the changing demand for talent in the semiconductor industry · the changing demand for talent in...
Post on 21-Jul-2020
5 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
B l u e P a p e r
The changing demand for talent in the semiconductor industry
Market-savvy talent is a scarce resource in the semiconductor sector. But if
you’re thinking of recruiting talent from only the competition, think again.
Spencer Stuart
Spencer Stuart is the foremost privately held, global execu-
tive search firm, spanning over 50 offices in 25 countries.
Since 1956, we have been providing select clients with a
range of human capital solutions, including senior-level
executive search, board director appointments, strategic
leadership services and middle-management recruiting.
We conduct nearly 4,000 assignments each year, partnering
effectively with clients ranging from the Fortune 500, to
mid-cap, to emerging growth companies across a broad
range of industries and sectors.
Widely regarded as the firm of choice for CEO, board director
and other top-level executive searches, our worldwide
consultants have the judgment, insight and expertise to find
the ideal fit for each company’s unique circumstances and
business goals. Clients choose to establish long-term
relationships with us based on our exceptional client service,
unmatched access to the most sought-after leaders and
consistently successful results.
We are committed to adhering to the same firm policies,
procedures and professional standards worldwide in order
to provide a service of the highest caliber to our clients.
Global forces are changing the semiconductor industry. After the tremendous
growth of the late 1990s, demand dropped by more than 30 percent — making
2001 and 2002 the worst years in the history of the industry. The resulting
build-up of inventory eventually drove down prices with chipmakers retrenching
operations to meet a new financial reality. Though the industry was battered,
the worst was behind. Today, the industry is recovering and showing many of
the signs of entering another “boom” phase. However, to take advantage of this
coming upswing, chip manufacturers will need to think and act in new ways,
especially as massive foundries, globalization and demands for increasing
functionality continue to reshape the industry.
To succeed in this new environment, chipmakers are, once again, expanding
the boundaries of performance and functionality. Yet to remain focused and
competitive, companies will need to hire and train the most capable talent and —
most paramount — reach out and bring talent into the sector. With the stakes
this high, the winners in this market will know how to obtain top-notch talent and
use human capital to their advantage to change the rules of the game.
Spencer Stuart recently reached out to 700 leading semiconductor executives to
learn how the industry was evolving and to uncover the type of talent needed to
meet the myriad challenges.
B l u e P a p e r
2
Strategic backdrop
Change. It’s the mantra of the semiconductor industry. Today, chipmakers are experiencing
major changes as the industry seeks to capitalize on expanding markets, avoid commoditi-
zation of products and address the increasing complexities of product development and
manufacturing. Add to this the disaggregation of the traditional semiconductor model (e.g.,
foundries and fabless design centers), and the magnitude of change is even more
pronounced.
The most important industry changes:
> Increase in systems and software content
> Increase in globalization of markets
> Increase in research and development requirements
> Increase in capital requirements
> Increase in industry disaggregation
From a structural standpoint, chipmakers are adapting well to these new challenges. Fabless
design houses are crafting ever-more sophisticated SoC (system on a chip) offerings.
Technical barriers continuously are overcome and Moore’s Law remains in effect. Capital-
intensive foundry operations are being outsourced to 300 mm fabs that can leverage
massive economies of scale. The whole industry is embracing the global environment.
However, as much as the industry is surmounting the technical and operating challenges,
upgrades in human capital are sorely lacking. New skills are required to effectively compete
in today’s market — skills that our survey respondents almost universally indicated are in
short supply.
Experience with end-equipment companies 1 4 (tie)
Global knowledge and experience 2 3
Analog design and management capabilities 3 2
Alliance management 4 7 (tie)
Business complexity management 5 7 (tie)
Software design and management capabilities 6 6
Consumer insights 7 9
Product planning and life-cycle management 8 4 (tie)
Digital design and management capabilities 9 1
Program management 10 10
Ranked by Need Ranked by Current Capability
What skills will your company need?
3
But where will these skills come from? In our study, almost 80 percent of respondents
indicated that they hoped to find these skilled individuals within the industry. Yet, if
executives are relying on recruiting talent away from their competitors, they had better
think again. Our study revealed that everyone in the industry is looking at the competition
for world-class talent — the old “grass is always greener” assumption. Well, the grass is
not greener; the talent pool simply is very limited. To succeed, the semiconductor industry
will need to expand its available pool of talent through selective industry hiring, savvy
“outside industry” hiring and strong internal development.
