an investigation of mobile communication application for...

129
國立成功大學 統計學研究所 碩士論文 行動通訊應用軟體使用者行為意向之研究 ─以台灣北部、中部、南部為例 An Investigation of Mobile Communication Application for UsersBehavior Intention A study in Northern, Middle and Southern Taiwan 生:林宜慧 指導教授:吳宗正 中華民國一○二年六月

Upload: others

Post on 30-Aug-2019

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • An Investigation of Mobile Communication Application for

    Users Behavior Intention

    A study in Northern, Middle and Southern Taiwan

  • DeLone and McLean (2003)

    Wang (2008)

  • Abstract

    In recent year, using Mobile Communication Application become a trend as the

    prevalence of smart phone. According to the investigation of institute for

    information industry, surfing social network is the most often to do in wireless on

    line. It causes the sensation on free communication software to replace the expense

    of telephone bill. Under such severe competition, the company should promptly

    establish the marketing research. Increasing the contentment and loyalty to the

    customer is the main issue for the company.

    In this research, we study the people who lived in North, Middle Southern, with

    the experience using communication software before. We apply the stratified

    sampling to collect data on online questionnaire. Furthermore, in the basis of

    DeLone and McLean (2003) information system success of model and Wang (2008)

    the respecified e-commerce system success model, the research study the vital

    statistics by ANOVA then, state the influence for difference software to our study.

    We also construct suitable LISREL model to explore the relations with system

    quality, information quality, service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction

    and behavioral intention.

    This study verifies that there has the relationship of system quality, information

    quality, service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction and behavioral

    intention. Therefore, the communication software company should enhance the

    perceived value to raise the positive behavioral intention to customer. In addition,

    let the customer be loyal to the product. Finally, this study will suggest some idea

    for the future research.

    KeywordsE-commerce systems success, Information System Success Model, Linear

    Structural Relationship Model, Mobile Communication Application Software.

    http://tw.rd.yahoo.com/_ylt=A3eg.83OE4pRpHMAiI3hbB4J/SIG=12sfpnvq3/EXP=1368032334/**http%3a/tw.dictionary.yahoo.com/dictionary%3fp=prevalence%26docid=1080232http://tw.rd.yahoo.com/_ylt=A3eg.8uRFopRlhYA713hbB4J/SIG=12p9jbqvd/EXP=1368033041/**http%3a/tw.dictionary.yahoo.com/dictionary%3fp=loyalty%26docid=1060614
  • 102

  • I

    ..............................................................................................................................I

    ....................................................................................................................... III

    ....................................................................................................................... VI

    ............................................................................................................... 1

    ....................................................................................... 1

    ................................................................................................... 2

    ....................................................................................... 3

    ................................................................................................... 4

    ....................................................................................................... 6

    ................................................................................... 6

    ................................................................................................... 7

    ................................................................................................... 8

    ................................................................................................. 10

    ................................................................................................. 18

    ......................................................................................... 21

    ................................................................................................. 23

    ................................................................................. 25

    ..................................................................................................... 29

    ................................................................................................. 29

    ................................................................................................. 30

    ................................................................. 31

    ................................................................................................. 33

    ................................................................................................. 37

    ......................................................................................... 40

    ..................................................................................................... 49

  • II

    ................................................................................................. 49

    ................................................................................................. 52

    ......................................................................................... 52

    ..................................................................................... 54

    ................................................................................................. 59

    ................................................................................................. 64

    ............................................................................................. 69

    ................................................................................. 79

    ......................................................... 86

    ........................................................................................ 93

    ................................................................................................. 93

    ................................................................................................. 95

    ................................................................................................. 97

    ................................................................................................................... 98

    ......................................................................................................................... 107

  • III

    2-1 .................................................................................... 8

    2-2 .................................................................................... 9

    2-3 ...................................................................................... 12

    2-4 PZB .......................................................................... 13

    2-5 .............................................................................. 14

    2-6 eTailQ .......................................................................... 16

    2-7 E-S-QUAL ................................................................... 17

    2-8 E-RecS-QUAL ............................................................ 17

    2-9 .......................................................................................... 20

    2-10 ........................................................................ 22

    2-11 ........................................................ 25

    3-1 ...................................................................................... 30

    3-2 .................................................................................. 34

    3-3 .................................................................................. 34

    3-4 .................................................................................. 35

    3-5 .................................................................................. 35

    3-6 .......................................................................... 36

    3-7 .................................................................................. 37

    3-8 .................................................................................................. 40

    3-9 Cronbachs .................................................................... 41

    3-10 KMO ................................................................................... 42

    4-1 .................................................................................. 51

    4-2 .................................................................................. 51

    4-3 .................................................................................. 52

    4-4 ...................................................... 52

  • IV

    4-5 ...................................................................................... 53

    4-6 .............................................................. 55

    4-7 .............................................................. 55

    4-8 .............................................................. 56

    4-9 .............................................................. 57

    4-10 .................................................... 58

    4-11 ............................................................ 58

    4-12 ................................................................ 59

    4-13 ................................................................ 60

    4-14 ................................................................ 61

    4-15 ................................................................ 62

    4-16 ................................................................ 63

    4-17 ................................................................ 64

    4-18 ........................................ 66

    4-19 ............................................................................ 67

    4-20 ............................................................................ 69

    4-21 ........................................ 70

    4-22 ................ 70

    4-23 ................................................................ 71

    4-24 ........................................ 71

    4-25 ........................................ 72

    4-26 ........................................ 72

    4-27 ................................................................ 73

    4-28 ........................................ 73

    4-29 ........................................ 74

    4-30 ........................................ 74

  • V

    4-31 ................................ 75

    4-32 ................................................................ 75

    4-33 ................................ 76

    4-34 .................................................... 76

    4-35 ............................ 77

    4-36 ........................................................ 77

    4-37 ................................ 78

    4-38 ........................................................ 78

    4-39 ................................ 78

    4-40 ............................................................................ 80

    4-41 ............................................................................ 81

    4-42 ........................................................ 82

    4-43 .................................................................... 82

    4-44 ................................................................ 83

    4-45 ................................................................ 84

    4-46 .................................................................... 85

    4-47 ........................................................ 88

    4-48 ................................................................................ 89

    4-49 ............................................................................ 90

    4-50 ............................................................................ 90

    4-51 .................................................................... 91

    4-52 ........................................................................ 92

    4-53 ........................................................................ 92

  • VI

    1-1 .................................................................................................... 5

    2-1 PZB .......................................................................... 11

    2-2 .......................................................................... 14

    2-3 .. 19

    2-4 .......................................................................... 20

    2-5 .......................................................................... 24

    2-6 .............................................................. 24

    2-7 DeLone and McLean (1992) .................................... 26

    2-8 DeLone and McLean (2003) ........................ 27

    2-9 Wang (2008) ................................................. 27

    3-1 .................................................................................................. 29

    3-2 .............................................................................................. 38

    3-3 .......................................................................................... 48

    4-1 .............................................................................. 65

