air travel tax surveystopstanstedexpansion.com/documents/mori_air_travel_poll_tables.pdf · gender...

Children in HHHH IncomeRegionSocial ClassAgeGender£30,000£17,500£17,499

andtoandMid-NoYesover£29,999underlandsSouthNorthDEC2C1AB65+55-6445-5435-4425-3415-24FemaleMaleTotal(U)(T)(S)(R)(Q)(P)(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J)(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)

141663440526866861669673855139858751448234829135829227911309202050UnWtd. Total137367745627659363772668750742359152940428932138533132010589922050Wtd. Total

26212390521281141641077687116107886669833841197188385Strongly support (2)19%18%20%19%22%18%23%16%15%20%20%20%22%23%22%21%12%13%19%19%19%

OMMFGHIFGHIDEHMoQ

4071751117517717722418113911117116112279949511677319264582Tend to support (1)30%26%24%27%30%28%31%26%27%26%29%31%30%27%29%25%35%24%30%27%28%

FEE

36419811291151162179221138128173123108757811387101306255562Neither support nor oppose27%29%25%33%26%25%25%32%27%30%29%23%27%26%24%29%26%32%29%26%27%(0)

SROPKLJNR

1649776316993848557527380473534444854103158261Tend to oppose (-1)12%14%17%11%12%15%12%12%11%12%12%15%12%12%11%11%14%17%10%16%13%

SGCBCDS

9446521631603545432135411024303026195585140Strongly oppose (-2)7%7%11%6%5%9%5%7%8%5%6%8%3%8%9%8%8%6%5%9%7%

SSPIIIIICBCIOPS

8138141037304049542424162910152016277742119Don't know/no opinion6%6%3%4%6%5%6%7%11%6%4%3%7%4%5%5%5%9%7%4%6%

SMMMIHCBdJKMS

669298201127305291389288215198286269210145163177154118516452968Support49%44%44%46%51%46%54%42%42%47%48%51%52%50%51%46%47%37%49%46%47%

SPOMEiDIMNOQ

2581431284710015311913010073107121575964747473158243401Oppose19%21%28%17%17%24%16%19%20%17%18%23%14%20%20%19%22%23%15%24%20%

SSPPLIIICBCIJO*

4111557280205139270158115125179147152861001038045357209566Net support30%23%16%29%35%22%37%23%23%30%30%28%38%30%31%27%24%14%34%21%28%

USSPOMMIIIEiCBdIMq*

0.450.360.250.440.540.320.580.340.330.480.460.420.610.460.450.430.290.230.510.330.42Mean scoreSPOIIFGHICBdINqS

1.161.161.291.111.141.221.131.121.171.121.131.211.061.221.231.201.121.111.101.221.16Std. Deviation0.030.050.070.070.050.050.050.050.060.060.050.060.050.070.080.070.070.070.040.040.03Std. Error

Air Travel Tax Survey

Table 1

AT1.To what extent would you support or oppose a policy aimed at slowing down the growth in air travel?Base: All respondents

Proportions/Means: Tested at (5% risk level) - ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTU/BC/DEFGHI/EFGHI/FGHI/GHI/HI/JKLM/KLM/LM/NOP/OP/QRS/RS/TU* small base less than 30

Number of sample points: 195Source: MORI (JN: 27495)Fieldwork dates: 8th - 12th June 2006

Supportslowing growthNewspaper

Air Tax IntroductionFlown in last 12 monthsin air travelVoting IntentionReadershipNoSix toOne toLib

UnwtdintroductionIntroductionNone16+15fiveOpposeSupportOtherUndecidedDemLabourConservativeTabloidBroadsheetTotalTotal(P)(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J)(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)


393191194212822144-3853036719810114685385Strongly support (2)19%19%19%21%19%12%18%-40%21%15%24%18%19%18%23%19%

NJGCBFIJLN

592288294304644224-5823660101162139217115582Tend to support (1)29%28%29%30%15%24%28%-60%25%25%35%30%27%26%31%28%

JGFFIJ

566289273287451212--35796615814322789562Neither support nor oppose28%28%27%28%11%28%27%--25%33%23%29%27%28%24%27%(0)

NMMGIJM

2521311311001043108261-213825648010937261Tend to oppose (-1)12%13%13%10%25%23%14%65%-15%16%9%12%15%13%10%13%

NNLNJGFFIJLMN

132647637101975140-1492136367128140Strongly oppose (-2)6%6%7%4%24%10%9%35%-10%4%7%7%7%9%8%7%

NMNMNJHCIJKMN

1155960753431--719826255412119Don't know/no opinion6%6%6%7%6%2%4%--5%8%3%5%5%7%3%6%

NNGCBFIlN

9854794895161465368-9686596172261240363200968Support48%47%48%51%34%36%46%-100%46%40%59%48%46%44%55%47%

NLJGHFGFCBCFGI*

3841942071372061183401-35474610011618065401Oppose19%19%20%14%49%34%23%100%-25%20%16%18%22%22%18%20%

NNLMNJHFCIn

601284282379-64185-4019683149126161124182135566Net support29%28%27%37%-2%23%-100%21%20%43%29%24%22%37%28%

NNLMNJGHFGEFCBdFGIn

0.450.430.410.59-0.230.040.33-1.351.400.340.340.620.430.380.330.540.42Mean scoreNNLMNJGHFFCBCFIn

1.151.151.181.071.511.181.210.480.491.261.071.171.141.181.201.191.16Std. Deviation0.030.040.040.040.280.100.050.030.020.120.080.080.050.060.050.070.03Std. Error


Table 1 (CONT.)

AT1.To what extent would you support or oppose a policy aimed at slowing down the growth in air travel?Base: All respondents

Proportions/Means: Tested at (5% risk level) - ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP/BC/DEFGH/EFGH/FGH/GH/IJ/KLMN/LMN/MN/OP* small base less than 30






OFGHIFGHEH

2259265419610611010179618394574249547143176141317Tend to support (1)33%28%31%30%32%34%31%30%32%29%29%36%29%30%31%29%44%28%34%29%32%

FGHIEE


L

6846251534403837252335322414121824214768115Tend to oppose (-1)10%14%12%11%11%13%11%11%10%11%12%12%12%10%8%10%15%14%9%14%11%

CBC

4114196132010241481617410111497213455Strongly oppose (-2)6%4%9%4%4%7%3%7%6%4%6%7%2%7%7%7%6%4%4%7%6%

POIIICIOS


MMMEFGHDJM

3931801288017518621317513211416716010989981129472308266574Support58%56%60%60%59%60%60%52%53%55%58%62%55%64%62%60%59%46%59%55%57%

OFGHDN

109604421476048613931514928232432342868102170Oppose16%19%21%15%16%19%14%18%16%15%18%19%14%17%15%17%21%18%13%21%17%

CBC

28412084591271261651149383116111816674796144240164404Net support42%37%39%44%43%41%46%34%38%40%40%43%41%47%47%42%38%28%46%34%40%

OFGHICBCDNO

0.640.630.620.710.670.620.760.520.600.640.660.640.680.750.730.680.480.470.720.550.64Mean scoreOCBCNO



Table 2

AT1.To what extent would you support or oppose a policy aimed at slowing down the growth in air travel?Base: All version 1 - with Q1 preamble






10015694325022681383167578681111412742754191831001UnWtd. Total1000562439488*2683395170574691131382662754011921000Wtd. Total


JGIJN

319175142150524137-317163453918112168317Tend to support (1)32%31%32%31%20%29%35%-55%23%30%39%34%30%30%35%32%

JHIJ


GIJ

11262534981839115-8161228375013115Tend to oppose (-1)11%11%12%10%30%22%10%68%-12%14%8%10%13%13%7%11%

NNLMJCBIJLM

55302613653155-6491616311055Strongly oppose (-2)5%5%6%3%24%6%8%32%-9%3%6%6%6%8%5%6%

NMMNJCIJKMN

45301932-114--392101326549Don't know/no opinion4%5%4%7%-1%4%--4%8%1%4%5%7%3%5%

GFIJN

5783132612931041229-574385595156152211125574Support58%56%59%60%40%49%58%-100%55%48%69%59%55%53%65%57%

JGFCBCFIJ

167927863142370170-14192044528123170Oppose17%16%18%13%54%28%18%100%-20%17%15%16%19%20%12%17%

NMNMJCCIJLMN

411221183230-418159-170574243575113100130102404Net support41%39%42%47%-22%40%-100%34%31%54%42%36%33%53%40%

NMNLMJGHFFCBCFGI*

0.640.620.660.79-0.180.360.58-1.321.450.600.500.800.630.590.510.800.64Mean scoreNNMNJCBCIJLn



Table 2 (CONT.)

AT1.To what extent would you support or oppose a policy aimed at slowing down the growth in air travel?Base: All version 1 - with Q1 preamble







RPOMMIIIOQ

18284463480721148060508867643645414534143122266Tend to support (1)26%24%19%24%27%22%31%23%23%23%29%25%31%24%28%21%26%21%27%24%25%

SPOIIIOS


ROIIINOR

9651511635534648322838482321212624325790147Tend to oppose (-1)14%14%21%11%12%16%12%14%12%13%13%18%11%14%13%13%14%20%10%18%14%

SSICBCDS

53323310184025212913192471519161712345185Strongly oppose (-2)8%9%14%7%6%12%7%6%11%6%6%9%3%10%11%8%10%7%6%10%8%

SPPMIIIICCIPS


SMMCBCJMS

276118724713010517611382841191081015666666046208185394Support40%33%30%33%44%32%47%32%32%39%39%40%49%37%40%33%35%28%39%36%38%

RSPOIIIGIDIMqS

149838427529270696142577229364042404491141232Oppose21%23%35%19%18%28%19%20%23%19%19%27%14%24%24%21%24%27%17%28%22%

SSPPKIIIICBCIPQS

12735-1221781310544224263367220262419211845162Net support18%10%-15%26%4%28%13%8%19%21%13%35%13%16%12%11%1%22%9%15%

USRSPOPMMKIIIIEiCBdIKM*

0.260.11-0.080.170.410.020.410.180.070.310.260.200.540.170.180.180.110.010.300.120.21Mean scoreRSPOMMIIIIICBdIMO*



Table 3

AT1.To what extent would you support or oppose a policy aimed at slowing down the growth in air travel?Base: All version 2 - no Q1 preamble








NLJFIJL

27311315215411988-26620264871589647266Tend to support (1)26%25%26%29%7%20%22%-67%27%20%31%26%23%23%27%25%

NJIJN


IJ

14069785122469147-13221336435924147Tend to oppose (-1)13%15%13%10%16%25%17%63%-18%17%9%13%17%14%14%14%

NNJGFIJKLN

773451234144485-85132120401885Strongly oppose (-2)7%7%9%4%25%14%11%37%-11%4%8%7%8%10%10%8%

NNNJIJKLN

702940423317--4106161328670Don't know/no opinion7%6%7%8%18%3%4%--5%8%4%6%5%7%4%7%

NIJK

407166228223324139-3942841771048815175394Support39%36%39%42%23%25%35%-100%38%32%50%38%35%36%43%38%

NNJGFFFIJLN

21710312974638113232-21282657649942232Oppose21%22%22%14%40%39%28%100%-28%22%17%20%26%23%24%22%

NNNJIJKLN

1906399149-3-1426-2323947135148245233162Net support18%14%17%28%--7%-100%9%10%33%17%10%12%19%15%

NNLMNJGHFEFCCDFIKn

0.250.190.230.40-0.32-0.240.09-1.371.330.090.200.450.230.140.170.260.21Mean scoreNNLNJHFFIJKLN



Table 3 (CONT.)