Skills as differentiators
While the demands of business and technology management in the semiconductor world
always have been high, tomorrow’s leaders will need to embrace, organize and manage
around a new set of skills.
Think like your customersOne of the most critical skills identified by respondents is experience with end-equipment
companies, which have historically “owned” the customer relationship. Winning organi-
zations are developing the talent and systems to move up the value chain to deeply under-
stand their customers’ equipment businesses and gain deeper knowledge of end-user
trends. In our survey, more than 90 percent of executives said they recently had comple-
ted or were in the process of preparing initiatives to get them closer to equipment
manufacturers. These activities included developing embedded software tailored for
specific end-uses, identifying the needs of consumers and locating design centers across
multiple continents to be closer to the end-user market. However, the type of competency-
based experience required to accomplish these initiatives rarely is found within the
semiconductor industry.
Consider the example of ATI, a leading manufacturer of graphics chips. The company
serves multiple market segments including personal computers, cell phones, set top
boxes and HDTV. Understanding the needs of leading companies in each sector is a linch-
pin of ATI’s success. The company relies heavily on architects who understand both the
technical and business drivers of industry leaders like Intel, Microsoft, Nokia, Motorola,
Samsung, Sony and others. “Having architects who can talk to customers is absolutely
“Our handheld bus ines s is becoming quite succes s ful because lead architectstalk to cus tomers…and lis ten. There is a difference.”
David Orton, chief operating officer of ATI
B l u e P a p e r
4
critical,” said David Orton, chief operating officer of ATI. Orton actively seeks outward-
facing technical leaders who understand overall market dynamics and use this knowledge
to synthesize common requirements across ATI’s customer base. “Our handheld
business is becoming quite successful because lead architects talk to customers…and
listen. There is a difference,” he said. “Even in this tough job market, these broad-skilled
individuals are extremely difficult to find and attract.”
Manage ever-growing business complexity Our survey revealed that the No. 1 action companies are taking to better position them-
selves is to develop a broader, more diverse product mix that can be tailored to specific
consumer applications. This combination of additional products and greater customization
implies that a more sophisticated set of business complexity management skills is needed
to handle the increasingly multifaceted product mix and to maximize the life-cycle value
of a product.
To succeed, leaders will need to navigate through a forest of challenges: multiple customer
segments, a broad array of product offerings, decreased time to market, enhanced cus-
tomization, shorter product life cycles, accelerated product roadmaps and increased
competition as a result of lower barriers to entry. All of these issues will need to be dealt
with quickly by executives who possess both technical know-how and strategic thinking.
While business complexity management skills always have been key for the semiconductor
industry, today, this complex skill-set is in much greater demand.
As one venture capitalist summarized, “Semiconductor companies used to be able to
focus on just turning out high-performance products. As we move to a greater consumer
focus, not only do the products have to be high performance, but they also have to be
delivered in time for the holiday season, the back-to-school season, etc. Missing a market
deadline may be even more deadly than missing a [technical] performance target.”
Becoming even more globalGlobal knowledge and operating experience have become requirements, not nice-to-haves,
and they are components of complexity that demand specific attention. Creating design
centers across the globe and moving manufacturing to low-cost areas is a common theme
among the survey respondents. In addition to the cost-savings advantage, the international
locations put the company in closer touch with emerging markets. However, according to
our survey, nearly half of all respondents felt they needed additional talent to enhance
cross-cultural leadership.
Many leaders acknowledge that building a business to capitalize on emerging markets
presents unique human capital requirements. In the case of China, in which approxi-
mately 86 percent of respondents cited as a high area of growth, it still remains an essen-
5
tially closed market. Semiconductor companies will need to devise the most effective way
to penetrate the market, both from the perspective of the customer and of their talent.
As a senior human resource executive at a major multinational semiconductor company
said, “We really set up a nearly mutually exclusive set of requirements. We want people
who are comfortable working for a Western company but operating in an Eastern culture.
We want the Western-focus on results, but with an Eastern sensitivity to the employees
and customers. And it’s not easy to find!”
