A N N UA L P R O G R E S S R E P O R T

2018

A N N U A L P R O G R E S S R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

L O C A L S O L U T I O N S T O P O V E R T Y

2019

The World Bank

LOCAL SOLUTIONS TO POVERTY

The World Bank Office Jakarta

Indonesia Stock Exchange Building, Tower II/12th Floor

Jl. Jend. Sudirman kav. 52-53

Jakarta 12190

P (6221) 5299-3000

F (6221) 5299-3111

W www.localsolutionstopoverty.org

This publication is a product of the Local Solutions to Poverty Facility.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The material in this publication is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge,

this publication may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is

given. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of

The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved.

A N N U A L P R O G R E S S R E P O R T 2 0 1 8

L O C A L S O L U T I O N S T O P O V E R T Y

April 15, 2019

This Annual Report is meant specifically for members of the Steering Committee (SC),

Technical Secretary (TS) and Working Group of the Local Solutions to Poverty (LSP) Multi

Donor Trust Fund (MDTF), which inter alia, include officials of the Government of Indo-

nesia, Donors and the World Bank.

The SC is chaired by the Deputy Minister for Regional Development at the Indonesian

National Development Planning Agency (BAPPENAS). Government representatives in

the SC include the Deputy Minister for Human Development, Deputy Minister for Devel-

oping Financing and Director for Disadvantaged Regions, Transmigration and Villages

at BAPPENAS. Other representatives in the SC include the Australian Government’s

Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) as Donor and the International Bank for

Reconstruction and Development (IBDR/World Bank) as Administrator.

Government representatives in the Technical Secretary consist of the Director for Dis-

advantaged Area, Transmigration and Villages, Director for Community Health and Nu-

trition, and Director for Poverty Reduction and Social Welfare at BAPPENAS.

Government representatives in the Working Group consist of relevant national min-

istries or agencies, including but not limited to BAPPENAS, Coordinating Ministry for

Human Development and Culture, Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Ministry

of Village and TNP2K. Representatives of other donors or government programs may

be invited to participate in the Working Group to provide technical input.

The World Bank submits the Annual Progress Report of this Trust Fund to the above

partners and World Bank management and staff as part of its Administrative Agreement

with Donors. As such, report distribution is only for the afore-mentioned recipients.

i CONTENTS

Table of Contents01 Executive Summary 1

02 Introduction 4

03 LSP Context 5

10

25

39

04

05

06

3.1 The LSP MDTF 5

3.2 Operating Context 5

3.3 LSP MDTF’s Operational Framework: Theory-of-Change and Programs 8

4.1 Outcome 1: Strengthened local framework and systems to improve governance and

downward accountability to communities 11

4.2 Outcome 2: Communities have more effective and structured participation at the village-level 134.3 Outcome 3: Local governments have development plans and budgets

that better reflect community needs, including women and poor people 20

5.1 Outcome 1: Strengthened national framework and systems for tracking village finances and outputs 27

5.2 Outcome 2: Pilot villages demonstrate finance allocation that is equitable, needs based and pro-poor 32

5.3 Outcome 3: Village communities and government have improved capacity to manage increased finances 33

5.4 Outcome 4: Data-driven planning and budgeting at the local-level is strengthened 34

6.1 Outcome 1: Beneficiaries experience increased equity of access to services 40

6.2 Outcome 2: Beneficiaries increasingly utilize services 43

6.3 Outcome 3: Beneficiaries have improved quality of education and health services 47

Progress towards EOFO One: Local Governments Become More Responsive and Inclusive

Progress towards EOFO Two: National and Local Governments Make Better Use Fiscal Resources

Progress towards EOFO Three: Beneficiaries Receive Improved Basic Service Delivery

i iCONTENTS

07 Gender and Social Inclusion 51

09 Annexes 60

5608 Key Challenges and Future Priorities8.1 Key Challenges, Responses and Lessons 56

8.2 Future priorities for 2019 59

Annex 1: LSP Monitoring and Evaluation Approach 60

Annex 2: MDTF Efficiency and Financial Update 63

Annex 3: LSP Activity Tracker 70

Annex 4: LSP Knowledge Products and Publication 100

List of Figures Figure 1: LSP’s Key Milestones and Achievements in 2018 3

Figure 2: LSP MDTF 5Figure 3: LSP’s Broader Goal, EOFOs and Six Approaches 8Figure 4: LSP’s Major EOFO 1 Milestones during January to December 2018 11Figure 5: Women, Men and the Poor Households’ Participation under Generasi 16

Figure 6: Perbups of Head of District Letters Issued in Generasi Locations 21

Figure 7: Bursa Inovasi Desa in 2018 23

Figure 8: LSP’s Major EOFO 2 Milestones during January to December 2018 26

Figure 9: LSP’s Major EOFO 3 Milestones during January to December 2018 40

Figure 10: Scaling of DIklat Berjenjang 43

Figure 11: KIAT Guru Capacity Building Training 49

Figure 12: LSP’s Theory-of-Change 62

Figure 13: LSP’s Activity Progress during January and December 2018 63

Figure 14: Share of Funds Contributed to LSP in 2018 66

Figure 15: MDTF DIsbursement History 66

i i i CONTENTS

List of Boxes

List of Tables

Box 1: LSP Remains a Highly Relevant Investment 7

Box 2: Influencing Policy Change - The KIAT Guru Pilot 12

Box 3: Proposed New Village Operation 15

Box 4: The GoI’s HDW Pilot - Empowering Local Actors to Drive Village-Level Stunting Prevention 17

Box 5: LSP is Informing MoV’s Scaling of the HDW Pilot in 2019 and Beyond 18

Box 6: Finalizing the NatStrat Stunting and INEY PforR Operation to Improve the Quality of Nearly US$4

Billion in Annual GoI Spending to Tackle Stunting 19

Box 7: From Indonesia to the World: Innovative Villages 23

Box 8: Engaging the Private Sector and Utilizing Technologies to Drive Service Delivery and Village Development

Improvements 24

Box 9: Sustainable Investments 37

Box 10: The MoEC’s Diklat Berjenjang Program Received the UNESCO - Hamdan bin Rashid Al-Maktoum Prize 41

Box 11: Sukabumi Districts - Sustaining the ECED Pilot’s Training Mechanism in Regular Village Law Processes 42

Box 12: LSP Supports the GoI to Raise Awareness about, and Build Momentum for, Indonesia’s Multi-sectoral

Approach to Preventing Stunting 45

Box 13: Bringing Together High-Level Government Actors to Tackle Stunting: ‘Aiming High: Indonesia’s

Ambition to Reduce Stunting Book’ Launch 46

Box 14: Sharing KIAT Guru’s Lessons and Experiences Internationally and Domestically 48

Box 15: Strong Local Commitment to Sustain the KIAT Guru Pilot 49

Box 16: Remote West Kalimantan Village Running KIAT Guru Program Independently 50

Box 17: Analyzing Indonesia’s Civil Service Database to Improve Public Service Delivery and Development

Effectiveness 53

Table 1: LSP’s Key Programs and Activities 9

Table 2: Pledges and Contributions from 2008 to 2018 65

Table 3: Financial Status Summary (US$) 65

Table 4: Program Expenditures by Executing Agency (US$) 67

ivABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Alokasi Afirmasi Affirmative Allocation

ADD Alokasi Dana Desa (Village Funds Allocation)

APBDes Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Desa

(Village Budget)

BaKTI Bursa Pengetahuan Kawasan Timur

Indonesia

Balitbangkes Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan

Kesehatan (National Institute of Health

Research and Development)

Bappenas Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan

Nasional / Badan Perencanaan Pemba-

ngunan Nasional (National Development

Planning Agency)

Bappeda Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan

Daerah (Regional Development Planning

Agency)

BCC Behavior Change Communication

BCS Budget Classification Structures

BID Bursa Inovasi Desa (Village Innovation

Exchange)

BKAD Badan Kerjasama Antar Desa

(Inter-Village Cooperation Agency)

BKN Badan Kepegawaian Negara (National

Civil Service Agency)

BPKP Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan

Pembangunan (Finance and Development

Supervisory Agency)

BPD Badan Permusyawaratan Desa

(Village Council)

BPS Badan Pusat Statistik (Statistics Indonesia)

BTOR Back to Office Report

CDD Community Driven Development

CEM Community Empowerment Mechanism

CGAP Country Gender Action Plan

CMU Country Management Unit

CoA Chart of Accounts

CSO Civil Society Organization

DAK Fisik Dana Alokasi Khusus Fisik (Physical

Special Allocation Fund)

Dana Desa Village Funds

DFAT Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

DG Directorate General

DGTEP Directorate General for Teachers and Edu-

cation Personnel – Ministry of Education

and Culture

DHO District Health Office

Diklat Berjenjang Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Berjenjang (ECED

Professional Development Program)

Dinas PMD Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa

(Village Community Development Office)

Direktorat GTK Directorate of ECED Teachers

DJ Bangda Direktorat Jenderal Bina Pembangunan

Daerah, Kementerian Dalam Negeri

(Directorate General of Regional Develop-

ment Oversight, Ministry of Home Affairs)

DJ Bina Pemdes Direktorat Jenderal Bina Pemerintahan

Desa, Kementerian Dalam Negeri (Direc-

torate General for Village Government

Oversight, Ministry of Home Affairs)

DJPK Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan

Kementerian Keuangan (Directorate General

of Fiscal Balance, Ministry of Finance)

DJ PPMD Direktorat Jenderal Pembangunan dan

Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa –

Kemendesa PDTT (Directorate General Vil-

lage Community Development and Empow-

erment – Ministry of Village, Development of

Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration)

DOK Dana Operasional Kegiatan (Activities

Operational Fund)

DPC Donor Partner Center

ECED Early Childhood Education and Development

EOFO End-of-Facility Outcome

ETP Executive Training Program

FGD Focus Group Discussion

FM Financial Management

GDP Gross Domestic Product

GESI Gender Equality and Social Inclusion

GFF Global Financing Facility

GoI Government of Indonesia

GoA Government of Australia

GMT Grand Master Trainer

GTK Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan (Teacher

and Education Workforce)

PAUD Dikmas

v ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS

HCI Human Capital Index

HDW Human Development Worker

HIMPAUDI Himpunan Pendidik dan Tenaga

Kependidikan Anak Usia Dini Indonesia

(Association of Indonesian Early Child-

hood Educators and Education Personnel)

HLM4 Fourth High Level Meeting

IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and

Development

ICR Implementation Completion Report

IE Impact Evaluation

IEQ Indonesia Economic Quarterly

IG Inspectorate General

ILO International Labor Organization

IMF International Monetary Fund

INEY Investing in Nutrition and Early Years

IPC Inter-Personal Communication

ISM Implementation Support Mission

ISR Implementation Status Report

JIT Just-In-Time

J-PAL Jameel Poverty Action Lab

Kabupaten District

Kecamatan Sub-district

KDP Kecamatan Development Program

Kemenko PMK Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Pemba-

ngunan Manusia dan Kebudayaan (Coor-

dinating Ministry for Human Development

and Culture)

KemenPANRB Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur

Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi (Ministry

of Empowerment of State Apparatus and

Bureaucratic Reform)

KIAT Guru Kinerja dan Akuntabilitas Guru (Teachers’

Performance and Accountability)

KOMPAK Kolaborasi Masyarakat dan Pelayanan

untuk Kesejahteraan (Australia-Indonesia

Government Partnership)

KPL Kelompok Pengguna Layanan

(User Committee)

KPMD Kader Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa

(Village Community Empowerment Cadre)

viABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS

KSI Knowledge Sector Initiative

LAD Lembaga Adat Desa (Village Customary

Institutions)

LAN Lembaga Administrasi Negara

(State Administration Institution)

LED Local Economic Development

LG Local Government (Pemerintah Daerah)

LKD Lembaga Kemasyarakatan Desa (Village

Community Institutions)

LSD Local Service Delivery

LSP Local Solutions to Poverty

MAHKOTA Menuju Masyarakat Indonesia yang Kokoh

dan Sejahtera (Towards a Strong and Pros-

perous Indonesian Society Program)

MAMPU Maju Perempuan Indonesia (Australia-In-

donesia Partnership for Gender Equality

and Women’s Empowerment)

MCA-I Millennium Challenge Account-Indonesia

M&E Monitoring and Evaluation

MDTF Multi-Donor Trust Fund

MELAYANI Menguraikan Permasalahan Perbaikan

Layanan Dasar di Indonesia (Untangling

Problems to Improve Basic Services in

Indonesia)

MEL Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning

MELE Measuring Early Learning Environments

MIS Management Information System

MoEC Ministry of Education and Culture

MoF Ministry of Finance

MoH Ministry of Health

MoHA Ministry of Home Affairs

MoSA Ministry of Social Affairs

MoV Ministry of Villages, Development of Dis-

advantaged Regions and Transmigration

MT Master Trainer

Musrenbangdes Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan

Desa (Village Planning and Development

Meeting)

NatStrat Stunting National Strategy to Accelerate Stunting

Reduction

Nawa Cita President Widodo’s national development

agenda

NMC National Management Consultant

NPUB Naskah Perjanjian Urusan Bersama (Joint

Agreement)

OJT On the Job Training

OM-SPAN Online Monitoring Sistem Perbenda-

haraan dan Anggaran Negara (Online

Monitoring for Treasury System and Na-

tional Budget)

PASA Programmatic Advisory Services and

Analytics

PAD Program Appraisal Document

Pamsimas Penyediaan Air Minum dan Sanitasi

Berbasis Masyarakat (Water Supply and

Sanitation for Low Income Communities)

PAUD Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini (Early Child-

hood Education)

PDIA Problem-Driven Iterative Approach

PDP Pendamping Desa Pemberdayaan

(Village Empowerment Facilitator)

PDTI Pendamping Desa Teknik Infrastruktur

(Village Infrastructure Engineering Facilitator)

Peduli Australian-Indonesian Government Part-

nership for Social Inclusion Improvement

PEKKA Pemberdayaan Perempuan Kepala Ke-

luarga (The Female-Headed Household

Empowerment Program)

PER Public Expenditure Review

Perbup Peraturan Bupati (District Head Regulation)

ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMSvi i

Pemdes Pemerintah Desa (Village Government)

Perpres Peraturan Presiden (Presidential Regulation)

Permendagri Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri (Minister

of Home Affairs Regulation)

Permendes Peraturan Menteri Desa (Minister of Vil-

lage’s Regulation)

PforR Program-for-Results

PGDON Penanganan Gawat Darurat Obstetri dan

Neonatal (Obstetric and Neonatal Emer-

gency Treatment)

PLD Pendamping Lokal Desa (Village Facilitator)

PMK Peraturan Menteri Keuangan (Minister of

Finance Regulation)

PNPM Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Mas-

yarakat (National Community Empower-

ment Program)

PPM Pay-for-Performance-Mechanism

PODES Potensi Desa (Village Potential Statistics)

Posyandu Pos Pelayanan Terpadu (Village Health

Clinics)

Puskemas Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat (Community

Health Center)

PSF PNPM Support Facility

Pusdatin Pusat Data dan Informasi (Center of Data

and Information)

RIA Regulatory Impact Assessment

RISE Research on Improving Systems of Education

RKPDes Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Desa (Village

Government Work Plan)

RPJMN Rancangan Pembangunan Jangka Me-

nengah Nasional (National Medium-Term

Development Plan)

SDG Sustainable Development Goals

SEAMEO CCEP Southeast Asian Ministers of Education

Organization Center of Early Childhood

Care Education and Parenting

SIPD Sistem Informasi Pembangunan Desa

(Village Development Information System)

Sipades Sistem Pengelolaan Aset Desa (Village

Asset Management Application)

Siskeudes Sistem Keuangan Desa (Village Finance

System)

SOP Standard Operating Procedure

SoVP Secretariat Office of the Vice President

SPAN State Treasury System and the State Budget

SPC Significant Policy Change

SUSENAS Survey Sosial Ekonomi Nasional (National

Social and Economic Survey)

TA Technical Assistance

TAPMD Tenaga Ahli Pemberdayaan Masyarakat

Desa (Expert Staff for Village Community

Empowerment)

TIK Tim Inovasi Kabupaten (District Innovation

Team)

TKG Tunjangan Khusus Guru (Teachers’ Spe-

cial Allowance)

TNP2K Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulan-

gan Kemiskinan (National Team for the

Acceleration of Poverty Reduction)

TPG Tunjangan Profesional Guru (Teacher’s

Professional Allowance)

TPID Tim Inovasi dan Pemberdayaan Desa (Vil-

lage Empowerment and Innovation Team)

ToC Theory of Change

ToT Training of Trainers

TSP Technical Service Provider

UB Urusan Bersama (Share Agreement)

UNESCO The United Nations Educational, Scientific

and Cultural Organization

UNICEF The United Nations International Chil-

dren’s Emergency Fund

USAID United States Agency for International

Development

VfM Value for Money

VFM Village Financial Management

VIG Village Innovation Grants

VIP Village Innovation Program

ViPER Village Public Expenditure Review

WASH Water, Sanitation and Hygiene

1EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ExecutiveSummary

The Government of Indonesia (GoI) continues to strengthen its emphasis on

building human capital and local economic development, particularly in rural

areas. Over the past two decades, Indonesia has taken great strides in reducing

poverty. However, in recent years, the country’s Gini index – which is a measure

of inequality – has shown only small reductions from 0.41 (2013) to 0.39 (2017).1 In

recognition of this, the GoI is increasingly concentrating its efforts to promote more

inclusive growth and to reduce inequality. Furthermore, over the past 18 months, the

GoI has also increasingly focused on strengthening its own existing systems to ac-

celerate human capital development, prevent stunting, and to maximize the Village

Law’s performance across nearly 75,000 Indonesian villages.2

The Local Solutions to Poverty (LSP) Multi-Donor Trust Fund (MDTF) is well posi-

tioned to support the GoI to achieve these goals. The LSP MDTF (or LSP Facility)

mobilizes the World Bank’s Indonesia and global experience, networks, and con-

vening power to support the GoI to improve the quality of lives of poor and vul-

nerable Indonesians by improving basic service delivery and village development.

Specifically, LSP supports the GoI by: (1) undertaking and disseminating rigorous im-

pact evaluations and analytics; (2) informing and promoting evidence-based policy

decisions, agendas, and systems reforms; (3) providing enhanced implementation

support to assist the GoI deliver complex and innovative operations and pilots; and

(4) supporting collaboration and knowledge exchange among international, nation-

al, and sub-national actors.

Building on LSP’s support from previous years, in 2018, the Facility made several

major contributions to the GoI’s development priorities and efforts, including:

1. Supporting the GoI to refine, launch and initially roll out its National Strategy

to Accelerate Stunting Reduction (NatStrat Stunting)3 and to maximize the im-

pact of over US$ 3.5 billion (Rp 51.9 trillion) in annual spending on stunting

prevention interventions.4 Indonesia’s stunting rate is very high — more than

one in every three Indonesian children (about 31 percent) are stunted. Stunted

children are prone to learning difficulties, illness and poverty, which in the long

run can hinder a country’s economic growth, labor market productivity and in-

equality. Building on earlier support, in 2018, LSP supported the Vice President’s

Office (SoVP), the National Team for the Acceleration of Poverty Reduction (Tim

Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan, or TNP2K) and the National

Development Planning Agency (Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasi-

onal/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, or Bappenas) to finalize the

GoI’s ambitious NatStrat Stunting (2018-2024), which was launched in November

2018. Together with MAHKOTA-TNP2K, LSP assisted the 10 participating GoI min-

1 The World Bank. 2018. Indonesia Economic Quar-terly: Strengthening Competitiveness (December 2018). Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/indonesia/publication/indonesia-eco-nomic-quarterly-reports.2 The Village Law No. 6/2014 was enacted in early 2014 and established a new institutional frame-work for community development across Indo-nesia’s 74,957 rural villages. The law significantly increased the authority and responsibility of vil-lages, and the fiscal resources (transfers, namely Dana Desa and Alokasi Dana Desa) available to them.3 The NatStrat Stunting better coordinates and in-tensifies the GoI’s nutrition related interventions. See Box 6 on p. 19 for further details.4 Throughout the progress report, the conversion from US Dollar (US$) to Indonesian Rupiah (Rp) is US$ 1 = Rp 14,481.

01

2

istries5 to identify key results, set agreed targets and priori-

tize technical support. To support the NatStrat Stunting, the

GoI requested World Bank support to develop a US$ 400

million results-based operation — Investing in Nutrition and

Early Years (INEY) — that will support and incentivize key

results needed to prevent stunting. Finalized at a May 2018

ministerial meeting, which was chaired by the Indonesian

Vice President, the INEY Operation builds upon and insti-

tutionalizes lessons learned from LSP-supported work. For

example, the operation adopts lessons from the Generasi

Project’s facilitation model, citizen empowerment tools and

Village Law integration work, the Early Childhood Education

and Development (ECED) Frontline Pilot’s district-based

community-focused training system, and the Human De-

velopment Worker (HDW) Pilot’s village-level convergence

model.

2. Scaling up initiatives to improve the quality of and access

to rural education services. Since 2009, the GoI has allo-

cated 20 percent of the national budget for education. To

maximize the impact of these resources and improve rural

education services, LSP, along with a USAID trust fund, sup-

ported the Ministry of Education and Culture (MoEC) and

TNP2K to complete the Improving Teacher Performance

and Accountability (KIAT Guru) Pilot in 203 pilot schools

across five disadvantaged districts. The pilot rigorously

tested treatments — different combinations of community

empowerment and tying payment of rural teacher allowanc-

es to teacher presence and performance — and evaluated

the results. In 2018, LSP supported MoEC to issue two le-

gally-binding regulations to enable the pilot’s ongoing im-

plementation, completed the pilot’s impact evaluation, and

provided technical support to national and district counter-

parts to enhance the pilot’s implementation and sustain-

ability. Results from the impact evaluation indicate that the

pilot has improved teacher presence, teacher service qual-

ity, parental efforts, and student learning outcomes. Given

these positive results, the GoI committed to scaling the KIAT

Guru Pilot (via KIAT Guru Phase 2) across a greater area

and to test the KIAT Guru mechanisms in secondary ed-

ucation and urban locations during 2019. LSP also contin-

ued to support the GoI’s internationally-recognized ECED

Frontline Pilot, which established a district-based training

system to deliver professional training to over 15,000 ECED

teachers. Initial results from ECED Frontline Pilot’s evalua-

tions indicate that the pilot’s training mechanism improves

beneficiaries’ access to trained ECED teachers, improves

teacher competency, and is ‘scalable’.6 In 2018, MoEC and

the Ministry of Villages (MoV) committed to scaling the ECED

Frontline Pilot’s training mechanism in support of the GoI’s

NatStrat Stunting (via the INEY PforR).

3. Supporting the GoI to adopt a peer-to-peer learning ap-

proach across Indonesia’s villages to solve local devel-

opment challenges and improve the impact of villages’

fiscal resources (i.e., village funds or Dana Desa). Building

on LSP’s previous support for the Village Innovation Pro-

gram (VIP), in 2018 the Facility supported MoV in utilizing a

peer-to-peer learning approach to help over 71,000 Indo-

nesian villages generate solutions to address local service

delivery challenges. In doing so, LSP provided technical

and implementation support to MoV to hold 426 district-lev-

el Village Innovation Forums (Bursa Inovasi Desa) in 2018,

which brought together approximately 176,000 participants

to learn from one another. MoV’s monitoring data indicates

that a significant proportion (approximately 42 percent) of

villages that participated in the 2017 Bursa Inovasi Desa

have replicated and funded innovations using their own vil-

lage plans and budgets in 2018.

4. Supporting the GoI to maximize the impact of nearly US$

7 billion (Rp 100 trillion) in village spending. The success

of the Village Law ultimately relies on the ability of village

governments to spend their increased fiscal resources ef-

fectively. In 2018, the World Bank and the Ministry of Home

Affairs (MoHA) launched preparations for the new proposed

World Bank Institutional Strengthening for Improved Village

Service Delivery Operation (or the Village Operation). The

proposed operation aims to improve the impact of the GoI’s

annual Rp 100 trillion Village Law spending by improving

village capacity and accountability to spend village funds

(Dana Desa) effectively. The new proposed Village Opera-

tion provides a platform to institutionalize and scale knowl-

edge generated through LSP’s Village Law Programmatic

Advisory Services and Analytics (PASA) (e.g., the Village

Public Expenditure Review (ViPER), Sentinel Villages Lon-

gitudinal Study, Stocktaking Review on Inclusion, etc.), op-

erational assistance and lessons from MoV’s VIP, along with

lessons from other DFAT-supported pilots and initiatives

(e.g., under KOMPAK). In 2018, the World Bank worked with

MoHA, MoV, Bappenas, the Ministry for Human Develop-

ment and Culture (Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Pem-

bangunan Manusia dan Kebudayaan, or Kemenko PMK),

and other relevant ministries to advance the operation’s

design and preparations.

From January to December 2018, the LSP MDTF disbursed

US$ 13.4 million. Meanwhile the MDTF cumulatively disbursed

US$ 328.8 million from 2007 to December 2018. These re-

sults were made possible by the support of the Australian

Government’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT)

and Millennium Challenge Account Indonesia (MCA-I).7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

5 The 10 participating ministries include SoVP, Ministry of Finance (MoF), Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Health (MoH), Ministry of Education and Cul-ture (MoEC), Ministry of Social Affairs, BPS, Bappenas, the Ministry of Villages (MoV) and Kemenko PMK.6 The evaluations also highlighted that the pilot requires strong stakeholder buy-in, coordination and supporting local regulatory frameworks to succeed.7 During the reporting period, MCA-I provided funding to the MDTF until July 2018.

3EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FIGURE 1

LSP’s Key Milestones and Achievements in 2018

• MoEC, with LSP support, established the legal framework (issued two legally-binding reg-ulations) for KIAT Guru and its performance incentives and accountability mechanism.

• LSP’s Sentinel Village Longitudinal Study generated knowledge about Village Law plan-ning, transparency & accountability practices and is being used to inform regulations and processes that improve village-level development and participation (including via the new proposed Village Operation).

• LSP supported the GoI institutionalize Generasi citizen engagement tools into regular Vil-lage Law processes (via the INEY PforR and HDW Pilot), to support the GoI’s nationwide stunting prevention efforts.

• Village governments, with LSP support (via Generasi’s HDW Pilot, the INEY PforR and VIP Operation), increasingly prioritized locally needed basic health and education services.

• LSP supported the GoI adopt a peer-to-peer learning approach to support over 71,000 Indonesian villages generate learning and innovations to address local service delivery challenges.

MORE RESPONSIVE &

INCLUSIVE LOCAL GOVERNMENT

BETTER USE OF FISCAL

RESOURCES

IMPROVED BASIC SERVICE

DELIVERY

• To enable more effective tracking and reporting of village finances and outputs, LSP sup-ported the GoI to rollout the recently issued Permendagri No. 20/2018 - the key policy guid-ing VFM across Indonesia - which was informed by LSP and KOMPAK analysis and support in 2017.

• The World Bank and the GoI launched preparation for the new proposed Village Operation - which incorporates and institutionalizes knowledge and lessons from the Village Law PASA and VIP - to improve the quality of village spending and the impact of the GoI’s US$ 7 billion in Dana Desa spending.

• The LSP-supported Special Allocation Fund (DAK) for Stunting Pilot and technical inputs informed MoF’s draft Regulation on DAK for Stunting , which incentivizes districts to con-verge delivery of nutrition interventions and maximize the effectiveness of district spend-ing.

• The LSP-supported MELAYANI Pilot generated important lessons about district problem solving, planning and budgeting practices, which will inform LSP’s support for the NatStrat Stunting (via MELAYANI Phase 2 and the INEY PforR) to improve district government capac-ity to understand and solve stunting-related issues.

• The Generasi Impact Evaluation and project data indicate that Generasi improved commu-nity utilization of health and education services and sustained the revitalization of village health clinics (Posyandu).

• The GoI and the World Bank finalized the US$ 400 million INEY PforR Operation - which institutionalizes lessons from the Generasi, HDW Pilot and ECED Pilot - to maximize the effectiveness of the GoI’s NatStrat Stunting. LSP supported the early implementation of the NatStrat Stunting via the INEY PforR Operation.

• The HDW Pilot generated significant interest, high-level commitment and initial lessons. LSP is supporting the MoV strenghten the HDW scaling (up to 75,000 HDWs) and village-level stunting convergence in 2019 and beyond.

• The GoI committed to scaling the ECED Frontline Pilot – which improved access to pro-fessionally trained ECED teachers and teacher competency – to maximize communities’ access to nutrition-sensitive ECED services. Initial results from LSP’s pilot evaluations are informing the GoI scaling efforts.

• LSP supported MoEC and TNP2K complete the KIAT Guru Pilot and impact evaluation, which helped improve teacher presence, teacher service quality, parental efforts and stu-dent learning outcomes. Given these results, the GoI committed to scaling the pilot, in 2019, to improve the quality of education services across a greater area.

4 CHAPTER TWO

Introduction02The LSP Facility is a MDTF that supports the GoI to improve the quality of life of

poor and vulnerable Indonesians through delivering local solutions to reduce

poverty and inequality. LSP assists the GoI in improving basic service delivery and

maximizing the impact of the Village Law, which affects 74,957 Indonesian villages,

by: (1) undertaking and disseminating rigorous impact evaluations and analytics; (2)

informing and promoting evidence-based policy decisions, agendas, and systems

reforms; (3) providing enhanced implementation support to assist the GoI deliver

complex and innovative operations and pilots; and (4) supporting collaboration and

knowledge exchange among international, national, and sub-national actors.

The LSP Annual Progress Report 2018 provides an update on LSP’s progress

towards its End-of-Facility Outcomes (EOFOs) and crosscutting themes, such as

gender equality and social inclusion (GESI) from January to December 2018. It

also highlights LSP’s key challenges, lessons learned, risks, and future priorities.

The report is structured around LSP’s three EOFOs:

(1) Local governments become more responsive and inclusive;

(2) National and local governments make better use of financial resources; and

(3) Beneficiaries receive improved basic service delivery.

In partnership with the Australian DFAT and the MCA-I,8 LSP is managed by the

World Bank and works with the GoI, including the Ministries of Development Plan-

ning, Finance, Home Affairs, Villages, Education and Culture, Health, along with the

Vice President’s Office and Statistics Indonesia.

8 During the reporting period, MCA-I provided funding to the MDTF until July 2018.

Economic activity in Lombok Tengah District

5CHAPTER THREE

LSP Context 03CHAPTER 3.1

The LSP MDTFLSP builds on the World Bank’s 18 years of engagement and experience with

Indonesia and its past community-driven development (CDD) programs, most

notably its predecessor the National Community Empowerment Program (Program

Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, or PNPM)9 Support Facility (PSF).

Originally established in 2007, as PSF, the MDTF was restructured in 2017 to

maximize its contributions to the GoI’s development priorities and strategies of

improving the quality of life for all Indonesians. As part of the realignment, the

MDTF’s higher-level objectives were broadened to support the GoI to reduce in-

equality, the closing date was extended from June 2018 to June 2020, its gover-

nance arrangements were streamlined, and the MDTF’s name was changed to LSP.

As of December 2018, the only remaining donor in the MDTF is the Australian DFAT.

From January to December 2018, the LSP MDTF disbursed US$ 13.4 million.

Meanwhile the MDTF cumulatively disbursed US$ 328.8 million from 2007 to De-

cember 2018 (Figure 2). (See Annex for further details about the MDTF’s Financial

Update).

CHAPTER 3.2

Operating ContextThe GoI continues to strengthen its emphasis on human development and local

economic development, particularly in rural areas. Specifically, over the past 18

months, the GoI is increasingly focusing on human capital development, accelerat-

ed efforts to prevent stunting, and the Village Law’s performance:

• Increased focus on human capital development. In April 2018, the GoI announced

it will shift its focus from pursuing infrastructure development to human capital

(e.g., through increasing investment in education, skills development, industrial

revolution technologies etc.). This shift was reflected in the President’s annual

budget speech at the House of Representatives in August 2018 and the GoI’s

2019 draft budget, which seeks to “drive investment and competitiveness through

human capital development”.10,11 In addition, in October 2018 the World Bank of-

ficially launched the Human Capital Index (HCI) at the World Bank-International

Monetary Finance (IMF) Annual Meetings in Bali, Indonesia. The HCI, which is

part of the World Bank’s Human Capital Project (launched in 2017), measures the

amount of human capital a child born today can expect to attain by the age of 18.

