2011-10-10_vertical drilling weekly - d. gacicia
TRANSCRIPT
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
1
Vertical Drilling Weekly
North American Risks Lead Our Forecasts Lower Ratings unchanged, lowering our estimates and price targets. We are
lowering our estimates and price targets across oil service shares to reflect heightened risk to upstream activity from North American operators due to moderating commodity prices, decelerating upstream cash flows, and tighter capital markets. Although negative estimate revisions may lead volatility to persist in oil services shares, we see lowered expectations largely discounted into shares that have fallen 30-50% since July. Given that current valuations screen attractively against reduced earnings estimates, lower growth, and higher risk adjusted forecasts and price targets, we anticipate oil services shares will trade higher into the end of the year. We continue to like SLB and BHI in large caps, DRQ and NBR in small/mid. caps, and RIG, SDRL, and DO among offshore drillers.
North American activity at risk from tougher conditions. Our estimate
revisions largely reflect risks to North American activity from smaller operators in the face of lower cash flows from weakening commodity prices, funding gaps for their spending plans, and reduced access to capital from risk-averse capital markets. To reflect these risks, we are lowering our 2012 North American rig count forecast. (pgs. 3 & 12)
Pressure pumping sees biggest risk from slower growth. With pressure
pumping capacity growing from 10m HP in 1Q11 to over 17m HP by the end of 2012 according to our bottoms up analysis, we see the market reaching a balance in mid-2012 under our reduced rig count forecast. As supply balances demand, we anticipate the market will maintain its service intensity, but yield its pricing gains garnered since 2009, leading estimates lower.
Conclusion of 2011 North American budget campaigns may prove a negative catalyst. We see a rally in oversold oil services shares into the end of the year, as the impetus to spend the remainder of 2011 budgets may support 4Q11 North American activity and ease concerns of fearful investors. If WTI prices continue to hover just above project breakeven levels in the $70-$80 range, European credit concerns continue to tighten capital markets, and funding gaps persist, 2012 budgets may arrive with more cautious spending targets. If so, a deceleration of upstream activity and rig counts may arrive in 1Q12, creating a negative catalyst for oil service shares.
International activity outlook more stable. Aside from the UK, where a crop
of E&P companies need financing to develop prospects in the North Sea, we see less risk to international upstream activity from funding gaps and financing needs in tighter capital markets. Cash flow support from higher Brent prices and prospect of spending from larger, better capitalized independent oil companies, national oil companies, and OPEC members looking to maintain spare capacity suggest a positive trajectory for upstream spending. Meanwhile, strong tendering for offshore rigs in international basins continues to provide comfort for our positive international outlook.
October 10, 2011
Table of Contents Overview 1 Feature: Reflecting Risk in Estimates 2 Coverage Synopsis 8 Global Rig Count 9 Charting Global Rig Count 10 Global Rig Count & Oil Production 11 Global Rig Count Forecast 12 Global Jackup Market 13 Jackup Dayrate Analysis &Forecast 14 Global Deepwater Markets 15 Global Midwater Market 16 Cum. Rig Demand by Classification 17 Incremental Tendering & Demand 18 Floater Dayrate Analysis & Forecast 19 Jackup Fleet Expansion 20 Floater Fleet Expansion 21 Offshore Driller Valuation Methodology 22 Dividend Yield-Based Valuations 23 North American Natural Gas 24 Global Oil Markets 25 Key Oil Market Metrics 26 Global Oil Demand & Economics 27 Oil in Transit 28 US Oil Demand & Oil Stocks 29 Global Oil Stocks and Refining Margins 30 Earnings Summary 31 Valuation Summary 32 Valuation Summary – Price Targets 33 Tracking Oil Service Sector Options 34 A View From Debt Markets 35 Estimate Revisions 36 Trading Analysis 37 Sector Performance Summary 38 Estimate Revisions 31 Price Target Revisions 7
Darren Gacicia +1-203-276-5664 [email protected]
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
2
Key Upstream Spending Drivers: Cash Flow, CAPEX, & Funding Status
Higher Commodity Price Drive Cash Flows
Source: Factset, Vertical Research Partners Cash Flow & CAPEX Well Correlated
Source: Factset, Vertical Research Partners Upstream Spending May Fall to Narrow Funding Gaps
Source: Factset, Vertical Research Partners Note: Charts on page 2 & 3 include data from the following set of companies: APA, APC, BEXP, CHK, COG, COP, CLR, CVX, CXO, DNR, DVN, ECA, EOG, HES, HK, MRO, MUR, NBL, NFX, NXY, OXY, PXD, QEP, RDSA, RRC, STO, SU, SWN, TOT, UPL, WLL, XEC, XOM, EQT, FST, STR. KWK, SD, SM, TLM, WMB
Upstream Cash Flow Leveraged to Oil
Source: Factset, Vertical Research Partners
Unconventional plays drive paradigm shift, as oil drove cash flows & investment. Exploration success within politically stable US and Canada, in combination with high production rates and rising oil prices, translated into positive economics for unconventional plays. North American E&Ps shifted their focus toward unconventional plays, new companies emerged on the back of advantageous acreage holdings, and the Majors shifted attention toward booking domestic reserves. International companies & NOCs entered the North American market to fund joint ventures as means of participating in potential upside and gaining expertise they may export to international opportunities. As cash flows rose with oil prices and capital flooded into the sector, a number of smaller operators found funding to pursue new project to de-risk assets. Given access to capital markets and/or JV partners for funding to develop reserves, as well as prospects to sell to larger competitors, exploration from smaller players supported North American rig count growth. Cash flow & capital market constraints overhang the market’s current operating model. As WTI oil prices hover near project “break even” levels and European debt issues likely tighten credit markets, we see risk to the market relationships that drove recent upstream activity in North America. As illustrated above, companies with leverage to oil production are better able to internally fund their upstream CAPEX programs. As oil prices moderate, cash flows should become more constrained, likely curtailing upstream spending (CAPEX), correlated with cash flow. Similar to 2008/2009, widening funding gaps for the industry, without support from capital markets and industry funding sources, will drive CAPEX back to levels that funded by internal cash flows. Again, if present activity follows the script from 2008/2009, the impetus to spend through 2011 budgets may mask this change in tide during 4Q11, but poses a risk to a correction in activity as the market crossed over to the 2012 budgeting year.
R² = 0.81
0102030405060708090
100110120130140150160
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
WTI
($/b
bl)
CFO (Indexed)
R² = 0.78
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0 200 400 600 800 1000
CFO
(Ind
exed
)
CAPEX (Indexed)
020406080100120140160180200220240260
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
1Q06
2Q06
3Q06
4Q06
1Q07
2Q07
3Q07
4Q07
1Q08
2Q08
3Q08
4Q08
1Q09
2Q09
3Q09
4Q09
1Q10
2Q10
3Q10
4Q10
1Q11
2Q11
CAE
PX (I
ndex
ed)
Fund
ing
Stat
us (C
FO /
CAP
EX)
Funding Status CAPEX
2008/2009 fall in oil prices has a negative impact on Upstream fund and CAPEX
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
CFO
/CAP
EX
% Oil Production
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
3
De-Risking North American Rig Count Growth
Tight Credit Markets Dangerous of US Rig Count
Source: Bloomberg, Baker Hughes, Vertical Research Partners
Small Cap. Names Host Bigger Funding Gaps
Source: Factset, Vertical Research Partners
Leverage &Funding Gaps Pose Risk
Source: Factset, Vertical Research Partners
Land Rig Breakdown – Leverage to Small Private Cos.
Source: Land Rig Newsletter, Vertical Research Partners
Funding gaps & smaller operators present a risk. Small private companies pose a risk to North American activity if financing becomes more difficult. Funding gaps for smaller public E&P’s likely reflect similar capital needs for smaller private operators. Given that these private operators comprise 36% of the US rig fleet, we see a significant risk from tighter capital markets in the wake of European debt issues. If the Majors and NOC’s decelerate their JV activity and acquisitions amid internal capital budgeting debates, we see a risk to activity from smaller players with limited financing options or the incentive from an end market to sell de-risked reserves, which they are not capitalized to develop.
Flattening North American Rig Count Estimates. To incorporate potential headwinds we are cutting our previous estimate for 18% US rig count growth for 2012 to 9%. Our forecast assumes operators continue to drill to maintain leases and replace reserves, but assumes that growth from well-funded operators is offset by a slowdown in activity from smaller players. Since commodity prices and capital markets have not deteriorated to the same degree as 2008/2009, we do not see a need to be more punitive, but acknowledge the potential downside risk if the economic outlook worsens.
North American Rig Count Revisions
Source: Baker Hughes, Vertical Research Partners
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2,200
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Jan-
08M
ar-0
8M
ay-0
8Ju
l-08
Sep-
08N
ov-0
8Ja
n-09
Mar
-09
May
-09
Jul-0
9Se
p-09
Nov
-09
Jan-
10M
ar-1
0M
ay-1
0Ju
l-10
Sep-
10N
ov-1
0Ja
n-11
Mar
-11
May
-11
Jul-1
1Se
p-11
US
Land
RIg
Cou
nt
3Mo.
Inte
r-ba
nk le
ndin
g Sp
read
s vs
. R
isk
Free
(bps
)
3Mo. Euribor / 3Mo. German Bund Spread
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
- 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000
CFO
/CAP
EX
Mkt. Cap. ($mm)
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
CFO
/CAP
EX
% Debt to EV
~17% of companies carryhigher leverage and funding
Large Cap32%
Majors11%
Super Indep.8%
Sm./Mid. Caps.12%
Utilities1%
Private Companies
36%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011E 2012E 2013E 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11E 4Q11E 1Q12E 2Q12E 3Q12E 4Q12EGas Rigs 1,466 1,491 802 942 893 911 931 900 880 894 899 904 909 914 919
Previous 889 903 957 890 895 900 906 911 Oil Rigs 297 379 276 585 969 1,117 1,331 808 938 1,043 1,088 1,098 1,108 1,118 1,143
Previous 976 1,290 1,458 1,128 1,193 1,258 1,322 1,387 Misc. 5 12 21 11 8 11 12 9 8 7 8 9 10 11 12
United States 1,768 1,882 1,100 1,539 1,871 2,039 2,274 1,716 1,826 1,944 1,995 2,011 2,027 2,043 2,074 Previous 1,875 2,206 2,430 2,028 2,099 2,170 2,242 2,313
Canada 343 382 221 349 428 438 458 587 182 441 504 597 192 451 514 Previous 433 458 467 504 616 211 471 534
North America 2,110 2,263 1,321 1,888 2,299 2,477 2,733 2,303 2,008 2,385 2,499 2,608 2,219 2,494 2,588 Previous 2,308 2,664 2,898 2,532 2,585 2,638 2,690 2,743
Years Quarters
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
4
Negative Implications for North American Pressure Pumping Pressure Pumping Linked to Horizontal Rig Count
Source: Baker Hughes, Vertical Research Partners Pressure Pumping Revenue/Rig
Source: Spears, Company Filings & Presentations, Vertical Research Partners Supply Demand Balance Approaching
Source: Company Filings & Presentations, Vertical Research Partners
Shift to Horizontal Rig Count Maturing
Source: Baker Hughes, Vertical Research Partners Pressure pumping earnings see risk of slower rig count growth. Growth in unconventional plays, horizontal drilling, and the pressure pumping market progressed in concert over the last few years. In our view, shift in the demand curve for pressure pumping horsepower is close to maturity, with the horizontal rig count accounting for 60% of the US land rig count and growth in service intensity per well digested. As the upward shift in pressure pumping horsepower demand absorbed the spare capacity, a resultant shortage of equipment led to pricing power, economic rents, and immense horsepower construction program. We see net capacity in the market doubling between 4Q10 and 4Q12 by our estimation. Given lower barriers to entry and the emergence of new pressure pumping IPO’s like C&J and others in the pipeline, our estimates of capacity additions have a greater upside than downside risk. From our conversations with oil services companies, at the beginning of 2011, North American demand for pressure pumping horsepower was around 12m horsepower and the supply of horsepower was closer to 10m horsepower. Our analysis of horsepower supply suggests the market had 10mm horsepower in 1Q11. The estimate of 12m horsepower of demand equates to a little over 7,000 horsepower per US rig in 1Q11. Based on announced building programs and assumption that all operators will look to maintain market share, the market will reach over 17m of horsepower supplied by the end of 2012. If horsepower demand per rig grows modestly through 2012, the supply of horsepower per rig will reach equilibrium in the middle of 2012, if the US rig count growth slows in line with our forecast. As supply outstrips demand into the second half of the year, we forecast competition from incoming pressure pumping capacity will erode pricing power gained since 2009.
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
$-
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Rig
Cou
nt
Pres
sure
Pum
ping
Mar
ket (
$mm
)
Total Pressure Pumping Market US Horizontal Rig Count
$7 $7 $7 $8 $8 $8
$9 $11
$11 $13
$15 $17
$22
$- $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9
$10 $11 $12 $13 $14 $15 $16 $17 $18 $19 $20 $21 $22 $23
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Rev
enue
per
irg
($00
0)
Pressure Pumping Rev. / US Rig
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
8,000
8,500
9,000
3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12
Hor
sepo
wer
per
rig
Pressure Pumping HP / US Rig Estimated HP Demand / US Rig
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Jan-93
Jan-94
Jan-95
Jan-96
Jan-97
Jan-98
Jan-99
Jan-00
Jan-01
Jan-02
Jan-03
Jan-04
Jan-05
Jan-06
Jan-07
Jan-08
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
Shar
e of
US
Land
RIg
Cou
nt
Horizontal Directional Vertical
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
5
De-risking estimates for North American Pressure Pumping Mkt. Share
Source: Spears, Vertical Research Partners Oil Services North American Exposure
Source: Spears, Company Data, Vertical Research Partners US Land vs. International Rig Counts
Source: Baker Hughes, Vertical Research Partners
Lowering our estimates for North America. The collapse of oil service shares due to fear of European debt issues make a bearish call on pressure pumping less heroic, but it allows us to calibrate our estimates and view. From conversations with industry players, we surmise 20% of the increase in pressure pumping revenue between 2009 and 2011 has come from pricing power. In our view, the market will surrender pricing premiums if supply balances demand. We see little support for pricing in long term contracts, which may support utilization for the larger players in the space, but are not structured around fixed pricing. Since we believe that North American rig count growth will accelerate once near term macroeconomic and capital market issues pass, we are not making the assumption that a an oversupply of horsepower yields a crash in North American pressure pumping or North American geographic margins. That said, we are tempering our margin expectations across 2012 to remove recent pricing gains. We see the impetus to spend the remainder of 2011 budgets as supportive of activity through the end of the year, but a deceleration of activity with the arrival of 2012 budgets. Following the lull, we see a recovery of the North American rig count into 2013, under the assumption that current economic and capital market headwinds fade. Please find the details of these assumption changes to our earnings estimates across our coverage on the next page. International outlook remains largely unchanged awaiting further data points. During the 2008/2009 downturn international rig counts fell by 13%, versus ~50% in North America. The magnitude of the negative impact from Europe remains unknown, but the shock to financial markets and degree of the slowdown does not appear as profound as 2008/2009. Capital markets have tightened, but we see this as a bigger problem for smaller, higher risk North American E&P companies than larger international IOCs and NOCs. The exception to the rule may be the emerging class of E&P companies with operations in the UK North Sea and other emerging global basins. That said, cash flow from Brent prices above $100/bbl, the impetus for OPEC to expand spare capacity to maintain order in the oil market, the awaking of upstream spending from NOCs, and strong international offshore rig tendering activity as supportive of the positive trajectory of international activity in our forecast.