This opinion is all too common and the semiconductor industry will need to become
more creative in staffing international operations. Based on specific business needs, some
companies may opt to establish competencies across a team of people versus trying to
fulfill all requirements with a single individual; other companies may look to recruit a
native-born executive with vast business experience in the Western world. Either way,
when expanding into new markets, managers will need to integrate global systems and
adapt them regionally, taking into account cultural differences.
Remember, the world is still analogAs Mark Twain famously quipped, “Rumors of my death have been greatly exaggerated.”
This aptly describes the spirit of the analog design community, which has operated in the
shadow of digital design for the last two decades. As mixed-signal/analog processing
becomes incorporated into more semiconductor solutions, management faces the very
practical challenge of finding enough analog talent. Compared to digital skills, analog
skills were ranked “most critical” twice as often, yet respondents indicated a preponder-
ance of digital design talent but a clear shortage of analog design and management skills.
China
Other Asia Pacific
North America
Europe
Latin/South America
Japan
In what regions do you see semiconductor growth?
0% 20 40 60 80 100%
moderate growth high growth
The shortage of analog talent can be attributed to a number of factors. First, analog design
is much more of an art than a science and good analog designers develop over time through
on-the-job training. Second, it is more expensive to develop curriculum in analog design
as the necessary design tools are costly and true training requires developing actual proto-
type chips. This makes it difficult for electrical engineering schools to create analog
classes, whereas digital semiconductor design courses are much easier to produce. Finally,
there traditionally have been more digital jobs in the marketplace, with skill-sets that can
be applied to a wide range of positions. These variables, in combination, make finding
analog talent a real challenge for most semiconductor companies.
To overcome this challenge, many in the industry are beginning to fund analog design
coursework at universities, with the hope of recruiting directly from these schools.
Others are beginning to acquire companies that are rich in analog engineers.
Are they your partner, competitor or customer?Semiconductor companies increasingly are turning to alliances with partners, competitors
and customers to cover as much of the market as possible. Alliance management skills are
one of only three areas in our survey for which a significant number of respondents
described their company’s expertise as being “below industry average.” The increasing
magnitude of investment needed to stay competitive in the industry, combined with
continued disaggregation of the semiconductor business, has led to more occurrences of
technology alliances.
Perhaps no other company takes its alliances farther upstream than Intel. The company
initially forged relationships with other chipmakers and steadily has moved up the value
chain through customers, which include board and systems manufacturers. Today, Intel
invests heavily in relationships with leading independent software vendors who have
market-making enterprise software products. The goal is simple: optimize these applica-
tions for platforms based on Intel technology and create ready-made solutions for end-
users. Intel creates demand and fills its fabs; independent software vendors gain benefits
from Intel’s technical knowledge, sales/marketing might and valued brand.
B l u e P a p e r
6
“We need s trategic thinkers who can not only s tructure the deal, but who alsohave the hands -on experience to s trategically influence the organization at thesenior executive level and are able to manage a win-win s ituation.”
Neil Blecherman, director of business operations, sales and marketing for Intel
7
Neil Blecherman has managed Intel’s relationships with several leading independent
software vendors as the director of the business operations, sales and marketing group.
A Wharton M.B.A. with more than a decade of experience in sales and marketing for
Intel, Blecherman stressed the need for strong leadership in alliance management. “Many
alliances are sales-focused,” he said, “and, as a result, you find that these relationships are
managed by lower-level staff with limited organizational knowledge and influence. Our
alliances are extremely complex, encompassing a mix of technology transfer, marketing,
sales and large budgets. The business issues are mind boggling. We need strategic
thinkers who can not only structure the deal, but who also have the hands-on experience
to strategically influence organizations at the senior executive level and are able to
manage a win-win situation.”
The human capital roadmap
Capturing and institutionalizing a complex mix of technical, business and market skills is
not a trivial matter. Some skills can be developed in-house, while others must be brought
in from outside sources. Organizing this wide variety of competency-based resources to
work together is a daunting task in itself. However, success can be achieved by following a
structured, long-term human capital roadmap.
1. Know where you need to go.
Our study revealed that many semiconductor companies are lacking several core capabili-
ties required for future growth: end-customer skills; business complexity management;
global knowledge; analog skills; and alliance management. Companies must continue to
take a hard look at their businesses and markets to determine what additional competen-
cies and experiences are required. In addition, leadership cannot overlook how each
strategic priority and skill-set relates to each function within the organization.
