2016 school profiles office of educational … · 2016 school profiles office of educational...

8
2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational Quality and Accountability 840 Research Parkway. Suite 455. Oklahoma City. OK, 73104 (405)522-5399 Fax: (405) 525-0373 Web: http://w\vw.EdProfiles.info BRIDGE CREEK MIDDLE SCHOOL (6-8) BRIDGE CREEK PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2209 East Sooner Road, Blanchard. OK 720] 0 Telephone: (405) 387-9681 26-1095-505 515 Community Characteristics Socioeconomic Data | School Distnct State Averase Ethnic Makeup Based upon Fail Enrollment: Caucasian 87% 87% 58% Black 1% 1% 9% Asian 0% 0% 2% Hispanic 7% 7% 16% Native American 5% 5% 14% Average Propertv' Valuation per Student (12/2016) $27,332 $49,623 Students Eligible for Free/Reduced Lunch 48% 46% 62% U.S. Census Data (American Communit}' Survej- 20II-2015 S-Year Estimates Unless Otherwise Noted) \ District Population 7.900 7,461 Poverty Rate 7% 17% Unemployment Rate 4% 6% Average Household Income $74,057 $63,890 Single-Parent Families 27% 34% Highest Educational Level for Adults Age 25+ College Degree 14% 24% H.S. Diploma w/o College Degree 76% 63% Less than 12th Grade Education 10% 13% Preparation, Motivation <£ Parental Support | KG-3rd graders receiving reading remediation 17% 39% Average Number of Days Absent per Student 7.8 9.1 9.4 Mobility Rate (Incoming Students) 12% 8% 10% Student Suspension Ratio: (Higher number is belter.) There was 1 suspension (of 10 days or less) for every students 10.0 24.5 13.7 There was 1 suspension (of more than 10 days) for every students 0.0 None 171.4 Parents Attending Parent/Teacher Conference 15% 47% 74% Patrons' Volunteer Hours per Student 0.9 0.9 3.4 Juvenile Offenders Sl Offenses (Office of Juvenile Affairs)* \ One out of every students was charged. (Higher number is better.) 498.0 119.2 Of those charged, each averaged ofiense{s). 2.0 2.2 Of those charged were alleged gang members. 0 0.4 'These statistics are provided as another indicator of the environment in which schools must operate. In most cases the offenses were not committed at 2015-2016 School Educational Process Classroom & Administration Characteristics f School District Total (All Schoolsl ES/MS/JHS Slate Averape Fall Enrollment 299 1,494 386 Students as English Language Learners (ELL) 2.3% 2.2% 8.7% Students in Special Education* 11.7% 12.0% 15.5% Non-Special Ed. Teachers (FTE); Number of Teachers 16.9 80.5 21.3 Average Salary (w/ Fringe) $42,760 $42,002 $44,573 Teachers with Advanced Degree(s) 5.1% 13.9% 23.0% Average Years of Experience 14.0 12.3 12.8 Special Education Teachers (FTE)* 2.1 6.9 2.4 Counselors (Fib) 1.0 3.0 0.7 Other Certified Professional Staff (FTE) 1.0 3.9 1.8 Administrators (F1 b) 1.3 6.0 1.3 'Each school has its own unique characteristics for special education programs. Please contact the school for program specific information. DNA = Data Not Available NA ~ Not Applicable Symbols Used on this Report RM = Revised Methodology FTE = Full Time Equivalent " = Data Protected by Privacy Laws ADM = Average Daily Membership (Average Enrollment) FIR = School/District Failed to Respond with Useable Data

Upload: doanxuyen

Post on 13-Aug-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational … · 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational Quality and Accountability ... SSSSISSXXXXXXXXXXXXXN 67 ... Office of Educational Quality

2 0 1 6 S C H O O L P R O F I L E SOffice of Educational Quality and Accountability840 Research Parkway. Suite 455. Oklahoma City. OK, 73104 (405)522-5399 Fax: (405) 525-0373 Web: http://w\vw.EdProfiles.info