HAL28%
SLB21%BHI
16%
Frac Tech5%
TCW4%
WFT4%
CFW3%
NBR3%
Cudd3%
PTEN2%
Others (10+ companies)
11%
100%
90%
70%
58% 55%50%
44%
30%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
PTEN KEG NBR HAL CAM BHI WFT SLB
% R
even
ue fr
om N
orth
Am
eric
a
800
850
900
950
1000
1050
1100
1150
1200
1250
1300
800900
1,0001,1001,2001,3001,4001,5001,6001,7001,8001,9002,0002,100
Jan-
08Fe
b-08
Mar
-08
Apr
-08
May
-08
Jun-
08Ju
l-08
Aug
-08
Sep-
08O
ct-0
8N
ov-0
8D
ec-0
8Ja
n-09
Feb-
09M
ar-0
9A
pr-0
9M
ay-0
9Ju
n-09
Jul-0
9A
ug-0
9Se
p-09
Oct
-09
Nov
-09
Dec
-09
Jan-
10Fe
b-10
Mar
-10
Apr
-10
May
-10
Jun-
10Ju
l-10
Aug
-10
Sep-
10O
ct-1
0N
ov-1
0D
ec-1
0Ja
n-11
Feb-
11M
ar-1
1A
pr-1
1M
ay-1
1Ju
n-11
Jul-1
1A
ug-1
1Se
p-11
Inte
rnat
iona
l Rig
Cou
nt
US
Rig
Cou
nt
US Total International Rig Count
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
6
Earnings Revisions Summary
Company Category 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 2011 2012Schlumberger EPS 4.46 2.74 2.85 3.75 5.42 0.71 0.87 1.02 1.16 1.25 1.27 1.40 1.51 -1% 2%
Previous EPS 3.80 6.54 1.02 1.21 1.41 1.50 1.75 1.91 Consensus EPS 3.80 5.34 1.03 1.21 1.19 1.28 1.42 1.57
Consensus EPS-High 4.05 5.90 1.12 1.37 1.29 1.37 1.54 1.77 Consensus EPS-Low 3.68 3.85 0.98 1.12 1.10 1.21 1.32 1.42
Halliburton EPS 2.90 1.34 2.08 3.42 3.94 0.65 0.81 0.94 1.02 1.06 0.93 0.98 0.97 2% -12%Previous EPS 3.47 5.00 0.65 0.81 0.95 1.05 1.18 1.11 1.31 1.41
Consensus EPS 3.36 4.45 0.91 1.03 1.05 1.10 1.17 1.23 Consensus EPS-High 3.50 5.40 0.96 1.12 1.19 1.28 1.41 1.51 Consensus EPS-Low 2.97 3.30 0.63 0.91 0.97 0.96 0.92 1.00
Baker Hughes EPS 5.36 1.91 2.28 4.33 5.42 0.87 0.93 1.19 1.33 1.39 1.28 1.37 1.39 -1% -7%Previous EPS 4.38 6.65 0.87 0.93 1.21 1.37 1.53 1.40 1.78 1.94
Consensus EPS 4.38 5.85 1.21 1.37 1.38 1.37 1.58 1.73 Consensus EPS-High 4.54 6.90 1.28 1.50 1.48 1.50 1.85 2.07 Consensus EPS-Low 4.14 4.74 1.11 1.17 1.21 1.20 1.37 1.43
Weatherford EPS 2.00 0.36 0.49 0.82 1.40 0.10 0.17 0.25 0.29 0.33 0.31 0.37 0.40 -7% -13%Previous EPS 0.88 2.10 0.10 0.17 0.26 0.36 0.44 0.47 0.57 0.62
Consensus EPS 0.88 1.62 0.26 0.34 0.37 0.37 0.46 0.51 Consensus EPS-High 0.98 1.96 0.30 0.40 0.43 0.42 0.54 0.60 Consensus EPS-Low 0.80 1.04 0.25 0.19 0.32 0.30 0.39 0.48
Key Energy Services EPS 1.29 (0.46) (0.17) 1.00 1.67 0.09 0.23 0.30 0.38 0.40 0.42 0.42 0.43 2% -5%Previous EPS 1.00 1.83 0.09 0.23 0.30 0.38 0.40 0.44 0.48 0.51
Consensus EPS 0.98 1.75 0.31 0.35 0.37 0.43 0.47 0.45 Consensus EPS-High 1.07 1.98 0.34 0.44 0.44 0.49 0.54 0.52 Consensus EPS-Low 0.90 1.33 0.27 0.28 0.30 0.34 0.37 0.32
National Oilwell Varco EPS 5.13 3.94 4.08 4.48 5.26 1.00 1.14 1.16 1.19 1.24 1.30 1.34 1.38 -1% -8%Previous EPS 4.50 5.76 1.00 1.14 1.17 1.20 1.28 1.38 1.51 1.59
Consensus EPS 4.51 5.72 1.17 1.20 1.30 1.36 1.48 1.60 Consensus EPS-High 4.66 6.30 1.25 1.34 1.43 1.47 1.63 1.77 Consensus EPS-Low 4.35 5.20 1.09 1.08 1.23 1.22 1.37 1.44
Cameron International EPS 2.64 2.35 2.41 2.66 3.79 0.49 0.66 0.71 0.80 0.90 0.93 0.96 1.00 -1% 1%Previous EPS 2.66 3.91 0.49 0.66 0.71 0.80 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.06
Consensus EPS 2.69 3.76 0.74 0.81 0.83 0.90 0.97 1.05 Consensus EPS-High 2.86 4.10 0.78 0.92 0.94 1.01 1.06 1.19 Consensus EPS-Low 2.60 3.50 0.71 0.74 0.68 0.80 0.86 0.94
FMC Technologies EPS 2.94 2.93 3.06 1.70 2.37 0.32 0.39 0.48 0.52 0.55 0.58 0.61 0.63 -1% 4%Consensus EPS 1.71 2.28 0.46 0.54 0.52 0.56 0.59 0.63
Consensus EPS-High 1.80 2.45 0.50 0.60 0.57 0.61 0.64 0.68 Consensus EPS-Low 1.64 2.10 0.41 0.50 0.47 0.53 0.55 0.55
Dril-Quip EPS 2.62 2.75 2.80 2.32 3.90 0.54 0.55 0.58 0.65 0.74 0.90 1.06 1.19 0% 13%Consensus EPS 2.33 3.45 0.58 0.65 0.74 0.82 0.88 0.95
Consensus EPS-High 2.39 4.00 0.67 0.73 0.86 0.93 1.07 1.14 Consensus EPS-Low 2.28 3.05 0.57 0.60 0.68 0.75 0.77 0.83
Transocean EPS 14.40 11.44 6.08 3.24 7.00 0.48 0.65 0.81 1.29 1.39 1.69 1.95 1.97 -4% 20%Consensus EPS 3.36 5.84 0.80 1.33 1.30 1.53 1.52 1.48
Consensus EPS-High 4.82 6.90 1.03 1.60 1.75 1.71 1.77 1.65 Consensus EPS-Low 2.45 4.52 0.55 1.00 1.08 1.35 1.22 1.23
Seadrill EPS 1.05 2.60 2.64 2.63 3.24 0.72 0.41 0.70 0.76 0.73 0.86 0.84 0.81 -8% 2%Previous EPS 2.63 3.36 0.70 0.76 0.85 0.86 0.84 0.81
Consensus EPS 2.85 3.19 0.73 0.77 0.77 0.79 0.80 0.77 Consensus EPS-High 3.33 3.69 0.89 0.87 0.86 0.88 0.89 0.87 Consensus EPS-Low 2.55 2.70 0.62 0.70 0.71 0.74 0.74 0.70
Noble EPS 5.69 6.44 3.09 1.68 4.52 0.16 0.17 0.53 0.82 1.02 1.03 1.18 1.29 0% 15%Previous EPS 1.68 4.52 0.59 0.76 1.03 1.03 1.17 1.29
Consensus EPS 1.67 3.94 0.57 0.76 0.92 0.96 1.01 1.07 Consensus EPS-High 2.00 5.22 0.75 0.92 1.11 1.10 1.13 1.23 Consensus EPS-Low 1.40 3.20 0.44 0.62 0.74 0.74 0.82 0.90
Diamond Offshore EPS 9.96 9.82 6.69 6.29 6.05 1.80 1.92 1.39 1.19 1.09 1.60 1.58 1.78 2% 21%Consensus EPS 6.18 4.99 1.47 1.09 1.15 1.26 1.23 1.29
Consensus EPS-High 6.64 6.14 1.64 1.48 1.46 1.51 1.62 1.57 Consensus EPS-Low 4.44 3.75 1.21 0.87 0.76 0.86 0.93 0.99
Ensco EPS 8.21 5.50 3.80 3.04 5.75 0.46 0.72 0.85 1.17 1.34 1.58 1.67 1.79 -13% -2%Consensus EPS 3.49 5.86 0.87 1.32 1.34 1.42 1.46 1.62
Consensus EPS-High 3.95 6.50 1.07 1.50 1.50 1.52 1.61 1.84 Consensus EPS-Low 3.10 5.35 0.72 1.02 1.10 1.28 1.34 1.41
Rowan EPS 4.06 2.98 2.61 1.80 4.37 0.24 0.38 0.43 0.76 0.92 0.98 1.23 1.24 6% 15%Consensus EPS 1.69 3.79 0.40 0.69 0.87 0.91 0.94 0.95
Consensus EPS-High 2.10 4.40 0.52 0.90 1.14 1.13 1.06 1.25 Consensus EPS-Low 1.25 3.20 0.33 0.50 0.63 0.61 0.65 0.70
Atwood Oceanics EPS 3.25 3.77 4.04 4.02 4.35 1.08 1.15 0.98 0.97 1.02 1.16 1.21 1.48 0% 5%Previous EPS 4.02 4.44 1.08 1.15 0.98 0.97 1.02 1.16 1.29 1.57
Consensus EPS 4.03 4.14 1.02 1.07 0.92 1.04 1.17 1.16 Consensus EPS-High 4.40 4.50 1.25 1.17 1.06 1.44 1.36 1.31 Consensus EPS-Low 3.66 3.69 0.93 0.77 0.80 0.91 0.88 1.06
Hercules Offshore EPS 1.07 (0.68) (0.54) (0.51) (0.15) (0.12) (0.10) (0.11) (0.17) (0.08) (0.03) (0.02) (0.01) na naConsensus EPS (0.56) (0.42) (0.14) (0.19) (0.14) (0.09) (0.09) (0.08)
Consensus EPS-High (0.38) 0.20 (0.06) (0.07) - 0.05 0.07 0.08 Consensus EPS-Low (0.67) (0.74) (0.20) (0.25) (0.24) (0.17) (0.19) (0.19)
Nabors Industries EPS 3.12 1.32 1.18 1.54 2.63 0.29 0.23 0.40 0.61 0.67 0.65 0.66 0.65 5% 8%Previous EPS 1.55 3.00 0.29 0.23 0.41 0.62 0.70 0.73 0.77 0.80
Consensus EPS 1.47 2.45 0.40 0.54 0.60 0.55 0.64 0.69 Consensus EPS-High 1.55 2.90 0.45 0.62 0.69 0.68 0.74 0.79 Consensus EPS-Low 1.37 2.00 0.36 0.48 0.53 0.45 0.52 0.60
Patterson-UTI Energy EPS 2.35 (0.19) 0.69 2.28 2.66 0.46 0.52 0.59 0.71 0.77 0.72 0.63 0.54 -2% -14%Previous EPS 2.28 3.15 0.46 0.52 0.59 0.71 0.76 0.78 0.80 0.81
Consensus EPS 2.32 3.08 0.63 0.70 0.73 0.75 0.83 0.87 Consensus EPS-High 2.39 3.62 0.66 0.75 0.81 0.83 0.96 1.01 Consensus EPS-Low 2.20 2.10 0.59 0.62 0.65 0.65 0.67 0.67
VRP EPS vs Consensus
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
7
Discounting lower growth and more risk in price targets Revised Price Valuation Ranges and Price Targets
Source: Vertical Research Partners
Change in Price Targets
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners Relative share performance since 7/22/11
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Lowering Price Targets for Oil Services Shares. In conjunction with lowering earnings estimates, we imply lower growth in our earnings multiple valuation framework. At the same time, we are transitioning the betas incorporated in our valuation analysis from the five year implied beta to the two year implied beta. The original impetus to use a longer horizon on our beta calculation looked to smooth out some of above average volatility in recent years and reduce the larger differences in implied risk between companies. Given the risk of near term earnings volatility due to economic issues overhanging the sector, we opted to migrate to a two year beta, which better reflects near term uncertainty, potential further downside risks to earnings estimates depending on macroeconomic outcomes, and the probability of greater volatility across oil service shares. As a result, discount rates used in calculating our target multiples have increased, our valuation multiples have come down, and our prices targets are lower. Our new valuation ranges and price targets are illustrated on this page and the methodology is further outlined on pg. 33. We remain bullish on international levered names at current share levels, but anticipate further volatility as unpredictable political and economic forces unfold. We continue to favor companies with leverage to international and offshore activity, with less exposure to funding issues with smaller operators, and better supported by higher Brent prices, positive indications from offshore tendering activity, and demand on OPEC spare capacity. Within this framework, SLB (Buy, PT$110) and BHI (Buy, PT$95) remain our top large cap. picks. DRQ (Buy, PT$90) and NBR (Buy, PT$29) remain our top small.mid cap. picks. We continue to favor RIG (Buy, PT$98), SDRL (Buy, PT$49), and DO (Buy, PT$100) among offshore drillers. North American levered shares should remain volatile. Given the greater exposure to North America, KEG, NBR, PTEN, and HAL experienced the biggest drop in share price since the end of July. We anticipate that these shares will remain volatile, especially those with pressure pumping exposure. Although we are lowering our North America estimates, especially as it related to pressure pumping, current depressed levels in these shares leave us looking for value rather than contemplating downgrades. In the event of progress on the European debt and macro front, we anticipate that these North American names will lead a resultant rally in the sector. Therefore, we see attractive trades brewing for HAL and NBR as the “macro fear” trade abates.
$29 $27
$95
$60
$110
$16
$28
$90
$60 $65
$80
$13 $13
$49
$33
$63
$10 $17
$54
$40 $45
$59
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
NBR WFT BHI HAL SLB KEG PTEN DRQ FTI CAM NOV
Implied P/E Valuation Range Price Target Current Px
Current Price
Return to Price
Target
Current Price
Targets
Previous Price
TargetsNBR 14$ 113% 29$ 37$ WFT 13$ 104% 27$ 32$ BHI 50$ 90% 95$ 125$ HAL 34$ 77% 60$ 90$ SLB 63$ 73% 110$ 150$ DRQ 55$ 64% 90$ 95$ PTEN 17$ 63% 28$ 37$ KEG 10$ 60% 16$ 22$ FTI 41$ 47% 60$ 65$ CAM 46$ 41% 65$ 71$ NOV 60$ 34% 80$ 90$
-12%-13%
-19%-20%
-21%-22%-23%
-26%-27%
-28%-28%
-32%-33%
-37%-41%
-42%-49%
-51%-51%
-60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0%FMC Technologies
Cameron InternationalSeadrillRowan
Diamond OffshoreNoble
ENSCODril-Quip
Atwood OceanicsTransocean
National Oilwell VarcoSchlumberger
WeatherfordBaker Hughes
HalliburtonHercules Offshore
Patterson-UTI EnergyNabors Industries
Key Energy Services
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
8
Coverage Synopsis
Note Shaded depicts Top Picks
Target Exp.Mkt. Cap. P/E P/E
Company Ticker Rating Price Price Return ($Bn) 2011 2012 2011 2012 Key ThemesBaker Hughes BHI Buy $49 $95 93% $21.5 11.4X 9.1X -1% -7% A laggard during the last cycle, BHI has polished its operating structure. We forecast a reversion to
peer growth and margins, especially in international markets. Near term headwinds from North America and pressure pumping exposure should be largely discounted into shares at these levels.
Schlumberger SLB Buy $63 $110 76% $84.5 16.7X 11.6X -1% 2% Leverage to international, offshore and NOC spending. A technology leader, whose higher value-added services should drive margins, will benefit from an expansion in exploration activity. SLB carries the least exposure to the North American market amongst diversifies oil service companies.Meanwhile, SLB's superior international footprint provides investors excellent leverage to ramp in international activity that will follow as the commodity market tiightens and internation upstream investments accelerates to keep pace with oil and natural gas demand.
Weatherford WFT Buy $13 $27 106% $9.8 16.1X 9.3X -7% -13% As a victim of operating leverage in the downturn leverage during the last downturn, WFT has felt the brunt of the latest dowturn in the market. These same forces will benefit WFT as international upstream spending activity emerges, especially from NOCs, who tend to spend at a lag to other players in the market.
FMC Technologies FTI Buy $40 $60 50% $9.6 23.6X 16.9X -1% 4% Favorable leverage to the offshore market with its subsea business and pressure pumping expansion through its flowline business, with a discounted earnings multiple offers an attractive entry point. We favor FTI's improving fundamentals, grwoth trajectory, and potential earnings visibility.
Cameron International CAM Buy $45 $65 43% $11.1 17.1X 12.0X -1% 1% Investors underestimate the company's leverage to the surface and subsea production equipment and international markets. Given the stock dramatically lagged its peers and screens well on valuation, we see a favorable risk reward amidst low expectations.
Halliburton HAL Buy $33 $60 80% $30.6 9.7X 8.5X 2% -12% Leverage to surging North American and pressure pumping economics may continue to weigh on shares. Given aggressive international growth and margin targets, we see upside once investor's attention turns to international and offshore opportunities.
National Oilwell Varco NOV Hold $59 $80 36% $24.9 13.1X 11.2X -1% -8% As the largest rig equipment provider, NOV rallied strongly with a renewal of land and offshore rig constructions. We forecast strong orders for rig and other oil services equipment, but believe that the shares may reflect those expectations as well. We are biased toward upside in our forecast, but await a better entry point. That said, with a resumption of the rally in oil services shares a trade into the $80's remains a reasonable expectation.
Dril-Quip DRQ Buy $54 $90 65% $2.2 23.5X 13.9X 0% 13% Strong exposure to offshore spending cycle, spare production capacity to capture rising order volumes, trading at a discount to recent market volatility and investor questions about the future of management, after the recent unfortunate passing of two founders. We believe that low expectations for DRQ will turn with the ramping in global offshore activity, especially in the Gulf of Mexico and Brazil. Given visibility for earnings growth and depressed valuation, we are buyers of DRQ shares.
Nabors Industries NBR Buy $13 $29 116% $3.9 8.7X 5.1X 5% 8% Missed earnings expectations and attention to upstream investments will yield attention to stronger international operations, US land drilling, and recovery of smaller business in the portfolio. Screening well on valuation and a laggard of the recent rally in oil services stocks, we like the risk/reward in NBR shares.
Patterson-UTI Energy PTEN Hold $17 $28 65% $2.6 7.4X 6.4X -2% -14% Strong leverage to the North American land drilling and pressure pumping market may contineu to overhang the shares. PTEN must continue to reinvest in new land rigs backed with contracts and maintain utilization for lower-spec. legacy rigs for positive share momentum to return.
Key Energy Services KEG Hold $10 $16 64% $1.5 9.7X 5.8X 2% -5% Well servicing, coiled tubing, and fluids management look set to drive positive economics from the rise of unconventional plays is North American and International markets. As estimates capture the positive outlook and risks are emerging for North American growth and increased equipment supply, we have become more guarded in our optimism.
Target Exp.Mkt. Cap. P/NAV P/NAV
Company Ticker Rating Price Price Return ($Bn) 2011 2012 2011 2012 Key ThemeTransocean RIG Buy $46 $98 111% $14.9 62% 59% -4% 20% Rig availability across deepwater floaters, midwater floaters, and jackups leaves room to capture
upside above our estimates. Ultimately, we see upside from the transition to a fuller payout model, which should re-rate shares on a yield basis from a discount to NAV to a premium to NAV.
Seadrill SDRL Buy $29 $49 69% $13.6 161% 150% -8% 2% Contract rollover and uncontracted deepwater newbuilds should benefit this shrewd and aggressive contractor. Rising cash flows should drive higher distributions, which should press the shares price higher relative to its yield-based valuation.
Diamond Offshore DO Buy $56 $100 79% $7.8 59% 58% 2% 21% Deepwater and midwater floater availability will allow DO to capture rising dayrates. In combination with cash flows from newbuilds, rising dividend distributions over the course of the cycle, may rerate the shares from a P/NAV discount to a premium on a yield basis. Current fleet age and quality questions will fade as rising demand with the upstream cycle brings rigs back to work.
Hercules Offshore HERO Buy $3 $10 261% $0.4 62% 55% -9% -65% Shares reflect poor sentiment for commodity jackups and few prospects for the shallow water Gulf of Mexico (GoM). A return of permitting and moderate recovery in shallow water jackup demand, given limited jackup supply in the GoM, will help utilization, dayrates, commodity rig values, and HERO shares.
Rowan RDC Buy $31 $52 68% $4.0 63% 57% 6% 15% We like RDC shares at a discount to NAV, with the prospects of open premium jackup capacity in a tightening high-spec. jackup market, and non-core business divestitures freed to reinvest into an expansion into the deepwater rig market.
Atwood Oceanics ATW Hold $36 $52 46% $2.3 78% 70% 0% 5% Solid operator, with an impetus to maintain leverage to the business through fleet expansion, and upside from rising rig values, but seeking a better entry point.
Noble NE Hold $30 $47 59% $7.5 83% 78% 0% 15% Good exposure to the contract drilling business and leverage to growth through an extensive newbuild program, which appears to have corrected recent issues with rigs under construction, but trading at NAV leaving less upside relative to other offshore drillers.
ENSCO ESV Hold $41 $63 53% $9.5 #REF! #REF! -13% -2% Quality jackup fleet will capture the rising tide in rates and the potential to unlock value in PDE assets through future contracting paint a positive picture that largely captured at the current P/NAV. A potential upside catalyst may come with the expansion of their dividend payout strategy.
Offs
hore
Con
trac
t Dril
lers
Smal
l/Mid
. Cap
. Oil
Serv
, & E
quip
.