AT1.To what extent would you support or oppose a policy aimed at slowing down the growth in air travel?Base: All version 2 - no Q1 preamble






9384583512034124524854603152794113912782182362642111917306661396Protecting the environment68%68%77%73%69%71%67%67%62%66%69%74%69%75%73%69%64%60%69%67%68%should be given priority,

SMLMGHFGHIDGHJMSeven at the risk of slowingdown economic growth in theair travel industry

152795340666875894956715537282352444885147232Economic growth in the air11%12%12%15%11%11%10%13%10%13%12%10%9%10%7%14%13%15%8%15%11%travel industry should be

GGGICBCDGgiven priority, even if theenvironment suffers to someextent

1689437207579958873617850512537445848135127262Both should be given equal12%14%8%7%13%12%13%13%14%14%13%10%12%9%11%11%18%15%13%13%13%priority

RSLMFGHHEHJRS


SPMMMECBCKMOS


Table 4

AT2.Which of these statements about the way airlines operate do you most agree with?Base: All respondents







1405688708688221215621848251001612223543675152651396Protecting the environment69%67%69%68%54%67%71%46%85%70%66%76%65%70%62%72%68%should be given priority,

MJGFCCFIJeven at the risk of slowingdown economic growth in theair travel industry

2251141189611309511357202823775311452232Economic growth in the air11%11%11%9%27%17%12%28%6%14%12%8%14%10%14%14%11%travel industry should be

NNMJFCEIJLngiven priority, even if theenvironment suffers to someextent

2581441181365191028263183038726213034262Both should be given equal13%14%11%13%12%10%13%20%7%13%12%13%13%12%16%9%13%priority

JCBCIJ

162768495312342322423942436615160Don't know/no opinion8%7%8%9%7%6%4%6%2%3%9%3%8%8%8%4%8%

NJHGFFHCBFHIKN


Table 4 (CONT.)

AT2.Which of these statements about the way airlines operate do you most agree with?Base: All respondents







KLMGFGHIDJM

27111487451081241461157678130100686164736058195190385Tend to support (1)40%33%36%35%37%39%40%34%30%38%42%39%34%40%44%35%36%38%38%37%37%

MMM


UMLMHIGGGGJMTU

7847381731424043372833261816122235236065125Tend to oppose (-1)11%14%16%13%11%13%11%13%14%14%11%10%9%10%8%10%21%15%12%13%12%

FGHIE

5224226212318352315201910131319139324476Strongly oppose (-2)8%7%9%4%7%7%5%10%9%7%6%7%5%9%9%9%8%6%6%9%7%

ONO

49173522153417326198223714317402566Don't know7%5%1%4%8%5%9%5%13%3%6%3%11%2%5%7%2%11%8%5%6%

SPMMMIHFIEHDEHjL*

42318714978167199221191115119198179117961071248978305305611Support62%55%62%61%58%62%60%56%45%57%64%70%59%63%73%59%53%51%59%60%59%

MMLMIGGGDGJMU

130716022526558785944534528292540473292109201Oppose19%21%25%17%18%20%16%23%23%21%17%18%14%19%17%19%28%21%18%21%20%

OGIEIOS

29311689561151331631135575145134896782834146213196410Net support43%34%37%43%40%42%45%33%22%36%47%52%45%44%56%40%25%30%41%39%40%

UOPMLMLMHGFGHIGHIDEGJK*

0.620.510.550.670.580.600.660.470.320.500.670.790.720.590.800.600.350.430.610.550.58Mean scoreMLMGIGIEGJM



Table 5

AT3.To what extent would you support or oppose...- Airlines paying higher taxes to reflect the environmental damage done by aircraft even if it means higher air fareBase: All respondents who who received tax preamble



SupportAir Taxslowing growthNewspaper

IntroductionFlown in last 12 monthsin air travelVoting IntentionReadershipSix toOne toLib

UnwtdIntroductionNone16+15fiveOpposeSupportOtherUndecidedDemLabourConservativeTabloidBroadsheetTotalTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J)(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)


229226133717681517816184852678347226Strongly support (2)22%22%26%29%17%18%7%36%23%14%31%20%24%20%25%22%

NJGFGFGIJN

386385173740162592152457669210515485385Tend to support (1)38%37%33%28%39%44%28%44%34%44%43%35%38%37%45%37%

NJBIJKN

158150925143833418271441396827150Neither support nor oppose15%15%18%19%14%10%16%8%11%21%9%16%14%17%14%15%(0)

NJGGIKN

1201254611958583016101242285610125Tend to oppose (-1)12%12%9%2%19%16%28%6%23%8%8%16%10%14%5%12%

NNJHHFGHCBHlN

69762861132391349101826331176Strongly oppose (-2)7%7%5%22%11%9%19%3%6%7%6%7%10%8%6%7%

NJIJMN

596648-112311293211019866Don't know6%6%9%-1%3%1%2%3%7%2%8%4%5%4%6%

NNFECDFIlN

6156113061457230743934075115144172237132611Support60%59%59%57%56%62%36%80%57%57%75%54%63%57%70%59%

JGHFFCBFIJ

1892017463090974420192160548922201Oppose19%20%14%24%29%24%47%9%29%15%14%22%20%22%11%20%

NNJHHCBIJKLN

426410232827141-2334920569384118148110410Net support42%40%45%33%26%38%-71%28%43%61%32%43%36%58%40%

NLJGHFGEFHCBCEFI*

0.610.580.710.400.330.49-0.231.070.470.530.880.480.600.500.810.58Mean scoreNNJGHFFCBFIJLN

1.181.201.151.501.261.221.260.981.251.081.141.211.251.211.081.20Std. Deviation0.040.040.060.350.140.070.100.050.160.110.100.080.080.060.090.04Std. Error


Table 5 (CONT.)

AT3.To what extent would you support or oppose...- Airlines paying higher taxes to reflect the environmental damage done by aircraft even if it means higher air fareBase: All respondents who who received tax preamble







OLMLMFGHIDJLoS

234117795410411112211977799799664764685849188164352Tend to support (1)34%35%36%37%34%35%34%34%30%37%34%37%32%34%37%39%35%30%35%34%34%


OPMCBCN

8437191837433048312933282313141520375071121Tend to oppose (-1)12%11%9%12%12%14%8%14%12%14%12%10%11%10%8%8%12%22%9%15%12%

OEiCBCDO

4218178162116221910171338181595233760Strongly oppose (-2)6%5%8%5%5%7%5%6%8%5%6%5%2%6%10%9%6%3%4%8%6%

IIIGCCGI

3214251913221123995125421112301646Don't know5%4%1%3%6%4%6%3%9%4%3%2%6%4%2%1%7%7%6%3%5%

SMMMIFFFJMS

41419614693177190234186124120179187127851121189277321289610Support60%59%67%64%58%60%65%54%49%56%63%69%62%62%64%67%56%46%60%60%60%

SOMLMFGHIDJMNOS

126553626536447705040504126223230294273108181Oppose18%16%16%18%17%20%13%20%20%18%18%15%13%16%19%17%17%25%14%22%18%

POICBCDIO

2881411116712412618811574811291461016379886335247182429Net support42%42%51%46%40%40%52%33%29%38%45%54%49%46%46%50%38%21%46%38%42%

SPOMLMIEiCBdFIJ*

0.650.630.750.700.630.610.840.480.450.540.700.830.830.710.640.700.570.370.700.580.64Mean scorePOMLMIFHIDIJMNO



Table 6

AT3.To what extent would you support or oppose...- Airlines paying higher taxes to reflect the environmental damage done by aircraft even if it means higher air fareBase: All respondents with no tax preamble




IntroductionFlown in last 12 monthsin air travelVoting IntentionReadershipNoSix toOne toLib

UnwtdintroductionNone16+15fiveOpposeSupportOtherUndecidedDemLabourConservativeTabloidBroadsheetTotalTotal(P)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J)(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)



JHGFFCBCFGIJ

35635217432215156179183945999213065352Tend to support (1)35%34%35%22%28%36%29%37%26%35%33%35%37%31%37%34%

J


CBI

1211214631359432712171435236612121Tend to oppose (-1)12%12%9%21%17%14%22%6%16%15%10%12%9%16%7%12%

NJCBCIJN

61602237283876831120291160Strongly oppose (-2)6%6%4%23%8%7%20%2%8%7%2%4%8%7%6%6%

NMJHFFIJM

504628-1132626214719446Don't know5%5%6%-1%3%1%1%3%6%2%5%3%5%2%5%

IJ

61561030374325580387435795163155214132610Support60%60%61%43%55%60%41%81%60%51%68%59%62%52%75%60%

JGCBCFIJ

1821816872086823518251746439523181Oppose18%18%14%43%25%20%42%7%24%22%12%16%17%23%13%18%

NNMNJHCCIJMN

433429234024169-1352253278117111119110429Net support42%42%47%*30%40%-74%35%29%56%42%45%29%62%42%

NMNMNJGHFGFGCBCFGI*

0.640.640.73-0.010.500.60-0.081.170.630.410.910.650.640.440.970.64Mean scoreNJGFFCBCFGI*



Table 6 (CONT.)