Indonesia is one of 28 “Early Adopter Countries” that have committed to acceler-

FIGURE 2

LSP MDTF

9 PNPM was the GoI’s flagship poverty and com-munity empowerment initiative.10 https://australiaindonesiacentre.org/highlights-human-capital-development-fo-cus-of-2019-budget-president-jokowis-indepen-dence-day-eve-speech/ 11 This agenda is supported by LSP’s INEY PforR Operation, ECED Pilot and KIAT Guru Pilot.

M D T F E S T A B L I S H E D

A S P S F

M D T F R E S T R U C T U R E D

A S L S P

C U R R E N T L S P

M D T F C L O S I N G D A T E

M D T F F U N D S P L E D G E D

& P A I D B Y D O N O R S

M D T F F U N D S D I S B U R S E D

( 2 0 0 7 - D E C 2 0 1 8 )

M D T F F U N D S D I S B U R S E D

( J A N - D E C 2 0 1 8 )

J U N E 3 0

2007

2017

2020

US$ 351 M

US$ 328.8 M

US$ 13.4 M

6

ating performance on human capital across various sectors.

• Accelerated efforts to prevent stunting. Over 2018, the GoI accelerated implemen-

tation of its national program to prevent stunting. This was evidenced by strong

high-level political commitment (including Indonesian President Joko Widodo and

Vice President Jusuf Kalla) and the GoI’s official launch of the NatStrat Stunting

(see Box 6 on p. 19), which draws on LSP’s and the World Bank’s longstanding

support for frontline service delivery.

• Increased focus on village performance. The GoI is placing a greater emphasis

on the impact of village transfers, including via the GoI’s Cash-for-Work initiative,12

the 2018 and 2019 Dana Desa Allocation Formula, and the GoI’s latest steps to

improve the capacity and accountability of village governments to use funds ef-

fectively. Further, over 2018, the GoI undertook 13 presidential visits concerning

Dana Desa to review and observe actual village development and convened

three cabinet meetings on Dana Desa (including about Dana Desa priorities, ex-

pediting transfers, and ensuring improvements to the local-scale economy).

The GoI is also paying increased attention to strengthening existing government

systems (fiscal, capacity and accountability) to drive improved village governance,

development and service delivery. For example, over 2018 the GoI began rolling

out standardized village financial management (VFM) classifications, integrating re-

porting systems, and collecting more data on village outputs to improve knowledge

on village spending, outputs, and capacity. On stunting prevention, the GoI initiated

multiple interventions (including the HDW Pilot) to encourage districts and villages

to better finance and coordinate investments and services on basic health, nutri-

tion, education, water and sanitation (WASH), ECED, and social protection using their

own funds.13 Finally, in terms of local service delivery, the GoI encouraged districts

and villages (through regulations and the Generasi-Village Law Integration work) to

prioritize health and education in their regular planning and budgeting processes.

The GoI also took important regulatory actions to reinforce KIAT Guru and to set

the stage for the GoI to expand the package of accountability mechanisms that tie

teacher allowances (special and professional allowances) to performance. Overall,

the GoI’s increasing focus on strengthening core government systems for local and

village development presents a major opportunity to support system reforms that will

leverage the GoI’s large funding streams to generate increased development impact.

The new GoI-World Bank operations and pilots provide an expanded platform

to sustain and institutionalize LSP technical assistance and knowledge through

leveraging the GoI’s large and nationwide funding streams (such as the GoI’s over

US$ 3.5 billion on stunting-related interventions, nearly US$ 7 billion on Dana Desa,

and US$ 5.6 billion on teacher special and professional allowances). These oper-

ations and pilots provide a unique opportunity to design, test and evaluate large-

scale systems improvements, drawing on LSP analytics and technical assistance, to

maximize the GoI’s stunting prevention, village development, and education service

delivery efforts. For example, the INEY Operation incorporates and institutionalizes

key lessons and best practices from the LSP-supported Generasi Project, ECED

Frontline Pilot, and HDW Pilot into the GoI’s nationwide stunting prevention efforts.

Meanwhile, the new proposed Village Operation provides a tool to institutionalize

knowledge from LSP’s Village Law PASA, operational assistance, and lessons for

MoV’s VIP, along with lessons from KOMPAK-supported pilots and support. Finally,

the proposed KIAT Guru Phase 2 provides a platform to scale the KIAT Guru mecha-

nisms across rural areas, test the mechanisms in an urban setting, and to eventually

make the GoI’s teacher special and professional allowances performance-based.

LSP CONTEXT

12 In 2018, the GoI announced the Cash-for-Work Initiative, which requires villages to

allocate a minimum of 30 percent of Dana Desa for cash-intensive work.

13 Many of these initiatives draw on LSP-sup-ported initiatives (such as Generasi, the

HDW Pilot and the ECED Frontline Pilot) and institutionalize them within the GoI’s nationwide

rollout of the NatStrat Stunting.

7CHAPTER THREE

Finally, while elections typically bring some uncertainty around the future reform agenda, LSP is well positioned to provide

technocratic, evidence-based solutions for the post-election period. LSP will contribute to the World Bank’s overall Indonesia

pre-election policy dialogue as well as preparing technocratic recommendations for the next government and National Medi-

um-Term Development Plan (Rancangan Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional, or RPJMN) for 2020 to 2024, which is

currently being drafted. To date, Bappenas has presented LSP-generated rural poverty analyses and evidence at a workshop

on background studies to inform the RPJMN preparations in November 2018.

BOX 1.

LSP Remains a Highly Relevant Investment

Alignment with the GoI: LSP directly aligns with and supports the GoI’s key agendas and priorities. At the highest level,

LSP aligns with the RPJMN 2015-2019 and the President’s Nawa Cita agenda, which aims to narrow the gaps in poverty

and development in Indonesia’s lagging regions by prioritizing village development and basic service delivery. Over

the reporting period, the GoI affirmed the importance of multiple agendas that LSP supports:

• In April 2018, the GoI instructed all relevant ministers to develop an integrated action plan with concrete outcomes

to eliminate stunting in Indonesia.14,15

• In April 2018, the Indonesian President announced that the GoI will shift its focus from pursuing infrastructure de-

velopment to human capital. This shift was reflected in the President’s annual budget speech at the House of

Representatives in August 2018 and as the theme of the GoI’s 2019 draft budget, which is to “drive investment and

competitiveness through human capital development”.16,17 Indonesia is also one of the “Early Adopter Countries” of

the World Bank’s Human Capital Index, which was officially launched at the World Bank-IMF Annual Meetings in Bali,

Indonesia in October 2018.

• In October 2018, the GoI urged local governments to use technology to develop more efficient systems to help

governments better control, monitor, and maximize the impact of local development programs, which are supported

by the Village Law.18,19

Alignment with the GoA: LSP’s mandate and strategy is also aligned with the GoA’s Aid Investment Plan for Indonesia

(2015-19), which focuses on boosting inclusive growth along with productive jobs. Specifically, LSP’s work supports

Objective 2 (Human Development for a Productive and Healthy Society) by supporting the GoI to strengthen the de-

livery and impact of large-scale initiatives aimed at improving Indonesia’s development outcomes.20 LSP also supports

Objective 3 (An Inclusive Society Through Effective Governance) by supporting initiatives and reforms that target good

governance, lagging service delivery, and transparent and inclusive development. LSP’s projects also promote more

structured village-level participation, including for women and other vulnerable groups.21

Approach to maintain relevance: LSP has a four-pronged approach to maintain relevance, including: (i) working in

close alignment with the GoI’s priorities via the Steering Committee and in close engagement with key GoI counter-

parts;22 (ii) focusing on strengthening the GoI’s policies, systems, capacities, and incentives — rather than implement-

ing on behalf of, or in parallel to, the GoI’s systems; (iii) ensuring regular engagement with other development partners;

and (iv) ensuring that PSF-LSP developed knowledge products are well disseminated, available, and easily accessible

on the LSP and World Bank websites. To ensure LSP remains flexible and adaptable, the Facility also leverages the

World Bank’s resources, networks, and comparative advantage to offer a wide variety of modalities (see Figure 3 on

p. 8 for further details about LSP’s modalities or approaches) related to governance, CDD, education, nutrition, health,

and economic opportunities.

14 http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2018/04/05/jokowi-wants-integrated-program-to-tackle-stunting.html 15 This agenda is supported LSP’s INEY PforR Operation and ECED Pilot.16 https://australiaindonesiacentre.org/highlights-human-capital-development-focus-of-2019-budget-president-jokowis-independence-day-eve-speech/ 17 This agenda is supported by LSP’s INEY PforR Operation, ECED Pilot and KIAT Guru Pilot.18 http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2018/10/22/jokowi-urges-local-govt-to-tech-up.html 19 This agenda is supported by LSP’s Village Law PASA, VIP, and proposed Village Operation.20 This is supported by LSP’s KIAT Guru Pilot and INEY PforR.21 LSP projects supporting this objective include Village Law PASA, Generasi, KIAT Guru Pilot, and INEY PforR Operation.22 During the reporting period, the LSP Steering Committee met in February 2018 to discuss LSP’s progress and to approve proposed work.

8 LSP CONTEXT

CHAPTER 3.3

LSP MDTF’s Operational Framework: Theory-of-Change and ProgramsThe LSP MDTF uses a Theory-of-Change (ToC)23 framework to clarify the pathway

between the Facility’s intended goals, the activities it undertakes, and how

it intends to achieve its anticipated outcomes. The LSP MDTF’s broader goal is

to “enable citizens, villages, local governments, as well as the private sector, to

implement local solutions to reduce poverty and inequality in Indonesia.” LSP’s

contributions to its broader goal are measured against three EOFOs (See Annex 1

for further details on LSP’s monitoring and evaluation [M&E] approach and detailed

ToC). LSP works to achieve its three EOFOs by leveraging the World Bank’s core

competencies through six key approaches (Figure 3).

23 The ToC is a thinking tool that is used to clarify the pathway between LSP’s goals, the activities it undertakes, and how the outcomes are expected

to be achieved.

FIGURE 3

LSP’s Broader Goal, EOFOs and Six Approaches

IMPROVEDBASIC SERVICE

DELIVERY

MORE RESPONSIVE& INCLUSIVE

LOCALGOVERNMENT

ENABLING CITIZENS, VILLAGES, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AS WELL ASTHE PRIVATE SECTOR TO IDENTIFY AND IMPLEMENT LOCAL

SOLUTIONS TO REDUCE POVERTY AND INEQUALITY IN INDONESIA

BETTER USEOF FISCAL

RESOURCES

A P P R O A C H E S

Managingmulti-sector

analysis

Fosteringpolicy-

dialogue

Facilitatingknowledgeexchange

Providingtechnical

assistance

Pilotingprojects

Institutionalizing large-scale operations

9CHAPTER THREE

In 2018, LSP supported the GoI through 10 main projects and initiatives (Table 1).

TABLE 1

LSP’s Key Programs and Activities

TITLE OBJECTIVE PARTNERS

VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT

Village Innovation Program (VIP) Improve village capacity to plan and implement

investments that focus on village entrepreneurship,

human capital formation, and village infrastructure.

MoV

Village Law Programmatic Advisory

Services and Analytics (PASA)

Support the GoI’s efforts to ensure accountable

village governance, and participatory village develop-

ment.

MoHA, MoV and MoF

BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY

ECED Frontline Pilot Increase the availability of high-quality, affordable and

professional training for ECED teachers in poor rural

districts.

MoEC

Generasi Project Empower local communities in poor, rural sub-districts

in targeted provinces to increase utilization of health

and education services.

MoV, MoEC and MoH

Investing in Nutrition and Early

Years (INEY) Operation

Increase simultaneous utilization of nutrition-related

interventions by 1,000-day households in priority

districts.24

SoVP/TNP2K, Bappenas, and

MoF, MoH

KIAT Guru Pilot Improve the presence and service quality of primary

school teachers in targeted areas by making teachers

more accountable and empowering communities to

participate in education.

TNP2K and MoEC

Managing-for-Results Project Support the GoI to track, manage, and evaluate nu-

trition-related service delivery across different levels

of government; develop a performance assessment

for district implementation of NatStrat Stunting; and

provide policy advice on the use of a Physical Special

Allocation Fund (Dana Alokasi Khusus Fisik, or DAK).

Bappenas, MoF, MoHA, and

SoVP/TNP2K

MELAYANI Pilot25 Support local governments to use a problem-driven

approach26 to tackle local service delivery issues.

MoHA and MoF

ANALYTICS

Evaluations Understand the direct impact of LSP-supported initia-

tives (KIAT Guru Pilot, Generasi and ECED Frontline

Pilot) to inform program planning and decisions, as

well as GoI policy frameworks, institutions and sys-

tems.

Bappenas, MoEC, MoV, MoHA,

BPS27 and MoEC

Special Studies Improve understanding about local development

priorities in Indonesia through conducting in-depth

research, such as the Sentinel Villages Longitudinal

Study, Civil Service Data Analysis, Rural Poverty Anal-

ysis and just-in-time (JIT) analytics.

Bappenas, MoEC, MoV, MoHA,

BPS, BKN, MoH and MoEC

24 Households with pregnant mothers and children aged zero to 24 months.25 Menguraikan Permasalahan Perbaikan Layanan Dasar di Indonesia, or Untangling Problems to Improve Basic Services in Indonesia.26 The approach draws on several different methodologies, such as problem-driven iterative adaptation (PDIA), Deliverology, and an earlier World Bank pilot instrument called the Rapid Assessment and Action Plan (the predecessor of MELAYANI)..27 Statistics Indonesia (Badan Pusat Statistik).

10

Progress Towards EOFO One: Local Government Become More Responsive and Inclusive

04

All Indonesian citizens should have an opportunity to be informed about and

have a say in village development decisions and actions. However, in practice

this is not always the case. Under the Village Law, village governments have in-

creased responsibilities in delivering health and education services, and facilitating

community participation to improve the quality of those services and overall village

development.28 However, as highlighted through LSP’s draft Sentinel Village Longi-

tudinal Study,29 a wide range of participation systems exist at the village level, which

stem from varied community awareness levels, and communities’ ability to partici-

pate and inform decisions that affect their lives.

To improve the overall quality of village development outcomes, EOFO 1 focus-

es on supporting the GoI and local governments to implement more structured,

participatory, and accountable village development processes across Indone-

sia’s 74,957 villages. It is envisaged that by improving the national and sub-national

government frameworks, systems, and capacity for participation and accountability,

it will enable more structured and effective village-level participation and ensure

ADEQUACY OF PROGRESS AGAINST OUTCOME

On Track A little off track Behind

CHAPTER FOUR

28 Article 83 (2) of the Village Law No.6/2014.29 The Sentinel Villages Longitudinal Study commenced in 2016 and examines community participation, transparency and accountability in village development processes, as well as district and sub-district sup-port for these processes. See Chapter 4.2 for further details about the study’s findings and initial influence on the GoI’s regulations.

HDW training in Ciranjang Subdistrict, Cianjur District, West Java

11

CHAPTER 4.1

Outcome 1: Strengthened local framework and systems to improve governance and downward accountability to communitiesTo improve the quality of education service delivery across rural parts of Indo-

nesia, LSP supported MoEC to establish the legal framework for KIAT Guru and

its performance incentives and accountability mechanisms (including issuing two

legally-binding regulations). Commencing in 2016, the TNP2K and MoEC KIAT Guru

Pilot aims to improve education services across remote areas in Indonesia by em-

powering communities and tying payment of Teacher Special Allowance (Tunjangan

Khusus Guru, or TKG)32 to community verification of teacher presence or evaluation

of teacher service performance. It is anticipated – based on international evidence

– that making teachers more accountable to different local education stakehold-

ers, rather than only to higher level supervisors within the education system, can

help improve education service delivery. The KIAT Guru Pilot, which has been im-

plemented in 203 remote primary schools across five underdeveloped districts,33

has shown to improve student learning outcomes, increase parental participation in

education, and reduce teacher absenteeism (see Chapter 6.3, p.47 for further details

about the KIAT Guru Pilot’s progress and impacts). The pilot is supported by LSP

and implemented by Yayasan Bursa Pengetahuan Kawasan Timur Indonesia (BaKTI).

PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO ONE

local governments’ development plans

and budgets better reflect community

needs (including for women, the poor

and other marginalized groups). During

2018, LSP supported this EOFO through

multiple projects including the KIAT

Guru Pilot, the Village Law PASA, Gen-

erasi Project (including the HDW Pilot),

and VIP.

Overall progress towards EOFO 1 is

‘on track’. In 2018, LSP achieved mul-

tiple notable milestones (see Figure 4)

and, according to the LSP Activity Track-

er, 98 percent of activities under EOFO

1 were either completed or are on track

to be completed as scheduled, with two

percent of activities either delayed or

dropped/realigned.30 Delays were pre-

dominately related to VIP. While VIP ex-

perienced some operational challeng-

es during the first half of 2018, LSP was

able to provide additional technical and

monitoring support to minimize overall

program implementation delays.31

MORE RESPONSIVE & INCLUSIVE LOCAL GOVERNMENT

• MoEC, with LSP support, established the legal framework (issued two le-

gally-binding regulations) for KIAT Guru and its performance incentives and

accountability mechanism.

• LSP’s Sentinel Village Longitudinal Study generated knowledge about Vil-

lage Law planning, transparency & accountability practices and is being

used to inform regulations and processes that improve village-level devel-

opment and participation (including via the proposed Village Operation).

• LSP supported the GoI institutionalize Generasi citizen engagement tools

into regular Village Law processes (via the INEY PforR and HDW Pilot), to

support the GoI’s nationwide stunting prevention efforts.

• Village governments, with LSP support (via Generasi’s HDW Pilot, the INEY

PforR and VIP Operation), increasingly prioritized locally needed basic

health and education services.

• LSP supported the GoI adopt a peer-to-peer learning approach to support

over 71,000 Indonesian villages generate learning and innovations to ad-

dress local service delivery challenges.

30 During the reporting period (January to Decem-ber 2018), 49 activities were tracked under EOFO 1 in the LSP Activity Tracker. 31 Over the first half of 2018, MoV experienced var-ious annual work planning, budgeting, and project management issues, which slowed project imple-mentation from February to August 2018. To min-imize program implementation disruptions, LSP provided increased capacity and technical support. For example, LSP supported MoV to establish a monitoring system to identify, track and resolve bottlenecks; prepare key operational documents (guidelines, training modules and tools for innova-tion replication); and better integrate the current facilitation structure with VIP. LSP also supported MoV’s request to extend the operation from De-cember 2018 to December 2019 to ensure that all objectives, key performance indicators, and activi-ties can be achieved as originally planned.32 Teachers working in special areas (including re-mote areas) receive TKG, which can equate to up to one times a teacher’s base salary.33 The pilot districts in Sintang, Ketapang and Lan-dak in Kalimantan Barat Province; and Manggarai Barat and Manggarai Timur in Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT) Province.

FIGURE 4

LSP’s Major EOFO 1 Milestones during January to December 2018

12 CHAPTER FOUR

During the reporting period, LSP pro-

vided technical and analytical support

to MoEC to draft two regulations which

provide the legal grounding for the pi-

lot’s ongoing implementation (see Box

2). As a result of these national regu-

lations, seven Memorandum of Under-

standing (MoUs) between MoEC, TN-

P2K, and the five pilot districts — and

a subsequent 429 sub-national regula-

tions and decrees (37 at the district lev-

el and 392 at the village level) — were

issued over 2018.34 These regulations

and decrees empowered communities

to evaluate teachers’ performances and

affect the value of teachers’ TKG in pilot

schools. In addition, LSP also provid-

ed technical assistance and inputs to

MoEC to adapt KIAT Guru mechanisms

for an urban setting and to eventually

make Teacher Professional Allowance

(Tunjangan Profesi Guru, or TPG) per-

formance-based (see Box 2).35

Beyond strengthening the national

framework, LSP also worked to strength-

en MoEC and district government un-

derstanding, ownership, and ability to

implement KIAT Guru’s governance and

accountability mechanisms. As per No-

vember 2018, 995 MoEC and district

government officials (87 percent male

and 13 percent female) had participated

in KIAT Guru capacity-building sessions.

These sessions focused on developing

work plans, allocating funding and re-

sources, drafting decrees to support

implementation, and administering TKG

payments based on community evalua-

tions of teacher performance.36

To help the GoI measure village development performance and improve down-

ward accountability mechanisms at the district and village level, LSP, as part of

its ongoing analytical work, is also supporting Bappenas to harmonize the GoI’s

current village indices for measuring village progress. The GoI currently uses two

different village indices — Bappenas’ Indeks Pembangunan Desa (IPD) and MoV’s

Indeks Desa Membangun (IDM) — that do not always reflect key villages’ progress

and achievements, including the poverty rate. LSP is providing technical assistance

to Bappenas to harmonize the two indices and to improve the instrument for col-

lecting data to inform the harmonized indices. In 2018, LSP held a series of consul-

tations with Bappenas and undertook early data analysis to compare the quality of

each index. During the first half of 2019, LSP, together with the Central Bureau of

Statistics (Badan Pusat Statistik, or BPS), will field test a consolidated instrument

(in April 2019) and finalize the instrument’s design. During 2019, LSP will also assist

Bappenas to analyze the collected data, establish a mechanism to feed the data

back to villages, and test how villages can use this data to inform their own planning

processes. However, further work remains to build consensus between key minis-

tries on what should be included in a single index to measure village performance.

During 2019, LSP will continue to engage with relevant counterparts on developing

a harmonized village index to improve village performance monitoring.

34 See Annex 3: Activity Tracker - KIAT Guru (p. 77) for a further breakdown of the various regulations, which were issued relating to KIAT Guru in 2018.35 MoEC requested to scale out the perfor-mance-based TKG to additional 183 schools in the same five districts and test the mechanisms for performance-based TPG and secondary education level in urban areas in 40 schools. Towards the end of 2018, the World Bank Task Team prepared a pro-posal for KIAT Guru Phase 2. See Chapter 6.3 for further details. 36 This number exceeds the original target of 375 staff and adjusted target of 750 staff. In November 2018, as part of the project restructuring, this target was increased (from 350 to 750 staff) in response to a request from the GoI to continue providing technical assistance to help sustain the pilot.

BOX 2.

Influencing Policy Change – the KIAT Guru Pilot The KIAT Guru Pilot tests policy options to improve teacher presence and ser-

vice performance using two mechanisms: (1) community empowerment mech-

anism; and (2) pay-for-performance of TKG based on either teacher presence

(verified by community representatives) or teacher service performance (eval-

uated by community representatives). The community representatives are for-

mally organized through User Committees, whose members are elected and

acknowledged by a Village Decree and have an explicit role in monitoring

and evaluating teachers’ service performance.

In April 2018, MoEC, with LSP support, issued two regulations:

• The Ministerial Decree No 95/P/2018 on National Priority Program in De-

livery of Tunjangan Khusus Guru (TKG) and Tunjangan Profesi Guru (TPG),

which identified KIAT Guru as MoEC’s national priority program; and

• Secretary-General Regulation No 11/2018, which provided technical guide-

lines for the KIAT Guru project implementation using TKG in 2018.

Specifically, LSP supported technical specialists to conduct policy reviews

and analysis, and to lead discussions with MoEC and district government

counterparts to identify regulatory gaps and develop mechanisms to make

TKG performance-based. The regulations are significant as they provide the

necessary legal grounding to empower communities to evaluate teachers’

service performance and affect the value of teachers’ TKG in pilot schools.

Once issued, the national regulations provide a policy hook for districts to

issue a District Head Regulation (Peraturan Bupati, or Perbup) for the KIAT

Guru Pilot implementation. The Perbup then provides a policy hook for Village

Heads to issue decrees on the KIAT Guru User Committees, which legitimize

their roles to verify teacher presence and evaluate teacher performance.

Overall the regulations enable the continued conditional payment of TKG

based on teacher’s attendance or service performance, and empowerment

of community representatives to hold teachers accountable in 2018.

13PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO ONE

CHAPTER 4.2

Outcome 2: Communities have more effective and structured participation at the village-level

During 2018, LSP provided analytical,

advisory, and implementation support

at both the national and sub-national

level to ensure more structured and

effective village-level participation.

LSP supported multiple studies to gen-

erate knowledge about Village Law im-

plementation practices and barriers to

inclusion (Sentinel Villages Longitudinal

Study and the Stocktaking Review on

Inclusion), generated knowledge and

assistance to make Village Law related

regulations more participatory and to

improve village development outcomes,

and supported the GoI to institutional-

ize Generasi citizen engagement tools

within Village Law processes to maxi-

mize community participation in village

decision-making (particularly related to

basic service delivery, including stunt-

ing).

LSP’s draft Sentinel Villages Longi-

tudinal Study — which generated

important knowledge about Village

Law planning, transparency and ac-

countability practices — is being used

by the GoI to inform regulations and

processes that improve village-level

development and participation (e.g.,

MoV’s Dana Desa Priority Use for 2019,

Kemenko PMK’s Cash-for-Work and the

new proposed Village Operation). Com-

mencing in 2016, the two-year Sentinel

Villages Study examines community

participation, transparency, and ac-

countability in village development pro-

cesses, as well as district and sub-dis-

trict support for these processes.37

The study is significant as it is currently

the only systematic, rigorous, long-term

quantitative and qualitative study of ac-

tual Village Law implementation on the

ground, and thus provides a key source

of evidence for policy makers, officials,

and other actors. In May 2018, LSP,

in collaboration with the SMERU Re-

search Institute, completed the endline

quantitative survey in 112 villages, 28

sub-districts, and five districts, as well

as the qualitative study in 10 villages.38

During the reporting period, LSP and

SMERU also published and presented

two thematic studies on: (1) supra-village

governments; and (2) planning and bud-

geting processes.39 Overall, some pre-

liminary results from this work include

the following:

• Participatory planning alone is not

enough to empower villages and

communities to deliver local devel-

opment. Instead, a combination of

both participatory and technocratic

planning (i.e., data-driven planning) is

needed;

• There is a strong need for a differenti-

ated approach to building village-lev-

el capacity (both government and

communities), which takes varying ca-

pacity levels into account. The GoI’s

current one-size-fits all system needs

to be more demand-based to cov-

er varying needs across Indonesia’s

nearly 75,000 villages;

• There is a need to revive structured

participation forums (from hamlet lev-

el up) and organic facilitators (such as

cadres living in the village and other

local actors) to strengthen communi-

ties’ standing and active participation

37 The longitudinal study monitors village gover-nance in five selected districts. The study involved two rounds of surveys (baseline and endline) in 112 villages and qualitative studies in 10 villages. As part of the study, a field observer stayed in each district to provide updates on the challenges to implementing the Village Law. See https://localso-lutionstopoverty.org/study/sentinel-villages-study.html for further details.38 For the quantitative survey, survey respondents included village and hamlet heads, Village Coun-cils (Badan Permusyawaratan Desa, or BPD), vil-lage activists, local health and education actors, and members of households (one male and one female per household). 39 For further details see: https://localsolution-stopoverty.org/news/roles-supra-village-gov-ernment-village-law-implementation.html and https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/news/plan-ning-and-budgeting-process-village.html.People in a village where Sentinel Village Study takes place work together repairing road.

14 CHAPTER FOUR

within village development processes; and

• Communities need more structure and support if they are to hold village gov-

ernments to account. Existing village councils (Badan Permusyawaratan Desa,

or BPD) also still need capacity strengthening support. In addition, forums such

as accountability meetings need to be reinstated to give communities space to

engage directly with village government.

LSP is currently finalizing the Sentinel Villages data analysis and formulating con-

crete recommendations and actions to help empower communities to participate

and influence village development. The study’s findings are expected to be final-

ized by June 2019 and will be presented in a final report and through a workshop

with counterparts, partners, and other development programs. The study will also

be publicized online (including via the LSP website and the World Bank portal) to

encourage greater knowledge sharing and uptake of recommendations among In-

donesian and other relevant stakeholders working in this space.

In the interim, to ensure uptake of knowledge generated through the Sentinel

Villages Study, LSP continues to engage with key counterparts to identify knowl-

edge gaps and provide targeted evidence to inform specific policies and pro-

grams that improve village development outcomes. While the study is expected to

be finalized in June 2019, LSP continues to engage with key GoI counterparts about

important emerging results and findings through a series of BBLs and discussions.

For example, in November 2018, LSP presented the Sentinel Village analyses relat-

ed to the GoI Cash-for-Work initiatives’ implementation and challenges to Kemenko

PMK. The presentation and findings were well received by Kemenko PMK and pro-

vided the ministry with evidence to adjust the Cash-for-Work initiative’s implemen-

tation — including in relation to the current 30 percent labor cap, the beneficiary

selection process, and providing villages with more authority. In other cases, LSP

engaged with ministerial counterparts to advocate emerging recommendations,

which were generated through the Sentinel Villages Study and were particularly

pertinent to the GoI’s various agendas. For example, through the draft study, LSP

identified a need for greater emphasis on poverty reduction, improving human de-

velopment and local economic growth at the village level. Consequently, LSP ad-

vocated and provided technical inputs to MoV’s new Regulation (Peraturan Menteri

Desa, or Permendesa) on Priority Use of Villages Funds in 2019, which now incor-

porates a greater focus on these key elements. Beyond this, the Sentinel Villages

Study’s draft findings are also providing a key source of evidence to shape the GoI’s

newly proposed Village Operation (Box 3 on p. 15), which aims to improve villages’

core functions and development outcomes. Based on the early findings, the new

proposed operation will include various interventions aimed at improving the quality

of community engagement and inputs in village meetings (musyawarah desa, or

Musdes). For example, this will involve improving manuals and training materials for

village government and facilitators to revitalize hamlet meetings to gather inputs

from community members who cannot attend Musdes, and to encourage women

and the poor to attend and actively participate in meetings.

Building on the Sentinel Villages Study (which highlighted women and other

vulnerable groups’ varied levels of inclusion in village development), in 2018

the Village Law PASA also launched the Stocktaking Review on Inclusion to

improve understanding about the factors hindering or promoting village-level

participation and inclusion. The stocktaking review systematically assesses the

way the Village Law regulatory framework, training of village officials, accountabil-

ity of district and village officials, and other development programs (e.g., MAMPU,

KOMPAK, and Peduli) hinder or promote inclusion.40 The review also identifies chal-

lenges, best practices, and specific improvements that would support more inclu-

The Sentinel Villages’ Quantitative Endline Survey being undertaken, using a tablet, in Banyumas Dis-trict, East Java.

sive village planning, budgeting, and

implementation. As part of the Stock-

taking Review on Inclusion, in 2018,

LSP conducted a desktop analysis;41

held focus group discussions (FDGs)

with development programs that sup-

port inclusion in rural Indonesia (e.g.,

PEKKA’s Paradigta);42 and undertook

field work in two districts where the

Paradigta program is active.43 Initial find-

ings from the draft study indicate that

several factors can hamper participa-

tion among the poor, including potential

exclusion by village governments (i.e.,

not all villagers are invited to village

development forums), limited capacity,

high opportunity costs, and a tendency

to prefer engaging in informal negotia-

tions rather than in formal deliberative

40 Specifically, the review assessed the level of inclusion of vulnerable groups during: (i) planning and budgeting; (ii) implementation of investments and services; and (iii) reporting, monitoring, and oversight.41 The desktop analysis included a review of ex-isting studies and documents, current legal and regulatory frameworks, and training curricula and modules for village capacity building.42 PEKKA’s Paradigta Akademi is a program that is designed to support women leaders (through reflection, development, and education) to create transformative change at various levels, starting from the village. For example, the program aims to develop the leadership potential of women in villages so they can be more actively involved and participate in community empowerment and devel-opment processes in their local areas.43 The fieldwork was undertaken in Kubu Raya District, West Kalimantan (in September 2018) and Brebes District, Central Java in October 2018.

15PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO ONE

forums. Furthermore, the review highlighted that women who

participated in targeted capacity building programs (such as

the Paradigta Akademi program) often felt more empowered

to participate in village meetings. The review recommended

two key policy actions to maximize and sustain marginalized

villagers’ participation in Village Law implementation:

• Preserve the contestability of the policy arena at the village

level by ensuring that participation in village meetings is

open to all; and

• Re-empower village-level civil society groups to help estab-

lish a competitive policy arena at the village level. Grass-

roots capacity building programs, like Paradigta Akademi,

can help strengthen the capacity of non-governing elites to

act as a countervailing power.

In November 2018, LSP shared the review’s initial findings at

a USAID-organized Civil Society Organization (CSO) Forum,

which was attended by over 200 participants from various lo-

cal and national CSOs, the GoI, and international development

partners. The key findings were well received by CSOs, partic-

ularly concerning the need to build villagers’ political capacity

to act as a countervailing force in villages. To date, the re-

view’s draft results have informed dialogue with the GoI about

the new proposed Village Operation’s design. For example,

based on the review’s draft findings the operation includes in-

terventions to improve information flows to villages to improve

their understanding of village government processes, and to

build the capacity of communities (including women) to more

actively participate in governance processes. LSP will finalize

the report and share with relevant stakeholders in September

2019.

Over 2017 and 2018, MoHA and MoV used LSP-generated

evidence and assistance to strengthen Village Law related

regulations so they are more inclusive of community and

customary groups and incorporate perspectives from a wid-

er group of stakeholders. On 9 April 2018, the GoI issued

Permendagri No. 18/2018 on Village Community Institutions

(Lembaga Kemasyarakatan Desa, or LKD) and Village Cus-

tomary Institutions (Lembaga Adat Desa, or LAD), which pro-

vides the legal grounds for village community and customary

groups to participate in village development. Permendagri

No. 18/2018 was informed by LSP’s analytical and technical

assistance to MoHA during 2017. In supporting the regulatory

drafting of the Permendagri, LSP applied an evidence-based

policy making approach, which required participation from

local communities and local governments. LSP organized

and facilitated various engagement activities with a range of

stakeholders between June and October 2017.44 As a result

of this assistance, the Permendagri No. 18/2018 provides an

enabling approach towards more inclusive village develop-

BOX 3.

Proposed New Village Operation In 2018, the World Bank and MoHA launched prepara-

tions for the new proposed World Bank Operation —

Institutional Strengthening for Improved Village Service

Delivery (or the Village Operation). The new proposed

operation aims to improve the impact of the GoI’s large

(Rp 100 trillion per year) investment in villages, under

the Village Law No. 6/2014, by improving the quality of

village spending and service delivery.

Drawing heavily on the Village Law PASA and other LSP

technical assistance and analyses, the proposed oper-

ation will focus on strengthening village governments’

capacity, accountability and core functions (planning,

budgeting, implementing, and monitoring village-level

development projects) to improve overall village de-

velopment outcomes. Based on continued dialogue

with the GoI, as well as additional diagnostic work and

assessments, the operation will include an increasing

emphasis on targeting villages (rather than districts),

utilizing technology, and promoting innovation systems

to improve village development outcomes. It also aims

to support the development and scaling of digital plat-

forms and information systems to better capture, store

and use information related to village development. The

proposed operation will focus on four main components:

1. Strengthening village government institutions;

2. Promoting participatory village development;

3. Strengthening village government performance; and

4. Strengthening national coordination, monitoring and

supervision.

In 2019, LSP will continue to work with the MoHA, MoV,

Bappenas, Menko PMK, and other relevant ministries

to finalize the design and preparations for the opera-

tion. It is expected that MoHA will be the primary exe-

cuting agency for the Village Operation.

Economic activity in Lombok Tengah District44 Including two workshops, two focus group discussions (FGDs) and five meet-ings in Jakarta, three field visits to Papua, Central Kalimantan and West Sulawe-si, and one public consultation in Yogyakarta.

16

ment. By using a participatory method

to draft the regulation, it improved the

regulatory development process and

also brought about some unexpected

outcomes of improved capacity among

relevant government counterparts. In

2018, LSP also provided technical as-

sistance to MoV to inform its Regulation

(Permendesa) on Village Development

Guidelines (Pedoman Pembangunan

Desa), which combines three previously

separate regulations concerning village

development, facilitation and communi-

ty empowerment. Specifically, LSP sup-

ported MoV to conduct consultations

and workshops, gather information,

and provide inputs into the draft Per-

mendesa. Such assistance may have

informed the new Permendesa, which is

currently being internally reviewed and

finalized by MoV. The revised regulation

is significant as it provides a regulatory

framework for local governments to leg-

islate more participatory and inclusive

local government processes. Once im-

plemented, it is expected that the reg-

ulation will provide villages with more

explicit guidance on how to manage vil-

lage development from planning, bud-

geting, organizing, and implementing,

to monitoring and evaluation (M&E).

Meanwhile, at the village level, LSP

supported MoV’s “Healthy and Bright

Generasi” (Generasi) Project to in-

crease participation in village deci-

sion-making (particularly related to

health and education). From 2007 to

2018, LSP supported MoV’s Generasi

Project, which empowered local com-

munities (community members, cadres,

frontline workers, organizations, and

Posyandu) to increase community uti-

lization of basic health and education

services. The project empowered and

maximized communities’ participation in

decision-making by, among other things,

employing various citizen engagement

CHAPTER FOUR

45 In 2007, 530,534 women participated in village level basic service delivery planning.46 Over a four-year period, participation of the poor fluctuated between 42 and 52 percent, which is slightly below the target of 60 percent. This indicator covers the participation of the poor in kecamatan-, village- and hamlet-level meetings. This indicator has likely declined because of lower levels of participation among the poor in village-level meetings. This is likely due to Generasi’s integration with regular village planning. Prior to the Generasi-Village Law Integration, Generasi exclusively targeted poor households and women. However, the mechanism for implementing village meetings in the context of the Village Law is usually more formal and involves invitations that do not necessarily specifically target poor households. Despite this, poor households continue to participate in hamlet-level meetings in the context of the Village Law.

FIGURE 5

Women, Men and the Poor Household’s Participation

under Generasi

W O M E N P A R T I C I P A T E D

I N L O C A L V I L L A G E - L E V E L

B A S I C S E R V I C E

D E L I V E R Y P L A N N I N G

923,000

M E N P A R T I C I P A T E D

I N P R E G N A N C Y &

N U T R I T I O N S E S S I O N S

33%

P O O R H O U S E H O L D S

W E R E I N V O L V E D I N

L O C A L - L E V E L C O M M U N I T Y

M E E T I N G S

663,241

tools, such as social mapping, commu-

nity scorecards, and social monitoring.

Generasi also used various mechanisms

to maximize women’s participation in de-

cision-making (such as targeted capac-

ity building, dedicated meetings, FGDs,

and quotas), along with men’s participa-

tion in community pregnancy and nutri-

tion sessions. Results from Generasi’s

efforts show that between January and

December 2018 over 923,000 women

— from 5,789 villages, across 11 provinc-

es — participated in village-level basic

service delivery planning.45 The efforts

also led to increased men’s participa-

tion in pregnancy and nutrition sessions

from 10 percent in 2013 (i.e., 10 percent

men versus 90 percent women) to 33

percent (i.e., 33 percent men versus 67

percent women) in 2018. During 2018,

Generasi also continued to help mobi-

lize poor households to participate in

community basic service delivery meet-

ings and decision-making. From Jan-

uary to December 2018, 663,241 poor

households — from 5,789 villages in 11

Generasi provinces — were involved in

community village meetings.46 These

positive results are echoed by the

qualitative Generasi Long-Term Impact

Evaluation, which found that the project

effectively used simple citizen engage-

ment and social accountability tools to

mobilize villages to focus on key ba-

sic services and help revitalize the vil-

lage-level Posyandu. It also found that

active and meaningful participation was

particularly evident at the hamlet level,

where it had a more direct impact on

decision-making and the point at which

many basic early childhood, health and

education services (such as Posyandu

and PAUD) are delivered to beneficia-

ries.

Given the Generasi Project (and LSP’s

support for it) concluded in December

2018, during the reporting period, the

Facility also focused on capturing, inte-

grating, and sustaining Generasi activ-

ities into regular village development

processes. For example, LSP supported

the GoI to incorporate Generasi citizen

engagement and empowerment tools

to strengthen the GoI’s national stunt-

ing prevention efforts (e.g., via the HDW

Pilot and INEY PforR Operation– see

below and Box 4). LSP also supported

the GoI to incorporate lessons and ap-

17PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO ONE

BOX 4.

The GoI’s HDW Pilot – Empowering Local Actors to Drive Village-Level Stunting PreventionIn 2018, LSP continued to support the GoI’s HDW Pilot, which aims to improve

human capital and prevent stunting in the country’s 31 districts (3,105 villages)

with the highest stunting prevalence. The HDW Pilot, which ran from January

to December 2018, employs an innovative community-based HDW model and

acts as a central implementation mechanism of the NatStrat Stunting.

The pilot mobilizes HDWs at the village level to empower local actors to

improve the delivery, monitoring, and utilization of nutrition-related interven-

tions. As part of their role, HDWs work with village-level actors to:

1. Raise awareness: Introducing stunting length mats to raise awareness

about stunting and to support village health posts’ (Posyandu) to transition

growth promotion activities from weight to height monitoring;

2. Map priority households and services: Undertaking social mapping of

1,000-day households and their access to priority nutrition interventions;

3. Secure commitments: Organizing annual village-level Stunting Summits to

secure village leaders’ commitment to stunting reduction;

4. Monitor interventions: Submitting monthly consolidated data on priority

nutrition interventions (from Village Convergence Scorecards); and

5. Report progress: Organizing quarterly Village Convergence Forums with

village leaders to report progress to community members.

proaches from the Generasi-Village Law

Integration to increase village prioritiza-

tion (planning and budgeting) of health

and education services (see Chapter

4.3 on p. 20 for further details).47 Finally,

over 2018, LSP supported MoV to sys-

tematically capture and share Genera-

si’s best practices and lessons learned.

For example, LSP is preparing the Gen-

erasi Implementation Completion Re-

port (ICR), which documents Generasi’s

progress against its intended objectives

and targets. LSP is also developing a

complementary “narrative” report to

consolidate and highlight the program’s

lessons and progress. Both reports will

be finalized in mid-2019.

Since 2017 LSP has supported MoV

to institutionalize Generasi citizen en-

gagement tools into regular Village

Law processes to support the GoI’s

stunting prevention efforts (including

via the INEY PforR Operation and MoF

Regulation on Village Fund Manage-

ment). The GoI’s NatStrat Stunting (Box

6) has a strong focus on citizen engage-

ment and community empowerment

and LSP has helped provide the GoI

with a strategy, tools, and incentives to

implement these principles in practice

(via the INEY PforR Operation). Specif-

ically, the INEY Operation incentivizes

the use of four tools to engage citizens

in accelerating stunting prevention, in-

cluding: (1) stunting length mats; (2) so-

cial mapping and stunting diagnostics;

(3) village convergence scorecards;

and (4) public dissemination and use of

data at multiple levels. Together, these

tools aim to empower villages and com-

munities to converge and hold govern-

ments accountable for the delivery of

village-level nutrition-related interven-

tions. During 2018, as part of the Nat-

Strat Stunting, the GoI institutionalized a

version of Generasi’s community perfor-

mance scorecard within the MoF Reg-

ulation on Village Fund Management

(PMK No. 193/PMK.07/2018 tentang

Pengelolaan Dana Desa) and Annual

Dana Desa Report. This enhanced Dana Desa Report will help encourage villages

to spend more on stunting and to improve convergence of nutrition interventions for

priority households. In 2018, LSP also supported the GoI, as part of the HDW Pilot

(Box 4), to test the stunting length mats, social mapping, and public dissemination of

data at the village level.

Demand for the HDW citizen engagement and empowerment tools at the lo-

cal level is strong. Early results from the pilot suggest that these innovative tools,

particularly the stunting length mats, have generated significant interest among

community-level stakeholders (village cadres, community members, and 1,000-day

household beneficiaries) and were effective in raising awareness and obtaining vil-

lage-level support for stunting prevention efforts. Midwives and Puskesmas staff

also reported using the length mat measurement results to strengthen their own

HDW in Lombok explains about stunting to the mothers on Posyandu Day

47 See Annex 3: Activity Tracker – Generasi on p. 71-75 for a full summary of the specific activities undertaken during the reporting period.

18

monitoring on stunting. Further, village demand for the length mats is strong in both

priority and non-priority stunting villages. However, limited resources have hindered

the distribution of mat packages.48 Given this demand and the limited availability

of mat packages, some villages have developed their own length mats (e.g., using

rope to measure height). While this high demand is promising, it presents quality

control issues and may influence the accuracy of measurement results.

Over 2018, LSP also captured various lessons learned and provided recommen-

dations to strengthen MoV’s HDW scaling efforts, including the implementation

of the citizen engagement tools during 2019 and beyond. In 2019, the GoI (MoV

and MoF) will scale the HDW Pilot to 160 districts, as part of NatStrat Stunting, and

plans to expand to 390 districts in 2020 and 514 districts in 2021. To inform the

GoI’s scaling efforts, in December 2018 LSP provided multiple recommendations

to strengthen future HDW implementation. For example, in relation to the citizen

engagement tools, LSP recommended that MoV create an authorizing environment

for village governments to fund the tools using Dana Desa (e.g., by incorporating

a greater focus on stunting in MoV’s annual Permendesa on Priority Use of Village

Funds), and also to further adjust and simplify the Village Convergence Scorecard

to avert data inputting errors.49 Box 5 provides a summary of LSP’s other recom-

mended actions.

CHAPTER FOUR

The growth mat is very useful for

midwives… after we use the growth mat

to monitor and identify [infants’

height], the resultscan be more precise

because on the growth mat there is a measurement according to age...

Thank God it is very useful.

Midwife

BOX 5.

LSP is Informing MoV’s Scaling of the HDW Pilot in 2019 and BeyondBased on the pilot’s initial lessons and experiences, in December 2018 LSP recom-mended multiple actions to MoV to help inform and strengthen the GoI’s future HDW scaling and implementation, including:

• Create an enabling environment and support village governments to fund length mat packages using Dana Desa;

• Accelerate the early execution of MoV’s Capacity-Building Grant (DOK) in 2019, and identify a potential alternative strategy to finance HDW activities (training and incentives) that doesn’t rely solely on central government systems;

• Implement on-the-job-training (OJT) for HDWs and develop complementary HDW e-learning modules, which can be easily accessed by facilitators and HDWs across the country. The current training modules should also be updated to align with MoV’s revised HDW terms of reference (ToR), NatStrat Stunting, and National and Village Convergence Actions Guidelines;

• Provide training for Village Facilitators (Pendamping Desa) on stunting; and• Simplify HDW’s administrative processes (such as data inputting), which can be

time consuming and burdensome.

To date, the GoI has addressed some of these recommendations and incorporated them in various mechanisms, such as Bappenas’ Convergence Guidelines on Stunt-ing Prevention (Pedoman Pelaksanaan Intervensi Penurunan Stunting Terintegrasi di Kabupaten/Kota), MoV’s Convergence Guidelines on Stunting Prevention in Vil-lage (Panduan Konvergensi Pencegahan Stunting di Desa), MoV’s General Guid-ance on HDW (Pedoman Umum HDW), and MoV’s village facilitator (Pendamping Desa) and HDW training modules.

In 2019, LSP will focus on helping the GoI take some of the other actions forward, including identifying ways to simplify and streamline HDWs’ administrative and data inputting processes using technology-based solutions. Specifically, LSP will help MoV and MoF develop and test the HDW App (e-HDW) which aims to simplify HDWs’ tracking of household and villages’ progress towards key stunting convergence in-dicators. It is anticipated that LSP will support the application’s design, field testing, and refinement in 2019.

48 Ideally the GoI should distribute one length mat package per Posyandu, Puskesmas, and district health office (DHO) at the district level. However, given limited funds and resources the GoI has only distributed one length mat package per village in selected priority districts and villages. To help respond to increased demand, in December 2018 LSP recommended that the GoI prioritize working with sub-national governments to create an autho-rizing environment for village governments to fund length mats (and other HDW activities) through regular village planning processes (i.e., using Dana Desa).49 For example, some recommended adjustments include simplifying the convergence data form, consolidating the growth monitoring indicators, improving the description and processes for re-cording growth monitoring scores, and developing a dedicated training module for HDWs to increase their knowledge and understanding of scorecard procedures.

19PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO ONE

This [length mat] tool is very simple, easy to use and the measurements are clear… there is no obstacle in using it.

Village Head, Cianjur District

BOX 6.

Finalizing the NatStrat Stunting and INEY PforR Operation to Improve the Quality of Nearly US$ 4 Billion in Annual GoI Spending to Tackle Stunting

The NatStrat Stunting

Despite the GoI’s significant spending on stunting-related

interventions, Indonesia, has the fifth highest percentage

of stunted children in the world with 31 percent of children

under the age of five being stunted. To tackle the country’s

stubbornly high stunting rate, in August 2017 the Vice Pres-

ident of Indonesia announced the GoI’s ambitious national

strategy to accelerate stunting prevention (NatStrat Stunting

2018-2024). The NatStrat Stunting calls for stronger collab-

oration among multiple stakeholders — government, civil

society, the private sector, and academics — at national and

regional levels to tackle stunting. For example, it commits

22 ministries to better coordinate and converge the GoI’s

nutrition-related interventions across five sectors (health,

WASH, ECED, social protection, and food security) for 1,000-

day households in all 74,957 villages, or for about 48 million

beneficiaries. The strategy also has a strong focus on citizen

engagement, community empowerment, and bottom-up

accountability to accelerate village-level convergence and

stunting prevention.

In 2017, LSP leveraged its access to international exper-

tise and global knowledge, and its extensive experience

with implementing multi-sector programs (such as PNPM,

Generasi, and the ECED Frontline Pilot) to help inform the

GoI’s NatStrat Stunting. Building on this work, in 2018 LSP

supported SoVP, TNP2K and Bappenas to finalize the Nat-

Strat Stunting, along with incentives to strengthen its imple-

mentation and performance. To finalize the strategy, LSP

worked closely with MAHKOTA-TNP2K to provide tech-

nical assistance and inputs to the GoI. LSP also helped

coordinate and assist the 10 participating GoI ministries

(SoVP, MoF, MoHA, MoH, MoEC, MoSA, BPS, Bappenas,

MoV, and Kemenko PMK) to assess options to maximize

results, set agreed targets, and prioritize technical sup-

port. For example, LSP supported a design workshop

with the 10 ministries in September 2018. The NatStrat

Stunting was launched in November 2018 at the ‘National

Coordination Meeting to Encourage Convergence/Inte-

gration of Stunted Children Prevention Acceleration’.

Given that the GoI’s formal Coordination Mechanism is

not yet fully in place, working across and coordinating

10 ministries posed various challenges. However, to min-

imize delays, LSP continued to support various GoI ini-

tiatives aimed at strengthening coordination, including

the GoI’s Bootcamp Stunting, which brought together all

implementing ministries and district governments.

The INEY PforR Operation

Given the World Bank’s extensive programmatic and op-

erational experience, the GoI requested World Bank sup-

port to operationalize and incentivize the NatStrat Stunt-

ing through the INEY PforR Operation. In May 2018, the

GoI and the World Bank finalized the ambitious US$400

million INEY PforR Operation to improve the efficien-

cy and impact of the GoI’s NatStrat Stunting and over

HDW and children walk pass ricefields in their village.

20 CHAPTER FOUR

US$3.5 billion (Rp 51.9 trillion) in annual GoI spending on

nutrition-related interventions. The operation was officially

finalized at a ministerial meeting, which was chaired by In-

donesian Vice President Jusuf Kalla, in May 2018.

The INEY PforR focuses on increasing simultaneous utili-

zation of nutrition-related interventions at the national and

sub-national level. It also provides incentives and tools (in-

cluding citizen engagement and bottom-up accountability

approaches) to improve the efficiency and impact of the

NatStrat Stunting. The INEY Operation includes four results

areas:

1. Strengthened national leadership; 2. Strengthened convergence of district activities; 3. Strengthened delivery of sector programs; and 4. Converged village service delivery.

BOX 6. CONTINUED

CHAPTER 4.3

Outcome 3: Local governments have development plans and budgets that better reflect community needs, including women and poor people

After four years of Village Law imple-

mentation, there is an increasing focus

on ensuring that villages’ development

plans and budgets are driven from the

bottom-up and reflect local community

needs. To improve the inclusion of local

perspectives and needs in village plan-

ning and budgeting, LSP — through the

Generasi Project, the HDW Pilot, VIP Op-

eration, and the new proposed Village

Operation — is supporting district and

village governments to identify, plan and

budget for locally-needed basic services

and solutions.

At the village level, LSP supported and

incentivized village governments to

prioritize locally needed basic health

and education services via Generasi

(including the HDW Pilot) and the INEY

PforR Operation. Findings from the 2017

LSP-supported ViPER analyses high-

lighted that, on average, villages tend to

spend about five percent of their funds

on health and education.50 During 2018,

This training is very useful, but the most difficult part is to

analyze data that needs more detailed attention.

I will share what I learn with the village head, village cadres

and all relevant actors who work on stunting

prevention in my village.

HDW from East Lombok District

LSP continued to support the Generasi

Integration Strategy, which reoriented

the program’s facilitation support to-

wards assisting village governments

and communities to ensure that villag-

es better address health and education

needs (including stunting) in regular vil-

lage planning and budgeting process-

es. Commencing in 2016, the Generasi

Integration Strategy is now rolled out

in all 66 Generasi locations. As part

of LSP’s support for the Generasi inte-

gration, the Facility provided technical,

operational and monitoring assistance

to MoV to train Generasi Facilitators

so that they can better support district,

sub-district and village governments to

50 In 2017, LSP’s ViPER analyzed 1,868 village bud-gets (from FY 2016) to determine how villages tend to utilize and spend their increased funds. The analysis provided the GoI with the most in-depth review currently available on how Indonesian vil-lages spend their increased funds. The ViPER re-sults were presented to MoF, MoHA, MoV, TNP2K, internally within the Bank, and with other develop-ment partners (e.g., KOMPAK) in 2017.

Over 2018, LSP supported the GoI’s early implementation

of the NatStrat Stunting, including via the INEY Operation,

along with Generasi (HDW Pilot), the Managing-for-Results

Project, and the ECED Frontline Pilot. In 2019, LSP will con-

tinue to support the GoI set up the implementation and

coordination arrangements for INEY. LSP will also support

several process evaluations to inform various ongoing,

planned, and proposed INEY activities. The process eval-

uations will focus on district planning and budgeting, DAK

health, district data quality, adolescent girls, and an urban

assessment.

21PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO ONE

prioritize and maximize Dana Desa allocations for basic services — particularly pri-

ority stunting interventions in line with the GoI’s NatStrat Stunting. Specifically, LSP

provided technical assistance to MoV to enhance the design of the facilitator train-

ing modules by incorporating a greater focus on stunting. LSP also supported MoV

to deliver the training modules and supervise training for 48 Trainer of Trainers (ToT)

(83 percent male and 17 percent female) and refresher training for 55 District Facil-

itators (76 percent male and 24 percent female) in April 2018, and 377 Sub-District

Facilitators (64 percent male and 36 percent female) in August 2018. In turn, these

facilitators helped facilitate the training of 3,105 HDWs (100 percent of expected

HDWs) at the village level.

Since the Generasi integration commenced, districts and villages (as supported

by Generasi Facilitators) have increasingly prioritized health and education ser-

vices in regular village development. A critical part of Generasi Facilitators’ role

is to advocate the importance of investing in basic health and education services,

and to support district governments to create an enabling environment for villag-

es to invest in these services. For example, Generasi Facilitators have supported

district governments to develop and issue district regulations (Peraturan Bupati, or

Perbup), which permit villages to fund health and education services using village

budgets (Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Desa, or APBDes). Since 2016, 25 of

66 Generasi districts have issued 37 Perbups or Head of District Letters “prioritiz-

ing health and education using Dana Desa” due to Generasi’s investment in local

capacity building and advocacy.51,52 Perbups and Head of District are significant as

they not only empower community groups to advocate for health and education

services at the village level, but they also create an authorizing environment for

village leaders to respond to these demands and to sustain village spending on

health and education services in their annual budgets. As field interviews with vil-

lage heads highlighted, budget allocations for social services often increased after

clear regulations were created at the district level. For example, some villages in

Cianjur District shifted village budget allocations for social services from 20 percent

(in 2017) to up to 40 percent (in 2018) following the issuing of a 2018 Cianjur District

Head Letter, which prioritized activities to prevent stunting. Further, from 2016 to

2017, Generasi’s village budget monitoring system indicated an increase in village

allocations for health and education activities across Generasi locations. For ex-

ample, health and education spending increased, on average, from 14.7 percent (in

2016) to 15.8 percent across 4,277 villages (in 2017). However, in 2018 health and

education spending actually decreased, on average, to 10.2 percent across 5,316

villages. It is likely this decrease in spending is a result of the President’s Instruction

and subsequent MoV-MoHA-MoF-Bappenas Joint Decree on the Cash-For-Work Ini-

tiative (Padat Karya Tunai).53

While the Generasi-Village Law integration work has made some positive

achievements, given the scale of the work, there has been varied success of

integration activities. For example, not all Generasi districts issued Perbups and

increased village funding allocations for basic service delivery. LSP found that the

success of integration activities often depended upon district heads’ commitment to

prioritize Generasi-type activities within Perbups or Head of District Letters, village

heads and facilitators’ capacity, and the timing of village planning. LSP recognizes

these challenges and in 2019 will continue to help MoV integrate and sustain Gener-

asi-focused activities (e.g., human capital development) into regular village planning

and budgeting via the INEY PforR Operation using the HDW model.

Building on this experience, LSP supported the GoI HDW Pilot to adopt a similar

approach — to that used by Generasi — to support village governments increase

51 In 2018 (as of 31 December 2018), 15 district governments issued 21 Perbups. The remaining 16 Perbups were issued over 2016 and 2017 (af-ter the Generasi Integration Strategy commenced) (Source: Local Government Regulation Database, 2018).52 Note, there was no target set for the number of issued Perbups or District Head Letters as the pri-mary purpose of the Generasi Integration Strategy was to increase spending on health and education services using Dana Desa. Issuing a Perbup or District Letter Head was not necessary in all dis-tricts to encourage increased village spending on basic services. However, in instances where it was deemed necessary, Generasi facilitators focused on supporting districts to issue such regulations or letters.53 The Cash-for-Work initiative requires villages to allocate a minimum of 30 percent of Dana Desa for cash-intensive work. Due to this instruction, villag-es increasingly used Dana Desa for infrastructure rather than for non-infrastructure purposes, such as basic social services.

FIGURE 6

Perbups or Head of District Letters Issued in Generasi Locations

P E R B U P S / H E A D O F D I S T R I C T

L E T T E R S I S S U E D T H A T

P R I O R I T I Z E H E A L T H A N D

E D U C A T I O N U S I N G D A N A D E S A

37

Empower community groups to advocate for health and educa-tion at the village level

Create an authorizing environ-ment for village heads to re-spond to demands

Enable villages to sustain spending on health & education services

22

spending on locally-needed basic services, particularly priority stunting interven-

tions. As part of the pilot, HDWs are responsible for delivering a set of five core

tasks to support village-level convergence (see Box 4), working with a range of lo-

cal actors (communities, service providers, and village leaders) to prioritize stunting

prevention efforts at the local level. One of HDWs’ core tasks involves advocating

and working with village heads to ensure that village budgets and plans prioritize

and allocate increased Dana Desa for stunting. Beyond advocating to village heads,

some HDWs also actively engage with the district government, the Regional Legisla-

tive Council and the Village Community Development Agency to determine and pro-

vide advice to villages about which activities can and cannot be funded using Dana

Desa. Reports from the field suggest that HDWs have already positively impacted

village planning and budgeting practices. For example, LSP monitoring found that

HDWs have used social mapping to advocate for increased Dana Desa spending

on new services — such as WASH infrastructure for 1,000-day households in Man-

tang, Lombok. Furthermore, in Trenggalek District, HDWs in three priority villages

were able to assist villages to collect and verify data (verified by Posyandu and

Puskesmas), which was used for village planning and budgeting. Based on this data,

and subsequent planning and budgeting, all related basic social services, including

stunting, will be addressed by relevant Dinas authorities.

In 2018, the GoI committed to scaling the HDW Pilot to all 160 priority stunting

districts during 2019 to increase Dana Desa spending on stunting-related inter-

ventions as part to INEY PforR Operation (Results Area 4, Converging Village Ser-

vice Delivery).54 As part of the scaling, in December 2018, MoV issued the General

Guidelines (Pedoman Umum) on HDWs, in all new locations, to help villages recruit,

train, and mobilize HDWs. Going forward, LSP, via the INEY PforR, will provide incen-

tives to relevant agencies (Bappenas, MoHA and MoV) to enhance the guidelines

and systems to mobilize HDWs to support convergence of village-level service de-

livery. See Box 5 for further details about LSP’s recommended actions to MoV to

strengthen the HDW implementation and scaling in 2019 and beyond.

Building on LSP’s support for the VIP Operation during 2017, in 2018 the Facility

continued to support MoV to utilize a peer-to-peer learning approach to help vil-

lages generate, fund, and implement solutions to address local service delivery

challenges. As a continuation of LSP’s 2017 support,55 in 2018 the VIP project team

provided further operational and implementation assistance to MoV to hold Bursa

Inovasi Desa across 426 Indonesian districts. While the VIP experienced some op-

erational challenges during the first half of 2018, LSP was able to provide additional

technical and monitoring support to minimize delays and accelerate program im-

plementation.56 The World Bank also supported MoV’s request to extend the op-

eration’s closing date (from 31 December 2018 until 31 December 2019) to enable

MoV to achieve intended objectives and key performance indicators as originally

planned.57 Over 2018, the 426 district-level Bursa Inovasi Desa (98 percent of the

434 target districts) brought together approximately 176,000 participants (approxi-

mately 74 percent male and 26 percent female) from 71,024 villages to learn from

one another about innovative solutions to local development challenges. Partici-

pants included various village representatives (government, councils, and communi-

ty actors). The Bursa Inovasi Desa generated 69,786 “commitments”58 and 29,829

“idea cards” (Kartu IDE, or Inovasi Desaku).59 MoV’s monitoring system shows that

a significant proportion (approximately 42 percent) of villages that participated in

the 2017 Bursa Inovasi Desa replicated and funded innovations using their own vil-

lage plans and budgets during 2018.60 To support the rollout of Bursa Inovasi Desa

and to strengthen district capacity to capture innovations, over 2018 LSP supported

MoV to train VIP village, sub-district, and district facilitators and expert staff. Specif-

CHAPTER FOUR

54 Under the INEY PforR Operation, Results Area 4 focuses on converging village-level service delivery. See Box 6 on p. 19 for further details about the INEY PforR Operation.55 In 2017, LSP supported MoV by providing spe-cialized technical and operational assistance to generate learning and innovations across 32,781 villages through 236 district-level Village Innovation Exchanges (Bursa Inovasi Desa, or Bursa) events. The Bursa brought together nearly 186,000 partici-pants (estimated 55,300 women) at the district level and generated over 23,500 village “commitments” to replicate innovative human capital, infrastructure, and entrepreneurial ideas.56 Over the first half of 2018, MoV experienced var-ious annual work planning, budgeting, and project management issues, which slowed project imple-mentation from February to August 2018. To mini-mize program implementation disruptions, LSP pro-vided increased capacity and technical support. For example, LSP supported MoV to establish a monitor-ing system to identify, track and resolve bottlenecks; prepare key operational documents (guidelines, training modules and tools for innovation replica-tion); and better integrate the current facilitation structure with VIP. In September 2018, MoV and the World Bank held a high-level meeting to agree on key actions to accelerate program implementation in 2018 and to help ensure more timely implemen-tation in 2019.57 Despite the extension, MoV and LSP recognize that, given the nature of the project, coordination among counterparts will continue to pose challeng-es during 2019. In recognition of this, LSP will con-tinue to provide additional technical and operational assistance to support MoV monitor and mitigate po-tential coordination risks.58 “Commitments” refer to instances where village representatives expressed a commitment to repli-cate an innovation idea in their own village.59 The entrepreneurship, human capital, and village infrastructure ideas generated were wide-ranging and included using information technology for on-line ticketing for village tourism, establishing an inte-grated building for early years health and education activities, and establishing a village products market.60 As of June 2018, approximately 42 percent of sur-veyed village governments (3,996 of 9,563 villages) that participated in the 2017 Bursa Inovasi Desa committed village budget (APBDes) funds to adopt and replicate innovation ideas locally.

23PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO ONE

FIGURE 7

Bursa Inovasi Desa in 2018BOX 7.

From Indonesia to the World: Innovative Villages In October 2018, the VIP Task Team supported MoV to showcase the program at the fourth High-Level Meeting (HLM4) on Country-Led Knowledge Sharing, which was a sideline event of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) – World Bank Annual Meetings in Bali, Indonesia. As part of the event, MoV presented its national village innovation and knowledge-sharing platform to an audience of over 300 partici-pants from 41 countries.

The event was well received, and participants were particularly interested in the process for implementing knowledge-sharing on a national scale. Participants also learnt about the steps to identify, document and replicate innovations across nearly 75,000 villages. Over 150 participants also had the opportunity to directly observe a district-based Bursa Inovasi Desa.

ically, LSP supported the training by reviewing the training modules, facilitating a

workshop to finalize the modules, and monitoring and supervising some of MoV-led

trainings. In 2018, MoV used the revised materials to train:

• 324 Village Community Empowerment Expert Staff (89 percent of the 364 target);

• 2,484 District-Level Facilitators (17 percent female and 83 percent males);

• 15,305 Sub-District-Facilitators for Village Empowerment and Village Infrastruc-

ture Engineers (23 percent female and 77 percent male); and

• 19,851 Village Facilitators (24 percent female and 76 percent male).

Over October and November 2018, LSP also supported MoV to train 434 District

Innovation Teams (Tim Inovasi Kabupaten, or TIK) and 6,446 Village Empowerment

and Innovation Teams (who are responsible for capturing innovations) about how to

implement Bursa Inovasi Desa.

To help villages implement the innovative solutions generated through Bursa Inovasi Desa, LSP also supported MoV to establish the Technical Service Pro-

viders (TSP) model under the VIP Operation. The TSP model allows villages to

procure or hire third-party facilitation (e.g., individuals and/or institutions such as

local firms, CSOs, NGOs, or universities) to provide technical assistance and capac-

ity building support to solve specific village development issues. The model aims

to complement and fill the expertise gaps within MoV’s existing facilitator structure.

As part of LSP’s support for the VIP Operation, the Facility is supporting MoV to

identify and build the capacity of approximately 2,600 TSPs. In 2018, LSP supported

MoV’s TSP training by assisting the ministry develop training curriculum, modules,

D I S T R I C T - L E V E L

B U R S A I N O V A S I D E S A H E L D

V I L L A G E P A R T I C I P A T E D

P A R T I C I P A N T S

I N N O V A T I O N

“ C O M M I T M E N T S ” M A D E

V I L L A G E S C O M M I T E D

V I L L A G E F U N D S T O

R E P L I C A T E I N N O V A T I O N S

426

71,024

176,000

69,786

42%

Bursa Inovasi Desa in Bali

24 CHAPTER FOUR

and guidelines, which focused on improving TSPs’ role in

assisting villages and developing business plans to sustain

services.61 In 2018, MoV used these materials to train 17 Grand

Master Trainers (GMTs) (100 percent of the GMT target), 30

Master Trainers (85 percent of the 35 target) (85 percent male

and 15 percent female), 264 Trainer of Trainers (ToTs) (83 per-

cent of the targeted 324 ToTs), and 2,317 TSPs across 29 of

the expected 33 provinces.62 In 2019, LSP will focus on accel-

erating the project implementation to ensure all activities are

implemented on schedule and in line with village timelines.

Given it is the last year of project implementation, LSP will

also focus on compiling project outputs and best practices

and developing a sustainability strategy.

Going forward, LSP will leverage its knowledge, analytics,

and technical assistance to inform the new proposed Vil-

lage Operation, which aims to help MoV embed more sys-

tematic, inclusive and participatory village planning and

budgeting across Indonesia’s villages. Component 2 of the

Village Operation (Promoting Participatory Village Develop-

ment) will focus on strengthening MoV’s systems for capacity

support and village development. This will involve revamp-

ing MoV’s existing programs, so that they are more flexible,

able to better respond to needs, and facilitate innovation and

61 Specifically, LSP reviewed MoV-developed training curriculum, modules, and guidelines and facilitated a workshop to finalize them. 62 TSP training in the remaining four provinces is expected to be held in early 2019.63 MoV’s Akademi Desa is an online learning academy for communities, which will provide links to digital and interactive content and offline learning oppor-tunities.64 MoV’s GoDesa will be a task management platform that digitizes all facil-itators functions, including time-stamped and geo-tagged community visits validated by the village apparatus. It will also provide a digital marketplace for TSPs, providing a demand-driven gateway for communities to connect with TSPs to match their dynamic and emerging needs. RuangDesa is a chat ap-plication for village facilitators. The platform was developed by MoV and the DFAT-funded KOMPAK and is currently used to broadcast messages from MoV to all facilitators.

BOX 8.

Engaging the Private Sector and Utilizing Technologies to Drive Service Delivery and Village De-velopment Improvements

A key focus of LSP is to deliver innovative local-based

solutions to drive improvements in village development.

In 2018, LSP focused on supporting the GoI implement

innovative ways to help villages connect with the pri-

vate sector to improve village-level outcomes. For ex-

ample, for the second year in a row, LSP assisted MoV

deliver Bursa Inovasi Desa across Indonesia’s districts

to help villages generate and share innovations and

learnings about local solutions to local development

problems. In 2018, 426 Bursa Inovasi Desa brought to-

gether over 176,000 participants from 71,024 villages at

the district level to learn from one another.

During the reporting period, LSP also focused on identi-

fying and pursuing various technology-based solutions

to drive improvements in service delivery and inclusion.

While some progress was made during the reporting

period, LSP will need to mobilize additional financial re-

sources to refine, pilot test, and finalize the designs of

the different initiatives in 2019. Key initiatives include:

cross-learning to strengthen community capacity. The opera-

tion aims to achieve this through targeted interventions that

strengthen systems for community learning (e.g., Bursa Ino-

vasi Desa and Akademi Desa 4.0);63 information sharing (e.g.,

GoDesa and Ruang Desa);64 facilitation support to commu-

nities (e.g., digitizing MoV’s facilitation services system), and

facilitating access to services through digital marketplaces.

In 2019, LSP-generated knowledge (e.g., through the Village

Law PASA and VIP Operation) and technical assistance will

be used to inform and finalize the design of the Village Op-

eration.

• GoDesa: Supporting MoV to develop a digital platform

for villages to access information and services. It is

intended that the platform will digitize facilitator ser-

vices, integrate feedback and payment mechanisms,

and create marketplaces linking villages with TSPs. An

early version of the digitized facilitator services appli-

cation will be presented to MoV in February 2019 to

gain feedback about the application’s test design.

• eHDW: Supporting MoV and MoF to develop an HDW

Application to help track, through real-time data col-

lection, households and villages’ progress related

to key stunting “convergence indicators”. In 2019, if

adequate funding is mobilized, LSP will support the

application design, field testing (in five districts), and

refinement.

• KIAT Kamera (v.2): MoEC and TNP2K to upgrade

the KIAT Kamera to support KIAT Guru Phase 2. KIAT

Kamera is a tamper-proof Android-based application

that provides accurate data on daily teacher atten-

dance in rural primary schools. In 2019, LSP will support

the KIAT Kamera upgrade to allow pilot stakeholders

to record teacher presence, along with performance

and social accountability. In February 2019, LSP will

commence consultations with central and district-lev-

el stakeholders about the KIAT Kamera App’s design

and development.

25CHAPTER FIVE

Progress Towards EOFO Two: National and Local Governments Make Better Use of Fiscal Resources

05The Village Law’s success in reducing poverty and inequality ultimately relies on

the ability of national and local governments to spend their fiscal resources ef-

fectively. The 2017 LSP-supported ViPER analyses shows that, on average, villages

can spend a large proportion of their funds (approximately 40 percent) on village ad-

ministration costs, which is high.65 Meanwhile, the draft LSP-supported Sentinel Vil-

lages Study also demonstrates the importance of consolidating village development

spending for higher-level outcomes and impacts. After four years of implementation,

the GoI is increasingly focused on improving the quality of village spending. Going

forward, this will involve maximizing the Village Law’s impact for rural and poor vil-

lages by improving both how villages decide to spend their funds and how well they

execute these activities.

ADEQUACY OF PROGRESS AGAINST OUTCOME

On Track A little off track Behind

65 This is above the 30 percent ceiling.

Identification of village needs in Village meeting in Cibadak Village, Cianjur District, West Java

26

EOFO 2 focuses on supporting the GoI to make more effective use of its re-

sources so that they better reach the poor and contribute to reducing poverty

and inequality. Under this EOFO, LSP is working to strengthen national frameworks

and systems to track village finances and outputs, to ensure the allocation of Dana

Desa to villages is more pro-poor and equitable, to strengthen communities and vil-

lage governments’ capacity to manage increased finances, and to encourage local

data-driven planning and budgeting. During the reporting period, key LSP projects

and initiatives implemented under EOFO 2 include the Village Law PASA, Manag-

ing-for-Results Project, and MELAYANI.

Overall, progress towards EOFO 2 is largely ‘on track’. While LSP achieved mul-

tiple key milestones (Figure 8), in terms of planned activities — as per the LSP Ac-

tivity Tracker — progress is slightly behind schedule. For example, 85 percent of

activities under EOFO 2 were either completed or are on track to be completed as

scheduled. Meanwhile, five percent were dropped/realigned, and 10 percent are

still under preparation.66 Delays or challenges were predominately related to VIP

and the MELAYANI Pilot. Under EOFO 2, some VIP activities were delayed due to

MoV’s work planning and budgeting issues during the first half of 2018.67 Further,

some VIP activities relating to village data management did not proceed as planned

due to changes in the activities’ design and the support needed.68 Finally, in some

MELAYANI Pilot locations implementation took longer than anticipated due to varied

political commitment and some districts underestimating the time needed to imple-

ment the pilot’s iterative process (see Chapter 5.4 p. 34 for further details).

CHAPTER FIVE

• To enable more effective tracking and reporting of village finances and

outputs, LSP supported the GoI to rollout the recently issued Permendagri

No. 20/2018 - the key policy guiding VFM across Indonesia - which was

informed by LSP and KOMPAK analysis and support in 2017.

• The World Bank and the GoI launched preparation for the Village Operation

- which incorporates and institutionalizes knowledge and lessions from

the Village Law PASA and VIP - to improve the quality of village spending

and the impact of the GOI’s US$ 7 billion in Dana Desa spending.

• The LSP-supported Special Allocation Fund (DAK) for Stunting Pilot and

technical inputs informed MoF’s draft Regulation on DAK for stunting,

which incentivizes districts to converge delivery of nutrition interventions

and maximize the effectiveness of district spending.

• The LSP-supported MELAYANI Pilot generated important lessons about

district problem solving, planning and budgeting practices, which will in-

form LSP’s support for the NatStrat Stunting (via MELAYANI Phase 2 and

the INEY PforR) to improve district government capacity to understand

and solve stunting-related issues.

66 During the reporting period, 41 activities were tracked under EOFO 2 in the LSP Activity Tracker. See Annex 3 for further details.67 Over the first half of 2018, MoV experienced various annual work planning, budgeting, and project management issues, which slowed project implementation from February to August 2018. To minimize program implementation disruptions, LSP provided increased capacity and technical sup-port. For example, LSP supported MoV to establish a monitoring system to identify, track and resolve bottlenecks; prepare key operational documents (guidelines, training modules and tools for innova-tion replication); and better integrate the current facilitation structure with VIP. In September 2018, MoV and the World Bank held a high-level meet-ing to agree on key actions to accelerate program implementation in 2018 and to help ensure more timely implementation in 2019.68 See Annex 3: Activity Tracker – VIP on p. 91-95 for further details.

FIGURE 8

LSP’s Major EOFO 2 Milestones during January to December 2018

BETTER USE OF FISCAL RESOURCES

27PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO TWO

CHAPTER 5.1

Outcome 1: Strengthened national framework and sys-tems for tracking village finances and outputs

To enable more systematic and effec-

tive government tracking and report-

ing of village finances and outputs, LSP

supported the GoI to rollout and imple-

ment the recently issued Permendagri No. 20/2018 — the key policy guiding

Village Financial Management (VFM)

across Indonesia. In April 2018, MoHA

enacted the new regulation on VFM

(Permendagri No. 20/2018) which was

informed by LSP’s ViPER analyses and

technical assistance, along with KOM-

PAK assistance, during 2017.69 The new

regulation better aligns the economic

classifications used in village and na-

tional-level reporting, making it easier

for the GoI to track, consolidate, analyze,

and effectively manage village finances.

It also requires activity implementation

and output reporting. This new require-

ment allows citizens and higher levels

of government to better understand

the actual results achieved from Dana

Desa spending, which will help improve

transparency and provide an important

tool for both top-down monitoring and

bottom-up social accountability. During

the reporting period LSP, together with

KOMPAK, supported the GoI to imple-

ment Permendagri No. 20/2018 by im-

proving awareness and understanding

about the new VFM regulation — at dis-

trict, sub-district, village, and community

levels — through a dissemination cam-

paign. To support MoHA’s campaign,

LSP and KOMPAK prepared dissemina-

tion materials, including a wall calendar

and an infographic concerning four top-

ics: overview of VFM, village financial

planning, implementation and adminis-

tration of village finances, and village fi-

nancial reports and accountability. Over

June and July 2018, LSP and KOMPAK

supported MoHA to seek feedback on

the socialization materials from vari-

ous participants, including provincial,

district, sub-district and village govern-

ment staff. MoHA disseminated the re-

vised materials, over the second half of

2018 (July to September), through vari-

ous types of media such as Facebook,

WhatsApp groups, and local govern-

ment websites. Overall, the materials

were well received by MoHA and the

ministry requested additional support

for other VFM materials and infograph-

ics to cater to different populations and

regions.

Beyond informing the national regu-

lation on VFM, LSP also continued to

support the GoI strengthen core na-

tional systems to enable better quality

village spending and output tracking.

During 2018, LSP provided technical

assistance to MoF to strengthen the

ministry’s existing Online Monitoring

Application of the State Treasury and

State Budget (Online Monitoring Sistem

69 In 2017, LSP and KOMPAK provided analytical, technical, and policy advice to the GoI to inform MoHA’s Permendagri No. 20/2018 on VFM. Prior to mid-2015, LSP-World Bank led support to MoHA in revising the Permendagri. However, following a request from the GoI and in coordination with LSP-World Bank, KOMPAK took the lead from mid-2015 onwards. Despite this, LSP continued to provide substantial technical inputs based on the Facility’s ViPER analyses which were key to informing and formulating the new Permendagri No. 20/2018.

Local government apparatus checks the village funds management data recorded in the system.

28 CHAPTER FIVE

Perbendaharaan dan Anggaran Negara, or OM-SPAN)70 system, so that it better

functions as a transaction processing system to enable improved reporting and un-

derstanding about results achieved through village spending.71 As part of this work,

LSP provided MoF with technical inputs and recommendations to help strengthen

OM-SPAN’s new functionality enhancements (in line with Permendagri No. 20/2018).

Specifically, LSP is supporting the Directorate General (DG) Treasury to improve the

quality of the Dana Desa and Physical Special Allocation Fund (DAK Fisik) output

data, which are collected through OM-SPAN, by standardizing and ensuring the out-

put nomenclatures (labels) and their metrics are consistent with Permendagri No.

20/2018’s new classification structure.72 LSP is currently finalizing a report, which

documents these analyses and recommendations. The report is currently undergo-

ing internal reviews and is expected to be finalized in mid-2019. During 2018, LSP

also undertook analysis (through an LSP-funded technical consultant) on the 2017

National Dana Desa outputs.73 The analyses indicated that there are variations in

OM-SPAN’s output data metrics, and activity and output nomenclatures. Based on

the initial analyses, LSP recommended that MoHA improve and standardize the ac-

tivity and output nomenclatures in Permendagri No. 20/2018 and standardize activ-

ity and output metrics. MoHA accepted these recommendations and consequently

issued a letter to DG Treasury (with copy to DG Fiscal Balance of MoF, and DG Com-

munity Empowerment of MoV) about OM-SPAN’s revised activity and output nomen-

clatures, related codes, and metrics. The letter stipulates that all Dana Desa report-

ing through OM-SPAN should use the revised nomenclatures, codes, and metrics.

LSP is also working to broaden the GoI’s knowledge and understanding about

the quality of village outputs (such as infrastructure), including via the Village

Infrastructure Quality Audit. To better understand the quality of village outputs,

LSP launched the Village Infrastructure Quality Audit in May 2018. The audit builds

on and complements the LSP-supported ViPER in 2017, which provided insights into

villages’ expenditure, and highlighted the need for further analysis to better under-

stand the quality of village spending under the Village Law. Given that infrastructure

is one of the largest proportions of village spending, LSP launched the Village Infra-

structure Audit to assess the quality of village infrastructure using a sample meth-

odology applied under previous CDD programs. Although the sample is relatively

small, the assessment is significant as it provides the first rigorous analysis of the

quality and value-for-money of outputs (infrastructure) constructed under the Village

Law. During May to July 2018, LSP reviewed the quality and construction process

of 165 infrastructure sub-projects, across 58 villages in six provinces.74 Initial draft

findings indicate that of the sub-projects sampled, 75% were rated “satisfactory” or

“moderately satisfactory. Other emerging findings include:

• The majority (84 percent) of village committees either fully or somewhat met the

Village Law requirements set out in MoHA’s Village Development Guidelines (Per-

mendagri No. 114/2014);

• Many village-level infrastructure projects (such as roads, water systems and irri-

gation) have limited technical documentation (e.g., designs, engineering calcula-

tions, and surveys);75

• The majority (64 percent) of village committee’s procurement practices were

somewhat compliant with regulations and 18 percent were found to be fully com-

pliant;

• Some villages were dissatisfied with the technical supervision provided by

sub-districts;

• User groups were not always included in infrastructure design consultations;76

and

• In some villages, there is limited investments in operations and maintenance.

70 OM-SPAN is an application used to monitor transactions within the State Treasury System and the State Budget (SPAN) and presents information through a web-based network. OM-SPAN was cre-ated to provide fast, accurate, detailed, and inte-grated information services on SPAN. The applica-tion is web-based and can be accessed via a web browser such as Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, and other browsers.71 Originally, OM-SPAN was designed as a trans-action monitoring and reporting tool. However, following the recent enactment of Permendagri No.20/2018, OM-SPAN’s functionality was broad-ened to act as a transaction processing system. 72 This assistance builds upon LSP’s quality as-surance support to the Village Finance System (Sistem Keuangan Desa, or Siskeudes) last year. In 2017, LSP supported the GoI upgrade and rollout of Siskeudes, including funding technical assistance to support improvements to the Siskeudes system, a trial before the upgraded system was launched, and training modules to support the system roll-out. As of March 2018, the GoI has introduced Sis-keudes (as part of the broader effort to socialize VFM regulations and policies) in 70,411 villages; and provided training on Siskeudes to 69,405 vil-lages. 73 LSP inputs were based on the 2017 VIPER work. 74 Including Aceh, West Kalimantan, West Java, West Sulawesi, Maluku, and NTT.75 For example, 46 percent of audited sub-projects had no design drawings, minimal design calcula-tions, or detailed quantity measurements.76 For example, 53 percent of sub-project had little or no design consultation with user groups.

29PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO TWO

To date, the audit’s draft results have helped shape dialogue

with the GoI about the new proposed Village Operation, in-

cluding about how infrastructure quality has changed since the

enactment of the Village Law, and identifying the right type of

support to ensure villages deliver more effective services and

infrastructure. In early 2019, LSP will undertake further analysis

to understand the critical factors (e.g., technical documentation,

procurement, technical supervision, etc.) influencing the quality

of infrastructure. LSP will also formulate a series of recommen-

dations, including strategies to increase villages’ capacity to

plan, budget, operate, and maintain village infrastructure more

effectively and efficiently. LSP will finalize and share the audit’s

results and recommendations next year.

In support of the GoI’s NatStrat Stunting, in April 2018 LSP

also launched the Managing-for-Results Project to strength-

en the GoI’s capacity to track and manage nutrition-related

service delivery (budget and performance) across different

levels of government. At the national level, the project sup-

ports the GoI (Bappenas, MoF, MoHA, TNP2K, and other rel-

evant line ministries) to strengthen national monitoring, and

results-based budgeting and performance systems to help

better coordinate the delivery of national stunting-related pro-

grams. Meanwhile, at the sub-national level, Managing-for-Re-

sults aims to strengthen district-level budgeting and perfor-

mance systems, capacity, governance arrangements, and data

collection systems to improve overall district convergence of

stunting interventions. To help strengthen national systems, the

Managing-for-Results Project is providing technical and advi-

sory support to Bappenas and MoF on expenditure tagging

and analysis, and inter-government fiscal reforms for stunting

preventions; Sekretariat Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia

(Setwapres)-TNP2K on improving systems for monitoring the

NatStrat Stunting’s implementation; and MoHA on building

provincial government capacity to support districts implement

stunting convergence actions.

To enable the GoI to synchronize stunting-related planning

and budgeting – as outlined in the Government Regulation

(PP) No. 17/2017 – LSP supported Bappenas and MoF who

issued the Manual on Tagging, Monitoring and Evaluating

the Development and Budget Performance for Accelerating

Stunting Reduction. Since April 2018, LSP has provided tech-

nical assistance and supported inter-ministerial dialogue to as-

sist Bappenas and MoF in developing the manual. In December

2018, the Deputy Minister for Human Development, Community

and Culture within Bappenas and the Director General of Bud-

get within the Ministry of Finance signed the manual. Under

the manual, Bappenas and MoF have agreed to work jointly

in: (1) tagging, monitoring and evaluating the performance of

stunting related interventions and outputs; and (2) using the

evaluation results to inform next year’s annual budget alloca-

tions. As part of this work, the two ministries have committed to

exchanging data and information, and conducting a “thematic”

program performance review. The manual is significant as it

not only helps the GoI identify and track budget allocated for

stunting interventions across central government, but also

helps bring together Bappenas and MoF’s previously sep-

arate stunting-related planning, budgeting, and evaluation

processes. The manual also represents the first technical

implementation guidelines of PP No. 17/2017 and supports

the principle of “money to follow program”, rather than the

existing regular practice of “money to follow function (or-

ganization)”. The guidelines also provide a reliable model

that can be replicated by other ministries to evaluate per-

formance of other national priority programs. In 2019, LSP

will support technical training with Bappenas, MoF, and other

relevant lines ministries to enable the GoI to conduct effi-

cient and effective stunting related budget evaluations and

performance reviews.

To support nutrition-related service delivery at the district

level, MoF formulated a Regulation on Special Allocation

Fund (Dana Alokasi Khusus, or DAK), which was informed

by LSP’s technical advice and lessons from the LSP-sup-

ported DAK Pilot (via the Managing-for-Results Project). LSP

supported analysis, which was conducted as part of the INEY

preparations over 2017, found that district governments’ allo-

cation of resources do not always necessarily respond to lo-

cal needs, and that districts’ guidance to villages about how

they can use their fiscal resources for nutrition interventions

is at times limited. The DAK for Stunting aims to incentivize

districts to converge the delivery of nutrition interventions

on priority households and thereby maximize the effective-

ness of district spending on stunting prevention. Between

April and July 2018, LSP provided MoF with advisory ser-

vices and technical assistance to design and test a perfor-

mance-based programmatic DAK pilot (in five districts).77 The

pilot, which concluded in August 2018, generated important

lessons and recommendations to inform the design of the

DAK for Stunting,78 including about the appropriateness of

the central government’s 10 priority villages,79 and the scope

for reallocating or redirecting DAK funds to identified priority

locations within the financial year (FY). These lessons were

presented at an Inter-Ministerial Working Group (including

77 Specifically, LSP-supported technical advisors assisted district govern-ments collect data on stunting prevalence and interventions coverage; conduct diagnostics to identify priority locations and services; use those diagnostic results to re-program DAK Non-Fisik for 2018; develop the DAK proposal for 2019; and organize district-level Stunting Summits (Rembuk).78 Including the Technical Guidelines for the DAK (including a menu of activ-ities, which can be funded under the DAK); the formulation of performance indicators relating to compliance, effort, and outcomes; DAK reporting pro-cedures and formats; and capacity development needs for districts/cities implementing the DAK.79 The pilot found that the 10 priority villages (which were identified by the central government) were no worse-off than other villages in the district in terms of convergence. However, resources were focused on them as a result of priority designation. The pilot found that this priority designation could lead to the GoI mistargeting resources.

30 CHAPTER FIVE

Minister of Villages, Eko Putro Sandjojo, discussing the Cianjur District Government’s stunting prevention program.

MoF, Bappenas, MoH, and Ministry of Public Works) meeting in October 2018. To

date, lessons from the pilot have informed the GoI’s draft MoF Regulation (PMK)

on DAK Stunting, the Bappenas Convergence Guidelines for Districts and Cities,

and MoHA’s Provincial Technical Assistance (TA) Pool to support district govern-

ments. For example, the GoI removed the centralized targeting approach (which

automatically prioritized 10 villages) and instead will allow district governments to

identify priority locations based on their own diagnostics of stunting prevalence

and interventions coverage. The DAK Pilot’s experiences also informed Bappenas’

Convergence Guidelines in terms of the types of district-level organizations which

can be utilized as a coordination platform.80 The diagnostics approach and instru-

ments used in the pilot were also adjusted in line with the District Convergence

Action Implementation Guidelines. As part of the INEY PforR Operation, LSP will

support the GoI to scale the performance-based approach to DAK to 160 districts in

2019, and then all 514 districts by 2021. Specifically, the INEY PforR (Results Area 3,

Strengthened Convergence of District Activities) ties US$ 82 million (Rp 1.2 trillion)

in results-based disbursements to roll out the programmatic approach to DAK and

to incentivize districts to increase convergence of nutrition interventions.

Finally, in 2018 LSP also launched the Rural Poverty Analysis to help inform the

GoI’s preparations of the next RPJMN. The analysis focuses on improving under-

standing about and addressing the drivers of rural poverty and economic margin-

alization, as well as identifying opportunities through which village spending can

support more inclusive growth. To date, LSP has generated analyses focused on

80 For example, potential organizations that may be utilized include the Regional Poverty Reduction Coordination Teams, and the Regional Food and Nutrition Action Plan Team.

31PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO TWO

understanding the extent of poverty and vulnerability in Indo-

nesian rural areas, comparing Indonesia’s development out-

comes to global trends, exploring the extent of convergence

across Indonesia’s regions, as well as how policy interventions

(like the Cash-for-Work initiative) can impact poverty. The anal-

yses highlighted that urban-rural gaps remain on one mea-

sures, including GDP per capita, poverty rates, formal sector

labor, and as well as access to basic infrastructure (electricity,

drinking water and sanitation). In terms of convergence, the

analysis highlighted that:

• Papua is on a very different trajectory to other regions;81

• Economic opportunities outside of more urbanized Ja-

va-Bali are very different;

• There are clear sectoral differences across regions (e.g.,

in agriculture and mining), but also common trends in oth-

er sectors (e.g., manufacturing, trade, hotel and restaurant

sectors); and

• There is stronger convergence on education outcomes

than health.

Based on this initial analysis, it is evident that some key knowl-

edge gaps remain both in terms of rural poverty and on how

to improve the Village Law’s impact on rural poverty.

To date, initial findings from the Rural Poverty Analysis have

informed Bappenas’ early preparations for the new RPJMN

2020-24, and dialogue with the GoI about the new pro-

posed Village Operation. In October 2018, LSP shared initial

analyses with Bappenas, who presented the materials at a

Bappenas-led workshop. The workshop was held in Novem-

ber 2018 to present relevant background papers on regional

development to inform preparations and strategic guidance

for the RPJMN. Specifically, LSP-generated evidence relating

to urban versus rural development outcomes, regional vari-

ations, and rural poverty and vulnerability were presented

during the workshop. The analyses have also informed dia-

logue with the GoI about the new proposed Village Operation.

For example, the background literature review helped inform

best practices about improving local governance capacity

and accountability to ensure effective community assets are

built. The analyses also helped removed some uncertainty or

‘myths’ about the Cash-for-Work initiative. Going forward, LSP

will undertake further diagnostics to understand areas of rural

poverty stagnation and deterioration, possible shocks for rural

households, urbanization, and the impact of other trends on

rural household and village infrastructure improvements. It is

expected this analysis will inform specific policy recommenda-

tions about the options to use Dana Desa to support stronger

economic mobility and poverty reduction, improve the Cash-

for-Work initiative, and to leverage Dana Desa for “last mile”

support to rural households. In 2019, LSP will also focus on

undertaking additional diagnostics, and finalizing a report on

rural poverty (expected delivery early 2020), and a detailed

presentation to inform dialogue with the transition team of

the potential new administration (after the April 2019 Indone-

sia Presidential Elections). Concurrently, LSP will also focus

on preparing a series of policy notes and forums, which will

aim to address key knowledge gaps in selected areas and

can provide the GoI with more agile just-in-time technical

assistance to inform the drafting of the RPJMN 2020-2024.

As part of this work, LSP recognizes the need to —and chal-

lenge with — balancing strong quality control of technical

outputs with getting results out quickly to respond to the

GoI’s specific programmatic and policy needs.

Despite this progress, LSP also experienced various oper-

ational challenges and delays with other proposed LED ac-

tivities. In late 2017, the LSP Steering Committee approved

an LED proposal, which included a rural poverty analysis

(Component 1 – see above), support for MoV’s “Public, Pri-

vate, People Partnership” (P4) model for LED (Component 2),

and a national sustainable livelihood review and diagnos-

tics (Component 3). The MoV’s P4 model aims to empow-

er village farm and non-farm entrepreneurs to aggregate

and form productive alliances, use Dana Desa for produc-

tive investments, and empower female entrepreneurs. LSP,

through the LED Pilot, is providing operational and M&E sup-

port to MoV to implement and evaluate the P4 model. How-

ever, during the reporting period, various challenges led to

implementation delays. For example, there were delays with

finalizing the exact scope of the model, the selection criteria

for pilot locations, the role of BUMDes, and the disburse-

ment mechanism. Capacity issues also led to pilot imple-

mentation delays. Despite these challenges, LSP continued

to work with MoV to accelerate the pilot’s implementation.

In 2018, 100 villages were selected for the pilot, 100 villages

established Partnership Teams for Economic Development

to support the pilot’s implementation, and 29 villages re-

ceived the pilot grant funding for LED. Early draft lessons

suggest that the partnership model can enable more inclu-

sive LED. However, the role of local government is critical

for this model to succeed. In mid-2019, LSP will support MoV

to undertake “rapid” testing to generate lessons about how

the partnership model approach can accelerate LED. These

lessons will inform the last six months of the pilot’s imple-

mentation. Finally, over 2018, there were various challeng-

es with agreeing on final scope of work for Component 3.

While the LSP Steering Committee approved the work in late

2017, during follow up discussions, it became apparent that

the GoI’s need and priorities had evolved and that the pre-

viously approved scope of work and modality needed to be

modified. Based on this dialogue, it was agreed to discon-

tinue and reprogram this component. This will be a key LSP

priority in 2019.

81 For example, GDP is declining and inequality is already high.

32

CHAPTER 5.2

Outcome 2: Pilot villages demonstrate finance allocation that is equitable, needs based and pro-poor

CHAPTER FIVE

Village apparatus in Gondang, West Nusa Tenggara use Village Financial Management System (Siskeudes) to manage the village budget

Building on LSP’s previous support to MoF to make the

2018 Dana Desa Allocation Formula fairer, LSP continued

to advocate to make future allocation formula revisions

(including the 2019 formula) more equitable and pro-poor.

