7. crossmark how to - brazil · • not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the...

37
Managing changes to content

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

Managing changes to content

Page 2: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

Why is it important to update content?

• Readers need to know that they can trust that they can use the research

• Publishers and journals are the authority on this• Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to

maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do

Page 3: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

What’s the problem?

Page 4: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

Updates are shown in different ways

Page 5: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?
Page 6: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

Examples

Page 7: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?
Page 8: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

It’s good to see updates in a consistent way

Page 9: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

On HTML and PDF

Page 10: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

Solution: Crossmark

• An embedded button for HTML and PDF that, when clicked, shows the researcher publication information that a publisher chooses to include• A great way to show users extra or updated information

about the content they’re viewing so that they can trust it• The information stays with the article and can be

accessed even away from the publisher site•Machine-readable metadata available via the Crossref

REST API

Page 11: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?
Page 12: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?
Page 13: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?
Page 14: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?
Page 15: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?
Page 16: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?
Page 17: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

What constitutes a status update?

A change significant enough to affect the crediting or interpretation of the work

Page 18: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

Allowed status update typesaddendum clarification correction corrigendum erratumexpression_of_concern new_edition new_version partial_retraction removalretraction withdrawal

Page 19: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

Crossmark best practices• Comprehensive deposit of metadata

• Proper display of Crossmark button above or close to the

title of the article• Timely deposits of publication updates

Page 20: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

How to get started

Page 21: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

1. Sign up

Sign up - [email protected]

https://www.crossref.org/services/crossmark/

Page 22: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

2. Create a Crossmark Policy Page

• Brief explanation of Crossmark• Links to policies on corrections and retractions• Assign a DOI for persistent linking• Deposit this page with Crossref

Page 23: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?
Page 24: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

3. Deposit Crossmark Metadata

• DOI of the content to which Crossmark button will be added

• DOI of Crossmark policy page

• DOI of content that this deposit is updating

Page 25: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

4. Add Crossref DOI to web and PDF

• HTML metadata<meta name=“dc.identifier” content=“10.5555/12345”>

• PDFeg. https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.5555/12345678&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2017-01-14

• Crossmark button code needs the DOI to find the metadata

Page 26: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

5. Add Crossmark button to contentOn HTML article landing pages In PDF articles

Page 27: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

<!-- Start Crossmark Snippet v2.0 -->

<script src="https://crossmark-cdn.crossref.org/widget/v2.0/widget.js"></script><a data-target="crossmark"><img src="https://crossmark-cdn.crossref.org/widget/v2.0/logos/crossmark-logo-

rectangle.svg" width="150" /></a>

<!-- End Crossmark Snippet -->

Code for web pages

Page 28: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?
Page 29: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

6. Deposit additional metadata

• Funding data• License information• ORCIDs• Clinical trial numbers• Any additional custom metadata

• Publication history• Similarity Check deposited• etc..

Page 30: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?
Page 31: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?
Page 32: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?
Page 33: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

Current content: 20¢

Backfile content: 2¢

Current Content = published in the past two years and year to date.

Page 34: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

Uptake

• Over 600 publishers depositing Crossmark metadata

• For over 7.5 million DOIs

• Around 1% are updates (so even more important that they’re flagged!)

• Over 2,300 of the updates are retractions

Page 35: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

Benefits

• Lets readers know they can trust the content•Convenient - one place to access information•Works in both HTML and PDF• Easier for researchers to cite the most recent version of content• Free for researchers to click on•More dissemination of your metadata

Page 36: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

Information made available for re-use

Page 37: 7. Crossmark How to - Brazil · • Not bad/negative to update works - it helps to maintain the scholarly record - this is an important job for publishers to do . What’s the problem?

Questions?