amsr-e soil moisture retrievals using the sca during nafe’06

10
AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06 T.J. Jackson and R. Bindlish USDA ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab September 22, 2008

Upload: camden

Post on 14-Jan-2016

21 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06. T.J. Jackson and R. Bindlish USDA ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab September 22, 2008. Background. Single Channel Algorithm (SCA) was applied to AMSR-E data using approach designed for JAXA real time retrievals. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06

AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During

NAFE’06

T.J. Jackson and R. BindlishUSDA ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab

September 22, 2008

Page 2: AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06

Background

• Single Channel Algorithm (SCA) was applied to AMSR-E data using approach designed for JAXA real time retrievals.

• SCA uses an estimate of vegetation water content (VWC) based on NDVI.

• A key aspect of this approach is that vegetation effects are corrected using climatological (AVHRR) NDVI data in order to meet operational requirements. 

Page 3: AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06

Example of Annual vs. Climatological NDVI Variations

• Variability in AVHRR NDVI from year to year for the Mongolia study area (ASSH Network).

Page 4: AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06

Location of VSM sites

Page 5: AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06

NAFE’06 Soil Moisture Results• Figure provided by Clara Draper: SCA retrievals and in situ observations.• Anomalous (high) soil moisture values during campaign

• Hypothesis: Drought conditions resulted in low NDVI that was not accounted for in the climatological values. • This may also be associated with the version of the products, a correction of the temperature component was

made that fixed some errors. See next graph.

Page 6: AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06

Updated SCA Retrievals• Several revisions to the SCA have been made in the period since the data were provided

– Soil Temperature – The top 0.2 cm soil temperature was computed using 37V GHz observations (similar to De Jeu). The relationship was recomputed using data from LW, WG, LR and RC. Heat transfer process based of soil thermal properties was used to compute 1 cm soil temperature. Thermal properties of soil are dependent on soil texture.

– Vegetation – The b parameter was optimized globally for each landcover. Optimization was done based on estimating physically reasonable dielectric constant for maximum number of AMSR-E observations (above rock and below water).

– Flags• Most of the anomalous behavior has been eliminated• Example: Kyeamba (we do not have the ground data)

– Appears to match up much better

AVHRR

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

18-Jun 8-Jul 28-Jul 17-Aug 6-Sep 26-Sep 16-Oct 5-Nov 25-Nov 15-Dec 4-Jan 24-Jan

Date 2006

Vol

umet

ric

Soi

l Moi

stur

e (%

)

AVHRR

Data originally provided

Revision

Page 7: AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06

Comma

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

6/30 7/20 8/9 8/29 9/18 10/8 10/28 11/17 12/7 12/27

Date

VS

M

Kyeamba

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

6/30 7/20 8/9 8/29 9/18 10/8 10/28 11/17 12/7 12/27

Date

VS

M

Adelong

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

6/30 7/20 8/9 8/29 9/18 10/8 10/28 11/17 12/7 12/27

Date

VS

M

Canberra

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

6/30 7/20 8/9 8/29 9/18 10/8 10/28 11/17 12/7 12/27

Date

VS

M

Balranald

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

6/30 7/20 8/9 8/29 9/18 10/8 10/28 11/17 12/7 12/27

Date

VS

M

Hay

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

6/30 7/20 8/9 8/29 9/18 10/8 10/28 11/17 12/7 12/27

Date

VS

M

Yanco

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

6/30 7/20 8/9 8/29 9/18 10/8 10/28 11/17 12/7 12/27

DateV

SM

Cootamundra

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

6/30 7/20 8/9 8/29 9/18 10/8 10/28 11/17 12/7 12/27

Date

VS

M

Griffith

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

6/30 7/20 8/9 8/29 9/18 10/8 10/28 11/17 12/7 12/27

Date

VS

M

West Wyalong

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

6/30 7/20 8/9 8/29 9/18 10/8 10/28 11/17 12/7 12/27

Date

VS

M

Updated SCA Retrievals for NAFE’06

Page 8: AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06

Comparison of AVHRR and MODIS NDVI for June-December 2006

• MODIS products (16 day) were extracted for each of the 10 in situ sites (0.25 degree area averaged)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

18-Jun 8-Jul 28-Jul 17-Aug 6-Sep 26-Sep 16-Oct 5-Nov 25-Nov 15-Dec

Date 2006

ND

VI

AVHRR

MODIS

Example: Kyeamba

Page 9: AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06

Interpretation of AVHRR and MODIS NDVI for June-December 2006

• For most sites– Before Oct. 1: AVHRR NDVI < MODIS NDVI– After Oct. 1: AVHRR NDVI > MODIS NDVI– Most significant deviations during NAFE’06– This error would lead to over estimation of soil

moisture.

Page 10: AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06

Summary

• The SCA corrections eliminated the obvious errors in the NAFE’06 retrievals

• Retrieved soil moisture looks good as compared to the observed (visual interpretation)

• Suggest redoing analysis• There were deviations between the long term average

NDVI and the 16 day MODIS products that were reasonable considering the weather conditions

• However, this would need further evaluation AFTER a review of the revised products