_for_1907-8. Individual00000007 hasCranialBaseLength 102.

Individual00000007 hasRightOrbitOLengthBreadth “40x33”. Individual00000007

hasPalateLengthBreadth “46x39”. Individual00000007 hasAurciularHeight 108.

Individual00000007 hasMaxCraniumBreadth 136. Individual00000007

hasFreeTextDescription “A middle-aged woman…”. Individual00000007

hasLeftHumerusLength313. Individual00000007 has leftFemurLength 437.

Individual00000007 hasSigmoidNotchHeight 48. Individual00000007

hasLeftClavicleLength 135. Individual00000007 hasLeftOrbitLengthBreadth “40x33”.

Individual00000007 hasFacialBaseLength 92. Individual00000007 hasUpperFacialHeight

68. Individual00000007 hasLeftHumerusLength 248. Individual00000007

hasCraniumCircumference 520. Individual00000007 hasrightClavicleLength 133.

Individual00000007 hasFacialBaseLength 88. Individual00000007

hasRightHumerusLength 313. Individual00000007 hasTotalFacialHeight 115.

Individual00000007 hasSymphysisMentiHeight 33. Individual00000007

hasrightFemurLength 436. Individual00000007 hasMaxCraniumHeight 124.

Individual00000007 hasNoseLengthBreadth “48x25”. Individual00000007

hasInterorbBreadth 27.5).

Throughout the description of Person, The author has included many other classes that

are involved with further relationships. Perhaps the next most relevant class to Person, is

Diagnosis.

Page 33: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

29

3.1.3 Diagnosis

The author has defined a Diagnosis with a few chosen subclasses: AncientPersonDiagnosis

and InjuryDiagnosis. AncientPersonDiagnosis attempts to describe the various diagnosis

that have been made about a set of ancient remains, and so it contains appropriate

subclasses e.g. AgeDiagnosis. InjuryDiagnosis has been divided up into BoneFracture,

DegenerativeDisease, DentalProblem, and InfectiousDisease. There are two types of

DegenerativeDisease, Osteoarthritis and Spondylitis. There is one DetalProblem, a

DentalAbscess. And there are three infectious diseases – AlveolarAbscess,

Schistosomiasis, and Tuberculosis.

A Diagnosis generally may or may not have some certainty, a free text description, a

medical coding, related to a medical test, and has to be researched by a ResearchPerson.

(Diagnosis hasCertainty some CertaintyVP. Diagnosis hasFreeTextDescription some string.

Diagnosis hasMedicalCoding some string. Diagnosis isDiagnosedFrom some MedicalTest.

Diagnosis isResearchedBy some ResearchPerson. Diagnosis isResearchedby only

ResearchPerson).

An AncientPersonDiagnosis may or may not be valid, and so has an added validity value

attached to it. (AncientPersonDiagnosis hasValidity some ValidityVP).

And InjuryDiagnosis may or may not have a potential cause and severity. In a similar

manner, this fact has been added to the definition. (InjuryDiagnosis hasInjuryCause some

InjuryCauseVP. InjuryDiagnosis hasInjurySeverity some InjurySeverityVP).

Both BoneFracture and Spondylitis can only be diagnosed from imaging, and so a further

constraint has been added to them. (BoneFracture isDiagnosedFrom only

Page 34: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

30

(ImagingPhotograph or ImagingXray. Spondylitis isDiagnosedFrom only

(ImagingPhotograph or ImagingXray).

Spondylitis has its own ICD9 medical code, and so has been added to its definition.

(Spondylitis hasICD9 “721.90”).

3.1.4 Medical Test

The MedicalTest class groups together the various medical tests that can be taken place

upon ancient human remains. These include the subclasses, DNAsequenceMedicalTest,

EndoscopyMedicalTest, HistologyMedicalTest, ImagingMedicalTest, and ImmunoCyto

ChemistyMedicalTest. ImagingMedicalTest has four subclasses contained within:

ImagingCTscan, ImagingMRIscan, ImagingPhtograph and ImagingXray.

MedicalTests are said to may or may not have some free text description, performed

using a body part and is researched only by a ResearchPerson. (MedicalTest

hasFreeTextDescription some string. MedicalTest isPerformedUsing some BodyPart.

MedicalTest isResearchedBy some ResearchPerson. MedicalTest isResearchedBy only

ResearchPerson).

3.1.5 Body Part

As MedicalTest involve performing a test on a body part (BodyPart), this class defines the

various body parts potentially available to researchers. Subclasses include: Bone, Brain,

Heart, Liver, and Tooth. Bones are divided up into subclasses, resembling the similar areas

they are found in the body: ArmBone, BackBone, ChestBone, LegBone, and SkullBone.

Each of these are then divided up further, e.g. in the ArmBone, subclasses are: HandBone,

Humerus, Radius, Ulna.

Page 35: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

31

All BodyParts may or may not have some completeness to them, as well as some

laterality. (BodyPart hasCompleteness some CompletenessConditionVP. BodyPart

hasLaterality some LateralityVP).

3.1.6 Artefact

Although this Artefact class is not directly used by other classes, the author has included it

as often graves contain more than just human remains. Sometimes artefacts are present,

which can also be similarly described. In have defined my artefact class to contain the

following subclasses: AncientClothing, AncientJewellery, AnimalRemains, Bowl, Noose,

Plant, Pot. Artefacts all may or may not have completeness to them, a condition, a free

text description or locational data. (Artefact hasCompleteness some ComplnetenessVP.

Artefact hasConditionQuality some ConditionQualityVP. Artefact hasFreetextDescription

some string. Artefact hasLocationData some string).

3.1.7 Medical Treatment

Similar to artefact, the author has included this class to describe any medical treatment

that an ancient person received (potentially thousands of years ago). Even though not

present on the vast majority of reports about the remains, the capacity is still present.

MedicalTreatments include Drug and Splint. MedicalTreatments may or may not have a

free text description and are only performed by ancient doctors. (MedicalTreatment

hasFreeTextDescription some string. MedicalTreatment hasTreatmentOrigin some

DoctorIAP. MedicalTreatment hasTreatmentOrigin only DoctorIAP).

3.1.8 Time Period

The author has defined a class TimePeriod to describe different time periods that are

involved with the ancient human remains and research done. They are segregated into

Page 36: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

32

two different main subclasses – AncientTimePeriod and ModernTimePeriod. The

ModernTimePeriod contains centuries (individuals) of the modern era where analysis was

carried out– 19thCentury, 20thCentury and 21stCentury. The AncientTimePeriods

contains the groups (individuals) of recognised similar civilisation phases. These

AncientTimePeriods may also have the same name meaning the same period, e.g.

MiddleKingdom is identical to MiddleNubian, TwelfthDynastyNubian and C-group.

Each TimePeriod has a data property of a StartDate and EndData. These are of Gregorian

year format, of the rough time-frames which are involved, e.g. MiddleNubian

hasStartDate 2066 BC. MiddleNubian hasEndDate 1781BC.

AncientTimePeriods are defined to may or may not have main burial practices, and

religions. E.g. MiddleNubian hasBurialPosition some LegsStraight. ChristianPeriod

hasMainReligion Christianity.

3.1.9 Publication Record

A Publication Record describes how ancient remains have been studied. Much like

TimePeriod, it is one main class, PublicationRecord, divided into two subclasses –

AncientPublicationRecord and ModernPublicationRecord. Ancient records include

Hieroglyphs and Papyrus. Modern records include Drawing, PhotographRecord,

ResearchBook, ResearchPaper and ManchesterAncientEgyptianBioBank.

All PublicationRecords may or may not have a free text description. Modern records are

only from modern time periods, and ancient records are only form ancient time periods.

Ancient records are authored by an important ancient person, and modern records are

only authored by ResearchPersons. (PublicationRecord hasFreeTextDescription some

Page 37: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

33

string. AncientPublicationRecord hasAncientTimePeriod only AncientTimePeriod.

AncientPublicationRecord hasAncientTimePeriod some AncientTimePeriod.

AncientPublicationRecord has Author only ImportantAncientPerson.

AncientPublicationRecord has Author some ImportantAncientPerson.

ModernPublicationRecord hasAuthor only ResearchPerson. ModernPublicationRecord

has Author some ResearchPerson. ModernPublicationRecord hasModernTimePeriod only

ModernTimePeriod. ModernPublicationRecord hasModernTimePeriod some

ModernTimePeriod.

One instance of ModernPublicationRecord exists, The_archaeological_survey_of_

Nubia._Report_for1907-8. This individual has both HG Lyons and George Andrew Reisner

as its authors. (The_archaeological_survey_of_ Nubia._Report_for1907-8 hasAuthor

HGLyons. The_archaeological_survey_of_ Nubia._Report_for1907-8 hasAuthor

GeorgeAndrewReisner).