AT3.To what extent would you support or oppose...- Airlines paying higher taxes to reflect the environmental damage done by aircraft even if it means higher air fareBase: All respondents with no tax preamble

Proportions/Means: Tested at (5% risk level) - ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP/BC/DEFGH/EFGH/FGH/GH/IJ/KLMN/LMN/MN* small base less than 30






SOLMKLMFGIFGHIDJLMNS

50623116599211234269234153157227199134108128141118108383354736Tend to support (1)37%34%36%36%36%37%37%34%30%37%38%38%33%37%40%37%36%34%36%36%36%

MMMM


UPLMLMHIGGCBCGJL*

1628457356985709168576655412926365460110136246Tend to oppose (-1)12%12%12%13%12%13%10%13%13%14%11%10%10%10%8%9%16%19%10%14%12%

OFGHIFGHICCDEGO

9343381336443457422637311322313422145581136Strongly oppose (-2)7%6%8%5%6%7%5%8%8%6%6%6%3%8%10%9%7%4%5%8%7%

OIIIIFGCBCGINO

81316104128562855152814348111614297141112Don't know6%5%1%4%7%4%8%4%11%4%5%3%8%3%4%4%4%9%7%4%5%

SSPOMMMIIIIEFGHCBdHjM*

8373842951723443894553772392393773662441812182411811556265951221Support61%57%65%62%58%61%63%55%47%57%64%69%60%63%68%63%55%49%59%60%60%

SOPMLMLMIGFGHIDGJKM*

25612695481051291041481108310386545157707674165217382Oppose19%19%21%18%18%20%14%22%22%20%17%16%13%18%18%18%23%23%16%22%19%

POMIICBCINO

58125820012323926035122812915627428019013016217110581461378839Net support42%38%44%45%40%41%48%33%25%37%46%53%47%45%50%44%32%25%44%38%41%

POPMLMKLMFGHIFGHICBeGIk*

0.630.570.650.690.610.610.750.480.380.520.690.810.780.640.710.640.460.400.660.570.61Mean scorePOLMLMGIFGHIDEIJMo



Table 7

AT3.To what extent would you support or oppose...- Airlines paying higher taxes to reflect the environmental damage done by aircraft even if it means higher air fareBase: All respondents







488259226262113817240386403698117130167114484Strongly support (2)24%25%22%26%26%21%22%10%40%28%15%33%21%25%20%31%24%

JHGFGFGCBCFGI*

74235238534610623131153944296112191197284150736Tend to support (1)36%34%37%34%26%34%39%29%41%30%40%38%35%38%34%41%36%

NJCBIJK

3401841501877291086393175139978315345335Neither support nor oppose17%18%15%18%17%16%14%16%10%12%21%13%18%16%19%12%16%(0)

NJHGCBCIKN

2411211259243211710158272726765112223246Tend to oppose (-1)12%12%12%9%9%18%15%25%6%19%11%9%14%10%15%6%12%

NNJHHFEHCBCHlN

13060765091759772110171229466222136Strongly oppose (-2)6%6%7%5%22%10%7%19%2%7%7%4%5%9%8%6%7%

NMNMNJEFDIJMN

109466676-225516515635173712112Don't know5%5%6%8%-1%3%1%2%3%6%2%6%3%5%3%5%

NNGFEDFIlN

123061061160821101485154780831322103073274512641221Support60%60%59%60%52%55%61%38%81%58%55%72%56%62%55%72%60%

JGHFFCBCFIJ

3711812011431350176179783844381059818444382Oppose18%18%20%14%31%27%22%45%8%26%18%13%19%19%22%12%19%

NNNJHFCBCFHlN

859429410466851309-247024588171202229267220839Net support42%42%40%46%21%28%39%-73%32%36%59%37%44%32%60%41%

NNLMNJGHFEFHCBCEFH*

0.630.640.580.720.250.400.55-0.161.120.550.470.900.570.620.470.880.61Mean scoreNNNJGHFFCBCFIJ*



Table 7 (CONT.)

AT3.To what extent would you support or oppose...- Airlines paying higher taxes to reflect the environmental damage done by aircraft even if it means higher air fareBase: All respondents







SOPMKLMGHFGHIDGJMNS

440213144861972022392131421301941881319411312110887339315654Tend to support (1)32%32%32%31%33%32%33%31%28%31%33%36%32%32%35%31%33%27%32%32%32%

MM


USKLMIEFGHCBdGJM*

2201088356811109212679829276514638557662139190329Tend to oppose (-1)16%16%18%20%14%17%13%18%16%19%16%14%12%16%12%14%23%19%13%19%16%

RPOFGHIGICBCEGIO

11753512139594270423548451927344826177892170Strongly oppose (-2)9%8%11%8%7%9%6%10%8%8%8%8%5%9%11%12%8%5%7%9%8%

SPOIIIFGFINOS

933581144336529582331163411141519337949128Don't know7%5%2%4%7%5%9%4%11%5%5%3%8%4%4%4%6%10%7%5%6%

SPOMMMIIIFGHCBdIJM*

7073372561453033313923212091993133242161571902001591235415031044Support52%50%56%53%51%52%54%47%41%47%53%61%54%54%59%52%48%38%51%51%51%

OMKLMGEiDGJMNS

3381611347712116913419612111714012070747210310279217282499Oppose25%24%29%28%20%27%18%29%24%28%24%23%17%25%23%27%31%25%20%28%24%

RSPOIIGIICBCEIN*

36917612268182162258125878117320414783117975644324221545Net support27%26%27%25%31%25%36%18%17%19%29%39%36%29%37%25%17%14%31%22%27%

POPLMKLMIHGIFGHIFGHICBeGIJ*

0.410.380.410.400.450.390.560.250.250.290.430.580.580.430.520.350.260.220.460.340.40Mean scorePOMLMIGIGHICCDIJMo



Table 8

AT4.To what extent would you support or oppose...- Doubling the air passenger duty to reflect the environmental damage done by aircraftBase: All respondents








JHGFGCBCFGIJ

668309344315955270923834475113158175252128654Tend to support (1)33%30%34%31%21%30%34%23%40%31%31%39%29%33%31%35%32%

JFFIJ


NNJHGGHEGCBdGiKN

324164165129737157120962928381068514145329Tend to oppose (-1)16%16%16%13%17%20%20%30%10%21%11%13%19%16%17%12%16%

NNJHFGCBEGIkN

160838765102769833816211638557725170Strongly oppose (-2)8%8%8%6%23%15%9%21%4%11%9%6%7%10%9%7%8%

NNLMJFIJLMN

1256167811433723520938214616128Don't know6%6%7%8%2%2%4%2%2%3%8%3%7%4%6%4%6%

NNGFEGDFIlN

10615105345231790409125696771071832522853872281044Support52%50%52%52%41%49%51%31%72%54%44%63%46%54%47%62%51%

JGFEFGCBCEgIJ

484247252194176422520313445495514414021970499Oppose24%24%25%19%41%35%28%51%14%32%20%19%26%27%26%19%24%

NNNJHHFFCBFIn

577264282329026183-795633258128108145168157545Net support28%26%27%32%*14%23%-58%22%24%44%20%28%20%43%27%

NMNLMNJGHFEFCBCEFIn

0.420.400.400.51-0.040.190.33-0.330.890.350.310.640.320.400.290.660.40Mean scoreNNNJGHFFCBCFIJ*



Table 8 (CONT.)

AT4.To what extent would you support or oppose...- Doubling the air passenger duty to reflect the environmental damage done by aircraftBase: All respondents







KLMFGHIDJMS

2341117044101109127108736910993685156695149178167344Tend to support (1)34%32%29%34%35%34%35%32%29%33%36%36%34%33%38%33%31%32%34%33%34%


SLMIFGDJMS

10264502443604660413851352325173539277194165Tend to oppose (-1)15%19%21%18%15%19%13%18%16%18%17%14%11%17%11%17%23%17%14%18%16%

PGICEIOS

5730278212523392418222411151323178444387Strongly oppose (-2)8%9%11%6%7%8%6%11%9%9%7%9%6%10%9%11%10%5%8%9%8%

ON

52155519163615338198184914420392967Don't know8%4%2%4%7%5%10%5%13%4%6%3%9%2%6%7%2%13%7%6%7%

SPOMMMIIEHDEHJM*

3631711297215017419316710410416316310684921098064267267534Support53%50%54%55%52%54%53%49%41%50%53%63%53%55%62%52%48%42%51%53%52%

MKLMGGHDGJM

1599477326485699964577359344130585634115138252Oppose23%27%32%24%22%26%19%29%25%27%24%23%17%26%20%28%33%22%22%27%25%

SPOIIGIEINOS

205775240878912469394891104714362512529152130282Net support30%23%22%31%30%28%34%20%15%23%30%40%36%28%42%24%15%19%29%25%27%

USOPMKLMHGIFGHIGIDEGIJ*

0.440.330.360.480.430.420.500.270.210.330.430.600.540.410.610.350.230.270.410.390.40Mean scoreOMLMGIGIGJMN



Table 9

AT4.To what extent would you support or oppose...- Doubling the air passenger duty to reflect the environmental damage done by aircraftBase: All respondents who who received tax preamble




IntroductionFlown in last 12 monthsin air travelVoting IntentionReadershipSix toOne toLib

UnwtdIntroductionNone16+15fiveOpposeSupportOtherUndecidedDemLabourConservativeTabloidBroadsheetTotalTotal(O)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J)(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)



NJGFCBIJKN

34934416353413845207264763799114074344Tend to support (1)34%34%31%21%34%37%22%42%37%36%41%30%33%34%39%34%

JFIJ


NHGGCBGILN

1611656052378694915111860436624165Tend to oppose (-1)16%16%12%19%22%21%33%10%21%8%12%22%15%16%13%16%

NNJHFGEGIJKN

81873631731392271182030381487Strongly oppose (-2)8%8%7%14%17%8%19%4%11%9%5%7%11%9%7%8%

NLJIJL

606747-1152112105201023967Don't know6%7%9%-1%4%1%2%3%8%3%7%4%5%5%7%

NNDIJKLN

540534274115219361352386499120151207121534Support53%52%53%45%51%52%29%72%55%49%65%45%55%50%64%52%

JGFECBEFIJ

2422529684010810970222226797310438252Oppose24%25%18%33%39%29%53%14%31%17%17%30%26%25%20%25%

NNJHHFGFEgIlN

29828217831385-48282164273417810383282Net support29%27%34%12%12%23%-58%23%32%48%15%28%25%44%27%

NNLNJGHFGEFCBEFIlN

0.420.400.530.220.130.31-0.350.850.310.390.680.250.410.340.640.40Mean scoreNNJGHFFCBEFIJ*



Table 9 (CONT.)

AT4.To what extent would you support or oppose...- Doubling the air passenger duty to reflect the environmental damage done by aircraftBase: All respondents who who received tax preamble







OMLMFGHIFGHIDEJMNO

2061037342969311210569618594634356515738161148309Tend to support (1)30%31%34%29%31%29%31%30%27%29%30%35%31%31%32%29%35%23%30%31%30%

ED


URSMEGHCBdJMSu

11945333238514766394440412821222038356796164Tend to oppose (-1)17%13%15%22%12%16%13%19%15%20%14%15%13%15%12%12%23%21%12%20%16%

ROFGIFCBCEQ

612224131933193119172621812212599354883Strongly oppose (-2)9%7%11%9%6%11%5%9%7%8%9%8%4%9%12%14%5%5%6%10%8%

SPIIIFFCFIO

412036251729142515128168621514402161Don't know6%6%1%4%8%5%8%4%10%7%4%3%8%6%3%1%9%8%7%4%6%

SOMMHIFGFCCFJMS

34416612774152157200154105941491611117398917859274236510Support50%50%59%50%50%50%55%45%42%44%52%59%54%54%56%52%48%35%51%49%50%

OMLMEiDJMNOS

1796758455784659857616762353343454745102145247Oppose26%20%27%31%19%27%18%28%23%28%24%23%17%24%24%25%28%27%19%30%24%

RSPOIICBCINO*

16599692896731345648348210076405546321417291264Net support24%30%32%19%31%23%37%16%19%16%29%37%37%30%32%26%19%9%32%19%26%

SRPOPLMLMIGHIEiCBdIJL*

0.370.440.460.330.480.350.620.220.290.250.440.550.610.460.450.350.290.170.500.280.40Mean scorePOLMIIHICBdIJNO



Table 10

AT4.To what extent would you support or oppose...- Doubling the air passenger duty to reflect the environmental damage done by aircraftBase: All respondents with no tax preamble




