orandietcredendion platos forms
Post on 03-Apr-2018
223 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 OrandietCredendion Platos Forms
1/4
St Thomas Aquinas
The end of all our desires,
eternal life, is fittingly placed
last among those things to be
believed; and the Creed says:
life everlasting. Amen.
They wrote this to stand
against those who believe
that the soul perishes with
the body.
St Bridget ofSweden
There is no sinner in the
world, however much at
enmity with God, who cannot
recover God's grace by
recourse to Mary, and by
asking her assistance.
St Philip Neri
MONDAY, 12 NOVEMBER 2012
On Plato's forms
It is widely defendedthroughout the early Socraticwoks, the transition phaseand the mature period of
Plato1
the doctrine of theforms or ideas. The doctrinestates that apart from the
material world, there exists arealm which transcends thesenses and acts as theprinciple on which things are
participating2
. An example ofthings which participate in the forms can be given interms of things around us. This constitutes the groundof Platonic metaphysics. In fact, an entire school ofmetaphysics has been constructed around the theory ofthe forms known as Platonic realism. Ever since the
5thcentury BC, there have appeared more theories and
ontologies which have challenged Platonism. This on-going debate is known as the debate of universals andparticulars. By the name the theory of forms would fallunder the category of universals whereas tangiblebeings have often been seen as particulars. If weobserve, say for example, a dog, we shall see thatdespite being numerically identical only to itself andunique, it still has something in common with otherdogs. This is the obvious property of being a dog. Thedog in this case is the particular. The principle whichunites all of these together and brings them into beingis the very form of dog itself which is beyond the limit
of all dogs in which all participate. Therefore it can besaid that the form of dog is the universal. In thisessay we wish to demonstrate that the theory of formsdoes nothing more than to duplicate the material world
0
Page 1 of 4Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi: On Plato's forms
11/06/2013http://orandietcredendi.blogspot.ae/2012/11/on-platos-forms.html
-
7/28/2019 OrandietCredendion Platos Forms
2/4
Prayer and communion are
not to be made or desired for
the sake of the devotion we
feel in them, for that is
seeking self, and not God;
but we must be frequent in
both the one and the other in
order to become humble,
obedient, gentle, and patient.
Blog Archive 2013 (5)
2012 (4)
November (1)
On Plato's forms
June (1)
April (1)
February(1)
2011 (10)
2010 (4)
Followers
Join this site
with Google Friend
Connect
Members (19) More
Already a member?Sign in
Catholic Vocations
Apostles of Jesus Christ,
Priest and Victim
Apostolic Administration of
St John Vianney
(Portuguese)
Benedictines of Clear Creek
Benedictines of
Fontgombault (French)
Benedictines of Le Barroux
(French)
Benedictines of Notre-Dame
de Randol Abbey (French)Birmingham Oratory
Brompton Oratory
and also to show the other objections which werepresented by Platos contemporaries as possiblesolutions to the problem of universals.
Plato gives the description of the form of beauty in a
manner which is best demonstrated in the Symposium3
:and neither comes to be nor perishes, neither waxes nor wanes;
next, it is not beautiful in part and in part ugly, nor is it such atsuch a time and other at another, nor in one respect beautiful andin another ugly, nor so affected by position as to seem beautiful to
some and ugly to others. the earth or sky or any other thing;
but existing ever in singularity of form independent by itself, while
all the multitude of beautiful things partake of it in such wise that,
though all of them are coming to be and perishing, it grows neither
greater nor less, and is affected by nothing.
Similarly, in the Hippias Major4
:Nothing is easier than to answer and tell him what the beautifulis, by which all other things are adorned and by the addition of
which they are made to appear beautiful.
It can be seen that this theory is an attempt to unify orto synthesise the properties of things which areobservable. It is to argue that they have a ground ofbeing in a transcendental realm of forms which are self-subsistent and of which all material entities have theirobjective ground of being. The philosopher andinterpreter of Plato, A.E. Taylor argues that thefundamental forms of Plato are shapes, integers and
mathematical objects5
. Plato more specifically suggestsa hierarchy of genera, species and being on which theontological reality of the forms is divided and exist.
They are further united and organised by an absoluteprinciple, called the demiurge ()
6
which isbest understood as a Supreme Being or God. Thishowever might just be the fatal flaw in the theory offorms. If God is the uniting principle of the forms, andHe is the one who created all of them, it begs thequestion as to whether or not they are necessary at all.It surely would seem possible that God could be theformal cause of all things without having to have formsas intermediaries or formal causes which transcendparticulars themselves. Indeed this is the solution wepropose in this work. To argue that the forms are what
unite particulars truly does nothing more than to createor duplicate the reality of particulars to a reality ofuniversals. What Plato did was not offering a proof forthe existence of the forms in any substantial sense. Itmight be argued that his eloquence in explaining theuniting principle of particulars transcends theparticulars themselves, yet they need not imply theexistence of an actual universal in ontology. Here weside with Aristotle and St Thomas Aquinas who arguedthat Plato offered no substantial proof for the existenceof the forms. In other words, the existence ofparticulars does not prove the existence of subsistent
and transcendent universals7.
St Thomas states:
Page 2 of 4Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi: On Plato's forms
11/06/2013http://orandietcredendi.blogspot.ae/2012/11/on-platos-forms.html
-
7/28/2019 OrandietCredendion Platos Forms
3/4
Fr. Z's Blog - What
Does The Prayer
Really Say?