VRP EPS vs. Consensus
VRP EPS vs. Consensus
Larg
e C
ap. O
il Se
rvic
es &
Equ
ipm
ent
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
9
Global Rig Counts
International Oil/Gas Breakdown Source: Baker Hughes
Oil Gas M/M MixSep-11 Aug-11 M/M Y/Y YTD % Peak Sep-11 Aug-11 M/M Y/Y YTD % Peak Oil Gas Oil Gas
Europe 63 67 -6.0% 5.0% -8.7% 83% 39 43 -9.3% 62.5% 62.5% 91% (4) (4) 62% 38%Middle East 221 209 5.7% 16.3% 21.4% 100% 71 78 -9.0% -17.4% -16.5% 76% 12 (7) 76% 24%Africa 63 60 5.0% -16.0% 0.0% 84% 11 10 10.0% 22.2% -15.4% 55% 3 1 85% 15%Latin America 376 384 -2.1% 19.0% 14.3% 96% 49 53 -7.5% -18.3% -2.0% 56% (8) (4) 88% 12%Asia/Pacific 182 183 -0.5% -12.9% -12.9% 86% 55 53 3.8% -1.8% 1.9% 79% (1) 2 77% 23%World, ex North America 905 903 0.2% 6.5% 6.2% 99% 225 237 -5.1% -4.3% -0.4% 90% 2 (12) 80.1% 19.9%
Total Oil & Gas 1,130 1,140 -0.9% 4.1% 4.8%Misc 78 84 Total World Rig Count, ex NA, CIS 1,208 1,224 -1.3% 4.1% 4.0% 98.1%
International Land/Offshore Breakdown Source: Baker Hughes
Land Offshore M/M MixSep-11 Aug-11 M/M Y/Y YTD % Peak Sep-11 Aug-11 M/M Y/Y YTD % Peak Land OS Land OS
Europe 74 74 0.0% 60.9% 32.1% 100% 46 54 -15% -4% -6% 65% - (8) 62% 38%Middle East 255 250 2.0% 5.8% 8.1% 99% 37 37 0% 6% 19% 86% 5 - 87% 13%Africa 52 48 8.3% -11.9% -1.9% 79% 26 27 -4% -10% 0% 90% 4 (1) 67% 33%Latin America 341 345 -1.2% 11.8% 8.9% 97% 91 96 -5% 20% 26% 95% (4) (5) 79% 21%Asia/Pacific 148 148 0.0% -2.6% -5.7% 93% 104 104 0% -19% -17% 79% - - 59% 41%World, ex North America 870 865 0.6% 8.3% 6.7% 99% 338 359 -5.8% -5.3% -2.6% 92% 5 (14) 72.0% 28.0%
Total Land 870 865 0.6% 8.3% 6.7% 99%Total Offshore 338 359 -5.8% -5.3% -2.6% 92%Total World Rig Count, ex NA, CIS 1,208 1,224 -1.3% 4.1% 4.0% 98.1%
North America Rig Summary Source: Baker Hughes
Latest Share W/W M/M Y/Y YTD W/W M/M Y/Y YTD % Peak % Trough Week Month Year Yr. End Peak TroughLand 1,961 98% 17 54 327 305 1% 3% 20% 18% 100% 320% 1,944 1,907 1,634 1,656 1,961 613 Inland 17 1% 2 (2) - 3 13% -11% 0% 21% 55% 425% 15 19 17 14 31 4 Offshore 33 2% 2 3 13 9 6% 10% 65% 38% 18% 110% 31 30 20 24 181 30
US Total 2,011 21 55 340 317 1% 3% 20% 19% 93% 311% 1,990 1,956 1,671 1,694 2,173 647C. Oil 356 68% 5 - 118 238 1% 0% 50% 202% 78% 2373% 351 356 238 118 454 15 C. Gas 166 32% 7 7 1 38 4% 4% 1% 30% 28% 426% 159 159 165 128 596 39 C. Misc. - 0% - - - - 0% - - - - 4 -
Canada 522 12 7 119 276 2% 1% 30% 112% 50% 967% 510 515 403 246 1,054 54 NA Total 2,533 33 62 459 593 1% 3% 22% 31% 78% 361% 2,500 2,471 2,074 1,940 3,227 701
GOM 33 3 3 13 9 10% 10% 65% 38% 19% 114% 30 30 20 24 176 29
US Oil 1,070 53% 10 13 380 305 1% 1% 55% 40% 100% 930% 1,060 1,057 690 765 1,071 115 US Gas 935 46% 12 43 (36) 16 1% 5% -4% 2% 58% 158% 923 892 971 919 1,606 591 Misc. 6 0% (1) (1) (4) (4) -14% -14% -40% -40% 9% 7 7 10 10 64 -
US Dir. 246 12% 8 11 33 34 3% 5% 15% 16% 59% 154% 238 235 213 212 416 160 US Hor. 1,148 57% 13 14 219 201 1% 1% 24% 21% 100% 2208% 1,135 1,134 929 947 1,148 52 US Vert. 617 31% - 30 88 82 0% 5% 17% 15% 58% 186% 617 587 529 535 1,064 331
Change in Rigs % Change in Rigs Historical Rig Count
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
10
Charting Global Rig Counts International Land & Offshore Rig Counts
Source: Baker Hughes, Vertical Research Partners
Global Land Rig Count, ex CIS
Source: Baker Hughes, Vertical Research Partners
Rig Count Growth YTD
Source: Baker Hughes, Vertical Research Partners
International Oil & Gas Rigs
Source: Baker Hughes, Vertical Research Partners
Global Offshore Rig Count, ex CIS
Source: Baker Hughes, Vertical Research Partners
Rig Count Growth Y/Y
Source: Baker Hughes, Vertical Research Partners
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Jan-82Jan-83Jan-84Jan-85Jan-86Jan-87Jan-88Jan-89Jan-90Jan-91Jan-92Jan-93Jan-94Jan-95Jan-96Jan-97Jan-98Jan-99Jan-00Jan-01Jan-02Jan-03Jan-04Jan-05Jan-06Jan-07Jan-08Jan-09Jan-10Jan-11
Offs
hore
Rig
Cou
nts
Land
Rig
Cou
nts
International Land International Offshore
Europe3% Middle East
9%Africa
2%
Latin America12%
Asia Pacific5%
North America
69%
18.7%
14.3%12.2%
9.4%
-1.3%
-10.6%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
US Total Europe Latin America Middle East Africa Asia Pacific
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Jan-95
Jan-96
Jan-97
Jan-98
Jan-99
Jan-00
Jan-01
Jan-02
Jan-03
Jan-04
Jan-05
Jan-06
Jan-07
Jan-08
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
Gas
Rig
s
Oil
Rig
s
Oil Rigs Gas Rigs
Europe13%
Middle East11%
Africa8%
Latin America27%
Asia Pacific31%
North America
10%
27.7%
20.3%
13.4%
5.8%
-10.3% -11.4%-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
Europe US Total Latin America Middle East Asia Pacific Africa
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
11
Global Rig Count & Global Oil Production
Source: Baker Hughes, IEA
2011 Rig Forecast/IEA Prod. Est.
Latest
2012 Rig Forecast/ IEA Prod. Est.R² = 0.82
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
1,300
70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92
Rig
Cou
nts,
ex.
Nor
th A
mer
ica
& C
IS
Oil Production (mbd)
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
12
Global Rig Count Forecast
International Drilling Intensity Increasing
Source: Baker Hughes, Vertical Research Partners
Tracking Our 2011 Rig Count Forecast
Source: Baker Hughes, Vertical Research Partners
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011E 2012E 2013E 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11E 4Q11E 1Q12E 2Q12E 3Q12E 4Q12E
Gas Rigs 1,466 1,491 802 942 893 911 931 900 880 894 899 904 909 914 919 %Y/Y 6.8% 1.7% -46.2% 17.4% -5.2% 2.0% 2.2% 2.0% -8.1% -8.5% -5.6% 0.4% 3.2% 2.2% 2.2%
Oil Rigs 297 379 276 585 969 1,117 1,331 808 938 1,043 1,088 1,098 1,108 1,118 1,143 %Y/Y 8.7% 27.5% -27.2% 112.2% 65.6% 15.2% 19.1% 79.5% 74.9% 65.5% 50.1% 35.9% 18.2% 7.2% 5.1%
United States 1,768 1,882 1,100 1,539 1,871 2,039 2,274 1,716 1,826 1,944 1,995 2,011 2,027 2,043 2,074 %Y/Y 7.2% 6.4% -41.5% 39.9% 21.5% 9.0% 11.5% 27.6% 21.3% 20.2% 18.2% 17.2% 11.0% 5.1% 4.0%
Canada 343 382 221 349 428 438 458 587 182 441 504 597 192 451 514 %Y/Y -27.3% 11.4% -42.0% 57.7% 22.8% 2.3% 4.6% 25.2% 11.6% 22.4% 24.7% 1.7% 5.5% 2.3% 2.0%
North America 2,110 2,263 1,321 1,888 2,299 2,477 2,733 2,303 2,008 2,385 2,499 2,608 2,219 2,494 2,588 %Y/Y -0.5% 7.2% -41.6% 42.9% 21.8% 7.8% 10.3% 27.0% 20.4% 20.6% 19.5% 13.2% 10.5% 4.6% 3.6%
EuropeTotal 78 98 84 94 120 140 160 118 112 123 128 133 138 143 148
%Y/Y 0.5% 26.0% -14.9% 12.4% 27.8% 16.9% 14.3% 34.2% 16.3% 33.8% 27.7% 12.7% 23.3% 16.3% 15.7%Middle East
Total 265 280 252 265 291 334 374 283 291 289 302 315 328 341 354 %Y/Y 11.6% 5.4% -9.9% 5.1% 9.9% 14.8% 11.8% 9.0% 13.8% 5.6% 11.6% 11.2% 12.6% 18.0% 17.2%
AfricaTotal 66 65 62 83 76 86 103 82 76 71 75 79 83 88 93
%Y/Y 14.0% -2.1% -5.3% 34.8% -8.3% 13.3% 20.0% 2.1% -10.6% -15.1% -9.2% -2.9% 10.1% 23.8% 23.9%Latin America
Total 355 384 356 383 427 462 492 410 417 437 444 451 458 465 472 %Y/Y 9.7% 8.2% -7.2% 7.6% 11.4% 8.1% 6.6% 8.3% 8.4% 13.4% 15.3% 10.0% 9.9% 6.4% 6.3%
Asia PacificTotal 241 252 243 269 258 278 313 273 251 249 257 265 273 281 290
%Y/Y 5.4% 4.7% -3.4% 10.7% -4.3% 7.7% 12.7% 6.4% -6.0% -9.7% -7.2% -2.9% 8.9% 12.8% 12.8%International Total, ex CIS
Total 1,005 1,079 997 1,094 1,172 1,300 1,442 1,166 1,146 1,169 1,206 1,243 1,280 1,318 1,357 %Y/Y 8.6% 7.3% -7.6% 9.8% 7.1% 10.9% 11.0% 9.7% 5.4% 5.3% 8.1% 6.6% 11.7% 12.7% 12.5%
World Total, ex. CISLand Total 2,759 2,984 2,000 2,646 3,131 3,382 3,705 3,139 2,825 3,212 3,349 3,480 3,114 3,410 3,524
%Y/Y 2.5% 8.1% -33.0% 32.3% 18.3% 8.0% 9.6% 23.7% 17.2% 16.4% 16.4% 10.9% 10.3% 6.2% 5.2%O/S Total 357 358 318 337 340 395 469 330 330 343 357 371 385 403 422
%Y/Y 0.4% 0.5% -11.3% 5.9% 0.9% 16.3% 18.8% -2.6% -4.9% 4.0% 7.7% 12.5% 16.8% 17.5% 18.2%Total 3,116 3,342 2,318 2,982 3,471 3,777 4,175 3,469 3,154 3,554 3,705 3,851 3,499 3,812 3,945
2.3% 7.3% -30.6% 28.7% 16.4% 8.8% 10.5% 20.6% 14.4% 15.1% 15.5% 11.0% 10.9% 7.3% 6.5%
QuartersYears
-
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Jan-05A
pr-05Jul-05O
ct-05Jan-06A
pr-06Jul-06O
ct-06Jan-07A
pr-07Jul-07O
ct-07Jan-08A
pr-08Jul-08O
ct-08Jan-09A
pr-09Jul-09O
ct-09Jan-10A
pr-10Jul-10O
ct-10Jan-11A
pr-11Jul-11
Rig
s / I
ncr.
1 m
bd O
il Pr
od. (
Rol
ling
10yr
)
101
94
42
5
2
1
0
(6)
(50) - 50 100 150
US Oil Rigs
Canada
US Gas Rigs
Latin America
Africa
Middle East
Europe
Asia Pacific
Current Number of Rigs Above/(Below) Our Forecast
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
Vertical Research Partners
13
Global Jackup Market Jackup Market Overview
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Jackup Market Breakdown (Includes Only Active Rigs)
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Standard & Premium Jackup Rig Count & Utilization
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Jackups TotalContracted Supply Util. (%) Low High 2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014
Australia/New Zealand 1 1 100% $0 $0 - 1 - - 3 16 2 1 1 3 1 1 Baltic 1 1 100% $0 $0 - - - - - - - - - - - - Central America 4 5 80% $130 $135 1 2 - 1 - 3 2 - - 1 1 - Canada - - $0 $0 - - - - - - - - - 5 1 - Caspian 3 6 50% $187 $187 - 2 2 - 1 6 6 1 1 2 13 1 Far East 31 34 91% $70 $70 7 16 6 3 3 - - - 1 - - - Indian Ocean 31 34 91% $43 $162 5 7 8 4 17 11 5 1 19 6 7 1 Meditteranean/Black Sea 15 21 71% $65 $138 3 9 3 - 3 5 3 1 2 3 1 1 Mexico 30 31 97% $22 $127 5 9 3 3 8 4 - - 22 14 - - Middle East 100 119 84% $48 $275 9 31 19 31 9 33 3 - 16 52 4 - North Sea/NW Europe 39 42 93% $70 $135 4 21 5 2 3 24 12 9 1 19 17 24 Russian Arctic - 1 0% $0 $0 - 2 - - South America 10 12 83% $115 $135 - 3 1 - - 4 - - - 2 - - Southeast Asia 51 64 80% $73 $165 9 29 26 11 14 45 10 2 5 37 5 1 US Alaska 1 1 100% $0 $0 - - 1 - - 1 1 - - 1 1 - US Gulf of Mexico 38 78 49% $36 $180 16 17 1 1 13 5 - - 3 1 - - West Africa 23 34 68% $70 $134 8 9 2 2 5 18 6 - 3 23 15 - Total World 378 484 78% 67 156 77 58 79 175 50 15 74 171 66 29
Rig Yr. Demand Indic.Dayrates ($kpd) Rollovers/Newbuild Arrivals Rig Demand Indications
Gulf of Mexico Commodity Jackups Middle East Jackup Market North Sea Jackup MarketJU Workover 1 6 17% JU <250-IC 20 25 80% JU Harsh High Spec 19 21 90%JU <200-MC 2 7 29% JU <250-MS 0 1 0% JU Harsh Standard 19 20 95%JU <250-IC 1 1 100% JU 250-IS 1 1 100% 38 41 93%JU <250-IS 0 1 0% JU 250-IC 26 30 87% Far East Jackup MarketJU <250-MS 0 1 0% JU 300-IC 29 36 81% JU <250-IC 15 15 100%JU 200-MC 8 19 42% JU 301-360-IC 10 12 83% JU <250-IS 5 5 100%JU 250-IS 0 1 0% JU 361-400-IC 13 13 100% JU 300-IS 0 1 0%JU 250-MC 3 4 75% JU >400-IC 1 1 100% JU 250-IC 2 2 100%JU 250-IC 4 4 100% 100 119 84% JU 300-IC 3 5 60%JU 250-MS 3 13 23% Indian Ocean Jackup Market JU 301-360-IC 3 3 100%JU 300-IS 0 1 0% JU <250-IC 1 1 100% JU 361-400-IC 3 3 100%JU >300-IS 1 3 33% JU 250-IS 1 1 100% 31 34 91%JU 300-MC 1 1 100% JU 250-MS 3 3 100% Other Jackup Markets
24 62 39% JU 300-IS 1 1 100% Commodity Jackups 13 21 62%Gulf of Mexico Standard / High Spec.Jackups JU 250-IC 1 2 50% JU 250-IC 7 9 78%JU 300-IC 4 6 67% JU 300-IC 17 19 89% JU 300-IC 11 20 55%JU 301-360-IC 7 7 100% JU 301-360-IC 6 6 100% JU 301-360-IC 17 21 81%JU 361-400-IC 3 3 100% JU 361-400-IC 1 1 100% JU 361-400-IC 9 9 100%JU >400-IC 1 3 33% 31 34 91% 57 80 93%
15 19 79% Southeast Asia Jackup MarketMexican Jackup Market JU <200-MC 1 1 100%JU 200-MC 1 2 50% JU <250-IC 0 2 0%JU 250-IC 8 8 100% JU >300-IS 1 1 100%JU 300-IC 12 12 100% JU 300-IC 17 26 65%JU 301-360-IC 1 1 100% JU 301-360-IC 7 7 100%JU 361-400-IC 7 7 100% JU 361-400-IC 24 26 92%JU >400-IC 1 1 100% 50 63 79%
25 27 93%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
Jan-01M
ay-01Sep-01Jan-02M
ay-02Sep-02Jan-03M
ay-03Sep-03Jan-04M
ay-04Sep-04Jan-05M
ay-05Sep-05Jan-06M
ay-06Sep-06Jan-07M
ay-07Sep-07Jan-08M
ay-08Sep-08Jan-09M
ay-09Sep-09Jan-10M
ay-10Sep-10Jan-11M
ay-11
Tota
l Util
izat
ion
(%)
Num
ber o
f Rig
s
Total Utilization Contracted
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
Vertical Research Partners
14
Jackup Dayrate Analysis & Forecast
Gulf of Mexico Jackup Dayrate History
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
North Sea Jackup Dayrate History
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
International Jackup Dayrate History
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Middle East Jackup Dayrate History
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Jackup Dayrate Forecast
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
Jan-
00Ju
n-00
Nov
-00
Apr
-01
Sep-
01Fe
b-02
Jul-0
2D
ec-0
2M
ay-0
3O
ct-0
3M
ar-0
4A
ug-0
4Ja
n-05
Jun-
05N
ov-0
5A
pr-0
6Se
p-06
Feb-
07Ju
l-07
Dec
-07
May
-08
Oct
-08
Mar
-09
Aug
-09
Jan-
10Ju
n-10
Nov
-10
Apr
-11
Day
rate
($/d
ay)
US GoM >300 US GoM 300 IC US GoM 250 ICUS GoM <300 Matt Rigs MX GoM 300 IC
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
Jan-
00Ju
n-00
Nov
-00
Apr
-01
Sep-
01Fe
b-02
Jul-0
2D
ec-0
2M
ay-0
3O
ct-0
3M
ar-0
4A
ug-0
4Ja
n-05
Jun-
05N
ov-0
5A
pr-0
6Se
p-06
Feb-
07Ju
l-07
Dec
-07
May
-08
Oct
-08
Mar
-09
Aug
-09
Jan-
10Ju
n-10
Nov
-10
Apr
-11
Day
rate
($/d
ay)
North Sea - Harsh High Spec. Jackup North Sea - Harsh Standard Jackup
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
Jan-
00Ju
n-00
Nov
-00
Apr
-01
Sep-
01Fe
b-02
Jul-0
2D
ec-0
2M
ay-0
3O
ct-0
3M
ar-0
4A
ug-0
4Ja
n-05
Jun-
05N
ov-0
5A
pr-0
6Se
p-06
Feb-
07Ju
l-07
Dec
-07
May
-08
Oct
-08
Mar
-09
Aug
-09
Jan-
10Ju
n-10
Nov
-10
Apr
-11
Day
rate
($/d
ay)
Southeast Asia >300 IC Southeast Asia 300 IC West Africa 300 ICWest Africa 250 IC Indian Ocean 300 IC
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
Jan-
00Ju
n-00
Nov
-00
Apr
-01
Sep-
01Fe
b-02
Jul-0
2D
ec-0
2M
ay-0
3O
ct-0
3M
ar-0
4A
ug-0
4Ja
n-05
Jun-
05N
ov-0
5A
pr-0
6Se
p-06
Feb-
07Ju
l-07
Dec
-07
May
-08
Oct
-08
Mar
-09
Aug
-09
Jan-
10Ju
n-10
Nov
-10
Apr
-11
Day
rate
($/d
ay)
Middle East 300 IC Middle East 250 IC
1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12<200 55 62 62 63 51 39 35 29 28 32 32 33 36 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
200 MS 59 66 78 78 65 45 32 29 32 34 33 33 35 36 37 38 39 40 45 50 200 MC 59 66 78 78 65 45 32 29 32 34 33 33 35 36 39 42 45 48 53 58 250 MS 57 65 72 74 71 70 70 30 32 33 32 32 33 34 37 40 43 46 51 56 250 MC 61 67 83 91 92 46 42 34 38 41 40 40 43 43 46 49 52 55 60 65
250 IC 112 125 127 129 118 91 85 64 63 66 69 69 68 65 68 71 74 77 77 77 300 IC 155 153 151 155 139 110 101 91 85 76 78 75 78 80 82 87 97 107 117 127 350 IC 173 163 172 182 166 133 110 99 105 104 108 115 104 103 113 123 133 143 143 143 400 IC 170 167 166 181 161 154 128 101 98 105 104 124 109 108 118 128 138 148 148 148 450 IC 170 167 166 181 161 154 128 101 98 105 104 124 109 108 118 128 138 148 148 148
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
Vertical Research Partners
15
Global Deepwater Markets Supply/Demand Dynamics in the Ultra-Deepwater Market
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Supply/Demand Dynamics in the Deepwater Market
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Ultra Deep & Deepwater Floater Rig Count & Utilization
Source: Vertical Research Partners
Ultra Deepwater TotalContracted Supply Util. (%) Low High 2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014
Australia/New Zealand 1 1 100% $460 $460 - 1 - - - - 1 - - - 1 - Baltic - - $0 $0 - - - - - - - - - - - - Central America - - $0 $0 - - - - - - - - - - - - Canada 1 1 100% $560 $560 - - - - - - - - - - - - Caspian - - $0 $0 - - - - - - - - - - - - Far East 2 2 100% $531 $531 1 4 21 8 1 - - - 3 - - - Indian Ocean 6 6 100% $490 $586 - 1 2 2 - 6 2 1 - 4 1 1 Meditteranean/Black Sea 2 2 100% $285 $703 - 1 - - - 1 2 - - 1 1 - Mexico 3 3 100% $465 $520 - - - - - - - - - - - - Middle East 1 1 100% $0 $0 - - - - - - - - - - - - North Sea/NW Europe - - $0 $0 - - 1 2 - 3 1 - - 1 1 - Russian Arctic - - $0 $0 - - 1 1 South America 27 27 100% $220 $600 - 2 3 3 - - 1 1 - - 1 1 Southeast Asia 7 7 100% $424 $558 1 6 1 2 - 1 2 1 - 1 2 1 US Alaska - - $0 $0 - - - - - 1 - - - 1 - - US Gulf of Mexico 19 19 100% $295 $659 - 3 5 6 4 - - - 1 - - - West Africa 16 16 100% $360 $665 1 3 4 5 - 8 4 - - 8 1 - Total World 85 85 100% 3 21 37 28 5 20 13 3 4 16 9 4
Demand IndicationsDayrates ($kpd) Rollovers/Newbuild Arrivals Rig Yr. Demand Indic.