IntroductionFlown in last 12 monthsin air travelVoting IntentionReadershipNoSix toOne toLib

UnwtdintroductionNone16+15fiveOpposeSupportOtherUndecidedDemLabourConservativeTabloidBroadsheetTotalTotal(P)(N)(M)(L)(K)(J)(I)(H)(G)(F)(E)(D)(C)(B)(A)



JHGCBCIJ

31930915232013247176182950788411254309Tend to support (1)31%30%31%21%25%31%24%37%25%26%36%28%34%27%31%30%

JI


NHGEGDGIN

1631646821479514715172046427621164Tend to oppose (-1)16%16%14%14%18%19%26%10%20%15%15%17%17%18%12%16%

JIJ

79832961038441681081925391183Strongly oppose (-2)8%8%6%40%13%9%23%3%11%9%6%7%10%9%6%8%

NMNMJIJMN

65613413194122104181023761Don't know6%6%7%7%4%4%2%3%3%9%3%6%4%6%4%6%

IJ

52151024953721664344384384132134179107510Support51%50%50%34%47%51%33%72%53%39%60%47%54%44%61%50%

JGFGCBCFGIJ

242247978241179563232728656711533247Oppose24%24%20%54%30%28%49%13%32%24%20%23%27%28%18%24%

NNMNJCCIJMN

279264152-31399-3128115165567676574264Net support27%26%31%-17%23%-59%22%15%40%24%27%16%42%26%

NMNMNJGHFFGCBCFGI*

0.420.400.48-0.510.270.36-0.310.930.400.200.600.390.390.240.680.40Mean scoreNMJGCBCFIJM



Table 10 (CONT.)

AT4.To what extent would you support or oppose...- Doubling the air passenger duty to reflect the environmental damage done by aircraftBase: All respondents with no tax preamble

Proportions/Means: Tested at (5% risk level) - ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP/BC/DEFGH/EFGH/FGH/GH/IJ/KLMN/LMN/MN* small base less than 30






SPOLLMJLOP

350170120731501661711841251141731089352809599102281240521Tend to support (1)26%25%26%27%25%26%24%27%25%27%29%21%23%18%25%25%30%32%27%24%25%

KLHHHFHIDHJK


RSIIGCCGQS

283146119721031291631368188109151837772846053209219429Tend to oppose (-1)21%22%26%26%17%20%23%20%16%21%18%29%21%27%22%22%18%17%20%22%21%

RSKLMHHHJMQRS

149747720588072714038598637435253241388134222Strongly oppose (-2)11%11%17%7%10%13%10%10%8%9%10%16%9%15%16%14%7%4%8%14%11%

SSKLMIIFGHFGHICBeGHJ*

844011633226834541730233110141917358045125Don't know6%6%2%2%6%3%9%5%11%4%5%4%8%3%4%5%5%11%8%5%6%

RSPOMMMIEFGHCBdHMO*

53125216911923026623728019518924515314289122149149133406377783Support39%37%37%43%39%42%33%41%38%45%41%29%35%31%38%39%45%42%38%38%38%

POKLMHHIHEHJLOP

432220196921612092352071211261672361201211241378466298353651Oppose31%32%43%34%27%33%32%30%24%30%28%45%30%42%39%36%25%21%28%36%32%

SSKLMIIFGHFGHICBeGHJ*

10032-27267057174736378-8322-32-212656610823132Net support7%5%-10%12%9%*11%14%15%13%-6%--3%20%21%10%2%6%

USPOIGFGHIFGHICBhJu

0.100.06-0.120.190.160.13-0.010.150.230.250.16-0.250.09-0.14-0.040.030.290.290.150.030.09Mean scoreSSOKLMIFGHIFGHICCeHJL*



Table 11

AT5.Suppose taxes on flying were raised so as to add about £20 to the cost of a return flight to Paris and around £200 to a return flight to Australia.If this were the case, to what extent would you support or oppose higher tax on air travel if all the money raised:- went towards cutting income taxBase: All respondents








JCCIJ

521252269259114320610326337708612411622589521Tend to support (1)25%25%26%26%26%24%26%26%27%26%29%29%23%22%27%24%25%

F


NNJN

42321521418495218510022333376112012814988429Tend to oppose (-1)21%21%21%18%21%28%23%25%23%24%15%21%22%25%18%24%21%

NNGGCCDGIJ*

21711211181113695789615194154747658222Strongly oppose (-2)11%11%11%8%27%20%12%19%10%11%8%14%10%14%9%16%11%

NNLMNJGEGCBDJLMN

1176461741236626821931194914125Don't know6%6%6%7%2%1%5%2%3%5%9%3%6%4%6%4%6%

NNGGDFIlN

786384399402125930714040857100116191187349126783Support38%38%39%40%30%33%39%35%42%40%41%40%35%36%42%34%38%

JCCI

64032632526519882801783194956102174202225147651Oppose31%32%32%26%47%48%35%44%33%34%23%35%32%39%27%40%32%

NNLNJHGGEGCBdGJlN

1465874137-7-2827-38898441417-15125-21132Net support7%6%7%14%--3%-9%5%18%5%3%-15%-6%

NNMNJHGGEGCBeGIn

0.100.080.100.21-0.41-0.270.04-0.200.150.090.250.010.06-0.040.22-0.120.09Mean scoreNNLMNJGGGCBdGJLn



Table 11 (CONT.)

AT5.Suppose taxes on flying were raised so as to add about £20 to the cost of a return flight to Paris and around £200 to a return flight to Australia.If this were the case, to what extent would you support or oppose higher tax on air travel if all the money raised:- went towards cutting income taxBase: All respondents







OPMMIGEiDGMNPS

47225116310620222024226017616319718714588106133126125388335723Tend to support (1)34%37%36%39%34%35%33%38%35%38%33%35%36%30%33%35%38%39%37%34%35%

H


SGS

7345251526333451252834302319122223204474118Tend to oppose (-1)5%7%5%5%4%5%5%7%5%7%6%6%6%7%4%6%7%6%4%7%6%

OCBCN

521824417261430201121189121618105294170Strongly oppose (-2)4%3%5%2%3%4%2%4%4%3%4%3%2%4%5%5%3%2%3%4%3%

SPOIFGOS

7830963215662647112722298121512316642108Don't know6%4%2%2%5%2%9%4%9%3%5%4%7%3%4%4%4%10%6%4%5%

RSPOMMMIEFGHCDHLp*

10034933582224304885214873383204374012942082492882442137797171496Support73%73%78%81%73%77%72%71%67%76%74%76%73%72%78%75%74%67%74%72%73%

RSPMMMFGDMPRS

125634919435948814539564931322939332573115188Oppose9%9%11%7%7%9%7%12%9%9%9%9%8%11%9%10%10%8%7%12%9%

OCBCNO

8784293092033874294744062932813813532631762212492111887066021308Net support64%63%68%74%65%67%65%59%58%66%64%67%65%61%69%65%64%59%67%61%64%

ROPMMMHGCBCMNPR

1.051.011.071.171.071.081.120.910.951.041.061.081.071.011.131.051.000.941.080.991.04Mean scoreOPGMNOR



Table 12

AT6.Suppose taxes on flying were raised so as to add about £20 to the cost of a return flight to Paris and around £200 to a return flight to Australia.If this were the case, to what extent would you support or oppose higher tax on air travel if all the money raised:- went towards improving the environmentBase: All respondents








JGFFCBFIJK

7233543683786652701413164485105179200279121723Tend to support (1)35%35%36%37%15%36%34%35%33%31%35%36%33%38%34%33%35%

NMMIM


JHGFHEGCEIJ

1175167462185160289131230345211118Tend to oppose (-1)6%5%6%5%6%10%6%15%3%6%5%4%6%6%6%3%6%

NJCBIJLN

683634256112838139952019341370Strongly oppose (-2)3%4%3%2%15%6%4%10%1%6%4%2%4%4%4%4%3%

NNMJHIJMN

995652681225620813828184115108Don't know5%5%5%7%2%1%3%1%2%5%5%3%5%3%5%4%5%

NNDFIlN

1505748748751231245932348461051672413794005752811496Support73%73%73%74%58%68%75%58%87%74%69%82%70%76%70%77%73%

NMJGHFEGCCFIJ

185881017192979984118231750538624188Oppose9%9%10%7%21%16%10%24%4%12%9%6%9%10%10%7%9%

NNLMNJHCFIJLMN

13206606476801595514136805871452243293484892571308Net support64%65%63%67%37%52%65%34%83%61%60%77%60%66%59%70%64%

NNLMJGHFFCBCFIJ*

1.041.051.021.090.650.801.050.481.391.040.951.250.991.050.961.151.04Mean scoreNNLMJGFFCBCFIJ*



Table 12 (CONT.)

AT6.Suppose taxes on flying were raised so as to add about £20 to the cost of a return flight to Paris and around £200 to a return flight to Australia.If this were the case, to what extent would you support or oppose higher tax on air travel if all the money raised:- went towards improving the environmentBase: All respondents







KLMJ

4302421559819921222123815415619816513772105134109115362310672Tend to support (1)31%36%34%35%34%33%30%35%30%37%33%31%34%25%33%35%33%36%34%31%33%

IHHHHH


SQS

1787766455581928349537776494936503834120136255Tend to oppose (-1)13%11%15%16%9%13%13%12%10%13%13%14%12%17%11%13%12%11%11%14%12%

RSMHHHMQ

1024356162855395028183563263425332255095145Strongly oppose (-2)7%6%12%6%5%9%5%7%5%4%6%12%6%12%8%9%7%2%5%10%7%

SSPKLMIHEiCBdHJL*

7731872915682644122824309121511316741108Don't know6%5%2%2%5%2%9%4%9%3%5%5%8%3%4%4%3%10%6%4%5%

SPOMMMIIIIEFGHCBdILp*

7774142711643583783964162892713552752261411952242032026385531190Support57%61%59%59%60%59%54%61%57%64%60%52%56%49%61%58%61%63%60%56%58%

OMKLHHHHCHJLO

28012012261831361311337672112140748261836039169230400Oppose20%18%27%22%14%21%18%19%15%17%19%26%18%29%19%21%18%12%16%23%20%

RSKLMIHHHFGHICBdHJM*

49729414910327524226528421220024413515158135141142163468322791Net support36%43%33%37%46%38%36%41%42%47%41%26%37%20%42%37%43%51%44%32%39%

URSKLMIHHHFGHICBdHJL*

0.570.660.470.570.720.570.610.620.690.720.650.360.570.330.650.540.670.850.700.490.60Mean scoreSKLMIHHFGHICBdHJL*



Table 13

AT7.Suppose taxes on flying were raised so as to add about £20 to the cost of a return flight to Paris and around £200 to a return flight to Australia.If this were the case, to what extent would you support or oppose higher tax on air travel if all the money raised:- went towards education and the health serviceBase: All respondents








NLJEFGCDFIJL

67532135135214602441353284872104183166255104672Tend to support (1)33%31%34%35%34%33%31%34%34%34%30%35%34%32%31%29%33%


NGFFFIN

254118137895321297710916283556879056255Tend to oppose (-1)12%12%13%9%12%18%16%19%11%12%12%12%10%17%11%15%12%

NNJECDJKLN

142628245132660575014141831545437145Strongly oppose (-2)7%6%8%4%32%14%8%14%5%10%6%6%6%10%7%10%7%

NMNLMNJECBDIJLn

1015752641328425914829184514108Don't know5%6%5%6%2%2%4%1%3%6%6%3%5%3%6%4%5%

NNDIJKL

11975975936222091455205648821411983302764931951190Support58%58%58%61%48%50%57%51%67%58%58%68%61%53%60%53%58%

NJGEFCDFIJLN

39618021913418581891331603142538714014493400Oppose19%18%21%13%44%32%24%33%17%22%17%18%16%27%18%25%20%

NNLMNJEFGCBDEInP

801417374488232266724885199145243136349102791Net support39%41%36%48%5%18%34%18%50%36%41%50%45%26%42%28%39%

NNLMNJHEFGHCBfIn

0.610.650.550.75-0.120.210.540.220.800.530.680.780.690.380.680.440.60Mean scoreNNLMNJEFGCBfIJLn



Table 13 (CONT.)

