among the most important innovations brought by the 1996 protocol is the codification of the

Upload: enviro-chemist

Post on 06-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Among the Most Important Innovations Brought by the 1996 Protocol is the Codification of The

    1/1

    Among the most important innovations brought by the 1996 Protocol is the codification

    of the "precautionary approach" and the "polluter pays principle." Reflecting these

    principles, the Protocol embodies a major structural revision of the Convention -- the so-called "reverse list" approach. Now, instead of prohibiting the dumping of certain (listed)

    hazardous materials, the Parties are obligated to prohibit the dumping of any waste or

    other matter that is not listed in Annex 1 ("the reverse list") of the 1996 Protocol.Dumping of wastes or other matter on this reverse list requires a permit. Parties to the

    Protocol are further obligated to adopt measures to ensure that the issuance of permits

    and permit conditions for the dumping of reverse list substances comply with Annex 2(the Waste Assessment Annex) of the Protocol. The substances on the reverse list include

    dredged material; sewagesludge; industrialfish processing waste; vessels and offshore

    platforms or other man-made structures at sea; inert, inorganic geological material;

    organic material of natural origin; and bulky items including iron, steel, concrete andsimilar materials for which the concern is physical impact, and limited to those

    circumstances where such wastes are generated at locations with no land-disposal

    alternatives. In addition, the 1996 protocol prohibits altogether the practice of

    incineration at sea, except for emergencies, and prohibits the exports of wastes or othermatter to non-Parties for the purpose of dumping or incineration at sea

    Management Options 3.3 Where the characteristics of the dredged material are such

    that its disposal would not meet the requirements of the Convention, treatment or other

    management options should be considered. These options can be used to reduce or

    control impacts to a level that will not constitute an unacceptable risk to human health, orharm living resources, damage amenities or interfere with legitimate uses of the sea. 3.4

    Treatment, such as separation of contaminated fractions, can make the material suitable

    for a beneficial use and should be considered before opting for sea disposal. Disposalmanagement techniques include placement on or burial in the sea floor followed by clean

    sediment capping, utilization of geo-chemical interactions and transformations ofsubstances in dredged material when combined with sea water or bottom sediment,selection of special sites such as abiotic zones, or methods of containing dredged material

    in a stable manner.

    3.5 A permit to dump wastes or other matter shall be refused if the permitting authority

    determines that appropriate opportunities exist to re-use, recycle or treat the waste

    without undue risks to human health or the environment or disproportionate costs. The

    practical availability of other means of disposal should be considered in the light of acomparative risk assessment involving both dumping and the alternatives.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sewagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sludgehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sludgehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish_processinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish_processinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sewagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sludgehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish_processing