Deepwater TotalContracted Supply Util. (%) Low High 2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014
Australia/New Zealand 2 2 100% $425 $470 - 1 - 2 - 3 - - - 1 - - Baltic - - $0 $0 - - - - - - - - - - - - Central America - - $0 $0 - - - - - - 1 - - - 1 - Canada 2 2 100% $335 $480 - - - - - - - - - - - - Caspian - - $0 $0 - - - - - - - - - - - - Far East - - $0 $0 - 1 - - - 1 - - - 1 - - Indian Ocean 1 1 100% $0 $0 - 2 - - - 5 - - - 1 - - Meditteranean/Black Sea 4 4 100% $505 $530 - 4 - - 1 2 5 - 1 5 2 - Mexico 1 1 100% $380 $380 - - - - - - 1 - - - 2 - Middle East - - $0 $0 - - - - - - - - - - - - North Sea/NW Europe 9 9 100% $390 $610 - - 1 1 - 2 1 - - 1 1 - Russian Arctic - - $0 $0South America 20 20 100% $245 $550 1 1 2 3 - 6 1 - - 19 1 - Southeast Asia 4 5 80% $0 $0 1 1 1 3 2 5 3 - 3 2 1 - US Alaska - - $0 $0 - - - - - - - - - - - - US Gulf of Mexico 5 5 100% $360 $580 1 1 1 1 7 5 - - 4 3 - - West Africa 8 9 89% $193 $620 1 6 2 2 5 20 8 1 3 13 10 1 Total World 56 58 97% 4 17 7 12 15 49 20 1 11 46 18 1
Dayrates ($kpd) Rollovers/Newbuild Arrivals Demand Indications Rig Yr. Demand Indic.
80%82%84%86%88%90%92%94%96%98%100%
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Jan-01M
ay-01Sep-01Jan-02M
ay-02Sep-02Jan-03M
ay-03Sep-03Jan-04M
ay-04Sep-04Jan-05M
ay-05Sep-05Jan-06M
ay-06Sep-06Jan-07M
ay-07Sep-07Jan-08M
ay-08Sep-08Jan-09M
ay-09Sep-09Jan-10M
ay-10Sep-10Jan-11M
ay-11
Tota
l Util
izat
ion
(%)
Num
ber o
f Rig
s
Total Utilization Contracted
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
Vertical Research Partners
16
Global Midwater Market
Supply/Demand Dynamics in the Midwater Market
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Midwater Floater Rig Count & Utilization
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Midwater TotalContracted Supply Util. (%) Low High 2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 201
Australia/New Zealand 6 6 100% $159 $390 2 2 1 - 3 18 4 3 1 7 2 1 Baltic - - $0 $0 - - - - - 1 - - - 1 - Central America - - $0 $0 - - - - - 5 2 - - 2 1 Canada 1 1 100% $0 $0 - - - - - - - - - 1 1 5 Caspian 4 7 57% $0 $0 1 1 - - - 1 1 - - 1 2 Far East 4 4 100% $256 $256 - 3 - 3 - 5 - - - 2 - Indian Ocean 5 5 100% $157 $260 - 2 - - 3 11 5 - 8 6 1 Meditteranean/Black Sea 3 5 60% $247 $247 - 2 1 - - 10 5 - - 8 6 Mexico - - $0 $0 - - - - - - - - - - - Middle East - - $0 $0 - - - - - 2 1 - - 1 1 North Sea/NW Europe 29 32 91% $0 $0 7 7 7 4 1 34 18 10 1 11 10 11 Russian Arctic - - $0 $0South America 31 31 100% $150 $480 1 3 8 2 3 11 1 - 2 14 1 Southeast Asia 10 21 48% $145 $305 1 5 - 1 9 26 7 - 3 10 4 US Alaska - - $0 $0 - - - - - - - - - - - US Gulf of Mexico 2 8 25% $383 $383 3 - - 1 2 1 - - 2 2 - West Africa 9 11 82% $185 $545 2 3 - - 2 35 7 - 1 13 5 Total World 104 131 79% 17 28 17 11 23 160 51 13 18 79 34 17
Rig Yr. Demand Indic.Dayrates ($kpd) Rollovers/Newbuild Arrivals Demand Indications
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
Jan-01M
ay-01Sep-01Jan-02M
ay-02Sep-02Jan-03M
ay-03Sep-03Jan-04M
ay-04Sep-04Jan-05M
ay-05Sep-05Jan-06M
ay-06Sep-06Jan-07M
ay-07Sep-07Jan-08M
ay-08Sep-08Jan-09M
ay-09Sep-09Jan-10M
ay-10Sep-10Jan-11M
ay-11
Tota
l Util
izat
ion
(%)
Num
ber o
f Rig
s
Total Utilization Contracted
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
17
A Cumulative Look at Rig Demand by Classification
Combined Ultra-Deepwater & Deepwater Market Cumulative Supply/Demand
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Ultra-Deepwater Market Cumulative Supply/Demand
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Midwater Market Cumulative Supply/Demand
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Deepwater Market Cumulative Supply/Demand
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Standard/Premium Jackup Cumulative Supply/Demand
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13
Cum
ulat
ive
Rig
Sup
ply
Cum
ulat
ive
Dem
and
(Rig
Yea
rs)
Tender Pre-tender Probable Possible Ultra Deepwater/Deepwater Incremental Supply
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13
Cum
ulat
ive
Rig
Sup
ply
Cum
ulat
ive
Dem
and
(Rig
Yea
rs)
Tender Pre-tenderProbable PossibleUltra Deepwater Incremental Supply
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13
Cum
ulat
ive
Rig
Sup
ply
Cum
ulat
ive
Dem
and
(Rig
Yea
rs)
Tender Pre-tender Probable Possible Midwater Incremental Supply
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13
Cum
ulat
ive
Rig
Sup
ply
Cum
ulat
ive
Dem
and
(Rig
Yea
rs)
Tender Pre-tender Probable Possible Deepwater Incremental Supply
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13
Cum
ulat
ive
Rig
Sup
ply
Cum
ulat
ive
Dem
and
(Rig
Yea
rs)
Tender Pre-tender Probable Possible Jackup Incremental Supply
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
Vertical Research Partners
18
Incremental Tendering Activity & Demand Indications
Incremental Tender Activity Since 2010
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners Incremental Pre-Tender Activity Since 2010
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11Jackup Midwater Deepwater Ultra Deepwater
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11Jackup Midwater Deepwater Ultra Deepwater
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
Vertical Research Partners
19
Floater Dayrate Analysis & Forecast
Ultra Deepwater Dayrate History
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Deepwater Dayrate History
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Midwater Dayrate History
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
North Sea Floater Dayrate History
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Floater Dayrate Forecast
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
Jan-00Jul-00Jan-01Jul-01Jan-02Jul-02Jan-03Jul-03Jan-04Jul-04Jan-05Jul-05Jan-06Jul-06Jan-07Jul-07Jan-08Jul-08Jan-09Jul-09Jan-10Jul-10Jan-11Jul-11
TAVe
rage
Day
rate
($pd
)
US GOM - Drillship >7500 US GOM - Drillship 5001-7500S America - Drillship >5000 W Africa - Drillship >5000Indian Ocean - Drillship >5000
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
Jan-00Jul-00Jan-01Jul-01Jan-02Jul-02Jan-03Jul-03Jan-04Jul-04Jan-05Jul-05Jan-06Jul-06Jan-07Jul-07Jan-08Jul-08Jan-09Jul-09Jan-10Jul-10Jan-11Jul-11
Aver
age
Day
rate
($pd
)
US GOM - Semi >7500 S America - Semi >5000 US GOM - Semi 5001-7500W Africa - Semi >5000 SE Asia - Semi 5001-7500
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
Jan-00Jul-00Jan-01Jul-01Jan-02Jul-02Jan-03Jul-03Jan-04Jul-04Jan-05Jul-05Jan-06Jul-06Jan-07Jul-07Jan-08Jul-08Jan-09Jul-09Jan-10Jul-10Jan-11Jul-11
Aver
age
Day
rate
($pd
)
S America - Semi 3001-5000 W Africa - Semi 3001-5000S America - Drillship 3001-5000 US GOM - Semi 3001-5000SE Asia - Semi 3001-5000
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
Jan-00Jul-00Jan-01Jul-01Jan-02Jul-02Jan-03Jul-03Jan-04Jul-04Jan-05Jul-05Jan-06Jul-06Jan-07Jul-07Jan-08Jul-08Jan-09Jul-09Jan-10Jul-10Jan-11Jul-11
Aver
age
Day
rate
($pd
)
Norway - Semi Harsh Standard UK - Semi Harsh Standard
1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 32G 330 320 310 340 340 390 290 220 220 260 250 250 250 240 240 250 260 270 3G 350 360 380 380 390 390 370 370 370 330 330 310 300 290 300 310 320 330 4G 380 500 530 570 410 370 430 290 320 390 300 300 290 340 340 350 360 370 5G 430 470 530 510 500 430 450 410 340 350 380 380 360 340 350 360 370 380 6G 510 480 480 570 590 390 410 470 410 410 370 380 370 380 400 410 430 440
Legacy Drillship 300 330 350 350 360 360 350 350 350 320 320 310 300 290 290 290 290 290 Modern Drillship 500 530 640 630 590 520 490 490 430 420 430 430 470 450 460 470 480 490
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
Vertical Research Partners
20
Jackup Fleet Expansion Jackup Newbuild Order Book
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Owner Rig Name Shipyard Country Market CategoryWater Depth Type
Order Date
Cost ($MM)
Deliv. Date
Deliv. Year Term Contract
1 Atwood Atwood Mako PPL Shipyard Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Oct-10 190$ Sep-12 20122 Atwood Atwood Manta PPL Shipyard Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Oct-10 190$ Dec-12 20123 Atwood Atwood Orca PPL Shipyard Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Jan-11 190$ Jun-13 20134 CPTDC CPTDC JU Tbn1 CPLEC China JU 300-IC 300 IC Oct-09 May-12 20125 Deepwater Drilling & Services Dynamic Vision Keppel FELS Singapore JU 301-360-IC 350 IC May-11 180$ Feb-13 2013 ONGC6 Drilling & Offshore Drilling & Offshore JU Tbn1 ABG Shipyard India JU Harsh High Spec 350 IC Nov-10 220$ Oct-13 20137 Drilling & Offshore Drilling & Offshore JU Tbn2 ABG Shipyard India JU Harsh High Spec 350 IC Nov-10 220$ Jun-14 20148 Ensco ENSCO JU Tbn1 Keppel FELS Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 400 IC Feb-11 230$ May-13 20139 Ensco ENSCO JU Tbn2 Keppel FELS Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 400 IC Feb-11 230$ Nov-13 2013
10 Ensco ENSCO JU Tbn3 Keppel FELS Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 400 IC Oct-11 260$ Aug-14 201411 Essar Oilfields Services Essar JU Tbn1 ABG Shipyard India JU 301-360-IC 350 IC Oct-08 229$ Jun-12 201212 Essar Oilfields Services Essar JU Tbn2 ABG Shipyard India JU 301-360-IC 350 IC Oct-08 229$ Jul-12 201213 Eurasia Drilling Eurasia Drilling JU Tbn1 Lamprell UAE JU 250-IC 250 IC Oct-10 210$ Apr-13 201314 Gazflot Arkticheskaya Zvezdochka Shipyard Russia JU 301-360-IC 328 IC Mar-95 100$ Nov-11 2011 Gazflot15 Great Offshore Great Offshore JU V351 Bharati Shipyard India JU 301-360-IC 350 IC Aug-06 165$ Apr-12 201216 Greatship Greatdrill Chaaya Lamprell UAE JU 301-360-IC 350 IC Feb-11 160$ Dec-12 2012 ONGC17 Gulf Drilling International GDI JU Tbn1 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 301-360-IC 350 IC May-11 197$ Aug-13 201318 Gulf Drilling International GDI JU Tbn2 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 301-360-IC 350 IC May-11 197$ Sep-14 201419 Hercules Offshore Discovery Offshore JU Tbn1 Keppel FELS Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 400 IC Jan-11 231$ Jun-13 201320 Hercules Offshore Discovery Offshore JU Tbn2 Keppel FELS Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 400 IC Jan-11 231$ Nov-13 201321 Japan Drilling Hakuryu-11 Keppel FELS Singapore JU >400-IC 425 IC Mar-11 210$ Mar-13 201322 Jasper Offshore Jasper Adventurer Keppel FELS Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Dec-10 180$ Nov-12 201223 Jasper Offshore Jasper Beacon Keppel FELS Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Apr-11 180$ May-13 201324 KS Energy KS JU Tbn1 COSCO Nantong China JU 361-400-IC 400 IC May-11 194$ Sep-13 201325 KS Energy KS JU Tbn2 COSCO Nantong China JU 361-400-IC 400 IC May-11 194$ Mar-14 201426 Maersk Drilling Maersk JU Tbn1 Keppel FELS Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 492 IC Feb-11 500$ Nov-13 2013 Operator Tba27 Maersk Drilling Maersk JU Tbn2 Keppel FELS Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 492 IC Feb-11 500$ Jul-14 201428 Maritime Industrial Services MIS JU Hull 108 Maritime Industrial Services UAE JU 300-IC 300 IC May-07 184$ Mar-12 201229 Mosvold Middle East Jackup Haffar I Maritime Industrial Services UAE JU 300-IC 300 IC May-07 184$ Oct-11 2011 PEMEX30 National Drilling Makhasib Lamprell UAE JU <250-IC 200 IC Jul-10 159$ May-12 201231 National Drilling Muhaiyimat Lamprell UAE JU <250-IC 200 IC Jul-10 159$ Sep-12 201232 Noble Noble JU Tbn1 Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 400 IC Dec-10 220$ Dec-12 201233 Noble Noble JU Tbn2 Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 400 IC Dec-10 220$ Jun-13 201334 Noble Noble JU Tbn3 Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 400 IC Mar-11 235$ Sep-13 201335 Noble Noble JU Tbn4 Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 400 IC Mar-11 235$ Feb-14 201436 Noble Noble JU Tbn5 Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 400 IC Aug-11 245$ Aug-14 201437 Noble Noble JU Tbn6 Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 400 IC Aug-11 245$ Nov-14 201438 North Atlantic Drilling West Linus Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd Singapore JU Harsh High Spec 492 IC Mar-11 530$ Sep-13 2013 ConocoPhillips39 Operadora Cicsa Independencia 1 Operadora Cicsa Mexico JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Jul-07 195$ Sep-11 201140 Perforadora Central Papaloapan Keppel AmFELS USA JU 361-400-IC 375 IC Feb-11 195$ Jan-13 201341 Petrobras P-59 Sao Roque do Paraguacu Brazil JU 301-360-IC 350 IC Sep-08 Jan-12 2012 Petrobras42 Petrobras P-60 Sao Roque do Paraguacu Brazil JU 301-360-IC 350 IC Sep-08 May-12 2012 Petrobras43 Prospector Offshore Drilling Prospector JU Tbn1 Dalian Shipbuilding Industry Co. China JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Dec-10 206$ Nov-12 201244 Prospector Offshore Drilling Prospector JU Tbn2 Dalian Shipbuilding Industry Co. China JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Dec-10 206$ Jan-13 201345 Prospector Offshore Drilling Prospector JU Tbn3 Dalian Shipbuilding Industry Co. China JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Apr-11 220$ Aug-13 201346 Prospector Offshore Drilling Prospector JU Tbn4 Dalian Shipbuilding Industry Co. China JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Apr-11 220$ Sep-13 201347 Prospector Offshore Drilling Prospector JU Tbn5 Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuildin China JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Aug-11 211$ Feb-14 201448 Prospector Offshore Drilling Prospector JU Tbn6 Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuildin China JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Aug-11 211$ May-14 201449 Rowan Joe Douglas LeTourneau USA JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Mar-08 257$ Dec-11 2011 McMoRan50 Saudi Aramco Saudi Aramco JU Tbn1 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 300-IC 300 IC Jan-10 Sep-12 2012 Saudi Aramco51 Seadrill AOR1 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Dec-10 206$ Feb-13 201352 Seadrill AOR2 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Dec-10 206$ Mar-13 201353 Seadrill AOR3 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Jun-11 189$ Aug-13 201354 Seadrill West Castor Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Oct-10 