AT7.Suppose taxes on flying were raised so as to add about £20 to the cost of a return flight to Paris and around £200 to a return flight to Australia.If this were the case, to what extent would you support or oppose higher tax on air travel if all the money raised:- went towards education and the health serviceBase: All respondents







HHCBCS

3701771168117916219619011711617014411974891098669283264547Tend to support (1)27%26%25%29%30%25%27%28%23%28%29%27%29%26%28%28%26%22%27%27%27%

MIMQ


SMCBCMQS

27517310371106133165150101105133108836258797887228219448Tend to oppose (-1)20%26%23%26%18%21%23%22%20%25%23%20%21%21%18%21%24%27%22%22%22%

URGIDQTU

130636616417651654437476526344239312080113193Strongly oppose (-2)9%9%14%6%7%12%7%9%9%9%8%12%6%12%13%10%9%6%8%11%9%

SSPKIIGHCBCGIJ*

813511632196830491530223012171513307739116Don't know6%5%2%2%5%3%9%4%10%4%5%4%7%4%5%4%4%9%7%4%6%

RSPOMMMIEFHCBdMOP*

54324518511925024226927616616724620916111713515911798385402787Support40%36%41%43%42%38%37%40%33%39%42%39%40%41%42%41%35%31%36%41%38%

MMFGHIDMQ

4042361698814720921621614514218017310995101119109107308332640Oppose29%35%37%32%25%33%30%31%29%34%31%33%27%33%31%31%33%34%29%33%31%

URSCIQSTU

1389163110333546121256636522235407-97770147Net support10%1%4%11%17%5%7%9%4%6%11%7%13%7%11%10%2%-7%7%7%

USRSPLMKIFGHIFGHIDgIKM*

0.140.020.040.190.240.060.120.120.060.090.170.070.180.110.130.140.02-0.000.100.100.10Mean scoreSIQU



Table 14

AT8.Suppose taxes on flying were raised so as to add about £20 to the cost of a return flight to Paris and around £200 to a return flight to Australia.If this were the case, to what extent would you support or oppose higher tax on air travel if all the money raised:- went towards improving high speed rail servicesBase: All respondents








JHHHCBHIJ

5562612862741144218683143062100148137198116547Tend to support (1)27%26%28%27%27%24%27%17%32%21%25%34%27%26%24%32%27%

JGHFCBCFIJ


NNFCBCEIkN

43622322519765019513817430615810513017879448Tend to oppose (-1)21%22%22%19%16%27%25%34%18%21%25%20%19%25%22%22%22%

NNJEIJKN

1879010371102487796520232048628634193Strongly oppose (-2)9%9%10%7%24%13%11%20%7%14%10%7%9%12%10%9%9%

NNMNJHFDIJMN

1126156761226527813933204614116Don't know5%6%5%7%2%1%3%1%3%5%6%3%6%4%6%4%6%

NNDIJKLN

80738440438517703151014865483142205192292179787Support39%38%39%38%43%38%40%25%50%38%34%49%38%37%35%49%38%

JGFFCBCFIJ

6233133282681674282217238508478152193264113640Oppose30%31%32%26%40%41%36%54%25%35%35%27%28%37%32%31%31%

NNJEFDIJKLN

18471761171-432-1162484-16453-12866147Net support9%7%7%12%3%-4%-26%3%-22%10%-3%18%7%

NLNJHGHFGHEFHCBgIlN

0.130.110.090.17-0.06-0.020.05-0.410.380.07-0.010.310.12-0.020.050.270.10Mean scoreJGFFCBDFIJN



Table 14 (CONT.)

AT8.Suppose taxes on flying were raised so as to add about £20 to the cost of a return flight to Paris and around £200 to a return flight to Australia.If this were the case, to what extent would you support or oppose higher tax on air travel if all the money raised:- went towards improving high speed rail servicesBase: All respondents



AT5-8.went towards improving highwent towards education andwent towards improving thewent towards cutting income

speed rail servicesthe health serviceenvironmenttax


240519773262Strongly support (2)12%25%38%13%

547672723521Tend to support (1)27%33%35%25%

505351258491Neither support nor oppose25%17%13%24%(0)

448255118429Tend to oppose (-1)22%12%6%21%

19314570222Strongly oppose (-2)9%7%3%11%

116108108125Don't know6%5%5%6%

78711901496783Support38%58%73%38%

640400188651Oppose31%20%9%32%

1477911308132Net support7%39%64%6%

0.100.601.040.09Mean score

1.181.221.051.22Std. Deviation0.030.030.030.03Std. Error


Table 15

AT5-8.Suppose taxes on flying were raised so as to add about £20 to the cost of a return flight to Paris and around £200 to a return flight to Australia.If this were the case, to what extent would you support or oppose higher tax on air travel if all the money raised:Base: All respondents

Proportions/Means: Tested at (5% risk level) -* small base less than 30





333198141661341871891559712716714172609511693952872455321-2 (1.5)24%29%31%24%23%29%26%23%19%30%28%27%18%21%30%30%28%30%27%25%26%

USPMMMHIHIHIHIHIMNP*

1739093484574101872846801093246535340381131492623-5 (4)13%13%20%17%8%12%14%13%6%11%13%21%8%16%17%14%12%12%11%15%13%

RSMMKLMIIICBCIJM*

116376418254654521520467120322032262371821536-10 (8)8%6%14%6%4%7%7%8%3%5%8%13%5%11%6%8%8%7%7%8%7%

USSMKLMIHHjLMQ*

236135221413-4101415667410192911-15 (13)2%1%3%2%**2%2%-1%2%3%*2%2%2%2%1%1%2%1%

RSPPMMMIIIIJMPQS

8591-5181138-122712111316-20 (18)1%1%2%1%-1%*1%**1%2%-*1%1%2%**1%1%

SOLMHICBCEIJ*

3122-1-21--2111-1-21421-25 (23)***1%-*-**--****-*-***

6132-132-132-2113-25726-30 (28)**1%1%-***-*1%*-1%**1%-*1%*

---------------------31-35 (33)---------------------

7108-113122357-2410104131736+ (40)*2%2%-***2%*1%1%1%-1%1%3%***1%1%

USOPIIFFCCFINP*

6913231211333823113513523582212701672721391311611531585564581015None/never flown (0)50%48%27%48%64%49%48%51%71%52%46%32%67%48%41%42%46%49%53%46%50%

SRSMMKLMIIIIICBCFGI*

1453-471035-677182-110819Don't know1%1%1%-1%1%1%*1%-1%1%2%*2%1%-*1%1%1%

LLHGGIGGL


Table 16

AT9.Can you please tell me how many flights you have taken in the last 12 months. Please count each journey to an end destination but not any changes of flight en route to that destination. A returnflight would count as 2 flights?Base: All respondents






2.242.384.062.251.121.882.142.801.021.772.453.741.062.652.603.162.631.771.792.812.28Mean scoreSRSOPMLMKLMIIIIEiCBCFIJ*



Table 16 (CONT.)

AT9.Can you please tell me how many flights you have taken in the last 12 months. Please count each journey to an end destination but not any changes of flight en route to that destination. A returnflight would count as 2 flights?







519289243---5321042584074881361232261025321-2 (1.5)25%28%24%---67%26%27%28%31%30%25%23%27%28%26%

PLMNGKLMNOP

251135127---262791102122397477101652623-5 (4)12%13%12%---33%20%11%15%9%13%14%15%12%18%13%

LMNJCBJKLMN

1486984--153-545551423375954551536-10 (8)7%7%8%--84%-13%6%4%6%8%7%11%7%15%7%

MNJEGHCBDIlN

271019--29-8111265127172911-15 (13)1%1%2%--16%-2%1%1%1%2%1%2%1%5%1%

MNCBKLN

1258-13--7311342471316-20 (18)1%*1%-32%--2%*1%*1%1%**2%1%

NJCBIJKMN

431-4--22--2--22421-25 (23)***-9%--**--1%--***

NFMN

716-7--341214-13726-30 (28)**1%-17%--1%*1%1%*1%-*1%*

NCKMN

-----------------31-35 (33)-----------------

15711-17--95-1345661736+ (40)1%1%1%-42%--2%1%-*1%1%1%1%2%1%

NJJKMN

10494945211015---137516731241242782394171071015None/never flown (0)51%48%51%100%---34%53%51%51%43%51%46%51%29%50%

NNNJFCBFIn

18109-----5-02378319Don't know1%1%1%-----*-*1%1%1%1%1%1%

IJKN


Table 16 (CONT.)

AT9.Can you please tell me how many flights you have taken in the last 12 months. Please count each journey to an end destination but not any changes of flight en route to that destination. A returnflight would count as 2 flights?Base: All respondents







2.182.082.490.0029.408.792.333.961.881.741.902.782.192.641.994.242.28Mean scoreNMNLMNJCBCIJLn



Table 16 (CONT.)

AT9.Can you please tell me how many flights you have taken in the last 12 months. Please count each journey to an end destination but not any changes of flight en route to that destination. A returnflight would count as 2 flights?






709283271146257312324356229209293262175141158191165162-992992Male52%42%59%53%43%49%45%52%45%49%50%50%43%49%49%50%50%51%-100%48%

URSOCBCINO*

6643941851303363254023302782142982672301481631931671571058-1058Female48%58%41%47%57%51%55%48%55%51%50%50%57%51%51%50%50%49%100%-52%

URSOCBCINO*


Table 17

Gender.Base: All respondents







9204835094583110139424345285106136269252418186992Male45%47%50%45%76%55%50%61%47%60%44%46%49%48%51%51%48%

NMNMJHHHHHJMN

11305395195561081400158516581361562762724071791058Female55%53%50%55%24%45%50%39%53%40%56%54%51%52%49%49%52%

NMNMJHHHHHJMN


Table 17 (CONT.)

