27 june 2000iain/ion meeting1 practical implementation considerations in the detection of gps...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 1
Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure
A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ SystemsDennis Akos, Sam Pullen, Eric Phelts and Per
Enge Stanford University
![Page 2: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 2
Topics Paper Objective Satellite Failure Threat Models Airborne Receiver Design Constraints Detection Metric Definitions/Implementation Detection Metric Performance Requirements Detection Metric Performance Some Simulation Results Noise/Interference Considerations Scan Peak Requirements Summary & Conclusions
![Page 3: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 3
Paper Objectives Provide summary and update of SQM
requirements Present practical implementation of
SQM detection metrics Reason why detection is not as complex as
it may seem Provide an update on metric
performance Justification for changes to airborne
receiver requirements
![Page 4: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 4
Satellite Failure Thread Models
![Page 5: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 5
Undistorted Correlation Function
![Page 6: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 6
Distorted Correlation Function
![Page 7: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 7
Satellite Failure Threat Models
Threat ALead/Lag
-0.12 chips 0.12 chips
Threat BRinging
4 MHz fd 17 MHz
0.8 8.8
Threat CCombination
-0.12 chips 0.12 chips4 MHz fd 17 MHz
0.8 8.8
![Page 8: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 8
Threat Model A
![Page 9: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 9
Threat Model B
![Page 10: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 10
Threat Model C
![Page 11: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 11
Airborne Receiver Design Constraints
![Page 12: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 12
Airborne E-L Discriminator Constraint Space
Region
3 dB Precorrelation
bandwidth (MHz)
AverageCorrelator
Spacing (Chips)
Instantaneous Correlator
Spacing (Chips)
Differential Group Delay
(nsec)
1 2 < BW 7 0.045 - 1.1 0.04 - 1.2 600
2 7 < BW 16 0.045 - 0.21 0.04 - 0.235 150
3 16 < BW 20 0.045 - 0.12 0.04 - 0.15 150
4 20 < BW 24 0.08 – 0.12 0.07 – 0.13 150
![Page 13: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 13
Airborne Discriminator Constraint Space
Region 3 dB Precorrelation
bandwidth (MHz)
AverageCorrelator
Spacing (Chips)
Instantaneous Correlator
Spacing (Chips)
Differential Group Delay
(nsec)
1 2 < BW 7 0.045 – 0.6 0.04 – 0.65 600
2 7 < BW 14 0.045 - 0.24 0.04 - 0.26 150
3 14 < BW 16 0.07 - 0.24 0.06 - 0.26 150
![Page 14: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 14
SQM Detection Metric Definitions/Implementation
Don’t require pseudoranges Don’t need a “picket fence”
![Page 15: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 15
Close-in Correlation Function Values
P0.1
L0.075(E - L)0.1E0.075
E0.025
E0.1
L0.025
L0.1
![Page 16: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 16
SQM2b Test Metrics0.2, , 0.1, ,
0.2,0.1,
0.2, , 0.1, ,
0.075, , 0.075, , 0.1, ,
0.15,0.1,
0.2, , 0.1, ,
0.075,
1, , 0.2, , 0.1, ,
2, , 0.15, , 0.1, ,
1, ,
2 2
2 2
k j k j
j
k j k j
k j k j k j
j
k j k j
E L E L
SFD k j E k j k jP P
E L E L
SFD k j E k j k jP P
E
P k j
I IE
I I
I I IE
I I
IS
,
1,
0.2, ,
0.075,
2,
0.2,
2,
k j
P j
k j
k
P j
k
SP
L
P k SP
I
IS
I
• Can use more ratios
![Page 17: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 17
Detection Thresholds, Mean Values, MDEs and MDRs
Real World Thresholds, Mean Values
Used for Simulations (Include missed detection probability)
,D ffd D testT K
,R ffd R testT K
,MDE ( )ffd md D testK K
,MDR ( )ffd md R testK K
,, D test DD test T
,, R test RR test T
![Page 18: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 18
Fault-Free Probability Densities
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
-16.7 -8.35 0 8.35 16.7
Hypothetical Test Value Normalized with test
Pro
bab
ility
De
nsi
ty
Fault-Free
Negative Failure
Positive Failure
Kffd
Kmd
test
![Page 19: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 19
Metric Statistics
Based upon Stanford and NovAtel Roof Tests
Two environmental extremes Multipath dominates noise and interference
![Page 20: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 20
Difference Metric Performance Comparisons
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation Angle
De
lta
Sig
ma
Va
lue
- m
ete
rs
0.15 - 0.1, NovAtel 502
0.2 - 0.1, NovAtel 502
0.2 - 0.1 Stanford
0.15 - 0.1 Stanford
![Page 21: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 21
Ratio Metric Performance Comparisons
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
0.003
0.0035
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation Angle
Ra
tio
Sig
ma
Va
lue
Ratio +0.1, NovAtel 502Ratio -0.1, NovAtel 502Stanford Ratio -0.1Stanford Ratio +0.1
![Page 22: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 22
Some Simulation Results Justify simple metric definition Justify change in airborne receiver
design constraints Additional constraints on discriminator
receivers Smaller constraint space
Reduction of constraints on E – L discriminator receivers
Larger constraint space No “Scan Peak” requirement
![Page 23: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 23
Discriminator Error Performance – SQM3
![Page 24: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 24
Discriminator Error Performance – SQM2b
![Page 25: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 25
Threat Model C E-L Discriminator Protection Results
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Test Number (With Multiple Zero Crossings)
Ma
xim
um
Te
st
Va
lue
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
Ch
ip S
pa
cin
g -
ch
ips
, Ba
nd
wid
th -
GH
z
Max
Spacing
BW GHz
![Page 26: 27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d6b5503460f94a4a5e9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
27 June 2000 IAIN/ION Meeting 26
Summary & Conclusions SQM doesn’t have to be exceeding
complex Use correlation function amplitude
measurements instead of PRs Performance is dominated by multipath
Performance varies widely with environment Performance simulations are useful to
define airborne receiver design constraints constraint space E – L scan peak requirement DoD receiver accommodation