module 1 water framework directive, relation of wfd with daughter directives, river basin management...

MODULE 1Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management

Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification

Surface water bodies’ typology,

Danube river basin countries and Ukraine experience

Alexei Iarochevitch

Antalya

December 5, 2014

Content

Purpose of typologyRivers typology (system A and system B, Danube, Turkey)Lakes typology (system A and system B, Danube, Turkey)Transitional WBs’ typology (system A and system B, Danube,

Turkey)Costal WB’s typology (system A and system B, Danube, Turkey)Ukraine typology

Purpose of typology

The WFD requires to differentiate the relevant surface water bodies with respect to type and that Member States establish reference conditions for these types

The main purpose of typology is consequently to enable type specific reference conditions to be defined which in turn is used as the anchor of the classification system

RiversAll rivers are different by:

CatchmentLengthHydrological regimeMorphological parameters

creek, Matra mountains, Hungary

Prut river,Carpathians, Ukraine

Fiumara d’Agro,Sicilia, Italy

Ikva river,north- west of Ukraine

Rivers

have a different water quality depending on:

Geology (organic, siliceous, calcareous)Pollution

Фотки

Pripyat river,north of Ukraine

Pripyat river,north of Ukraine

photo

Sava river,Slovenia

photo

Confluence of Bodrog and Tisza rivers,Tokaj, Hungary

RiversAll rivers are different by:

Aquatic floraBenthic invertebrateFish

photo

photo

Common Implementation Strategy

System A & system B For each surface water category, the relevant surface water bodies

within the river basin district shall be differentiated according to type. These types are those defined using either "system A" or "system B" identified in Section 1.2.

If System B is used, Member States must achieve at least the same degree of differentiation as would be achieved using System A. Accordingly, the surface water bodies within the river basin district shall be differentiated into types using the values for the obligatory descriptors and such optional descriptors, or combinations of descriptors, as are required to ensure that type specific biological reference conditions can be reliably derived

Rivers

Dnipro river, Kyiv, Ukraine

Rivers typology (System A)

Rivers typology (System B)

River typology in the Danube river basin district The typologies of the Danube tributaries were developed by the countries

individually. Stream types relevant on transboundary water courses were bilaterally

harmonized with the neighbors. Most countries in the Danube River Basin (Germany, Austria, Czech Republic,

Hungary, Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina) have applied System B. The Slovak Republic and Ukraine have used System A.

The common factors used mostly in DRB typologies are ecoregion, altitude, catchment area and geology. In the Czech typology the ecoregions are not included, instead of ecoregion, sea drainage area (= river basin) is used. In Slovenia no altitude classes were used in river typology.

Rivers typology

Optional factors

Parameter Countries

Mean water slope Germany, Slovakia, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Romania, Moldova

Mean substratum composition Germany, Hungary, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Serbia and Montenegro, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova, Ukraine

River discharge Slovakia, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Moldova

Valley shape Germany, Czech Republic, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Moldova

Channel form Germany, Slovakia, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Moldova

Hydrology / water flow Germany, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Moldova

Saprobiological Basic Condition Germany, Austria

Precipitation [mm p.a.] Romania

Temperature [°C] Romania

Fish Zonation Romania

Turkish river typology (EU Twinning project “Capacity Building on water quality monitoring”)

Lakes

Modre (Blue) lake,Imotski, Croatia

Lakes typology (System A)

Lakes typology (System B)

Lakes typology in the Danube river basin district

Turkish lakes typology (EU Twinning project “Capacity Building on water quality monitoring”)

Transitional waters

Danube river delta,Romania-Ukraine

Transitional waters typology (system A)

Transitional waters typology (System B)

Transitional WB typology in the Danube river basin district

Turkish transitional WB typology (EU Twinning project “Capacity Building on water quality monitoring”)

Coastal watersSouth coast,

Seven Sisters, England

Coastal waters typology (System A)

Coastal waters typology (System B)

Coastal WB typology in the Danube river basin district

Turkish coastal WB typology (EU Twinning project “Capacity Building on water quality monitoring”)

Conclusions & recommendations (1)

Water body types may be differentiated using ”System A” or ”System B”;

The two systems are similar in that they contain the same obligatory factors: geographic position, altitude, geology, size and (for lakes) depth;

Optional factors of System B can be used as desired by Member States and can be complemented with factors other than those mentioned in the Directive

Conclusions & recommendations (2) The Directiveґs descriptors of geology (in System A) refer to the dominating character (calcareous, siliceous, etc.), expected to have the strongest influence on ecological quality of the water body;

The Directiveґs requirement that MS must achieve the same degree of differentiation with System B as with System A is interpreted to mean that if System B is used, it should result in no greater degree of variability in type specific reference conditions than if System A had been used. Hence, if a lower number of types, using System B, results in equally low or lower variability of reference conditions values as would be given by System A, this would be acceptable;

Ukraine, Tisza river basin (Danube sub-basin)

Ukraine, Buh river basin (Black sea)

Reference and useful links Guidance document n.o 2 Identification of of Water Bodies. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC).

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm

  Guidance document n.o 10. River and lakes – Typology, reference conditions and classification

systems

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm

  Chapter 4. Characterization of surface water bodies // Danube Basin Analysis (WRD roof report

2004)

http://www.icpdr.org/main/publications/reports

  Chapter 4. Characterization of surface water bodies //Tisza River Basin Analysis report 2007

http://www.icpdr.org/main/danube-basin/tisza-basin

Thank you for attention!