    4-2 ...................................................... 67

    4-3 ...................................................... 68

    4-4 ...................................................................................... 80

    4-5 ...................................................... 83

    4-6 LINE .................................................................... 87

    4-7 WhatsApp ............................................................ 88

  • 1

    3G4GWiFiWiMax

    IDC 2012

    221 0.8%

    1.1%(Feature Phone)

    3(Smart Phone)

    165

    22.6% 61.5%

    (NCC) 2011 4

    2,886 25

    102 71.1%

    2,053

    FIND 2012

    VoIP

    e-mail

  • 2

    24

    LINEWhatsAPP

    Cardozo (1965)

    DeLone and McLean (2003)

    Wang (2008)

  • 3

    (TWNIC)2012

    12

    77.37% 70.25% 66.14%

    66.16% 63.81%

    LINE WhatsApp

    (FIND) 2012 4

    76%AppGoogle Play

    47.3% App Store 34.1% Andorid

    iOS Google Play

    http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=332
  • 4

    App Store

    WhatsApp LINE

  • 5

    1-1

  • 6

    3G Wi-Fi

    (Mobile Application, App)

    800 80-90%

    (2012)

    (2011)

    Apple

    App Store Google Android Market

    SMS

    WhatsApp LINE

    Whatsapp 2009

    5 3

    LINE NHN 2011 6 23

    QR Code bump

    LINE

  • 7

    App

    DeLone and McLean (1992)

    Seddon (1997)

    (bugs)Kim et al. (2009)

    (Bailey and Pearson,

    1983; DeLone and McLean, 1992; Lin and Lu, 2000; Seddonm, 1992; Srinivasan,

    1985)

    DeLone and McLean (1992)

    18

    McKinney and Yoon (2002)

    2-1

  • 8

    2-1

    Bailey and Pearson 1983

    Barti and Huff 1985

    Belardo et al. 1982

    Mahmood 1987

    Srinivasan 1985

    DeLone and McLean 1992

    Doll and Torkzadeh 1998

    DeLone and McLean 2003

    Wixom and Todd 2005

    Wang 2008

    DeLone and McLean (1992)

    DeLone and McLean (1992)

    DeLone and McLean (1992)

    Seddon and Kiew (1994)

    Wolfinbarger and Gilly (2001)

  • 9

    Lee et al. (2002)

    Bailey and Pearson (1983)

    Chae and Kim (2001)

    McKinney and Yoon (2002)

    (Ives et al., 1983; Baroudi and Orlikowski, 1988; Doll et al., 1994)

    Barnes and Vidgen (2007)

    2-2

    2-2

    Ives et al. 1983

    Mahmood 1987

    King and Epstein 1983

    Miller and Doyle 1987

    Srinivasan 1985

    Doll and Torkzadeh 1988

  • 10

    2-2 ()

    DeLone and McLean 1992

    DeLone and McLean 2003

    Wixom and Todd 2005

    Wang 2008

    DeLone and McLean (1992)

    DeLone and McLean (1992)

    Juran (1986)

    ()

    1980

  • 11

    (Lehtinen and

    Lehtinen 1982; Parasuraman et al. 1985 ;Sasser et al. 1978)

    () PZB

    Parasuraman et al. (1985)

    2-1

    2-1 PZB

    Parasuraman et al. (1985)

    ( 5)

    (

    ( 4)

    ( 3)

    ( 2) ( 1)

  • 12

    2-3

    2-3

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    (2012)

    () SERVQUAL

    SERVQUAL Parasuraman et al. 1988

    1985

    97

    5 22 2-4

  • 13

    2-4 PZB

    PZB

    (1985)

    PZB

    (1988)

    /

    (2009)

    ()

    SERVQUAL

    SERVQUAL

    (Meuter

    et al., 2000)

    Zeithaml et al. (2000)

    (

    )()

    ()

    Zeithaml et al. (2002) Parasuraman et al. (1985)

    2-2

  • 14

    2-2

    Zeithaml et al. (2002)

    Zeithaml et al. (2002)

    (2003)

    2-5

    2-5

    1

    /

  • 15

    2-5 ()

    2

    3

    4

    (2003)

    ()

    Loiacono et al. (2000)

    12 WebQual

    Wolfinbarger and Gilly (2003)

    eTailQ 14 2-6

  • 16

    2-6 eTailQ

    (

    )

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    Wolfinbarger and Gilly (2003)

    Parasuraman et al. (2005) eTailQ

    eTailQ

    Parasuraman et al. (2005)

    2002 e-SERVQUAL

    amazon.com walmart.com

    E-S-QUAL E-RecS-QUALE-S-QUAL

    22 2-7

  • 17

    2-7 E-S-QUAL

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    6.

    7.

    8.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    6.

    7.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    Parasuraman et al. (2005)

    E-RecS-QUAL

    2-8

    2-8 E-RecS-QUAL

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

  • 18

    2-8 E-RecS-QUAL ()

    1.

    2.

    3.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    Parasuraman et al. (2005)

    Wolfinbarger and Gilly (2003) eTailQ Parasuraman et

    al. (2005) E-S-QUALE-RecS-QUAL

    Parasuraman et al. (2005) Wolfinbarger and Gilly (2003)

    Scitovszky (1945)

    Monroe and Krishnan (1985) 2-3

  • 19

    2-3

    Zeithaml (1988)

    Sheth et al. (1991)

    2-4

  • 20

    2-4

    Sheth et al. (1991)

    Sweeny and Soutar (2001) Sheth et al. (1991)

    1

    2

    3

    4

    2-9

    2-9

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    6.

    7.

    8.

    9.

  • 21

    2-9 ()

    10.

    11.

    12.

    13.

    14.

    15.

    16.

    17.

    18.

    19.

    Sweeny and Soutar (2001)

    Sweeny and Soutar

    (2001)

    (Anderson and Sullivan 1993; Oliver 1980, 1993)

    Cyert and March (1963)

  • 22

    Ives et al. (1983)

    Oliver (1981)

    Bailey and Pearson (1983)

    Bailey and Pearson (1983)

    (2-1)

    n

    j ijijiWRS

    1

    iS ji ijR ij ijW

    Bailey and Pearson (1983) 22

    36

    39

    2-10

    2-10

    Bailey and Pearson 1983

    39 (

    EDP )

    Bhattacherjee 2001

    Chin 1988 QUIS (Questionnaire for User Interface

    Satisfaction)

    (2-1)

  • 23

    2-10 ()

    DeLone and McLean 1992

    Doll and Torkzadeh 1988 EUC 5

    Galleta and Lederer 1989 (EDP

    )

    Gelderman 1997

    Ives et al. 1983

    Bailey and Pearson 39

    13 (

    )

    McKeen et al. 1994 8 151

    Neumann and Segev 1980

    (2009)

    Bhattacherjee (2001)

    Ajzen and Fishbein (1975)(TRA)

    Olson and Peter (1987)

    Engel et al. (1995) 2-5

  • 24

    2-5

    Parasuraman et al. (1996)

    2-6

    Parasuraman et al. (1996)

    13

    13 2-11 (loyalty)

    (switch)(pay more)(external response)(internal

    response)

    2-6

    Parasuraman et al. (1996)

    +$

    -$

  • 25

    2-11

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    6.

