a8 hardiv situmeang

8/12/2019 A8 HARDIV SITUMEANG

1/56

RE EC DEVELOPMENT IN ASEAN COUNTRIESDr. Hardiv H. Situmeang

ASEAN CENTRE FOR ENERGY (ACE)

NEW AND RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENERGY

CONSERVATIONRoad to Energy Security and People Welfare

Indonesia EBTKE Conference and Exhibition 2013

21 August 2013


2/56

Energy Security


3/56

Three Core Dimensions of Energy Sustainability

Energy Security

Social Equity EnvironmentalImpact M itigation

Energy sustainability*) is based on 3 (three) core dimensions:

(1) Energy security, (2) Social equity, and (3) Environmental

impact mitigation. The development of stable, affordable, and

environmentally sensitive energy systems defies simple

solutions. These three goals constitute a trilemma, entailing

complex interwoven links between public and private actors,

governments and regulators, economic factors, national

resources, environmental concerns, and the behaviors of

individuals. It needs firm action to steer the national energy

system onto sustainable energy path in achieving stable,

affordable, and environmentally sensitive energy systems.

Energy Security:For both net energy importers and exporters this includes the effective management of

primary energy supply from domestic and external sources; the reliability of energy infrastructure; andthe ability of participating energy companies to meet current and future demand. For countries that are

net energy exporters, this also relates to an ability to maintain revenues from external sales markets .

Social Equity: This concerns the accessibility and affordability of energy supply across the population.

Environmental Impact Mitigation: This encompasses the achievement of supply and demand-side of

energy efficiencies and the development of energy supply from renewable and other low-carbon

sources.*) WEC Definition. Policies for the future 2011 Assessment of country energy and climate policies, WEC 2011.


4/56

Some Routes to Enhance Energy Security

Cross border transaction: the ability of

the state or of market player, to draw on

foreign resources and products that can

be freely imported through ports or

other transport channels and through

cross boundary energy grids which are

supported by enabling environments

that need to be established.

Adequate national and regional strategic

reserves to address any transient

interruption, shortage, or unpredictable

surge in demand.

Move the energy system towards using

low carbon energy sources, to improve

national energy mix by geographic andfuel supply diversity through government

-industry partnerships.

Attracting large-scale investment in new

low carbon electricity-generation sources

and associated transmission and

distribution networks, together with more

sustainable transport infrastructures

Encouraging the R&D through international

cooperation and collaboration focusing on low-

carbon & carbon-free energy technologies and

taking into account of the role of intellectual

property rights, and to promote demonstration

project in key areas.

Ensuring the security of energy supplies

and the resilience of energy infrastructures

so that energy is both available andaffordable during the transition to low-

carbon energy systems

Deployment of low-carbon & carbon-free

energy technologies, greater role of

renewables (indigenous), promote greaterefficiency in energy production (supply

side) & energy use (demand side), and

provide efficient transmission and

distribution systems.

Some Routes toEnhanceEnergy Security


5/56


6/56


7/56

APAEC 2010 2015

RENEWABLE ENERGY (RE) MIX IN THE PROGRAM AREA 5 OF APAEC 2010 - 2015

During the APAEC 2004-2009, the 10% target to increase the installed RE-based capacities for power generation

was met. As of 2008, the RE installed capacity of the ASEAN region was 37,100 MW (by WEC definition).

The APAEC 2010 2015, Action 1.1 of Program Area 5 stipulated to achieve by 2015, at least 15% based on WEC

definition of RE additional RE installed capacities in power generation mix.

Actions which complement Action 1.1 include: i) the promotion of technical cooperation to complement efforts

on RE targets of ASEAN Member States, ii) the promotion of national RE programs, available market and

feasibility studies to investors, project developers, power utilities and funding institutions and iii) monitoring RE

installed capacity additions bi-annually.

