among the most important innovations brought by the 1996 protocol is the codification of the
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Among the Most Important Innovations Brought by the 1996 Protocol is the Codification of The
1/1
Among the most important innovations brought by the 1996 Protocol is the codification
of the "precautionary approach" and the "polluter pays principle." Reflecting these
principles, the Protocol embodies a major structural revision of the Convention -- the so-called "reverse list" approach. Now, instead of prohibiting the dumping of certain (listed)
hazardous materials, the Parties are obligated to prohibit the dumping of any waste or
other matter that is not listed in Annex 1 ("the reverse list") of the 1996 Protocol.Dumping of wastes or other matter on this reverse list requires a permit. Parties to the
Protocol are further obligated to adopt measures to ensure that the issuance of permits
and permit conditions for the dumping of reverse list substances comply with Annex 2(the Waste Assessment Annex) of the Protocol. The substances on the reverse list include
dredged material; sewagesludge; industrialfish processing waste; vessels and offshore
platforms or other man-made structures at sea; inert, inorganic geological material;
organic material of natural origin; and bulky items including iron, steel, concrete andsimilar materials for which the concern is physical impact, and limited to those
circumstances where such wastes are generated at locations with no land-disposal
alternatives. In addition, the 1996 protocol prohibits altogether the practice of
incineration at sea, except for emergencies, and prohibits the exports of wastes or othermatter to non-Parties for the purpose of dumping or incineration at sea
Management Options 3.3 Where the characteristics of the dredged material are such
that its disposal would not meet the requirements of the Convention, treatment or other
management options should be considered. These options can be used to reduce or
control impacts to a level that will not constitute an unacceptable risk to human health, orharm living resources, damage amenities or interfere with legitimate uses of the sea. 3.4
Treatment, such as separation of contaminated fractions, can make the material suitable
for a beneficial use and should be considered before opting for sea disposal. Disposalmanagement techniques include placement on or burial in the sea floor followed by clean
sediment capping, utilization of geo-chemical interactions and transformations ofsubstances in dredged material when combined with sea water or bottom sediment,selection of special sites such as abiotic zones, or methods of containing dredged material
in a stable manner.
3.5 A permit to dump wastes or other matter shall be refused if the permitting authority
determines that appropriate opportunities exist to re-use, recycle or treat the waste
without undue risks to human health or the environment or disproportionate costs. The
practical availability of other means of disposal should be considered in the light of acomparative risk assessment involving both dumping and the alternatives.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sewagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sludgehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sludgehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish_processinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish_processinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sewagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sludgehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish_processing