3 capacity analysis - 2.ppt
TRANSCRIPT
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 1/24
Transportation Capacity andLevel of Service
CE 426
Weeks 3 –4 Chapter 4
pp. 139-232
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 2/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela2
Objectives
1. Analyze capacity for signalized intersections
2. Identify three types of signal control.3. Define and estimate cycle length and
pedestrian timing.
4. Estimate capacity of transport facility
5. Estimate capacity of pedestrian facilities
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 3/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela3
Intersection Control
Types of Intersection Control – Yield Signs
– Stop Signs
– Multiway Stop Signs
Warrants: – Total intersection approach volume 500 vph for 8 hours, or 350
vph if the 85th percentile speed of the major road is >40 mph
– Combined volumes of vehicles and pedestrians on minor approach200 units per hour for the same 8 hour, and
– Average delay of vehicles on minor street 30 sec/veh during themaximum hour
Intersection Channelization
Traffic Signals
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 4/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela4
Signal Control
MUTCD warrants to signalize an intersection:
1. Eight hour vehicular volume
2. Four hour vehicular volume
3. Peak Hour
4. Pedestrian volume
5. School crossing
6. Coordinated signal system7. Crash experience
8. Roadway Network
What are the types of signal operation at signalized intersection?
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 5/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela5
Three Types of Signal Operation
Pretimed - repeat a preset constant cycle. – does not respond to demand or presence of vehicles or pedestrians.
– suitable in areas with more or less uniform rate of flow.
Semi-actuated – detectors are placed on minor streets only. Themajor street is guaranteed green display except when vehicles aredetected on lightly used minor street. – demand-actuated
– implemented at intersections of a major street and a minor street. .
Fully actuated - detectors are placed on all legs of the intersection. – demand-actuated.
– suitable at intersections with more or less equal demand but fluctuatingflow.
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 6/24
Detectors - autoscope
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela6
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 7/24
Detectors –
loop
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela7
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 8/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela8
Signalized Intersection
Signalized intersections
– permit conflicting traffic movements to proceed efficiently and
safely – Separates individual movements in time rather than in space.
– Movements can be grouped and served during separate phases
– Some movements are allowed to proceed during a phase eventhough they cause conflicts (such as pedestrians allowed to crosswhile right-turn movements are occurring)
Two types of movements – Permitted (conflicts with other movements)
– Protected (without conflicts)
How many conflicting movements occur at an intersection?
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 9/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela9
Signal Timing
Terminologies – pp. 152 – Cycle, Cycle length, interval, phase, offset
Saturation headway, h – average headway that can beachieved by a saturated, stable moving queues of vehicles;around 2-3 sec/veh.
s = 3600/h
s = saturation flow rate (veh/hg/ln)
h = saturation headway (sec/veh)
Capacity of lane (ci)ci = si gi/C
gi = effective green time for lane i
Si = saturation flow rate for lane i
C = cycle length
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 10/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela10
Signal Timing
Maximum critical volume at intersection
C xt N
hV Lc 360036001
Where:
Vc = maximum sum of critical volume
N = number of phases in the cycle
tL = total lost time/phase (includes start-up, and lost time incurred
as light changes from yellow to all red
C = cycle length
Can be used to determine number of lanes, pp. 159
Can be used to determine minimum cycle length, pp. 160
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 11/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela11
Signal Timing
Minimum Cycle Length
Desirable Cycle Length
)/()/3600(1
cv PHF h
V
Nt C
c
Ldes
)/3600(1
min
h
V
Nt C
c
L
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 12/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela12
Signal Timing
Cycle Length – complete sequence of signalindication
Co = optimal cycle length, sec
L = total lost time during a cycle, normally 3.5 secper phase (due to startup delay and clearancelost time)
Yi = sum of the flow ratios (V/S) of criticalmovement i
Yi LC o
1
55.1
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 13/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela13
Saturation Flow Rate
Saturation flow rate – flow rate the lanegroup can carry for continuous green time(g/C = 1)