Strategy Action

1. Increasing the development and

utilization of RE sources to

achieve the 15% target share ofRE in ASEAN power generation

mix

1.1 Achieve by 2015, at least 15% based on WEC definition

of RE additional RE installed capacities in power

generation mix

1.2 Promote technical cooperation to complement efforts

on RE targets of the ASEAN Member States1.3 Promote national RE programs, available market and

feasibility studies to investors, project developers,

power utilities and funding institutions

1.4 Monitor RE installed capacity additions bi-annually


8/56

APAEC 2010 2015

Program Area No. 4: Energy Efficiency and ConservationObjective

To strengthen cooperation in Energy Efficiency and Conservation throughinstitutional capacity building and increasing private sector involvement

including enhancing public awareness as well as expanding markets for

energy efficient products.

Strategic Goals To pursue the aspirational goal of reducing regional energy intensity of

at least 8% by 2015 based on 2005 level

To achieve higher end-use energy efficiency for all sectors throughregulatory and market approaches, where appropriate

To enhance institutional and human capacity emphasizing the

development of energy efficiency technology and service providers in the

ASEAN region

To encourage private sector participation, especially financial

institutions to support EE&C investment and implementation


9/56

The 3rdASEAN Energy Outlook


10/56

Primary Energy Consumption from 1990 to 2030 (BAU Scenario)


Total primary energy consumption increased from 252 MOTE in 1990, 339 MTOE in 1995 to 511 MTOE in 2007 or

3.6% per annum. Under BAU, it will growth 4.5% per year from 2007 to reach 1,414 MTOE in 2030. Coal will have

the fastest annual growth as demand increases in power generation, but oil will remain as the major source of

energy.


11/56

Primary Energy Consumption from 1990 to 2030 (APS)


In the APS, the growth of primary energy consumption will be at a slower 3.6% per annum to reach only 1152

MTOE in 2030, 18.5% lower than in the BAU scenario. This is the result of imposing EE&C action plans and saving

targets of the member countries. Primary energy intensity will decrease by 29.7% to 408 TOE/million USD.


12/56

Final Energy Consumption from 1990 to 2030 (BAU Scenario)


Increased at an annual rate of 3.8% from 186 MTOE in 1990, to 241 MTOE in 1995, and to 375 MTOE in 2007. Under

BAU Scenario, Final Energy Consumption in ASEAN will grow at an average annual rate of 4.4% from 375 MTOE to

1,018 MTOE in the period 2007-2030. The transport sector consumption will grow the fastest during the period

with annual growth rate projected at 5.6% driven by the increasing per capita income.


13/56

The 3rdASEAN Energy OutlookCO2EMISSION FROM 1990 TO 2030 (BAU SCENARIO VS APS)

Total CO2emission in the APS will be about 679 million tons of Carbon

equivalent (Mt-C), 24% lower than the BaU scenario (895 Mt-C).

Is there anypossibility tocurb CO2emissions ofthe long-termASEAN energypath?The 4thASEAN EnergyOutlook


14/56

ASEAN will continue to be heavily dependent on fossil fuels especially oil in the

future.

The rapid growth of electricity demand will also be a driving force in increasing use

of fossil fuels especially coal.

One of the most effective ways of meeting future demand is improving energy

efficiency as shown by the APS results. In this regard, ASEAN might to revisit their

energy efficiency programs to optimize the benefits that could be derived from

them.

Another sustainable way to meet increasing demand is to accelerate the

development of clean energy such as renewable and alternative energy.

ASEAN needs to improve the energy investment climate so that it will become

more conducive to investors.

ASEAN should also continue to strengthen regional cooperation especially in

sharing best practices in energy development and utilization including energy

efficiency.


RAISED CONCERNS TO THE ENERGY SECURITY OF ASEANGLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL STABILITY


15/56

FINDING AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS As member countries continue to pursue their economic goals,

primary energy consumption and CO2 emission in ASEAN willincrease almost three folds in the BaU scenario there will beincreasing pressure on energy security and global environmental

stability.

If current energy production levels in the region do not increase -the region will have to source out this additional demand fromoutside the region.

Appropriate energy efficiency and conservation programs, low-carbon technologies and increased shares of non-fossil fuels inpower generation - would be needed to reduce carbon intensityand enhance energy security.