3.1.10 Religion

Religion simply exists a class of its own, with the following individuals:

AncientEgyptianMythology, AncientGreekMythology, AncientRomanMythology,

Christianity, and Islam. Each religion is associated to a god through the data property:

hasGod some String. E.g. Christianity hasGod “Jesus”. AncientGreekMythology hasGod

“Zeus”.

3.1.11 Value Partition

As mentioned throughout the earlier classes, the author has separated out values that are

attached to classes in relationships into a class of their own, called ValuePartition. This

gives the ontology some additional structure in which to manage information regarding

Page 38: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

34

quantities. E.g. SexVP has two subclasses Female and Male. SexVP is used in the Person

class to define the sex of an individual.

3.1.12 Data Properties

Data Properties are used essentially to define attributes for classes or individuals. These

can be defined to have a particular type, which is useful for searching or comparisons. For

example, Accession IDs are of type “ID”, and measurements are of type “double”. This

allows unique identifiers and numerical values with decimal places, respectively.

(hasCemeteryAccessionID Ranges ID. hasLeftClavicleMeasurement Ranges Double).

3.2 OCR processing

Photographs taken on a 10 megapixel camera were imported into the OCR software,

ABBY FineReader 10 and processed over [14]. This program produced an output text

document of the descriptions of the cemeteries. Most pages contained incorrect

characters and had to be manually corrected through proof reading. This enabled the

author to have access to passages contained in the physical book, enabling use of the text

outside of the laboratory. Through using Protégé-2000, it was not possible to attach

photos to individuals, and so have been left aside for possible future project use in the

KNH Centre of Forensic Egyptology.

3.3 Analysis Summary

The above mentioned analysis has detailed the decisions made on how the author

converted flowing natural language knowledge about ancient Nubia and ancient remains

from that region into a formal computerized language.

Page 39: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

35

4 Validation

Discussion about the ontology that the author created can be done through two avenues:

1. About the content relating to ancient Nubia, the ancient remains, and the study

thereof.

2. About the structure to the content, about how information is organised and

knowledge obtained through relationships.

4.1 Ancient Nubian content

In order to validate the ontology against correct information about ancient Nubia, the

author has managed to talk to researchers at the Forensic Egyptology department, in the

KNH Centre of the University of Manchester. Originally the author had planned to

interview Dr. Rosalie David, but unfortunately the ontology development took longer

than anticipated, and no such meeting was possible due to scheduling conflicts. Instead,

the author managed to talk to two other individuals – Angela Thomas, and Dr. Jenefer

Cockitt [15].

Angela Thomas is the current keeper of the International Mummy Database and Tissue

Bank. Information about thousands of Tissue Samples are kept, indexed, and maintained

as well as the listings of dozens of mummies. The current state of tissue samples are up-

to-date against any studies that have been carried out upon them. From talking to Angela

the author found a greater appreciation of what essential information needs to be

recorded for particular tissue samples, for forensic studies, and how to track where

samples are.

Page 40: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

36

In this context, the ontology makes sense. The AncientRemains are of highest importance,

because most of the relationships are to do with it, and every other class is either directly

or indirectly linked. One problem with the current setup that Angela has to deal with is

poor searching functionality. That is, if a diagnosis has been made of a study about a

tissue sample, unless an exact term is entered, and then searched upon, the diagnosis can

be easily missed. Or if diagnoses have been omitted because they are assumed to have

been present automatically. The ontology overcomes this problem by the introduction of

medical coding. Using a specific ICD or SNOMED-CT term to uniquely identify a particular

type of disease diagnosis makes it very easy for all relevant remains samples to be found.

Of a study, every medical test done against a set of ancient remains can be explicitly

defined. This can help aid tracking to see what tests have been carried out for what

samples, by whom. Including such information can help further research by making

previous studies more accessible so that tests are not unnecessarily repeated or lost.

What is currently lacking from the ontology is a proper means of sample tracking. Of the

ancient Nubian remains described in the physical books, some remains are missing or

lost, but others are present. The ontology currently does not capture information relating

to this, about if ancient remains are held by an institute, or their loan history. In addition,

the exact dates of medical tests or diagnoses are not recorded. Even though exact dates

are not used, at the very least the closest modern century has been listed which is at least

useful to determine how available study documentation may be. Research books and

papers from the 21st Century should be readily available in a physical or digital format,

whereas 20th Century material would likely only be in a physical format.

Page 41: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

37

Dr. Jenefer Cockitt is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the KNH Centre and is currently

performing investigations relating to ancient Nubian disease. To answer questions

relating to ancient Nubian knowledge, Dr. Cockitt is more than adequately qualified. Upon

describing the ontology in detail for each class, it became clear that the information is

along the correct lines. For instance, if Site is considered: the River Nile does flow through

Egypt and Nubia does span two countries today, through Egypt and the Sudan. Cemetery

Five which is at Biga is currently submerged underwater, and Biga is a place in Egypt. And

so if a particular set of ancient remains are said to be in a particular grave in Cemetery

Five, and from an ancient time period, it can be easily deduced that they are indeed

ancient Nubian remains. For an expert such as Dr. Cockitt, dealing with remains from this

submerged Cemetery Five might be assumed that they were Nubian, from a particular

time period, and what the word Nubian means. For a novice, all this information is

expressed explicitly. This makes the definition of what Nubian is much better refined,

without missing information. To a good extent, knowledge related to places has been

captured and reasoned through by relationships.

One specific aspect of the ontology the author was wary of was related to accession IDs.

Through the physical book where the information was obtained from, cemeteries were

just given numbers, e.g. “Five”. In addition, Graves were just given numbers too, e.g.

“One”. This seemed very arbitrary and not particularly unique. When queried, such

accession IDs are actually correct and still used to reference the exact same cemeteries

and graves. Even though this may be correct, the author believes a newer version of

accession IDs should be constructed perhaps based upon the old ones. The author

attempted to do this through listing grave number 1 of Cemetery Five as GraveFive-1.

Page 42: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

38

One problem is that the first grave of, for example, Cemetery Five is called “1”, and the

first grave of Cemetery Four is also called, “1”. They both have the same accession IDs,

and so when used in isolation, they don’t cannot be told apart unless implied from the

context. That means that their cemetery accession ID has to be used in conjunction which

is not ideal because this can easily be omitted.

The concept that a set of ancient remains is from a certain ancient time period is correct,

as a person did live, die, and was buried at some rough point, however many centuries

ago. These ancient time periods initially contained in the ontology were the generally

recognised ancient Egyptian time periods, e.g. MiddleKingdom. Upon further discussion,

it was revealed that ancient Nubian time periods are not exactly the same as the ancient

Egyptian time periods [16]. Due to the fact that many centuries ago, Egypt was not such a

well-defined country by today’s modern standards and that most of the Egyptian dating

to obtain an accurate time period is done through historical events, such as a pyramid

been built. These events mainly happened in other areas of Egypt, away from the Nubian

region. As such, ancient Nubian time periods cannot be as accurately defined. Instead,

dating of Nubian remains has to be done archeologically through artefacts held inside the

grave, the burial position and practice of the ancient remains found inside the grave, and

radiocarbon dating. In one of the physical books from 1908, it has defined the ancient

Nubian time periods with their corresponding ancient Egyptian periods. These terms are

correct and still used today.

As a consequence, the author updated the ontology to include additional ancient time

periods, e.g. MiddleNubian. MiddleNubian is said to be an identical individual to

MiddleKingdom. And so the term MiddleNubian can be interchanged with

Page 43: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

39

MiddleKingdom as they both roughly mean the same thing. In other volumes of the

research books in this series, one term is not used consistently throughout. This is an

example of implicit information held inside the research papers – if the term Middle

Nubian is used, of course it refers to the same time as the Middle Kingdom, although the

term Middle Nubian is not explained anywhere apart from an obscure single paragraph

held inside one page out of hundreds, from a single book volume out of dozens in a

series.

4.2 Ontological structure

To validate the ontology in terms of its structure, the author managed to talk to Dr.

Robert Stevens [17]. Dr. Stevens is a senior lecturer at the School of Computer Science at

the University of Manchester. His main research area includes the use of ontologies to

describe biological knowledge in a useful way for understanding and collaboration. Upon

navigating through the ontology, Dr. Stevens managed to identify many aspects which

were not fully correct when describing information and expressing knowledge.

The ontology originally listed the class Gender, and contained two individuals: Female,

make, and Unknown. And then a Person hasGender GenderVP. It was revealed that this

was not a particularly good way to describe what the author was intending to – that a

person is either female, male, or it is not known. In actuality the ontology described that

there were only one instance of male or female, and unknown meant absolutely anything

else. A suggestion was made that the author was actually trying to define a person’s sex,

which can either be female or male, and that if it is not known that it is simply not

mentioned explicitly. The author managed to implement this solution relatively quickly by

Page 44: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

40

making a class called Sex, with subclasses Female and Male, with a relationship Person

hasSex some SexVP. This now adequately defines whether a person is male, or female, or

not known.