    7.

    8.

    9.

    10.

    11.

    12.

    13.

    (2012)

    Parasuraman et al. (1996)

    DeLone and McLean

    DeLone and McLean (1992) 1981 1987

    Shannon and Weaver (1949) Mason (1978)

    180

    (Information System Success Model) 2-7

  • 26

    2-7 DeLone and McLean (1992)

    DeLone and McLean (1992)

    DeLone and McLean

    Pitt et al. (1995)

    Seddon and Kiew

    (1996)

    DeLone and McLean (2003) 2-8

    1992

  • 27

    2-8 DeLone and McLean (2003)

    DeLone and McLean (2003)

    Wang (2008) DeLone and McLean (2003)

    2-9

    DeLone and McLean (2003) Seddon (1997)

    2-9 Wang (2008)

    Wang (2008)

  • 28

    DeLone and McLean (2003)

    Wang (2008)

  • 29

    DeLone and McLean (2003)

    Wang (2008)

    3-1

    3-1

  • 30

    3-1

    3-1

  • 31

    DeLone and McLean (1992)

    DeLone and McLean (1992)

    Parasuraman et al. (2005) E-S-QUAL Wolfinbarger

    and Gillye (2003) TailQ

    ()

    ()

    ()

  • 32

    ()

    ()

    Sweeny and Soutar (2001)

    ()

    ()

    ()

    ()

    Bhattacherjee (2001)

    Parasuraman et al. (1996)

    ()

    ()

    ()

    ()

    ()

  • 33

    Likert

    1 5

    C

    LINEWhatsApp

    ()

    DeLone and McLean (1992)

    3-2

  • 34

    3-2

    01. App A01

    02. App A02

    03. App A03

    04. App A04

    05. App A05

    06. App A06

    ()

    DeLone and McLean (1992)

    3-3

    3-3

    01. App B01

    02. App B02

    03. App (

    ) B03

    04. App B04

    05. App

    () B05

    06. App B06

    ()

    Parasuraman et al. (2005) E-S-QUALWolfinbarger and

    Gilly (2003) TailQ

  • 35

    3-4

    3-4

    01. App C01

    02. App C02

    03. App C03

    04. App C04

    05. App

    C05

    06. App C06

    07. App ( FAQ

    ) C07

    08. App C08

    09. App

    () C09

    ()

    Sweeny and Soutar (2001)

    3-5

    3-5

    01. App D01

    02. App D02

    03. App D03

    04. App D04

    05. App

    D05

    06. App D06

    07. App D07

    08. App D08

    09. App D09

  • 36

    3-5 ()

    10. App D10

    11. App D11

    12. App D12

    13. App D13

    14. App D14

    15. App D15

    16. App D16

    17. App D17

    18. App D18

    19. App D19

    ()

    Bhattacherjee (2001)

    3-6

    3-6

    01. App E01

    02. App(

    ) E02

    03. App E03

    04. App E04

    05. App E05

    ()

    Parasuraman et al. (1996)

  • 37

    3-7

    3-7

    01.

    App F01

    02. App F02

    03. App F03

    04. App

    App F04

    05. App F05

    06. App F06

    07. App

    App F07

    08. App

    F08

    09. App

    F09

    10. ()

    App F10

    11. ()

    F11

    12. ()

    F12

    3-2

  • 38

    3-2

    (2013)

    Cochran (1977)

    384

  • 39

    (n)

    112

    11

    12

    d

    Z

    N

    d

    Z

    n

    n Z d N P

    0.5 P(1-P)

    22,542,942 =0.05

    d=0.05 n384

    (Personal interview)(telephone interview)

    (mail questionnaire survey)(computer interview)

    (Internet survey)

    3-8

  • 40

    3-8

    102/03/12-102/03/22 102/04/01~102/04/25

    30

    439

    30

    439 48

    391 89.07%

    Likert

    5 4 3 2

    1 SPSS 19.0 AMOS 20.0

    (Reliablity)

    (Internal Reliablity)

  • 41

    (External Reliablity)

    Cronbachs

    ()

    Cronbach 1951 Cronbachs

    21

    2

    11

    H

    n

    i i

    s

    s

    n

    n

    n i

    Cronbachs Cronbachs

    (1990)

    3-9

    3-9 Cronbachs

    Cronbachs

    < 0.3

    0.3 < 0.4

    0.4 < 0.5

    0.5 < 0.7

    0.7 < 0.9

    0.9

    (1990)

    Likert

    2is

    2Hs

  • 42

    KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy)

    Bartletts (Bartletts test of Sphericity)

    KMO Kaiser 1974

    0 1 1

    Kaiser (1974) KMO 3-10

    3-10 KMO

    KMO

    0.90KMO (marvelous)

    0.80KMO

  • 43

    (Varimax Rotation) (Factor

    Loading) Hair et al. (1987) 0.5

    (Validity)

    (Content Validity)(Criterion Validity)

    (Construct Validity) (Convergent

    Validity)(Discriminant Validity)

    ()

    ()

    (2007)

    1

    1

    1(Chi-square difference test)

    =3.84

    ()

    20501 .,

  • 44

    (CFA) Marsh and Hocevar (1985)

    (target coefficient) CFA()

    CFA()

    1.0

    ()

    Fornell and Larcker (1981)

    0.5 t 2

    (Analysis of Variation,ANOVA)

    (Multivariate

    Analysis of Variance, MANOVA)

    BoxM

    Wilks Lambda

    Pillais trace

    Pillais trace

    (Olson1976)

  • 45

    LISREL(Linear Structure Relation) SEM

    (Structural equation model)LISREL

    LISREL

    LISREL

    LISREL LISREL

    ()

    LISREL

    (Measurement Model)(Structural Equation Model)

    ()

    ()

    () LISREL

    LISREL (2007)

    1.

    (1) /

    Hair et al. (1998)

    Hair et al. (1998)

    3

  • 46

    (2) GFIAGFI

    GFI(Goodness-of-Fit Index)AGFI(adjusted Goodness-of-Fit

    Index)

    0 1 GFI GFI

    GFI

    AGFI GFIAGFI

    GFI GFI AGFI

    1u and Bentler (1999)

    GFI AGFI 0.9

    (3) RMR(Root Mean Squares Residual)

    RMR

    21

    1 1

    2

    1

    2

    /r

    i

    r

    j

    ijij

    rr

    sRMR

    r x y

    RMRRMR

    0 Bagozzi and Yi (1988)

    RMR 0.05

    (4) RMSEARoot Mean Square Error of Approximation

    RMSEA

    0

    )1(

    2

    nk

    kmaxRMSEA

    RMSEA RMSEA RMR

    RMR RMSEA

    Browne and Cudeck (1993)

    ijs ij

  • 47

    RMSEA 0.05 RMSEA 0.05-0.08

    RMSEA 0.1

    2.