16/56

Mitigation Potential for A Specific Period of Time


17/56

ASEAN Renewable Energy Development

2006-2011


18/56

ASEAN RE Installed Capacity & Generation 2011

Biomass

12.41% Goethermal

7.70%

Solar

0.51%Wind

0.21%Hydro

79.18%

ASEAN RE Installed Capacity

Non-Renewable

70.67%

Biomass

3.64%

Goethermal

2.26%Solar

0.15%

Wind

0.06%

Hydro

23. 22%

Renewable

29.33%

Share of RE in ASEAN Installed Capacity Mix

Non-Renewable

81.08%

Biomass

1.90%Goethermal

2.76%

Solar

0.03%

Wind

0.02%

Hydro

14.21%

Renewable

18.92%

Share of RE in ASEAN Power Generation Mix

Biomass

10.04%Goethermal

14.59%

Solar

0.17%

Wind

0.13%Hydro

75.07%

ASEAN RE Power Generation


19/56

Renewable Energy Support

Mechanisms for Bankable Projects

(Study Report Salient Issues, March 2012)The study investigated various factors that were decisive in privates torsinvestments on grid-connected biomass and solar PV projects inthe 3 ASEAN countries, namely Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines.Around 13 grid-connected projects in these countries were surveyed and11 key factors were discussed with the stakeholders.


20/56

Renewable Energy Policy Supports(Case: 3 ASEAN Member States)

Country Policy Examples

Indonesia

Target

New and Renewable Energy share of 25% in the national energy mix by 2025.

Instruments

Tariffs for Renewable Energy projects with capacity below 10 MW on Small andMedium Scale Power Generation based on grid connectivity and location.

Incentives

The Government borne the VAT of geothermal project during its exploration stage.

Government guarantee for Indonesia State Electricity Corporation (PLN) payments

to power developers on a case-by-case basis.

Philippines

TargetThe National Renewable Energy Program targets an additional RE capacity of almost

10,000 MW by 2030.

Instruments

Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards; Net Metering.

Incentives

Investment production tax credit, VAT exemption, capital subsidy.


21/56

Renewable Energy Policy Supports(Case: 3 ASEAN Member States)

Country Policy Examples (Continued)

Thailand

Target

Increasing the share of RE in total energy consumption to 25% by 2021

InstrumentsFeed-in adder for Very Small Power Producer and Small Power Producer. Feed-

in tariff scheme is being envisaged to replace the feed-in adder.

Incentives

Import duty exemption for equipment related to Renewable Energy

Exemption on corporate income tax (tax holiday) for RE manufacturers.


22/56

Decisive Factors and Instruments

The surveyed respondents particularly the project owners are mostlynational entities whose decisions to invest on specific RE are very much

influenced by their individual conditions and circumstances, theirexposure to the RE resource and technologies, and their perception andassessment of the electricity markets, policy and regulatory frameworks,and financial environment.

Each surveyed respondent have different rankings of the factors that are

conclusive in their decision making process. In addition, stakeholders ofeach country have also disparate investment drivers. Despite theindividuality of each decision criteria, common factors arise becausemany of these are results of government interventions to establishenabling frameworks and stimulate private sector investments.

Renewable Energy Support Mechanisms for Bankable Projects(Study Report, March 2012)


23/56

Decisive Factors and Instruments

Decisive factors common to all countries are the following:

Governmentslong-term commitment to RE power

Reliable and predictable RE policy and regulatory measures

Sound project economics Access to financing

Similar trend can also be observed in the ranking of support mechanisms. The

government support mechanisms are already known but not all of these

mechanisms are relevant to each individual project. The rankings are also

disparate from stakeholder to stakeholder, and from country to country.

Stakeholders from these countries have selected common mechanisms such as

the following:

Price subsidies (feed-in adder, feed-in tariff, favorable off-take tariff)

Fiscal incentives

Low interest loan

Technical assistance in project preparatory stage

Renewable Energy Support Mechanisms for Bankable Projects(Study Report, March 2012)


24/56

Bankable ProjectsThe analysis of survey results reveals key attributes of a bankable biomass and solar PV

projects. Bankable projects are those projects that generate sufficient benefits and attract

bank financing. The survey results bring to light the following attributes:

Well-defined objectives such as catering to the growing electricity markets, addressing the

agro-industrial waste disposal issues and to some extent as a social service through thecompaniescorporate social responsibility (CSR)

Technologies are mature, components and expertise are locally available, and fuel supply

is sustainable.