Gender.Base: All respondents






21010934247211311988906910556-----32015716232015-2415%16%8%9%12%18%16%13%18%16%18%11%-----100%15%16%16%

SPKLMEiDjNQs

15417897747497121113818410165----331-16716533125-3411%26%21%27%12%15%17%16%16%20%17%12%----100%-16%17%16%

URSKLFGHIDjLQu

13225313257881121351378678111110---385--19319138535-4410%37%29%21%15%18%19%20%17%18%19%21%---100%--18%19%19%

USRSGHIDiQSu

210111129376910611897616510095--321---16315832145-5415%16%28%13%12%17%16%14%12%15%17%18%--100%---15%16%16%

SSMMHIDiMQS

270194644100899910179477688-289----14814128955-6420%3%10%16%17%14%14%15%15%11%13%17%-100%----14%14%14%

USSLIDiQSu

3987174019111913515111180100114404-----23017540465+29%1%4%14%32%19%19%22%22%19%17%22%100%-----22%18%20%

USRSIIIIICBiQu


Table 18

Age.Base: All respondents







2791671531582261337311821694179441445032015-2414%16%15%16%4%14%17%18%12%15%29%14%14%8%17%14%16%

JHGGEFGHDGI

29216516615312341337415420375886611304533125-3414%16%16%15%28%18%17%18%16%14%15%20%16%12%16%12%16%

NFBD

358176208161143816974177353943118871246938535-4417%17%20%16%34%21%21%18%18%25%16%15%22%17%15%19%19%

NNHFEHCKMN

29117414713172614964163252663711011364932145-5414%17%14%13%18%14%19%16%17%17%11%22%13%19%16%13%16%

NGFEGDFGKN

3481361531396371065914520294279911146628955-6417%13%15%14%14%20%13%15%15%14%12%14%15%17%14%18%14%

NLBDL

482205200272121104572102142451121411778740465+24%20%19%27%2%11%13%14%22%15%17%15%21%27%22%24%20%

NNNJEFGHDJKLMN


Table 18 (CONT.)

Age.Base: All respondents






46324158193029---781813182054483078A3%5%9%2%1%3%4%4%---15%4%5%6%5%2%1%5%3%4%

SSKLMFGHIFGHIDEJmQS

3081431666657121191138---450967578896052218232450B22%21%36%24%10%19%26%20%---85%24%26%24%23%18%16%21%23%22%

SRSPOKLMHFGHIDJmOqS

40318814480140169244179--591-10076100111101105298293591C129%28%32%29%24%27%34%26%--100%-25%26%31%29%30%33%28%30%29%

SPOLMIIoQ

2791447877133154131137-423--804765788469214209423C220%21%17%28%22%24%18%20%-100%--20%16%20%20%26%22%20%21%21%

SPMHEHJmPR

216116264613211475143332---545340635467167165332D16%17%6%17%22%18%10%21%65%---13%18%12%16%16%21%16%17%16%

SSPOMMMHGIDJoQS

12253-2123605561175---57252123272211164175E9%8%-1%21%9%8%9%35%---14%9%7%6%8%7%10%6%9%

RSMMMIIIIICBCImQs


Table 19

Social Class.Base: All respondents







6542361461840213907151835243478A3%4%4%1%15%10%5%5%4%*3%5%3%7%3%9%4%

NNLMNHEHCBDHKn

449230221152146720910022929488995147139153450B22%22%21%15%34%37%26%25%24%20%20%30%17%28%17%42%22%

NNLNGHFEGCBfKLN

5872843072701256247107286366884155169231123591C129%28%30%27%29%31%31%27%30%26%28%29%29%32%28%34%29%

BN

398214208221525173731983358591218620131423C219%21%20%22%12%14%22%18%20%24%24%20%22%16%24%9%21%

NLEGCBCDL

2791571752234129371141334232915816516332D14%15%17%22%9%7%12%18%15%23%17%11%17%11%20%5%16%

NNHFEGHCBdFHK*

2729481135033229741019126528658175E13%9%8%13%1%2%4%7%8%7%8%4%12%5%8%2%9%

NNNFECBDfKLN


Table 19 (CONT.)

Social Class.Base: All respondents






12555382954--1805740463740272341252378102180Scotland9%8%8%10%9%--26%11%9%8%7%10%9%7%11%8%7%7%10%9%

OPMCCMNOP

6426211731--9026212419131218132212424890North East5%4%5%6%5%--13%5%5%4%4%3%4%6%3%7%4%4%5%4%

OPNOP

471415716--6117131516181076119273461Merseyside3%2%3%3%3%--9%3%3%3%3%4%3%2%1%3%3%3%3%3%

OPINOP

11663351873--179433552484821224130169385179North West8%9%8%6%12%--26%9%8%9%9%12%7%7%11%9%5%9%9%9%

RSOPIIFIDINOPQ

11462402464--177612840473131273624279087177Yorks & Humberside8%9%9%9%11%--26%12%7%7%9%8%11%9%9%7%9%9%9%9%

OPMMMNOPQ

10250152352152--424541232314242736296983152East Midlands7%7%3%9%9%24%--8%11%7%4%6%5%8%7%11%9%7%8%7%

SSPPLMHIHEHJLN*

12760363453187--4856444031253233343310681187West Midlands9%9%8%12%9%29%--10%13%7%7%8%9%10%9%10%10%10%8%9%

PPLLLNOP

7530111038105--38162723271911156265352105Wales5%4%2%3%6%16%--8%4%5%4%7%7%4%4%2%8%5%5%5%

SPPMMHIEFGDEMpS

12258422852-180-4039564546312730252110377180South West9%9%9%10%9%-25%-8%9%10%8%11%11%9%8%8%7%10%8%9%

PIINOP

12666602346192--453757543931393722259696192Eastern9%10%13%8%8%30%--9%9%10%10%10%11%12%10%7%8%9%10%9%

SPPGNOPS

16894552258-262-56389573303245435360141121262London12%14%12%8%10%-36%-11%9%16%14%7%11%14%11%16%19%13%12%13%

PLMLIIFHIDIKLNr


Table 20

GO Region.Base: All respondents






18698874158-284-335592104593746624338159126284South East14%14%19%15%10%-39%-7%13%16%20%14%13%14%16%13%12%15%13%14%

RSPMMLMJMqS


Table 20 (CONT.)

GO Region.







220938794111560367431342046289432180Scotland11%9%8%9%28%8%8%9%8%22%14%7%8%5%11%9%9%

NMMGHGHGHCDGHM

9045454937311638311163411431090North East4%4%4%5%6%4%4%4%4%2%4%6%6%2%5%3%4%

EFDE

663229314720122115112213321061Merseyside3%3%3%3%9%4%3%3%2%1%2%4%4%2%4%3%3%

MI

1859386882177036726172554476929179North West9%9%8%9%6%9%9%9%7%4%7%8%10%9%8%8%9%

17783949052061298223102861416119177Yorks & Humberside9%8%9%9%12%11%8%7%9%16%4%10%11%8%7%5%9%

HGGHBEGH

14476767561260386911201348286517152East Midlands7%7%7%7%15%6%8%10%7%8%8%4%9%5%8%5%7%

FEBDF

1849295920157843908292546567920187West Midlands9%9%9%9%1%8%10%11%9%5%12%9%8%11%10%5%9%

CB

89525263-33824437161127213618105Wales4%5%5%6%-2%5%6%4%5%7%4%5%4%4%5%5%

NLN

1848991103-116634927173629574930180South West9%9%9%10%-6%8%9%10%5%7%12%5%11%6%8%9%

HFEHCEFN

19996978222085479014162646647832192Eastern10%9%9%8%5%11%11%12%9%10%7%9%9%12%9%9%9%

GDN

23713212911152811042143123436805612674262London12%13%13%11%11%16%14%10%15%8%14%12%15%11%15%20%13%

JCBCIN


Table 20 (CONT.)

GO Region.Base: All respondents







27513914513732911443153203346511029276284South East13%14%14%14%7%16%14%11%16%14%14%16%9%19%11%21%14%

JFECBCDEI


Table 20 (CONT.)

GO Region.






177--2479816142323367121224Under £4,5001%1%--4%1%1%1%3%*1%*1%1%1%1%2%2%1%1%1%

RSMMMJMQS

6119--802723295212132331369712621880£4,500 - £6,4994%3%--13%4%3%4%10%3%2%*8%4%2%2%2%4%6%2%4%

RSMMKLMIIIICBCIkM*

6617--833117345117863513611810503383£6,500 - £7,4995%2%--14%5%2%5%10%4%1%1%9%5%2%3%2%3%5%3%4%

URSPOMLMLMIIIIIGIkMO*

6616--8226183741211823413751212443882£7,500 - £9,4995%2%--14%4%2%5%8%5%3%*8%5%2%1%3%4%4%4%4%

URSOMKLMIIHIIIFIJMo*

7726--10235343436262416341714161475845102£9,500 - £11,4996%4%--17%5%5%5%7%6%4%3%8%6%4%4%4%2%5%5%5%

RSMLMIIHIDIJMQs

7025--952732352518322131159131611435295£11,500 - £13,4995%4%--16%4%4%5%5%4%5%4%8%5%3%3%5%4%4%5%5%

RSIIIIQRS

4016--55161228191616479141267322455£13,500 - £15,4993%2%--9%3%2%4%4%4%3%1%2%3%4%3%2%2%3%2%3%

RSOKLMJNOQRS

5518--73192232142125131416101976363773£15,500 - £17,4994%3%--12%3%3%5%3%5%4%2%3%6%3%5%2%2%3%4%4%

RSHHHQRS

10055-155-495254313942412827152846116688155£17,500 - £24,9997%8%-56%-8%7%8%6%9%7%8%7%9%5%7%14%4%6%9%8%

SHFGIEHCCDEQRS

6853-121-414041173837291217222929136358121£25,000 - £29,9995%8%-44%-6%5%6%3%9%6%6%3%6%7%7%9%4%6%6%6%

USMMIIIIEILMQu

10071170--60565414476050718494240157397170£30,000 - £39,9997%10%37%--9%8%8%3%11%10%9%2%6%15%11%12%5%7%10%8%

USSMMMIHIHIHIEFGICBeGIL*


Table 21

HH Income.Base: All respondents






523890--2141285133538382824226375390£40,000 - £49,9994%6%20%--3%6%4%1%3%6%7%1%3%9%6%7%2%4%5%4%

SSMMLMIHIHIHIEFGCDGIJ*

6755122--32533751436665638422294776122£50,000 - £74,9995%8%27%--5%7%5%1%3%6%13%1%2%12%11%7%3%4%8%6%

USSMMKLMHIHIGHIEFGCBdFjL*

301848--718233293428121393202848£75,000 - £99,9992%3%10%--1%3%3%1%*2%6%1%3%4%3%3%1%2%3%2%

SSPKLMIIIIGIJLMPs

141125--2158-2419062105191725£100,000+1%2%6%--*2%1%-*1%4%*2%1%3%1%*1%2%1%

SSPKLMIIIFHFIJMO*

24496---126126887057103110956753594619184156340Refused18%14%---20%17%13%14%14%17%21%24%23%17%15%14%6%17%16%17%

OPLMHIHIHIEiDHjNPs

248138---11115711710878125756132334940170223162385Don't know18%20%---17%22%17%21%18%21%14%15%11%10%13%12%53%21%16%19%

OKMEiCBjOQs


Table 21 (CONT.)

