allison littlejohn & anoush margaryan caledonian academy glasgow caledonian university, uk
TRANSCRIPT
Allison Littlejohn & Anoush MargaryanCaledonian AcademyGlasgow Caledonian University, UK
work & learning
Personalised
Social
Continual
Redefined relationships
Self-regulated
Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013) Technology-Enhanced Professional Learning: Processes, Practices, and Tools. Routledge
work trends
• agency transferring from people to systems• producer and consumer of data may be the
same person • new forms of governance of data present
issues around how individuals and organisations learn from incidents
What are effective ‘knowledge-governing practices’ in relation to LFI?
technology trends
• data tracking becomes part of daily practice• analytics based on metrics and ontologies• bottom up systems based on sematic web technologies • top down systems designed around organisational view
of knowledge and data• bottom up knowledge production at odds with top
down structured activities
How can technologies support knowledge governance to improve learning from incidents?
learning trends
• LFI links different people with different epistemic cultures and values
• Knowledge/ data interpreted and analysed in different ways
• LFI knowledge governance can be viewed as a ‘judgment’ rather than developmental process
What unit of analysis of learning can improve LFI?
• What are effective ‘knowledge-governing practices’ in relation to LFI?
• How can technologies support knowledge governance to improve learning from incidents?
• What unit of analysis of learning can improve LFI?
questions
tensions and ambiguities
• Our framing of LFI shapes each learning event.• LFI is both top down and bottom up (whether we
recognize this or not).• LFI may embody a process of ‘judgement’ that
shapes the outcome (i.e. ‘political’ considerations influence the process).
• LFI activities tend to focus on cognitive aspects of learning, but sensemaking involves other factors.
“employees, and the organisation as a whole, seek to understand any negative safety events that have taken place (for example, an
explosion in a refinery furnace) to prevent similar future events” Lukic, 2012, p. 12.
learning from incidents
LFI Engage Framework
LFI Engage Process Model
LFI-Engage Toolkit
LFI Process
LFIQ
LFI Guidelines
Engagement Workshops
The LFI Process Model helps companies map their current LFI initiatives against the phases of effective LFI and identify potential gaps. The LFI Process Model includes six main phases of LFI: Reporting, Investigating, Developing incident alerts, Disseminating, Contextualising and Implementing actions. The model helps frontline and safety managers integrate all LFI initiatives in ways that support learning throughout LFI.
LFIQ (Learning from Incidents Questionnaire) helps companies diagnose the quality of their LFI practices and processes by measuring employee perceptions. The results of LFIQ can help frontline managers , supervisors and safety managers identify which areas to prioritise to make LFI as effective as possible.
LFI Guidelines can be used by frontline managers, supervisors and safety managers to improve the local work environment and LFI processes and practices. The LFI Guidelines are organised around each of the phases of the LFI Process Model.
Engagement workshops are workshop-style activities that can help engage employees with leaning from incidents and create an opportunity for making sense of incident information and relating it to the employees’ own work.
LFI-Engage Questionnaire
LFI-Engage Guidelines
LFI-Engage Actvities
Unit of analysis of learning
system
network
community
individual
system: activity theory
system: activity theory
community: trialogical learning
monological dialogical trialogical
community: situated learning
individual: self –regulated learning
Forethought
PerformanceSelf-reflection
Forethought Performance Self-reflectionTask analysis Goal setting Strategic planningSelf-motivation belief Self-efficacy Task interest/value
Self-control Task strategies Elaboration Critical Thinking Help seeking Interest enhancement
Self-judgement Self-evaluationSelf-reaction Self-satisfaction/affect
focuses on immediate task, sets goals with others, networks internally
looks beyond immediate task, sets own goals, networks internally & externally
answer questions SRL score feedback
individual: self –regulated learning
network: actor network theory
system
network
community
individual
theoretical framing of LFI?
Allison Littlejohn & Anoush MargaryanCaledonian AcademyGlasgow Caledonian University, UK