    Composite Reliability

    Variance Extracted

    2

    2

    CR

    2

    2

    VE

    (2007)

    0.7 0.7 0.5

    3.

    R2 R2

    R2

    (2007) R2 0.3

    (2009) 3-3 AB

    CA BB C

    a A B a

  • 48

    A B

    3-3

    (2009)

    3-3 A B C

    Sobel (1982) A C a x

    b = c

    2222b

    saasbcs

    as bs a b cs c

    csc t csc A C

    A B C

    A B C a b

    2n,t

  • 49

    43948

    391

    SPSS 19.0AMOS 20.0

    102/03/12-102/03/22

    30

    (2006)(corrected item-to-total correlation)

    0.3

    KMOBartlett

    A

    ()

    A-1A-2A-3

  • 50

    A-5

    0.3Cronbachs

    ()

    A-46

    0.3613

    AppApp

    App

    AppApp

    App

    AppApp

    App

    AppApp

    AppApp

    ()

    A-65

    0.357

    App

    App

    AppApp

    App

    App()

    ()

    () Cronbachs

    Cronbachs Cronbachs

  • 51

    4-1(1990)

    0.7050.8970.914

    4-1

    Cronbachs

    Cronbachs

    57 0.897 46 0.914

    6 0.831 6 0.831

    6 0.705 6 0.705

    9 0.817 9 0.817

    19 0.811 13 0.853

    5 0.783 5 0.783

    12 0.720 7 0.817

    4-2 Kaiser (1974)

    Bartlett (1951)

    KMO 0.6 Bartlett P 0.05

    4-2

    KMO Bartlett P

    0.742

  • 52

    102/04/01~102/04/25

    391

    4-3(1990)

    0.7220.920

    4-3

    Cronbachs

    46 0.920

    6 0.738

    6 0.730

    9 0.820

    13 0.883

    5 0.800

    7 0.722

    4-4

    LINEWhatsApp94.1%5.9%

    4-4

    (%)

    LINE 368 94.1

    WhatsApp 23 5.9

  • 53

    4-5

    48.3%51.7%2029

    76.0%2012.0%

    57.3%

    9.5%9.0%10,000

    53.2%10,00019,99920,00029,999

    11.3%10.7%

    70.8%5-6

    13.8%

    4-5

    (%)

    189 48.3

    202 51.7

    20 47 12.0

    20-29 297 76.0

    30-39 40 10.2

    40-49 6 1.5

    50-59 1 0.3

    224 57.3

    35 9.0

    37 9.5

    1 0.3

    18 4.6

    8 2.0

    34 8.7

    5 1.3

    5 1.3

    6 1.5

    18 4.6

    224 57.3

  • 54

    4-5 ()

    (%)

    10,000 208 53.2 10,000-19,999 44 11.3

    20,000-29,999 42 10.7

    30,000-39,999 35 9.0

    40,000-49,999 34 8.7

    50,000 28 7.2

    277 70.8

    5-6 54 13.8

    3-4 38 9.7

    1-2 20 5.1

    1-3 2 0.6

    4-6

    App4.32

    App3.86

    0.7163.86

  • 55

    4-6

    01. App 3.94 0.678

    02. App

    4.16 0.715

    03. App

    3.86 0.716

    04. App 4.32 0.594

    05. App 4.23 0.573

    06. App 4.29 0.576

    4-7

    App4.02

    App3.52

    App

    0.719

    4-7

    01. App 3.69 0.644

    02. App 3.52 0.667

    03. App(

    ) 3.85 0.719

    04. App 3.67 0.688

    05. App

    () 3.93 0.580

    06. App 4.02 0.614

    4-8

    3.17

  • 56

    App

    3.72App3.17

    0.919

    4-8

    01. App 3.17 0.919

    02. App

    3.43 0.850

    03. App 3.72 0.706

    04. App 3.26 0.747

    05. App

    3.35 0.756

    06. App 3.38 0.709

    07. App

    (FAQ) 3.27 0.671

    08. App

    3.33 0.672

    09. App

    () 3.26 0.654

    4-9

    App4.32

    App3.81

    App

    App

    0.7390.726

  • 57

    4-9

    01. App 4.02 0.614

    02. App 4.11 0.631

    03. App

    4.01 0.616

    04. App

    4.01 0.603

    05. App

    4.29 0.725

    06. App

    4.39 0.597

    08. App

    3.98 0.652

    11. App 3.92 0.726

    12. App

    4.10 0.739

    13. App 4.22 0.693

    14. App 3.81 0.674

    15. App 3.89 0.607

    16. App 3.98 0.521

    4-10

    App4.04

    App3.79

    0.697

    4.04

    0.562

  • 58

    4-10

    01. App 3.88 0.568

    02. App(

    ) 3.79 0.697

    03. App 4.04 0.678

    04. App 3.99 0.622

    05. App

    4.04 0.562

    4-11

    App4.12

    0.586

    ()3.30

    0.892

    4-11

    01.

    App 3.86 0.712

    02.

    App 4.02 0.692

    03.

    App 4.01 0.687

    04. App

    App 4.06 0.708

    05.

    App 4.12 0.586

    11. ()

    3.66 0.802

    12. ()

    3.30 0.892

  • 59

    KMOBartlett

    Kaiser (1974)1

    0.5

    Parasuraman et al. (2005)Wolfinbarger

    and Gilly (2003)

    39

    KMO0.8

    Kaiser (1974)Bartlett1452.70

    36P0.001

    9

    4-121

    73.602%

    4-12

    (%) (%)

    1 3.792 42.132 42.132

    2 1.737 19.303 61.435

    3 1.095 12.168 73.602

    4-13

    0.7450.5

  • 60

    App

    AppApp

    AppApp

    App

    App

    App

    ()App(FAQ

    )

    Parasuraman et al. (2005)Wolfinbarger and

    Gilly (2003)

    3

    4-13

    05. App

    0.865

    3.792 42.132 04. App

    0.811

    06. App

    0.795

    02. App

    0.879

    1.737 61.435 01. App 0.874

    03. App 0.752

    08. App

    0.869

    1.095 73.602

    09.

