administrative tools for protecting river flow regimes - robert wigington, the nature conservancy

20
Administrative Tools for Protecting River Flow Regimes Robert Wigington Senior Water Policy Counsel Colorado River Program The Nature Conservancy Managing Rivers for Changing Climes River Management Society April 15, 2014

Upload: rshimoda2014

Post on 14-Apr-2017

428 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Administrative Tools for

Protecting River Flow Regimes

Robert Wigington

Senior Water Policy Counsel

Colorado River Program

The Nature Conservancy

Managing Rivers for Changing Climes

River Management Society

April 15, 2014

Look Mom – No Water Rights

• Re-operating Federal Dams to Comply with the Endangered

Species and National Environmental Policy Acts

• Programmatic Biological Opinions on Water Depletions and

Project Operations in the Upper Colorado River Basin

• Alternatives to Federal Wild & Scenic Determinations on the

Upper Colorado River in Colorado

• Restoring River Flows in the Colorado River Delta in Mexico

through International Agreement

• Improving River Flows through Interstate Water Banking in

the Upper Colorado River Basin

Flaming Gorge Dam

Courtesy of USBR

Getting Orientated:

Upper Colorado River Basin

Re-operating Federal Dams

• The continuing operation of federal dams needs to be

brought into compliance with NEPA and ESA even if the

dams were built before these laws were passed.

• The re-operation of Flaming Gorge dam occurred in a series

of adjustments and flow studies to see what kind of

ecological benefits could be generated by restoring some

aspects of the natural hydrograph.

• This dam re-operation is an example of both an

administrative mechanism to protect river flows and adaptive

management for a large order river.

• The current plan is to add either water right protection under

state water law or flow protection under a federal-state

contract.

Courtesy of NRCS

Grand Valley Roller Dam

Getting Orientated:

Upper Colorado River Basin

Programmatic Biological Opinions

• To avoid triggering consultation under Section 7 of the ESA

on every acre foot of water depletion, state and federal

agencies agreed to protect river flows under state water law.

• When the filings for instream flow water rights were blocked

in state water court, the alternative was to fashion

programmatic biological opinions for major sub-basins that

allowed about the same amount of water depletion.

• These programmatic biological opinions also provided a

framework for coordinating the re-operation of a suite of

federal and non-federal dams to improve flows for

endangered fish recovery, instead of bringing single federal

dams into compliance one at a time.

Recommended Reading on the

Programmatic Biological Opinion for

the 15 Mile Reach of the Colorado River

Silk, N., J. MacDonald, R. Wigington. (2000). Turning

instream flow water rights upside down. Rivers 7(4).

Coel-Juell, L. (2005). The 15 mile reach: Let the fish tell

us. In Brunner, R.D. (Ed.), Adaptive Governance,

Integrating Science, Policy and Decision Making (pp.

47-90). New York: Columbia University Press.

Courtesy of USBR

Green Mountain Dam

Getting Orientated:

Upper Colorado River Basin

Alternatives to Wild & Scenic Determinations

• The BLM and USFS are obligated to assess whether rivers

that flow through federally managed lands have values that

make them suitable for W&S designation.

• These administrative suitability determinations have

generated concern in Colorado about what weight they are

given in any federal permitting along or upstream of

suitable reaches.

• Once W&S values are identified in the early stages of

federal resource management planning, an alternative is

to ask if there are ways to protect these values without a

federal reserved water right, federal permitting restrictions,

or officially deciding whether the reach is suitable for

designation.

Hoover Dam

Morelos Dam

Courtesy of Amy McCoy

Getting Orientated:

Upper Colorado River Basin

Minute 319: Restoring River Flows in the

Colorado River Delta

• Water users and agencies on both sides of the border will

invest in improving the diversion efficiency of the irrigation

system in the Mexicali Valley, allowing a reduction in the

Treaty deliveries to serve the same irrigated acreage in

Mexico.

• The reduced Treaty deliveries are then recognized as

storage credits in Lake Mead that can be built up and be

delivered back to Mexico and past Morelos dam as a

restorative pulse flow.

• Episodic pulse flows (maybe every 5 years) will be

combined with the purchase or lease of irrigation water

rights in Mexico that are converted to a constant (every

year) supply to sustain riparian restoration.

Glen Canyon Dam

Courtesy of Grand Canyon Trust

Getting Orientated:

Upper Colorado River Basin

Interstate Water Banking

• In the 11th hour of the its recent water supply and demand

study for the Colorado River Basin, the USBR added an

innovative water management solution for water banking at

Lake Powell.

• In modeling this kind of solution, the USBR assumed that

water savings from voluntarily curbing new exports and

energy demands and from temporary cut-backs in existing

irrigation would be shepherded across state lines and

stored at Lake Powell to avoid involuntary curtailment of

Upper Basin depletions to satisfy a compact call.

• This concept is theoretical for now and lacks a clear path

for implementation, but could end up protecting or

improving river flows across the Upper Basin.

QUESTIONS

[email protected]

303-541-0335