achieving equity in family planning disentangling poverty and place of residence for family planning...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
Achieving Equity in Family PlanningAchieving Equity in Family Planning
Disentangling poverty and place of residence
for family planning strategic planning
Karen G. Fleischman ForeitMEASURE Evaluation PRH
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Equity begins and ends with measurement
Who shows the disparities? How big are the disparities? How do we know that our interventions are
reaching the people with the disparities? How do we know if we have made an impact?
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Who is poor?
Relative poverty• Wealth quintiles, usually derived from
household assets Absolute poverty• Defined against some standard of income
and/or expenditures
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Burkina F
asoGhan
a
Guinea
Liberia M
ali
Mau
ritan
iaNige
r
Nigeria
Senega
l
Sierra
Leone
0
5
10
15
20
25
30 RuralUrban
% U
sing
Mod
ern
FPUrban-rural differences are common
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Burkina F
asoGhan
a
Guinea
Liberia M
ali
Mau
ritan
iaNige
r
Nigeria
Senega
l
Sierra
Leone
0
5
10
15
20
25
30 Bottom quintileTop quintile
% U
sing
Mod
ern
FP…as are differences by wealth quintile
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Bottom 2nd 3rd 4th Top0%
10%
20%
30% Urban Rural
Wealth Quintile
% In
terv
iew
ed w
omen
But residence and wealth go together
Kenya 2003
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Bottom 2nd 3rd 4th Top0%
10%
20%
30% Urban Rural
Wealth Quintile
% In
terv
iew
ed w
omen
…making it hard to interpret differences
Kenya 2003
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Methods
Secondary analysis DHS standard recode files Separate urban and rural strata Rank by wealth score within strata Create residence-specific wealth quintiles Analyze outcome indicators by residence-
specific quintiles
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Wealth and Residence: Ghana 2008
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
Urban
% U
sing
a M
oder
n M
etho
dQ1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
% U
sing
a M
oder
n M
etho
d
National
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Wealth and Residence: Senegal 2005
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q50%
10%
20%
30%
Urban
% U
sing
a M
oder
n M
etho
d
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q50%
10%
20%
30%
% U
sing
a M
oder
n M
etho
d
National
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Wealth and Residence: Zambia 2007
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Urban% U
sing
a M
oder
n M
etho
dQ1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
% U
sing
a M
oder
n M
etho
d
National
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Wealth and Residence: Kenya 2003
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Urban% U
sing
a M
oder
n M
etho
dQ1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
% U
sing
a M
oder
n M
etho
d
National
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Wealth and Residence: Kenya 2008
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Urban% U
sing
a M
oder
n M
etho
dQ1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
% U
sing
a M
oder
n M
etho
d
National
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Limitations of assets-based quintiles
Track over-all trends in family planning outcomes
X Do not match individual consumption measures of poverty
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Bottom 2nd 3rd 4th Top0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
>1 quintile +/- 1 quintile Exact match
Assets-based Quintile
% M
atch
w/
cons
umpti
on
Match-up between consumption and assets measures of poverty
Ecuador 2004 RHS
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Bottom 2nd 3rd 4th Top0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
>1 quintile +/- 1 quintile Exact match
Assets-based Quintile
% M
atch
w/
cons
umpti
on
Match-up between consumption and assets measures of poverty
Ethiopia 2005 DHS2004/5 HIES
Achieving Equity in Family Planning
Conclusions
Disaggregate place of residence and relative poverty to identify pockets of greatest disparities and to assess impact
Use consumption-based measures of poverty to monitor uptake of program interventions by the poor