BRIDGE CREEK MIDDLE SCHOOL (6-8)B R I D G E C R E E K P U B L I C S C H O O L S

2209 East Sooner Road, Blanchard. OK 720] 0

Telephone: (405) 387-9681 2 6 - 1 0 9 5 - 5 0 5 5 1 5

Community CharacteristicsSocioeconomic Data | S c h o o l D i s t n c t S t a t e A v e r a s e

Ethnic Makeup Based upon Fail Enrollment:C a u c a s i a n 8 7 % 8 7 % 5 8 %

B l a c k 1 % 1 % 9 %

A s i a n 0 % 0 % 2 %

Hispanic 7 % 7 % 1 6 %

N a t i v e A m e r i c a n 5 % 5 % 1 4 %

Average Propertv' Valuation per Student (12/2016) $27,332 $49,623Students Eligible for Free/Reduced Lunch 4 8 % 4 6 % 6 2 %

U.S. Census Data (American Communit}' Survej- 20II-2015 S-Year Estimates Unless Otherwise Noted) \District Population 7.900 7,461

Poverty Rate 7 % 1 7 %

Unemployment Rate 4 % 6 %

Average Household Income $74,057 $63,890

Single-Parent Families 2 7 % 3 4 %

Highest Educational Level for Adults Age 25+College Degree 1 4 % 2 4 %

H.S. Diploma w/o College Degree 7 6 % 6 3 %

Less than 12 th Grade Educa t ion 1 0 % 1 3 %

Preparation, Motivation <£ Parental Support |KG-3rd graders receiving reading remediation 1 7 % 3 9 %

Average Number of Days Absent per Student 7 . 8 9.1 9 . 4

Mobility Rate (Incoming Students) 1 2 % 8 % 1 0 %

Student Suspension Ratio: (Higher number is belter.)There was 1 suspension (of 10 days or less) for every students 1 0 . 0 2 4 . 5 1 3 . 7

There was 1 suspension (of more than 10 days) for every students 0.0 N o n e 171.4

Parents Attending Parent/Teacher Conference 1 5 % 4 7 % 7 4 %

Patrons' Volunteer Hours per Student 0 . 9 0 . 9 3 . 4

Juvenile Offenders Sl Offenses (Office of Juvenile Affairs)* \One out of every students was charged. (Higher number is better.) 4 9 8 . 0 11 9 . 2

Of those charged, each averaged ofiense{s). 2 . 0 2 . 2

Of those charged were alleged gang members. 0 0 . 4

'These statistics are provided as another indicator of the environment in which schools must operate. In most cases the offenses were n o t c o m m i t t e d a t

2015-2016 School Educat ional Process

Classroom & Administration Characteristics fS c h o o l

D i s t r i c t To t a l

( A l l S c h o o l s l

E S / M S / J H S

S l a t e A v e r a p e

F a l l E n r o l l m e n t 2 9 9 1,494 3 8 6

Students as English Language Learners (ELL) 2 . 3 % 2 . 2 % 8 . 7 %

Students in Special Education* 11 . 7 % 1 2 . 0 % 1 5 . 5 %

Non-Special Ed. Teachers (FTE);N u m b e r o f Te a c h e r s 1 6 . 9 8 0 . 5 2 1 . 3

Average Salary (w/ Fringe) $42,760 $42,002 $44,573Teachers with Advanced Degree(s) 5 . 1 % 1 3 . 9 % 2 3 . 0 %

Average Years of Experience 1 4 . 0 1 2 . 3 1 2 . 8

Special Education Teachers (FTE)* 2.1 6 . 9 2.4

Counselors (Fib) 1.0 3 . 0 0.7

Other Certified Professional Staff (FTE) 1.0 3 . 9 1.8

Administrators (F1 b) 1.3 6 . 0 1.3

'Each school has its own unique characteristics for special education programs. Please contact the school for program specific information.