Another aspect that was defined at first was the class Area, which contained subclasses

Region, Country, River, and so-forth. This entered very complicated domain of ontological

knowledge. A country is defined by what land mass it occupies, and if describing various

parts of a country that is contained within it, then these should be referred to as Sites

which contain land. And so the class Area was renamed to Site. The Nubian Region spans

part through Egypt and part through the Sudan, and so it is not particularly accurate that

the Nubian region contains Egypt and Sudan, because this does not include the entirety of

the two countries. The River Nile flows through Egypt, but there comes the question

about how to define a river. Is a river the land that the river flows through, i.e. the river

bed? Or is it the water that flows above the land? For the purposes of this ontology, the

River Nile was simply mentioned that it exists, has various aspects to it, e.g. Lake Nasser.

Though this does not properly convey the knowledge of what it means for the River Nile

to be a river.

Moving onto much more important parts of the ontology relating to the ancient remains

themselves, further discussion took place. Originally, an individual of BoneFracture was

created as an InjuryDiagnosis. This was incorrect as, like with Gender, what this meant

that was only one BoneFracture ever in existence. The intention was instead to define

that a human remains could have an diagnosis of a bone fracture. Instead, the suggestion

was to create a class BoneFracture under InjuryDiagnosis, and state that the ancient

remains which contained a broken bone, e.g. Individual0000007 hasDiagnosis some

Page 45: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

41

BoneFracture. This suggestion was carried out, and the ontology updated to reflect this

relationship.

Moreover, a more critical problem occurred with describing the various measurements of

the bones of ancient remains. There are current many data properties relating to bone

measurements, i.e. hasLeftClavicleLength, hasRightClavicleLength, hasLeftFemurLength,

etc. This is arguably an over-use of data types. Instead a more correct solution may be to

define, for example, a Clavicle class which has a relationship hasLaeralitySelector

LateralityVP, and this LateralityVP class has subclasses Left and Right. This Clavicle class

would then also have a hasLength property, relating to measurement. Such a

measurement would have two aspects to it: quantity (written as a “double” number type)

and measurement unit type (in this case, the SI unit of Metre). This would then enable to

describe which side of Clavicle is being described, and its length in terms of units. Using

the hasLeftClavicleLength data type as it is now, it simply records a value. This value is

arguably lacking in meaning because it does not record the unit of measurement. Thus to

describe length as a measurement, an ontology about the measurement domain should

be imported and used to reflect bone measurements in an ontologically recognized,

standardized way. The ontology was not updated with this suggestion as there was no

development time left to overhaul how bone measurements were being captured.

With the discovery of ancient Nubian time periods, and their relationships to ancient

Egyptian time periods, it was identified that other solutions could be employed to convey

this information. Instead of creating new Individuals of different names, but of said to be

identical, what could be done would be to create a singular time period and then add

multiple labels onto it, e.g. MiddleKingdom hasLabel MiddleKingdom. MiddleKingdom

Page 46: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

42

hasLabel MiddleNubia. This reduces the complexity of time periods which share the same

name by reducing the number of individuals created, so that they are easier to manage,

and that a single time period is being consistently used throughout.

The class Religion takes another step further in dealing with ontological complexities. The

author has defined my Religion class to have individuals with a data type of, hasGod

string. This means that the related god to the religion is simply stated. This can be a

problem because the word god means different things to different people. To an atheist,

Religions having the data type hasGod seems fine as he believes god does not really exist.

To a Christian, hasGod is wrong because he believes God exists and should then be

defined as a class. This then can be taken a step further because Christians worship one

God, but there are three parts to this one God – the Holy Trinity. One part of the Holy

Trinity is Jesus who was a man, a Person. The Person class is not defined to be a God

though. The ancient Greek and Roman Gods should then also be listed as their own class

too, and they should in turn be regarded as Female or Male. Greek and Roman mythology

share the same type of Gods, e.g. Zeus and Jupiter being the head Gods, respectively.

Perhaps then a new relationship should be defined between the two, Zeus isEquivalentOf

Jupiter.

In light of these complications, the Religion class was not changed and was left mainly as

a stub to be properly addressed perhaps sometime in the future.

4.3 Validation Summary

This chapter has discussed the validation for the constructed ontology through

researchers, to quantify how good or bad aspects were in terms of both ancient Nubian

content and ontological structure.

Page 47: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

43

5 Conclusions

The main aim of this dissertation has been to develop a standard on how to capture and

represent knowledge and information about ancient Nubian remains. The created

ontology represents an attempt to define this standard. To determine how close such a

goal has been met, the following topics should be taken into consideration.

5.1 EPR Relevance

The concept of what an EPR is and what sort of information is held within such records

were a template to being this investigation, as mentioned in Chapter 1. Relevant medical

information should be accurately recorded explicitly, in a consistent manner. This avoids

implicit knowledge, which would result in missing information. Missing information can

lead to studies becoming incomplete as data simply cannot be identified because it simply

does not exist.

A modern EPR is not entirely sufficient or appropriate to meet the needs for recording

ancient Nubian remains. When dealing with a modern patient, there is a greater emphasis

on treatment of disease. Patients live at an address, and receive treatment from

clinicians. Patients also have personal information to form unique identifiers, such as a

Surname, First Name, Date of Birth, Address, and NHS Number.

In contrast to a modern patient, a set of ancient Nubian remains can differ drastically.

They do not have an address in the traditional sense – they were held inside a grave,

which was part of a cemetery. Generally no treatment has been received, and can only be

figured out by looking at either bones or tissue samples. This is true for the diagnoses of

diseases. There are very little unique identifiers that can be used to simply identify a set

of remains – there is no name, no date of birth, no NHS number. Even the time period

Page 48: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

44

that the remains are from has to be determined from other archaeological evidence,

which casts doubt from even which century they are from.

Although ancient remains are very different in these aspects from a modern patient,

similarities can still be found. These ancient remains are of people that lived hundreds of

years ago. Even though lifestyles may be seen to be different from today’s modern age,

people still have suffered from the same types of disease. For example, schistosomiasis is

still very prevalent throughout Egypt – a parasitical disease spread through water of the

Nile. People still suffer from broken bones, but perhaps not in the same prevalence as in

ancient times. Those that live now to an elderly age still are beset by the same diseases

too, e.g. osteoarthritis.

If changed to accommodate a different emphasis on what information needs to be held,

EPRs are still a valid aim for ancient Nubian remains. An EPR created for this purpose is

effectively for a person who happened to die long ago, and is retrospectively putting that

person’s medical history together.

5.2 Literature Key Aspects

One key aspect found inside the physical books relating to the previously studied ancient

Nubian remains is about inconsistency. Remains can range from being described fully in

great detail over the course of paragraphs, measurements taken of all the bones, and

even photographs taken. Of other remains, barely even a word can be mentioned, and no

bone measurements are recorded. Everything in-between these two extremes are

possible. In addition, various potentially incorrect diagnosis are given. Through modern

forensic analysis, the sex of a set of remains is determined by primarily examining the

pelvic bones. The records found inside the physical books often are based upon markings

Page 49: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

45

on the grave, marks upon the skull bones, or size of individuals. These then inaccurately

determine the sex of the ancient remains. In addition to sex, height is another potential

measurement which is not recorded accurately. Modern forensics determines height

primarily through a function of femur length. The lengths of femurs can be missing on

ancient remains descriptions, and thus cannot be corrected.

Arguably another large hurdle to overcome, apart from the potential misdiagnosis or

incorrect recording of disease and bone measurements, is to do with racial diagnosis. The

initial research that was carried out, described in the physical books from early last

century, heavily spells out the theory of different races according to skull appearances

and measurements. These racial diagnoses are said to be wholly incorrect. Even at the

time of publication, the theories were not accepted and later proved to be entirely false.

That is not to say that such theories or diagnosis does not exist, though. Electronic

records should be able to capture all medical test and diagnosis made, by whom, and at

what time. If they are proved to be correct or incorrect, widely accepted or widely

rejected, then so be it – add such appropriate information explicitly.

Just as ancient remains lack unique identifiers, the same problem is faced for the graves

and cemeteries. A complexity arises because multiple ancient remains can be found in a

single grave. For example, if one grave is said to contain two sets of ancient remains, one

man and one woman, but then upon re-examining the remains it is revealed that in fact 3

women were contained inside the grave. Representing such a case in an ontology, or

indeed a database, is not a trivial task.

Page 50: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

46

5.3 Ontology complexity

Throughout the description of the ontology in Chapter 3 as well as the validation

discussion in Chapter 4 there is a clear theme throughout. The ontology regarding ancient

Nubian remains is complex because many different domains of knowledge have to be put

together to form a complete understanding.

Out of each and every section of the ontology, there is no absolutely simple way to give a

description. Site is a class that is arguably an awkward description of something that can

be easily understood in when speaking a language naturally – that the River Nile flows

through Egypt, Lake Nasser is part of the Nile because the Aswan dams have been built,

which has caused Cemetery Five at Biga to become inundated. The constructed ontology

does not meet this resolution of understanding, but rather instead covers the facts

superficially.