Capacity building is undertaken and supported internally within the company

Project owners and power off-takers have strong financial standings and highly credit

worthy. In addition to the market and grid access frameworks, key mechanisms are the fiscal

incentives and feed-in tariffs.

Financial mechanisms are important but they are not as important as the incentive

mechanisms.

With the impact of the combination of incentives measures, sound project economics with

financial indicators at par or even higher than other projects in the market.

Renewable Energy Support Mechanisms for Bankable Projects

(Study Report, March 2012)


25/56

ASEAN Guidelines on Renewable Energy Support

Mechanisms for Bankable Projects

(Guideline Report 2013)The Guideline presents effective policy approach and supportmechanisms to trigger private investments in Renewable Energy projectsat each stage of RE market maturation.


26/56

Renewable Energy Market Deployment of ASEAN Countries

Inception stage. Countries at the inception stage of RE market deployment are dependent on fossil fuels to meet their energy demand. Often, fossil

fuels subsidy policies remain from the countrys legacy to stimulate economic development and to ensure affordability of energy for poorer

households. RE exists only as first examples and is deployed as demonstration or pilot projects. The initial formulation of regulations and policy on RE

exists, but is not yet effective to pave the way for RE growth. Moreover, the cost of RE technology is above the cost of competing alternatives. At this

stage, a country is challenged to formulate effective policies, provide stimulus packages and establish institutional capacity required to initiate and

monitor RE market deployment.

Take-off stage. At take-off stage, deployment of RE grows. Awareness of the importance of RE as alternative sources to fossil fuel is increasing,

marked by the enforcement of policies and regulations that promotes RE. Most often in the take off stage, the country faces significant challenge to

establish a predictable long-term support environment to generate investors confidence and appropriate incentives while managing the cost of

promotional policies.

Consolidation Stage. At this stage, the cost of RE technologies achieves a competitive playing field, and there is an important share of RE among the

electricity sources in the country. Deployment grows towards the maximum practicable level, which is close to the realizable potential for the

country.


27/56

Support Mechanisms to Stimulate RE Bankable Projects

SupportMechanism Type Description

Market Mechanism

Feed-in-Tariff (FiT) FiT guarantees the generator of renewable electricity a fixed price per

kWh at which electricity is bought.

Premium-price FiT

(Adder)

Adder provides an FiT payment above the market price for electricity

generation.

Renewable Energy

Portfolio Standard

(RPS)

An RPS requires which requires a minimum percentage of generation

sold or capacity installed be provided by renewable energy. Obligated

utilities are required to ensure that the target is met, either through

their own generation, power purchases from other producers, or

direct sales from third parties to the utilitys consumer.

Net Metering Net metering is a voluntary arrangement where customers are

allowed to sell excess electricity generated from qualified renewable

systems back to the utility through their metered electricity

connection.

Priority Access Under Priority Access utilities are mandated to provide priority grid

connection to RE and/or place electricity from renewable energies at

the top in merit order dispatch.

Competitive bidding In a competitive bidding approach, developers bid for Power PurchaseAgreements (PPAs) from a utility or other contracting authority.


28/56



Equity Investment

Mechanism

State-run or state-funded

Venture Capital

Venture Capital (VC) provides equity funding for

new technology, start up companies, new

business models and takes greater risk and also

seeks greater return from successful projects.

Capital subsidy A one-time grant to fund part of the upfront

capital cost of RE projects.

State investment fund State investment fund is a fund for equity

investment in RE project.

Debt Financing

Mechanism

Mezzanine finance Mezzanine finance refers to a subordinated debt

or preferred equity instrument that is senior

only to equity in terms of fund-providers claim

on companys asset.

Microcredit Microcredit is a funding instrument for small

entrepreneurs who lack access to banks due to

reasons such as high transaction cost.


29/56



Debt Financing

Mechanism

(continued)

Senior debt Senior debt is a long term debt instrument secured against first

charged over the project assets and/or with corporate

guarantee.

Loan softening Loan softening allows government lending institutions to offerloan terms such as longer loan tenor, an interest rate lower than

the market rate, or repayment holidaysover a period.