In 2017, LSP, along with other DFAT-funded programs (KOM-

PAK, MAHKOTA-TNP2K and the Knowledge Sector Initiative),

supported MoF to refine the 2018 Dana Desa Allocation For-

mula so that Dana Desa is better allocated based on villag-

es’ poverty and development needs.82 As a continuation of

this work, in 2018 LSP provided technical inputs to the DG

of Fiscal Balance (Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuan-

gan, or DJPK) of MoF, which assessed and advocated for

future formula revisions. Specifically, LSP undertook detailed

analysis to understand the impact of the adjusted 2018 for-

mula on various indicators (such as Dana Desa per capita

and different types of villages). LSP also proposed multiple

recommendations to further improve future Dana Desa for-

mulas, such as moving towards a minimum Dana Desa al-

location per village, and better targeting villages receiving

the Allocation Formula (Alokasi Afirmasi). LSP also prepared

simulations for two possible Dana Desa Formula options for

2019 and beyond. LSP documented these analyses in the

‘Allocating Indonesia’s Village Fund (Dana Desa): Promis-

ing Progress and Opportunities for Even Better Poverty and

Development Targeting Working Paper’, which was finalized

and shared with DJPK in June 2018. In November 2018, MoF

I have to thank … the Bank team about recommending how we allocate Dana Desa

[Village Funds], which is more focused on the desa [villages] with more poor people. I think

we adjust that [formula-based allocation] from 10 percent to 20. I think the World Bank put a

slightly better allocation.Minster of Finance, Sri Mulyani Indrawati,

Indonesia Economic Quarterly (IEQ), 28 March, 2018.

issued the 2019 Dana Desa Allocation Formula Policy, which

further reduced the ‘basic allocation’ portion from 77 to 72

percent (in 2017 the ‘basic allocation’ portion was 90 percent)

and increased the ‘formula-based allocation’ portion from 20

to 25 percent (in 2017 the ‘formula-based allocation’ portion

was 10 percent). The ‘affirmation allocation’ portion for ‘lag-

ging’ and ‘very lagging’ villages remained unchanged at three

percent. While LSP did not have direct engagement with DJPK

after providing the technical analyses and inputs in June, the

revised 2019 formula reflects key elements of LSP’s advice

from both 2017 and 2018, including reducing the ‘basic allo-

cation’ and increasing the ‘formula-based allocation’ propor-

tions of the formula. Overall, the latest adjustments represent

a further positive step towards making the GoI’s Dana Desa

allocation fairer and more equitable.

82 In 2017, LSP, together with other DFAT-funded programs (KOMPAK, MAHKOTA-TNP2K, and KSI), provided technical, analytical and policy assistance to the GoI to refine the 2018 Dana Desa Allocation Formula to ensure that Dana Desa transfers are better allocated based on development needs. The revised Dana Desa Allocation Formula resulted in increased equality and fairness for villagers to enable better delivery of basic infrastructure and services.

33PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO TWO

LSP is working with MoHA to inform

national efforts to strengthen village

capacity to manage and use funds

more effectively (including via the Lo-

cal Government Assessment). In March

2018, LSP and the DG for Village Gov-

ernment Oversight (Direktorat Jende-

ral Bina Pemerintahan Desa, or Bina

Pemdes) launched a Local Govern-

ment Assessment, which reviews local

government (district and sub-district)

support in strengthening core village

functions to plan, budget, implement,

report, and monitor village develop-

ment. The assessment builds on the

Sentinel Villages’ Supra-Village Support

analyses (conducted in 2018) and iden-

tifies key bottlenecks and opportunities

to strengthen local government capac-

ity, and possible incentives to improve

their support for villages and the over-

all quality of village spending.83 Over

2018, LSP carried out the Local Gov-

ernment Assessment in three stages,84

including a joint LSP-Bina Pemdes field

visit — which was supported and at-

tended by KOMPAK — in seven districts,

20 sub-districts, and 16 villages to as-

sess actual local government support

to villages. Over October to December

2018, LSP also analyzed district and

sub-district budgets to better under-

stand district funding and expenditures

for village guidance and supervision.

Early results from the draft assessment

suggest that district governments (and

their sub-districts) provide funding, ba-

sic regulations, and supervision support

for villages. However, local government

assistance to villages mainly focuses

on compliance, rather than the quali-

ty of village spending and supporting

processes. The assessment also found

that this is often the case as districts

tend to be constrained by limited staff,

budget, and incentives to carry out

these roles. While LSP initially planned

83 In 2018, LSP conducted the Sentinel Villag-es’ Supra-Village Governments thematic study, which found that supra-village governments play a key role in accountability, but are less active in promoting transparency and providing oversight of community participation in village planning processes. See https://localsolution-stopoverty.org/news/roles-supra-village-gov-ernment-village-law-implementation.html for further details.84 These stages included: (1) analyzing the reg-ulatory framework to understand local govern-ment authorities in implementing Village Law and mapping supporting agencies, and their human resources and budgets; (2) conducting a desk review of existing studies (including by the World Bank, KOMPAK, and others) to under-stand existing knowledge and gaps; and (3) un-dertaking an initial joint LSP and Bina Pemdes field visit in May 2018 to four provinces, includ-ing seven districts and 10 sub-districts, and 16 villages. KOMPAK also attended and supported the field visit.

CHAPTER 5.3

Outcome 3: Village communities and government have improved capacity to manage increased finances

ing; (ii) aligning performance with incen-

tive mechanisms; and (iii) strengthening

village information and data systems

through digital solutions to improve vil-

lage performance M&E (including pro-

curement and payment transactions),

as well as to promote the use of data

in village-level planning and budget-

ing. Taken together, these interventions

will support village institutions to better

access the support systems they need

to improve quality of spending. During

2019, LSP generated knowledge and

evidence will be used to inform and

shape the operation’s final design.

to finalize and share the Local Govern-

ment Assessment results (and the final

report) with relevant stakeholder by the

end of 2018, this was slightly delayed

due to difficulties in obtaining district

and sub-district budget, realization, and

training data. LSP expects to deliver

and disseminate the report to relevant

stakeholders and partners in mid-2019.

It is intended the Local Government

Assessment’s findings will inform Mo-

HA’s (DG Bina Pemdes) role in mobi-

lizing local government support for

village apparatus capacity building,

VFM, and village oversight — includ-

ing MoHA’s Grand Design for Village

Government Capacity Development.

The findings could also be used by the

GoI during the finalization of the RPJMN

after the elections, particularly the sec-

tions focused on village and rural devel-

opment, and poverty reduction. Closely

linked to this, the assessment’s findings

have already informed dialogue with

the GoI about the new proposed Village

Operation’s design. Specifically, knowl-

edge generated about districts’ roles

and needs has informed the operation’s

approach to mobilizing enhanced dis-

trict and sub-district support for village

governance and development.

Going forward, LSP will continue to

leverage analytics and knowledge

generated through Village Law PASA

and VIP to support the new proposed

Village Operation, which will support

the GoI to develop and roll out new

implementation support systems for vil-

lage institutions to improve the quality

of village development plans and pro-

grams. This will be achieved by: (i) sup-

porting the design of new adaptable,

demand-driven systems and approach-

es for capacity building, knowledge

sharing, technical assistance, and learn-

34

CHAPTER 5.4

Outcome 4: Data-driven planning and budgeting at the local-level is strengthened To strengthen districts’ ability to respond to complex local challenges (by using

data-driven planning and budgeting), LSP continued to support the MELAYANI

(Menguraikan Permasalahan Perbaikan Layanan Dasar di Indonesia, or Untan-

gling Problems to Improve Basic Services in Indonesia) Pilot in three districts.

Across Indonesia, many basic infrastructure problems have been addressed.85

However, numerous complex problems remain which require local governments to

actively identify, understand, and respond to specific problems, rather than adopt-

ing a one-size-fits-all approach. The one-year MELAYANI Pilot is testing the innova-

tive problem-driven iterative approach (PDIA)86 to support pilot district governments

analyze problems and implement locally viable solutions. It also aims to generate

knowledge about how districts mobilize resources and collective action to identify

and solve problems. Since commencing in October 2017, LSP-supported coaches

have assisted the three pilot district governments — in Bojonegoro (East Java), Kubu

Raya (West Kalimantan), and Belu (East Nusa Tenggara) — to decide on a problem

to solve, to form problem-solving teams to tackle the issue;87 to collect relevant

data, to undertake problem analysis (e.g., carefully defining and understanding the

problem), to test assumptions (i.e., test what factors contribute to the problem);88

and to develop, implement, and refine solutions (in some pilot locations).

Implementation across the three MELAYANI Pilot locations is varied but has

still led to notable progress and achievements. In Bojonegoro, the district prob-

lem solving team was able to develop, implement, and refine solutions based on

detailed problem analyses. Specifically, the pilot led to the district undertaking a

CHAPTER FIVE

Agriculture is one of the major economic activities for communities in Bayumas District — a Sentinel Villages Study location.

85 For example, governments have built health clinics and schools, and trained many service pro-viders, such as teachers and health workers.86 PDIA is a process that focuses on the problem (not the solution), flexible learning, and adapta-tion. See link for further details: https://bsc.cid.harvard.edu/publications/policy-area/pdia-build-ing-state-capability.87 Problem solving teams were established in response to the identified problem, and gener-ally comprise of local government actors from relevant line district agencies and the Regional Development Planning Agency (Badan Perenca-naan Pembangunan Daerah, or Bappeda). The teams work together to identify, understand, and solve the prioritized district problems, with sup-port from coaches, who are engaged through a World Bank partner.88 See link for an overview of the problem solving process: https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/proj-ect/melayani.html.

35PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO TWO

89 In Belu, this was because the iterative process took longer to execute than originally intended. Meanwhile, in Kubu Raya, varying political com-mitment led to some implementation delays. In both Belu and Kubu Raya, the district teams have undertaken detailed problem analysis, identified solutions, and implemented the solution. How-ever, given the pilot’s timelines, it is unlikely that each district will be able to refine the implement-ed solution as originally planned (and undertaken in Bojonegoro). 90 See Annex 3: Activity Tracker – MELAYANI Pilot on p. 88-91 for further details about the specific steps and activities undertaken in each district as part of the iterative problem solving process.

review of the district’s health personnel rotation policy; and changes in the dis-

trict’s approach for budgeting for maternal and child health programs, and for

post-maternal death occurrence learning. Beyond this, the district problem solving

team also worked with the LSP-supported coach to set up a multi-sectoral prob-

lem-solving team, which will be responsible for sustaining maternal and neo-natal

evidence-based problem solving after the pilot concludes and the LSP-supported

coach’s support finishes. In Belu and Kubu Raya districts, while pilot implementation

process took longer than originally expected,89 the pilot has still led to notable

changes and achievements in each location. For example, in Belu the pilot resulted

in the district changing its approach to improve the quality of education. Specifical-

ly, the district, based on the pilot’s problem-solving process, switched its focus from

improving teacher formal qualifications to prioritizing headmaster leadership and

school management. Meanwhile in Kubu Raya, the district undertook data collec-

tion relating to key stunting intervention coverage and issued a district regulation

(Perbup) that enables villages to prioritize village funds for ECED services.90

Although analyses concerning the MELAYANI Pilot’s outcomes are ongoing, to

date the pilot has generated important early lessons about district problem solv-

ing that will inform MELAYANI Phase 2, which will focus on building district’s

capacity to diagnose and solve stunting-related issues (in support of the NatStrat

Stunting and INEY PforR Operation). To date, the pilot has generated some import-

ant lessons about district-problem solving practices, including:

• Districts tend to revolve around routine and rigid planning and budgeting time-

lines, and devote limited resources to strategic problem solving and improving

implementation;

• Districts often struggle with undertaking basic analysis on problems they identify,

yet support for even rudimentary analytical work can help drive service delivery

improvements;

• Districts are not accustomed to learning from themselves about where (and how

or why) they are succeeding or failing in delivering basic services. Consequently,

they often don’t recognize areas where they fail, and miss opportunities to cele-

brate or spread success; and

• The authorizing environment is critical in some districts (e.g., Kubu Raya), but not

all (e.g., Bojonegoro).

Overall, the current phase of MELAYANI contributed to improved data-driven plan-

ning and budgeting through: (i) improving understanding about how data is current-

ly being used in the three MELAYANI locations; (ii) helping trial a “team” approach

to using data-driven problem solving; and (iii) improving understanding about how

results from this PDIA model can be used within district planning and budgeting

cycles.

LSP is expected to present the pilot’s progress, lessons learned, potential up-

take, and future priorities in a workshop in early 2019. These lessons will inform

MELAYANI Phase 2’s potential capacity building model, which aims to strength-

en district governments’ capacity to understand and solve stunting-related issues.

Specifically, it is expected that the lessons will inform the development of manuals

and guidelines for districts, and future piloting of tools and approaches. It is expect-

ed that this model will be trialed to support the INEY Operation. As part of Phase 2,

the team will also focus on providing ongoing monitoring, developing case studies

to highlight what works and what does not, understanding cross-learning at the

district level, and supporting provinces to play a technical-support role for districts.

Furthermore, in support of the GoI’s NatStrat Stunting, LSP also launched the

Managing-for-Results Project to help strengthen district capacity to diagnose

36

91 The transitional TA Pool will include a national team and regional teams in five provinces (East Java, NTB, West Java, and Papua) and three re-gions (Sumatra, Kalimantan, and Sulawesi).

ganized National Stunting Summit in November 2018, outline practical steps and

actions for district governments to diagnose stunting conditions and service needs

in their regions, and to target, prioritize and ensure convergence (including allo-

cating resources) of critical interventions at the village level. The guidelines are

significant as they provide local governments with the first “how to” guidance to

translate district commitments on stunting reduction into practice. To further sup-

port district government implementation of locally-identified stunting convergence

actions in practice, LSP is also supporting MoHA who is establishing a transitional

provincial technical assistance (TA) Pool. The TA Pool will assist provinces to pro-

vide capacity building to districts to converge stunting-related services (including

undertaking diagnostics, planning, budgeting, and implementing services). The TA

Pool will be overseen by DG Bangda (MoHA) at the national level and the Planning

Agency (Bappeda) at the provincial level.91 To date, LSP has supported the GoI to

raise awareness among provincial governments about their roles. For example, in

November 2018 LSP supported a half-day session (as part of the National Stunting

Summit) which targeted Bappeda and provided them with information about the role

of provinces in supporting district governments to implement convergence actions.

LSP also supported the GoI to conduct preliminary assessments on institutional ar-

rangements, available resources, and platforms for capacity building.

Village governments representatives observe the innovations menu for human capital development category at Bursa Inovasi Desa in Serang District, Banten.

and respond to local needs, and fund

and deliver stunting interventions.

Since April 2018, LSP has provided tech-

nical advice to the GoI as it developed

the Implementation Manual (Pedoman

Pelaksanaan, or Pedum) and Technical

Guidelines (Petunjuk Teknis, or Juknis)

for District Governments to Implement

Stunting Convergence Actions. Spe-

cifically, LSP provided technical advice

and inputs to Bappenas and MoHA, and

supported inter-ministerial dialogue to

inform the guidelines. The guidelines,

which Bappenas and MoHA distributed

to 100 priority districts at the SoVP-or-

37

In 2019, LSP will support the GoI to

reach its district convergence target

— which the GoI committed to via the

INEY PforR — of ensuring 100 priority

districts conduct stunting diagnos-

tics and converge planning and bud-

geting within the first six months of

2019. During the first half of 2019, LSP

will support the GoI to reach its target

by supporting MoHA and provincial

governments to provide training and

guidance to district governments on

implementing the convergence actions

using the guidelines. By conducting

the first convergence actions in the first

few months of 2019,92 it will help en-

sure that the districts’ priority interven-

tions for stunting are incorporated into

their regular development planning and

budgeting processes for FY 2020 at

the earliest stages. LSP will also focus

on distilling lessons about: (1) districts’

ability to translate and implement the

convergence guidelines into practice;

(2) provinces’ capacity to effectively

support districts; and (3) the design of

the TA Pool to support these objectives.

These lessons will be used to further

improve the Managing-for-Results Proj-

ect’s guidance materials and learning

mechanisms in the future. Finally, LSP

will provide technical advice to MoHA in

designing a performance framework to

measure district performance in imple-

menting convergence actions, as well

as guidance and training for provinces

to undertake the first district perfor-

mance assessment in July 2019. Specif-

ically, LSP will provide technical advice

to inform the assessment’s design and

implementation in a way that promotes

cross-district learning. The assessment

is expected to take place in mid-2019.

92 Convergence actions, such as undertaking diag-nostics and developing an action plan to identify priority locations, services/programs, and resource allocation needs.

BOX 9.

Sustainable Investments As part of LSP’s strategy to sustain its support and investments (beyond the life of the MDTF), the Facility directly supports the GoI’s policy agendas; and continues to leverage its knowledge, analytics, and technical assistance to strengthen the GoI’s own systems and capabilities to respond to these priorities. In instances where LSP support for the GoI’s programs is ending, the Facility also works to capture and disseminate lessons learned and ensure their inclusion in regular government processes or future programs. This strategy ensures greater GoI ownership, and potential sustainability of reforms and programs. In terms of research and analytics, LSP has a two-fold strategy to encourage uptake of identified actions. First, the Fa-cility undertakes analytics that are GoI commissioned and respond directly to iden-tified knowledge gaps and/or policy advice. Second, where LSP-led analytics do not directly respond to a GoI request, but are considered particularly relevant to the GoI’s agenda, the Facility engages at multiple levels to build dialogue and to identify appropriate channels to take LSP identified knowledge and actions forward. For example, based on emerging findings from the draft Sentinel Villages Study, LSP advocated and provided technical inputs to MoV’s Permendesa on Priority Use of Village Funds in 2019 about emphasizing poverty reduction, human development and LED at the village level.

In 2019, key achievements where LSP’s support was institutionalized within the GoI’s systems and/or scaled to enable enduring benefits include:

• Various studies indicate that local governments have institutionalized Generasi mechanisms to improve the quality of community institutions, Village Law imple-mentation, and basic service delivery. At the sub-national level, project monitor-ing data and reports from the field show that the project has supported districts to issue regulations that prioritize village basic social service delivery and budget allocations; and helped some villages increase Dana Desa spending on health and education services. Furthermore, the Qualitative Generasi Long-Term Impact Evaluation Study found various examples where local governments have rep-licated the project’s capacity building activities in non-Generasi villages. At the national level, the GoI has institutionalized various Generasi tools and mecha-nisms within national efforts to prevent stunting. For example, MoF incorporated a modified version of Generasi’s community performance scorecard into the MoF Regulation on Village Fund Management (PMK No. 193/PMK.07/2018) to encour-age villages to increase spending on stunting and improve convergence of nu-trition-related interventions for priority households. Further, MoV has institutional-ized the Generasi’s citizen engagement tools (social mapping, outcomes-based needs assessment, village advocacy approach and quarterly village community meetings) within the ministry’s Technical Village Facilitators and District Techni-cal Assistance Training modules. MoEC and MoV will also issue joint guidelines (expected mid-2019) that are based on the approach piloted under the Generasi ECED Frontline Pilot. These results indicate that some Generasi mechanisms can be sustained beyond the life of the program.

• In November 2018, the GoI committed to its four-year NatStrat Stunting to better coordinate and intensify efforts to accelerate stunting reduction across Indone-sia. The strategy leveraged, and was informed by, LSP — along with MAHKO-TA-TNP2K and other World Bank program teams’ — funded data analysis and technical advice. The LSP-supported INEY PforR Operation, which was finalized in May 2018, provides incentives to maximize the NatStrat Stunting’s implementa-tion and impact. The INEY PforR incorporates lessons learned from previous LSP/DFAT-supported work, along with lessons from other World Bank programs and global experiences. For example, it incorporates lessons about Generasi’s facil-itation and community mobilization practices, citizen empowerment tools, and the importance of targeting men in basic service delivery; the ECED Frontline Pilot’s district-based community-focused training system; the HDW Pilot; and the programmatic approach to sector-based conditional (DAK) pilot.

38 CHAPTER FIVE

• The GoI committed to scaling the ECED Frontline Pilot’s district-based training system, via the NatStrat Stunting, to maximize communities’ access to nutrition-sensitive ECED services. As part of the operation, the GoI committed to re-fine, adopt, and scale the pilot’s ECED training system to de-liver the nutrition-sensitive ECED Professional Development Program (Diklat Berjenjang) — within regular Village Law processes — in 100 districts by 2019, 200 districts by 2020, and 300 districts by 2021 (see Chapter 6.1 p. 40 for further details).

• KIAT Guru’s national and sub-national stakeholders are tak-ing ownership of the pilot to ensure its sustainability is more likely. At the national-level, MoEC issued two national regu-lations during 2018 to enable the pilot’s ongoing implemen-tation. In November 2018, MoEC also requested support to scale the KIAT Guru Pilot (KIAT Guru Phase 2) to improve the quality of education services across a greater area. Mean-while district and village governments’ commitment to the pilot is strong and has helped harness national commitment and buy-in. In 2018, districts and villages allocated a total of Rp 9.8 billion (approximately US$ 680,000) for the pilot’s implementation. All five pilot district governments have also expressed interest to sustain implementation in the 203 pilot schools, and to scale field implementation to 183 additional non-pilot schools in 2019, using their own budget.

• Various LSP Village Law related analyses, inputs and recom-mendations were incorporated into the GoI’s national poli-

cies, systems and processes. For example, the Village Law PASA’s analyses on Budget Classification Structures (BCS), Chart of Accounts (CoA), and output reporting, informed Permendagri No. 20/2018 which was issued in May 2018. Meanwhile, Village Law PASA’s technical assistance to sup-port various discussions, public consultations, and policy and legal analyses, also informed Permendagri No. 18/2018 which was issued in April 2018.

Overall these achievements present positive steps towards sustaining LSP-supported projects and activities beyond the life of the MDTF. However, LSP recognizes that many of these initiatives and commitments are complex, multi-sectoral and require strong coordination among multiple counterparts and actors, which presents a risk to sustainability. For example, the success of the NatStrat Stunting relies on effective coordina-tion among 10 GoI ministries (SoVP, MoF, MoHA, MoH, MoEC, MoSA, BPS, Bappenas, MoV, and Kemenko PMK), which at times is challenging. To strengthen cross-ministerial collabora-tion, LSP is supporting the GoI to implement more formal coor-dination mechanisms (e.g., as part of the INEY PforR Operation). LSP is also working closely with key counterparts and actively monitors their coordination with each other. Further given the ambitious nature of these commitments and targets, LSP rec-ognizes that providing initial implementation support to the GoI will be critical. However, the Facility anticipates that this support will lessen as key counterparts’ capacity and implementation

arrangements are strengthened.

The GoI committed to scaling the ECED Frontline Pilot’s district-based training system, via the NatStrat Stunting, to maximize communities’ access to nutrition-sen-sitive ECED services.

39PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO THREE

Progress Towards EOFO Three: Beneficiaries Receive Improved Basic Service Delivery

06

The GoI recognizes the importance of health and education in reducing poverty

and inequality and, in recent years, has introduced reforms and allocated signif-

icant resources to improve basic services.93 Despite this commitment, the GoI’s

additional resources have not directly translated into more equitable and improved

service delivery for all citizens across Indonesia, particularly in rural and remote

areas.

EOFO 3 supports the GoI to provide more equitable and high-quality basic service

delivery across Indonesia. Under this EOFO, LSP supports government (national

and sub-national) and local actors to design, pilot, and scale initiatives to promote

greater efficiency and performance, and empower communities to utilize services

and to hold service providers accountable. During 2018, the key LSP projects imple-

mented under EOFO 3 include the Generasi Project, the KIAT Guru Pilot, the ECED

Frontline Pilot, and support for the INEY PforR Operation.

ADEQUACY OF PROGRESS AGAINST OUTCOME

On Track A little off track Behind

93 For example, since 2009, the GoI has allocated 20 percent of the national and district government bud-gets for education (as per Law no. 20/2003 on the National Education System).

Posyandu Day in Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara

40 CHAPTER SIX

94 During 2018, 27 activities were tracked under EOFO 3 in the LSP Activity Tracker.95 See Annex 3: Activity Tracker - INEY Support for Quality Services and Behav-ioral Change on p. 76 for further details.96 See https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-rewards-outstanding-teacher-ini-tiatives-chile-indonesia-and-uk and https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2018/10/indonesia-terima-anugerah-hamdan-untuk-peningkatan-kompe-tensi-guru for further details97 Diklat Berjenjang is a MoEC-developed national early childhood teacher training program. The ECED Frontline Pilot builds upon and modifies the Diklat Berenjang program so that it can be delivered locally (at the district level), and managed and funded by the community. 98 For example, a four-year-old child born in one of Indonesia’s richest 20 per-cent of households has a 50 percent chance of being enrolled in ECED ser-vices. Yet, this probability is nearly halved (26 percent) if the child is born in one of Indonesia’s poorest 20 percent of households

Overall, projects and activities supporting EOFO 3 are ‘on

track’ to achieve their intended outcomes. This is evidenced

by multiple notable milestones and achievements under this

EOFO in 2018 (Figure 9), the GoI’s high-level commitment for

these initiatives, and the Facility’s activity tracking data (93

percent of activities tracked under EOFO 3 were either com-

pleted or are on track to be completed as scheduled, while

seven percent were delayed).94 Under EOFO 3, some INEY

activities related to the national and district behavioral change

communication (BCC) strategies were slightly delayed due to

limited national-level guidance and district capacity. Further,

the GoI’s internal finalization processes took longer than first

anticipated.95

CHAPTER 6.1

Outcome 1: Beneficiaries experience increased equity of access to servicesSince 2016, LSP has supported the GoI to maximize the

availability of ECED services across rural Indonesia through

the ECED Frontline Pilot, which enabled over 15,000 ECED

community teachers to access the MoEC-led Diklat Berjen-jang program and training.96 Access and enrolment in ECED

services vary widely across Indonesia with rural areas often

falling below the national average.97 To improve beneficiaries’

access to trained ECED teachers and services in rural Indone-

sia, over 2016 and 2017 LSP assisted MoEC to complete the

ECED Frontline Pilot in 25 rural pilot districts. The pilot’s nov-

el district-based training system helped address supply-side

constraints by empowering local actors (district governments,

communities, and civil society) to deliver ECED professional

development training to 15,491 teachers (of which 98 to 99

percent were women). It is estimated the pilot also benefited

about 170,400 children.98 In 2018, LSP focused on analyzing

results from the pilot, distilling lessons learned and using them

to inform MoEC and MoV’s scaling efforts in 2019 (see below

for further details). In October 2018, the Diklat Berjenjang pro-

gram, which benefited from the LSP-supported ECED Front-

line Pilot, was internationally recognized for its outstanding

performance in improving the effectiveness of ECED teachers

and won the UNESCO-Hamdan bin Rashid Al-Maktoum Prize

for outstanding teacher initiatives (Box 10 on p. 41).

Preliminary results from the three LSP-led ECED Frontline

Pilot evaluations demonstrate that the district-based train-

ing delivery mechanism improves beneficiaries’ access to

professionally trained ECED teachers, improves teacher

competency, and is ‘scalable’. However, the pilot requires

strong stakeholder buy-in, coordination, and supporting

local regulatory frameworks to succeed. Over 2017 and

FIGURE 9

LSP’s Major EOFO 3 Milestones during January to December 2018

• The Generasi Impact Evaluation and project data in-dicate that Generasi improved community utilization of health and education services and sustained the revitalization of village health clinics (Posyandu).

• The GoI and the World Bank finalized the US$ 400 million INEY PforR Operation - which institutionalizes lessons from the Generasi, HDW Pilot and ECED Pilot — to maximize the effectiveness of the GoI’s NatStrat Stunting. LSP supported the early implementation of the NatStrat Stunting via the INEY PforR Operation.

• The HDW Pilot generated significant interest, high-lev-el commitment and initial lessons. LSP is supporting the MoV strenghten the HDW scaling (up to 75,000 HDWs) and village-level stunting convergence in 2019 and be-yond.

• The GoI committed to scaling the ECED Frontline Pilot — which improved access to professionally trained ECED teachers and teacher competency - to maximize communities’ access to nutrition-sensitive ECED services. Initial results from LSP’s pilot evalua-tions are informing the GoI scaling efforts.

• LSP suported MoEC and TNP2K complete the KIAT Guru Pilot and impact evaluation, which helped im-prove teacher presence, teacher service quality, pa-rental efforts and student learning outcomes. Given these results, the GoI committed to scalling the pilot, in 2019, to improve the quality of education services across a greater area.

IMPROVED BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY

41

2018, LSP led three evaluations for the ECED Frontline Pilot,

including: (1) a process evaluation; (2) an evaluation of teacher

competency; and (3) case studies to determine whether the

pilot can be sustained and scaled.100 The process evaluation

found the pilot’s training mechanism is considered to be ‘im-

plementable’ given that the pilot achieved its target for the

number of trained ECED teachers (15,000). The evaluation

identified several contributing factors, including that the pi-

lot’s training mechanism was accessible, affordable, provided

childcare options for participants, and was able to connect dif-

ferent stakeholders at different levels. The pilot also improved

teacher competency, as evidenced by initial results from the

Teacher Competency Evaluation (Batch 1 of 2),101 which found

improvements in six of the seven teaching domains102 and

in 14 of the 20 teacher practices that were measured.103 The

evaluation found that teacher practices and behaviors often

improved when the training materials were clear and simple,

and when trainers provided post-training follow up support

to participants. Finally, findings from three of the five planned

sustainability and scalability case studies found that it is pos-

sible to scale the pilot’s training delivery mechanism. This is

PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO THREE

99 See https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-rewards-outstanding-teacher-initiatives-chile-indonesia-and-uk and https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2018/10/indonesia-terima-anugerah-hamdan-untuk-peningkatan-kompetensi-guru for further details. 100 The process evaluation is complete. However, the evaluation of teacher competency and the case studies are ongoing. See Annex 3. Activity Tracker – Analyt-ics-ECED (p. 83-84) for further details about activity-level progress for each evaluation during 2018. 101 The Teacher Evaluation Competency Evaluation measured changes in teacher competency (teaching domains and practices) using the Measuring Early Learn-ing Environment (MELE) tool. MELE is an international measure, which was designed to measure teacher competency in low and middle-income countries. The evaluation investigated changes in teacher competency using video-recorded MELE-coded classroom observations. The initial results are from Batch 1 –teachers trained in 2016. Data analysis from Batch 2 – teachers trained in 2017 – is ongoing. See Annex 3. Activity Tracker – Analytics-ECED (p. 83-84) for further details.102 The teaching domains: teacher-child interaction, inclusive environment, curriculum, and program, numeracy/mathematics, art activities, and group games and free choice indoor play; all demonstrated improvements. However, the language and literacy domain showed little or no improvement.103 For example, after the training more teachers adopted the desired practice of “scaffolding” (i.e., supporting children’s efforts to solve problems on their own).

BOX 10.

The MoEC’s Diklat Berjenjang Program Received the UNESCO - Hamdan bin Rashid Al-Maktoum PrizeIn March 2018, MoEC’s Diklat Berjenjang program was one of three programs awarded the 2017-2018 UNESCO-Hamdan bin Rashid Al-Maktoum Prize for Outstanding Practice and Performance in Enhancing Effectiveness of Teachers.

The program was awarded the prize for bringing high quality professional development to ECED teachers in some of In-donesia’s poorest and most remote areas. The program was also commended for its ability to create a stimulating learning environment, identify potential ECED teacher trainers, pro-vide step-by-step guidance, and to establish follow-up as-signments and exchanges.

In October 2018, a delegation from MoEC travelled to the UNESCO Headquarters in Paris to accept the prize. The awards ceremony was a part of broader World Teacher’s Day celebrations.99

UNESCO - Hamdan bid Rashid Al-Maktoum awarding ceremony

evidenced by Sukabumi and Gorantalo Districts, which were

able to use Dana Desa to fund the ECED teacher training

mechanism beyond the life of the pilot (see Box 11 on p. 42).

However, not all districts were successful in sustaining the pi-

lot through regular Village Law processes (i.e., using Dana

Desa). Early results suggest that sustainability is only possible

if there is strong local stakeholder buy-in and demand, capa-

ble training providers (e.g., local non-government or civil soci-

ety organizations) in each district, and an enabling local reg-

ulatory framework (e.g., the district issues a Perbup enabling

villages to fund ECED services using Dana Desa). These key

findings, along with other factors, are informing the MoEC’s

scaling design and strategy (see below).