For other classes, people – including experts - can disagree on how classes should be

represented, or what the most correct (or rather, least wrong) way is. If areas of land can

have deep-rooted opinions on how countries and land-masses should be described, then

of course such conflicts arise from describing religions and god. Although for other classes

standards can be agreed upon, i.e. when it comes to SI units of measurement.

The issues of accurately describing Sites, Religion, and BodyPart measurements have

been identified but not totally fixed. Instead of completely addressing and solving the

problem, they have all been only partially resolved by covering all the basic information

and using it is a reasonable manner. E.g. Religion has individuals listed, which are all

associated with some God.

Page 51: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

47

Dr. Stevens gave an additional opinion that using Protégé-2000 was a good choice in

order to construct an ontology as it is fairly straightforward to use, as well as for choosing

to use the established Manchester OWL Syntax. That being the case, many changes would

be needed for the ontology to be of publishable standard to be shared globally. Firstly,

textual annotations should be used everywhere in order for users to fully understand the

intentions of what is being described. Secondly, all the Uniform Resource Identifiers

(URI)s should be converted into Resource Description Framework labels (RDFs) so that the

ontology can be read in an easier way, textually, in other graphical editor programs, as

well as through manual text editing.

5.4 Fit for purpose

If an electronic standard is to be defined to record ancient Nubian remains, it should be

publically available so that others, particularly experts from within the field, can critique

and identify which parts represent good and correct knowledge, and other parts which

are not and should be approved. An ontology fits this role very well because it can be

hosted as a simple file that can be downloaded. When opened through an editor, every

aspect of the ontology can be navigated – each class, object property, data property and

individual. An ontology can be just as easily edited and a newer version uploaded with

changes. If another party decides to take the ontology in a different direction, or describe

something differently, then an alternate ontology can be sat alongside the standard

ontology. If a newer standard is defined by the original or a new author, it can replace the

old standard effortlessly.

An important way to demonstrate how useful the ontology is to researchers is to explore

how easily it would be to link to current records that are kept within the KNH Centre.

Page 52: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

48

A replacement for the International Mummy Database and Tissue Bank is currently being

developed, so-called the Manchester Ancient Egyptian Biobank (MAEB). MAEB is a

computer system using a database to record existing information about tissue samples,

with its primary function to enable easy searching of Tissue Samples through uniquely

generated barcodes that can be printed for thousands of recorded tissue samples. A

sample includes information about where it was originally from, or what it actually is, as

well as where it currently is and where it has been in the past. The trouble with using such

a database is that there is no real demonstration of knowledge – if a sample was from a

grave in Cemetery Five, it would not explicitly mention that Cemetery Five is at Biga, and

currently submerged and unavailable to be travelled to. The ontology can still be of use

for MAEB because ontology concept IDs can be added to the database. For instance, if

Cemetery Five is entered as a row on the database as a source location for a grave that a

tissue sample was originally from, another field can be entered, e.g. “CemeteryFive”.

When searched in the ontology, this ID can be found, showing all the relevant information

about that particular cemetery and what in general the Cemetery class has been defined

as, with its relationships to other classes and data properties.

The same can work in reverse – the ontology can hold additional information relating to

which entries in the database that are in common. Using the a slightly different example,

if on the ontology a new data type property is defined for some ancient remains,

hasBarcode some String, then a particular set of ancient remains can hold the unique

database identifier. (Individual00000001 hasBarcode “G123.456”). If entered into MAEB,

this barcode then would bring up all the information for this tissue sample. Although this

works for a tissue sample such as for a bone, it is unlikely that something like a cemetery

Page 53: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

49

would have a barcode in the same manner – barcodes are being used to uniquely identify

tissue samples for improved storage and indexing. As such there is not an exact mapping

then from between a real-world software implementation and an ontological electronic

data standard. That being the case, this highlights the problem that exists of entirely

unique accession numbers not being used throughout to refer to ancient remains, graves,

and cemeteries.

5.5 Limitations

Although the ontology has been validated with researchers about ancient Nubian and

ontology knowledge there are still limitations to be dealt with.

Ontologies are traditionally rooted within computer science and so are not particularly

easily understood from persons outside of the discipline. If experts on ancient Nubia are

to be consulted regarding agreement on a standard, all aspects of what makes up an

ontology have to be fully understood. That is, users of the ontology have to be trained

and brought up to speed with knowledge is possible to be described, and how it can be

done.

Further validation is indeed required if a standard is to be agreed. Two researchers are

not enough, but fortunately Dr. David – a leading expert on ancient Egypt - will be able to

be interviewed regarding this ontology. Other experts from outside the KNH Centre

would be most welcome for opinions because often with experts from different

backgrounds, different opinions about what knowledge is correct can be voiced.

Since no other ontology on this subject has been created already, it is difficult to gauge

interest. An ontology might not already exist because simply other expert Egyptologists

Page 54: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

50

are unaware of the existence, or capability, of an ontology. Another reason might be for

the disinterest for defined electronic standards. If most studies are carried out only from

within a small community, so that critical information is identified arbitrarily without

further studies being performed or compared against one another, then the need for

electronic standards has been diminished. Even is such a standard was defined, there is

another question as to whether it would be adhered to or not. If other studies involving

similar remains are not capturing the similarly required essential information, future

ontologies that might be constructed may be incompatible.

5.6 Conclusions Summary

From weighing up the importance of why an electronic standard for capturing ancient

Nubian knowledge is useful, in conjunction with the issues of complexity and its

limitation, it can be said that the constructed ontology is an adequate solution. Although

its impact may be in question, as adherence or acceptance from external Egyptologists

towards a standard is unknown, the use-case of MAEB clearly demonstrates that linking

information to and from the ontology is possible, and can prove to be useful for

researchers looking up information about ancient remains. Although modelling problems

such as the most correct definition for a land area, or bone measurements have not been

elegantly solved the currently deployed less-correct definitions are something that can be

used and reasoned about.

The ontology is successfully classified through HermiT reasoned, and so can

computationally be proved to make sense structurally.

Page 55: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

51

6 Further Study

As mentioned in the first chapter, this project was to define an electronic data standard.

What this could mean for the future is discussed below.

6.1 Current work

The most similar work that is currently being carried out is to do with MAEB. MAEB is a

practical solution to managing large volumes of information in a more organised way so

that more accurate results through searching can be obtained, as well as for organising

tissue samples more accurately by generating unique barcodes.

In the previous chapter, it has been determined that the defined ontology for the data

standard has adequate functionality, and could feasibly be integrated with some data

held in MAEB and vice versa. Only a little extra development on both ends would be

required.

No other ancient Nubian or Egyptian ontologies exist, so there is no prospect of

integrating already defined domains into this ontology.

6.2 System Implementation

There is still a need to move away from physical copies of research books because there is

much too great a reliance placed upon them. If these records were to become further

damaged, lost, or destroyed then crucial information would be gone forever.

The first priority would be to fully digitize all books related to ancient Nubian reports. This

would enable the books to be kept mainly in storage so as to not be worn out further

through day-to-day reading. Furthermore, specific terms can be searched and found in

order to jump directly to the next relevant section, enabling increased accessibility to the

Page 56: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

52

information held inside the books. Currently, if browsing through a physical book, in-

depth knowledge of all the volumes in the series is required to properly identify which

sections to examine inside a book, or indeed what book to look through in the first place.

A fully functional hand-held scanner would be needed so as to not destroy the fragile

physical books, or a camera set-up correctly using a tripod to take consistently good

photographs. Scanned or snapped imaged could be saved in their raw format to produce

a PDF, and processed through OCR software so that text can be recognised for searching.

A practical software system could be run alongside the ontology, and MAEB, in order to

hold the information about remains described inside the physical books. This could be

achieved, for instance, using a Java Enterprise server running a Java (or MySQL,

PostgresSQL) database. Such a server could be accessible through a Java client, or

through a web-browser JavaServerPage. This would enable potentially global access of

the system, regardless of computer platform or location as long as an Internet connection

is present. The database would be designed based upon the ontology. Although the two

do not map up exactly one-to-one, important relationships can easily be identified and

ensured to be recorded correctly, e.g. a set of ancient remains is found within a Grave

One of Cemetery Five, and Cemetery Five is at Biga.

The accomplishment of digitizing all the records might be a long, tedious task as there are

hundreds of pages out of dozens of volumes to scan. Then if OCR is used, pages have to

be read manually to ensure that each word has been recognized correctly. Furthermore,

then all this information has to be entered then into the system to be stored in the

database. This is not so easily achieved either because even though the words may

already be in text format for computer software to parse over, the records themselves

Page 57: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

53

are very inconsistent. There are no unique identifiers for ancient remains, and various

bone measurements, disease diagnosis are not entered in a consistent systematic way.

The most accurate way to ensure all information is kept would be to enter the

information by hand. Again this would an arduous tedious task because there are perhaps

hundreds of ancient remains present in each cemetery.

