report on csu hpc (high-performance computing) study ricky yu–kwong kwok co-chair, research...

Post on 01-Jan-2016

214 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Report on CSU HPC (High-Performance Computing)

Study

Ricky Yu–Kwong KwokCo-Chair, Research Advisory Committee

ISTeCRicky.Kwok@colostate.edu

August 18, 2008Presented to CSU CRAD

2

Outline

1. Motivation for the Study2. Interpretations of Findings3. Summary of Findings4. Representative HPC Activities5. CoGrid Job Submission System6. HPC Forum (9/3/2008)

3

Motivation for the Study

HPC is a 3rd way of conducting research and discovery

To assess current activities and future opportunities

To look at current systems at CSU

To make CSU more competitive in the research arena

Study Motivation

4

Interpretations of Findings

37 responses 26 departments, 31 research areas

HPC is “hot” at CSU!

1/3 of users have no immediate access to HPC resources rely on other departments within CSU OR other organizations outside CSU may be subject to strict resource restrictions

Interpretations of Findings

5

Interpretations of Findings

Scattered resources

Majority of users pessimistic about their HPC needs being met in future

Advanced visualization needs require enhancement

Need to “advertise” GRAD 510/511 courses

Space limitations for HPC hardware???

Consultancy?

Affinity groups?Interpretations of Findings

6

Summary of Findings

37 responses 26 departments, 31 research areasBesides CoGrid node, Bioinformatics cluster and HP Half Dome system, 8 additional HPC resources, e.g., (see Table 2 in the Report) CIRA – 32-processor cluster Chemical and Biological Engineering – 32-node

Linux cluster Mathematics – 42-node cluster Some more new resources to come (e.g., new

HP donations)Summary of Findings

7

Usage of HPC

Summary of Findings

8

Nature of Usage

Summary of Findings

9

Algorithms Used

Summary of Findings

10

HPC Resource Used

Summary of Findings

11

HPC Needs Met?

Current Future

Summary of Findings

12

Visualization Needs Met?

Current Future

Summary of Findings

13

Compiler Used

Summary of Findings

14

Language Used

Summary of Findings

15

Be Involved in Future HPC Activities?

Summary of Findings

16

Aware of GRAD 510/511?

Summary of Findings

17

Required Follow-Up?

Summary of Findings

18

Presentation Outline

1. Motivation of the Study2. Interpretations of Findings3. Summary of Findings4. Representative HPC Activities5. CoGrid Job Submission System6. HPC Forum

19

Small-angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS)

To understand biological systems

Determine 3-D structure

Monte Carlo simulations for data modeling

Computationally intensive HPC

Representative HPC Activities

20

Genomic Analysis

Study the evolution of functional DNA sequences

Comparative phylogenomic analysis

Highly computationally intensive cluster of Linux machines with 8 – 32 nodes

Representative HPC Activities

21

Proteomics

Large-scale study of proteins

Searching methods to analyze mass spectrometry data

Sequence matching

Access to large databases

Representative HPC Activities

22

Pattern Analysis

Investigate unexplained phenomena from high-dimensional, massive data sets

Mathematical theory efficient algorithms exploring, understanding, modeling massive data sets

PAL lab (Pattern Analysis Laboratory)

42-node cluster with 156 GB total memory, over 5 TB disk storage

Representative HPC Activities

23

CoGrid Job Submission System

Sharing of geographically distributed computational resources

Batch processing of jobs Job description Resource requirements Execution Monitoring

CoGrid

24

HPC Forum (9/3/2008)

1. Introduction and ISTeC Overview: HJ

2. Background on CSU’s HPC History and Activities: Pat Burns

3. Findings from ISTeC’s HPC Survey: Ricky

4. Advanced Networking Capabilities at CSU: Scott Baily, Director of ACNS

5. Educational Activities in HPC: Sanjay Rajopadhye and Wim Bohm (Computer Science)

6. Plan for an ISTeC Visualization Facility: HJ

7. NERSC and the INCITE Program as a Viable Alternative: Josh Ladd (Mathematics)

8. Open Discussion – Faculty Needs and Directions

25

Summary

Motivation: To look at current systems in CSU and future HPC needs

Presented interpretations and findings of the survey

Discussed representative HPC activities

Introduced CoGrid job submission system, as a possible campus-wide resource management model

HPC Forum for further discussions

top related