american indian/alaska native epidemiological profile

16
American Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile Jennifer Kawatu, RN, MPH November 9, 2011 www.jsi.com

Upload: melora

Post on 23-Feb-2016

47 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

American Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile. Jennifer Kawatu , RN, MPH November 9, 2011. Background. National Chlamydia rates for men and women 2009. 4.5 X. National Objective of IPP Infrastructure: Epidemiological Profile of American Indian/Native Alaskans . White. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

American Indian/Alaska Native

Epidemiological Profile

Jennifer Kawatu, RN, MPHNovember 9, 2011

www.jsi.com

Page 2: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

Background

National Objective of IPP Infrastructure:

Epidemiological Profile of American Indian/Native Alaskans

4.5 X

Sources: For men and women, 15 and older, in US and outlying areas.US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention (NCHSTP), Division of STD/HIV Prevention, Sexually Transmitted Disease Morbidity for selected STDs by age, race/ethnicity and gender 1996-2009, CDC WONDER On-line Database, June 2011. Accessed at http://wonder.cdc.gov/std-std-race-age.html on Oct 5, 2011 1:35:43 PM

National Chlamydia rates for men and women 2009

American Indian / Alaska Native

White

Page 3: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

American Indians/Alaska Nativesin Region I

• AI/AN make up less than 1% of population in Region I ( ~ 0.3%)

• 560 Federally recognized tribes

• Many others with state or no official recognition

• American Indians from all over the country live in Region I

All other races- 99%

American Indians/Alaska Natives

<1%

Source: Census, 2010.

Page 4: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

Green=Densest AI/AN populations in rural areas

Region I AI/AN Population Density

Source: U.S. Census

Page 5: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

Socioeconomics

AI/AN more likely than Whites to:• Live in poverty • Have lower

median family incomes

• Have fewer years of education

• Be Younger

Page 6: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

History

• AI/AN population, has a distinct history with the federal government

• Snyder Act of 1921 led to development of Indian Health Service (IHS) – IHS serves almost 2 million members of the 564

federally recognized AI/AN tribes. • IHS Direct Care• Tribally Managed Services• Tribal Services• Urban Indian Health Programs

Page 7: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

AI/AN Health Care Management Systems by State

State Funding Sources FacilitiesCT Federal and tribal Federally funded Indian Health Service primary care

facility; tribal insurances; tribal contract care services; tribally managed

MA Federal (may also be some tribal funding)

Federally funded Indian Health Service primary care facility; tribal contract care services; tribally managed

ME Federal, state, and private

Federally funded Indian Health Service primary care facilities that are tribally managed; tribal contract care services

NH State and private funding

Non-profit education and prevention programs

RI Federal Federally funded Indian Health Service primary care facility; tribal contract care services; tribally managed

VT NA NA

Page 8: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

Cultural

• Contracted with Medical Anthropologist with extensive experience working with native population in Northeast to conduct KII

• Between Feb-May, 2011 conducted 7 interviews with residents of all six states

• Purpose of interviews to identify:– Barriers to care– Perceptions and beliefs about STI/Family planning care– Opportunities to partner with IPP

Page 9: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

Cross Regional Messages from KIIs

• Transportation challenges for rural and youth populations

• Fears of breached confidentiality may affect utilization choices

• Concerns of perceived illness connected to stigma, socio-cultural prejudice, and racism may incline individuals to not identify as Natives among non-Natives.

• Concerns about identity may alter the use of non-Native STD services. Both of these situations can and do skew associated statistics.

Page 10: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

Cross Regional Messages from KIIs

• Appropriate messaging must be culturally relevant and competent. – Messengers gender and tribal specific– Consider Message technology, methods of

dissemination, and literacy levels. – More rural, older and northern populations tend to

emphasize personal oral transmission of knowledge and information.

• Southern, as opposed to urban, communities may have greater access to education through smart phones and internet technologies.

Page 11: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

AI/AN Served By Region I IPP(2005-2009)

Estimated Number of Female AI/AN 15-24 3467

Average number reached per year 84

Estimated % of AI/AN Female 15-24 Population Reached 2%

Page 12: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

Chlamydia Positivity among AI/AN

Age Breakdown by State Percent Positive (Number) Total Tested

24/25 and Younger**5.5 (23) 421

25/26 and Older3.3 (4) 121

Total 5.0 (27) 542

Percent Positive for Chlamydia among AI/AN* IPP Females Region I 2005-2009

*Includes AI/AN only or AI/AN along with another race

Page 13: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

Region I Chlamydia Positivity Rates in Women 24/25 and Younger by Race (2005-2009)

Page 14: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

Conclusions

• AI/AN populations in Region I are small and very diverse group

• AI/AN make up less than 1% of population in general, and less than 1% of population tested for Chlamydia

• Reaching 2% of AI/AN in the under 24/25 age group – room to expand

Page 15: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

Conclusions Cont.

If funds and personnel available improve outreach to AI/AN:

• Have additional conversations with tribal health contacts to elicit culturally specific message content.

• Collaborate with tribal health leaders to disseminate messages using locally specific approaches.

E.g. Project Red Talon in Oregon • Timelines should consider time to build

relationships with AI/AN organizations

http://www.npaihb.org/epicenter/project/project_red_talon/

Page 16: American  Indian/Alaska Native Epidemiological Profile

Conclusions Cont.

• Non-Native facilities should actively train staff about perceived discrimination and its impact on Native clients.

• Media messages should address both genders and a variety of ages. Multi-generational audiences might encourage other participants to actively engage in education.

• Messages should “normalize” and de-stigmatize prevention and screening services and education.