Tax Code Mechanism

Tax related incentives Tax related incentives are given in a variety of forms such as tax

holiday, reduced tax rate, exemptions, and production tax

credits.

Carbon Tax Carbon tax is a tax levied on emissions from electricity generated

from fossil fuels.

Risk Insurance

Mechanism

Risk Insurance Insurance provides coverage for investors, contractors, exporters

and financial institutions intended to spur private investment in

clean energy.

Sovereign/Policy Risk Insurance

(PRI)

Sovereign policy risk insurance provides insurance to private

investors against sovereign or energy policy risk.

Emission Trading

Mechanism

Renewable Electricity

Certificate

Renewable electricity certificate is an instrument that tracks and

registers renewable electricity production.


30/56

RE Support Mechanisms In Selected ASEAN Countries

S P li G id RE S t M h i


31/56

Some Policy Guides on RE Support Mechanisms

for Bankable Projects

For countries with Inceptionstage RE development:

Formulate an integrated plan for renewable energy

Develop a soft loan assistance program dedicated to RE projects

Provide production subsidy based on generation

Develop focused support scheme for small and of-grid RE projects

Provide technical assistance for capacity building

For countries with Take-offstage RE development:

Structure FiT with precision to achieve policy goals

Implement RPS for bulk electricity suppliers and national utilities

Develop a standard PPA exclusively catering to RE

Establish policy certainty

Establish transparent grid and interconnection rules


32/56

ASEAN Guidelines on Off-grid RuralElectrification Approaches

(Guideline Report 2013)The Guideline presents concrete recommendations for the developmentand implementation of effective, efficient and sustainable ruralelectrification approaches with renewable energy technologies.

B i d Ch ll f RE R l


33/56

DemographicsA large share of the remaining rural households without electricity in ASEAN

countries is located in the poor, remote and isolated areas.

Policy Framework

Most of the ASEAN countries have no specific policy framework for off-grid

rural electrification. Provisions regarding off-grid rural electrification areusually included in the policies and plans for rural electrification in general,

which most often focus on grid extension as the least-cost solution for many

rural areas.

Economics

High levels of initial capital investments and lack of ability or willingness to

pay by rural customers are some of the major issues that make it challenging

to develop a business model for off-grid rural electrification.

Business Models

A large variety of business models for off-grid rural electrification exist in the

ASEAN region, depending largely on local conditions and policy objectives.

Barriers and Challenges of RE Rural

Electrification in ASEAN

B i d Ch ll f RE R l


34/56

Technology and Supply ChainLow quality leads to unreliable electricity supply, low plant load factor

due to regular shut-down for system maintenance, and increase in

operation and maintenance costs over the project life time in many cases

became big barriers for sustainable rural electrification.

Intermittent characteristic and resource availabilityRural electrification technologies usually face strict limitations imposed

by site specificity and seasonality of resources.

Social Acceptance

Local community involvement is an essential aspect in rural

electrification projects. If a project is not well explained, accepted or

appreciated by the community beneficiaries, sustainability can be

hampered.

Capacity on Operation and Business Management

Insufficient capacities on operation and maintenance as well as business

management are among the main reasons that can lead to the project

failure.

Barriers and Challenges of RE Rural

Electrification in ASEAN


35/56

Move Forwards Some Key Elements

Establish a legal framework to encourage the privatesector to get involved in off-grid rural electrification.

Properly set up the electricity tariffs for off-grid rural

electrification.

Avoid providing subsidies where market-based ruralelectrification approaches are feasible.

Allow for long-term agreements between public and

private partners (PPP).

Avoid political interference in selecting business modelfor off-grid rural electrification project.


36/56

Status of EE&C in ASEANMeasures to Promote EE CBarriers & Lessons Learnt


37/56

Status of EE&C in ASEAN

Countries Policy Regulator yFramework

EE CTarget

Major EE CProgramme

Brunei

Darussalam

EE&C Strategic

Plan Draft

(2009)

Energy Efficiency

and Conservation

(EE&C) Act (2012)

Reduce energy

intensity by

25% in 2030

with 2005 as

the base year

Promotion & Public

Awareness

EE&C Standard Labeling

Fuel-efficiency Labeling for

Vehicles (2011)

Cambodia

No specificEE&C policy.