The Eponymous
Flower
RORATE CLI
New Liturgical
Movement
Catholic Fire
Orbis Catholicus
Secundus
MiL -
Messainlatino.it
The Distributist
Review
Ite ad Thomam: "Go
to Thomas!"
Biblical Evidence for
Catholicism
Dominican Liturgy
ad altare dei
Roman Catholic Blog
Libera Me
RomishPapist -Home
Canons Regular of St
Augustine
Canons Regular of St John
Cantius
Carmelite Monastery Saint
Elias (Portuguese)
Carmelite Monks of
Wyoming
Communaut Saint-MartinFranciscans of the Eternal
Word
Franciscans of the
Immaculate
Fraternity of St Peter
Fraternity of St Vincent
Ferrer (French)
Heiligenkreuz Cistercians
(German)
Institute of Christ the King
Institute of the Good
Shepherd (French)
Knights of the Holy Eucharist
Opus Mariae MatrisEcclesiae (Italian)
Oxford Oratory
Sons of the Most Holy
Redeemer
Toronto Oratory
Trappist Monks of
Mariawald (German)
Good CatholicBlogs
According to Plato the Ideas are prior both to sensible things andto the objects of mathematics. But according to him the Ideas
themselves are numbers; and they are odd numbers rather than
even ones, because he attributed odd number to form and even
number to matter. Hence he also said that the dyad [or duality] is
matter. Therefore it follows that other numbers are prior to thedyad, which he held to be the matter of sensible things, and
identified with the great and small. Yet the Platonists asserted the
very opposite of this, that is to say, that the dyad is first in theclass of number.
This is one argument which shows not only theimprobability but the inherent contradiction thePlatonist faces when attempting to defend the realm offorms and ideas as concrete realities. It must be re-emphasised that the reason why Plato attempted toformulate an ontology around the forms wasspecifically to answer the problem of having particularswithout universals. Yet there is a further dilemmawhich the Platonist faces which is known as theproblem of the Third Man. The argument demonstratesthat the multiplicity of forms leads to an infinite regresswhich renders the theory problematic if not entirelyuseless. This is because in order to explain the forms,there must be a principle which unites the forms. Forthere to be such a principle, there would be anotherwhich unites the principle and so on ad infinitum. Inessence Plato attempted to explain the efficient causesof things by arguing that their ground of being was inthis transcendental realm. However as has beendemonstrated, the theory renders itself useless andproblematic, conflating the existence of material thingswith real abstract properties. We must therefore solvethe problem of universals without running intonominalist presuppositions in another manner.
Aristotle and St Thomas Aquinas recognised thatparticular corporeal beings are divided into form andmatter. It is of particular interest to us to expand moreon the notion of the formal causes which can eloquentlyexplain the existence of beings in the world withoutpositing the abstract realm of forms. The formal causeof being is that which gives it its essence, in otherwords, its genera and species. The formal cause of ahuman being is man itself. This is derived through the
abstraction of the particular and individual human to agrasp of the essence which is common amongst allmen. Hence when we use the predicate is a man, wepresume that all beings who are men have a commonproperty which can be known through the intellect viaabstraction rather than participation in an actual form.
St Thomas Aquinas states8:For human nature exists in the intellect in abstraction from allthat individuates; and this is why it has a content which is the
same in relation to all individual men outside the soul; it is equally
the likeness of all of them, and leads to a knowledge of all insofar
as they are men. And it is from the fact that the nature has such arelation to all individuals that the intellect discovers and attributes
the notion of the species to it.
Page 3 of 4Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi: On Plato's forms
11/06/2013http://orandietcredendi.blogspot.ae/2012/11/on-platos-forms.html
-
7/28/2019 OrandietCredendion Platos Forms
4/4
Newer Post Older Post
We therefore conclude by reaffirming that the Platonictheory of Ideas does not much in terms of self-explanation. Rather it attempts to solve the problem weencounter when attempting to explain the vast numberof things of the same genera, species and properties. Itsuffices to say that Plato's argument for thetranscendental forms are not proofs in the concrete
sense but rather an appeal to what he deemed as thebest explanation. This essay has demonstrated that thisexplanation is not only not the best but also facesserious problems when attempting to explain theinfinite possibility of forms (third man argument) andalso the fact that forms themselves do not havecausation-like properties. It would require God to uniteparticulars and make them participate in the forms.This however would make the notion of the formsobsolete since if God exists, He could simply createindividual beings without having to unite them to anytranscendent entities.
---------------------------------------1FrederickCoplestonSJAhistoryofPhilosophy(NewmanPress1962),vol.1,partIII,p.139-140
2Republic,596a3Symposium,211-2124HippiasMajor,289d5A.E.Taylor Plato:Themanandhiswork,p.512-5146Timaeus,30a7StThomasAquinas CommentaryonAristotlesMetaphysics,Bk.I,LessonXIV
8Deenteetessentia,a.60
Posted by Hans Coessens at07:19Labels:Aquinas , Aristotle ,Forms ,God ,Ideas ,Plato ,Platonism ,Thomism
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment as: Select profile...
Publish Preview
Home
Subscribe to:Post Comments (Atom)
Page 4 of 4Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi: On Plato's forms
11/06/2013http://orandietcredendi blogspot ae/2012/11/on platos forms html
top related