D N A = D a t a N o t A v a i l a b l e

NA ~ Not Applicable

♦ Symbols Used on this Report ♦RM = Revised Methodology FTE = Full Time Equivalent " = Data Protected by Privacy LawsADM = Average Daily Membership (Average Enrollment) FIR = School/District Failed to Respond with Useable Data

Page 2: 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational … · 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational Quality and Accountability ... SSSSISSXXXXXXXXXXXXXN 67 ... Office of Educational Quality

I am honored to be part of what has been and continues to be a great team at Bridge Creek Middle School. BCMS has an established history of academic excellence resulting from years of hard work. BCMS is blessed with great teachers that relentlessly work with students to get them to learn at the highest levels possible. We have created a culture of high achievement in an atmosphere that is fun and inviting. We understand creating a safe environment that kids yearn to be in is critical to successful learning. We have worked hard to enrich our offerings with quality courses that not only result in high achievement, but also allow our students to learn through the arts. In the past, we have collaborated with the One University Store at OU to take our STEM course to another level. We also started a broadcasting course last year to expose our students to video production and journalism. That class was honored to interview US Congressman Tom Cole as well as many other projects. Choir for all middle school grades was also initiated this year as well as a speech and debate course. As a staff, we are working to create a systematic approach to our success through professional learning communities. This will create a system of success for current and future educators that come to BCMS and ensure that all students learning are successful. BCMS is definitely on the rise!

Kenny Ward Principal Bridge Creek Middle School

Mission Statement Bridge Creek Middle School is dedicated to developing creative, self-sufficient students in a respectful environment. Students are encouraged to establish character and maximize potential in a positive student centered curriculum that ensures learning success for all.

Page 3: 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational … · 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational Quality and Accountability ... SSSSISSXXXXXXXXXXXXXN 67 ... Office of Educational Quality
Page 4: 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational … · 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational Quality and Accountability ... SSSSISSXXXXXXXXXXXXXN 67 ... Office of Educational Quality

BRIDGE CREEK • BRIDGE CREEK MIDDLE SCHOOL 2 6 - 1 0 9 5 - 5 0 5 5 1 5

G r a d e

8

2015-16 Student PevfOTntCUtCe (Regular Education Students, Full Academic Year)

% of Students Scoring Proficient & Above by SubjectT h i s S c h o o l S l a t e A v e r a g e

111

E O I(End-of-

Instruction)

g 1 0 0

I 80' t ^

£ 2 0

s e 0

^ 6 0 —

I 40 .—1 20

„ 1 0 0

J 80* i 6 0

.1 40£ 2 0

7 5

< <

a Q

M a t h Reading1 D N A 1 2 1 1 1 DNA 5 1

7 7

<7

Q

M a t h Reading

g 1 0 0

I 80^ 6 0.1 40E 2 0 !

I0 i

< < <

Q Q C

F i e l d

Te s t

M a t h Reading Social Studies S c i e n c e Writing% Ad*-anced I DNA D N A 4 2 I D N A 1

r ■ 1

B e n c h m a r kM e t *

M a t h

• * 1 I 2 7

Reading

■ 76□ IM a t h Reading

i ^ " 2 0 IGeography4 K I 3 5 " I

V I ( K >

i 80 •—^ 6 0

1" i 2 0

F i e l dTe s t

M a t h Readingto Advanced I 43

Hist /Const/Gov' ' t

" 2 ? I 2 7 IScience Writing

1 9 2 1 1

g t o o

I 80^ 6 0 — 1i 40£ 2 0

a .