HH Income.







2915915-176111256310424Under £4,5001%1%1%2%-*1%1%1%1%1%2%1%1%1%1%1%

1013644560318134261410211325680£4,500 - £6,4995%4%4%6%1%2%2%3%4%4%6%3%4%3%3%2%4%

NGBKN

100424157151921355611311439683£6,500 - £7,4995%4%4%6%2%3%2%5%4%3%2%4%6%3%5%2%4%

NECBEKN

97384356-12411453812321438982£7,500 - £9,4995%4%4%5%-*3%3%5%2%3%4%6%3%5%3%4%

NNEELN

107574568-23215569774127488102£9,500 - £11,4995%6%4%7%-1%4%4%6%6%3%2%8%5%6%2%5%

NNFGCBEFLN

100563954-834164877153021451695£11,500 - £13,4995%5%4%5%-4%4%4%5%5%3%5%5%4%5%4%5%

55342137-41410273610151323555£13,500 - £15,4993%3%2%4%-2%2%3%3%2%2%4%3%3%3%1%3%

NKN

79284538-33184131192419341073£15,500 - £17,4994%3%4%4%-2%4%2%4%2%4%3%4%4%4%3%4%

15474807321268247817182329475332155£17,500 - £24,9998%7%8%7%6%7%9%6%8%12%7%8%5%9%6%9%8%

HEE

11472496131147234916101530344725121£25,000 - £29,9996%7%5%6%6%6%6%6%5%12%4%5%5%7%6%7%6%

PHHHHOP

15381896111691427818183345386532170£30,000 - £39,9997%8%9%6%2%9%11%10%8%13%8%11%8%7%8%9%8%

NKN


Table 21 (CONT.)

HH Income.Base: All respondents







79444633-1146244074221429242090£40,000 - £49,9994%4%4%3%-6%6%6%4%5%2%8%3%6%3%6%4%

NGFEGCCEFGKN

107556723728624052472429524443122£50,000 - £74,9995%5%7%2%18%15%8%10%5%3%3%8%5%10%5%12%6%

NNLMNJGHEGHCBDGJn

442721361325142151121017111848£75,000 - £99,9992%3%2%*16%7%3%3%2%3%1%4%2%3%1%5%2%

NNLMNHGGCBCLMN

221015-681099-2381051325£100,000+1%1%1%-15%5%1%2%1%-1%1%2%2%1%4%1%

NMNLMNCBCLMN

349165175163123412655181175637829714465340Refused17%16%17%16%30%19%16%14%19%12%23%13%15%18%17%18%17%

NMJHGGFGIM

36018819721512114070154236642987517253385Don't know18%18%19%21%3%11%18%17%16%16%27%14%18%14%21%14%19%

NNMHGGGCBDGILn


Table 21 (CONT.)

HH Income.






73121852525184120152624331519693444085Daily Express5%2%4%2%4%4%3%6%4%4%4%5%8%5%6%2%3%1%4%4%4%

USRPOPIGHIGHIEGHIDFGIN*

19667723360851037643528782685254432622128135263Daily Mail14%10%16%12%10%13%14%11%8%12%15%15%17%18%17%11%8%7%12%14%13%

USOMMMGHIGHIFGHIDEGjM*

10743151362484557464247154121261922208169150The Mirror8%6%3%5%10%8%6%8%9%10%8%3%10%7%8%5%7%6%8%7%7%

RSOKLMGIIIFIJLM*

211446161133131444765737171835Daily Record2%2%1%2%3%**5%3%3%1%1%2%2%2%2%1%2%2%2%2%

SOPLMLMJlNq

882838172627602910114254442413191155462116Daily Telegraph6%4%8%6%4%4%8%4%2%3%7%10%11%8%4%5%3%1%5%6%6%

USPOLMKLMHIHIHIEiDEHqST

1868556136-213945-56552024Financial Times1%1%2%2%1%1%2%1%-*2%2%1%2%-1%2%1%*2%1%

OMLMLMHIGGGCBCGKLM

6923271917204824792253151812161318454792The Guardian5%3%6%7%3%3%7%3%1%2%4%10%4%6%4%4%4%6%4%5%4%

URSPOMKLMIHHJLMOs

73521--10-12732-33-3710The Herald (Glasgow)**1%1%*--1%-**1%1%1%-1%1%-*1%*

RSOPKLMHIGEHICJMqS

33161612912288321231541510510291948The Independent2%2%3%5%1%2%4%1%1%1%2%6%1%1%5%3%1%3%3%2%2%

RSPOLMKLMHIGGHIGIJLo*

551699189431978322522592329314071Metro4%2%2%3%3%1%6%3%1%2%5%5%1%1%2%2%7%9%3%4%3%

UPOPLMLMIHIFGHIFGHIDEGmO*

118821--18-161144363-71118The Scotsman1%1%2%1%*--3%-*1%2%1%1%1%1%1%-1%1%1%

SOPMKLMEiDJMqS


Table 22

Daily Newspaper Readership.Base: All respondents






311365151472320167-5376715123144Daily Star2%2%1%2%3%2%1%3%4%4%1%-1%1%2%1%2%5%1%3%2%

SPOLMKLMEiCBdHJo

1821204239107115821051151026322413448505178141161302The Sun13%18%9%14%18%18%11%15%23%24%11%4%10%12%15%13%15%24%13%16%15%

USSPOLMKLMIIEiCDHmOq*

81354613153462208745572318112418225759116The Times6%5%10%5%3%5%9%3%2%2%8%11%6%6%4%6%5%7%5%6%6%

SRSPOPLMKLMHGGGJoQS

2917912121426548181574416113212445Evening Standard2%2%2%5%2%2%4%1%1%2%3%3%2%1%1%4%3%1%2%2%2%

SRPOPMMMGHIGHEFDFMNOR

120643421545642866339404143252227283910183184Other9%9%8%8%9%9%6%12%12%9%7%8%11%9%7%7%8%12%10%8%9%

POPMLMMIIEFGHDKMNO

527300186116248270296261224167246191129104134183155124446381827None of these38%44%41%42%42%42%41%38%44%40%42%36%32%36%42%47%47%39%42%38%40%

UPKMHIGHIHIEFICEFHjM*

263103126576486180992531123187876649694550179186365QUALITY19%15%28%21%11%14%25%14%5%7%21%35%21%23%15%18%14%16%17%19%18%

USRSPOMLMKLMHIHHIHIEHqST

572253148100261257268300230201231163177114136124130144407418825POPULAR42%37%32%36%44%40%37%44%45%48%39%31%44%40%42%32%39%45%38%42%40%

URSOLMKLMGHIFEFCDFIJL*

262809038841071201145967112104986472493425170171342MID MARKET PRESS19%12%20%14%14%17%17%17%12%16%19%20%24%22%22%13%10%8%16%17%17%

USSMMLMGHIGHIFGHIDjMQSu

3021666054177161121187174147108408755737475104223245469RED TOP PRESS22%25%13%19%30%25%17%27%34%35%18%7%22%19%23%19%23%33%21%25%23%

SRSPOLMKLMEiCDFHJo*


Table 22 (CONT.)

Daily Newspaper Readership.







9047384316342633411101737851285Daily Express4%5%4%4%2%4%4%6%3%2%5%3%3%7%10%3%4%

JEFHCCDJ

280125138112531112601252429304111226334263Daily Mail14%12%13%11%11%17%14%15%13%17%12%10%7%21%32%9%13%

NNHGHEFGCBCDELN

158747686185228737211862181506150The Mirror8%7%7%8%2%4%6%7%8%5%9%6%11%3%18%2%7%

NNNHFHEFGCBCDEL

42201519121441666413235335Daily Record2%2%1%2%2%1%2%1%2%4%3%1%2%*4%1%2%

HEGHCCDH

12349674822243215651016126823116116Daily Telegraph6%5%7%5%6%12%5%5%6%4%4%5%2%13%3%32%6%

PNLFGEFGHCBCDEL

231311225168833258112424Financial Times1%1%1%*4%2%2%2%1%2%1%1%1%1%1%7%1%

NNNJCBJKLMN

854745271164813605822358139292The Guardian4%5%4%3%2%9%6%3%6%3%3%8%6%2%2%25%4%

MNNJGHGHEFGCBfIKLN

12642224-73312-41010The Herald (Glasgow)1%1%**5%1%*-1%2%1%**-1%3%*

NMNMJHHEFGHCBDHJMN

42262311-12268265220106154848The Independent2%3%2%1%-6%3%2%3%4%1%7%2%1%2%13%2%

MNLNHGFFHCBDFGK*

58353625-9381237512162111712371Metro3%3%4%2%-5%5%3%4%4%5%5%4%2%9%6%3%

NNEFGCBCDFKN

2181036275102226441818The Scotsman1%1%1%*15%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%5%1%

NMNMNCBMN


Table 22 (CONT.)








44251929131052146414744344Daily Star2%2%2%3%3%2%1%1%2%3%2%1%3%1%5%1%2%

NECBCKN

3071501511722911765117224620976730216302The Sun15%15%15%17%5%5%15%16%12%16%19%7%18%13%37%5%15%

NNLMJGHFEFGCBCEgI*

10759572172660196171120333536116116The Times5%6%6%2%16%14%8%5%6%5%5%7%6%7%4%32%6%

NNLMNCBCKLMN

4120251216259263421710451345Evening Standard2%2%2%1%4%4%3%2%3%2%1%1%3%2%5%4%2%

NNFCBCFKN

19691939861266368414212464395616184Other10%9%9%10%14%7%8%9%9%10%8%8%12%7%7%4%9%

MFECBCE

803415412449106030114739760101127204181--827None of these39%41%40%44%26%33%38%37%41%42%42%43%37%34%--40%

NNMNJFFGHBdJLn

3561771891071771167652002132719011983365365QUALITY17%17%18%11%41%39%21%16%21%15%13%24%17%23%10%100%18%

NNLMNJGHFEGHCBdFGI*

8494124134171261326180363591039122923682583825POPULAR41%40%40%41%29%34%41%45%37%41%42%31%42%45%100%23%40%

NNLMJGHFFCBdFIJL

362167175151536145831552737405614834244342MID MARKET PRESS18%16%17%15%13%20%18%21%16%19%15%14%10%28%41%12%17%

NNJHGHEFGHCBCDEJN

485237232265522171932003467411618846925469RED TOP PRESS24%23%23%26%12%12%22%23%21%24%28%14%30%17%57%7%23%

NNLNGHFEGHCBgILn


Table 22 (CONT.)