2. Know what you have and what you don’t have.
It is critical to benchmark your current talent against where you need to go. By identifying
those key skills, competencies and experiences that exist in your organization — and
which ones do not — you will know what you need to acquire. As part of that benchmark-
ing process, it is imperative that semiconductor companies look beyond the industry. In
many cases, the equipment manufacturers possess superior marketing skills or are better
able to tap into cross-cultural talent.
3. Know how to close the gap.
Finally, a comprehensive human capital roadmap is needed to close the talent gaps. This
transition plan is the most complex part of the process because, as our survey indicated,
the needed talent is not prevalent in the semiconductor industry — even though our
B l u e P a p e r
8
survey respondents stated that they believed their competitors were somehow richer in
talent. Identify the competencies to be developed in-house and determine where to acquire
outside talent. Integrate this plan into day-to-day operations and follow through over the
long term.
Conclusion
Chip companies will have to expand their human capital options if they hope to attract and
recruit the talent necessary to lead the industry. Traditionally, semiconductor talent has
been promoted up through the ranks. Yet, today, with the landscape changing so rapidly,
industry leadership has had difficulty adopting a new mindset when it comes to recruiting
from within the industry. With the skill-sets lacking, companies must begin focusing on
hiring from outside the industry, making greater investments in internal development
and/or conducting targeted recruiting of top prospects from competitors. When looking
outside of the sector for talent, companies also need to identify other industries that have
undergone similar changes and apply those “lessons learned” to their individual situations.
In fact, we are seeing many semiconductor companies adopt this approach when recruit-
ing outside board directors. These semiconductor companies aggressively are recruiting
directors from their customers in order to bridge the gap of knowledge and experience.
Over the past year alone, we have recruited numerous directors from equipment manufac-
turers to the boards of semiconductor concerns. We expect this recent boardroom trend to
become more common at the executive and middle-management organizational layers as
leading chip makers adapt to new market drivers.
At the end of the day, it’s all about adding value to your customers, and that value only can
be delivered through talented individuals. Everyone wants to own that value: you, your
competitors and — yes — your customers. The resulting talent shortfall shows no sign of
ebbing, and is only expected to grow in the near-term. And the fight for value will not
easily be won, and your ability to execute the human capital roadmap will be a key to
continued success.
About the study
Spencer Stuart recently completed an industry study focusing on leadership in the semicon-ductor industry. After identifying leading global semiconductor companies, we reached outto more than 700 of the leading industry executives — including CEOs, sales executives,human resource executives and business-unit leaders — and achieved an approximate 10percent response rate.
9
Integrated device manufacturer 57% >$1 billion 60%
Fabless semiconductor company 34% $999 million – $251 million 14%
Semiconductor equipment manufacturer 11% $250 million – $51 million 10%
Foundry or assembly/best provider 4% $50 million – $6 million 8%
Design software company 4% <$5 million 8%
Other 4%
respondent profile
Sector % Respondents Company Annual Revenue % Respondents
surveyed companies
3dfx interactive
altera
amkor technology
analog devices
ati technologies
atmel corporation
broadcom corporation
cirrus logic
creative labs
gennum corporation
ikanos communications
intel
invensys plc
motorola
nucore technology
pmc-sierra
qualcomm
sandisk corporation
siliconix
sirf technology
texas instruments
usa high tech industry
vantis corporation
wavecom
B l u e P a p e r
10
About the authormichael lynch san mateoMike is a member of Spencer Stuart’s Technology, Communications & Media
Practice and is based in the firm’s Silicon Valley office. A technophile at
heart, he is focused on senior general management assignments in a variety
of technology sectors, including semiconductors, electronics manufacturing
services, security and professional services. Within these industries, Mike
successfully has completed assignments in general management, marketing,
sales, professional services and R&D. His clients range in size from large
multinationals such as Cisco, Hewlett-Packard and Solectron, to early-stage,
venture-backed businesses. He began his career as a systems engineer with
IBM Labs in Toronto, where he worked on early-stage distributed computing
services. After completing his M.B.A., Mike moved into management
consulting with EDS and Accenture, and also held the position of vice presi-
dent of operations at two early-stage startups. He earned a degree in electri-
cal engineering form the University of Victoria and an M.B.A. from UCLA.