    App(

    )

    0.819

    07. App

    (FAQ) 0.745

  • 61

    Sweeny and Soutar (2001)

    4

    13

    KMO

    0.859Kaiser (1974)Bartlett

    2240.3578P0.001

    13

    4-141

    68.812%

    4-14

    (%) (%)

    1 2.626 20.202 20.202

    2 2.230 17.156 37.358

    3 2.113 16.256 53.614

    4 1.976 15.198 68.812

    4-15

    0.6240.5

    App

    App

    AppApp

    App

    AppApp

    AppApp

    App

    App

  • 62

    App

    App

    5App

    Sweeny and Soutar (2001)

    Sweeny and Soutar (2001)

    4

    4-15

    03. App

    0.794

    2.626 20.202

    04. App

    0.787

    02. App

    0.726

    01. App 0.710

    15. App 0.787

    2.230 37.358 14. App 0.775

    16. App

    0.773

    12. App

    0.829

    2.113 53.614 13. App 0.746

    11. App

    0.661

    06. App

    0.798

    1.976 68.812 05. App

    0.714

    08. App

    0.624

  • 63

    Parasuraman et al. (1996)

    27

    KMO

    0.843Kaiser (1974)Bartlett

    1075.27621P0.001

    74-161

    66.518%

    4-16

    (%) (%)

    1 3.412 48.745 48.745

    2 1.244 17.773 66.518

    4-17

    0.7530.5

    App

    AppAppApp

    App

    App

    ;(

    )()

    App

    Parasuraman et al. (1996)

  • 64

    4-17

    02.

    App 0.879

    3.412 48.745

    03.

    App 0.878

    04. App

    App

    0.824

    01.

    App 0.787

    05.

    App 0.753

    12. (

    ) 0.790

    1.244 66.518 11. (

    ) 0.782

    App

    0.661P0.0010

  • 65

    1

    (2007)

    (1)(1)

    3.84

    4-1585.62

    373.383.84

    4-1

    4-18

    3.84

    Unstandardized estimators

    =29.455df=8P

  • 66

    4-18

    29.455 216.426 186.971

    8.181 231.699 223.518

    24.786 203.453 178.667

    219.145 300.759 81.614

    208.305 384.555 176.250

    205.988 402.710 196.722

    47.454 125.945 78.491

    31.763 148.215 116.452

    19.189 134.299 115.110

    40.666 63.972 23.306

    Fornell and Larcker (1981)

    0.5t2

    Marsh and Hocevar (1985)

    (

    )1.0

    ()

    60.8014-2

    (B-1)

    1.0

  • 67

    4-2

    t4-19

    0.5t2

    4-19

    t

    C01 0.794

    C02 0.892 14.106

    C03 0.619 11.941

    C04 0.783

    C05 0.799 14.715

    C06 0.773 14.399

    C07 0.750

    C08 0.805 13.243

    C09 0.748 13.799

    standardized estimators

    =60.801df=24P

  • 68

    ()

    333.549

    341.320

    4-3(B-2)

    0.9771.0

    4-3

    standardized estimators

    =341.320df=61P

  • 69

    t4-20

    0.5t2

    4-20

    t

    D01 0.645

    D02 0.661 11.071

    D03 0.825 13.065

    D04 0.852 13.292

    D05 0.646

    D06 0.706 10.396

    D08 0.693 10.290

    D11 0.698

    D12 0.732 11.914

    D13 0.759 12.181

    D14 0.715

    D15 0.775 12.642

    D16 0.744 12.361

    (MANOVA)

    BoxM

    Wilks'

    LambdaPillais trace

    Olson (1976)Pillais trace

    4-21

  • 70

    4-21

    BoxM

    p Wilks Lambd PillaisTrace P

    39.070 0.028 0.01 0.698

    32.589 0.107 0.989 0.648

    2.616 0.870 0.991 0.332

    10.489 0.460 0.933 WhatsApp

    0.034 0.854

    4-23

  • 71

    4-23

    BoxM

    p Wilks Lambd PillaisTrace P

    41.492 0.006 0.065

    1.301 0.255

    5.689 0.018 >

    0.007 0.935

    8.676 0.003 >

    ()

    4-25

  • 72

    FP0.05

    4-25

    F P

    8.595 0.004 >

    4.665 0.031 >

    0.475 0.491

    ()

    4-26F

    P0.05

    4-26

    F P

    8.655 0.003 >

    1.253 0.264

    50

    2020-29

    30-3940-4950-5960

    4-27

  • 73

    4-27

    BoxM

    p Wilks Lambd PillaisTrace P

    55.491

  • 74

    4-29

    F P

    6.152 0.014 >

    11.828 0.001 >

    4.229 0.040 >

    ()

    4-30

    FP0.05

    4-30

    F P

    2.391 0.123

    10.799 0.001 >

    0.505 0.478

    0.013 0.910

    ()

    4-31

    FP0.05

  • 75

    4-31

    F P

    2.351 0.126

    8.611 0.004 >

    7.287 0.007 >

    1.992 0.159

    57.3%

    4-32

    4-32

    BoxM

    p Wilks Lambd PillaisTrace P

    28.888 0.129 1.849 0.089

    38.828 0.012 1.554 0.160

    28.727

  • 76

    4-33

    F P

    0.335 0.563

    1.228 0.269

    5.871 0.016 >

    0.014 0.906

    4-34

    4-34

    BoxM

    p Wilks Lambd PillaisTrace P

    188.538

  • 77

    4-35

    F P

    3.062 0.010 (5)>(1)(5)>(2)

    0.876 0.497

    2.842 0.016 (3)>(2)

    1.075 0.374

    1.743 0.124

    0.590 0.707

    (1) 10,000(2)10,000~19,999(3)20,000~29,999

    (5) 40,000~49,999

    4-36

    4-36

    BoxM

    p Wilks Lambd PillaisTrace P

    98.964 0.011 0.072 0.251

    91.253 0.037 0.074 0.219

    17.747 0.517 0.961 0.221

    27.237 0.680 0.949 0.208

    42.280 0.101 0.940 0.096

    14.843 0.106 0.954 0.020

    4-37F

    P0.05

    3-4

  • 78

    4-37

    F P

    3.668 0.006 >3-4

    0.936 0.443

    4-38

    4-38

    BoxM

    p Wilks Lambd PillaisTrace P

    78.056 0.001 0.054 0.046

    64.177 0.021 0.025 0.643

    18.557 0.106 0.975 0.139

    23.528 0.282 0.987 0.744

    18.851 0.552 0.975 0.278

    17.872 0.007 0.008 0.523

    4-39

    FP0.05

    4-39

    F P

    2.088 0.125

    2.062 0.129

  • 79

    4-39 ()

    F P

    0.932 0.395

    1.869 0.156

    3.529 0.030 >

    4.076 0.018 >

    13

    D01D02D03D04

    D01 D03 X1D02 D04 X2

    D05D06D08 D05 D08

    X1 D06 X2

    D11D12D13 D12 X1 D11 D13

    X2 D14D15D16

    D14 D16 X1D15 X2

    4-40

  • 80

    4-40

    X1 A01A03A05

    X2 A02A04A06

    X3 B01B03B05

    X4 B02B04B06

    X5 C01C03C05C07C09

    X6 C02C04C06C08

    Y1 D01D03D05D08D12D14D16

    Y2 D02D04D06D11D13D15

    Y3 E01E03

    Y4 E02E04

    Y5 F01F03F05F12

    Y6 F02F04F11

    4-4

    4-4

  • 81

    (2007)

    ()

    GFIAGFI

    RMRRMSEA4-41

    RMSEA0.050.05-0.08

    Browne and Cudek (1993)

