advanced consulting skills workshop - day 1
TRANSCRIPT
Anoop Mehendale Abantika Dasgupta
Advanced consulting skills workshop
Mu Sigma Proprietary"This document and its attachments are confidential. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material is strictly forbidden"
Chicago, ILBangalore, India
August 2008www.mu-sigma.com
CONFIDENTIALCONFIDENTIAL
Agenda
• Day 1• Objectives, group formation, engagement lifecycle• Spiel on Issue based frame work• Spiel on Starburst• Spiel on Thought leadership• Home Work – Develop hypothesis through Key Questions
• Day 2• Review Home Work• Spiel on storyboarding• Home Work – Initial storyboard
• Day 3• Review Home Work• Spiel on info matrix to facts/findings etc • Home Work – Refined storyboard
• Day 4• Review Home Work• Refine storyboard and help work through problems • HW - final presentation preparation
• Day 5• Final presentations (4*20 mins)• Assessment
Day 1
Objectives
This is a workshop where we will learn working in a structured manner and …
•We practice follow a structured process to solving business problems
•We practice articulating suggestions and advice effectively
•Work through the case study
Groups
Group A Group B Group C Group D
Chandan Panda Manas Agrawal Raghu Adarsh
Rahul SaxenaRicha Bhargava;
Sourav Banerjee Badal Rath
Sanjukta Arthi B Neha agarwalBhanu Kumar Prabhat
Manoj SriPriya Ravindra Reddy Nreependra
When in the engagement lifecycle should you be looking for Starburst opportunities?
Sales/ Business Development
Sales/ Business Development
Verify Scope and Plan
Verify Scope and Plan
Conduct Internal Kick-off
Conduct Internal Kick-off
Conduct Client Kick-off
Conduct Client Kick-off
Start Evaluate / Support CRM
Measure Results
Measure Results
Feed Back Results to
Client
Feed Back Results to
Client
Close
Archive recordsArchive records
Capture Intellectual
Capital
Capture Intellectual
Capital
Conduct Engagement
Review
Conduct Engagement
Review
Execute (Diagnose or Plan )
Refine/Define Hypotheses
Refine/Define Hypotheses
Conduct Information Gathering
Conduct Information Gathering
Synthesize / Analyze
Synthesize / Analyze
Develop Conclusions/ Recommend-
ations
Develop Conclusions/ Recommend-
ations
Deliver Conclusions/ Recommend-
ations
Deliver Conclusions/ Recommend-
ations
Identify Additional OpportunitiesIdentify Additional Opportunities
CommunicationsCommunications
Quality ControlQuality Control
Professional DevelopmentProfessional Development
Knowledge ManagementKnowledge Management
AdministrationAdministration
Execute (Implementation)
Architecture and Planning
Architecture and Planning DevelopmentDevelopment
LaunchLaunch
Initiate Lifecycle
Management
Initiate Lifecycle
Management
Issue-based Framework
The Issue-based Framework is a systematic, top-down approach to problem solving
Context
Client Objective
Engagement Objective
Issue Issue
Hypo Hypo Hypo Hypo
Key? Key? Key? Key?
Information Matrix
Fact Fact Fact Fact Fact Fact
Finding Finding Finding
Conclusion Conclusion
Recommendation
Barrier Barrier Barrier Barrier
This approach creates value for both consultants and their clients
Consultant value
– A better chance of managing scope with the client
– An information gathering plan that maximizes value while minimizing effort
– A better way to manage delegation on the consulting team
– An anchor for the project - anchoring it to the issues, not activities
– A logic flow and audit trail that ties results to engagement objectives
Client value
– A clearer picture of where the consultants are headed
– A better understanding of the scope
– A more “on target” end result
Top-down thinking is only useful when you get the context, client objectives, and perceived barriers right
Context: ABC wants to significantly increase both engagement revenues (20 – 40%) and engagement profitability. They intend to grow both organically and by acquisition.
Client Objective: To leverage newly minted internal consultants and newly acquired outside consultants, ABC is keen to enhance collaboration and knowledge sharing across the entire consulting and services organization.
Barriers:
Getting the client to articulate the barriers can be an exercise in thought leadership: thoughtful questions can make clients “see” their situation more clearly
Questions to uncover potential Barriers:
– What is hindering collaboration and knowledge sharing today?
– What are the biggest challenges you see in reaching a truly collaborative culture?
Although uncovering the barriers should be done at the proposal stage, it is a useful exercise at the beginning of the engagement as well
Barriers: – Massively different cultures in the
acquired company– Massively different cultures
spanning far flung geographies – No common tools, techniques
and approaches– No common training– A counter productive
measurement system
The Client Objective, fine tuned in light of the barriers, leads to a more clearly stated Engagement Objective
Engagement Objective: Identify and prioritize the initiatives needed to improve collaboration across geographies and across practice areas.