S f 0

— — 8 3 —

5 5

< <z Z 7 . Z 7 .

d Q o Q Q

Algebra I English n U.S. History% Advanced OOZIO I DNA I 19~l I DNA I 24*

Biology II D N A I 1 7 I

Algebra 11I D N A I 2 6 I

Geometry English IIIDNA I 22~

s /M o s t s t u d e n t s

wi l l be tested in

H S . S e e H S

Profiles for HSs t u d e n t s ' t e s t

r e s u i t s .

|lj; Students taking Algebra I or higher level math class do not participate in 8th grade math test|2]: Students are exempt from certain EOI tests if they passed qualified alternative assessments.

-♦ Performance Benchmark Symbols (Test results must be available for every subject.) ♦-V (The 'Basic-70' Benchmark) = at least 70% of students scoring "Proficient & Above" in all subjects.

(The 'Advanced-25' Benchmark) = meet the Basic-70 benchmark plus at least 2S% of students scoring "Advanced" in all subjects.

Page 5: 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational … · 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational Quality and Accountability ... SSSSISSXXXXXXXXXXXXXN 67 ... Office of Educational Quality

BRIDGE CREEK • BRIDGE CREEK MIDDLE SCHOOL 2 6 - 1 0 9 5 - 5 0 5 5 1 5

2015-16 Student Performance (AU Students, Full Academic Year)

% of Students Scoring Proflcient and Above by Grade and SubjectThis School rv\1 State Average

r Grad^ests^ \R N S

N V x \ \ \ \ \ \ \ X \ \ \ V \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ V C ^ 6 7I - ■ R N S

4 t h G r a d e Te s t s

w I R N S

I R N S■ '='"''"8 KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxXxXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXxXxxXXXXXXX 685tb Grade Tests | i

R N S

N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ X \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ X \ \ ^ ^ 7 1

N XXX\XXX\XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX\\\\\X\\\\\\\\\\XX 73{ RNSK \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ x \ \ \ ^ ^ ^ 7 0{ RNSK \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ X \ ^ ^ ^ ^ 5 8

Writing j (Held Test)

S o c i a l S t u d i e s

S c i e n c e

6 t h G r a d e Te s t s

M a t h

Read ineSSSSISSX X X X X X X X X X X X X N 6 7

L X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Ns s s o eX X X X X X X X X X X X 6 4

8 9

7 t h G r a d e Te s t s

M a t h v X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X N 6 7

8 1

9 0

tlGradTestf ; (Students taking Algebra l or higher level math class do not participate in 8th grade math test.)mM a t h 9 3

S c i e n c e

Writing (Field Test)

OTest^J i (Students are exempt from certain EOI tests if they passed qualified alternative assessments.)

English II

U S H i s t o r \ '

R N S

k X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X W X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X - ^ 7 7R N S

L \ X X X x \ ^ ^ ^ ^ 6 3' L \ \ W ^ \ \ X x x \ x \ \ x x \ ^ ^ ^ 4 8

A I u „ ! R N S■ '8'=''" " kXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX 72R N S

Geometr)

Enel ish i l l RNSk X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X N 8 2

-♦ Results Not Shown (RNS) for This School ♦-Test results cannot be shown if no students were tested (grade not offered), if test results were not available (no record found), or if circumstances require that results be protectedby federal privac>^ laws.

Page 6: 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational … · 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational Quality and Accountability ... SSSSISSXXXXXXXXXXXXXN 67 ... Office of Educational Quality

2 6 1 0 9 5 5 1 5 2 0 1 6 D i s t r i c t P r o fi l e s Page: I69A

Dis t r i c t :

B R I D G E C R E E K

GRADY County

2209 East Sooner Road

Blanchard , OK 73010-6634

(405) 387- i8S0

Community CharacteristicsCommunity Group: El

U.S. Census Data

American Community Survey (2011-2015 5-Year Estimates):District Population 7,900 7,461Poverty Rate 7 % 1 7 %

