big data berlin – automating decisions is the next frontier for big data

Post on 12-Jan-2015

858 Views

Category:

Software

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Just collecting, storing and analyzing data is not enough. In order to benefit from it, you have to overcome organizational and human inertia and establish automated processes that use insights gained from your data. This presentation has been presented at http://dataconomy.com/28-august-2014-big-data-berlin/

TRANSCRIPT

A U T O M AT I N G D E C I S I O N S – T H E N E X T F R O N T I E R F O R B I G D ATA

L A R S T R I E L O F F – B L U E Y O N D E R – I ’ M @ T R I E L O F F O N T W I T T E R

T H E F R O N T I E RW H A T N O B O D Y T E L L S Y O U A B O U T

W H O I S U S I N G B I G D ATA T O D AY

W H E R E B I G D ATA I S U S E D

Effective Use

Marketing

Finance

Everyone Else

S O U R C E : O W N , P O T E N T I A L LY B I A S E D O B S E R VAT I O N S

W H E R E B I G D ATA I S U S E D

Potential Use

Marketing

Finance

Everyone Else

S O U R C E : O W N , P O T E N T I A L LY B I A S E D O B S E R VAT I O N S

Better Decisions

Faster Data

More Data

T H R E E A P P R O A C H E S

M O R E D ATAD I G I TA L M A R K E T I N G ’ S A P P R O A C H :

FA S T E R D ATAF I N A N C E ’ S A P P R O A C H

B U T W H AT A B O U T B E T T E R D E C I S I O N S ?

Physiological

Safety

Love/Belonging

Esteem

Self-Actualization

Collection

Storage

Analysis

Prediction

Decision

Collection

Storage

Analysis

Prediction

Decision

Physiological

Safety

Love/Belonging

Esteem

Self-Actualization

“… all others bring data.” !

— W. E D W A R D S D E M I N G

H O W D ATA - D R I V E N D E C I S I O N S S H O U L D W O R K

C O M P U T E R C O L L E C T S

C O M P U T E R S T O R E S

H U M A N A N A LY Z E S

H U M A N P R E D I C T S

H U M A N D E C I D E S

H O W D ATA - D R I V E N D E C I S I O N S R E A L LY W O R K

C O M P U T E R C O L L E C T S

C O M P U T E R S T O R E S

H U M A N A N A LY Z E S

C O M M U N I C AT I O N B R E A K D O W N

H U M A N D E C I D E S

C O M M U N I C AT I O N B R E A K D O W N

Communication Breakdown, It's always the same, I'm having a nervous breakdown, Drive me insane!

— L E D Z E P P E L I N

• Drill-down analysis … misunderstood or distorted• Metrics dashboards … contradictory and confusing• Monthly reports … ignored after two iterations• In-house analyst teams … overworked and powerless

H O W D ATA - D R I V E N D E C I S I O N S R E A L LY W O R K

H T T P : / / D I L B E R T. C O M / S T R I P S / C O M I C / 2 0 0 7 - 0 5 - 1 6 /

H O W D E C I S I O N S R E A L LY S H O U L D W O R K

C O M P U T E R C O L L E C T S

C O M P U T E R S T O R E S

C O M P U T E R A N A LY Z E S

C O M P U T E R P R E D I C T S

C O M P U T E R D E C I D E S

99.9% of all business decisions can be automated

H O W D E C I S I O N S A R E M A D E

Human Decisions

Business Rules

No Decision, Decision-by-default

B U S I N E S S R U L E S = P R O G R A M M I N G

• Business rules are like programs – written by non-programmers

• Business rules can be contradictory, incomplete, and complex beyond comprehension

• Business rules have no built-in feedback mechanism: “It is the rule, because it is the rule”

H U M A N D E C I S I O N M A K I N G

• • System 1: Fast, automatic, frequent, emotional, stereotypic, subconscious

• • System 2: Slow, effortful, infrequent, logical, calculating, conscious

D A N I E L K A H N E M A N N , T H I N K I N G FA S T A N D S L O W

H O W T O D E C I D E FA S TF R E Q U E N T D E C I S I O N M A K I N G M E A N S FA S T D E C I S I O N M A K I N G , M E A N S U S I N G H E U R I S T I C S O R C O G N I T I V E B I A S E S

Anchoring effect

IKEA effect

Confirmation bias

Bandwagon effect

Substitution

Availability heuristic Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy

Rhyme as reason effect

Over-justification effect

Zero-risk bias

Framing effect

Illusory correlationSunk cost fallacy

Overconfidence

Outcome bias

Inattentional Blindness

Benjamin Franklin effect

Hindsight bias

Gambler’s fallacy

Anecdotal evidenceNegativity bias

Loss aversion

Backfire effect

H O W C O M P U T E R S D E C I D E FA S TM A C H I N E L E A R N I N G O F F E R S A N A LT E R N A T I V E T O H U M A N C O G N I T I V E B I A S E S A N D C A N B E M A D E FA S T T H R O U G H B I G D A TA

K-Means Clustering

Naive BayesSupport Vector Machines Affinity Propagation

Least Angle Regression

Nearest Neighbors

Decision Trees

Markov Chain Monte Carlo

Spectral clustering

Restricted Bolzmann Machines

Logistic Regression

Better decisions through predictive applications

H O W P R E D I C T I V E A P P L I C AT I O N S W O R K

C O L L E C T & S T O R E

A N A LY Z E C O R R E L AT I O N S

B U I L D D E C I S I O N M O D E L

D E C I D E & T E S T O P T I M I Z E

W H Y T E S T ?

– R A N D A L L M U N R O E

“Correlation doesn’t imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing ‘look

over there’”

S T O R Y T I M E(Not safe for vegetarians)

T H E G R O U N D B E E F D I L E M M A

T H E G R O U N D B E E F D I L E M M A

Yesterday Today Tomorrow Next Delivery Next Day

In Stock Demand

T H E G R O U N D B E E F D I L E M M A

• Order too much and you will have to throw meat away when it goes bad. You lose money and cows die in vain

• Order too little and you won’t serve all your potential customers. You lose money and customers stay hungry.

A C C U R AT E LY P R E D I C T D E M A N DC H A L L E N G E # 1

A U T O M AT E R E P L E N I S H M E N TC H A L L E N G E # 2

C O L L E C T S T O C K A N D

S A L E S

P R E D I C T D E M A N D

T R A D E O F F C O S T S

C R E AT E O R D E R S I N E R P

S Y S T E M

O P T I M I Z E & R E P E AT

@ B YA N A LY T I C S _ E N @ T R I E L O F F

top related