a n and r 5 analysis summary &update

19
1 A N and r 5 Analysis Summary &Update Just picked up plots from previous transparencies and my analysis note http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/subsys/pp2pp/ collaborators-files/kin-yip which I’ve expanded since the PWG meeting Talked about some EHI/EHO roman-pot and trigger efficiencies for EVU(-WVD) events Kin Yip Nov. 13, 2010 STAR Collaboration Meeting

Upload: amela-blevins

Post on 03-Jan-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

A N and r 5 Analysis Summary &Update. Just picked up plots from previous transparencies and my analysis note http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/subsys/pp2pp/collaborators-files/kin-yip which I’ve expanded since the PWG meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

1

AN and r5 Analysis Summary &Update

Just picked up plots from previous transparencies and my analysis note

http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/subsys/pp2pp/collaborators-files/kin-yip

which I’ve expanded since the PWG meeting

Talked about some EHI/EHO roman-pot and trigger efficiencies for EVU(-WVD) events

Kin Yip

Nov. 13, 2010 STAR Collaboration Meeting

Page 2: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

2

Selection cuts :

Elastically Triggered (according to the online definitions); valid hit/strip are those with ADC at 5 above the pedestal-per-channel; Cluster with ≤5 valid consecutive hits with a sum of ADC’s higher than

a certain threshold based on the number of strip in the cluster as detailed in Tomek’s note.

W hen the clusters in each RP satisfy the above criteria, I call it a “track”. At least one of the following track pairs : EHI-WHO or EHO-WHI or EVU-WVD or EVD-WVU needs to satisfy the following requirements:

In forming track, at least 1 cluster in A/C or B/D planes in each RP is required;

When there are >1 cluster in 1 plane, use the closest one; Obvious if there is only 1 cluster in plane and none on the other

plane; If more than 1 cluster in one plane and none on the other plane, this

track is vetoed. The difference in the (same) coordinates for the A/C pair and B/D

pair need to be 200 m.

Page 3: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

3

Selection cuts (cont.):

Collinearity: For each run, we histogram x=[x(West) x(East)] and y=[y(West)- y(East)] which are generally centered

at 0 and fit the histogram with a Gaussian to find the rms’ (x and

y). The East-West track pair is kept when [(x/x)2(y/y)

2] 32.

TAC cut: We also make histogram [TAC(East) – TAC(West)], the TAC difference for each East-West pairs and require that each event are within 3 ’s.

We have also made fiducial cuts to get rid of the outliers which may be background events.

To get rid of the “hot” regions, in the middle of the vertical RP’s nearest to the beam center, which has considerably more events than other parts of the same RP, we have rejected the events which fall into these “hot” regions with 3 ’s. These events lie near the ~90. For each run, we determine the extremes of the vertical coordinates of the hotspot manually and do a Gaussian fit to determine its in the horizontal direction which helps define the hotspot.

Page 4: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

4

Collinearity plots for WHO-EHI and WHI-EHO

Page 5: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

5

2D collinearity plot for WHO-EHI :

Page 6: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

6

Horizontal

Page 7: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

7

Vertical

Page 8: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

8

The red curve shows the Gaussian fits done by automatic programming and the blue lines are the 3 ’s boundaries around the hotspot in WVU for the last run

10185023.

An example of finding hotspot range:

Page 9: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

9

-t for all all events … in logarithmic scale

Page 10: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

10

All events :

Page 11: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

11

(Left) Raw asymmetry divided by (Pb+Py) of each store; (Right) False asymmetry.

Combining all runs and all –t bins :

Page 12: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

12

Individual –t bins :

Page 13: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

13

Fitted raw asymmetry divided by (PB+PY) with AN cos()as in the note --- will easily add the 2 runs

Page 14: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

14

Contour plot of the fitted results of r5 (as in the previous fit)

Page 15: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

15

The red curve is the curve of AN’s if we use polpol and the pink curve is the curve of of AN’s if we use polpol.

Page 16: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

16

…. future variation:

47 runs (including a short run without any candidates and 2 new runs which were only recently processed due to its lack of TPC info.)

Not all plots include the last 2 runs (but there should be no real difference) …

I have used alignment info. up to Donika’s resurvey … without any micro-alignment ….

When that’s finalized, I can put in the “correction” and redo everything again.

Page 17: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

17

Efficiencies (suggested by JH) :

In each EVU(-WVD) event (satisfying all the cuts) for a run (10183028), in the overlapped regions (EVU overlapping with EHI and EVU overlapping with EHO), I check whether there is a track (which only satisfy some basic requirements such as cluster_length<5 and Energy>Emin_cut) in EHI or EHO in the respective overlapped region.

Inefficiencies: EHI:  (0.30 0.028) %EHO: (0.15 0.017)%

Very efficient !!

Page 18: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

18

Trigger efficiencies:

Similarly, in the same EVU(-WVD) event and in the overlapped regions, I check whether whether EHI or EHO is fired in the respective overlapped region.

Note that the (online) trigger conditions are : EHX1/2: 100 TAC 1700 and ADC 5 and EHX = EHX1 or EHX2

where X = I or O

Inefficiencies: EHI:  (2.86 0.08)%EHO: (3.79 0.08)%

Page 19: A N  and r 5  Analysis Summary &Update

19

ADC’s and TAC’s for EVU-WVD in the overlapped (EVU-EHI and EVU-EHO) region run 10183028 :

• Plot the average if both pass thresholds; • Plot the one that passes the threshold;

• if bad -ve (underflow)