6.three ply world
TRANSCRIPT
6.Three-ply worldHBT for Pindex
by Jacob Feldman
Two questions after 2PW model
1. Mapping between M-world and P-world - how it works?
2. In “Rule of Layers” we have “facts” and “model” and some “cognition process” as well as in 2PW model. Let’s try to fuse these two models in a new one
There are some special P-objects...
M-Objects
P-Objects S-objects
About S-objects
1. Some P-objects work for us (humans) presumably as a “pointers” or “references” to some other objects or group of objects (as signified). We call such P-objects as S-objects (from “sign” or “symbol”)
2. The signified may be ...
a. One P-object - fact or event
b. Group of P-objects - generalizations
c. One M-object - concept or model
d. Group containing M-objects AND P-objects - meanings
Different kind of sinified entities
M-Objects
P-Objects S-objects
Two kinds of S-objects implementationand how they stay connected
individualimplementation
collective implementation
Conglutination
Usually we consider different S-objects with the same signified entity as one S-object - i.e we conglutinate them
After conglutination the same S-object could have different P-implementations
Now we admit the same S-object being implemented both individually and collectively
Flashbacks
Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914)
Signs, Symbols, Semiotics
Karl Raimund Popper (1902-1994)
Three worlds’ model
The problem of universals is solved nowNominalism
Universals are S-objects
Realism
Universals are M-objects
The End