In 2018, the GoI and LSP shared the pilot’s early results

both internationally and in Indonesia to maximize knowl-

edge sharing and uptake. In October 2018, the results were

shared on an international stage at the UNESCO-Hamdan

awards ceremony and exhibition (Box 10). In November 2018,

the evaluations’ initial findings were also presented at a MoEC

workshop, which was attended by MoEC officials, the 25 par-

42

ticipating pilot districts, and DFAT. LSP supported MoEC’s

workshop preparations and coordination, including the identi-

fication of case studies that were presented at the workshop.

After participating in the workshops, districts reported being

more aware of the opportunities available to use Dana Desa

CHAPTER SIX

BOX 11.

Sukabumi District — Sustaining the ECED Pilot’s Training Mechanism in Regular Village Law Processes

Sukabumi District (West Java) — one of 25 districts participating in the LSP-supported ECED Frontline Pilot — provides a good practice example of how the ECED training mechanism can be sustained beyond the life of the pilot. Sukabumi District, which implemented the pilot across all its 22 sub-districts, mobilized strong community demand, and established an enabling reg-ulatory framework, to create an authorizing environment for sub-districts to use Dana Desa to sustain the ECED training mechanism. To date, three sub-districts — Pelabuhan Ratu, Jampang Kulon, and Kadudampit — have used their funds to sustain ECED training activities. Kadudampit Sub-district is a particularly notable example as 90 percent of ECED teachers who participated in advanced ECED training during 2018 were financed using Dana Desa.

The ECED Sustainability and Scalability Evaluation Case Studies identified five critical factors in Sukabumi District that helped build demand and foster a local enabling environment:

1. Teacher buy-in: Teacher interest and buy-in in participat-ing Sukabumi Sub-districts was strong. For example, as an ECED Section Head for the Indonesian Association of ECED Teachers and Educators in Sukabumi explained, “In August 2018, 21 teachers from seven villages attended the Advanced Training [even though] the Village Budget could only afford to send 17 teachers. The four other teachers did not want to be left behind so they paid for themselves.”

2. Mothers as advocates: The success of the program was largely driven by local village mothers (Bunda PAUD) who

advocated for improved ECED teacher training. Since 2017, village Bunda PAUD frequently called for improvements in teachers’ competency and, in some cases, accompanied village heads to advocate for improvements at the sub-dis-trict level.

3. Inter-Villages Cooperation Body (BKAD): In Sukabumi, the BKAD helped drive change by mentoring stakeholders about the ECED process and coordinating the district’s legal support for ECED services. Consequently, the Suka-bumi District Government issued two laws to improve the capacity of ECED teachers: (1) a Bylaw on Early Childhood Education Management; and (2) a District Head Regulation (Perbup) on Village Fund Priority.

4. Intensive communication: Villages, sub-districts, and dis-trict government staff were actively involved in an ECED WhatsApp chat group, which enabled members to access information quickly and improved coordination among lo-cal stakeholders. For example, as one PAUD district patron explained, “When another village holds trainings or other activities… information is shared in the WhatsApp group. Everyone can access information and ideas and it’s easier to coordinate.”

5. Financial incentives: In Sukabumi, all participants in the training received financial incentives (ranging from Rp 75,000 to Rp 200,000) which incentivized participation and helped improve personal welfare.

for training ECED community teachers. LSP is also current-

ly preparing a preliminary report which outlines results and

findings from the initial evaluations, including the complete

process evaluation, the initial teacher competence evaluation

(Batch 1 of 2), and three (of the five) sustainability and scal-

ECED training in Sukabumi District, West Jawa

43PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO THREE

ability case studies. LSP expects to deliver the preliminary report in June 2019, and

a final report, which outlines the findings from all three complete evaluations, in

August 2019.

In support of the GoI’s NatStrat Stunting, in 2018 MoEC and MoV committed to

scaling the ECED Pilot’s district-based training system to increase community ac-

cess to nutrition-sensitive ECED services. As part of the NatStrat Stunting and INEY

PforR (Results Area 2, Strengthening Delivery of National Sector Programs),104 the

GoI will utilize and scale the ECED Frontline Pilot’s district-based training mechanism

to implement a nutrition-sensitive Diklat Berjenjang in Indonesia’s stunting priority

districts. The GoI aims to scale the Diklat Berjenjang program to 100 districts by 2019,

200 districts by 2020, and 300 districts by 2021. In 2018, MoEC and MoV initiated di-

alogue, in which LSP was involved, to develop an agreement to scale the Diklat Ber-

jenjang program using Dana Desa. However, as of the end of 2018, MoEC and MoV

are yet to finalize the joint agreement. Further, a joint MoEC and MoV dissemina-

tion workshop on teacher training using Dana Desa did not proceed as planned.105

Nonetheless, LSP is working to help MoEC identify other channels at the district

and village level to engage the 100 priority stunting districts on opportunities to

scale Diklat Berjenjang using Dana Desa. For example, identified channels include

through the socialization of MoV’s Permendesa on the Priority Use of Village Funds

in 2019, the SoVP-TNP2K’s NatStrat Stunting implementation guidelines, and HDWs.

In 2019, ensuring that MoEC meets its 2019 target for the Diklat Berjenjang program

will be a critical priority for LSP.106

LSP is supporting the GoI to incorporate lessons from the pilot to inform MoEC

and MoV’s scaling efforts in 2019 and beyond. Given that the Diklat Berjenjang

program has the potential to reach tens of thousands of ECED community teachers,

the GoI is enhancing the Diklat Berjenjang training modules — with more content

on nutrition, stunting, and stimulation for children aged zero to six — to maximize

communities’ access to nutrition-sensitive ECED services. The enhanced materials

will help prepare teachers to provide improved support to children attending ECED

services. They will also help ECED teachers provide age-specific stimulation for

children aged zero to two who attend village-based parenting classes with their

parents. Over 2018, LSP supported MoEC to finalize the Diklat Berjenjang teacher

guidelines on providing stimulation (physical, cognitive, and emotional) for children

aged zero to two. Specifically, LSP provided technical assistance and guidance to

MoEC to finalize the guidelines’ design based on findings from the ECED Pilot evalu-

ations (e.g., ensuring guidelines are clear, simple, and image rich). LSP also provided

technical assistance to MoEC (through a team of ECED technical advisors) to incor-

porate international best practices and to finalize the enhanced training modules.107

MoEC formally issued the guidelines and revised modules in December 2018. LSP is

also developing two videos on parenting classes for 1,000 day-household families,

which will accompany the guidelines and enhanced materials, and can be used

more widely by parents and other village cadres.

CHAPTER 6.2

Outcome 2: Beneficiaries increasingly utilize servicesResults from Generasi’s 2018 project monitoring data and 2017 Impact Evaluation

indicate that Generasi improved community utilization of health and education

services. Generasi Project monitoring data from December 2018 shows that the

project was effective, and exceeded its target, in increasing the proportion of:

104 Results Area 2 focus on strengthening the GoI’s delivery of national sector programs that were identified as key to preventing stunting. Key ac-tivities include strengthening implementation of the ECED teacher professional development pro-gram with nutrition-sensitive modules (MoEC), the nutrition-sensitive Non-Cash Government Assis-tance (Bantuan Pemerintah Non Tunai, or BPNT) program (Ministry of Social Affairs or MoSA), and interpersonal communication (IPC) development for districts (MoH). 105 The joint workshop was originally planned for the end of 2018, and aimed to bring together all 100 stunting priority districts, to discuss lessons from the ECED Pilot and implementation guidelines for the scaling of the Diklat Berjejang using Dana Desa. However, it did not proceed as planned due to planning and communication challenges.106 As part of the INEY PforR, MoEC committed to ensuring that, in 2019, 20 percent of villages in the first 100 districts have at least 20 trainers that have completed either the full or refresher ToT us-ing the enhanced Diklat Berjenjang materials; and delivered the Diklat Berjenjang to ECED teachers (using the enhanced materials) in the minimum number of villages. To meet the 2019 target, it is critical that MoEC engages the priority districts to ensure they encourage villages (e.g., through Per-bups) to prioritize stunting interventions (including the ECED teacher training) in village budgets. 107 See Annex 3. Activity Tracker, Analytics-ECED (p. 83-84) for further details .

T H E G o I A I M S T O S C A L E

T H E D I K L A T B E R J E N J A N G

P R O G R A M T O

D I S T R I C T S

B Y 2 0 1 9

D I S T R I C T S

B Y 2 0 2 0

D I S T R I C T S

B Y 2 0 2 1

100

200

300

FIGURE 10

Scaling of Diklat Berjenjang

44 CHAPTER SIX

• Pregnant women who received four prenatal care visits — approximately 98 per-

cent (December 2018) versus 70 percent baseline (December 2012) (exceeding

the 80 percent target);

• Deliveries that were assisted by trained professionals — approximately 98 per-

cent (December 2018) versus 75 percent baseline (December 2012) (exceeding

the 85 percent target);

• Pregnant women participating in monthly pregnancy and nutrition classes (in

three provinces) — approximately 83 percent (December 2018) versus 60 percent

target (no baseline available);

• Parents of zero to two-year olds who participated in parenting and nutrition class-

es (in three provinces) — approximately 64 percent (December 2018) versus 60

percent target (no baseline available); and

• Children enrolling in junior secondary school — approximately 94 percent (De-

cember 2018) versus 65 percent baseline (December 2012) (exceeding the 85

percent target).

Results from the Long-Term Impact Evaluation of the project also confirm the proj-

ect’s impact on health and education service delivery. Although the randomized

control trial did not detect a statistically significant impact on some targeted service

delivery indicators (e.g., pre- and post-natal care, iron supplementation, immuniza-

tion), the average standardized effects (ASE) for the targeted health indicators (10 of

12) were positive and statistically significant whereas the ASE for the targeted edu-

cation indicators (2 of 12) were zero. This is consistent with the tendency for villages

to prioritize health in their allocation of community grants and Dana Desa.

However, the long-term impact evaluation also found that Generasi’s initial im-

pact on stunting, concentrated in Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT) province was not

sustained beyond the 2009 impact evaluation. There are four possible reasons

for this. First, the overall substantial improvements in stunting in NTT that occurred

in both control and treatment areas may have exhausted the ‘low-hanging fruit’ that

Generasi was able to solve in earlier periods. Second, Generasi funding produced

crowd-in/crowd-out effects on other program resources that undercut the efficacy

of the intervention and made it more difficult to detect an effect. Third, implementa-

tion issues associated with the transition to the Village Law and supply-side delays

in the maternal health and parenting classes may have weakened any potentially

positive impact of project design changes introduced in 2014 to focus on behavioral

change. Fourth, Generasi’s effects on stunting were limited because the full suite of

complementary demand- and supply-side interventions needed to address stunting

were not fully implemented.

The qualitative Generasi Impact Evaluation results also highlighted that Gener-

asi supported villages effectively mobilize communities to revitalize and utilize

institutions, such as village health posts (Posyandu). Further, the Generasi Impact

Evaluation found that this was made possible due to Generasi’s performance-based

system, which effectively motivated facilitators to mobilize communities around the

program’s health and education targets. It also found multiple examples of local

government’s adapting Generasi or parts of Generasi in its own programs and ac-

tivities focused on improving community health and education. The Generasi Im-

pact Evaluation results were presented to Bappenas in January 2018 and at the

DFAT-supported Bappenas and Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (JPAL) “Evi-

dence on Stunting from Three Randomized Evaluations in Indonesia” event in May

2018. Drawing on lessons from the Generasi Project, the GoI’s NatStrat Stunting (via

the HDW model) incorporates a strong focus on citizen engagement, community

empowerment, and facilitation (see below and Chapter 4.2 for further details).

Although the PNPM [Generasi] budget has been reduced,

the program is effective for mobilizing

communities to visit Posyandus to weigh their children and

attend parenting or pregnant women’s classes. Thus, the

government needs to revitalize the

Posyandu.

“Conference Evidence on Stunting from Three Randomized Evaluation

in Indonesia,” Kompas, 5 May, 2018.

45

Upon my return from the training, I shared information about stunting with the community, particularly its impacts and how to

overcome it. I spoke to community members, religious leaders, and village leaders. I am grateful that 30 percent of the Village

Fund is now allocated to prevent stunting.HDW training participant from Lombok

PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO THREE

BOX 12.

LSP Supports the GoI to Raise Awareness about, and Build Momentum for, Indonesia’s Multi-sectoral Approach to Preventing Stunting

Since 2017, LSP has leveraged the World Bank’s global

experience and networks to raise awareness about, and

build momentum for, Indonesia’s multi-sectoral platform

for stunting prevention both at home and abroad. Indo-

nesia’s high-level commitment to stunting prevention is

well documented in local media and evidenced by the

Indonesian President Joko Widodo naming stunting as a

national priority in his 2017 Independence Day address;

and by the Indonesian Vice President Jusuf Kalla and

the World Bank President Jim Yong Kim’s visit to observe

stunting prevention activities in Lombok in July 2018.

In July 2018, the Indonesian Vice President and the World

Bank President headed a delegation of senior Indonesian

ministers to Dakung Village (Lombok) to witness the GoI’s

early efforts to accelerate stunting prevention, including

the LSP-supported HDW Pilot. The delegation visited vil-

lage health and ECED facilities to observe how HDWs mo-

bilize villages and connect multi-sectoral service providers

with village-level interventions to address stunting. They

also observed the use of innovative tools (length mats,

stunting diagnostic tools, and village convergence score-

cards), which were tested as part of the HDW Pilot. The

visit received nationwide media coverage and reiterated

the GoI’s high-level and multi-sectoral commitment to pre-

vent stunting.

Internationally, the GoI and the World Bank showcased the

GoI’s stunting prevention efforts at several conferences in

Washington D.C. during 2018. In October 2018, the cross-

unit INEY team (including LSP), together with the Indonesia

Vice President’s Office, presented Indonesia’s multi-sec-

toral and whole-of-government approach to tackling stunt-

ing at Washington’s Global Financing Facility (GFF) growth

monitoring and promotion conference. There was signifi-

cant interest in the program and the presenters were in-

vited back next year to report on progress. In the same

month, the GoI and the cross-unit INEY team also show-

cased the HDW Pilot and lengths mats at a two-day confer-

ence on ‘Rethinking Growth Promotion: New Approaches

for Results in the SDG Era’ in Washington. The Indonesian

delegation discussed growth promotion as a central activ-

ity to improve child health and nutrition with international

nutrition experts and practitioners from around the globe.

The event was sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates

Foundation, the Manoff Group, UNICEF, and the GFF.

World Bank former President Jim Young Kim (third from right) and In-donesia’s Vice President Jusuf Kalla (right) observe the use of length mat in Posyandu.

46

Building on Generasi’s experiences and results, the

LSP-supported HDW Pilot adopted and tested a similar ap-

proach to improve village-level convergence and utilization

of stunting prevention interventions — as part of the NatStrat

Stunting and supported by the INEY PforR Operation. Gen-

erasi’s invaluable lessons — relating to the role of facilitators

in mobilizing communities, performance-oriented community

scorecards, and multi-sectoral coordination — has informed

and shaped LSP’s support for the GoI’s HDW Pilot. As high-

lighted in Chapter 3.2, the HDW Pilot mobilizes HDWs at the

village level and employs an innovative community-based

model to improve the delivery, monitoring, and utilization of

nutrition-related interventions. In 2018, LSP provided techni-

cal assistance to MoV to identify, mobilize, and train HDWs

in priority districts. Specifically, LSP helped develop the HDW

training modules on stunting;108 rollout the training of trainers,

district, and sub-district training, and develop and test proto-

cols, tools, and incentives for HDWs. LSP also helped refine

the training modules in line with feedback and demand (e.g.,

including a greater focus on advocating for stunting interven-

tions in budgets). As of November 2018, MoV has identified,

mobilized, and trained 3,105 HDWs (100 percent of the expect-

ed HDWs) from the 31 stunting priority districts (80 percent

were female and 20 percent male). MoV also trained 2,591

HDWs (or 97 percent of expected HDWs) from 35 non-priori-

ty districts.109 To date, HDWs have conducted social mapping

of “1,000-day households,” adopted the stunting length mats

to raise awareness about stunting, used the Village Conver-

gence Scorecard to monitor village-level nutrition intervention

service delivery, and organized village-level stunting forums

(Rembuk Stunting) to facilitate village support for the NatStrat

Stunting. Early lessons from the pilot suggest that HDWs have

played an important role in converging core services for vul-

nerable households (1,000-day households), and have already

impacted village planning and budgeting (see Chapter 4.3 on

p. 20 for further details).

As part of LSP’s support for the NatStrat Stunting, the Fa-

cility is also supporting the Ministry of Health (MoH) to

develop a comprehensive national campaign and Behav-

ioral Change Communication (BCC) Strategy to raise pub-

lic awareness about stunting prevention and nutrition-re-

lated services. Under the INEY Operation (Results Area 2),

LSP — along with other World Bank units — is supporting

the GoI prepare a national public awareness campaign for

stunting prevention. The campaign will integrate advocacy,

mass media, and interpersonal communication (IPC) and will

target policymakers, regional governments, community lead-

CHAPTER SIX

108 The training focused on the GoI’s NatStrat Stunting, and the role of HDWs and village governments, particularly related to advocating, monitoring, and reporting.109 HDW training in non-priority districts was funded through MoV’s Capacity-Building Grant (DOK) and was not supported by LSP. In 2018, DOK disbursements were delayed, which impacted the delivery of HDW activities (training and incentives). To minimize potential future operational delays, LSP is working with MoV to identify an alternative strategy that doesn’t rely solely on the central government system to finance incentives. For example, a possible option is to establish a funding mechanism through District Funding (DAK) for Stunting or a shared arrangement (Urusan Bersama, or UB). In early 2019, LSP will continue to work on identifying alternative strategies.

BOX 13.

Bringing Together High-Level Government Actors to Tackle Stunting: ‘Aiming High: Indonesia’s Ambition to Reduce Stunting Book’ LaunchIn September 2018, the World Bank published the ‘Aim-ing High: Indonesia’s Ambition to Reduce Stunting’ Book, which takes a close look at what is needed to successful-ly accelerate stunting prevention in Indonesia. The book, which was launched as part of Voyage to Indonesia, com-plements the GoI’s NatStrat Stunting, which aims to benefit 48 million pregnant mothers and children under two years old before 2021. The launch brought together multiple high-level government actors and generated significant attention for the GoI’s national agenda to tackle stunting. Specifically, the Minister of Health, Minster of Bappenas, Minister of Planning, the Deputy of the Vice President’s Office, the Australian Deputy Ambassador, along with 200 other participants attended the event.

The Aiming High book draws on lessons from Indonesia’s earlier anti-stunting programs, other countries’ experienc-es (e.g., Peru and Thailand) and World Bank analyses, in-cluding from LSP. Like the NatStrat Stunting, the book high-lights the need for:

• A ‘convergence approach’ (i.e., multi-sectoral coordi-nated effort) to target priority areas and beneficiaries;

• Credible data information, monitoring and evaluation systems, as well as clear and achievable targets;

• Revamped integrated community health posts (Posyan-du); and

• HDWs to improve access to services that help reduce stunting.

LSP and other World Bank units’ support and analytical in-puts informed the book. For example, LSP’s technical anal-yses and inputs related to estimating stunting reduction projections, were featured within the book.

ers, parents, and the public. In 2018, LSP provided technical

assistance and inputs to MoH to develop the National BCC

Strategy, including about how to deliver IPC activities for nu-

trition specific and sensitive interventions. MoH finalized the

National BCC Strategy in December 2018. LSP also supported

MoH’s preparations to implement the BCC Strategy in the first

100 priority districts. Specifically, LSP provided technical as-

47PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO THREE

sistance to MoH to set up a Task Team

Group, which will be responsible for the

national strategy’s adaption and rollout

in priority districts. In October 2018,

MoH released a Decision Letter on the

Task Team Group’s Coordination to Pre-

vent Stunting, which demonstrates the

ministry’s commitment to implementing

the national strategy. In November, MoH

also held a meeting with the 100 stunt-

ing priority districts — all district heads

attended — to socialize the National

BCC Strategy, and to sensitize districts

to adapt and implement it at the district

level. Going forward, MoH will provide

intensive support for an initial group of

selected district governments (about 30

or 40 districts) to help them adapt the

strategy to their local setting, and to

develop the required local regulations

to enable its implementation. In 2019,

LSP will provide technical assistance to

guide MoH in providing increased sup-

port to these districts.

To help monitor and drive stunting

prevention performance, LSP is also

supporting the GoI to measure and

report on district stunting and nutri-

tion service delivery rates through the

INEY PforR Operation (Results Area 1,

Strengthening National Leadership). By

publishing stunting and service deliv-

ery rates annually, it will help the cen-

tral government hold district leaders to

account for implementing their commit-

ments to accelerate stunting preven-

tion.110 Throughout 2018, LSP provided

technical support to BPS to inform the

SUSENAS 2019 sampling design by in-

tegrating a mini-anthropometric mod-

ule. The new module presents a signif-

icant adjustment in stunting prevention,

as it will help BPS more accurately cap-

ture anthropometry data and stunting

rates across Indonesia, and increase

accountability for stunting prevention.

The new sampling design composition

is more representative of households

with children under the age of five, will not affect the annual poverty calculation,

and is less prone to errors. In December 2018, LSP supported BPS and the National

Institute of Health Research and Development (Badan Penelitian dan Pengemban-

gan Kesehatan Kementrian Kesehatan, or Balitbangkes Kemenkes) (within MoH)

to pilot the SUSENAS anthropometric modules and provided field guidance in two

districts. During the same month, LSP also held a workshop where an LSP-support-

ed consultant provided guidance on calculating and selecting proxy variables, ar-

ticipated in a BPS Balitbangkes (MoH) workshop to agree about the indicators, and

conducted an FDG where BPS and MoH presented the indicators and formula to

related ministries. LSP is currently analyzing the data and results from the pilot. The

results and lessons will inform the 2019 SUSENAS guidelines, which are expected

to be issued in March 2019. In 2019, LSP will also work with other World Bank units

(Health and Nutrition, and Poverty) to support the design and implementation of a

NatStrat Stunting Evaluation Strategy to improve the GoI’s ability to measure and

report on stunting rates. The evaluation strategy will include an annual anthropo-

metric measurement, realistic evaluation design, impact evaluation design, process

evaluations, and other studies. The Stunting Secretariat at the Vice President’s Of-

fice will prepare a Supplementary M&E Manual for the NatStrat Stunting, as well as

an Evaluation Strategy, in early 2019.

CHAPTER 6.3

Outcome 3: Beneficiaries have improved quality of education and health servicesTo improve education service quality in parts of rural Indonesia, LSP supported

MoEC and TNP2K to complete the KIAT Guru Pilot. In 2018, LSP, along with the

USAID Local Service Delivery (LSD) Trust Fund, supported TNP2K and MoEC to

complete the pilot — which empowers communities and ties the payment of TKG

to improve teacher performance — in 203 pilot schools across five disadvantaged

Indonesian districts. Specifically, LSP supported MoEC to issue two legally-bind-

ing regulations to enable the pilot’s ongoing implementation in 2018 (see Chapter

4.1, p.11 for further details). LSP and its implementing partner (Yayasan BaKTI) also

Length mat is an early detection tool to identify stunting on childern under 2 years old

110 For example, it is expected that the annual publication of rates will help the SoVP recognize high-performing districts at the Annual Stunting Summits and increase public and peer-pressure on poor performing districts.

48 CHAPTER SIX

the KIAT Guru Impact Evaluation — conducted by LSP and LSD in collaboration with

the Research in Improving Systems in Education (RISE) and the SMERU Research

Institute — demonstrate similar improvements.115 Analysis from the impact evaluation

highlighted that:

• Community empowerment mechanisms resulted in significant improvements in

parental efforts across all the three intervention groups;

• Teacher presence in classrooms improved most significantly for teachers whose

TKG was paid based on teacher presence (Intervention Group 2);

• Payment of TKG based on teacher presence (Intervention Group 2) also resulted

in the highest learning gains of the intervention groups; and

• Pay-for-Performance mechanisms work best when teacher performance indica-

tors can be measured simply and objectively (e.g., using technology or tools, such

as the KIAT Kamera, which is tamper-proof).

In July 2018, these initial findings were shared with the GoI and other key national

stakeholders in technical workshops. Following these workshops, LSP undertook

further analysis to conduct robustness checks and to identify underlying mecha-

nisms that contributed to the positive impacts. In December 2018, the impact evalua-

tion findings were shared with the GoI in the KIAT Guru Steering Committee meeting.

111 The Pay-for-Performance Mechanism ties pay-ment of TKG to teacher presence or teacher ser-vice quality.112 Community Empowerment Mechanisms provide community representatives with an explicit role to monitor and evaluate teacher service perfor-mance.113 Under the KIAT Guru PPM models, teachers’ TKG payments are paid based upon teacher pres-ence in Treatment Group 1; while teachers’ TKG payments are paid based on teacher service per-formance in Treatment Group 2. Treatment Group 3 is the control group, where teacher payments are not tied to presence or performance.114 This exceeded the target of 2,000 monthly meetings.115 The LSP, SMERU and RISE team completed the endline survey in 270 pilot schools in April 2018. As part of the endline survey, the team gathered data from schools, teachers, students, parents, vil-lage governments, and communities in the target-ed villages. The team also undertook initial data analysis in May 2018.

BOX 14.

Sharing KIAT Guru’s Lessons and Experiences Internationally and Domestically Given that the KIAT Guru Pilot (Phase 1) is concluding in early 2019, in 2018 LSP focused on sharing the pilot’s experiences to generate learning across broader domestic and international audiences.

Domestically, in October 2018 the team presented at the 8th Eastern Indonesia Fo-rum on engaging communities to improve student learning outcomes. About 150 development practitioners from various institutions, universities, and development agencies attended the forum. As part of the presentation, visitors from eastern In-donesian not only heard about the pilot’s mechanisms and outcomes, but also ex-perienced the KIAT Kamera application first-hand. The pilot was also presented at an event organized by the Indonesia Development Forum and the Jakarta Devel-opment Network.

Internationally, the KIAT Guru Team also presented the pilot at the Global Partner-ship for Social Accountability Forum in Washington D.C in November 2018. Approxi-mately 300 representatives from CSOs and donors attended the forum. In the same month, the Director General of Disadvantaged Areas Development in MoV hosted a KIAT Guru dissemination event involving 13 other PDT districts.

In general, the pilot sparked interest and was positively received by the forums’ various domestic and international participants.

KIAT Kamera (Photo: TNP2K - KIAT Guru)

provided technical, implementation, ca-

pacity building, and monitoring support

to national and district partners to aid

the pilot’s implementation and sustain-

ability. By November 2018, all KIAT Guru

Pay-for-Performance111 and Communi-

ty Empowerment Mechanisms (CEM)112

were successfully completed — ex-

ceeding their original targets. For exam-

ple, 92 percent (of 783) teachers, who

were assigned to the pilot’s Pay-for-Per-

formance-Mechanism (PPM) models,113

were paid according to the KIAT Guru

formula — exceeding the target of 85

percent. Meanwhile, all participating

schools conducted monthly meetings

(2,417 monthly meetings in total) to eval-

uate and hold teachers accountable

based on their performance.114

Preliminary impact evaluation results

and monitoring data indicate that the

KIAT Guru Remote Pilot had a positive

impact on teacher presence, teacher

service quality, parental efforts, and

student learning outcomes. Over-

all, Yayasan BaKTI’s monitoring data

demonstrated that teacher presence,

as reported by school user-committees,

improved from 65 percent (August 2016)

to 88 percent (September 2018), ex-

ceeding the target of 85 percent. During

the same period, perceived teacher ser-

vice quality improved from 56 percent

to 90 percent, also exceeding the tar-

get of 85 percent. Initial analysis from

49

LSP will publish a Working Paper on the impact evaluation’s full results, and a policy

brief, in June 2019. These publications will be shared with the GoI and relevant

stakeholders through various workshops nationally and internationally.

To ensure sustainability of the KIAT Guru mechanisms after the discharge of com-

munity facilitators, in April 2018 LSP supported various capacity building ses-

sions for national (MoEC), district (government officials), and local (village cadres

and user committee members) pilot stakeholders. From August 2016 until April

2018, 2,628 village cadre and user committee members (83 percent male and 17

percent female) participated in training focused on continuing to evaluate teachers

independent of the pilot’s facilitation support.116 In addition, as of November 2018,

995 MoEC and district government officials (87 percent male and 13 percent female)

had participated in capacity building sessions, which focused on sustaining imple-

mentation and administration independently of the pilot’s mechanisms.117 Specifi-

cally, as highlighted in Chapter 4.1, these sessions involved developing work plans,

allocating funding and resources, drafting decrees to support pilot implementation,

and administering TKG payments based on the community’s teacher performance

evaluations.

Furthermore, given these positive results, the GoI committed to scaling the KIAT

Guru Pilot to help improve the quality of education services across a greater area.

In November 2018, MoEC requested support to scale the KIAT Guru Pilot (KIAT Guru

Phase 2). Under KIAT Guru Phase 2, LSP, along with the USAID LSD Trust Fund, will

support MoEC, TNP2K, and implementing districts to:

• Continue to work in all original 203 KIAT Guru Pilot schools and support govern-

ment-led scaling to an additional 183 schools in the same five districts;118

• Simplify and digitize the KIAT Guru’s Community Empowerment Mechanism and

Pay-for-Performance Mechanism by upgrading the android-based application

(KIAT App) and Management Information System (MIS); and

• Test the KIAT Guru mechanisms in secondary education, including using TPG in

up to 40 schools in five pilot districts.

As part of KIAT Guru Phase 2, it is expected that LSP and LSD will also provide

technical assistance to the GoI on the government-led scaling and evidence-based

policy recommendations, undertake a survey to identify longer-term impacts and

governance and institutional challenges for scaling, and conduct an impact eval-

uation on KIAT Guru Phase 2’s mechanisms, and the government-led scaling and

implementation. In January 2019, the World Bank will finalize the design of the KIAT

Guru Phase 2, which is expected to commence during the first quarter of 2019.

PROGRESS TOWARDS EOFO THREE

116 From January to April 2018, 598 village cadre and user committee members participated in ca-pacity building training. 117 This exceeds the target of 750 staff.118 Under Phase 2, all 203 original pilot schools will be converted from Intervention Groups 1 and 3 to Intervention Group 2. Intervention Group 2 tied the payment of teachers’ TKG based on teach-er presence. As the KIAT Guru Impact Evaluation found, Intervention Group 2 was most successful in improving teacher presence in classrooms and resulted in the highest learning gains.

F R O M A U G U S T 2 0 1 6

U N T I L A P R I L 2 0 1 8

P A R T I C I P A T E D I N

C A P A C I T Y B U I L D I N G

S E S S I O N S T O E N S U R E

G R E A T E R S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y

V I L L A G E C A D R E

A N D U S E R

C O M M I T T E E M E M B E R S

2,628

83%M A L E

17%F E M A L E

FIGURE 11

KIAT Guru Capacity Building Training

BOX 15.

Strong Local Commitment to Sustain the KIAT Guru Pilot

District and village commitment for the KIAT Guru Rural Pilot is strong and has helped harness national commitment and buy-in. For example, in 2018 the five dis-tricts allocated Rp 3.6 billion (US$ 248,602) and villages Rp 6.3 billion (US$ 435,053) to sustain project implementation.

In addition, in 2018 all five pilot district governments also expressed interest to sus-tain implementation in the 203 pilot schools, and to scale field implementation to 183 additional non-pilot schools in 2019 using their own budget.

Recording teacher’s attendance using KIAT Kamera (Photo: TNP2K – KIAT Guru)

50 CHAPTER SIX

BOX 16.

Remote West Kalimantan Village Running KIAT Guru Program Independently

The tropical downpour only subsided after dusk in Temawang Bulai, but it did not deter villagers to gather at the village hall for the monthly meeting that September evening even though most of them had been working in the field during the day. By 8.30 p.m., about 40 men and women began to discuss imple-menting the KIAT Guru program to improve teachers’ perfor-mance in the remote village of Sepauk Sub-district in Sintang District, West Kalimantan.