Amsterdam T 31 (0) 20.305.73.05
F 31 (0) 20.305.73.50
AtlantaT 404.504.4400
F 404.504.4401
Barcelona T 34.93.487.23.36
F 34.93.487.09.44
BeijingT 86.10.6505.1031
F 86.10.6505.1032
BogotaT 571.618.2488
F 571.618.2317
BostonT 617.531.5731
F 617.531.5732
BrusselsT 32.2.732.26.25
F 32.2.732.19.39
Budapest T 36.1.200.08.50
F 36.1.394.10.97
Buenos AiresT 54.11.4313.2233
F 54.11.4313.2299
ChicagoT 312.822.0080
F 312.822.0116
DallasT 214.672.5200
F 214.672.5299
Frankfurt T 49 (0) 69.61.09.27.0
F 49 (0) 69.61.09.27.50
Geneva T 41.22.312.36.38
F 41.22.312.36.39
Hong KongT 852.2521.8373
F 852.2810.5246
HoustonT 713.225.1621
F 713.658.8336
JohannesburgT 27.11.880.2217
F 27.11.880.4051
Leeds T 44 (0) 1937.547700
F 44 (0) 1937.547710
London T 44 (0) 20 7298.3333
F 44 (0) 20 7298.3388
Los AngelesT 310.209.0610
F 310.209.0912
Madrid T 34.91.745.85.00
F 34.91.561.42.75
Manchester T 44 (0) 161.499.6700
F 44 (0) 161.499.6710
Melbourne T 61.3.9654.2155
F 61.3.9654.4730
Mexico CityT 5255.5281.4050
F 5255.5281.4184
MiamiT 305.443.9911
F 305.443.2180
Milan T 39.02.771251
F 39.02.782452
Minneapolis/St. PaulT 612.313.2000
F 612.313.2001
Montreal T 514.288.3377
F 514.288.4626
Munich T 49 (0) 89.45.55.53.0
F 49 (0) 89.45.55.53.33
New YorkT 212.336.0200
F 212.336.0296
Orange CountyT 949.930.8000
F 949.930.8001
Paris T 33 (0) 1.53.57.81.23
F 33 (0) 1.53.57.81.00
PhiladelphiaT 215.814.1600
F 215.814.1681
Prague T 420.221.411.341
F 420.222.233.087
RomeT 39.06.802071
F 39.06.80207200
San FranciscoT 415.495.4141
F 415.495.7524
San MateoT 650.356.5500
F 650.356.5501
SantiagoT 56.2.940.2700
F 56.2.249.7883
Sao PauloT 55.11.3759.7700
F 55.11.3759.7736
ScottsdaleT 480.563.1600
F 480.342.8626
Shanghai T 86.21.6386.1177
F 86.21.5306.2718
SingaporeT 65.6438.3138
F 65.6438.3136
StamfordT 203.324.6333
F 203.326.3737
StockholmT 46.8.534.801.50
F 46.8.534.801.69
SydneyT 61.2.9247.4031
F 61.2.9251.3021
TokyoT 81.3.3238.8901
F 81.3.3238.8902
TorontoT 416.361.0311
F 416.361.6118
Vienna T 43 (1) 36.88.700.0
F 43 (1) 36.88.777
WarsawT 48.22.840.60.61
F 48.22.642.36.78
Washington, D.C.T 202.639.8111
F 202.639.8222
Zurich T 41.1.257.17.17
F 41.1.257.17.18
For copies, please contact:Stephanie Krolicki, MarketingT 312.396.3878 orskrolicki@spencerstuart.com.
© 2004 Spencer Stuart.Permission is granted for reproduction in whole or in part provided Spencer Stuart is credited.
www.spencerstuart.comAmsterdam
Atlanta
Barcelona
Beijing
Bogota
Boston
Brussels
Budapest
Buenos Aires
Chicago
Dallas
Frankfurt
Geneva
Hong Kong
Houston
Johannesburg
Leeds
London
Los Angeles
Madrid
Manchester
Melbourne
Mexico City
Miami
Milan
Minneapolis/St. Paul
Montreal
Munich
New York
Orange County
Paris
Philadelphia
Prague
Rome
San Francisco
San Mateo
Santiago
Sao Paulo
Scottsdale
Shanghai
Singapore
Stamford
Stockholm
Sydney
Tokyo
Toronto
Vienna
Warsaw
Washington, D.C.
Zurich
top related