200$ Dec-12 201255 Seadrill West Oberon Dalian Shipbuilding Industry Co. China JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Nov-10 190$ Mar-13 201356 Seadrill West Telesto Dalian Shipbuilding Industry Co. China JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Nov-10 190$ Dec-12 201257 Seadrill West Tucana Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Oct-10 200$ Mar-13 201358 Standard Drilling Standard JU Tbn5 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Nov-10 185$ Jul-12 201259 Standard Drilling Standard JU Tbn6 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Jan-11 184$ Feb-13 201360 Standard Drilling Standard JU Tbn7 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Jan-11 184$ Jun-13 201361 Standard Drilling Standard JU Tbn8 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC May-11 196$ Jul-13 201362 Standard Drilling Standard JU Tbn9 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC May-11 196$ Nov-13 201363 Standard Drilling Standard JU Tbn10 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC May-11 196$ Dec-13 201364 Standard Drilling Standard JU Tbn11 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC May-11 196$ May-14 201465 Transocean Transocean Honor PPL Shipyard Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Nov-09 195$ Nov-11 201166 Transocean Transocean JU Tbn2 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 301-360-IC 350 IC Feb-11 200$ Dec-12 2012 Chevron67 Transocean Transocean JU Tbn3 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 301-360-IC 350 IC Feb-11 200$ Jun-13 2013 Chevron68 Transocean Transocean JU Tbn4 Keppel FELS Singapore JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Aug-11 195$ Jul-13 2013 Chevron69 Vietsovpetro Tam Dao 03 PV Shipyard Vietnam JU 300-IC 300 IC Jan-09 180$ Mar-12 2012 Vietsovpetro70 Vietsovpetro Vietsovpetro JU Tbn3 JU 361-400-IC 400 IC 201471 Yantai Raffles Caspian Driller Yantai CIMC Raffles China JU 300-IC 300 IC Dec-09 Mar-12 2012 Dragon Oil72 Yantai Raffles Yantai Raffles JU Tbn3 Yantai CIMC Raffles China JU 300-IC 300 IC Apr-08 Oct-11 201173 ZPMC Zhenhai 1 ZPMC Nantong China JU 361-400-IC 400 IC Jun-11 Apr-13 2013
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
Vertical Research Partners
21
Floater Fleet Expansion Floater Newbuild Order Book
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Owner Rig Name Shipyard Country Market CategoryWater Depth Type
Order Date
Cost ($MM)
Deliv. Date
Deliv. Year
Term Contract
1 Vantage Drilling Dalian Developer COSCO Dalian China Drillship >7500 10,000 Apr-06 Dec-12 20122 Atw ood Atw ood Advantage Daew oo South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Jan-11 600$ Sep-13 20133 Atw ood Atw ood Condor Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd Singapore Semi >7500 10,000 Jul-08 750$ Jun-12 20124 CNOOC Hai Yang Shi You 981 Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding China Semi 5001-7500 7,500 Dec-06 599$ Oct-11 2011 CNOOC5 COSL COSLInnovator Yantai CIMC Raffles China Semi Harsh High Spec 1,640 Apr-06 460$ Dec-11 2011 Statoil6 COSL COSLPromoter Yantai Raff les China Semi Harsh High Spec 1,640 Jan-07 460$ Mar-12 2012 Statoil7 Diamond Offshore Ocean BlackHaw k Hyundai Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Jan-11 590$ Jun-13 2013 Anadarko8 Diamond Offshore Ocean BlackHornet Hyundai Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Feb-11 590$ Dec-13 2013 Anadarko9 Diamond Offshore Ocean BlackRhino Hyundai Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 May-11 610$ May-14 2014
10 Dolphin Fred Olsen Drsh Tbn1 Hyundai Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Apr-11 615$ Sep-13 201311 Ensco ENSCO 8505 Keppel FELS Singapore Semi >7500 8,500 May-08 537$ Jan-12 201212 Ensco ENSCO 8506 Keppel FELS Singapore Semi >7500 8,500 Aug-08 560$ Jul-12 201213 Ensco ENSCO DS-6 Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Aug-08 790$ Dec-11 201114 Ensco ENSCO DS-7 Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Dec-10 600$ Jul-13 201315 Etesco Etesco Takatsugu J Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Jul-08 820$ Jan-12 2012 Petrobras16 Gazflot Polyarnaya Zvezda Vyborg Shipyard Russia Semi Harsh High Spec 1,148 Nov-07 Sep-11 2011 Gazflot17 Gazflot Severnoye Siyanie Vyborg Shipyard Russia Semi Harsh High Spec 1,148 Nov-07 Sep-11 2011 Gazflot18 IPC La Muralla IV Daew oo South Korea Semi >7500 10,000 Aug-08 709$ Sep-11 201119 Island Offshore Island Innovator COSCO Nantong China Semi Harsh High Spec 2,300 Mar-07 560$ Mar-12 201220 Maersk Drilling Maersk Drsh Tbn1 Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Apr-11 650$ Aug-13 201321 Maersk Drilling Maersk Drsh Tbn2 Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Apr-11 650$ Nov-13 201322 Maersk Drilling Maersk Drsh Tbn3 Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Jul-11 650$ May-14 201423 Maersk Drilling Maersk Drsh Tbn4 Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Jul-11 650$ Aug-14 201424 Noble Noble Bully I Shanghai Shipyard China Drillship >7500 12,000 Oct-07 610$ Dec-11 2011 Shell25 Noble Noble Bully II Shanghai Shipyard China Drillship >7500 12,000 Dec-07 632$ Nov-11 2011 Shell26 Noble Noble Drsh Tbn5 Hyundai Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Jan-11 605$ Jun-13 2013 Shell27 Noble Noble Drsh Tbn6 Hyundai Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Jan-11 605$ Dec-13 201328 Noble Noble Drsh Tbn7 Hyundai Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Mar-11 615$ May-14 201429 Noble Noble Drsh Tbn8 Hyundai Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Sep-11 630$ Sep-14 201430 Noble Noble Globe Trotter STX Offshore & Shipbuilding China Drillship >7500 10,000 Sep-08 585$ Dec-11 2011 Shell31 Noble Noble Globe Trotter 2 STX Offshore & Shipbuilding China Drillship >7500 10,000 Jun-10 550$ Jun-13 2013 Shell32 Ocean Rig OCR Drillship Tbn1 Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Apr-11 638$ Jul-13 201333 Ocean Rig OCR Drillship Tbn2 Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Apr-11 638$ Oct-13 201334 Ocean Rig OCR Drillship Tbn3 Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Jun-11 638$ Nov-13 201335 Odebrecht Odebrecht Drsh Tbn5 Daew oo South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Dec-10 May-13 201336 Odebrecht Odebrecht Semi Tbn1 Daew oo South Korea Semi Harsh Deepw ater 10,000 Dec-10 Oct-13 201337 Odebrecht ODN I Daew oo South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Dec-09 579$ Jan-12 2012 Petrobras38 Odebrecht ODN II Daew oo South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Dec-09 579$ Mar-12 2012 Petrobras39 Odfjell Drilling Deepsea Metro II Hyundai Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Jun-08 668$ Nov-11 2011 Petrobras40 Opus Offshore Opus Drsh Tbn1 Shanghai Shipyard China Drillship <=3000 3,000 Sep-11 Mar-14 201441 Opus Offshore Opus Drsh Tbn2 Shanghai Shipyard China Drillship <=3000 3,000 Sep-11 Sep-14 201442 Pacif ic Drilling Pacif ic Khamsin Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Mar-11 550$ Apr-13 201343 Pacif ic Drilling Pacif ic Santa Ana Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Mar-08 650$ Dec-11 2011 Chevron44 Pacif ic Drilling Pacif ic Sharav Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Mar-11 550$ Sep-13 201345 Petroserv SSV Catarina Daew oo South Korea Semi >7500 10,000 Dec-09 526$ Apr-12 201246 Queiroz Galvao Amaralina Star Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Nov-10 Jul-12 2012 Petrobras47 Queiroz Galvao Laguna Star Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Nov-10 Sep-12 2012 Petrobras48 Row an Row an Drsh Tbn1 Hyundai Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Jun-11 740$ Sep-13 201349 Row an Row an Drsh Tbn2 Hyundai Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Jun-11 738$ Dec-13 201350 Saipem Scarabeo 8 Fincantieri Italy Semi Harsh Deepw ater 9,843 Jun-05 615$ Dec-11 2011 Eni51 Schahin Cerrado Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Jun-08 682$ Oct-11 2011 Petrobras52 Schahin Sertao Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Jun-08 709$ Nov-11 2011 Petrobras53 Seadrill West Auriga Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Nov-10 595$ Feb-13 201354 Seadrill West Capricorn Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd Singapore Semi 5001-7500 7,500 May-08 771$ Dec-11 201155 Seadrill West Leo Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd Singapore Semi >7500 10,000 Jun-06 510$ Dec-11 201156 Seadrill West Tellus Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Apr-11 600$ Aug-13 201357 Seadrill West Vela Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Nov-10 595$ May-13 201358 Sete Brasil Sete Brasil Drsh Tbn1 Estaleiro Atlantico Sul Brazil Drillship >7500 10,000 Feb-11 662$ Jan-15 2015 Petrobras59 Sete Brasil Sete Brasil Drsh Tbn2 Estaleiro Atlantico Sul Brazil Drillship >7500 10,000 Feb-11 662$ Jul-15 2015 Petrobras60 Sete Brasil Sete Brasil Drsh Tbn3 Estaleiro Atlantico Sul Brazil Drillship >7500 10,000 Feb-11 662$ Jan-16 2016 Petrobras61 Sete Brasil Sete Brasil Drsh Tbn4 Estaleiro Atlantico Sul Brazil Drillship >7500 10,000 Feb-11 662$ Jul-16 2016 Petrobras62 Sete Brasil Sete Brasil Drsh Tbn5 Estaleiro Atlantico Sul Brazil Drillship >7500 10,000 Feb-11 662$ Jan-17 2017 Petrobras63 Sete Brasil Sete Brasil Drsh Tbn6 Estaleiro Atlantico Sul Brazil Drillship >7500 10,000 Feb-11 662$ Jul-17 2017 Petrobras64 Sete Brasil Sete Brasil Drsh Tbn7 Estaleiro Atlantico Sul Brazil Drillship >7500 10,000 Feb-11 662$ Jan-18 2018 Petrobras65 Sevan Drilling Sevan Brasil COSCO Nantong China Semi >7500 10,000 Jun-08 685$ Mar-12 2012 Petrobras66 Sevan Drilling Sevan UDW3 COSCO Nantong China Semi >7500 10,000 May-11 526$ Dec-13 201367 Sevan Drilling Sevan UDW4 COSCO Nantong China Semi >7500 10,000 May-11 526$ May-14 201468 Songa Offshore Songa Semi Tbn2 Daew oo South Korea Semi Harsh High Spec 1,640 Jul-11 565$ Feb-14 2014 Statoil69 Songa Offshore Songa Semi Tbn3 Daew oo South Korea Semi Harsh High Spec 1,640 Jul-11 565$ Aug-14 2014 Statoil70 Stena Stena DrillMAX ICE Samsung Heavy Industries South Korea Drillship >7500 7,500 Apr-08 1,150$ Feb-12 201271 TMT DragonQuest Daew oo South Korea Drillship >7500 10,000 Dec-07 782$ Oct-11 2011 Petrobras72 Transocean Aker Drsh Tbn1 Daew oo South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Jan-11 600$ Oct-13 201373 Transocean Aker Drsh Tbn2 Daew oo South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 Jan-11 600$ Dec-13 201374 Vantage Drilling Tungsten Explorer Daew oo South Korea Drillship >7500 12,000 May-11 590$ May-13 2013
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
Vertical Research Partners
22
Offshore Driller Valuation Methodology Offshore Contract Driller Valuation Overview
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Base Rig Market Values
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Historical High Spec. & Standard Jackup Values
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Implied Avg. Dayrates in Rig Values Well Below 10 Year Avg. & Leading Edge Rates
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Historical Floater Market Values
Source: ODS Petrodata, Vertical Research Partners
Price Return to TGT NAV P/NAV P/NAV Dividend DPS/ Net Debt/Rating Price Target Target '12 PE 2011 2011 2012 P/E ('12) Yield Cash EPS Gross Fleet Value
RIG US Equity Transocean Buy 46$ 98$ 111% 14.0X 75$ 62% 59% 6.6X 6.8% 45% 21.8%DO Equity Diamond Offshore Buy 56$ 100$ 79% 16.5X 94$ 59% 58% 9.2X 6.3% 33% 3.2%SDRL Equity Seadrill Buy 29$ 49$ 69% 15.1X 18$ 161% 150% 8.9X 10.4% 106% 40.4%RDC Equity Rowan Buy 31$ 52$ 68% 11.9X 49$ 63% 57% 7.1X 0.0% 0% 0.6%HERO US Equity Hercules Offshore Buy 3$ 8$ 189% na 4$ 62% 55% na 0.0% 0% 53.8%NE Equity Noble Hold 30$ 47$ 59% 10.4X 36$ 83% 78% 6.5X 1.7% 15% 23.1%ESV Equity ENSCO Hold 41$ 63$ 53% 10.9X 49$ 84% 75% 7.2X 3.4% 34% 23.8%ATW Equity Atwood Oceanics Hold 36$ 52$ 48% 12.0X 45$ 78% 70% 8.2X 0.0% 0% 7.5%
$12
$11
$17
$13
$35
$40
$50
$190
$200
$210
$170
$210
$300
$550
$600
$600
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
<200
200 MS
200 MC
250 MS
250 MC
250 IC
300 IC
350 IC
400 IC
450 IC
2G
3G
4G
5G
6G
Drillship
Second Hand Market Values (Adjusted from ODSPetrodata)
$-
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250Jul-01D
ec-01M
ay-02O
ct-02M
ar-03A
ug-03Jan-04Jun-04N
ov-04A
pr-05Sep-05Feb-06Jul-06D
ec-06M
ay-07O
ct-07M
ar-08A
ug-08Jan-09Jun-09N
ov-09A
pr-10Sep-10Feb-11
Rig
Mar
ket V
alue
($m
)
350 ft IC 300 feet (Harsh Env.) 300 ft IC (Standard) 250 ft IC
$31
$30
$33
$31
$42
$47
$65
$126
$128
$131
$167
$196
$226
$328
$343
$373
$40
$47
$47
$47
$52
$72
$87
$101
$105
$105
$169
$216
$261
$275
$304
$337
$36.0
$35.8
$35.8
$33.8
$43.0
$68.1
$78.9
$104.5
$110.0
$110.0
$252.7
$304.6
$292.8
$360.0
$377.5
$478.4
$- $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600
<200
200 MS
200 MC
250 MS
250 MC
250 IC
300 IC
350 IC
400 IC
450 IC
2G
3G
4G
5G
6G
Drillship
Leading Edge RateAverage Fixture (2000-Present)Implied Avg. Dayrate Over Asset Life ($kpd)
$(50)
$50
$150
$250
$350
$450
$550
$650
$750
Jan-06A
pr-06Jul-06O
ct-06Jan-07A
pr-07Jul-07O
ct-07Jan-08A
pr-08Jul-08O
ct-08Jan-09A
pr-09Jul-09O
ct-09Jan-10A
pr-10Jul-10O
ct-10Jan-11A
pr-11
Rig
Mar
ket V
alue
($m
)
3G 3G (Harsh Env.) 4G 5G 6G
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
23
Dividend Yield-Based Valuations
Dividend Yield to Payout Ratio Relationship
Source: ODS Petrodata, Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Potential for Yield-Based Valuation Premiums
Source: ODS Petrodata, Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
DO
ATW
NE
RIG
SDRL
HERO
ESV
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%110%120%130%140%
Div
iden
d Yi
eld
(2Q
11 D
Ps A
nnua
lized
)
DPS/CEPS
DO
ATWNE
RIG
SDRL
-6.0%
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250%
Div
iden
d Yi
eld
(2Q
11 D
Ps A
nnua
lized
)
Price / NAV
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
24
North American Natural Gas US Natural Gas Storage
Source: EIA, Vertical Research Partners
Relative Storage & Gas Prices
Source: Bloomberg, EIA, Vertical Research Partners CAPEX Funded by CFO (Funding Gap/Surplus)