73121852525184120152624331519693444085Daily Express5%2%4%2%4%4%3%6%4%4%4%5%8%5%6%2%3%1%4%4%4%

UOGHIIGHIDFINO*

19667723360851037643528782685254432622128135263Daily Mail14%10%16%12%10%13%14%11%8%12%15%15%17%18%17%11%8%7%12%14%13%

USMMGHIGHIFGHIDEGiM*

10743151362484557464247154121261922208169150The Mirror8%6%3%5%10%8%6%8%9%10%8%3%10%7%8%5%7%6%8%7%7%

RSKLMIIJLQS

211446161133131444765737171835Daily Record2%2%1%2%3%**5%3%3%1%1%2%2%2%2%1%2%2%2%2%

SOPLMLMJlNq

882838172627602910114254442413191155462116Daily Telegraph6%4%8%6%4%4%8%4%2%3%7%10%11%8%4%5%3%1%5%6%6%

USPOLMLMHIIHIFGHIDHjLM*

1868556136-213945-56552024Financial Times1%1%2%2%1%1%2%1%-*2%2%1%2%-1%2%1%*2%1%

LMMHGGGCBCGKM

6923271917204824792253151812161318454792The Guardian5%3%6%7%3%3%7%3%1%2%4%10%4%6%4%4%4%6%4%5%4%

RSPOMKLMJLMOQ

73521--10-12732-33-3710The Herald (Glasgow)**1%1%*--1%-**1%1%1%-1%1%-*1%*

SOPLMJNOP

33161612912288321231541510510291948The Independent2%2%3%5%1%2%4%1%1%1%2%6%1%1%5%3%1%3%3%2%2%

RSPOKLMHIGGJLoR

551699189431978322522592329314071Metro4%2%2%3%3%1%6%3%1%2%5%5%1%1%2%2%7%9%3%4%3%

POLMLMIFGHIFGHIDEGiK*

118821--18-161144363-71118The Scotsman1%1%2%1%*--3%-*1%2%1%1%1%1%1%-1%1%1%

SOPMLMFHJMNOPQ


Table 23







311365151472320167-5376715123144Daily Star2%2%1%2%3%2%1%3%4%4%1%-1%1%2%1%2%5%1%3%2%

OLMKLMFHICBdJLo

1821204239107115821051151026322413448505178141161302The Sun13%18%9%14%18%18%11%15%23%24%11%4%10%12%15%13%15%24%13%16%15%

USSPOLMKLMIIEiDImOq*

81354613153462208745572318112418225759116The Times6%5%10%5%3%5%9%3%2%2%8%11%6%6%4%6%5%7%5%6%6%

SSPOPLMLMJoQS

2917912121426548181574416113212445Evening Standard2%2%2%5%2%2%4%1%1%2%3%3%2%1%1%4%3%1%2%2%2%

ROPMMGHEFFMNOR

120643421545642866339404143252227283910183184Other9%9%8%8%9%9%6%12%12%9%7%8%11%9%7%7%8%12%10%8%9%

POPMMFGDKMNO

527300186116248270296261224167246191129104134183155124446381827None of these38%44%41%42%42%42%41%38%44%40%42%36%32%36%42%47%47%39%42%38%40%

UMIHIHIEFIEFIJTU


Table 23 (CONT.)








9047384316342633411101737851285Daily Express4%5%4%4%2%4%4%6%3%2%5%3%3%7%10%3%4%

JEFHCCDJ

280125138112531112601252429304111226334263Daily Mail14%12%13%11%11%17%14%15%13%17%12%10%7%21%32%9%13%

NNGHEFGCBCDEN

158747686185228737211862181506150The Mirror8%7%7%8%2%4%6%7%8%5%9%6%11%3%18%2%7%

FHEGCBCDE

42201519121441666413235335Daily Record2%2%1%2%2%1%2%1%2%4%3%1%2%*4%1%2%

EGHCCDH

12349674822243215651016126823116116Daily Telegraph6%5%7%5%6%12%5%5%6%4%4%5%2%13%3%32%6%

NLFEFGHCBCDEL

231311225168833258112424Financial Times1%1%1%*4%2%2%2%1%2%1%1%1%1%1%7%1%

NNNCBKN

854745271164813605822358139292The Guardian4%5%4%3%2%9%6%3%6%3%3%8%6%2%2%25%4%

NNJGEFCBfIKLN

12642224-73312-41010The Herald (Glasgow)1%1%**5%1%*-1%2%1%**-1%3%*

NNMGHCBDHM

42262311-12268265220106154848The Independent2%3%2%1%-6%3%2%3%4%1%7%2%1%2%13%2%

NLNGFFHCBDFLN

58353625-9381237512162111712371Metro3%3%4%2%-5%5%3%4%4%5%5%4%2%9%6%3%

NFGBCDKN

2181036275102226441818The Scotsman1%1%1%*15%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%5%1%

NMMCBMN


Table 23 (CONT.)








44251929131052146414744344Daily Star2%2%2%3%3%2%1%1%2%3%2%1%3%1%5%1%2%

NCBCKN

3071501511722911765117224620976730216302The Sun15%15%15%17%5%5%15%16%12%16%19%7%18%13%37%5%15%

NLJGHFEFGCBCEgI*

10759572172660196171120333536116116The Times5%6%6%2%16%14%8%5%6%5%5%7%6%7%4%32%6%

NNLNCBCKLMN

4120251216259263421710451345Evening Standard2%2%2%1%4%4%3%2%3%2%1%1%3%2%5%4%2%

NNFBCKN

19691939861266368414212464395616184Other10%9%9%10%14%7%8%9%9%10%8%8%12%7%7%4%9%

EBCE

803415412449106030114739760101127204181--827None of these39%41%40%44%26%33%38%37%41%42%42%43%37%34%--40%

NNNFBCDLN


Table 23 (CONT.)







1094466222349693612174778264435351036985154Activist (5+ activities)8%7%15%8%4%8%9%5%2%4%8%15%6%15%11%9%3%1%7%9%8%

SRSOLMKLMIIHFGHFGHIDEGHJ*

2181031165672951111154548107121595668734421152169321Semi-Activist (3 or 416%15%25%20%12%15%15%17%9%11%18%23%15%19%21%19%13%7%14%17%16%activities)

RSLMLMIGHEiDGJLM*

10455292731974984935475354503574373303191892182762772968377381575Non-Activist (0-2 activities)76%78%60%71%84%77%75%78%89%85%74%62%79%65%68%72%84%93%79%74%77%

SRSLMKLMIIIFGHEiCBhJLM*


Table 24

Act2.Level of activismBase: All respondents







1547084476396137821293336563250154Activist (5+ activities)8%7%8%5%14%22%8%9%8%8%4%11%7%11%4%14%8%

NNLNGFEGCBdFGLN

31616116012412451376816927146380114123101321Semi-Activist (3 or 415%16%16%12%30%25%17%17%17%19%6%21%15%22%15%28%16%activities)

NNLNHGFGEGCBDFGLn

158079078484323975962967171032181964293546702151575Non-Activist (0-2 activities)77%77%76%83%56%53%75%74%74%73%90%67%79%68%81%59%77%

NNLMNHGFGEGCBdFGI*


Table 24 (CONT.)

Act2.Level of activismBase: All respondents






38613814681124170215139868616918214191101876144272252524Conservative28%20%32%29%21%27%30%20%17%20%29%34%35%31%31%23%18%14%26%25%26%

URSOPLMLMGHIGHIFGHIDEGjL*

3352101065919916716021815512115511311279711188679276269545Labour24%31%23%21%34%26%22%32%31%29%26%21%28%27%22%31%26%25%26%27%27%

URSOPLMGJMoQR*

2058795387974118100445984104454263435841156136292Liberal Democrats (Lib Dem)15%13%21%14%13%12%16%15%9%14%14%20%11%15%20%11%18%13%15%14%14%

SSPMMKLMIGFIGGIJMPS

268135105128101095974851132235Scottish/Welsh Nationalist2%1%3%2%2%1%*4%2%2%1%1%2%2%1%2%2%*1%2%2%

OPHICDNO

211581181013126810112271275191635Green Party1%2%2%4%1%2%2%2%1%2%2%2%1%1%2%3%2%2%2%2%2%

RHIIR

13127538123478544471581624UK Independence Party1%2%2%2%*1%2%1%1%2%1%1%1%1%1%2%*2%1%2%1%

ROCNQ

3612612151613202489768108710183048Other3%2%1%4%2%2%2%3%5%2%2%1%1%3%3%2%2%3%2%3%2%

SMMMCMR

165103343786949777107596735342129576760136132268Would not vote12%15%7%13%15%15%13%11%21%14%11%7%8%7%9%15%20%19%13%13%13%

SSMMKLMGHIGHIGHIDEGjMS

1647832276081847761586855422926393769136106242Undecided12%12%7%10%10%13%12%11%12%14%11%10%10%10%8%10%11%22%13%11%12%

EiDGS

22148-811131210610111076635231336Refused2%2%2%-1%2%2%2%2%1%2%2%2%2%2%2%1%2%2%1%2%

SR


Table 25

QPol1/2. Combined VotingBase: All respondents







536249275239771200116240----524236119524Conservative26%24%27%24%17%39%25%29%25%----100%29%32%26%

MNLEFGHBhL

5542782662781242210100261---545-22990545Labour27%27%26%27%29%23%26%25%27%---100%-28%25%27%

FGHDEFGH

28613915412492912746172--292--9171292Liberal Democrats (Lib Dem)14%14%15%12%23%16%16%12%18%--100%--11%20%14%

NJGHCBiN

401916201212101235----19435Scottish/Welsh Nationalist2%2%2%2%2%1%2%3%1%24%----2%1%2%

HHHHDEFGH

34241113111962235----8835Green Party2%2%1%1%3%1%2%2%2%25%----1%2%2%

PHHHHChOP

23101413--1171124----9424UK Independence Party1%1%1%1%--1%2%1%17%----1%1%1%

HHHHDEFH

45183027-318112148----23548Other2%2%3%3%-2%2%3%2%34%----3%1%2%

HHHHDEFGH

2541561131607128650117-----9128268Would not vote12%15%11%16%16%7%11%12%12%-----11%8%13%

PNNBhKLNp

241111131124417974796-242---10332242Undecided12%11%13%12%9%9%12%12%10%-100%---12%9%12%

HDEFGHI

37171915-414717-----17436Refused2%2%2%1%-2%2%2%2%-----2%1%2%

DEFG


Table 25 (CONT.)

QPol1/2. Combined VotingBase: All respondents






6863422391292873213663412562083072572001531472081661535195091028With tax preamble50%50%52%47%48%50%50%50%50%49%52%49%49%53%46%54%50%48%49%51%50%

G

6873352171463063163603462512142842722051361741761651675394831022No tax preamble50%50%48%53%52%50%50%50%50%51%48%51%51%47%54%46%50%52%51%49%50%

G


Table 26

AirTax version.Base: All respondents







1021-102852126102370207489701311542662754131891028With tax preamble50%-100%51%63%56%47%52%51%49%54%53%49%53%50%52%50%

PLKOP

10291022-4941579424194479721111392782494121771022No tax preamble50%100%-49%37%44%53%48%49%51%46%47%51%47%50%48%50%

PLKOP


Table 26 (CONT.)

AirTax version.Base: All respondents



air travel tax surveystopstanstedexpansion.com/documents/mori_air_travel_poll_tables.pdf · gender...

Documents