“This meeting is facilitated by project cadre and [the School] User Committee [Kelompok Pengguna Layanan or KPL consisting of representatives from parents, com-munity leaders and members]… We invited around 20-30 parents, and usually half of them come every month. It’s been a regular meeting since we ran the program inde-pendently,” said Uti, Acting Principal of Lepat Betung Ele-mentary School.

In Sintang, the pilot has been implemented since July 2016 at 66 schools in 22 very disadvantaged villages. Between Oc-tober 2016 to March 2018, teachers’ attendance at SDN 40 Lepat Betung rose from 71 percent to 75 percent. The illitera-cy rate dropped from 10 cases to 2 cases, while innumeracy decreased from three to zero. At neighboring Lepung Beru-ang Elementary School in Sekubang Village, illiteracy rates dropped from six cases to one, while innumeracy decreased from two to zero. Additionally, more children have the lan-guage ability according to, or even above, their grade level.

The pilot was handed over to village authorities in December 2017, and nearly 10 months on — based on the joint monitoring by TNP2K, Yayasan BaKTI and the World Bank — it is still run-ning well with the backing of central, district, and village-level regulations and funding. Village governments, cadres, KPLs, schools, and the communities have joined hands to improve the quality of education. The KPLs are actively evaluating teachers’ service agreements, and most cadres continue to organize and facilitate the monthly meetings, which shows consistency in the schedule and participant numbers.

Meanwhile, village governments have allocated village bud-get for KIAT Guru’s operation. Temawang Bulai Village Head, Pinsisius Sipa, said his office was happy with the result of the program and that the village administration has allocated Rp 11 million for the program’s operation in 2018.

“This program taught us to create openness and transpar-ency,” Pinsisius said.

Despite the continuation, a joint monitoring team found some issues that might hinder the quality and sustainability of the pro-gram. Administration and budgeting of village funds, archiving and recording, as well as reporting and budget disbursements, need to be improved. Village governments have yet to do an optimal job in monitoring the monthly meetings and reviewing the service agreements between KPLs and teachers. Village governments’ delay in completing annual reports has also pushed back budget disbursements for the KIAT Guru pilot. The District Education Office has been urged to work with schools to ensure better program administration and provide coaching for teachers or principals whose performances are unsatisfactory (based on the KPL’s evaluation).

Simin, Secretary of Ketungau Tengah Sub-district, said sub-dis-tricts must be strengthened to support villages in implementing the program.

“Many people can’t attend the monthly meeting — that’s the challenge. There should be incentive in innovation to drive communities and teachers to manage the program sustainably,” said Simin.

While some issues still need to be resolved, in general the communities are happy with the program.

“There have been changes in the mindset of communities and parents — they are more involved and no longer want to just leave everything up to the schools. The downside of the program is that my children no longer want to help me in the fields. They’d rather study and do school activities,” said Ache, KIAT Guru cadre and farmer in Temawang Bulai, laughing.

Photo: TNP2K - KIAT Guru

51CHAPTER SEVEN

Gender and Social Inclusion

07

International evidence shows that maximizing opportunities for women, girls,

and other vulnerable groups can contribute to national growth and help reduce

poverty at the community and household-level. Further, countries that proactively

and regularly invest in the skills and resources of all members of society are more

likely to prosper than countries that do not.

Indonesia has made significant progress in terms of economic growth and gen-

der equality in recent years. However, education, health, and economic opportu-

nities of women and other vulnerable groups continue to lag. While Indonesia has

strong high-level policy commitment for gender equality and disabilities inclusion,

some laws and regulations reinforce discrimination and traditional gender norms.

Further, prevailing social and cultural norms about women’s family and childcare

responsibilities, childcare constraints, low educational attainment and increasing

religious conservatism are, in some cases, pushing women back into the domestic

sphere (“redomestifikasi”) and eroding previous advancements in women’s eco-

nomic empowerment and labor force participation. In addition, according to the

International Labour Organization (ILO), Indonesian disabled persons continue to

be socially excluded and face discrimination in accessing health, education, and

employment opportunities.119

LSP continues to work to improve gender equality and social inclusion, and spe-

cifically health, education, and economic outcomes for women and other vulner-

able groups. LSP’s approach to gender equality and social inclusion (GESI) is guid-

ed by the World Bank’s Indonesia Country Gender Action Plan (CGAP).120 In line with

the GCAP, LSP also supports two priorities of the GoA’s Gender Strategy, including

enhancing women’s voice in decision-making, leadership, and peace-building, and

promoting women’s economic empowerment. Together, these two strategies pro-

vide LSP with a framework to pursue GESI outcomes across the MDTF. LSP opera-

tionalizes these strategies in three main ways: (1) generating GESI-related research,

analytics, and evidence to inform dialogue with the GoI and future operational sup-

port; (2) supporting projects and activities with an explicit focus on addressing GESI

barriers and inequalities; and (3) strengthening the GoI’s pilots, programs, and poli-

cies to better consider GESI outcomes. In 2018, notable GESI progress include:

119 ILO Jakarta Office. 2017. Inclusion of People with Disabilities in Indonesia. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@asia/@ro-bangkok/@ilo-jakarta/documents/publication/wcms_233427.pdf.120 The CGAP supports Indonesia to reduce high maternal mortality rates; increase low female labor force participation and access to finance; and increase women’s participation in local deci-sion-making processes.

52 CHAPTER SEVEN

1. Generating GESI-related research, analyses, and evi-

dence to inform dialogue with, and support to, the GoI.

• In November 2018, LSP finalized the ‘Mapping Indo-

nesia’s Civil Service’ Report.121 TThe report documents

findings from the joint LSP and Indonesia’s State Civil

Service Agency (Badan Kepegawaian Negara, or BKN)

analysis, which analyzed over four million BKN civil ser-

vice personnel records in terms of various demograph-

ic, education, recruitment, rotation history, and upward

mobility variables. Overall, the analysis highlighted that

since Indonesia’s democratic transition in 1999, the

country’s civil service has become increasingly meri-

tocratic. However, gender disparities and promotional

penalties still exist, with women and religious minorities

less likely to be promoted now than before 1999. Based

on this analysis, LSP formulated policy recommenda-

tions to increase women’s opportunities within the civil

service (including recruitment, leadership, and the use

of incentive-based strategies) (See Box 17, p. 53 for fur-

ther details). Overall, this work helped increase the GoI’s

knowledge about the different gender dimensions and

barriers within Indonesia’s civil service. Going forward,

LSP will focus on building dialogue with BKN about

these findings and recommendations.

• LSP conducted the second Sentinel Villages Quantita-

tive Survey in 2018 (the first survey was conducted in

2016), which documented a statistically significant gap in

women’s attendance and level of participation in village

forums. The draft study also found that even when wom-

en attend these forums, they often do not participate as

actively as their male counterparts. The draft Sentinel

Qualitative Study found that this is often the case as

women tend to be less aware about the relevance of

village meetings and because some women do not feel

sufficiently informed. Going forward, the findings from

the Sentinel Villages Study will be used to inform future

dialogue and actions with the GoI, including via the new

proposed Village Operation (see p.53).

• In 2018, LSP also launched the Stocktaking Review on

Inclusion to further unpack and systematically assess

the way in which the Village Law framework, training,

and accountability of government officials and other de-

velopment programs hinder or promote inclusion. The

draft review found that several factors can hamper par-

ticipation among the poor, including potential exclusion

as a result of village governments, limited capacity, high

opportunity costs, and a tendency to prefer engaging

in informal negotiations rather than in formal delibera-

tive forums. The draft review also recommended that: (1)

the contestability of the policy arena at the village level

should be preserved, and (2) village-level civil society

121 The BKN analysis results were also disseminated at a BKN-led workshop in May 2018.

groups should be re-empowered to establish a com-

petitive policy arena. In 2019, LSP will focus on building

dialogue with relevant counterparts to identify concrete

actions and the most effective channel to take these

actions forward.

2. Supporting projects and activities with an explicit focus

on addressing GESI barriers and inequalities.

• Since 2007, LSP has supported MoV’s Generasi Project,

which aims to address specific gender inequalities re-

lating to pregnant women and new mothers’ access to

basic services, maternal health and infant nutrition, and

women and the poor’s involvement in village planning

and decision-making. As highlighted in Chapter 6.2,

Generasi’s conditional grants and a community empow-

erment approach was effective in improving women’s

access to prenatal health services and nutritional care

for mothers and infants in targeted areas. For example,

the latest Generasi Project monitoring data, which in-

cludes multiple gender-specific indicators, indicates that

Generasi helped increase: the proportion of pregnant

women who received four prenatal care visits (approxi-

mately 98 percent versus 80 percent target), deliveries

that were assisted by trained professionals (approxi-

mately 98 percent versus 85 percent target), pregnant

women participating in monthly pregnancy and nutri-

tion classes (in three provinces only) (approximately

83 percent versus 60 percent target), and parents of

zero to two year olds who participated in parenting and

nutrition classes (in three provinces only) (approximate-

ly 64 percent versus 60 percent target). Furthermore,

Generasi’s citizen engagement tools and mechanisms

to maximize women’s participation led to over 923,000

women (from 5,789 villages in 11 provinces) participating

in village-level (health and education) planning and de-

cision-making processes in 2018.

3. Refining and strengthening the GoI’s programs, pilots

and policies to better consider GESI barriers and out-

comes.

• Based on data from LSP’s draft Sentinel Village Study

and Stocktaking Review on Inclusion, the new proposed

Village Operation will include an explicit focus on clos-

ing the gap between women and men’s engagement

in village meetings. Due to the studies’ draft findings

about women’s limited attendance and active participa-

tion in village forums, the proposed operation intends

to: support the GoI to expand training opportunities

for women on basic Village Law information and core

village development functions, work with village cad-

res to strengthen their capacity to encourage women

to engage in village meetings, and re-institute special

meetings to discuss women-only development needs

before presenting them in village meetings. The oper-

ation also intends to add gender-specific modules to

encourage village governments and councils to better

53GENDER AND SOCIAL INCLUSION

BOX 17.

Analyzing Indonesia’s Civil Service Database to Improve Public Service Delivery and Development Effectiveness An effective civil service is critical for improving public service delivery and overall development effectiveness. Yet, until a recent LSP report, very little was known about Indonesia’s civil service, including the background, function, and diversity of millions of civil servants who deliver frontline services (e.g., teachers, midwives, and health-care workers). To help fill this gap, since 2017 LSP has worked with the GoI’s BKN to analyze the agency’s civil service database, which includes nearly four million civil servants’ records. LSP also mapped Indonesia’s active civil servants to examine per-sonal characteristics, including age, gender, education level (a proxy for skill-level), recruitment, rotation history, and promotions.

Overall, the analysis showed that despite the civil service’s increasing meritocratic trend since Indonesia’s 1999 democratic transition, a promotional penalty and gen-der disparity exists within the Indonesian civil service, with women and religious mi-norities less likely to be promoted. The analysis also highlighted a large variation in civil servants’ educational attainment among the GoI’s departments and ministries. Results from the BKN analysis were documented in LSP’s ‘Mapping Indonesia’s Civil Service’ Report and in an accompanying infographic, which were published in No-vember 2018.124,125 The report addressed two important questions.

1. Are civil servants from historically underrepresented groups, including wom-en, given equal opportunities for advancements and promotion? The analysis showed large gender balance variations across government departments (both national and sub-national). Men tend to dominate management-level positions at all levels of government and particularly at the top levels. Meanwhile, women are about one percent less likely to be promoted in a given year, and the gender pen-alty for women (particularly in the early stages of their career) increased by one percent after 1999.

2. Are highly skilled and knowledgeable workers currently being attracted, recruited and promoted? The analysis found that Indonesia’s civil service recognizes merit and often elevates highly skilled civil servants to leadership positions. Yet, bet-ter-qualified frontline service providers (teachers and medical personnel) tend to be concentrated in wealthier regions. For example, over 67 percent of teachers in Java have a four-year university degree, compared to only 54 percent in Papua and West Papua.

Based on these trends and disparities, LSP recommended GoI action in three policy areas:

1. Increase promotion opportunities for women and increase their overall represen-tation in senior positions.

2. Plan for the upcoming wave of retirements within the civil service by recruiting more women from top universities, and hiring medical and teaching staff only from licensed and accredited institutions; and

3. Distribute skilled civil servants more evenly throughout the country by improving the incentives for highly skilled service providers to rotate into remote regions.

To date, the ‘Mapping Indonesia’s Civil Service’ analysis has informed LSP’s 2017 Policy Brief (Using the Budget to Close the Gender Gap) for the Minister of Finance and the GoI’s Macroeconomic Fiscal Framework. In 2019, LSP will focus on building dialogue with BKN about these findings and recommendations.

122 For example, indicators may include the percent of villages ensuring that women receive training on core village development modules, as well as the inclusion of specific modules on women-spe-cific needs in core training for the village appara-tus and council.123 The World Bank Gender Tag is an internal World Bank tracking mechanism for operations that demonstrate they will address a specific gender gap (as outlined in the World Bank’s Gender Strat-egy) and include a clear and measurable results chain that links analysis, actions, and M&E.124 https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/publication/mapping-indonesias-civil-service.html.125 http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/info-graphic/2018/11/21/mapping-indonesias-civil-ser-vice-2018.

involve women in planning meet-

ings, and to pay greater attention

to gender-focused projects and

activities. It is expected that the

proposed operation will also in-

clude gender-specific indicators

to measure progress in these

areas.122 Given the operation’s

planned scope, these changes

are expected to affect a large

share of Indonesia’s villages over

the project period.

• The INEY PforR Operation sup-

ports gender equality by improv-

ing maternal health and reduc-

ing trade-offs between women’s

household work and their market

roles. Consequently, the opera-

tion was Gender-Tagged by the

World Bank in 2018.123 Lessons

and data from the Generasi Proj-

ect — along with LSP’s support —

informed a gender gap analysis

and action plan for the operation.

Specifically, LSP funds allowed

enhanced district consultations

which considered issues on gen-

der, such as approaches and

constraints to increasing men’s

participation in Posyandu and

ECED, and reaching out to ado-

lescent girls to attend Posyandu.

Consequently, the INEY gender

action plan includes interventions

that target pregnant women, the

NatStrat Stunting’s priority nutri-

tion-sensitive interventions, male

participation in nutrition and par-

ent counselling interventions, and

54 CHAPTER SEVEN

early marriage and adolescent pregnancy. The operation’s results framework

also includes gender-specific indicators to measure progress on addressing

identified gender gaps. To ensure these actions achieve their intended out-

comes going forward, LSP will focus on ensuring that the GoI has the required

resources and capacity to implement the identified interventions and to track

their progress.

• The ECED Frontline Pilot supports recognition of, and support for, children

with special needs. The ECED learning materials, which were used to train

over 15,000 ECED teachers in 2017, incorporated modules for ECED teachers

to recognize children with special needs, adjust learning environments to ad-

dress their needs, and to seek support via referral systems. It is estimated that

these modules were applied by teachers who identified they had children with

special needs in their classes, including 25 percent (73) and 21 percent (60) of

teachers who were interviewed during the Teacher Competence Evaluation

baseline and end line, respectively.126 In Nganjuk (East Java) and Sumbawa

(NTB) Districts, multiple teachers noted that the training module addressing

children with special needs increased their confidence in working with special

needs children.127

126 The ECED pilot project did not collect primary data on the children (including children with special needs) under the care of ECED teachers who par-ticipated in the pilot.127 ECED Sustainability and Scalability Case Studies in Nganjuk, Sumbawa, and Timor Tengah Utara.

We learnt how to treat them [children with

special needs] fairly in the classroom.

ECED Frontline Pilot Participant

ECED learning materials were used to train over 15,000 teachers in 2017

55GENDER AND SOCIAL INCLUSION

• The Village Law PASA assisted the Directorate General of Village Govern-

ment, MoHA, to draft the Permendagri No. 18/2018 on Village Community and

Customary Institutions, which was issued in March 2018. The new permend-

agri is significant as it recognizes village community and customary groups

(e.g., women, youth, and indigenous peoples’ groups), and provides them with

the legal grounds and access to resources (funds) to help strengthen their

capacity to participate in village development (e.g., funds can be spent on

training or other capacity building activities).

In addition to the above, in 2018, LSP strengthened its own Facility-level M&E

Framework to ensure more regular tracking of sex-disaggregated data. While

multiple project results frameworks include gender-specific indicators (e.g., Genera-

si and the INEY PforR Operation), to date the Facility’s tracking of sex-disaggregated

data across all projects and activities has not been consistent. To help improve this,

LSP strengthened its current Activity Tracker tool to ensure projects more regularly

track sex-disaggregated data. The LSP Secretariat continues to work with project

teams (as part of ongoing activity tracking) to ensure this data and information are

captured where possible.

56

Key Challenges and Future Priorities

08

CHAPTER 8.1

Key Challenges, Responses and Lessons Over the past four years, LSP has transitioned from a Facility that primarily support-

ed the GoI-World Bank projects to a Facility that supports the GoI’s larger programs

and systems. As part of this transition, LSP has shifted from implementing projects that

are managed under a single directorate128 to focusing on strengthening the GoI’s own

policies, decentralized institutional arrangements, and capacity building, monitoring,

and accountability systems. This is the main pathway through which LSP is ensuring

the sustainability of the lessons learned from 18 years of large-scale CDD.

This transition presents major opportunities to leverage the GoI’s increased fund-

ing streams dedicated to village development and local service delivery (includ-

ing areas such as stunting prevention). As documented, the GoI has made good

progress in establishing a comprehensive policy framework;129 introducing pilots to

CHAPTER EIGHT

128 A single directorate, which often had its own dedicated project implementation units (PIU), facilitation structures, MIS, and accountability systems.129 For example, including multiple regulations supporting areas of Village Law implementation and local service delivery (including health and education).

Hamlet meeting in Ngada District, East Nusa Tenggara to discuss the priority of village activi-ties using Village Fund

57

130 In comparison, CDD project MIS’ collect information on village participa-tion, inclusion, outputs and outcomes.

test new approaches to strengthen service delivery, and sig-

nificantly increasing the financing available to support village

and local development, with World Bank support in specific

areas (supported by LSP, DFAT and USAID).

At the same time, this transition from a ‘project’ to a ‘govern-

ment systems’ approach presents major challenges. And

while the GoI has made significant progress, much remains

to be done. The GoI’s needs increasingly concern the roll-

out of large-scale system strengthening, capacity reform, and

improved coordination that is focused on results (rather than

inputs only). In the early years of the transition from CDD to the

Village Law, LSP primary focused on providing technical assis-

tance and pilots to help the GoI establish regulations, design

systems, and to improve curriculum and modules for training.

However, LSP’s emphasis is increasingly shifting towards the

rollout and implementation of improved systems and capacity

building approaches, and towards helping the GoI coordinate

inputs from different ministries and levels of government to-

wards common results.

LSP is directly targeting these challenges in its village and

local service delivery interventions:

1. Challenge: Addressing coordination challenges that

accompany a ‘government systems’ approach, and the

more complex institutional arrangements that govern and

manage Village Law implementation, local service deliv-

ery, and stunting prevention. While former CDD programs

were managed by a dedicated project implementation unit

(PIU) in a single directorate, Village Law implementation de-

pends on four ministries, 33 provincial governments, and

434 district governments, along with their deconcentrated

sub-districts. Meanwhile, the success of the NatStrat Stunt-

ing relies on effective coordination among 10 GoI ministries,

along with key actors at the national, provincial, district, and

village levels.

LSP Response: The INEY PforR and the new proposed Vil-

lage Operation place strong emphases on strengthening

coordination and “convergence” around results that re-

quire actions and inputs from multiple ministries and levels

of government. The INEY Operation’s results and disburse-

ments focus on strengthening coordination among 10 GoI

ministries (SoVP, MoF, MoHA, MoH, MoEDC, MoSA, BPS,

Bappenas, MoV and Kemenko PMK) under the NatStrat

Stunting. The new proposed Village Operation strengthens

coordination between Bappenas, MoHA, MoV, and MoF, as

well as with local governments, to improve village capacity

and accountability. Both operations support strengthened,

government-led coordination structures and monitoring

systems. As part of the ECED Pilot’s scaling, LSP also ac-

tively monitors coordination between MoEC and MoV to

ensure that project milestones and targets are met. LSP

also regularly coordinates with other development partners

and donors to reduce duplication, and to maximize the Fa-

cility’s impact (see Annex 2: MDTF Efficiency and Financial

Update on p. 63 for further details).

2. Challenge: Providing clear guidance and effective, de-

mand-driven training and facilitation to local actors

(village governments, local service providers, and com-

munities) about new arrangements, responsibilities, and

accountability mechanisms. Indonesia’s CDD experience

has demonstrated the importance of sustained, frequent,

competent, on-the-ground support — mostly provided via

dedicated project facilitators — to help local actors imple-

ment participatory and inclusive approaches. Introducing

and embedding such approaches within the GoI’s training

and capacity systems which rely heavily on traditional top-

down cascade training and a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach,

requires reforms that will take time.

LSP Response: The World Bank’s platforms on village

development and local service delivery both support the

evaluation, refinement, and rollout of improved, large-scale

capacity support. These are predominately supported via

INEY and the new proposed Village Operation, along with

LSP technical assistance to support responsible ministries

(and local governments) to improve training curricula and

modules, assess capacity needs and demand, and to in-

troduce new methodologies and delivery mechanisms that

improve the effectiveness and reduce the cost of building

local capacity and accountability. For example, LSP assist-

ed the GoI to implement an HDW model and introduce new

tools (via Generasi and the INEY Operation) to build village,

service provider and community capacity to access and

converge stunting-related services.

3. Challenge: Strengthening the collection and use of

monitoring data using its own M&E systems rather than

dedicated project management information systems (MIS).

Downward and upward accountability, oversight, and su-

pervision support depend on collecting reliable data on

spending, outputs and outcomes. Unlike an MIS, data on

village and local service delivery is generated by multiple

systems that are not integrated — in part because each sys-

tem ‘belongs’ to a particular ministry. Although progress is

being made, the GoI’s M&E systems still require significant

investments to improve data reliability, systems integration,

and data sharing, along with reporting back to communi-

ties. In addition, many of these systems still often do not

track indicators on village/local service provider capacity

and governance,130 and tend to focus more on outcomes

and outputs. In the short-term, these issues are difficult for

villages and local service providers to solve.

LSP Response: Strengthening and integrating the GoI’s

M&E systems is a key focus of both operations, as well as

LSP’s accompanying technical assistance. The INEY Op-

eration has a very strong focus on strengthening the col-

KEY LESSONS LEARNED AND FUTURE PRIORITIES

58 CHAPTER EIGHT

lection of data on stunting, alongside data on spending,

outputs, and results of stunting-relation interventions and

programs. For example, LSP (via the Managing-for-Results

Project) helped inform Bappenas and MoF Tagging Guide-

lines for the NatStrat Stunting. The guidelines allow the GoI

to identify and track budget allocated for stunting interven-

tions across the central government, and help bring togeth-

er Bappenas and MoF’s previously separate stunting-relat-

ing planning, budgeting, and evaluation processes. The

new proposed Village Operation also places strong em-

phasis on building more integrated village data systems.

This work builds on LSP’s previous and current support to:

improve village data, standardize classifications on village

spending and outputs, identify overlaps and opportunities

to integrate various systems to collect village data, as well

as the using technology to strengthen data collection and

analysis. KIAT Guru Phase 2 will also incorporate a greater

focus on improving data quality (on teacher presence and

performance) and management.

4. Challenge: Strengthening accountability mechanisms and

incentives for local results. Under former CDD projects, block

grants were tied to village/community compliance with basic

‘rules of the game’, and performance was tracked through

project-based MIS (such as the Generasi Project). However,

now there is limited linkage between the GoI’s transfers and

village or local service provider performance.

LSP Response: LSP’s interventions and pilots — related to

the Village Law, stunting reduction, and teacher allowanc-

es — not only set and monitor results, but also link these

results with performance via rewards and sanctions. For ex-

ample, the INEY Operation supports the GoI to monitor and

reward performance through disbursing funds of various

ministerial and local government actions needed to reduce

stunting. The new proposed Village Operation also focuses

on strengthening systems, and on improving the incentives

for village governments to spend their funds more effective-

ly using participatory and inclusive community approaches.

Finally, the KIAT Guru Pilot focuses on improving teacher ac-

countability by linking payment of remote teacher allowanc-

es to presence and performance in the classroom.

5. Challenge: Generating rigorous, action-oriented analy-

sis, and evaluations to help make practical adjustments

that improve the quality and impact of the GoI’s large

programs. The GoI is increasingly focused on the impact of

its large investments in villages and decentralized service

delivery. However, gaps remain in the GoI’s capacity and

methodologies to assess the impact of the GoI’s programs.

Further, it is difficult to apply a traditional randomized con-

trol trial (RCT) to assess the impact of many of the GoI’s

programs.131

LSP Response: Both INEY and the new proposed Village

Operation support the GoI to strengthen its systems that

measure stunting and village outcomes, as well as the in-

puts and outputs needed. Furthermore, the rural poverty

analytical work under the Village Law PASA will support the

GoI to use its own data (e.g., Potensi Desa or PODES) to

make better assessments of village service delivery, and

to more systematically identify key constraints and oppor-

tunities to improve the quality of village spending across

different parts of Indonesia

6. Challenge: Building a shared understanding, consensus

and ownership to support activity implementation. LSP

works with a range of stakeholders, counterparts and part-

ners with differing priorities, perspective and incentives.

Gaining consensus, building shared understanding, and

working towards a common purpose takes time and re-

quires deliberate steps. For the 2017 LSP Steering Commit-

tee-approved activities including those related to stunting

and LED, it became apparent that enhanced communica-

tion and knowledge sharing were needed with various

stakeholders including donors.

LSP Response: Going forward, LSP is developing a com-

munication and outreach mechanism to ensure that com-

munication between key stakeholders occurs earlier and

more frequently during activity-planning stages, while also

including joint field visits. Field visits accompanying project

Team Leaders would serve as an excellent basis for en-

hanced communication and shared understanding of pro-

gramming challenges, as well as provide a firsthand view

of the development outcomes. In 2019, LSP will prioritize

reprogramming the remaining LED program and will con-

tinue to strengthen its relationships with donors and other

relevant development partners by providing more frequent

updates (e.g. through the LSP Steering Committee and in-

terim update meetings). This will also help to ensure that

evolving stakeholder priorities and expectations are clear

and effectively managed.

Assisting the GoI on large-scale implementation will depend

in part on whether LSP, the World Bank, and other exter-

nal partners can provide adequate support. The new oper-

ations on stunting reduction and village development provide

important entry points to support results-based, large-scale

implementation of these two platforms. However, based on

past experiences, the effectiveness of these operations will

depend on the World Bank’s ability to provide robust technical

assistance, drawing on both Indonesia and global experience,

as the GoI tests and rolls out solutions to the challenges men-

tioned above. As LSP draws to a close, a key risk is whether

the World Bank is adequately resourced and staffed to sup-

port these new operations and to provide the accompanying

technical and analytical support to institutionalize good prac-

tices within the GoI’s systems, building on the long PSF-LSP

partnership.131 Due to the nature and coverage of the GoI’s programs it is difficult to ran-domly designate control and treatment groups to compare performance.

59KEY LESSONS LEARNED AND FUTURE PRIORITIES

The approaching Presidential Elections will bring opportu-

nities within the reform agenda, which LSP will leverage.

The April 2019 Presidential Elections are fast approaching and

have led to some delays in implementing key reforms. Howev-

er, the elections also present an opportunity to contribute to

post-election “reform windows” as the new government sets its

medium-term priorities. In the lead up to the election, LSP will

continue to build the evidence base for technocratic reforms

and improvements that can inform the new government’s pri-

orities and enhance the impact of these large programs.

CHAPTER 8.2

Future Priorities for 2019 LSP will continue to focus on institutionalizing and sustaining

evidence-based, community centered practices and mecha-

nisms in the GoI’s key programs, systems, and structures. The

Facility will also increasingly focus on pursuing key emerging

priorities such as utilizing disruptive technologies, along with

preparing for the MDTF’s transition phase, the upcoming 2019

Indonesia Presidential Elections, and the next administration.

Throughout 2019, key programmatic priorities will include:

• Strengthening LSP support for the GoI’s Village Law via an expanded operational platform.

♦ Informing and finalizing the design of the new proposed

Village Operation and launching initial implementation

(e.g., establishing the governance and implementation

arrangements, and initial procurements).

♦ Launching support to strengthen the GoI’s systems for

village capacity building and monitoring, with a focus on

shifting to new modes of training, capacity building, and

accountability systems that respond to Indonesia’s di-

versity, while using ‘leaner’ methods.

♦ Re-aligning LSP-supported analytics and knowledge

(Village Law PASA) with the new government’s priorities,

and to complement the new proposed Village Opera-

tion’s implementation.

♦ Concluding VIP — reviewing key areas for institutional-

ization and transfer of knowledge, platforms, and inno-

vations into the new proposed Village Operation.

♦ Increasing understanding about the drivers of rural

poverty and economic marginalization, and identifying

opportunities for villages to undergo greater rural eco-

nomic development and poverty reduction impact from

Village Law funds.

• Strengthening support for the GoI’s NatStrat Stunting:

♦ Providing operational, coordination, policy, and techni-

cal support to the GoI (as part of the INEY PforR Op-

eration) to implement its NatStrat Stunting, including fi-

nalizing the Evaluation Strategy and supporting process

evaluations, assisting MoH’s national awareness cam-

paign and districts’ adaption and rollout of the Nation-

al BCC Strategy, and supporting the GoI’s expenditure

analysis, inter-governmental fiscal reforms, data system

improvements, and provincial capacity building support

for districts.

♦ Informing and strengthening the GoI’s HDW scaling (via

the INEY PforR Operation) to incentivize village-level,

multi-sectoral stunting prevention interventions.

• Improving basic service delivery performance for better human development outcomes:

♦ Finalizing and disseminating the KIAT Guru Impact Eval-

uation results and policy recommendations and launch-

ing the proposed KIAT Guru Phase 2.

♦ Finalizing and disseminating the ECED Frontline Pilot’s

evaluations and using the results to inform the GoI’s

national Diklat Berjenjang scaling as part of the Nat-

Strat Stunting and INEY PforR Operation.

♦ Supporting policy and system interventions that enable

village governments to increasingly fund health and ed-

ucation services, in addition to stunting interventions,

using Dana Desa.

• Producing high quality analytical work to inform the GoI’s policies, particularly with regards to village devel-opment, poverty reduction, basic service delivery, and gender equality:

♦ Finalizing, disseminating, and utilizing knowledge and

evidence from the Sentinel Villages Study to inform the

GoI’s policies and regulations, and the new proposed

Village Operation.

♦ Working with Bappenas, MoHA, and MoV to harmonize

and strengthen the GoI’s current village indices and

data collection to measure and report back on village

performance.

♦ Finalizing and disseminating the KIAT Guru and ECED

evaluations to generate evidence on the impact of com-

munity monitoring, performance-based incentives, and

village involvement in local service delivery outcomes.

• Deepening support for testing, refining, and rolling out technology and digital solutions to improve rural service delivery and economic development:

♦ Testing and applying digital applications and tools to

promote more inclusive rural service delivery and eco-

nomic empowerment.

♦ Undertaking analytics on technology, and digital and ru-

ral economic inclusion.

60

Annexes

09

ANNEX 1

LSP Monitoring and Evaluation Approach LSP’s revitalized Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) framework is in place

and functioning. The framework allows LSP to systematically collect, analyze, syn-

thesize, and generate data on LSP progress. It has also strengthened LSP’s ability to

demonstrate accountability, understand challenges and lessons learned, and report

on facility-wide performance to GoI counterparts and DFAT (as the sole remaining

MDTF door). Finally, the framework, combined with LSP’s rigorous project impact and

process evaluations, enables the Facility to generate information about LSP’s contri-

butions to outcomes in selected projects.