EE&C isincluded in theoverall energypolicy.

UnderPreparation

The overall

reduction of

future energydemand by

20% in 2035

ESMAP WB Projects,

ADEME-ENERTEAM on

EE&C Capacity Building,

ASEAN Energy

Cooperation on EE&C

Energy Auditing : MIME,

UN-ESCAP-ECCJ, UNDP-GEF, JETRO

Participation in ASEAN

EE&C Best Practices for

Energy Efficient Buildings

Participation in PROMEEC

project


38/56


Countries Policy Regulator yFramework

EE CTarget

Major EE CProgramme

Indonesia

2005 (Blueprint of

National EM

2005-25)

1995 (Rev of

National Master

Plan for EC :

RIKEN 2005)

Achievement of

energy elasticity

less than 1 in

2025

National Energy Policy

Presidential

Regulation No.

5/2006

Energy Act No

30/2007

Energy Conservation

Govt Reg No 70/2009

Ministerial Regulation

(MEMR) No. 13/2010

and No.14/2010

The National

Energy

Conservation

Master Plan

(2005); To

decrease energy

intensity by

around 1% per

year on average

until 2020

Awareness &

Information

Energy Audit

Standard and

Labeling

International

Cooperation

LAO PDR

No Specific EE&C

Policy

Currently developing thenational strategy and

policy on EE&C funded

by the ADB and is in the

process of selecting

Consultant

The proposedPolicy is aiming

at reducing

energy

consumption in

Government

Offices by 10%.

Promotion in

Industrial andTransportation Sector

EE&C Standard

Labeling

(households)

ESCO

International

Cooperation.


39/56



40/56


Countries Policy RegulatoryFramework EE C Target Major EE C Programme

Philippines

Energy

Conservation Bill

Energy Conserving

Design Guidelines

for Buildings &

Utility Systems

Demand Side

Management(DSM)

monitoring

compliances of

Industry and

Building

The Energy

Conservation

Law was

approved on

June 1980 with

5 years activity

The draft bill

was extendedon EE under

consultation

affectivity of

the said law up

to 1990

The National

Energy Efficiency

& Conservation

Program (NEECP):

to achieved

energy savings

equivalent to 10%

of the annualfinal energy

demand outlook

from 2009-2030

National Energy Efficiency &

Conservation Program (NEECP)

International Energy Cooperation

(PROMEEC, MTPEC)

Participation in ASEAN Energy

Awards

Singapore

Support adoption

of EE technologiesand measures

Raise awareness

to stimulate EE

Support EE R&D

Develop capability

to drive and

sustain EE

Energy

Conservation Actcame into force

on 22 April 2013

To reduce energy

intensity by 20%(2020) and 30%

(2030) from 2005

level

Domestic Sector: to cut electricity

consumption of household by 10 %dubbed as the 10 % Energy

challenge, Electricity Vending

system (EVS)

Power Sector , Intelligent Energy

System (IES)

Green Mark building Labeling

System Public Sector Energy Audit


41/56


Countries Policy RegulatoryFramework EE CTarget Major EE CProgramme

Thailand

Thailands energy

policy focuses on:

Enhancing

Energy Security

Alternative

Energy asNational Agenda

Promoting

Energy Efficiency

Fair and Stable

Energy Pricing

EnvironmentalProtection

The Energy

Conservation

Promotion Act, B.E.

2535 (1992),

amended to No. 2,

B.E. 2550 (2007) Decree on

commercial and

industrial energy

end-user

Energy Policy and

Planning Office(EPPO): Policy Maker

Department of

Alternative Energy

Development and

Efficiency (DEDE):

Regulator

20 Year

Roadmap on

Energy

Efficiency;

Reduce Energy

Intensity by25% from

2010 to 2030

Industrial and

Commercial Sector

Transportation

Sector

Residential Sector


42/56


Countries Policy RegulatoryFramework

EE CTarget

Major EE CProgramme

Vietnam

Building

Energy Code:

Regulatory

Measure

Energy

Labeling

Voluntary

Measure

Decree No. 102/2003/ND-CP

on Energy Conservation and

Efficiency authorizes Ministry

of Industry and Trade (MOIT)

with responsibilities to

conduct EE and EC programs.

