science in the youtube age

Post on 06-May-2015

3.180 Views

Category:

Technology

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

The version with most of the material that was the version I should have used live - but not the version I did

TRANSCRIPT

Science in the YouTube Age:How web based tools are enabling Open

Research

Cameron NeylonSTFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

http://openwetware.org/wiki/User:Cameron_Neylon

http://friendfeed.com/cameronneylon

http://tinyurl.com/5ffpth

http://twitter.com/cameronneylon

‘If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants…’

Isaac Newton

‘I never had an idea that couldn’t be

improved by sharing it with as many people

as possible…’Bill Hooker – 3 Quarks Daily (2006)http://3quarksdaily.blogs.com/3quarksdaily/2006/10/the_future_of_s_1.html

Science is social

Web 2.0 is social

Science needs Web 2.0?

What amI thinking?

How do Ijustify this?

How do I do this?

What am I doing?

What doesit mean?

Here bejournals

What am I reading?

Who can help me?

Lets go out!

Best placeto go?

How do Ijustify this?

Extract cash from parents

Coordination

Take photos/video/audio

Uploading photos/video

Commentingon photos

What did the others do?

What wasI thinking?!?

What am I doing?

What am I doing?

http://chemtools.chem.soton.ac.uk/projects/blogs/blogs.php/blog_id/10

What amI thinking?

What am I thinking?

What does it mean?

http://www.zoology.ubc.ca/~redfieldindex.html

What am I reading?

What am I

reading?

How do I do this?

How do I do this?

How do I do this?

Science is social

Web 2.0 is social

Science needs Web 2.0

Science is social

Web 2.0 is social

Science needs Web 2.0

…like a hole in the head

David Crotty (2008) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Why Web2.0 is failing in Biologyhttp://www.cshblogs.org/cshprotocols/2008/02/14/why-web-20-is-failing-in-biology/

•Network size issues

•Barriers to entry

•Not enough time

•Too many ‘me too’ sites

•Fear of being ‘scooped’

Rich Apodaca (2007) Depth-First, Scientific Publication and the Seven Deadly Sinshttp://depth-first.com/articles/2007/05/14/scientific-publication-and-the-seven-deadly-sins

How do Ijustify this?

How do I do this?

Science is social

Scientists are not (necessarily) social

Web 2.0 fundamentally relies on openness

Without a change in culture and rewards the benefits of Web 2.0 will not be realised

Lab notebook

Blog

Bookmarks

Contacts

Literature

Jeremy Frey, Andrew Milsted, Steve Wilson, Jenny Hale

Jean-Claude Bradley, Jeremiah Faith, Michael Barton, Deepak Singh, Bill Hooker, Pedro Beltrao, Shirley Wu, Pawel Szczesny, Ricardo Vidal, Mat Todd, Antony Williams, Peter Murray-Rust, Bill Flanagan, Julius Lucks, John Cumbers, Liz Lyon, John Wilbanks, Simon Coles, Andy Powell, Timo Hannay, Dave de Roure… ‘The Open Science Collective’

Acknowledgements

top related