Unemployment Rate 4 % 6 %

Average Household Income $74,057 563,890Single-Parent Families 2 7 % 3 4 %

Highest Educational Level for Adults Age 25+College Degree 1 4 % 2 4 %

H.S. Diploma w/o College Degree 7 6 % 6 3 %

Less than I2tl i Crade Education 1 0 % 1 3 %

Preparation, Motivation and Parental Support \ICG-3rd Graders Receiving Reading Remediation 1 7 % 3 9 %

Average Number of Days ^sent per Student 9.1 9,4

Mobility Rate (Incoming Students) 8 % 1 0 %

Suspension to Student Ratio: {Higher number is better. )I suspension (<= 10 days) per students 2 4 , 5 1 3 . 7

I suspension (> 10 days) per students N o n e 171.4

'arents Attending at least 1 Parent/Teacher Conf. 4 7 % 7 4 %

Patrons' Volunteer Hours per Student 0.9 3.4

JuvenilQffender ^ ffenseOJA)One out of every students was charged.Of those charged, each averaged offense(s)-Of those charged, were alleged gang members.

4 9 8 . 0

2.0

0

119.2

2.2

0.4

Symbols Used on this Report:A DM = A verage Daily Membership (A verage Enrollment)FTE = Full Time Equivalenti\A = Not Applicable" = Data Protected by Privacy Laws

FTR = School/District Failed to Respond with Useable DataDNA = Data Not A vailable from Providing AgencyRM = Revised Methodology

D i s t r i c t E d u c a t i o n a l P r o c e s s

Grad Organi don istric ire nroUmen ^

Dis t r i c t StateSocioeconomic Data |Ethnic Makeup Based upon Fall Enrollment:

Caucasian 8 7 % 5 8 %

B l a c k 1 % 9 %

As ian 0 % 2 %

Hispanic 7 % 1 6 %

Nat i ve Amer i can 5 % 1 4 %

Average Property Valuation per ADM (12/2016) $ 2 7 , 3 3 2 549,623Students Eligible for Free/Reduced Lunch 4 6 % 6 2 %

This district offered grades EC-12 in school year 2015-2016. It was comprised of1 Elementary School(s), 1 MS/JHS, and 1 High School(s). The district covered44 square miles, with 34.4 students per square mile.

CommunityD i s t r i c t G r o u p A v g

2 0 1 4 / 2 0 1 5 A v e r a g e E n r o l l m e n t ( A D M ) 1 , 4 9 4 . 9 1 , 4 2 6 . 02 0 1 5 / 2 0 1 6 A v e r a g e E n r o l l m e n t ( A D M ) 1 , 5 1 3 . 0 1 , 4 3 5 . 8Difference from 2014/2015 to 2015/2016

Studen rogram^Students Ident ified as Giffed/TalentedStudents in Special EducationStudents as English Language Learners (ELL)

18.1 (1.2%)

2 0 . 6 %1 2 . 0 %

2 . 2 %

Oassroon eacher ^ rq/essiona uppor FTE ^Non-Special Ed. Teachers:

Number of Teachers

Avg. Salary (w/ Fringe)Teachers w/ Advanced Degree(s)Avg. Years of Experience

Special Educ^on TeachersC o u n s e l o r s

Other Cert ified Professional Staff

80.5

542,00213.9%

12.3

6.93.0

3.9

School & Distria Adminislralion (FTE)

Schoo l & D is t r i c t Admin is t ra to rs

Average Salary per Administrative FTETeachers per Administrator

District Revenues (ALL FUNDS) \

Local & CoimtyStateFederal

6.0

576,79414.6

3 4 . 6 %

5 7 . 1 %8 . 3 %

9.8

14.2%1 4 . 9 %

2 . 2 %

80.7

543,3192 3 . 3 %

1 4 . 4

8.5

3.26.0

7.3

575.91212.2

4 2 . 1 %

4 9 . 0 %8 . 9 %

S t a t e A v e

1,299.4

1,305.46 . 0

1 4 . 2 %1 5 . 6 %

7 . 2 %

72.7

545 ,0172 5 . 5 %

13.1

8 . 63.1

6 . 9

7 . 0

$79,18211.7

4 2 . 1 %4 6 . 3 %

11 . 6 %

District Expenditures (ALL FUNDS)