So = base saturation flow rate = 1900 pcphgpl
N = number of lanes
f = adjustment factors (lane width, heavy vehicle,grade, parking, bus blockage, lane utilization, leftturn, right turn, pedestrian and bicycles)
Rpb Lpb RT LT LU bb p g HV wo F fl f f f f f f f Nf S S
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 14/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela14
Signal Timing
Yellow interval – alerts motorists that green light
is about to change to red – eliminates dilemma zone
Gg a
u
u
LW o
o
2min
Where:
λmin = minimum yellow duration, sec δ= perception-reaction time, sec
(around 1 to 1.5 sec to stop) uo= initial speed, ft/sec
a = constant rate of vehicle deceleration
(around 8 to 11.2 ft/sec2,use 11.2 if not given)
W = width of intersection, ft
L = length of vehicle, ftG = grade
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 15/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela15
Signal Timing
Allocation of Green Times
Gte = total effective green time per cycle
Gei = effective green time for phase i
Actual green time for phase i
xGteY Y Y
Y G i
ei
....21
iitea l GG 11
Gte = C-Sum(Total lost time +All Red)
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 16/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela16
Signal Timing
Pedestrian Consideration
– for WE>10 ft
– for WE≤10 ft where:
– Gp = pedestrian effective green time, sec
– 3.2 = pedestrian start-up time
– L = crosswalk length, ft
– Sp = average speed of pedestrians (usually taken 4 ft/sec)
– WE = width of the crossing, ft
– Nped = number of pedestrians crossing during an interval
E
ped
p p W
N
S
L
G 7.22.3
ped
p
p N S
LG 27.02.3
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 17/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela17
Signal Timing Exercise
A B
Lane Width = 15’
L a n e W i d t h 1 8 f t
500
400
500
600
Given:
saturation flow rate= 2000 vph/ln
(vehicle per hour per lane)
lost time = 3.5 sec per phase
85th percentile speed= 40 mph
Required:
Optimal Cycle length
Phase
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 18/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela18
Bus Capacity
Factors affecting capacity: Dwell time – door opening to
closing
Dwell Time: td = Pata + Pbtb +toc
Pa = alighting passengers (peak 15min)
Ta = alighting time
Pb = boarding (peak 15 min)
Tb = boarding time
Toc = door opening (2 sec) and closing(5 sec) time
Variation of dwell time – standarddeviation (60%; 40-80%)
Clearance time – exit stop toreenter traffic (10 sec)
Failure rate – probability of queuing
Bus stop location nearside
Midblock
farside
Capacity: – Loading Area pp. 177
– Bus Stop pp. 178
– Bus lane pp. 178 Exclusive urban bus lane
Mixed traffic bus lane
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 19/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela19
Transit Person Capacity
Person Capacity, P, person/hr
P = TLPm (PHF) T = veh cap (trains/hr)
L = length of train (ft)
Pm (linear passenger loading level, person/ft PHF = peak hour factor
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 20/24
Transit Quality of Service
Measures pp. 200-202
LOS
– Frequency of service – Hours of service
– Passenger loads
– Route segment reliability
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela20
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 21/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela21
Pedestrian Facilities
LOS p. 206, 208
Walkways and
Sidewalks
– Pedestrian flow rate
Urban Streets pp. 213
E
p
W
vv
15
15
Vp = pedestriam flow rate
V15 = peak 15-min flow rate
We = effective walkway width
j
i
i
T A
d S
L
LS
Sa = ave ped speed, ft/sec
LT = total length of urban street (ft)
Si = ped walking speeddj = intersection delay
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 22/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela22
Bicycle Facilities
Exclusive off-street pp. 215
Shared off-street (peds, skateboards, roller skates)
Paths at signalized intersection
On-street bike lanes
Capacity is not critical for the design and analysis of
bicycle facilities Assume 2000 bicylce/hr/lane for saturation flow rate –
uninterrupted flow condition
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 23/24
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela23
Airport Runway Capacity
Factors affecting capacity pp. 224
– number and layout of runway
– Separation requirements
– Weather conditions
– Wind direction/strength
– Aircraft (heavy, large, small) pp. 86
– Movements (arr-arr, dep-dep, arr-dep, dep-arr) – Air traffic management (ATM) system performance
– Noise and other env considerations
7/27/2019 3 Capacity Analysis - 2.ppt
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-capacity-analysis-2ppt 24/24
LAX Runway Capacity
Capacity Benchmark (2004 data)
– 137-148 flights per hour (arrivals and departures) in
Optimum weather (visual approaches/separation)
– 126-132 flights per hour in Marginal conditions,
– 117-124 flights per hour in IFR conditions
With Planned improvements:
– Optimum and Marginal rates = 173 flights per hour
– IFR condition: 128 flights per hour
10/29/2013 Prepared by: E.M. Parentela24