A clearly stated Engagement Objective is the launching point for identifying a handful of meaningful issues to be investigated
Engagement Objective: Identify and prioritize the initiatives needed to improve collaboration across geographies and across practice areas.
Issues to be investigated: (stated as topics):
– …– …– …– …
Identifying a handful of meaningful issues to be investigated is an iterative process. Some issues come directly from barriers
Engagement Objective: Identify and prioritize the initiatives needed to improve collaboration across geographies and across practice areas.
Issues to be investigated
(stated as topics):– Tools, techniques, and training– Culture– Incentives and measurements
After identifying issues as topics, the consultant must craft the issues as broad questions
Engagement Objective: Identify and prioritize the initiatives needed to improve collaboration across geographies and across practice areas.
Issues to be investigated: – What tools, techniques and training
need to be in place to foster collaborative work?
– What corporate culture enhancements are necessary to enable collaboration across geographies and practices?
– What incentives or measurements need to be in place to encourage good cross- practice/cross-geography collaborative work?
Issues are the topics we will investigate to satisfy the engagement objective
• The number of issues you identify should be a “handful”
– Necessary and sufficient, MECE– Easily remembered– Seven plus or minus two
• The order in which you list issues implies sequence– Investigate the leftmost issue first– Investigate the rightmost issue last
• Issues should be stated as questions to ensure clarity– Begin by stating them as topics– Then, review the topics with clients– Finally, state refined topics as open questions
Hypothesis
Hypotheses represent our best guesses at what we think or suspect is going on relative to the issues
Issue: What tools, techniques and training need to be in place to foster collaborative work?
Hypotheses:
• Many basic tools, such as directories that list responsibilities and areas of specialization, are readily available to new ABC employees.
• Many collaborative tools are available to all ABC consultants, but lack of training has hindered usage.
Hypotheses can be stated negatively or positively and with different levels of intent depending on what is useful for you or your client
High level, positive– The culture of this firm is perfectly set to enable collaboration
High level, negative– The culture of this firm is toxic to collaboration
Low level, positive– A highly forgiving attitude and a sense of learning by mistakes is dominant in
this firm’s culture and this encourages the sharing of individual’s efforts
Low level, negative– Perfectionism and a highly critical attitude are rewarded in this organization
and these aspects of their culture inhibit the sharing of individual’s efforts
Generating hypothesis is an iterative process; it requires an ability to start with an imperfect set and migrate to a better set using time honored guidelines
So, don’t fall down the …
Relevant – that’s a good thing
Advice – that’s a recommendation, we’re not there yet
Testable – that’s a mandatory thing
Hohum – that’s an unacceptable thing
Obvious – that’s a waste of time
Level – that’s a really tough thing
Enough – but not too many, (MECE) that’s a good thing
You formulate key questions that, when answered, will support or disprove the hypothesis
Hypothesis: Many basic tools, such as directories listing responsibilities and areas of specialization, are readily available to new employees at ABC.
Key Question:• …?
• …?
Hypothesis: Many collaborative tools are available to all ABC consultants, but lack of training has hindered usage.
Key Questions:• …?
• …?
You formulate key questions that, when answered, will support or disprove the hypothesis
Hypothesis: Many basic tools, such as such as directories listing responsibilities and areas of specialization, are readily available to new employees at ABC.
Key Question:• What basic tools that support or encourage
collaboration are available to new employees?
Hypothesis: Many collaborative tools are available to all ABC consultants, but lack of training has hindered usage.
Key Questions:• How many collaborative tools are available to
ABC consultants?
• What % of ABC consultants have the skills to use the collaborative tools?
Thought leadership isn’t about being the smartest kid on the block; it’s about helping others think better
• Thought leaders provide a platform from which others can:– Launch their own thinking– Grasp a new concept– Focus– Break through barriers– Take an idea and go further
• Thought leaders cross hierarchic lines and can equally help:– Clients– Subordinates– Peers– Superiors
A variety of tools, techniques and approaches enable thought leadership
?????????
Analogies
Questions
Models
LateralThinking
Examples
ThoughtLeadership
Starbursts happen every 12 seconds and blow countless billions of bits of energy and matter into the universe, creating romantic summer skies . . .
… while consulting Starbursts leverage successful engagements to create more opportunities to bring value to our clients and revenue to Mu Sigma
• “The engagement team expands the client relationships in all directions: up, down and parallel within the client organization”
• “Identifying additional areas of value and potential opportunities that are spawned from or generated from the initial engagement entry point”
• “Moving from transactional to trusted advisor”• “Finding and focusing on opportunities for the breath
and depth of IMS’s knowledge, experience, services and products”
Objective of Airbus
• ?
Objective of Airbus
• Decide whether to commit to A3XX?
Barriers?