Ins t r uc t i on

Student Support

Instructional SupportD i s t r i c t A d m i n i s t r a t i o n

Schoo l Admin is t ra t ion

District SupportO t h e rT o t a l

D i s t r i c t

%

5 6 . 2 %

7 . 0 %

2 . 3 %2 . 6 %

1 8 . 9 %

7 . 2 %1 0 0 . 0 %

Debt Service in Addition to Above

S / A D M

53.543

5 4 3 8

5 1 4 8

5161$ 3 6 7

$ 1 , 1 9 25 4 5 2

5 6 , 3 0 05 11

Contmunity Group Avg%

5 6 . 7 %

6 . 4 %

3 . 0 %3 . 0 %

6 . 0 %

1 6 . 9 %

8 . 0 %1 0 0 . 0 %

$ / A D M

$4,086

5461

$2195219

$432

51.214$575

57,206$690

State Average%

5 3 . 7 %

7 . 1 %

3 . 8 %3 . 0 %

5 . 8 %

1 7 . 6 %

9 . 0 %1 0 0 . 0 %

$ / A D M

$ 4 , 2 0 8

5 5 5 5

$298

$ 2 3 4$457

$ 1 , 3 7 5$706

5 7 , 8 3 4$847

Average HS Curriculum (Units Offered in Selected Subject Areas)

Language ArtsD is t r i c t

8 . 0Community Group Avg State Average

8.0

6.2Office of EducationalQuality and Accountability

840 Research Parkway, Suite 455Oklahoma City, OK 73104(405) 522-5399 Fax: (405) 525-0373Web Add ress : www.EdProfi les . i n f o

Science 7 . 0 7 . 0

M a t h 6 . 0 7.6

Social Studies 7 . 0 5 . 7

F i n e A r t s 9 . 0 9.0

Languages (non-English) 2 . 0 2.6

T o t a l 3 9 . 0 4 0 . 8

6.6

5 . 6

6.92.6

3 5 . 9

Page 7: 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational … · 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational Quality and Accountability ... SSSSISSXXXXXXXXXXXXXN 67 ... Office of Educational Quality

2016 District ProfilesStudent Performance ( Rcf iihir Education Students, Full Acudemic Year) D i s t n c i : n i t l D a i C C I t t i I C K

R e a d i n g G e o g r a p h y R e a d i n g H i s t / C o n s t / G o v S c i e n c e

\End-of-Instruction Tests* | (Students are exemptfrom certain EOI tests if they passed quaiified alternative assessments.)

Algebra I English II U.S. History Biology I Algebra II Geometry English ID

Community Group I I State

CommunityGroup Average

9 9 . 1 %

3 . 8 %3.2

5 1 . 8 %

2 1 . 08 0 . 5 %

4 . 2 %

State Average

9 8 . 3 %

7 . 2 %3.1

4 9 . 5 %2 0 . 6

8 0 . 8 %

6 . 0 %

New methodologiesare under development.

Additional High School Performance Measures ||

Senior Graduation Rate (2016 Seniors)4-Year Dropout Rate (Class of 2016)Average GPAof HS Seniors (2016 Seniors)Career-Tech Occupationally-Specific Program Participation Rate (2016 Seniors)Average ACT Score (Class of 2016)HS Graduates Completing Regents' College-Bound Curriculum (2016 Seniors)Out-of-State College-Going Rate (2016 Seniors)Oklahoma College-Going RateOklahoma College Freshmen taking at least one remedial course

in Math, English, Science, or ReadingOklahoma College Freshmen with GPA 2.0 or Above

Page 8: 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational … · 2016 SCHOOL PROFILES Office of Educational Quality and Accountability ... SSSSISSXXXXXXXXXXXXXN 67 ... Office of Educational Quality