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners Note: Natural Gas Levered E&P companies included in calculations: SWN, RRC, APA, DVN, APC, CHK, ECA, EOG, NBL, STR, FST
US Natural Gas Storage Injections
Source: EIA, Vertical Research Partners
NYMEX 12-month Strip
Source: Vertical Research Partners Gas-Levered E&P Funding Status
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Trill
ions
of C
ubic
Fee
t
5-Yr. Range 2009 2010 2011
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
105%
110%
115%
120%$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
$8.00
$9.00
$10.00
Jan-06A
pr-06Jun-06Sep-06D
ec-06M
ar-07Jun-07A
ug-07N
ov-07Feb-08M
ay-08Jul-08O
ct-08Jan-09A
pr-09Jun-09Sep-09D
ec-09M
ar-10M
ay-10A
ug-10N
ov-10Feb-11A
pr-11Jul-11
Stor
age
% o
f 5yr
Ave
rage
Nat
ural
Gas
Pric
e
Gas Price Storage % of 5 Year Average
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%110%120%130%140%150%
Mar
-97
Sep-
97M
ar-9
8Se
p-98
Mar
-99
Sep-
99M
ar-0
0Se
p-00
Mar
-01
Sep-
01M
ar-0
2Se
p-02
Mar
-03
Sep-
03M
ar-0
4Se
p-04
Mar
-05
Sep-
05M
ar-0
6Se
p-06
Mar
-07
Sep-
07M
ar-0
8Se
p-08
Mar
-09
Sep-
09M
ar-1
0Se
p-10
Mar
-11
CFO
/ C
APEX
(300)
(250)
(200)
(150)
(100)
(50)
0
50
100
150
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
(Bcf
)
5 Year Range 2010 2009 2011
$3.40 $3.50 $3.60 $3.70 $3.80 $3.90 $4.00 $4.10 $4.20 $4.30 $4.40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Natural Gas 12-Month Strip
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2,200
Mar-97
Oct-97
May-98
Dec-98
Jul-99Feb-00Sep-00A
pr-01N
ov-01Jun-02Jan-03A
ug-03M
ar-04O
ct-04M
ay-05D
ec-05Jul-06Feb-07Sep-07A
pr-08N
ov-08Jun-09Jan-10A
ug-10M
ar-11
CFO
& C
APEX
(Ind
exed
)
CFO CAPEX
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
25
Global Oil Markets
Oil’s Marginal Cost Curve
Source: IEA, Bloomberg
Latest
R² = 0.88
$-
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
$100
$110
$120
$130
$140
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93
Bre
nt, $
/bbl
Oil Supplied (mbd)
IEA '11 Demand Forecast
IEA '12 Demand Forecast
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
26
Key Oil Market Metrics
IEA 2010-2011 Demand Forecast
Source: IEA, Vertical Research Partners
Total OPEC vs Saudi Arabia Sustainable Production Capacity
Source: IEA, Vertical Research Partners; Note: Includes NGL production
IEA Non-OPEC Supply Forecast
Source: IEA, Vertical Research Partners
IEA Implied Forecast ‘Call on OPEC’ (Forecasted World Demand Less Forecasted Non-OPEC Supply)
Source: IEA, Vertical Research Partners
OPEC Spare Capacity & Brent Crude Price
Source: IEA, Vertical Research Partners
85.0 85.1 85.5
85.9 86.0 86.1 86.1 86.3 86.4 86.4 86.4 86.4 86.5 86.6 86.6 86.9
87.3 87.5 87.7 87.8 87.9 87.9 87.9 88.0
88.3 88.3 87.8 87.9 87.9
88.2 88.5
88.8 89.1 89.3 89.4 89.4 89.2 89.3
89.5 89.5 89.3
91.0 91.1 90.7
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
Jul-09A
ug-09Sep-09O
ct-09N
ov-09D
ec-09Jan-10Feb-10M
ar-10A
pr-10M
ay-10Jun-10Jul-10A
ug-10Sep-10O
ct-10N
ov-10D
ec-10Jan-11Feb-11M
ar-11A
pr-11M
ay-11Jun-11Jul-11A
ug-11Sep-11
Dem
and
(mbd
)
2010 2011 2012
10.0 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.8 11.0 11.2 11.4 11.6 11.8 12.0 12.2 12.4
33.0 33.2 33.4 33.6 33.8 34.0 34.2 34.4 34.6 34.8 35.0 35.2 35.4 35.6 35.8
Jan-
07A
pr-0
7Ju
l-07
Oct
-07
Jan-
08A
pr-0
8Ju
l-08
Oct
-08
Jan-
09A
pr-0
9Ju
l-09
Oct
-09
Jan-
10A
pr-1
0Ju
l-10
Oct
-10
Jan-
11A
pr-1
1Ju
l-11 Sa
udi A
rabi
a Su
stai
nabl
e C
apac
ity (m
bd)
Tota
l OPE
C S
usta
inab
le C
aaci
ty (m
bd)
Total OPEC Sustainable Production CapacitySaudi Arabia Susutainable Production Capacity (incl. %50 Neutral Zone)
51.2 51.4 51.5
51.6
51.9
51.7 51.5
51.6 51.8
52.0 52.3 52.3 52.4
52.6 52.6
53.3
53.5
53.0 52.8
52.9 52.9 53.1
53.4 53.4 53.4 53.5 53.6 53.7 53.7
53.3 53.1 53.0
52.8
54.0 54.0 53.8
51.0
51.5
52.0
52.5
53.0
53.5
54.0
54.5
Jul-0
9A
ug-0
9Se
p-09
Oct
-09
Nov
-09
Dec
-09
Jan-
10Fe
b-10
Mar
-10
Apr
-10
May
-10
Jun-
10Ju
l-10
Aug
-10
Sep-
10O
ct-1
0N
ov-1
0D
ec-1
0Ja
n-11
Feb-
11M
ar-1
1A
pr-1
1M
ay-1
1Ju
n-11
Jul-1
1A
ug-1
1Se
p-11
2010 2011 2012
35.1 35.0 35.0
34.8
34.5
34.8
35.1 35.0 35.1
35.3 35.2 35.4 35.4 35.4 35.4
34.6 34.5
35.3
35.1 35.0 35.0
35.1 35.2
35.4
35.7 35.8 35.7 35.7 35.5
36.0
36.5 36.5 36.5
37.0 37.1
36.9
34.0
34.5
35.0
35.5
36.0
36.5
37.0
37.5
Jul-09A
ug-09Sep-09O
ct-09N
ov-09D
ec-09Jan-10Feb-10M
ar-10A
pr-10M
ay-10Jun-10Jul-10A
ug-10Sep-10O
ct-10N
ov-10D
ec-10Jan-11Feb-11M
ar-11A
pr-11M
ay-11Jun-11Jul-11A
ug-11Sep-11
mbd
2010 2011 2012
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
Jan-01Jul-01Jan-02Jul-02Jan-03Jul-03Jan-04Jul-04Jan-05Jul-05Jan-06Jul-06Jan-07Jul-07Jan-08Jul-08Jan-09Jul-09Jan-10Jul-10Jan-11Jul-11
Oil
Px
OPE
C S
pare
Cap
acity
% S
uppl
y
OPEC Spare Capacity as % of Supply Brent Crude Px
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
27
Global Oil Demand & Economics
Incremental Oil Demand 2010-2011 (IEA Estimate)
Source: IEA, Vertical Research Partners
WTI and Brent Oil Price Strip
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Oil Demand Forecast Revision History
Source: IEA, Vertical Research Partners
Consensus GDP Forecast 2011
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
2011/2012 IEA Demand Forecast vs. GDP/Oil Intensity
Source: Bloomberg, IMF, IEA, Vertical Research Partners
PMI History
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
(0.08)
(0.02)
0.11
0.07
0.17
(0.05)
0.18
0.23
(0.24)
0.53
1.10
(0.21)
0.05
0.33
0.15
0.27
0.28
0.45
0.32
0.51
1.01
3.11
(0.5) - 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
OECD Europe
Africa Non-OECD
India Non-OECD
OECD Asia/Pacific
Latin America Non-OECD
Other Asia Non-OECD
FSU Non-OECD
Middle East Non-OECD
OECD North America
China Non-OECD
Total World Incremental Demand
mbd2010 2011
$96.00 $97.00 $98.00 $99.00 $100.00 $101.00 $102.00 $103.00 $104.00 $105.00 $106.00 $107.00
$82
$83
$83
$84
$84
$85
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Bre
nt $
/bbl
WTI
$/b
bl
WTI 12-Month Strip Brent 12-Month Strip
(0.20)
(0.10)
-
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
Rev
isio
ns to
201
1 Es
timat
es (m
bd)
-6.0%
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
Qatar
China
Argentina
IndonesiaC
hileTurkeyH
ong Kong
SingaporePhilippinesTaiw
anR
ussiaO
man
Saudi Arabia
South Korea
PolandM
exicoU
AE
ThailandVenezuelaSouth A
fricaB
razilG
ermany
Canada
Euro Union
Norw
ayFranceU
SAEgyptSpainU
KJapanIrelandPortugalG
reece
2011 Real GDP Growth Forecast Y/Y 2012 Real GDP Growth Y/Y
1993
1994
19951996
1997
1998
1999
20002001
2002
200320052006
2007
20082009
20042010
2012 Est.
2011 est.
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
-1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6%
Glo
bal O
il D
eman
d G
row
th
Global Real GDP Growth
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
Mar-05
Jul-05N
ov-05M
ar-06Jul-06N
ov-06M
ar-07Jul-07N
ov-07M
ar-08Jul-08N
ov-08M
ar-09Jul-09N
ov-09M
ar-10Jul-10N
ov-10M
ar-11Jul-11
PMI (
Rep
orte
d)
Europe PMI China Manufacturing PMI ISM US Manf'g
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
28
Oil in Transit
Middle East & Africa: Westbound Sailings
Source: Vertical Research Partners
Middle East: Westbound Oil in Transit
Source: Vertical Research Partners
West of Suez Long-Haul Arrivals
Source: Vertical Research Partners
Middle East & Africa: Eastbound Sailings
Source: Vertical Research Partners
Middle East: Eastbound Oil in Transit
Source: Vertical Research Partners
East of Suez Long-Haul Arrivals
Source: Vertical Research Partners
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mill
. bbl
s
Source: Oil Movements2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mill
. bb
ls
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
20.0
20.5
21.0
21.5
22.0
22.5
23.0
23.5
24.0
24.5
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
mbd
Source: Oil Movements2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
15.5
16.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mill
. bbl
s
Source: Oil Movements2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mill
. bb
ls
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
12.0
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
mbd
Source: Oil Movements2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
29
US Oil Demand & Oil Stocks
Crude Product Stocks, ex SPR
Source: EIA, Vertical Research Partners
Gasoline Stocks
Source: EIA, Vertical Research Partners
Distillate Fuel Stocks
Source: EIA, Vertical Research Partners
Total Product Demand
Source: EIA, Vertical Research Partners
Gasoline Demand
Source: EIA, Vertical Research Partners
Distillate Demand
Source: EIA, Vertical Research Partners
900
950
1,000
1,050
1,100
1,150
1,200
Jan Feb Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mill
. bbl
.
2008 2009 2007 2010 2011
175
185
195
205
215
225
235
245
Jan Feb Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
mill
. bbl
2008 2009 2007 2010 2011
100,000
110,000
120,000
130,000
140,000
150,000
160,000
170,000
180,000
Jan Feb Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
mill
. bbl
2008 2009 2007 2010 2011
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Jan Feb Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mbd
2008 2009 2007 2010 2011
8.6 8.7 8.8 8.9 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.9
Jan Feb Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
mbd
2008 2009 2007 2010 2011
3,000
3,200
3,400
3,600
3,800
4,000
4,200
4,400
4,600
4,800
5,000
Jan Feb Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
mbd
2008 2009 2007 2010 2011
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
30
Global Oil Stocks and Refining Margins
ARA Oil Stocks
Source: Vertical Research Partners
Japan Oil Stocks
Source: Vertical Research Partners
Korea Oil Stocks
Source: Vertical Research Partners
Singapore Oil Stocks
Source: Vertical Research Partners
Global Refining Margins
Source: Vertical Research Partners
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
Jan Feb Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mill
. bbl
.
2009 2010 2011
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mill
. bbl
.
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
mill
. bbl
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
mill
. bbl
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
$- $5
$10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40
Sep-
08O
ct-0
8N
ov-0
8D
ec-0
8Ja
n-09
Feb-
09M
ar-0
9A
pr-0
9M
ay-0
9Ju
n-09
Jul-0
9A
ug-0
9Se
p-09
Oct
-09
Nov
-09
Dec
-09
Jan-
10Fe
b-10
Mar
-10
Apr
-10
May
-10
Jun-
10Ju
l-10
Aug
-10
Sep-
10O
ct-1
0N
ov-1
0D
ec-1
0Ja
n-11
Feb-
11M
ar-1
1A
pr-1
1M
ay-1
1Ju
n-11
Jul-1
1A
ug-1
1Se
p-11
USGC 3-2-1 NW Europe 3-2-1 Dubai 3-2-1 Breakeven Economics
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
31
Earnings Summary
Company Category 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 2011 2012Schlumberger EPS 4.46 2.74 2.85 3.75 5.42 0.71 0.87 1.02 1.16 1.25 1.27 1.40 1.51 -1% 2%
Previous EPS 3.80 6.54 1.02 1.21 1.41 1.50 1.75 1.91 Consensus EPS 3.80 5.34 1.03 1.21 1.19 1.28 1.42 1.57
Consensus EPS-High 4.05 5.90 1.12 1.37 1.29 1.37 1.54 1.77 Consensus EPS-Low 3.68 3.85 0.98 1.12 1.10 1.21 1.32 1.42
Halliburton EPS 2.90 1.34 2.08 3.42 3.94 0.65 0.81 0.94 1.02 1.06 0.93 0.98 0.97 2% -12%Previous EPS 3.47 5.00 0.65 0.81 0.95 1.05 1.18 1.11 1.31 1.41
Consensus EPS 3.36 4.45 0.91 1.03 1.05 1.10 1.17 1.23 Consensus EPS-High 3.50 5.40 0.96 1.12 1.19 1.28 1.41 1.51 Consensus EPS-Low 2.97 3.30 0.63 0.91 0.97 0.96 0.92 1.00
Baker Hughes EPS 5.36 1.91 2.28 4.33 5.42 0.87 0.93 1.19 1.33 1.39 1.28 1.37 1.39 -1% -7%Previous EPS 4.38 6.65 0.87 0.93 1.21 1.37 1.53 1.40 1.78 1.94
Consensus EPS 4.38 5.85 1.21 1.37 1.38 1.37 1.58 1.73 Consensus EPS-High 4.54 6.90 1.28 1.50 1.48 1.50 1.85 2.07 Consensus EPS-Low 4.14 4.74 1.11 1.17 1.21 1.20 1.37 1.43
Weatherford EPS 2.00 0.36 0.49 0.82 1.40 0.10 0.17 0.25 0.29 0.33 0.31 0.37 0.40 -7% -13%Previous EPS 0.88 2.10 0.10 0.17 0.26 0.36 0.44 0.47 0.57 0.62
Consensus EPS 0.88 1.62 0.26 0.34 0.37 0.37 0.46 0.51 Consensus EPS-High 0.98 1.96 0.30 0.40 0.43 0.42 0.54 0.60 Consensus EPS-Low 0.80 1.04 0.25 0.19 0.32 0.30 0.39 0.48
Key Energy Services EPS 1.29 (0.46) (0.17) 1.00 1.67 0.09 0.23 0.30 0.38 0.40 0.42 0.42 0.43 2% -5%Previous EPS 1.00 1.83 0.09 0.23 0.30 0.38 0.40 0.44 0.48 0.51
Consensus EPS 0.98 1.75 0.31 0.35 0.37 0.43 0.47 0.45 Consensus EPS-High 1.07 1.98 0.34 0.44 0.44 0.49 0.54 0.52 Consensus EPS-Low 0.90 1.33 0.27 0.28 0.30 0.34 0.37 0.32
National Oilwell Varco EPS 5.13 3.94 4.08 4.48 5.26 1.00 1.14 1.16 1.19 1.24 1.30 1.34 1.38 -1% -8%Previous EPS 4.50 5.76 1.00 1.14 1.17 1.20 1.28 1.38 1.51 1.59
Consensus EPS 4.51 5.72 1.17 1.20 1.30 1.36 1.48 1.60 Consensus EPS-High 4.66 6.30 1.25 1.34 1.43 1.47 1.63 1.77 Consensus EPS-Low 4.35 5.20 1.09 1.08 1.23 1.22 1.37 1.44
Cameron International EPS 2.64 2.35 2.41 2.66 3.79 0.49 0.66 0.71 0.80 0.90 0.93 0.96 1.00 -1% 1%Previous EPS 2.66 3.91 0.49 0.66 0.71 0.80 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.06
Consensus EPS 2.69 3.76 0.74 0.81 0.83 0.90 0.97 1.05 Consensus EPS-High 2.86 4.10 0.78 0.92 0.94 1.01 1.06 1.19 Consensus EPS-Low 2.60 3.50 0.71 0.74 0.68 0.80 0.86 0.94
FMC Technologies EPS 2.94 2.93 3.06 1.70 2.37 0.32 0.39 0.48 0.52 0.55 0.58 0.61 0.63 -1% 4%Consensus EPS 1.71 2.28 0.46 0.54 0.52 0.56 0.59 0.63
Consensus EPS-High 1.80 2.45 0.50 0.60 0.57 0.61 0.64 0.68 Consensus EPS-Low 1.64 2.10 0.41 0.50 0.47 0.53 0.55 0.55
Dril-Quip EPS 2.62 2.75 2.80 2.32 3.90 0.54 0.55 0.58 0.65 0.74 0.90 1.06 1.19 0% 13%Consensus EPS 2.33 3.45 0.58 0.65 0.74 0.82 0.88 0.95
Consensus EPS-High 2.39 4.00 0.67 0.73 0.86 0.93 1.07 1.14 Consensus EPS-Low 2.28 3.05 0.57 0.60 0.68 0.75 0.77 0.83
Transocean EPS 14.40 11.44 6.08 3.24 7.00 0.48 0.65 0.81 1.29 1.39 1.69 1.95 1.97 -4% 20%Consensus EPS 3.36 5.84 0.80 1.33 1.30 1.53 1.52 1.48
Consensus EPS-High 4.82 6.90 1.03 1.60 1.75 1.71 1.77 1.65 Consensus EPS-Low 2.45 4.52 0.55 1.00 1.08 1.35 1.22 1.23
Seadrill EPS 1.05 2.60 2.64 2.63 3.24 0.72 0.41 0.70 0.76 0.73 0.86 0.84 0.81 -8% 2%Previous EPS 2.63 3.36 0.70 0.76 0.85 0.86 0.84 0.81
Consensus EPS 2.85 3.19 0.73 0.77 0.77 0.79 0.80 0.77 Consensus EPS-High 3.33 3.69 0.89 0.87 0.86 0.88 0.89 0.87 Consensus EPS-Low 2.55 2.70 0.62 0.70 0.71 0.74 0.74 0.70
Noble EPS 5.69 6.44 3.09 1.68 4.52 0.16 0.17 0.53 0.82 1.02 1.03 1.18 1.29 0% 15%Previous EPS 1.68 4.52 0.59 0.76 1.03 1.03 1.17 1.29
