5 th noaa testbeds and proving grounds workshop, april 16-18, 2014
DESCRIPTION
IOOS Coastal and Ocean Modeling Testbed for Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. 5 th NOAA Testbeds and Proving Grounds Workshop, April 16-18, 2014. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
5th NOAA Testbeds and Proving Grounds Workshop, April 16-18, 2014
André van der Westhuysen, Joannes Westerink, Juan Gonzalez, Jane Smith, Jamie Rhome, Jesse Feyen, Cristina Forbes, Julio Morell, Aurelio Mercado,
Jay Veeramony, Hugh Cobb, Carlos Anselmi, Ernesto Morales
IOOS Coastal and Ocean Modeling Testbedfor Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands
1/15
1. Objective2. Activities3. Modeling requirements4. Model selection5. Storm case selection6. First results: Tidal modeling, Wave impacts7. Conclusions
Content
2/15
To extend the present wave/surge operational forecasting capability from mild-sloped coastal areas such as the US East and Gulf of Mexico coasts to steep-sloped
areas such as Caribbean and Pacific islands. Facilitate the transition to NOAA’s National Hurricane Center and local WFOs.
www.nhc.noaa.gov/climo
Objective
www.caricoos.org
3/15
Activities
Phase 1: Model, test case and metric selection• Define desired operational model
requirements.• Identify candidate models to meet these.• Selection and formatting of test cases.• Define metrics for model evaluation.
Phase 2: Comparison over regional field cases• Model evaluations over complex regional
field cases, featuring hurricane meteorological forcing, high-resolution topo/bathy, roughness values from benthic maps and rainfall run-off inputs.
• Performance compared: accuracy vs. cost.
4/15
41115
Rincon, PR
Activities (2)
Phase 3: Model comparison over reef transects• Detailed cross-reef simulations with coupled
spectral wave and hydrodynamic models.
• Results compared with observations and phase-resolving wave models.
Phase 4: Recommendations and dissemination• Compile recommendations on
advantages/disadvantages of various modeling approaches for operations.
• Facilitate the transition to operations at the National Hurricane Center and WFOs.
5/15
Modeling requirements • Guidance requirements set by National Hurricane Program• Guidance needed to determine which evacuation zones to order • Operational requirements:
a) Has to flow through AWIPS in order to be usableb) Time (and timeliness) is critical – order of minutesc) Numerical stability is essentiald) Advisories every 6 h, but more frequent special advisories issued if storms change quickly
• Physics requirements (from COMT1 and otherwise):a) Apply probabilistic approaches before landfall – deterministic only after landfallb) Evacuation zones are typically “chunky” – high-fidelity output lost in operational applicationc) SLOSH: Use a larger model domain, improve parametric wind model and addition of waves
(critical over reefs)d) Unknown impact of resolution and physics over reefse) Importance of submerged reefs in tidesf) Importance of bed friction/percolation
6/15
Model selection
• UND: ADCIRC+SWAN, FUNWAVE• NHC: SLOSH+SWAN• NCEP: ADCIRC+WW3, NWPS• UPR: ADCIRC+SWAN• NRL: Delft3D+SWAN, TRITON
7/15
Marilyn 1995Hugo 1989
George 1998
Lenny 1999
Isaac 2012
Storm selection for regional cases
Sandy 2012 (out of area)
8/15
Cross-reef cases (Rincon, PR)
(1) Datawell Waverider (33 m, 2D wave spectrum)(1) Nortek AWAC (18 m, 2D wave spectrum)(2) Ocean Sensor Systems Pressure Sensor (6.54 m, 3.33 m)(1) Teledyne Sentinel ADCP (10 m channel)
DWR
AWAC ADCP
Press. Sens.
9/15
Tidal modeling: ADCIRC+SWANM
2 C
onst
ituen
tO
1 C
onst
ituen
t
Amplitude Phase
10/15
Tidal amplitudes and phasesM
2 C
onst
ituen
tO
1 C
onst
ituen
t
Amplitude Phase
11/15
M2 Tidal Amplitude Validation
12/15
M2 Tidal Phase Validation
13/15
Wave impacts: SLOSH+SWAN
Surge only Surge + Waves
NWS/NHC/SSUHurricane George (1998), landfall
14/15
Conclusions
1. Testbed to evaluate wave/surge operational modeling in steep-sloped regions such as the Caribbean and Pacific islands.
2. Features regional-scale and nearshore-scale field cases. To conclude with recommendations for operational environment.
3. Broad participation from academic and operational communities, with wide range of surge and wave models.
4. First results: Accurate ADCIRC tidal results through Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands and the Lesser Antilles (not available before).
5. Very localized difference of about -0.02 m with the observed M2 tidal amplitude on shelf between PR and the USVI (interface between (Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea). M2 phases agree well with observed phases, except along PR south coast (but observations questionable).
6. Wave inclusion in SLOSH yields significant water level increase at landfall.
More information: testbed.sura.org
15/15