    4-41

    / 0.9 0.945

    AGFI >0.9 0.905

    RMR

  • 82

    4-42

    X1 0.729 0.468

    0.712 0.553 X2 0.757 0.426

    X3 0.851 0.276

    0.769 0.626 X4 0.726 0.472

    X5 0.874 0.237

    0.893 0.807 X6 0.923 0.149

    Y1 0.948 0.101

    0.930 0.870 Y2 0.917 0.159

    Y3 0.787 0.381 0.771 0.627

    Y4 0.797 0.364

    Y5 0.873 0.239

    0.803 0.672 Y6 0.763 0.418

    ()

    (2007)(R2)

    0.3

    4-4331.4%

    62.9%

    58.4%0.3

    4-43

    R2

    0.314

    0.629

    0.584

    4-5

  • 83

    4-5

    ()

    4-440.05

    4-44

    P

    0.514

  • 84

    ()

    Sobel (1982)

    4-45

    4-45

    0.326 5.77*

    0.194 3.82*

    0.056 1.86*

    0.159 3.96*

    0.095 3.13*

    0.075 2.72*

    0.102 3.31*

    0.061 2.78*

    0.041 2.14*

    (*)t0.05,389=1.645

    4-46

    0.466

    0.126

  • 85

    0.2570.189

    0.1750.111

    0.6350.393

    0.422

    0.2960.236

    0.163

    0.181

    0.111

    0.1160.268

    0.236

    0.1810.116

    0.661

    0.422

    4-46

    0.466 0.257 0.175

    0.466 0.257 0.175

    0.126 0.189 0.111 0.635

    0.296 0.163 0.111

    0.422 0.352 0.222 0.635

    0.393 0.422

    0.236 0.181 0.116 0.268

    0.236 0.181 0.116 0.661 0.422

  • 86

    AMOS 20.0

    AMOS 20.0

    (1) Measurement weights

    (2) Measurement intercepts

    (3) Structural Weights

    (4) Structural intercepts

    (5) Structural means

    (6) Structural Covariances

    (7) Structural Residuals

    (8) Measurement Resuduals

    (2007)

  • 87

    Little

    (1997)NFIIFIRFI

    TLI0.05

    4-6a1_1 ~a6_1LINE b1_1~b9_1LINE

    vvv1_1~ vvv3_1 LINE

    vv1_1 ~vv3_1 LINE v1_1 ~v12_1LINE

    4-6 LINE

  • 88

    4-7a1_2 ~a6_2WhatsAppb1_2~b9_2

    WhatsAppvvv1_2~ vvv3_2WhatsApp

    vv1_2 ~vv3_2WhatsAppv1_1 ~v12_1

    WhatsApp

    4-7 WhatsApp

    4-470.05vs

    vsP

    0.05NFIIFIRFITLI0.05

    4-47

    P NFI IFI RFI TLI

    7.426 6 0.283 0.003 0.003 -0.003 -0.003

    11.600 9 0.237 0.004 0.005 -0.003 -0.004

    11.943 3 0.008* 0.005 0.005 0.003 0.003

    7.996 3 0.046* 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.001

    12.692 12 0.392 0.005 0.005 -0.005 -0.005

    (*)P0.05

  • 89

    4-48

    0.05vsP

    0.05NFIIFIRFITLI0.05

    4-48

    P NFI IFI RFI TLI

    12.538 6 0.016* 0.006 0.006 0.001 0.002

    5.120 9 0.824 0.002 0.002 -0.007 -0.007

    2.843 3 0.416 0.001 0.001 -0.001 -0.002

    7.717 3 0.052 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.001

    19.475 12 0.078 0.007 0.008 -0.002 -0.002

    (*)P0.05

    2020-29

    30-3940-49

    50-5960

    4-49

    0.05vs

    vsP0.05NFI

    IFIRFITLI0.05

  • 90

    4-49

    P NFI IFI RFI TLI

    6.558 6 0.364 0.002 0.003 -0.002 -0.002

    6.201 9 0.720 0.002 0.002 -0.005 -0.005

    2.516 3 0.472 0.001 0.001 -0.001 -0.001

    11.244 3 0.010* 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003

    27.631 12 0.006* 0.011 0.011 0.003 0.003

    (*)P0.05

    4-500.05vs

    vs

    vsP0.05NFIIFIRFI

    TLI0.05

    4-50

    P NFI IFI RFI TLI

    8.551 6 0.200 0.003 0.003 -0.002 -0.002

    17.949 9 0.036* 0.007 0.007 0.000 0.000

    0.771 3 0.856 0.000 0.000 -0.003 -0.003

    9.181 3 0.027* 0.003 0.004 0.001 0.001

    30.759 12 0.002* 0.011 0.012 0.002 0.003

    (*)P0.05

    1000010000-1999920000-29999

  • 91

    30000-3999940000-4999950000

    4-510.05

    vsvs

    P0.05NFIIFIRFITLI

    0.05

    4-51

    P NFI IFI RFI TLI

    6.585 6 0.361 0.002 0.003 -0.002 -0.003

    12.358 9 0.194 0.005 0.005 -0.002 -0.002

    0.500 3 0.919 0.000 0.000 -0.002 -0.002

    11.080 3 0.011* 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003

    30.912 12 0.012* 0.012 0.012 0.004 0.004

    (*)P0.05

    1-35-6

    3-41-21-3

    4-520.05

    P0.05NFIIFIRFITLI0.05

  • 92

    4-52

    P NFI IFI RFI TLI

    2.973 6 0.812 0.001 0.001 -0.005 -0.005

    7.166 9 0.620 0.003 0.003 -0.005 -0.005

    4.474 3 0.215 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.000

    4.637 3 0.200 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.000

    13.814 12 0.313 0.005 0.006 -0.003 -0.003

    (*)P0.05

    4-530.05vs

    P0.05NFIIFIRFITLI0.05

    4-53

    P NFI IFI RFI TLI

    20.114 12 0.065 0.007 0.008 0.000 0.000

    18.563 18 0.419 0.007 0.007 -0.005 -0.006

    9.612 6 0.142 0.004 0.004 0.000 0.000

    10.688 6 0.098 0.004 0.004 0.000 0.000

    39.732 24 0.023* 0.015 0.016 0.000 0.000

    (*)P0.05

    P

    NFIIFIRFITLI

  • 93

    391

    9 LINE

    20 29

    10,000

    App

    3

  • 94

    Parasuraman et al. (2005) Wolfinbarger and Gilly

    (2003)

    Sweeny and Soutar (2001) Sweeny and Soutar

    (2001)

    Parasuraman et al. (1996)

  • 95

    App

  • 96

    App

    LINE

    WhatsApp LINE

    WhatsApp Android BlackBerry iOS

    1

    App

    LINE

    WhatsApp WeChatM+ Messenger Cubie

    Parasuraman et al. (1996)

  • 97

    bbs mySurvey

    Likert

  • 98

    1. (2009)

    2. (2013 3 )

    http://statis.moi.gov.tw/micst/stmain.jsp?sys=100

    3. (2009)