Deployment of this system would not be a particular problem, as all is required is a

machine with access to the Internet, leaving the server running. The main problem would

be management from there on. If issues are discovered with the system, they would need

to be fixed by a systems developer or database administrator. If current functionality is

lacking, and further features are required, the software needs to be extended to cover

the future needs of users. Again this would require specialised computer knowledge.

Additional budget requirements would have to be requested from university IT services,

or through staff and students of the School of Computer Science.

6.3 Draft proposal

Once the ontology has been improved fully to a point where Dr. Stevens is entirely

satisfied with the structure, further validation can be made through Dr. David in terms of

content. Assuming that content is then updated satisfactorily, the ontology can be

submitted for further validation – to ancient Nubian and ontology experts from outside of

the university. Once a small group of experts have validated the ontology to a degree that

no mistakes are made, or information left out, endorsement should be obtained from

these researchers. With all this evidence for correct structure, content, and usefulness, an

article could be submitted to a forward-thinking Forensic or Egyptologist journal defining

a draft proposal for electronic standards about ancient (Nubian) remains.

Page 58: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

54

This proposal would have to adequately prove its correctness and usefulness to forensic

Egyptology studies through an explanation of is suitability, structure, content, and

validation. This article would invite other experts in the field to contribute to the

standard, sharing understanding and opinions about what is represented in a good way,

and what is not. If a consensus can be agreed throughout the community, then the

standard could be set and then adopted by future studies. If enough future studies

involve using the standard, then journals could require future study submissions to

adhere to these electronic standards.

There is some precedent to explore this draft proposal. In the community of micro-

biology, a number of years ago a group of biology researchers formed in order to

standardise micro-array experiment studies. They identified and started what information

should exactly be included as a minimum when performing such a study, in order to easily

follow, analyse, form conclusions and compare to other similar studies. The Minimum

Information About a Micro-array Experiment (MIAME) standard was drafted, and then is

now widely adopted throughout the community by researchers adhering to points laid

out, and journals requiring all relevant information to be present before publishing [18].

6.4 Further Study Summary

In summary, this project was originally planned to investigate the feasibility of creating

electronic standards for ancient Nubian Remains in order to represent information and

knowledge. Thorough investigation of this subject, both regarding ancient Egypt and

forensic Egyptology has taken place, with appropriate methods identified and carried out

by way of an ontology. This ontology was defined and validated by researchers for both

content about ancient Nubia and structure in terms of relationships. Problems and

Page 59: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

55

limitations were identified, as well as functionality for displaying knowledge. Even use

with another concurrent Egyptology computer project, MAEB, is possible without much

change. Success of the ontology has been contrasted against the issues found, and on

balance the ontology the ontology is an adequate first attempt at trying to formally

describe ancient remains from centuries ago, and how they are related to the ancient

time periods that such people lived in.

A PhD could be based upon this work, in order to fully design and implement a software

system, as outlined above, in addition to potential journal publications defining electronic

standards for ancient Nubian remains. This can be taken even a step further, and for

electronic standards to be defined for other kinds of ancient remains study, perhaps

outside of the Nubian region.

Page 60: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

56

Appendix 1

Prefix: xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> Prefix: owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> Prefix: xml: <http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace> Prefix: rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> Prefix: rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> Prefix: skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> Ontology: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl>Datatype: xsd:ID Datatype: xsd:decimal Datatype: xsd:gYear Datatype: xsd:string Datatype: xsd:double Datatype: xsd:integer ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasBurialPosition> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientHumanRemains>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPositionVP> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveOf> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientHumanRemains>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Grave>InverseOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAncientHumanRemains> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasVailidity> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPersonDiagnosis>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValidityVP> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLaterality> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BodyPart>Range:

<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LateralityVP> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isResearchedby> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientHumanRemains> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Diagnosis> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTest>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPerson> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isPerformedUsing> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTest>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BodyPart> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRemainsType> SubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRemainsType>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RemainsTypeVP> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCountry> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Region>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Country> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSex> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Person>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SexVP> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMainBurialPractice> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPracticeVP> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasConditionQuality> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.ow

l#AncientHumanRemains> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Artefact>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ConditionQualityVP> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAuthor> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#PublicationRecord>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImportantAncientPerson> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPerson> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCertainty> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Diagnosis>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CertaintyVP> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCemetery> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Town>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cemetery> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isGraveSiteOf> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Grave>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cemetery>InverseOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveSite> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasTreatmentOrigin> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTreatment>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DoctorIAP> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveType> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Grave>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GraveTypeVP>

Page 61: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

57

ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isDiagnosedFrom> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Diagnosis>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTest> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDiagnosis> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientHumanRemains>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Diagnosis> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSiteContents> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: InverseFunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Country>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#River> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Town> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveSite> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cemetery>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Grave>InverseOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isGraveSiteOf> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasBurialDressing> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientHumanRemains>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialDresingVP> ObjectProperty: owl:topObjectProperty ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCataract> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#River>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cataract> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDescriptionOrigin>

SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPerson>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#PublicationRecord> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasInjuryCause> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryDiagnosis>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryCauseVP> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasTreatment> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientHumanRemains>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTreatment> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasModernTimePeriod> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernPublicationRecord> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPerson>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernTimePeriod> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasBoneFractureType> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BoneFracture>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BoneFractureTypeVP> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMainReiligion> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Religion> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAncientHumanRemains> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Grave>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientHumanRemains>InverseOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveOf>

ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCompleteness> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientHumanRemains> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Artefact> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BodyPart>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CompletenessConditionVP> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLake> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#River>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Lake> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasInjurySeverity> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryDiagnosis>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjurySeverityVP> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRemainsContents> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RemainsTypeVP>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BodyPart> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAccessibility> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cemetery> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAncientTimePeriod> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPerson> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPublicationRecord>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMedicalTest> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientHumanRemains>Range:

Page 62: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

58

<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTest> ObjectProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDam> SubPropertyOf: owl:topObjectPropertyCharacteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#River>Range: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Dam> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCemeteryAccessionID> Domain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cemetery>Range: xsd:IDSubPropertyOf: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveAccessionID> Domain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Grave>Range: xsd:IDSubPropertyOf: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLeftFemurLength> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFemurMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMaxCraniumBreadth> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasHeight> SubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSigmoidNotchHeight> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightRadiusLength> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRadiusMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasWeightMeasurement>

SubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLeftOrbitLengthBreadth> Range: xsd:stringSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLengthMeasurement> SubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSide> SubPropertyOf: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasEthnicity> Range: xsd:stringSubPropertyOf: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFreeTextDescription> Range: xsd:stringSubPropertyOf: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasICD10> Range: xsd:stringSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasICD> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLeftTibiaLength> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasTibiaMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightOrbitLengthBreadth> Range: xsd:stringSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasClavicleMeasurement> SubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLengthMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAuricularHeight> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement>

DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFemurMeasurement> SubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLengthMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasBigonialBreadth> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLeftRadiusLength> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRadiusMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasNoseLengthBreadth> Range: xsd:stringSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMedicalCoding> Characteristics: FunctionalDomain: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Diagnosis>SubPropertyOf: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasTotalFacialHieght> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasPalateLengthBreadth> Range: xsd:stringSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLatitudeData> SubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLocationData> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLeftHumerusLength> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasHumerusMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMaxCraniumLength>

Page 63: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

59

Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSNOMED-CT> Range: xsd:stringSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMedicalCoding> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasREAD> Range: xsd:stringSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMedicalCoding> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasBizgomaticBreadth> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasTibiaMeasurement> SubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLengthMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasICD> SubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMedicalCoding> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAccessionID> Range: xsd:IDSubPropertyOf: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMinFrontalBreadth> Range: xsd:stringSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumCircumference> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMeasurement> SubPropertyOf: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasEndDate> Range: xsd:gYearSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDate>DisjointWith:

<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasStartDate> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLeftClavicleLength> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasClavicleMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> SubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLengthMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGod> SubPropertyOf: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasInterorbBreadth> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumHeight> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLocationData> SubPropertyOf: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAccessabilityStatus> Range: xsd:stringSubPropertyOf: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCranialBaseLength> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLongditudeData> SubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLocationData> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRadiusMeasurement> SubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLengthMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightTibiaLength>

Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasTibiaMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAge> Range: xsd:integerSubPropertyOf: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasICD9> Range: xsd:stringSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasICD> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDate> SubPropertyOf: owl:topDataProperty DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightClavicleLength> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasClavicleMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSymphysisMentiHeight> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasHumerusMeasurement> SubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLengthMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCranialCapacity> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightFemurLength> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFemurMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasUpperFacialHeight> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFacialBaseLength> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumMeasurement>

