5 dec 2011_vfinal
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
1/30
PROIECT
DEZVOLTAREA LUNCII DUNARII
FLOODPLA IN REDEVELOPMENT ,
Dol j County, Romania
Suan Tie Pwaproject manager
Joep de Roo
Final seminar December 5th 2011
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
2/30
procedure decision making
long preparation
interests and money
many stakeholders
clear process decision making
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
3/30
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
4/30
problem
exploration
plan
developmenttendering
implementation
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
5/30
spatial plansland owners; purchase and
expropriation
technical feasibiltycost estimatescost benefit analysisenvironmental impact assessmentsocio economic effects
tender documents
MMEDIU (MINISTER/ SECR/ DIR)
ANARMADRCounty councilsInter-ministerial Council for Waters
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
6/30
Benefits
systematic approach
programme & projectmanageble
during project : noarguments about process -focus upon the issues
steps and decisions areclear to everybodyinvolved
transparency betterchance EU fundapplication accepted
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
7/30
Scenario study
Demonstration application procedur
preparation of decision pointchoice of alternatives
Demonstration project approach
WFD National strategy on Flood risk
management
Floodplain Dolj county between
Ghidici and Zavalu
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
8/30
Scenario study objectives
consultation local stakeholders
integrated solutions
wide range of possibilities
Room for river concept
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
9/30
Issues / objectives
1. safety vrs floods
2. flood plains
3. renaturation
(WFD / river basinmanagement plan)
4. agriculture: increase activity
and production level
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
10/30
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
01/01/2006 05/03/2006 07/05/2006 09/07/2006 10/09/2006 12/11/2006
date
discharge[m
3/s]
Dike breach April 14
Drainage-breach on May 3
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
11/30
safety vrs floods (movie)
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
12/30
Scenario 1
Status quo maintained
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
13/30
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
14/30
Advantages:
simple intervention
agricultural area preserved and
better protected
Disadvantages:
no compliance with WFD and River
Basin Management Plan it does notserve one of the objectives
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
15/30
Scenario 2
Floodplain exposed to Danube regimedevelopment of Natura2000 habitats.
Construction of by-pass channelflood risk reduction by giving roomto Danube river
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
16/30
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
17/30
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
18/30
30.0
31.0
32.0
33.0
34.0
35.0
36.0
37.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
distance along Danube [km]
m
ax.waterlevel[ref+m]
Reference no flood
Scenario 2a
Scenario 2b
Calafat Bechet
inflow flood
channel
Project area
Maximum water level along the Danube for 2006, without and withflood channels
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
19/30
-42.0
-36.0
-30.0
-24.0
-18.0
-12.0
-6.0
0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
distance along Danube [km]
differen
ceinmax.waterlevel[cm]
difference scen 2a
difference scen 2b
Calafat Bechet
inflow flood
channel
Project area
Difference in maximum water level along the Danube for 2006, due to the flood
channels
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
20/30
Advantages:
smaller flood risk up to Calafat
WFD / ABA Jiu River Basin Management Plan
most important agricultural area will be preservedNatura 2000 area demarcated and open for floods
opportunities for (eco) toursim and fishing
Disadvantages:
very large scale measures - expensive
loss of some agricultural land
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
21/30
Scenario 3
Renaturation of Floodplaindevelopment of Natura2000 habitats.
Floodplain participates in dischargeflood risk reduction by giving roomto Danube river
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
22/30
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
23/30
30.0
31.0
32.0
33.0
34.0
35.0
36.0
37.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
distance along Danube [km]
ma
x.waterlevel[ref+m]
Reference no flood
Scenario 3
Calafat Bechet
Project area
Maximum water level along the Danube for 2006, without and withinundation of the floodplain
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
24/30
-42.0
-36.0
-30.0
-24.0
-18.0
-12.0
-6.0
0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
distance along Danube [km]
differe
nceinmax.water
level[cm]
difference scen 3
Calafat Bechet
Project area
Difference in maximum water level along the Danube for 2006, due toflooding of the floodplain
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
25/30
Advantages:
WFD / ABA Jiu River Basin Management Plan
Natura 2000 area extended and open for floodssmaller flood risk up to Calafat
Disadvantages:
major loss of agricultural land & farm income
major land purchase / expropriation
drainage of villages - technical issue
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
26/30
Preliminary evaluation scenarios
Scenario 1 2 3
Total cost 24 133 69
Excavated material market value (0) (++) (0)
EffectivenessFlood risk reduction (+) (++) (++)
Value of nature (-) (+) (++)
Side effects / consequencesLoss of agricultural production area (0) (-) (--)
Accelerated commercial crop production (++) (+) (0)
Fishing (0) (+) (+)Navigation (0) (0/-) (0)
(Eco) Tourism (0) (+) (++)
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
27/30
Public participation and
involvement local stakeholders
Set up
stakeholder analyses
workshop (including pre visit)
feedback session
Experiences
much interests in the process and
scenarios
workshop provided basis for scenarios appreciation consultation and feedback
local interest in renaturation and tourism;
more than safety floods and agriculture
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
28/30
Results & conclusions (1)
General
new concepts (in line with EU dir.) step ward approach in complicated issues
Procedure
procedure further acknowledgementRvR Netherlands
structure & outline solid basis for
elaboration
further discussion
R l & l i (2)
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
29/30
Results & conclusions (2)
Scenario study
demonstration of approach, public
participation and integrated solution
room for the river effective measure
elaboration River Basin Management Plan
frontrunner Natura 2000 Management Plan
impact agriculture and land owner ship
large scale measures
order of magnitude of costs
Wh t t?
-
8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal
30/30
What next?