    4. (1990)

    5. (2011)

    6. (2006)SPSS

    7. FIND (Foreseeing Innovative New Digiservices)

    (2012 10 3 )2012

    http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=335

    8. FIND (Foreseeing Innovative New Digiservices)

    (2012 9 12 )

    http://www.taifo.com.tw/DB/Research/201212171128412174931.pdf

    9. FIND (Foreseeing Innovative New Digiservices)

    (2012 9 18 )2011 4

    http://www.taifo.com.tw/DB/Research/201210251726040228233.pdf

    10. (2012 3)2012

    http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20120709c.pdf

    11. (2003)

  • 99

    12. (2012)

    2012 12 31

    http://news.cnyes.com/Content/20121231/KFOLPX9BKTK46.shtml

    13. (2005)

    14. (2007)

    15. (International Data Corporation, IDC)(2012 6 11)

    2012

    www.idc.com.tw/about/399.html

    16. (2012)

    17. (2004)

  • 100

    1. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An

    introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    2.Anderson, E. W. and Sullivan, M. W. (1993).The antecedents and

    consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science, 12(2) ,

    125-143.

    3. Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation

    models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94.

    4. Bailey, J. E. and Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring

    and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5),

    530-545.

    5. Barnes, S. J. and Vidgen, R. (2007). Interactive e-government: Evaluating the

    web site of the UK inland revenue. International Journal of Electronic

    Government Research, 3(1), 19-37.

    6. Baroudi, J. J. and Orlikowski, W. J. (1998). A short-form measure of user

    information satisfaction: A psychometric evaluation and note on use. Journal of

    Measurement Information Systems, 4(4), 44-59.

    7. Barti, H. and Huff, S. (1985). Change, attitude to change, and decision support

    system success. Information and Management, 9(5), 261-268.

    8. Bartlett, M. S. (1951). The Goodness of Fit of a Single Hypothetical

    Discriminant Function in the Case of Several Groups. Annuals of Eugenics, 16,

    199-214.

    9. Belardo, S., Karwan, K. R. and Wallace, W.A. (1982). DSS component design

    through field experimentationAn application to emergency management.

    Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Systems,

    93-108.

    10. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An

    expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 15 (3), 351-370.

    11. Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit.

  • 101

    In K.A. Bollen, & J.S. Long (eds.),Testing structural equation models,136-162.

    Newbury Park, CA:Sage.

    12. Cardozo, R. (1965). An Experimental Study of Customer effort, Expectation

    and Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 2, 244-249.

    13. Chae, M. and Kim, J. (2001). Information quality for mobile Internet services: a

    theoretical model with empirical validation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second

    International Conference on Information Systems, 43-53.

    14. Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A. and Norman, K. L. (1988). Development of an

    instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface.

    Proceedings of SIGCHI, 88, pp. 213-218, New York: ACM.

    15. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. New York, John Wiley & Sons

    Inc.

    16. Cronbach, L. J. ( 1951 ). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.

    Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

    17. Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm.

    Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New York.

    18. DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The

    quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3 (1), 60-95.

    19. DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of

    information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management

    Information Systems, 19 (4), 9-30.

    20. Doll, W. J. and Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing

    satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259-274.

    21. Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D. and Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer Behavior,

    8th

    ed., New York: The Drydden, 368.

    22. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models

    with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing

    Research, 18(3), 39-50.

    23. Galletta, D.F. and Lederer, A.L. (1989). Some Cautions on the Measurement of

    User Information Satisfaction. Decision Sciences, 20(3), 419-438.

  • 102

    24. Gelderman, M. (1997). The Relation between user satisfaction, usage of

    information systems and performance. Information and Management, 34(1),

    11-18.

    25. Hair, J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate

    Data Analysis(5th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: prentice-Hall.

    26. Hu, L. T. and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance.

    Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.

    27. Ives, B., Olsen, M. and Baroudi, J.J. (1983). The measurement of user

    information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 26(10), 785-793.

    28. Juran, J. M. (1986). Universal Approach to Managing for Quality. Quality

    Progress, 19-24.

    29. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1),

    31-36.

    30. Kim, C., Oh, E., Shin, N. and Chae, M. (2009). An empirical investigation of

    factors affecting ubiquitous computing use and U-business value. International

    Journal of Information Management, 29(6), 436-448.

    31. King, W. R., and Epstein, B. (1983). Assessing information system value.

    Decision Sciences, 14(1), 34-45.

    32. Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). AIMQ: A

    methodology for information quality assessment. Information and Management,

    40(2), 133-146.

    33. Lehtinen, U. and Lehtinen, J. R. (1982). Service Quality: A Study of Quality

    Dimension, Helsinki: Service Management Institute.

    34. Lin, C. C. and Lu, H. (2000). Towards an Understanding of the Behavioural

    Intention to Use a Web Site. International Journal of Information Management,

    20(3), 197-208.

    35. Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures(MACS) analysis of

    cross-cultural data : Practice and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral

    Research, 32, 53-76.

    36. Loiacono, E.T., Watson, R.T. and Goodhue, D.L. (2000). Webqual: a web site

  • 103

    quality instrument. Working Paper 2000-126-0, University of Georgia.

    37. Mahmood, M. A. (1987). System Development Methods A Comparative

    Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 293-311.

    38. Marsh, H. W. and Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmator factor

    analysis to the study of self-concept : First and higher order factor models and

    their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletion, 97(3), 562-582.

    39. Mason, R.O. (1978). Measuring information output: A communication systems

    approach. Information & Management, 1(5), 219-234.

    40. McKeen, J. D., Guimaraes, T. and Wetherbe, J. C. (1994). The Relationship

    between user participation and user satisfaction:An investigation of four

    contingency factors. MIS Quarterly, 427-451.

    41. McKinney, V. and Yoon, K. (2002). The measurement of web-customer

    satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems

    Research, 13 (3), 296-315.

    42. Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I. and Bitner, M. J. (2000).

    Self-Service Technologies:Understanding Customer Satisfaction with

    Technology-Based Service Encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 50-64.

    43. Miller, J. and Doyle, B. A. (1987). Measuring the Effectiveness of

    Computer-Based Information Systems in the Financial Services Sector. MIS

    Quarterly, 11(1), 107-117.

    44. Monroe, K. B. and Krishnan, R. (1985). The effect of price on subjective

    product evaluations, perceived quality: How consumers view stores and

    merchandise (pp.209-232). In J. Jacoby, and J. Olsion (Eds.), Lexington, MA:

    D. C. Heath.

    45. Neumann, S. and Segev, E. (1980). Evaluate your information system. Journal

    of systems management , 31(3), 34-41.

    46. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model for the Antecedents and Consequences

    of Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469.

    47. Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Processes in

    Retailing Setting. Journal of Retailing, 57(3), 25-48.

  • 104

    48. Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, Affective, and Attribute Bases of the

    Satisfaction Response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 418-430.

    49. Olson, C. L. (1976). On choosing a test statistic in multivariate analysis of

    variance. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 579-586.