Consensus EPS 1.67 3.94 0.57 0.76 0.92 0.96 1.01 1.07 Consensus EPS-High 2.00 5.22 0.75 0.92 1.11 1.10 1.13 1.23 Consensus EPS-Low 1.40 3.20 0.44 0.62 0.74 0.74 0.82 0.90
Diamond Offshore EPS 9.96 9.82 6.69 6.29 6.05 1.80 1.92 1.39 1.19 1.09 1.60 1.58 1.78 2% 21%Consensus EPS 6.18 4.99 1.47 1.09 1.15 1.26 1.23 1.29
Consensus EPS-High 6.64 6.14 1.64 1.48 1.46 1.51 1.62 1.57 Consensus EPS-Low 4.44 3.75 1.21 0.87 0.76 0.86 0.93 0.99
Ensco EPS 8.21 5.50 3.80 3.04 5.75 0.46 0.72 0.85 1.17 1.34 1.58 1.67 1.79 -13% -2%Consensus EPS 3.49 5.86 0.87 1.32 1.34 1.42 1.46 1.62
Consensus EPS-High 3.95 6.50 1.07 1.50 1.50 1.52 1.61 1.84 Consensus EPS-Low 3.10 5.35 0.72 1.02 1.10 1.28 1.34 1.41
Rowan EPS 4.06 2.98 2.61 1.80 4.37 0.24 0.38 0.43 0.76 0.92 0.98 1.23 1.24 6% 15%Consensus EPS 1.69 3.79 0.40 0.69 0.87 0.91 0.94 0.95
Consensus EPS-High 2.10 4.40 0.52 0.90 1.14 1.13 1.06 1.25 Consensus EPS-Low 1.25 3.20 0.33 0.50 0.63 0.61 0.65 0.70
Atwood Oceanics EPS 3.25 3.77 4.04 4.02 4.35 1.08 1.15 0.98 0.97 1.02 1.16 1.21 1.48 0% 5%Previous EPS 4.02 4.44 1.08 1.15 0.98 0.97 1.02 1.16 1.29 1.57
Consensus EPS 4.03 4.14 1.02 1.07 0.92 1.04 1.17 1.16 Consensus EPS-High 4.40 4.50 1.25 1.17 1.06 1.44 1.36 1.31 Consensus EPS-Low 3.66 3.69 0.93 0.77 0.80 0.91 0.88 1.06
Hercules Offshore EPS 1.07 (0.68) (0.54) (0.51) (0.15) (0.12) (0.10) (0.11) (0.17) (0.08) (0.03) (0.02) (0.01) na naConsensus EPS (0.56) (0.42) (0.14) (0.19) (0.14) (0.09) (0.09) (0.08)
Consensus EPS-High (0.38) 0.20 (0.06) (0.07) - 0.05 0.07 0.08 Consensus EPS-Low (0.67) (0.74) (0.20) (0.25) (0.24) (0.17) (0.19) (0.19)
Nabors Industries EPS 3.12 1.32 1.18 1.54 2.63 0.29 0.23 0.40 0.61 0.67 0.65 0.66 0.65 5% 8%Previous EPS 1.55 3.00 0.29 0.23 0.41 0.62 0.70 0.73 0.77 0.80
Consensus EPS 1.47 2.45 0.40 0.54 0.60 0.55 0.64 0.69 Consensus EPS-High 1.55 2.90 0.45 0.62 0.69 0.68 0.74 0.79 Consensus EPS-Low 1.37 2.00 0.36 0.48 0.53 0.45 0.52 0.60
Patterson-UTI Energy EPS 2.35 (0.19) 0.69 2.28 2.66 0.46 0.52 0.59 0.71 0.77 0.72 0.63 0.54 -2% -14%Previous EPS 2.28 3.15 0.46 0.52 0.59 0.71 0.76 0.78 0.80 0.81
Consensus EPS 2.32 3.08 0.63 0.70 0.73 0.75 0.83 0.87 Consensus EPS-High 2.39 3.62 0.66 0.75 0.81 0.83 0.96 1.01 Consensus EPS-Low 2.20 2.10 0.59 0.62 0.65 0.65 0.67 0.67
VRP EPS vs Consensus
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
32
Valuation Summary
Note: Curreny in ($ US), unless otherwise indicated
Company Ticker Rating PriceTarget
Price
Shares Out
(MM)Mkt Cap
(MM) EV (MM)2010A 2011E 2012E 2010A 2011E 2012E 2010A 2011E 2012E 2010A 2011E 2012E
Diversified Oilfield SerivicesSchlumberger SLB Buy 63 110 1,349 84,524 89,980 2.85 3.75 5.42 22.0X 16.7X 11.6X 12.1X 8.7X 6.4X 3% 6% 3%Halliburton HAL Buy 33 60 920 30,642 32,786 2.08 3.42 3.94 16.0X 9.7X 8.5X 7.8X 5.2X 4.4X 5% 6% 4%Baker Hughes BHI Buy 49 95 436 21,513 24,492 2.28 4.33 5.42 21.6X 11.4X 9.1X 9.3X 5.4X 4.3X 10% 11% 8%Weatherford WFT Buy 13 27 749 9,814 17,223 0.49 0.82 1.40 26.7X 16.1X 9.3X 8.5X 6.8X 5.2X 39% 43% 44%
21.6X 13.5X 9.6X 9.4X 6.5X 5.1X 14% 17% 15%Mid/Small Cap Oilfield SericesCore Laboratories CLB NR 92 -- 47 4,266 4,292 3.04 3.76 4.86 30.1X 24.4X 18.8X 17.2X 14.9X 12.0X na na naRPC RES NR 17 -- 148 2,505 2,617 0.97 2.15 2.59 17.4X 7.8X 6.5X 7.2X 3.8X 3.1X 6% 5% -2%Trican Well Service TCW NR C$16 -- 147 C$2333 2,355 C$1.08 C$2.04 C$2.40 14.7X 7.8X 6.6X 7.0X 4.0X 3.2X 0% 5% 4%Carbo Ceramics CRR NR 111 -- 23 2,563 2,516 3.30 5.55 7.36 33.5X 19.9X 15.0X 17.4X 11.0X 8.4X na -3% -9%Complete Production Services CPX NR 20 -- 79 1,616 2,139 1.13 2.87 4.13 18.1X 7.1X 4.9X 5.6X 3.4X 2.6X 25% 24% 21%Key Energy Services KEG Hold 10 16 151 1,468 1,875 (0.17) 1.00 1.67 na 9.7X 5.8X 13.1X 11.2X 9.1X 20% 20% 11%Superior Energy Services SPN NR 27 -- 80 2,188 3,004 1.55 2.10 3.09 17.7X 13.1X 8.9X 6.6X 5.2X 4.0X na na naCalfrac Well Services CFW NR C$26 -- 44 C$1125 1,361 C$1.45 C$3.74 C$4.42 17.7X 6.9X 5.8X 7.0X 3.8X 3.0X 16% 24% 18%Tetra Technologies TTI NR 8 -- 77 588 828 0.54 0.58 0.78 14.0X 13.0X 9.8X 3.4X 4.2X 4.2X na 12% 5%Basic Energy Services BAS NR 15 -- 42 654 1,105 (1.21) 2.00 2.90 na 7.7X 5.3X 10.1X 3.3X 2.5X 37% 50% 44%Newpark Resources NR NR 6 -- 91 574 666 0.42 0.70 0.87 14.9X 9.0X 7.3X 7.2X 4.5X 3.7X na na na
19.8X 11.5X 8.6X 9.3X 6.3X 5.1X 17% 20% 17%Oilfield Equipment & ManufacturersAker Solutions AKSO NR 54kr -- 274 14,810kr 20,025kr 6.39kr 5.61kr 7.14kr 8.5X 9.6X 7.6X 5.0X 5.5X 5.1X 30% 11% 8%National Oilwell Varco NOV Hold 59 80 424 24,916 21,564 4.08 4.48 5.26 14.4X 13.1X 11.2X 7.3X 6.4X 5.4X -11% -16% -27%Tenaris TS NR 27 -- 590 15,925 16,298 1.83 2.17 2.77 14.7X 12.4X 9.8X 7.9X 6.6X 5.3X -2% -5% -4%Vallourec VK NR 44€ -- 119 5,241€ 5,889€ 3.76€ 3.68€ 5.16€ 11.7X 12.0X 8.5X 6.4X 6.1X 4.8X 5% 13% 11%Cameron International CAM Buy 45 65 245 11,141 10,775 2.41 2.66 3.79 18.8X 17.1X 12.0X 10.2X 9.6X 7.1X -5% -3% -10%FMC Technologies FTI Buy 40 60 240 9,636 10,168 3.06 1.70 2.37 13.1X 23.6X 16.9X 14.6X 14.0X 10.5X 3% 5% 2%Oceaneering OII NR 37 -- 109 4,061 3,816 1.82 2.00 2.51 20.5X 18.7X 14.9X 8.4X 8.1X 6.7X -5% -4% -9%Dresser-Rand DRC NR 45 -- 80 3,624 3,574 1.86 1.96 3.23 24.4X 23.2X 14.1X 11.2X 9.6X 6.6X 0% 17% 12%Gardner Denver GDI Buy 69 105 52 3,603 3,747 3.38 4.30 6.00 20.4X 16.0X 11.5X 11.8X 7.9X 7.1X 3% -15% -29%Oil States International OIS NR 54 -- 51 2,756 3,574 3.26 5.57 6.88 16.5X 9.6X 7.8X 9.4X 5.3X 4.3X 2% 29% 30%Dril-Quip DRQ Buy 54 90 40 2,180 1,909 2.80 2.32 3.90 19.4X 23.5X 13.9X 11.0X 12.7X 8.0X -13% -14% -15%Lufkin Industries LUFK NR 47 -- 30 1,437 1,348 1.49 2.46 4.44 31.7X 19.2X 10.6X 14.7X 9.0X 5.2X na na naRobbins & Myers RBN NR 39 -- 46 1,778 1,563 0.93 2.39 3.02 41.7X 16.3X 12.9X 23.7X 8.2X 6.3X na -15% -26%Rotork ROR NR 16£ -- 87 1,372£ 1,275£ 0.80£ 0.95£ 1.04£ 19.7X 16.8X 15.3X 12.4X 10.7X 9.7X -8% -9% -12%Exterran Holdings EXH NR 9 -- 64 562 2,608 (0.96) (1.66) (0.83) na na na 5.8X 7.0X 5.7X 77% 75% 74%Schoeller-Bleckmann Oilfield SBO NR 55€ -- 16 872€ 922€ 1.85€ 3.13€ 3.63€ 29.5X 17.4X 15.0X 10.9X 7.8X 7.1X 6% 6% 4%
20.5X 17.4X 11.7X 10.3X 8.3X 6.2X 16% 26% 23%Offshore Contract DrillersTransocean RIG Buy 46 98 320 14,868 25,632 6.08 3.24 7.00 7.6X 14.3X 6.6X 5.8X 7.4X 5.2X 34% 42% 39%Seadrill SDRL Buy 29 49 469 13,571 22,605 2.64 2.63 3.24 11.0X 11.0X 8.9X 10.9X 9.4X 8.3X 36% 38% 39%Noble NE Hold 30 47 252 7,461 11,836 3.09 1.68 4.52 9.6X 17.6X 6.5X 8.0X 9.2X 5.4X 25% 36% 36%Diamond Offshore DO Buy 56 100 139 7,774 8,170 6.69 6.29 6.05 8.4X 8.9X 9.2X 4.6X 5.1X 5.1X 5% 5% 0%ENSCO ESV Hold 41 63 230 9,489 13,931 3.80 3.04 5.75 10.8X 13.5X 7.2X 16.5X 10.4X 5.2X -9% 32% 27%Rowan RDC Buy 31 52 127 3,950 3,952 2.61 1.80 4.37 11.9X 17.2X 7.1X 6.4X 9.0X 4.8X 16% 0% -9%Atwood Oceanics ATW Hold 36 52 65 2,305 4,243 4.04 4.02 4.35 8.8X 8.8X 8.2X 12.1X 11.6X 10.1X 38% 46% 47%Hercules Offshore HERO Buy 3 8 138 382 1,084 (0.54) (0.51) (0.15) na na na 6.5X 7.0X 4.6X 65% 65% 62%Vantage VTG NR 1 -- 291 352 1,343 (0.07) (0.19) (0.01) na na na 15.5X 7.3X 5.9X 74% 77% 75%
9.7X 13.1X 7.7X 9.6X 8.5X 6.1X 37% 38% 47%Land Contract DrilersNabors Industries NBR Buy 13 29 287 3,858 8,767 1.18 1.54 2.63 11.4X 8.7X 5.1X 6.0X 4.6X 3.1X 48% 56% 63%Patterson-UTI Energy PTEN Hold 17 28 156 2,635 3,094 0.69 2.28 2.66 24.7X 7.4X 6.4X 6.0X 3.1X 2.7X 12% 15% 18%Helmerich & Payne HP NR 42 -- 107 4,494 4,791 2.49 3.93 4.72 16.9X 10.7X 8.9X 6.9X 4.7X 4.0X 7% 1% 2%Unit UNT NR 39 -- 48 1,882 2,043 3.04 4.02 4.83 12.8X 9.7X 8.1X 4.7X 3.5X 3.0X na na na
16.4X 9.1X 7.1X 5.9X 4.0X 3.2X 22% 24% 28%Offshore Supply ChainTidewater TDW NR 43 -- 52 2,237 2,691 4.99 2.43 2.58 8.6X 17.8X 16.7X 6.6X 9.0X 9.3X -2% 18% 26%Seacor Holdings CKH NR 84 -- 22 1,820 2,031 12.23 3.80 na 6.9X 22.1X na na na na na na naBristow Group BRS NR 42 -- 37 1,550 2,148 3.11 3.24 3.93 13.7X 13.1X 10.8X 8.1X 8.0X 8.7X 29% 28% 25%
15.2X 18.8X 17.2X 8.2X 9.7X 7.9X 23% 27% 25%Engineering & ConstructionSaipem SPM NR 27€ -- 441 11,778€ 15,158 1.80€ 2.06€ 2.42€ 14.8X 12.9X 11.0X 8.4X 7.3X 6.4X 22% 21% 17%Technip TEC NR 60€ -- 111 6,642€ 5,332€ 3.73€ 4.20€ 4.91€ 16.1X 14.3X 12.2X 6.9X 6.3X 5.3X -25% -27% -29%Mcdermott MDR NR 14 -- 235 3,274 2,780 1.28 1.17 1.49 10.9X 11.9X 9.3X 5.8X 6.1X 5.0X -26% -25% -34%Petrofac PFC NR 12£ -- 346 4,299£ 3,283£ 1.26£ 1.50£ 1.76£ 9.9X 8.3X 7.1X 5.1X 4.5X 3.8X -41% -32% -37%Amec AMEC NR 8£ -- 332 2,757£ 2,020£ 0.59£ 0.69£ 0.80£ 14.0X 12.0X 10.4X 7.5X 6.4X 5.6X -37% -33% -41%Wood Group WG/ NR 5£ -- 369 1,991£ 2,017£ 0.39£ 0.58£ 0.77£ 13.9X 9.3X 7.0X 4.9X 4.7X 4.0X 11% 1% -8%Helix Energy Solutions HLX NR 13 -- 106 1,423 2,416 0.53 1.47 1.73 25.4X 9.1X 7.8X 5.2X 4.0X 3.7X na 35% 25%Tecnicas Reunidas TRE NR 23 -- 56 1,270 739 2.41 2.58 2.76 9.4X 8.8X 8.2X 4.5X 4.4X 4.2X -99% -94% -125%Global Industries GLBL NR 8 -- 116 918 873 (0.34) (0.59) 0.17 na na 45.8X 119.2X -58.8X 7.2X -1% 15% 14%Cal Dive International DVR NR 2 -- 95 167 307 (0.11) (0.17) 0.39 na na 4.5X 4.7X 6.1X 2.2X 53% 47% 39%
15.0X 12.0X 12.7X 16.8X 6.3X 5.3X 24% 21% 20%SeismicPetroleum Geo-Services PGS NR 57kr -- 218 12,436kr 12,788kr 0.39kr 0.44kr 1.05kr 146.4X 131.0X 54.2X 28.3X 24.2X 18.3X 2% 3% 3%Cie Generale De Geophysique GA NR 14€ -- 152 2,139€ 3,346€ (0.26)€ 0.20€ 1.26€ na 70.8X 11.2X 6.4X 5.3X 4.0X 35% 33% 29%
81.8X 43.1X 15.4X 11.1X 7.6X 5.4X 24% 43% 41%TankersTeekay TK NR 21 -- 72 1,541 7,076 (1.53) (1.63) (0.12) na na na 9.8X 10.8X 9.0X 73% 75% 75%Frontline FRO NR 4 -- 78 343 3,021 1.79 (1.30) (1.09) 2.5X na na 6.0X 12.3X 11.1X 88% 87% 87%Nordic American Tanker NAT NR 13 -- 47 593 651 0.22 (0.74) (0.38) 56.1X na na 8.5X 18.5X 10.4X 6% 20% 17%Overseas Shipholding Group OSG NR 12 -- 30 377 2,089 (3.41) (5.48) (3.25) na na na 17.4X 26.1X 11.3X 82% 84% 84%Teekay Tankers TNK NR 4 -- 48 201 642 0.57 0.29 0.17 7.3X 14.4X 25.1X 9.1X 9.4X 10.1X 60% 61% 60%
22.0X 14.4X 25.1X 10.2X 15.4X 10.4X 62% 66% 65%
EPS P/E EV/EBITDA Net Debt/Cap (Mkt)
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
33
Valuation Summary – Price Targets
Theoretical Target to P/E Ratio to 2012 EPS
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Theoretical Target to P/E Ratio to 2011 EPS
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Theoretical Price Target Ranges, Price Targets, & Current Trading Levels
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Relative Upside to Price Targets
Source: Vertical Research Partners
BETA US 10YR ERP Cost of Year 1 Year 2 Terminal PT P/E 2012Ticker (Adj 2YR) 2.1% 5.0% Equity Growth Growth Growth Ratio EPS TargetBHI 1.37 2.1% 5.0% 8.9% 20.4% 23.2% 3.0% 21.0X 5.42$ = 114$ CAM 1.47 2.1% 5.0% 9.4% 14.5% 13.0% 3.0% 16.8X 3.79$ = 64$ DRQ 1.51 2.1% 5.0% 9.6% 51.9% 26.1% 3.0% 24.1X 3.90$ = 94$ FTI 1.32 2.1% 5.0% 8.7% 25.8% 29.4% 3.0% 24.3X 2.37$ = 58$ HAL 1.55 2.1% 5.0% 9.8% 12.4% 21.3% 3.0% 16.6X 3.94$ = 65$ KEG 1.72 2.1% 5.0% 10.7% 2.3% 1.2% 3.0% 11.0X 1.67$ = 18$ NBR 1.71 2.1% 5.0% 10.6% -4.2% 26.2% 3.0% 13.0X 2.63$ = 34$ NOV 1.52 2.1% 5.0% 9.7% 19.1% 3.5% 3.0% 15.4X 5.26$ = 81$ PTEN 1.47 2.1% 5.0% 9.4% -14.7% 19.9% 3.0% 13.3X 2.66$ = 35$ SLB 1.32 2.1% 5.0% 8.7% 28.2% 16.8% 3.0% 22.4X 5.42$ = 122$ WFT 1.59 2.1% 5.0% 10.0% 36.6% 29.3% 3.0% 20.7X 1.40$ = 29$
BETA US 10YR ERP Cost of Year 1 Year 2 Terminal PT P/E 2011Ticker (Adj 2YR) 2.1% 5.0% Equity Growth Growth Growth Ratio EPS TargetBHI 1.37 2.1% 5.0% 8.9% 25.2% 20.4% 3.0% 21.4X 4.33$ = 93$ CAM 1.47 2.1% 5.0% 9.4% 42.4% 14.5% 3.0% 21.1X 2.66$ = 56$ DRQ 1.51 2.1% 5.0% 9.6% 68.2% 51.9% 3.0% 32.2X 2.32$ = 75$ FTI 1.32 2.1% 5.0% 8.7% 39.1% 25.8% 3.0% 26.1X 1.70$ = 45$ HAL 1.55 2.1% 5.0% 9.8% 15.0% 12.4% 3.0% 15.7X 3.42$ = 54$ KEG 1.72 2.1% 5.0% 10.7% 66.3% 2.3% 3.0% 18.1X 1.00$ = 18$ NBR 1.71 2.1% 5.0% 10.6% 70.9% -4.2% 3.0% 17.6X 1.54$ = 27$ NOV 1.52 2.1% 5.0% 9.7% 17.4% 19.1% 3.0% 17.5X 4.48$ = 78$ PTEN 1.47 2.1% 5.0% 9.4% 16.7% -14.7% 3.0% 13.0X 2.28$ = 30$ SLB 1.32 2.1% 5.0% 8.7% 44.7% 28.2% 3.0% 27.8X 3.75$ = 104$ WFT 1.59 2.1% 5.0% 10.0% 72.1% 36.6% 3.0% 27.6X 0.82$ = 23$
$29 $27
$95
$60
$110
$16
$28
$90
$60 $65
$80
$13 $13
$49
$33
$63
$10 $17
$54
$40 $45
$59
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
NBR WFT BHI HAL SLB KEG PTEN DRQ FTI CAM NOV
Implied P/E Valuation Range Price Target Current Px
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
NBR WFT BHI HAL SLB KEG PTEN DRQ FTI CAM NOV
116% 106%93%
80% 76%64% 65% 65%
50% 43% 36%
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
34
Oil Services Sector Options: Tracking Signs from Implied Volatility
Current Implied Volatility: Two Closest Expirations
Source: Bloomberg Vertical Research Partners
1 Mo. ∆ Current Implied Volatility: Two Closest Expirations
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Historical OSX Implied Volatility (two closest contracts) vs. OSX Index Performance:
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
- 50 100 150S&P 500
AKSOWORCKH
SDRLPFCSBO
DOTECCLBBRSTDW
TRE SMSLBESVGDIGLFOSX
DRCTKNE
SPMFTIOII
NATRIGTS
DRQATWUNTRDCTNKBHI
CAMRBNNOVVK
GGSGIFI
TCWHALCFWPGSOISHOS
HPWFTPTEN
WGLUFK
TTISPNNBRCRRDVR
IOKEGEXHHLX
DWSNRESCPX
HERONR
MDROSGBASGOKFRO
Percent Change 1 -Year (40) (20) - 20 40GIFIGLF
IODVR
RBNS&P 500
GDISDRLSLB
AMECGA
OYOGPHIIRORTGEVTGWG/
AKSOTNK
OIIDRCPFCFTIWGNOVDO
CKHNR
SBOBRSDRQ
NEGGSRDC
WORCAMSPMBHI
TECCPXOSX
HALESVRIG
WFTKEGOIS
HPUNTTS
PGSHLX
TDWATW
TKPTEN
VKBASNBR
DWSNCLB
TTIHERO
TRE SMNATHOS
LUFKTCWRESCRREXHSPNOSGMDRGOKFROCFW
Percent Change 1-Year
050100150200250300350400
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Oct-06
Dec-06
Feb-07
Apr-07
Jun-07
Aug-07
Oct-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Apr-08
Jun-08
Aug-08
Oct-08
Dec-08
Feb-09
Apr-09
Jun-09
Aug-09
Oct-09
Dec-09
Feb-10
Apr-10
Jun-10
Aug-10
Oct-10
Dec-10
Feb-11
Apr-11
Jun-11
Aug-11
OSX
Inde
x
Impl
ied
Vola
tility
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
35
View from Debt Markets
1 Week Bid Spread ∆ to Benchmark
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Oil Services & Equipment Debt Yield Map
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
1 Year Corporate CDS
Source: Vertical Research Partners
1 Month Bid Spread ∆ to Benchmark
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Offshore Contract Drillers Debt Yield Map
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Average Current Yield Relative to S&P Rating
Source: Vertical Research Partners
(100)
(50)
-
50
100
150
200
CFW
202
0O
ffsh.