Page 64: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

60

DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightHumerusLength> Range: xsd:doubleSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasHumerusMeasurement> DataProperty: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasStartDate> Range: xsd:gYearSubPropertyOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDate>DisjointWith: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasEndDate> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Vertabra> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BackBone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DNAsequenceMedicalTest> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTest> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Certain> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CertaintyVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#TimePeriod>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMainBurialPractice> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPracticeVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMainReiligion> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Religion>DisjointWith: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernTimePeriod> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BoneFracture> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryDiagnosis>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasBoneFractureType> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BoneFractureTypeVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.ow

l#isDiagnosedFrom> only (<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingPhotograph> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingXray>) Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DentalProblem> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SexDiagnosis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPersonDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Dam> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Site> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Osteoarthritis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DegenerativeDisease>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isDiagnosedFrom> only (<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingPhotograph> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingXray>)DisjointWith: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Spondylitis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Spondylitis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DegenerativeDisease>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isDiagnosedFrom> only (<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingPhotograph> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingXray>), <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasICD9> value "721.90"DisjointWith: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Osteoarthritis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SexVP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValuePartition>

Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjurySeverityUnhealed> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjurySeverityVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Bowl> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Artefact> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CatBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AnimalRemains> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ArmBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Bone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LeftLaterality> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LateralityVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryCauseOccupational> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryCauseVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientJewellery> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Artefact> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Schistosomiasis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InfectiousDisease> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LateralityVP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValuePartition> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Tooth> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.ow

Page 65: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

61

l#BodyPart>DisjointWith: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Bone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#FullyComplete> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CompletenessConditionVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#NameDiagnosis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPersonDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjurySeverityFatal> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjurySeverityVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPublicationRecord> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#PublicationRecord>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAncientTimePeriod> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAuthor> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImportantAncientPerson>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAncientTimePeriod> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAuthor> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImportantAncientPerson> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Brain> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BodyPart> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Bone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BodyPart>DisjointWith: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Tooth>

Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SupraOrbitalForamen> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkullBone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DentalAbscess> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DentalProblem> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkullBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Bone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BoneFractureSpiral> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BoneFractureTypeVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryCauseShield> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#War> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkeletonRemains> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RemainsTypeVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRemainsContents> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Bone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CompletenessConditionVP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValuePartition> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Clavicle> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ChestBone>DisjointWith: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Rib> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPerson> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.ow

l#Person>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAncientTimePeriod> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDescriptionOrigin> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#PublicationRecord>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAncientTimePeriod> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLocationData> some xsd:string Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LegBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Bone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#IndeterminateValidity> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValidityVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cemetery> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Site>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveSite> min 1 <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Grave>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCemeteryAccessionID> some xsd:ID Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LegsStright> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPositionVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryCauseSpear> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#War> Class: owl:Thing Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjurySeverityHealed> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjurySeverityVP>

Page 66: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

62

Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingMRIscan> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingMedicalTest> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTest> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isPerformedUsing> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BodyPart>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isResearchedby> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPerson>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isResearchedby> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPerson>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFreeTextDescription> some xsd:string Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Ulna> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ArmBone>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLaterality> only (<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LeftLaterality> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RightLaterality>) Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernTimePeriod> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#TimePeriod>DisjointWith: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ConditionQualityVP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValuePartition> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#FootBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LegBone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryCauseParasite>

SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryCauseVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Unwrapped> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialDresingVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LyingFaceUp> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPositionVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Artefact> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCompleteness> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CompletenessConditionVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasConditionQuality> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ConditionQualityVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFreeTextDescription> some xsd:string, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLocationData> some xsd:string Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BackBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Bone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#PartiallyComplete> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CompletenessConditionVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Heart> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BodyPart> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#PhotographRecord> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernPublicationRecord> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DegenerativeDisease>

SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Pronate> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPositionVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#TimePeriod> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasEndDate> some xsd:gYear, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFreeTextDescription> some xsd:string, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasStartDate> some xsd:gYear Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Papyrus> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPublicationRecord> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryCauseVP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValuePartition> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValuePartition> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernPublicationRecord> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#PublicationRecord>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAuthor> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPerson>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasModernTimePeriod> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernPublicationRecord>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAuthor> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPerson>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasModernTimePeriod> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernTimePeriod>

Page 67: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

63

Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Tuberculosis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InfectiousDisease> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InfectiousDisease> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BodyPart> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCompleteness> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CompletenessConditionVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLaterality> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LateralityVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchBook> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernPublicationRecord> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LyingFaceDown> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPositionVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#NasalBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkullBone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CertaintyVP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValuePartition> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Valid> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValidityVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AlveolarAbscess>

SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InfectiousDisease> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#PublicationRecord> EquivalentTo: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPublicationRecord> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernPublicationRecord>SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFreeTextDescription> some xsd:string Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTreatment> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasTreatmentOrigin> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DoctorIAP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasTreatmentOrigin> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DoctorIAP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFreeTextDescription> some xsd:string Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientHumanRemains> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPerson>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasBurialDressing> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialDresingVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasBurialPosition> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPositionVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCompleteness> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CompletenessConditionVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasConditionQuality> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ConditionQualityVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDiagnosis> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Diagnosis>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMedicalTest> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTest>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRemainsType> some

<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RemainsTypeVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasTreatment> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTreatment>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRemainsType> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RemainsTypeVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ZygomaticBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkullBone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AnimalRemains> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Artefact> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Lake> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Site> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#War> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryCauseVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#FishBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AnimalRemains> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cranium> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkullBone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Tibia> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LegBone>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLaterality> only (<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LeftLaterality> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RightLaterality>)

Page 68: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

64

Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#TombGrave> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GraveTypeVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Humerus> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ArmBone>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLaterality> only (<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LeftLaterality> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RightLaterality>) Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPersonDiagnosis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Diagnosis>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasVailidity> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValidityVP>DisjointWith: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RelationshipDiagnosis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPersonDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ArmsCrossed> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPositionVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GraveTypeVP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValuePartition> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Diagnosis> SubClassOf: owl:Thing, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCertainty> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CertaintyVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isDiagnosedFrom> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.ow

l#MedicalTest>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isResearchedby> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPerson>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isResearchedby> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPerson>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFreeTextDescription> some xsd:string, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMedicalCoding> some xsd:string Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BoneFractureTypeVP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValuePartition> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cataract> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Site> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImmunoCytoChemistryMedicalTest> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTest> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPositionVP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPracticeVP>DisjointWith: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialDresingVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#HandBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ArmBone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#OccupationDiagnosis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPersonDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Splint> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTreatment>

Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Fibula> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LegBone>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLaterality> only (<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LeftLaterality> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RightLaterality>) Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryCauseArrow> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#War> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#WeightDiagnosis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPersonDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Drawing> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernPublicationRecord> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValidityVP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValuePartition> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Radius> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ArmBone>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLaterality> only (<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LeftLaterality> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RightLaterality>) Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Rib> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ChestBone>DisjointWith: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Clavicle> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Hieroglyphs>

Page 69: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

65

SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPublicationRecord> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#FrontalBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkullBone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientClothing> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Artefact> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DentalDiagnosis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPersonDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#EthnicityDiagnosis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPersonDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Pot> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Artefact> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Male> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SexVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MummyRemains> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RemainsTypeVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Drug> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTreatment> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#PhysicalAppearanceDiagnosis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPersonDiagnosis>

Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Liver> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BodyPart> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryCauseSword> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#War> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Wrapped> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialDresingVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RightLaterality> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LateralityVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingCTscan> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingMedicalTest> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#HistologyMedicalTest> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTest> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ConditionMedium> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ConditionQualityVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Person> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSex> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SexVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFreeTextDescription> some xsd:string Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BirdBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AnimalRemains>

Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialDresingVP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPracticeVP>DisjointWith: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPositionVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPerson> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Person>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasModernTimePeriod> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernTimePeriod>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasModernTimePeriod> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernTimePeriod> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPaper> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernPublicationRecord> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#HeightDiagnosis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPersonDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Country> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Site>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSiteContents> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#River>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSiteContents> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Town> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Region> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Site>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCountry> min 1 <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Country>

Page 70: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

66

Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ChestBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Bone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Uncertain> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CertaintyVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SphenoidBone> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkullBone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AgeDiagnosis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPersonDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Femur> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LegBone>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLaterality> only (<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LeftLaterality> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RightLaterality>) Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Invalid> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValidityVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Noose> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Artefact> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BoneFractureCompound> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BoneFractureTypeVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ConditionGood>

SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ConditionQualityVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#EndoscopyMedicalTest> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTest> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#River> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Site>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCataract> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cataract>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDam> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Dam>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLake> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Lake> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ShallowGrave> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GraveTypeVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Site> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFreeTextDescription> some xsd:string, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLocationData> some xsd:string Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingPhotograph> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingMedicalTest> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ManchesterAncientEgyptianBioBank> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernPublicationRecord> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Town> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Site>

Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingXray> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingMedicalTest> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Religion> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGod> some xsd:string Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Glabella> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkullBone> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Grave> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Site>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAncientHumanRemains> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientHumanRemains>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveType> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GraveTypeVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveType> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GraveTypeVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveAccessionID> some xsd:ID Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryDiagnosis> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Diagnosis>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasInjuryCause> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryCauseVP>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasInjurySeverity> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjurySeverityVP>DisjointWith: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPersonDiagnosis> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPracticeVP> EquivalentTo: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.ow

Page 71: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

67

l#BurialDresingVP> or <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BurialPositionVP>SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValuePartition> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Plant> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Artefact> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RemainsTypeVP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValuePartition>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRemainsContents> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BodyPart> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjuryCauseExecutioner> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#War> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImportantAncientPerson> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientPerson> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ConditionBad> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ConditionQualityVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#NotAtAllComplete> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CompletenessConditionVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingMedicalTest> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTest> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DoctorIAP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImportantAncientPerson>

Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Female> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SexVP> Class: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InjurySeverityVP> SubClassOf: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ValuePartition> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MoslemPeriod> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMainReiligion> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Islam> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MiddleKingdom> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#C-group>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MiddleNubian>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#TwelfthDynastyNubian> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#TwelfthDynastyNubian> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#C-group>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MiddleKingdom>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MiddleNubian> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientGreekMythology> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Religion>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGod> "Zeus" Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Zeus>

Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CemeteryThree> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cemetery> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LakeNasser> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Lake> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GraveFive-7> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Grave>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveType> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ShallowGrave>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveType> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ShallowGrave>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAncientHumanRemains> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Individual00000007A>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveAccessionID> "7"@ Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GeorgeAndrewReisner> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPerson>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSex> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Male>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSex> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Male>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasModernTimePeriod> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#19thCenturyAD>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasModernTimePeriod> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#20thCenturyAD> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Biga> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.ow

Page 72: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

68

l#Town>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCemetery> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CemeteryFive> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Coptic> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ChristianPeriod> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#A-group> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#EarlyDynasticPeriod>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ProtoDynasticPeriod> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Egypt> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Country>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSiteContents> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Biga>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSiteContents> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RiverNile> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ArchaicNubian> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#B-group>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#OldKingdom>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#OldNubian> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GraveFive-1> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Grave>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveType> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ShallowGrave>,

<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveType> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ShallowGrave>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAncientHumanRemains> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Individual00000001>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveAccessionID> "1"^^xsd:ID Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#HGLyons> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPerson>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSex> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Male>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSex> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Male>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasModernTimePeriod> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#19thCenturyAD>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasModernTimePeriod> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#20thCenturyAD> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SixthNileCataract> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cataract> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#X-group> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Byzantine-PaganPeriod> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Christitanity> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Religion>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGod> "Jesus" Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Ptolmaeic-RomanPeriod> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.ow

l#AncientTimePeriod>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMainReiligion> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientRomanMythology> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#PredynasticPeriod> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Nubia> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Region>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCountry> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Egypt>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCountry> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Sudan> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CemeteryFive> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cemetery>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveSite> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GraveFive-1>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveSite> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GraveFive-7>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAccessabilityStatus> "Submerged", <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCemeteryAccessionID> "5"^^xsd:ID, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFreeTextDescription> "Cemetery 5 was situated in a depression on the eastern side of the island of Biga, alongside the Biga temple and directly facing Philae. It was a Christian burial-place in which more than five hundred bodies had been interred. Many of these were the remains of some foreign people, others were those of local Nubians and Egyptians, and there were a considerable number of hybrids of these different racial types.", <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLatitudeData> "32.886626", <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLongditudeData> "24.021111" Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Islam> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.ow

Page 73: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

69

l#Religion>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGod> "Allah" Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#FirstNileCataract> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cataract> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AswanHighDam> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Dam> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Sudan> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Country>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSiteContents> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RiverNile> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#NewEmpire> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#NewKingdom> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#19thCenturyAD> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernTimePeriod>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasEndDate> "1899"^^xsd:gYear, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasStartDate> "1800"^^xsd:gYear Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ProtoDynasticPeriod> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#A-group>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#EarlyDynasticPeriod> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#21stCenturyAD> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernTimePeriod>Facts:

<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasEndDate> "2099"^^xsd:gYear, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasStartDate> "2000"^^xsd:gYear Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Individual00000007A> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientHumanRemains>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDiagnosis> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BoneFracture>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRemainsType> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BoneFracture>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRemainsType> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkeletonRemains>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSex> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Female>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDiagnosis> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BoneFracture>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRemainsType> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkeletonRemains>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSex> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Female>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAncientTimePeriod> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MiddleNubian>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDescriptionOrigin> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#The_archaeological_survey_of_Nubia._Report_for_1907-8>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isResearchedby> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GeorgeAndrewReisner>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAuricularHeight> 108, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCranialBaseLength> 102, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumCircumference> 520, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumHeight> 124, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.ow

l#hasFacialBaseLength> 88, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFacialBaseLength> 92, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFreeTextDescription> "A middle-aged woman 1-486 metres in height; long, straight, dark hair intermingled with white; coronal and sagittal sutures partly obliterated; orbits square, somewhat oblique and moderately far apart: exceptionally prominent supra-orbital ridges for a woman's skull; cranium a large ovoid, with marked obelic flattening; face also ovoid, with no trace of Negro influence; malar suture joins the infra-orbital suture on both sides. Dental abscess around the roots of R. pm2 and ml opening on palate and face. Smaller abscesses around other carious teeth. Fracture of humerus."@, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasInterorbBreadth> 27.5, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLeftClavicleLength> 135, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLeftFemurLength> 437, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLeftHumerusLength> 248, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLeftHumerusLength> 313, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLeftOrbitLengthBreadth> "40 x 33", <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMaxCraniumBreadth> 136, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMaxCraniumLength> 182, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasNoseLengthBreadth> "48 x 25", <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasPalateLengthBreadth> "46 x 39", <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightClavicleLength> 133, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightFemurLength> 436, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightHumerusLength> 313, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightOrbitLengthBreadth> "40 x 33", <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSigmoidNotchHeight> 48, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSymphysisMentiHeight> 33, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasTotalFacialHieght> 115, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasUpperFacialHeight> 68DifferentFrom: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Individual00000001> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RosalieDavid> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchPerson>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSex> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.ow

Page 74: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

70

l#Female>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSex> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Female> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AswanLowDam> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Dam> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#OldNubian> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ArchaicNubian>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#B-group>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#OldKingdom> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#B-group> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ArchaicNubian>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#OldKingdom>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#OldNubian> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#C-group> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MiddleKingdom>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MiddleNubian>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#TwelfthDynastyNubian> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ThirdNileCataract> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cataract> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Individual00000001> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientHumanRemains>,

<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasBurialDressing> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Unwrapped>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCompleteness> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#PartiallyComplete>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDiagnosis> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Spondylitis>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRemainsType> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkeletonRemains>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSex> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Male>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCompleteness> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#PartiallyComplete>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDiagnosis> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Spondylitis>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRemainsType> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkeletonRemains>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSex> only <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Male>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAncientTimePeriod> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MiddleNubian>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDescriptionOrigin> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#The_archaeological_survey_of_Nubia._Report_for_1907-8>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#isResearchedby> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GeorgeAndrewReisner>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasBigonialBreadth> 105, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasBizgomaticBreadth> 140, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCranialBaseLength> 104, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCranialCapacity> 1750, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCraniumHeight> 128, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.ow

l#hasFacialBaseLength> 97, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFreeTextDescription> "An old white-haired man with the alien type of broad beloid or sphenoid cranium characteristic of the people buried in thin cemetery; abort broad face; all upper teeth gone ; in the lower jaw all the molars and the left second incisor gone; all the premolars carious. Of the cranial sutures the lambdoid and the right half of the coronal are obliterated. Complete ankylosis of the sternum and ossification of the perichondrium of the first left costal cartilage. Pronounced superciliary ridges. Oval oblique orbits. Pronounced spondylitis.", <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasInterorbBreadth> 25, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLeftOrbitLengthBreadth> "42 x 38", <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMaxCraniumBreadth> 150, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMaxCraniumLength> 195, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasNoseLengthBreadth> "50 x 26", <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasPalateLengthBreadth> "49 x 43", <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightClavicleLength> 150, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightFemurLength> 449, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightHumerusLength> 234, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasRightOrbitLengthBreadth> "43 x 36", <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSigmoidNotchHeight> 54, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasSymphysisMentiHeight> 35, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasTotalFacialHieght> 93, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasUpperFacialHeight> 70DifferentFrom: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Individual00000007A> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MiddleNubian> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasBurialPosition> some <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LegsStright>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMainReiligion> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientEgyptianMythology>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasEndDate> "1781 BC"@, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasStartDate> "2066 BC"@SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#C-group>,