    50. Olson, J. C. and Peter, J. P. (1987). Consumer Behavior: Marketing strategy

    perspective. Illinois: Irwin.

    51. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model

    of Service Quality and Its Implication for Future Research. Journal of

    Marketing, 49 (4), 41-50.

    52. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A

    Multipleitem Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality.

    Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 12-40.

    53. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. L. (1991). Refinement and

    Reassessment of The SERVQUAL Scale. Journal of Retailing, 67 (4), 420-450.

    54. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. L. (1996). The Behavioral

    Consequences of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, 60, 31-46.

    55. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A

    Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality. Journal of

    Service Research, 7 (3), 213-233.

    56. Pitt, L.F., Watson, R.T. and Kavan, C.B. (1995). Service quality: A measure of

    information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 173-188.

    57. Sasser, W. E., Olsen, R. P. and Wyckoff, D. D. (1978).Management of Srvice

    Operations, Text and Cases, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 33-54.

    58. Scitovszky, T. (1945). Some Consequences of the Habit of Judging Quality by

    Price. Review of Economics Studies. 12(4), 100-105.

    59. Seddon, P. B. and Kiew, M. Y. (1994). A Partial Test and Development of

    DeLone and McLean's Model of IS Success, The Australian Journal of

    Information Systems, 4 (1), 90-109.

    60. Seddon, P. B. and Kiew, M. Y. (1996). A partial test and development of the

    DeLone and McLeans model of IS success. Australian Journal of Information

  • 105

    System, 4(1), 90-109.

    61. Seddon, P. B. (1997). A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and

    McLean Model of IS Success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240-253.

    62. Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of

    Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    63. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., and Gross, B. L. (1991). Why We Buy What We

    Buy: A Theory of Consumption Value. Journal of Business Research, 22,

    159-170.

    64. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Symptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in

    Structural Equations Models. Sociological methodology, 13, 290-312.

    65. Srinivasan, A. (1985). Alternative measures of system effectiveness:

    Associations and implications. MIS Quarterly, 9(3), 243-253.

    66. Sweeney, J. C. and Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer Perceived Value: The

    Development of a Multiple Item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77, 203-220.

    67. Wang, Y. S. (2008). Assessing e-commerce systems success: a respecification

    and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information

    Systems Journal, 18 (5), 529-557.

    68. Wixom, B. H. and Todd, P. A. (2005). A Theoretical Integration of User

    Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1),

    85-102.

    69. Wolfinbarger, M. and Gilly, M. C. (2001). Shopping online for freedom, control,

    and fun.California Management Review, 43(2), 34-55.

    70. Wolfinbarger, M. and Gilly, M. C. (2003). eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring

    and predicting etail quality. Journal of Retailing, 79 (3), 183-198.

    71. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality and Value: A

    Means- End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2-22.

    72. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A. and Malhotra, A. (2000). e-Service

    Quality:Definition, Dimensions and Conceptual Model. Working Paper.

    Marketing Science Institute. Cambridge, M.A.

    73. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A. and Malhotra, A. (2002). Service Quality

  • 106

    Delivery Through Web Sites: A Critical Review of Extant Knowledge. Journal

    of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (4), 362-375.

  • 107

    A

    A-1

    Cronbach's

    01. App 0.649 0.794

    02. App 0.637 0.803

    03. App

    0.656 0.794

    04. App 0.581 0.816

    05. App

    0.677 0.788

    06. App 0.532 0.823

    A-2

    Cronbach's

    01. App 0.608 0.608

    02. App

    0.607 0.604

    03. App(

    ) 0.384 0.681

    04. App

    0.361 0.700

    05. App

    () 0.310 0.702

    06. App

    0.401 0.681

  • 108

    A-3

    Cronbach's

    01. App 0.582 0.794

    02. App

    0.603 0.787

    03. App 0.555 0.795

    04. App 0.553 0.794

    05. App

    0.678 0.776

    06. App 0.489 0.802

    07. App (

    FAQ ) 0.330 0.818

    08. App

    0.510 0.802

    09. App

    () 0.392 0.812

    A-4

    Cronbach's

    01. App 0.443 0.801

    02. App 0.471 0.799

    03. App

    0.540 0.794

    04. App 0.510 0.796

    05. App

    0.472 0.797

    06. App 0.465 0.800

    07. App 0.247 0.809

    08. App 0.524 0.794

    09. App 0.285 0.807

  • 109

    A-4 ()

    Cronbach's

    10. App 0.198 0.816

    11. App 0.542 0.794

    12. App

    0.456 0.798

    13. App 0.382 0.802

    14. App 0.492 0.795

    15. App 0.580 0.790

    16. App 0.726 0.787

    17. App 0.033 0.831

    18. App 0.225 0.816

    19. App 0.293 0.808

    A-5

    Cronbach's

    01. App 0.420 0.785

    02. App(

    ) 0.529 0.752

    03. App 0.674 0.700

    04. App 0.589 0.732

    05. App

    0.586 0.734

  • 110

    A-6

    Cronbach's

    01.

    App 0.450 0.692

    02.

    App 0.735 0.653

    03.

    App 0.612 0.663

    04. App

    App 0.388 0.699

    05.

    App 0.420 0.699

    06.

    App 0.247 0.718

    07. App

    App 0.174 0.727

    08. App

    0.160 0.730

    09. App

    0.071 0.744

    10. ()

    App 0.208 0.720

    11. ()

    0.681 0.652

    12. ()

    0.310 0.710

  • 111

    B

    B-1

    standardized estimators

    =60.801df=24P

  • 112

    B-2

    standardized estimators

    =333.549df=59P

  • 113

    C

    1.

    LINE LINE

    WhatsApp WhatsApp

    App

    [email protected]

  • 114

    01. App

    02. App

    03. App

    04. App

    05. App

    06. App

    App

    01. App

    02. App

    03. App (

    )

    04. App

    05. App

    ()

    06. App

  • 115

    App

    01. App

    02. App

    03. App

    04. App

    05. App

    06. App

    07. App (

    FAQ )

    08. App

    09. App

    ()

    App

    01. App

    02. App

    03. App

    04. App

    05. App

    06. App

  • 116

    07. App

    08. App

    09. App

    10. App

    11. App

    12. App

    13. App

    14. App

    15. App

    16. App

    17. App

    18. App

    19. App

    App

    01. App

    02. App(

    )

    03. App

    04. App

    05. App

  • 117

    App

    01.

    App

    02.

    App

    03.

    App

    04. App

    App

    05.

    App

    06.

    App

    07. App

    App

    08. App

    09. App

    10. ()

    App

    11. ()

    12. ()

    1.

    2.

    20 20-29 30-39 40-49

    50-59 50-59

  • 118

    3.

    4.

    5-6 3-4

    1-2 1-3

    5. App

    10,000 10,000 ~19,999

    20,000 ~29,999 30,000 ~39,999

    40,000 ~49,999 50,000

    6. ?

    ()

    ()

    ()

    ~~