Grp
201
5W
FT 2
020
Obe
brec
ht 2
021
GLB
L 20
27St
ena
2019
RIG
201
3R
DC
201
7A
KSO
201
4R
IG 2
018
SLB
202
1R
IG 2
020
HA
L 20
19N
E 20
13B
HI 2
018
CA
M 2
018
RIG
201
3D
olph
in 2
019
WFT
201
8N
E 20
41C
AM
202
1H
AL
2021
DO
201
5W
FT 2
013
ESV
2027
SLB
201
6C
AM
201
4H
AL
2096
KEG
201
4SL
B 2
021
BH
I 201
8R
IG 2
027
Sten
a 20
16O
dfje
ll 20
11B
HI 2
013
BH
I 202
4ES
V 20
40C
AM
203
8O
cean
Rig
201
6N
BR
202
0N
E 20
40W
FT 2
037
NE
2016
ESV
2020
WFT
203
6W
FT 2
012
NE
2020
ESV
2016
WFT
201
7ES
V 20
21SL
B 2
013
NO
V 20
15M
aers
k 20
14W
FT 2
017
WFT
201
9N
BR
202
0N
OV
2012
NB
R 2
019
BA
S 20
19R
IG 2
015
WFT
201
6R
IG 2
037
1W
Bid
Spr
ead
to B
ench
mar
k (b
ps)
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
- 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Yiel
d to
Wor
st
Years to MaturityNorth American Drillers Norwegian Drillers
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
WFT CDS USD5Y
HAL CDS USD5Y
BHI CDS USD5Y
CAM CDS USD5Y
DO CDS USD5Y
NE CDS USD5Y
RIG CDS SR5Y
Bas
is P
oint
s
1Y CDS Contracts52 Wk Range Current Bid
(400)
(300)
(200)
(100)
-
100
200
300
GLB
L 20
27A
KSO
201
4St
ena
2017
Sten
a 20
19SL
B 2
013
DO
201
4N
E 20
14N
BR
201
2B
HI 2
013
HA
L 20
96C
AM
201
4N
OV
2012
CFW
202
0SL
B 2
021
HER
O 2
017
DO
201
5O
ffsh.
Grp
201
5W
FT 2
011
PDC
201
8W
FT 2
013
NB
R 2
020
CA
M 2
041
HA
L 20
21W
FT 2
013
DO
203
9N
E 20
15B
HI 2
029
WFT
201
2B
HI 2
040
NE
2021
NE
2020
HA
L 20
18ES
V 20
19H
ERO
203
8St
ena
2020
SLB
201
3SL
B 2
021
Mae
rsk
2014
BH
I 201
8N
E 20
13ES
V 20
16SL
B 2
021
HA
L 20
38W
FT 2
020
RD
C 2
019
NB
R 2
020
KEG
202
1R
IG 2
018
Offs
h. G
rp 2
015
WFT
201
7N
BR
201
9So
nga
2012
Obe
brec
ht 2
021
WFT
203
7W
FT 2
019
WG
201
2W
FT 2
036
RIG
201
5R
IG 2
018
NB
R 2
018
WFT
201
6B
AS
2016
1M
Bid
Spr
ead
to B
ench
mar
k (b
ps)
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
- 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Yiel
d to
Wor
st
Years to Maturity
Internation Levered North American Levered
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BBB- BB+ BB- B-
Aver
age
Cur
rent
Yie
ld
S&P Ratings
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
36
Estimate Revisions
Current Year Estimate Revision, Prev. 4 Wks.
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Current Year Estimate Revisions, Prev. 3 Mos.
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Next Year Estimate Revisions, Previous 4 Wks
Source: Vertical Research Partners
-44.4%-31.4%-31.0%
-27.3%-18.8%
-17.1%-11.6%
-6.5%-5.4%-5.1%
-3.8%-3.8%-3.0%-2.7%-2.6%-2.5%-2.2%-2.0%-1.0%-0.7%-0.6%-0.6%-0.5%-0.2%-0.2%-0.1%-0.1%-0.1%
0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.1%0.3%0.3%0.3%0.4%0.4%0.5%0.5%0.6%0.7%0.9%1.1%1.1%1.5%1.8%2.1%2.9%3.2%3.7%4.2%
5.8%6.1%
-50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10%PGSCKHGIFI
PTENRORUNT
TSDWSN
RESBRNC
HOSSBO
VKGE
WG/ATW
SDRLPFCPDCPKDGDISPNCFW
FTIGLBL
ESVEXHGA
GGSWFTSLBHAL
OYOGGOKSPMCAMBRS
IOHERO
KEGNOV
DOAKSOAMEC
HPNE
GLFDRCBASVTGRIG
CRRUDRLTDWTECNBRCLBTTI
PHIIWOR
BHICPX
NRRBNDVRTCWOISWG
MDR
-85.9%-70.6%
-59.1%-53.5%
-45.7%-44.1%
-37.3%-37.0%-35.6%-34.1%
-29.5%-28.6%-27.6%-26.6%-26.6%
-20.1%-19.9%-19.6%-18.7%-17.4%-14.7%-14.4%-13.9%-12.8%
-6.7%-5.5%-2.8%-2.0%-2.0%-1.8%-1.7%-1.3%
0.2%0.4%0.6%0.9%1.0%1.0%2.0%2.3%2.7%2.7%3.0%3.6%3.9%4.5%5.2%5.5%6.0%6.1%6.5%7.0%7.2%7.7%8.0%8.9%9.0%9.3%9.9%10.0%10.3%10.8%12.2%12.7%12.9%14.5%
18.7%19.9%
37.6%
-100% -50% 0% 50%PGSHLXRORNOVGIFI
PTENCKH
NRSBO
OIIGE
DWSNUNT
SDRLIO
VKAKSO
HOSDRQSLBPHIIWG/PDC
BRNCSPMHALGDIESVGOKBASPKDBHI
NBRSPN
AMECFTI
PFCDVRATWBRS
DOGGS
HEROTCWCRR
NETTI
TGERESCFWTECRIGOIS
KEGGA
CLBGLBLUDRL
RBNEXHTDWWOR
HPVTGWFTDRCMDRCPXTRE
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
UN
TPG
S IO OII
TTI
PDC
DR
CW
FTG
IFI
GG
SO
ISW
G/
RIG
SPM
HO
SPK
DD
WSN
ATW VT
GG
LFC
LBG
LBL
ESV
RES
HER
OEX
HG
DI
TDW
TRE
BH
IC
KH
CPX
CFW G
ATC
W DO TS
SLB
PHII
BA
SB
RS
HA
LR
BN
NR VK TGE
NO
VK
EGPT
EN NE
WO
RD
RQ
SDR
LU
DR
LSP
NN
BR
TEC
FTI
AK
SOC
RR
WG
AM
ECSB
O HP
RO
RB
RN
CG
EG
OK
DVR PF
CM
DR
CA
M
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
37
Trading Analysis
Short Interest Ratio %
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Insider Buy/Sell % of Position in Last 6 months
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Performance Relative to Recent Peak
Source: Vertical Research Partners
0.5%0.7%
1.0%1.2%1.3%1.4%1.4%1.5%1.6%1.6%1.7%1.7%1.8%1.9%2.0%2.0%2.1%2.1%2.2%2.3%2.5%2.5%2.7%2.8%2.8%3.1%3.3%3.3%3.4%3.4%
3.8%3.9%4.0%4.0%4.1%4.2%4.3%4.3%4.6%4.6%4.9%
5.2%5.3%5.4%5.6%5.6%
5.9%6.1%6.2%
6.9%7.0%7.0%7.1%7.2%7.3%
7.7%8.1%8.1%
8.9%9.5%
12.5%13.3%
0% 5% 10% 15%TCW
GLBLMDRRIG
BRNCESVNBR
GEUNTHALBHI
SDRLPTENWFT
TSGDI
CFWCAMCKHSLBRDCDVRGOKNOV
NEOISOII
VTGSPNBASATWCRRWORDRC
HPLUFKHERO
IOKEG
OYOGPDCEXHCPXHLXRESPKDRBNGLFTTI
GIFIWG
HOSGGS
DOFTI
CLBBRSDRQ
UDRLNR
TDWDWSN
-27.1%-24.7%
-23.2%-15.1%
-12.0%-6.7%
-4.2%-3.5%-3.4%-3.3%
-2.0%-1.9%-1.3%-1.3%-1.2%-1.1%-0.3%-0.2%-0.2%-0.1%-0.1%-0.1%0.0%
0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.1%0.1%0.1%0.1%0.2%0.3%0.5%0.5%0.6%0.8%1.0%1.2%1.5%1.9%1.9%2.5%2.7%2.9%3.2%3.2%4.1%4.4%4.6%4.9%5.1%5.9%6.2%7.0%8.1%
10.0%14.8%
16.4%18.0%18.3%
-30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30%CLB
OYOGCPXCRRCAMGLF
HPGDI
GGSFTI
MDRSLBBHI
DWSNRDCCKHRBNUNTDRCPKDWG/TDWHOSTREPHIISBODRQ
DOUDRL
SPMTCW
SDRLCFWNBRPFC
WORKEG
LUFKGA
SPNROR
OIIDVRNOVGIFI
AKSOVK
HLXRESHALWFT
GLBLRIGEXHPGSGOKOISTECGE
ATWWG
BASIO
PTENTTI
HEROPDC
AMECNR
VTG
0%20%40%60%80%
100%
GLB
LD
OD
VRU
DR
LW
OR
EXH
FTI
BR
SW
GG
IFI
TS OII
ATW H
PH
ERO
CR
RD
RQ
GO
KR
OR
CK
HD
WSN
NB
R VK RES
CLB
SBO
WG
/H
LX GA
HO
SPD
CA
MEC
TDW
SDR
LU
NT
GE
RB
NR
IGD
RC
TEC
WFT
SPM
BA
SA
KSO VT
GPK
DLU
FK GD
IR
DC
PGS
SPN
PFC IO
KEG
PTEN ES
VG
LFTR
EN
RB
HI
OIS
CA
MTC
WN
OV
SLB
CPX
HA
LC
FW GG
SM
DR
OYO
G
Buy Hold Sell
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
38
Sector Performance Summary
Weekly Performance
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Year to Date Performance
Source: Bloomberg, Vertical Research Partners
Performance Relative to Recent Peak
Source: Vertical Research Partners
-19.0%-11.4%
-9.6%-8.4%
-5.7%-5.1%-4.9%-4.8%-4.7%
-3.2%-2.6%-2.4%
-1.3%-0.9%-0.1%
0.0%0.4%0.5%0.5%0.9%1.2%1.7%1.8%1.8%1.8%1.9%2.0%2.2%2.2%2.5%2.5%2.6%2.7%3.2%3.3%3.4%3.4%3.5%3.8%4.4%4.5%4.6%4.7%4.9%5.0%5.3%5.3%5.4%5.8%5.9%6.0%6.0%6.7%6.9%7.1%7.4%7.9%8.1%8.4%8.8%9.2%9.4%9.5%
10.5%10.6%
12.1%12.1%
13.7%14.5%14.8%
16.5%16.9%
-30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20%GOK
LUFKEXHDVRTREGGS
AKSOHERO
PGSVTGRIG
PTENTTI
TECBRS
GLBLPHIIPKDSPMDRQ
VKWG/
AMECESVGE
CLBROR
DOWORHLXTDWKEGRDCPDCATW
HPNR
RESPFCGA
SPNCKHCFWSLB
SDRLWG
SBOOIS
UNTOII
HOSTSFTIBHI
TCWWFTCRRCPXGDI
BASHALCAMNBRGLF
DWSNDRCRBN
OYOGUDRL
NOVIO
GIFI
-78.9%-69.1%
-63.3%-55.3%
-52.3%-44.9%-44.0%-42.8%-42.5%-40.4%-38.2%-37.7%-37.1%-35.8%-35.4%-35.0%-33.1%-32.6%-31.0%-30.0%-27.8%-27.6%-27.2%-26.1%-25.1%-25.0%-25.0%-24.4%-22.9%-21.7%-21.7%-21.4%-21.0%-20.4%-19.9%-18.4%-18.2%-17.0%-16.2%-15.9%-15.9%-15.5%-15.3%-14.3%-14.2%-13.7%-13.7%-13.4%-13.2%-12.8%-12.6%-11.2%-10.5%-10.4%
-9.8%-7.7%-6.8%-6.5%-5.0%-4.9%-3.5%
0.1%0.5%1.6%2.3%2.8%
6.6%6.9%8.8%10.6%
14.3%26.4%
32.1%
-100% -50% 0% 50%GOKDVREXHWGTRE
TSVK
NBRWFTVTGGA
AKSOPGS
TTIOYOG
IORIG
MDRCPXDRQ
AMECSPMGGS
UDRLCFWSLBKEG
LUFKESVPFCSPN
PTENTCW
HEROTDWHAL
DWSNCKHOIS
UNTPDCSBO
GESDRL
GIFIBHIDOHP
TECRORNOVRDCBRSCAM
FTIPHIIRESBASATWWG/PKDGDI
WOROIINR
CLBDRCCRRRBNHLX
GLBLHOSGLF
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
GO
KH
ERO
WG
DVR
EXHVTGU
DR
LR
IGTTIW
FTN
BR
GLB
LH
LXG
AIO D
WSN
AK
SOPG
SPD
CTS VK PK
DG
ETR
ED
OG
GS
MD
RB
AS
HO
SPH
IIU
NT
GIFI
PTENK
EGSPNC
PXW
OR
LUFK
BH
IESVTD
WH
PSLBA
TWH
AL
OYO
GG
LFW
G/
TCW
CR
RR
ESO
ISN
RN
OV
RD
CD
RQ
AM
ECC
FWSPMR
BN
BR
SSB
OC
KH
CA
MPFCG
DI
SDR
LTECC
LBFTID
RC
OII
RO
R
Darren Gacicia 203.276.5664 ______________
39
Analyst Certification Vertical Research Partners analyst(s) whose name(s) appears on the front page of this research report hereby certifies that the recommendations and opinions expressed in the research report accurately reflect the research analyst's personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issues discussed herein. Transacting Disclosures Vertical Research Partners is not a broker dealer, so does not trade or carry proprietary positions with firm capital in any covered or other stocks. We have fully flexible payment mechanisms available to our institutional clients, including CSA and CCAs in place with all larger broker dealers and execution-only firms in the US. Employees and partners of Vertical Research Partners LLC may from time to time, own beneficial positions in securities we publish on. Vertical Research Partners' employees and partners are prohibited from transacting in such securities within 48 hours of a change in recommendation. All employee and partner transactions in covered securities are required to be pre-approved and monitored by VRP LLC. Other Disclosures Although the information contained herein has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, the accuracy and completeness of such information and the opinions expressed herein cannot be guaranteed. The information and opinions contained herein are subject to change without notice, and Vertical Research Partners, LLC assumes no responsibility to update or amend any information or opinions contained herein. Copyright 2011 Vertical Research Partners, LLC. All rights reserved. All material presented in this document, unless specifically indicated otherwise, is under copyright to Vertical Research Partners, LLC. None of the material, nor its content, nor any copy of it, may be altered in any way, or transmitted to or distributed to any other party, without the prior express written permission of Vertical Research Partners, LLC. This report is limited for the sole use of clients of Vertical Research Partners, LLC. Authorized users have received an encryption decoder with regulates and monitors the access to Vertical Research Partners content. Any distribution of the content produced by Vertical Research Partners, LLC will violate the understanding of the terms of our relationship. The content of Vertical Research Partners website and reports is provided as general and impersonalized investment information and commentary does not constitute a specific recommendation or solicitation that you should purchase or sell any particular security or investment advisory services. Vertical Research Partners is not responsible for trades executed by subscribers to its content. Third-party data providers make no warranties or representations of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the data they provide and shall not have liability for any damages of any kind relating to such data. Vertical Research Partners, LLC does not provide individually tailored investment advice. Vertical Research Partners’ research has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. The securities/instruments discussed in Vertical Research Partners’ research may not be suitable for all investors. Vertical Research Partners, LLC recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial adviser. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. The securities, instruments or strategies discussed in Vertical Research Partners, LLC reports may not be suitable for all investors.