Page 75: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

71

<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MiddleKingdom>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#TwelfthDynastyNubian> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#The_archaeological_survey_of_Nubia._Report_for_1907-8> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ResearchBook>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAuthor> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#GeorgeAndrewReisner>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAuthor> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#HGLyons> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CemeteryFour> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cemetery> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#EarlyDynasticPeriod> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#A-group>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ProtoDynasticPeriod> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SunGod> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CemeteryTwo> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cemetery> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ChristianPeriod> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMainReiligion> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Christitanity>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Coptic> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SecondNileCataract>

Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cataract> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#OldKingdom> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ArchaicNubian>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#B-group>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#OldNubian> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#NewKingdom> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#NewEmpire> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Byzantine-PaganPeriod> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientTimePeriod>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMainReiligion> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientGreekMythology>SameAs: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#X-group> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ForthNileCataract> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cataract> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CemeteryOne> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cemetery>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasAccessionID> "1"^^xsd:ID Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#FifthNileCataract> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cataract> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RiverNile>

Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#River>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCataract> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#FifthNileCataract>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCataract> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#FirstNileCataract>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCataract> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ForthNileCataract>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCataract> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SecondNileCataract>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCataract> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SixthNileCataract>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCataract> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ThirdNileCataract>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDam> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AswanHighDam>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDam> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AswanLowDam>, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasLake> <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LakeNasser> Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#20thCenturyAD> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ModernTimePeriod>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasEndDate> "1999"^^xsd:gYear, <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasStartDate> "1900"^^xsd:gYear Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientEgyptianMythology> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Religion>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGod> "Sun God"

Page 76: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

72

Individual: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientRomanMythology> Types: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Religion>Facts: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGod> "Jupiter" DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientClothing>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AncientJewellery>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AnimalRemains>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Bowl>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Noose>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Plant>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Pot> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BirdBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#CatBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#FishBone> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#HandBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Humerus>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Radius>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Ulna> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Femur>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Fibula>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#FootBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Tibia> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Bone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Brain>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Tooth> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingCTscan>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingMRIscan>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingPhotograph>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ImagingXray> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#FrontalBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Glabella>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#NasalBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SphenoidBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SupraOrbitalForamen>

,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ZygomaticBone> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Artefact>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BodyPart>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTest>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#MedicalTreatment>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Person>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Site> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cataract>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cemetery>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Country>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Dam>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Grave>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Lake>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Region>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#River> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BoneFracture>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DegenerativeDisease>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DentalProblem>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#InfectiousDisease> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AgeDiagnosis>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#DentalDiagnosis>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#EthnicityDiagnosis>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#HeightDiagnosis>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#NameDiagnosis>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#OccupationDiagnosis>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#PhysicalAppearanceDiagnosis>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#RelationshipDiagnosis>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SexDiagnosis>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#WeightDiagnosis> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Bone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Brain>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Heart>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Liver>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Tooth> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ArmBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#BackBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ChestBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies

/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#LegBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SkullBone> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Cranium>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#FrontalBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Glabella>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#NasalBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SphenoidBone>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#SupraOrbitalForamen>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#ZygomaticBone> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#AlveolarAbscess>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Schistosomiasis>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Tuberculosis> DisjointClasses: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#IndeterminateValidity>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Invalid>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#Valid> DisjointProperties: <http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasCemeteryAccessionID>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasDate>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasFreeTextDescription>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasGraveAccessionID>,<http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2010/6/AncientNubia1280094080171.owl#hasMeasurement>

Page 77: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

73

References

1. Shinnie, P. L. (Peter Lewis) (1996). Ancient Nubia.: London: Kegan Paul International.

2. Arthur C. Aufderheide (2002). The Scientific Study of Mummies.: Cambridge University Press.

3. H G Lyons (1910). The archaeological survey of Nubia. Report for 1907-8, Volume I: Archaeological report.: Cairo, National Printing Department.

4. Bourke JB. (1971). The palaeopathology of the vertebral column in ancient Egypt and Nubia.. Med Hist., 15(4), 363-375.

5. Richard Hillestad, James Bigelow, Anthony Bower, Federico Girosi, Robin Meili, Richard Scoville, and Roger Taylor (2005). Can ElectronicMedical Record Systems Transform Health Care? Potential Health Benefits, Savings, And Costs.. Health Affairs, 24(5), 1103-1117.

6. Tim Benson (2009). Principles of Health Interoperability HL7 and SNOMED (Health Informatics).: Springer

7. Jones AJ, Hart A, Henwood F, and Gerhardt C. (2003 The use of electronic patient records (EPRs) in the maternity services: professional and public acceptability. Brighton: University of Brighton, 1-14.

8. Natalya F. Noy and Deborah L. McGuinness. (2001, January 3). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology.: Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880.

9. Mark A. Musen (1992). Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse. Computers and Biomedical Research, 25(5), 435-467.

10. CO-ODE (2009, January 8). The Manchester OWL Syntax. 11. Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (2010, July 30). Protégé 4.1. 12. MySQL (2010, January 1). MySQL. 13. PostgresSQL (2010, January 1). PostgresSQL. 14. ABBYY (2010, July 1). ABBYY FineReader 10. 15. Dr Jenefer Anne Cockitt (2010). Dr Jenefer Anne Cockitt. 16. H G Lyons (1910). The archaeological survey of Nubia. Report for 1908-9, Volume

I: Archaeological report.: Cairo, National Printing Department. 17. Dr.Robert Stevens (2010). Dr.Robert Stevens. 18. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, Aach J,

Ansorge W, Ball CA, Causton HC, Gaasterland T, Glenisson P, Holstege FC, Kim IF, Markowitz V, Matese JC, Parkinson H, Robinson A, Sarkans U, Schulze-Kremer S, Stewart (2006). Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data.. Nat Genet., Oct(10), 1089

Page 78: 2010 TOBIAS TERNENT SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE · 2010-12-06 · 20th century, through written records and publications. Now in the 21st century, there is a renewed effort to re-examine

74

Bibliography

Winston Churchill (1899). The River War: An Historical Account of the Reconquest of the Soudan.: Longmans, Green and Co.. Mark Dingemanse (2005, April 17). The Nubia region today. Bourke JB. (1971). The palaeopathology of the vertebral column in ancient Egypt and Nubia.. Med Hist., 15(4), 363-375. Richard Hillestad, James Bigelow, Anthony Bower, Federico Girosi, Robin Meili, Richard Scoville, and Roger Taylor (2005). Can ElectronicMedical Record Systems Transform Health Care? Potential Health Benefits, Savings, And Costs.. Health Affairs, 24(5), 1103-1117. eHealth Insider (2010, June 5). Kainos launches EDMS from Ipswich trial. Kainos (2010, January 5). Kainos - EDRM | Document Management | Records Management. A. Rosalie David (2008). Egyptian Mummies and Modern Science. Patricia I. Lambert-Zazulak, Patricia Rutherford and A. Rosalie David (2003). The International Ancient Egyptian Mummy Tissue Bank at the Manchester Museum as a resource for the palaeoepidemiological study of schistosomiasis.. World Archaeology, 35(2), 223-240. H A Waldron (2000). The Study of the Human Remains from Nubia: The Contribution of Grafton Elliot Smith and his Colleagues to Palaeopathology. Medical History, 44(1), 363-388. Annalisa Alvrus (1999). Fracture Patterns Among the Nubians of Semna South, Sudanese Nubia. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 9(6), 417-429. Andrews JE, Patrick TB, Richesson RL, Brown H, Krischer JP. (2008). Comparing heterogeneous SNOMED CT coding of clinical research concepts by examining normalized expressions.. J Biomed Inform., 41(6), 1062-1069. NHS Connecting for Health (2002, January 1). SNOMED CT - the language of the NHS Care Records Service. World Health Organization (2007, January 1). ICD-10. de Lusignan S, Minmagh C, Kennedy J, Zeimet M, Bommezijn H, Bryant J. (2001). A survey to identify the clinical coding and classification systems currently in use across Europe.. Stud Health Technol Inform., 84(1), 86-89. EMBL-EBI (2010, March 1). EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database. J. B. Malone, M. S. Abdel-Rahman, M. M. El Bahy, O. K. Huh, M. Shafik and M. Bavia (1997). Geographic information systems and the distribution of Schistosoma mansoni in the Nile delta. Parasitology Today, 13(3), 112-119. Andrei Mikheev, Marc Moens and Claire Grover (1999). Named Entity Recognition without Gazetteers. National Cancer Institute (2009, January 31). SNOMED CT. eHealth (2009, January 1). SNOMED-CT. Christian Jackowski, MD, Stephan Bolliger, MD and Michael J Thali, MD (2008). Common and Unexpected Findings in Mummies from Ancient Egypt and South America as Revealed by CT.. RadioGraphics, 28(1), 1477-1492. Sue Bowman, RHIA (2005). Coordination of SNOMED-CT and ICD-10: Getting the Most out of Electronic Health Record Systems. Perspectives in Health Information Management, Spring(1), 1-8.