Electricity Law (July, 1 2005)

Specifies Electricity Efficiency

in generation , transmission ,

distribution, and utilization.

Decision No.79 & 80

/2006/QD-TTg: (April 14,2006)

National Energy Efficiency

Program & Electricity saving

program for the period 2006-

2010.

Energy Conservation Law

introduced on 17 June 2010

effective 01 January 2011.

National

Energy

Efficiency

Program

(VNEEP); To

reduce energy

consumption

by 3-5% (2010)

and 5-8%

(2010-2015)

National Energy

Efficiency Program

(20062015)

Two (2) Stages :

Stages 1 (2006-2010):

Actively introducing

and carrying out at

some extent, all

contents of the

Program

Stages 2 (2010-2015):

Developing and

carrying out at large

scale contents of the

Program on the basic

of comments and

lessons on the results

from the stage I


43/56

Measures to Promote EE C


44/56

Measures to Promote EE C


45/56

Barries & Lessons Learned

Lack of Awareness Non-existence or weakness of certain national regulatory frameworks

Poor national response to EC

Limited funding sources

A potential lack of locally manufactured cheaper but energy efficient

equipment A lack of benchmarking information regarding energy performance of

various processes in different industrial sub-sectors

The lack of reliable data available

A centralized EE&C authority

Financial incentives

Limited private sector involvement

Experience sharing, monitoring system and replication programs

Supporting EE&C institutions and sharing of available resources and

expertise

Strong government support for EE&C needed; most EE&C initiatives are

government-driven; EE&C target is vital


46/56


47/56

ASEAN Energy Management Scheme(AEMAS)

AEMAS was designed in 2004-2007 under the framework

and funding of the EC-ASEAN Energy Facility Programme

Subsequently endorsed during the 23rd SOME-AMEM held

on July 2005 in Cambodia

Establishment funded by European Union (1.7 Mil. EURgrant) under the Switch-Asia Programme

Lead Project Beneficiary: ASEAN Centre for Energy

6 other partners acting as Country Coordinator for each

ASEAN Member States + 1 partner handling technicalsupport

10 associates composed of the EE&C-SSN FPs acting as

Steering Committee + UNEP


48/56

AEMAS ENDORSEMENT


49/56

WHAT IS AEMAS

Certification of

energy managers

Certification of

energy end-users

EnergyManagementGold Standard

Training and Certification of

Energy Managers

Training curriculum focusedEXCLUSIVELY on managerial

aspects: how to establish and

manage an Energy Mgtsystem

Two levels of certification:

Certified Energy Mgr and

Professional Energy Mgr

Certification of Companies Complementary with ISO 50001 + additional

requirements

Three levels of certification to progressively

drive towards Energy MgtBest Practices


50/56

AEMAS STRUCTURE


51/56

AEMAS ENERGY MANAGER CERTIFICATIONPROCESS

CERTIFIED ENERGY MANAGER

PROFESSIONAL ENERGY MANAGER


52/56

AEMAS ENERGY END USERS CERTIFICATIONPROCESS

Local Auditors

Energy End

Users

Country

Coordinator

Train and certify

Audit

Audit results review

Country Experts Recommend

Certify

Award


53/56

AEMAS CERTIFICATION UPDATES

AEMASCERTIFIED TARGET AS OF TODAY

Local Trainers 103 127*

Local Auditors 103 63

Energy Managers 3,500 1,188

Energy End Users 2,500 9

Country Experts 12 15*

* Including those certified in Singapore


54/56

Company energy policy

Energy Management system in place and

documented

Trained and certified energy manager

Demonstration of EE improvement

Demonstration of EE measures implementation

Verified improvement of EEI

ISO 50001 AEMAS-EMGS

Budget & procurement policies in favor of EE

Motivation

Energy Management System in

place and documentedReal EE improvement; Energy

Management System is sustainable

AEMAS and ISO 50001


55/56

ASEAN Energy Business Forum 201324-26 September 2013 Westin Hotel Bali Indonesia

Conference Exhibition

Minister-CEO DialogueASEAN Energy Awarding Ceremony


56/56

Thank You

WWW.ASEANENERGY.ORG

a8 hardiv situmeang

Documents