In 2018, LSP focused on:

1. Implementing the MEL framework to generate regular performance informa-

tion to inform learning, accountability, and improvements. In 2018, to generate

regular and credible performance data LSP:

• Updated the LSP Activity Tracker and reported back on activity progress to

Task Team Leaders (TTLs) on a quarterly basis.132 The unit’s Practice Manager

and multiple teams across the MDTF commended this initiative and recog-

nized its importance to terms of tracking progress against agreed targets and

deliverables, and improving accountability;

• Held semi-annual consultations with LSP TTLs/Focal Points to discuss key up-

dates and influence. Multiple TTLs/Focal Points noted that this process was

useful to reflect not only on progress, but also challenges and lessons learned

during the reporting period;

• Finalized multiple project impact and process evaluations (Generasi and KIAT

Guru Impact Evaluations, and ECED Pilot process evaluations) to better under-

stand the impact of LSP-supported projects, and to generate learning about

what works and does not work, to inform future GoI scaling and programming

(see below);

• Conducted a Reflections Workshop (January 2018)133 to collect and highlight key

messages for the LSP Annual Report 2017, and to provide an opportunity for

learning and improvements for future program implementation;134

CHAPTER NINE

132 The Activity Tracker is updated by each project team and captures information from project Implementa-tion Status Reports (ISRs), management implementation systems (MIS), and analyses from project outputs and deliverables.133 The first reflections workshop was conducted in January 2018 to support the 2017 LSP Annual Progress Report.134 LSP did not hold a Reflections Workshop for the 2018 Progress Report. Instead, information on key messages, challenges and opportunities for future improvements were collected through TTL and M&E Focal Point interviews. The LSP Secretariat team found that it is easier to collect this information through this mechanism, due to the flexibility of the one-on-one interviews and improved internal M&E processes and systems.

61ANNEXES

• Developed three joint significant policy changes (SPCs)

to better understand LSP’s contributions to key GoI poli-

cy changes;

• Supported M&E Program Logic Training for at least five

M&E Focal Points over 2017 and 2018 to strengthen the

MDTF’s M&E capacity; and

• Circulated monthly programmatic updates to highlight

key program achievements.135

This work was led by the LSP Secretariat (including one

full-time staff member and two consultants). Clear Horizons

also provided ongoing support and quality assurance for

all of LSP’s MEL tools (Activity Tracker), evidence towards

progress (Evidence Matrix), and reporting outputs (Annual

and Semi-Annual Progress Reports and SPCs).136

2. Finalizing evaluations to understand the impact of LSP

supported projects, and to inform the GoI’s scaling and

future programming. In 2018, LSP completed the KIAT

Guru Impact Evaluation to better understand the impact of

the KIAT Guru Pilot on teacher presence, teacher service

performance, and student learning outcomes. The impact

evaluation results indicate that teacher presence in class-

rooms improved most significantly for those whose TKG

was paid based on teacher presence (Intervention Group

2). The results were shared with the GoI in July 2018 and

have informed the design of KIAT Guru Phase 2, where-

by the GoI will work in, and convert, all the original 203

KIAT Guru Pilot schools to Intervention Group 2. Addition-

ally, the GOI will scale the program to an additional 183

schools in the same five districts and test the KIAT Guru

mechanisms in secondary education, including using TPG

in up to 40 schools. LSP will also use the results to formu-

late policy recommendations to inform MoEC’s initiatives to

improve teacher performance through performance-based

incentives and mechanisms, as well as MoV’s initiatives

concerning community participation in monitoring basic

service delivery. It is expected that LSP will deliver the fi-

nal results and policy recommendations in May 2019. LSP

also finalized the initial results from the ECED Frontline Pi-

lot’s three evaluations (process evaluation, evaluation on

teacher competence, and case studies on sustainability

and scalability). Initial results from the evaluations indicate

that the pilot’s district-based training delivery mechanism

is ‘implementable’, improves teacher competency, and is

‘scalable’. However, it requires strong stakeholder buy-in,

coordination, and supporting regulatory frameworks to

succeed. LSP is currently preparing a preliminary report,

which outlines these results and is expected to be final-

ized in January 2019. The final report, which outlines the

findings from all complete evaluations, is expected to be

finalized in March 2019. These evaluations’ results have

informed the GoI’s scaling of the ECED Frontline Pilot as

part of the NatStrat Stunting. For example, to date, results

about teaching materials are informing MoEC’s design of

the Diklat Berenjang. Finally, LSP presented the Generasi

Impact Evaluation results — finalized in 2017 — to Bappe-

nas in January 2018, and at the DFAT-supported Bappenas

and JPAL ‘Evidence on Stunting from Three Randomized

Evaluation in Indonesia’ event in May 2018.

135 Since early 2018, the Influence Log was reframed as Social Development Updates, which is an LSP Secretariat developed monthly email that documents key updates, achievements, and influence. 136 Clear Horizons is an Australian-based firm that specializes in delivering mixed-method program evaluations.

62 CHAPTER NINE

FIGURE 12

LSP’s Theory-of-Change

BROADERGOALS

END OFFACILITYOUTCOMES

PRINCIPLES

INTERMEDIATEOUTCOMES

Enabling citizens, villages, local governments as well as the private sector to identify and implement local solutions to reduce poverty and inequality in Indonesia

Improved pro poor, inclusive, community driven, and impactful local development at village level

L I N E O F C O N T R I B U T I O N

L I N E O F C O N T R I B U T I O N

Local governments become more responsive & inclusive

• Strengthened local framework and system to improve governance and downward accountability to communities

• Communities have more e�ective and structured participation at village-level

• Local governments have development plans and budget that better reflect community needs, including women and poor people

• Strengthened national framework and system for tracking village finances and outputs

• Pilot villages demonstrate finance allocation that is equitable, needs based and pro-poor

• Village communities and government have improved capacity to manage increased finances

• Data-driven planning and budgeting at local level is strengthened

• Beneficiaries experience increased equity of access to services

• Beneficiaries increasingly utilize services

• Beneficiaries have improved quality of education and health services

National & Local Governments better use fiscal resources

Beneficiaries receive improved basic service delivery

Governmentpartnership and

ownership

Communityengagement and

accountability

Evidence-based

Inclusive andbottom-up process

Integrity

1 2 3

IMMEDIATEOUTCOMES

• Communities increasingly involved in village development process (plan, budget, implementation and M&E) including women & poor people

• Good practices, lessons and challenges are shared among villagers

• District & village government are more capable to manage village development process (planning, budgeting, implementation, M&E)

• Villagers have increased awareness of village develop-ment plans and budget

• Villages with quality technical implementation plans

• National government establishes regulation on more pro-poor Dana Desa allocation

• Improved national and district government capacity support for villages to use funds e�ectively (plan, budget, implement, report, oversee)

• Targeted villages have better village fund allocation that meet community’s needs

• Pilot districts and villages increasingly use data for planning, budgeting and M&E

• National & local governments e�ectively disperse special teachers allowances

• Beneficiaries are increasingly satisfied that village plans and investments meet their need and development priorities

• Beneficiaries have improved access to health services in targeted areas

• Beneficiaries are utilizing more health services in targeted areas

• Nutrition services are improved in target areas

• Local governments expand relevant stunting prevention and mitigation programs in targeted areas

• Teachers from rural/remote areas are better trained in target areas

• Beneficiaries have improved access to trained teachers from rual/remote areas

• Teachers attendance and service performance increases in target areas

PROGRAMACTIVITIES

• Managing for Results• Early Childhood Education and

Development• Generasi• KIAT Guru• MELAYANI• Village Law PASA

• Managing for Results• Early Childhood Education and

Development• Generasi• Investing in Nutrition and Early

Years• KIAT Guru• Local Economic Development• MELAYANI• Village Law PASA

• Early Childhood Education and Development

• Generasi• Investing in Nutrition and Early

Years• KIAT Guru

RISKS

Coordination among counterparts and

developmentpartners / programs

Knowledge sharing platform andmechanism

Human resourcingand capacity

Alignment withgovernment

priorities

63ANNEXES

ANNEX 2

MDTF Efficiency and Financial UpdateIMPLEMENTATION EFFICIENCY

Overall, LSP has made appropriate use of the financial, time, and human resources

to maximize outcomes and achievements in 2018. From 1 January to 31 December

2018, the LSP MDTF disbursed US$13.4 million. Meanwhile, from December 2007 to

31 December 2018, the MDTF had cumulatively disbursed US$328.8 million. In terms

of budget expenditures, LSP had an overall burn rate of 93 percent for the 2018 cal-

endar year, which is relatively on-track. LSP follows the World Bank’s financial man-

agement and procurement guidelines for all proposals and activities. As part of these

guidelines, LSP undertakes competitive bidding processes and assesses all financial

proposals, including in terms of value for money (VfM). To maximize DFAT’s visibility of

the LSP MDTF, LSP held a training session at the Australian Embassy concerning the

World Bank client-connection Donor Partner Center (DPC) in June 2018.137

To assess LSP’s efficiency, the Facility tracks all activities’ progress and the extent

to which they are on-track (or not). This information is fed back to Task Team Leaders

(TTLs) on a quarterly basis to inform project decision-making. From January to Decem-

ber 2018, 117 LSP activities were tracked in the LSP Activity Tracker. Ninety-two per-

cent of activities were either completed or are on-track to be completed on time, two

percent were delayed, three percent were dropped, and three percent are still under

preparation. See Figure 13 for a further breakdown of the status of activities by proj-

ect. The main reason activities were either delayed or dropped/aligned (i.e., funding

reallocated) were due to shifting counterpart priorities, challenges with coordination

among counterparts, and limited human resources and capacity of key counterparts.

137 The World Bank client-connection DPC allows donors to access financial and performance in-formation about World Bank trust funds, including LSP, along with other the World Bank programs, including on poverty, education, environment, and governance programs.

FIGURE 13

LSP’s Activity Progress during January and December 2018

TOTAL

VL PASA

VIP

MELAYANI

Managing For Results

KIAT Guru

INEY Policy & Program Support

INEY Behavioural Change

Generasi

ECED

Analytic

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

57%

67%

100%

33%

67%33%

4% 7%89%

40%

57% 43%

60%

33% 58%

35%3% 3%

55% 10%

67% 33%

35%

2%

38% 62%

Completed Dropped On Track DelayedPreparation

8%

64 CHAPTER NINE

The LSP MDTF’s management is led

by the LSP Secretariat. The LSP Sec-

retariat provides a centralized mech-

anism for the MDTF’s management,

monitoring, reporting, communications,

and knowledge management functions.

This structure means that that each proj-

ect does not need its own management

team to fulfil these functions. The Secre-

tariat also allows for more streamlined,

facility-wide management and reporting

processes, which makes it easier for the

MDTF to work with, and communicate,

facility-wide results to counterparts, do-

nors, and other relevant stakeholders.

Leveraging resources:

To ensure that DFAT’s resources are

used effectively, achieve better VfM,

and produce more sustainable out-

comes, LSP leverages resources from

the national and local governments.

For example:

• In May 2018, the GoI and World Bank

(including LSP) finalized the US$400

million INEY PforR Operation, which

provides incentives and tools (in-

cluding performance targets and

disbursement-linked indicators) to

improve the effectiveness and im-

pact of both the GoI’s NatStrategy

Stunting and approximately US$3.6

billion (Rp 51.9 billion) of annual GoI

spending.

• LSP, through the KIAT Guru Pilot,

leveraged the GoI’s TKG mecha-

nism, which annually amounts to

approximately US$110.5 million (Rp

1.6 trillion). From January to Decem-

ber 2018, MoEC contributed US$

207,000 (Rp 3 billion) additional

funds for KIAT Guru coordination and

monitoring activities, and an estimat-

ed US$ 2.3 million (Rp 32.8 billion)

for the TKG of eligible teachers in the

203 KIAT Guru pilot schools across

five districts. The five districts also al-

located an estimated US$248,602 (Rp 3.6 billion), and the villages US$435,053

(Rp 6.3 billion), in total to support KIAT Guru activities including socialization and

training at the district and village level.

• Over 2018, a number of local governments (e.g., Sukabumi and Gorantalo Dis-

tricts) accessed and allocated Dana Desa to support the ECED teacher training

mechanism beyond the life of the LSP-supported ECED Pilot.

Collaboration with other development partners:

LSP also regularly works with, and complements, other development partners

and donors to reduce duplication, and to maximize impact and contributions. For

example, in 2018, LSP worked with:

• MAHKOTA-TNP2K to support the development and early implementation of the

GoI’s NatStrat Stunting. For example, in 2018 LSP funded technical assistance

and consultants who worked closely with MAHKOTA-TNP2K to provide technical

inputs, and to engage and coordinate relevant counterparts to finalize the strat-

egy document.

• KOMPAK to support the GoI’s Village Law agenda, including socializing Permend-

agri No. 20/2018 on VFM, the joint LSP-Bina Pemdes Local Government Assess-

ment, and the Social Inclusion Stocktaking Review. As part of this work, LSP and

KOMPAK regularly met and provided joint inputs. LSP also leveraged access to

KOMPAK’s local networks and partners, and shared findings, analyses, and re-

sources with KOMPAK.

• The Knowledge Sector Initiative (KSI), by contributing to the Bappenas-KSI-DFAT

Indonesia Development Forum in July 2018. Specifically, LSP-supported project

teams (KIAT Guru and MELAYANI) presented at the ‘Addressing Disparities in

Education Quality in Indonesia’ session.

• USAID to support MoEC and TNP2K’s KIAT Guru Pilot, along with the GoI’s Village

Law agenda via the Village Law PASA.

• USAID by presenting early findings from the Stocktaking Review on Inclusion at

the USAID-organized Civil Society Organization (CSO) Forum.

Human resourcing:

In 2017, the LSP MDTF was under-resourced in terms of technical and manage-

ment staff due to general staff turnover and initiated recruitment for five full-time

staff members. All new staff members commenced between March and September

2018. The new recruitments fill gaps within the MDTF staffing structure.

LSP recognizes that, as the MDTF draws to a close, a key risk is whether the World

Bank is adequately resourced to support the new operations and to provide the

accompanying technical and analytical support to institutionalize good practic-

es from the PSF-LSP partnership. Going forward, LSP will actively manage staffing

needs to ensure that the MDTF is well-resourced to manage the trust fund and deliver

its technical program of work until its expected end in June 2020. Where required,

LSP will also engage technical experts to fill knowledge and skills gaps, both across

the Facility’s programs and the Secretariat Structure.

MDTF FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

Pledges and Contributions

As of December 31, 2018, donors have pledged and fully paid US$351 million to the

MDTF.

65ANNEXES

TABLE 2.

Pledges and Contributions from 2008 to 2018

YEAR CUMULATIVE PLEDGE (US$)

CUMULATIVE PAID-IN (US$)

2008 58,624,324 22,952,786

2009 67,391,804 40,758,459

2010 91,192,810 66,405,643

2011 125,279,210 117,980,136

2012 211,601,860 169,577,336

2013 343,203,780 270,775,798

2014 359,605,550 298,071,701

2015 359,605,550 310,171,661

2016141 354,205,520 334,309,354

2017 354,205,520 350,976,945

2018142 351,099,024 351,099,024

141 The Netherlands pledged US$37 million but only contributed US$32 mil-lion before withdrawing from the MDTF142 The MCA-Indonesia pledged US$89 million but only contributed $86 mil-lion before withdrawing from the MD

TABLE 3.

Financial Status Summary (US$)

DESCRIPTION

Contributions Pledged Received

LSP - MDTF (TF070967) 351,099,024 351,099,024

Government of Nether-

lands (exited out of the

MDTF on June 30, 2013)

31,899,970 31,899,970

Government of Australia 203,161,050 203,161,050

Government of Denmark

(exited out of the MDTF

on June 30, 2014)

15,120,164 15,120,164

Government of United

Kingdom (exited out of the

MDTF on June 30, 2013)

7,934,430 7,934,430

European Union (exited

out of the MDTF on June

30, 2014)

6,604,906 6,604,906

Millennium Challenge

Account-Indonesia

86,378,504 86,378,504

Investment Income 3,736,423

Transfer to other funds

(PAMSIMAS)

(10,377,650)

Other receipts 3,595

Total Contributions, In-

vestment Income, Transfer

to other funds and Other

Receipts

351,099,024 344,461,392

Approved Projects Approved Disbursed

Executed by

Government of Indonesia 222,381,615 219,433,896

Non-Governmental Orga-

nization

22,314,103 22,314,103

World Bank 83,604,332 76,373,428

Total Approved Project 328,300,050 318,121,427

Administrative Cost Recovery

Program Management

and Overheads

13,805,573 10,649,164

Admin Fee (1% of Contri-

butions)

3,510,990 3,510,990

Total Administrative Cost

Recovery

17,316,563 14,160,154

Grand Total Approved

Project and Administrative

Cost Recovery

345,616,613 332,281,581

66

Execution

Funds are executed by the GoI, NGOs, and the World Bank. Most funds are executed

by the GoI (68 percent), followed by the World Bank (28 percent), and NGOs (sev-

en percent). Currently, US$ 1,056,497 is not allocated to any specific projects, as the

Steering Committee is yet to approve the use of the funds. This total amount remains

in the LSP Parent Fund.

FIGURE 14.

Share of Funds Contributed to LSP in 2018

Disbursement

As of the end of December 2018, the MDTF had cumulatively disbursed a total of

US$328.8 million.140 In 2018 alone, the MDTF disbursed US$13.4 million.

FIGURE 15.

MDTF Disbursement History

25%

7%

GoI

NGO

WB

140 This amount excludes the administration fee of 1 percent, which was deducted by the World Bank headquarters from the donors’ paid-in contribution. As of December 31, 2018, the total administration fee was US$3,510,990.

68%

CHAPTER NINE

TOTAL DISBURSEMENT (US$ MILLION)

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

1.88.5

36.2

80.5

125.8

181.2

222.2

252.7

286.2315.3

328.8

67

TABLE 4.

Program Expenditures by Executing Agency (US$)

GOVERNMENT OF INDONESIA (GoI)

APPROVED ACTIVITY CLOSING DATE

STATUS GRANT AMOUNT (US$)

DISBURSEMENT 2018 (US$)

CUMULATIVE DISBURSEMENT

AS OF DEC. 31, 2018 (US$)

National Program for Community Em-powerment in Rural Areas Healthy and Bright Generation (Generasi Sehat Cerdas)

31 Dec 18 Closing 121,772,086 2,798,150 118,824,367.80

Settlement Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Project (Rekompak)

31 Dec 13 Closed 399,644.88 - 399,644.88

PNPM Urban III - Disaster Management Support

31 Dec 12 Closed 1,344,208.55 - 1,344,208.55

ID-TF PNPM Generasi (Community CCT) Scale-Up

31 Dec 14 Closed 67,236,713.90 - 67,236,713.90

Cofinancing Grant to PNPM for Decentralized Management of Natural Resources and Renewable Energy

31 Dec 12 Closed 30,682,561.17 - 30,682,561.17

Integrated Management Information System (MIS) for PNPM Mandiri - SIM-PADU (Phase 2) Project

30 Nov 14 Closed 946,380.77 - 946,380.77

PNPM Village Training Program Project 31 Dec 15 Closed 19.50 - 19.50

TOTAL 222,381,614.77 2,798,150 219,433,896.57

Non-Government Organization (NGO)

APPROVED ACTIVITY CLOSING DATE

STATUS GRANT AMOUNT (US$)

DISBURSEMENT 2018 (US$)

CUMULATIVE DISBURSEMENT

AS OF DEC. 31, 2018 (US$)

KIAT Guru Implementation 29 Mar 19 Active 4,987,000 1,682,257.01 4,987,000.00

PNPM - Pro-Poor Planning, Budgeting and Monitoring (P3BM)

30 Jun 15 Closed 1,664,643.49 - 1,664,643.49

Barefoot Engineers Training III Project 31 Dec 14 Closed 3,928,871.05 - 3,928,871.05

PNPM GREEN Awareness Raising Project in Sumatera

30 Jun 13 Closed 265,000 - 265,000.00

ID-TF PNPM Community Facilitator Development Program

31 May 10 Closed 945,000 - 945,000.00

Support Facility for the National Pro-gram for Community Development/Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM), Environmental Pilot Project - 'Green' PNPM

31 Dec 12 Closed 2,295,400 - 2,295,400.00

ID-TF PNPM Peduli Executing Orga-nization: Association for Community Empowerment

31 Dec 13 Closed 2,365,046.79 - 2,365,046.79

PNPM Peduli Executing Organization: Lakpesdam Project

30 Nov 14 Closed 2,028,062.98 - 2,028,062.98

ID-TF PNPM Peduli Executing Organi-zation: Kemitraan

30 Nov 14 Closed 3,835,078.46 - 3,835,078.46

TOTAL 22,314,102.77 1,682,257.01 22,314,102.77

ANNEXES

68

World Bank

APPROVED ACTIVITY CLOSING DATE

STATUS GRANT AMOUNT (US$)

DISBURSEMENT 2018 (US$)

CUMULATIVE DISBURSEMENT

AS OF DEC. 31, 2018 (US$)

ID-TF VIP Supervision and Monitoring 30 Apr 19 Active 9,496,270 641,236.83 9,096,417.71

ID-TF M&E and Special Studies 31 Dec 19 Active 12,841,000 555,312.34 12,517,847.24

ID-TF Generasi Sehat Cerdas (Community CCT) Pilot Program

30 Jun 19 Active 8,435,756.84 760,462.50 8,253,262.20

KIAT Guru Supervision and Monitoring 30 Jun 19 Active 315,000 108,754.79 292,626.30

KIAT Guru - Improving Teacher Perfor-mance and Accountability

31 Dec 19 Active 785,000 34,621.04 781,340.03

Village Law PAAA - Governance Sub-tasks

30 Jun 19 Active 1,700,000 311,260.54 1,232,236.40

Village Law PAAA Program 31 Mar 20 Active 4,550,000 479,269.91 3,776,062.32

Enhancing Technical Skills for Poverty Analysis141

31 Jun 19 Active 300,000 6,135.62 55,905.45

Collaborative District Problem Solving 29 Feb 19 Active 1,000,000 142,111.55 477,807.36

Improving Data to Deliver Results in Service Delivery

31 Dec 19 Active 750,000 144,284.48 207,928.94

Youth & Female Unemployment in Indonesia

31 Dec 19 Active 246,236 20,018.85 160,261.67

ECED Frontline - Evaluation 31 Dec 19 Active 1,800,000 623,724.67 1,155,811.32

ID-TF INEY Policy and Program Support 31 Dec 19 Active 1,500,000 1,189,252.06 1,189,252.06

Managing for Results 29 Feb 20 Active 1,900,000 487,154.80 487,154.8

ID-TF INEY Support for Quality Ser-vices & Behavioral Change

29 Feb 20 Active 500,000 156,026.08 156,026.08

Impact Evaluation of PNPM Generasi 31 May 19 Closing 2,018,194.17 103,760.01 1,932,033.11

M&E and Accountability Tools/Diag-nostics

31 Dec 19 Closing 300,000 75,613.39 163,644.87

ECED Frontline - Training Enhance-ment and Dissemination

30 Jun 18 Closing 1,650,000 3,763.27 1,376,133.22

Development Challenge Nudges & Community-based Nudges

28 Feb 18 Closed 599,373.17 46,530.14 599,373.17

Indonesia Urban Poverty Assessment 31 Dec 19 Closed 900,065.66 501,654.91 900,065.66

Behavioral Interventions for Inequality Reduction143

31 Oct 18 Closed 961,900 506,702.56 506,702.56

Susenas Consumption Experiment 31 Dec 16 Closed 137,458.91 - 137,458.91

ID-TF PNPM Communication Strategy 24 Nov 15 Closed 4,317,811.04 - 4,317,811.04

Village Training Program 31 Dec 15 Closed 393,620.69 - 393,620.69

National Program for Community Em-powerment (PNPM) Field Operations

31 Mar 15 Closed 4,099,916.40 - 4,099,916.40

ID-TF PNPM Supervision and Monitor-ing (Urban)

31 Dec 12 Closed 788,029.66 - 788,029.66

CHAPTER NINE

141 There are five bank executed trust funds that are managed under the Partnership for Knowledge-based Poverty Reduction (PKPR) including (i) Development Challenge Nudges & Community-based nudges; (ii) Enhancing Technical Skills for Poverty Analysis; (iii) Indonesia Urban Poverty Assessment; (iv) Youth and Fe-male Unemployment in Indonesia, (v) Behavioral Interventions for Inequality Reduction. These projects are reported under PKPR.

69ANNEXES

APPROVED ACTIVTY CLOSING DATE

STATUS GRANT AMOUNT (US$)

DISBURSEMENT 2018 (US$)

CUMULATIVE DISBURSEMENT

AS OF DEC. 31, 2018 (US$)

Training of Local Auditor (Inspektorat Kota/Kabupaten) in PNPM Mandiri Perkotaan

31 Oct 11 Closed 288,030.74 - 288,030.74

Barefoot Engineers Training III 31 Dec 14 Closed 68,032.14 - 68,032.14

Technical Assistance and Support to Bappenas and Kemenko Kesra (Pokja Pengendali PNPM Mandiri)

31 Mar 15 Closed 2,987,614.69 - 2,987,614.69

ID-TF PNPM WINDOW 3 PHASE I 31 Aug 11 Closed 166,816.08 - 166,816.08

National Program for Community Em-powerment (PNPM) Window 3 - PNPM Peduli Phase II

31 Dec 15 Closed 1,458,948.24 - 1,458,948.24

PNPM Disabled Persons Organizations Window Program

31 Dec 15 Closed 576,640.40 - 576,640.40

ID-TF Local Government Capacity Development

30 Jun 13 Closed 1,717,025.97 - 1,717,025.97

Delivering Poverty Services to Poor Communities

30 Jun 12 Closed 765,256.51 - 765,256.51

PNPM Mandiri Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) Capacity-Building and Sustain-ability Project

30 Apr 15 Closed 9,926,775.32 - 9,926,775.32

Indonesia Urban Poverty Analysis, Program Review and PNPM-Urban Evaluation

28 Feb 13 Closed 633,374.20 - 633,374.20

Co-financing Grant to PNPM for De-centralized Management of Natural Resources and Renewable Energy

30 Dec 13 Closed 730,399.68 - 730,399.68

PNPM: Poverty Engagement, Knowl-edge and Action

30 Jul 12 Closed 1,999,785.01 - 1,999,785.01

TOTAL 83,604,331.52 6,897,650.34 76,373,428.15

TABLE 4 -NGO (CONTINUED)

70

CH

AP

TE

R N

INE

AN

NE

X 3

LSP

Act

ivity

Tra

cker

As

part

of L

SP’

s M

EL, a

ll pr

ojec

ts’ a

ctiv

ities

are

reg

ular

ly tr

acke

d us

ing

the

LSP

Act

ivity

Tra

cker

tool

. The

bel

ow ta

ble

prov

ides

an

upda

te o

f eac

h pr

ojec

t’s p

rogr

ess

to d

ate.

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

EC

ED

ECED

Supp

ort G

over

nmen

t A

ctio

n Pl

an in

Red

ucin

g St

untin

g: D

eliv

ery

of

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

EC

ED

prof

essi

onal

dev

elop

-m

ent p

rogr

am (D

ikla

t B

erje

njan

g) in

Prio

rity

Dis

trict

s.

Enric

hing

Dik

lat B

erje

n-ja

ng C

urric

ulum

with

m

ater

ials

rela

ted

to

Pare

ntin

g cl

ass

(par

ents

w

ith 0

-2-y

ear-

old

chil-

dren

).

Tech

nica

l A

ssis

tanc

e (T

A) t

o M

in-

istry

of E

duca

tion

and

Cul

ture

(MoE

C) r

egar

ding

en

hanc

ed m

ater

ials

for

pare

ntin

g an

d im

plem

en-

tatio

n su

ppor

t rep

ort.

A M

oEC

team

is d

evel

opin

g an

d en

hanc

ing

the

Dik

lat B

erje

njan

g te

ache

r tra

inin

g m

ater

ials

(10

mod

ules

), w

ith s

tunt

ing

and

nutri

tion

cont

ent,

to s

uppo

rt th

e G

oI’s

N

atSt

rat S

tunt

ing.

LSP

pro

vide

d te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e an

d fu

nded

a te

am o

f EC

ED

tech

nica

l adv

isor

s to

sup

port

MoE

C to

inco

rpor

ate

inte

rnat

iona

l bes

t pra

ctic

es a

nd

expe

rienc

es in

rela

tion

to 1,

00

0-d

ay h

ouse

hold

s w

ithin

the

enha

nced

mat

eria

ls.

Ove

r Aug

ust t

o N

ovem

ber 2

018

, MoE

C o

rgan

ized

a s

erie

s of

tech

nica

l wor

ksho

ps

(at l

east

thre

e) to

pre

sent

the

draf

t mod

ules

and

to c

onsu

lt w

ith o

ther

rele

vant

min

-is

tries

. LSP

faci

litat

ed o

ne o

f the

wor

ksho

ps, a

nd a

ttend

ed a

nd p

rovi

ded

tech

nica

l as

sist

ance

dur

ing

the

othe

r wor

ksho

ps.

LSP

also

sup

porte

d M

oEC

to fi

naliz

e th

eir

guid

elin

es o

n pr

ovid

ing

stim

ulat

ion

(phy

sica

l, co

gniti

ve, a

nd e

mot

iona

l) fo

r chi

ldre

n ag

ed z

ero

to tw

o. M

oEC

com

plet

ed a

nd fo

rmal

ly is

sued

the

mod

ules

revi

sion

and

th

e te

ache

r gui

delin

es o

n st

imul

atio

n fo

r chi

ldre

n ag

ed z

ero

to tw

o in

Dec

embe

r 20

18.

Com

plet

ed

To s

uppo

rt M

oEC

and

B

PS m

easu

re im

prov

e-m

ents

in c

hild

cog

nitiv

e de

velo

pmen

t, in

clud

ing

links

to m

alnu

tritio

n.

1. Re

com

men

datio

ns fo

r sy

stem

dev

elop

men

t;

2. W

orks

hop

with

MoE

C

and

Stat

istic

s In

done

sia

Staff

s to

pre

sent

the

reco

mm

enda

tion.

LSP

partn

ered

with

UN

ICEF

to o

rgan

ize

a Sy

mpo

sium

for E

CED

and

Par

entin

g to

sup

port

MoE

C d

evel

op a

Roa

dmap

for M

easu

ring

Chi

ld O

utco

mes

. Spe

cifi-

cally

, LSP

and

UN

ICEF

sup

porte

d a

sess

ion

on c

hild

dev

elop

men

t mea

sure

men

t in

stru

men

ts, i

nclu

ding

iden

tifyi

ng a

n in

tern

atio

nal s

peak

er, a

nd p

rovi

ded

tech

nica

l as

sist

ance

to p

lan

the

sess

ion.

The

ses

sion

focu

sed

on id

entif

ying

wha

t too

ls a

re

avai

labl

e to

mea

sure

chi

ld d

evel

opm

ent o

utco

mes

, the

des

ign

of a

sur

vey,

and

ho

w d

ata

can

be in

tegr

ated

into

the

MoE

C d

atab

ase

and

linke

d w

ith B

PS s

urve

ys.

The

sym

posi

um w

as h

eld

on 5

-7 D

ecem

ber 2

018

, and

MoE

C, B

PS, d

istri

ct g

ov-

ernm

ent,

UN

ICEF

, DFA

T, W

orld

Ban

k, a

nd in

tern

atio

nal e

xper

ts a

ttend

ed. D

urin

g th

e co

nfer

ence

, an

LSP-

supp

orte

d in

tern

atio

nal e

xper

t sha

red

info

rmat

ion

abou

t in

tern

atio

nal m

easu

rem

ent t

ools

. The

exp

ert a

lso

prov

ided

feed

back

on

the

GoI

’s

mea

sure

men

t too

ls a

nd it

s ro

ll-ou

t pla

n, e

mph

asiz

ing

the

need

for c

aref

ul v

alid

a-tio

n an

d pi

lotin

g of

the

tool

s pr

ior t

o na

tiona

l sca

le u

p.

Com

plet

ed

71

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

GEN

ERA

SI

Gen

eras

iPr

ovis

ion

of th

e na

tiona

l an

d pr

ovin

cial

pro

ject

co

nsul

tant

s an

d te

chni

-ca

l ass

ista

nts.

Tra

inin

g pa

ckag

e fo

r fac

ilita

tors

an

d pr

intin

g-pu

blic

atio

n.

Prin

ting

Mat

eria

l. M

ater

ial p

rinte

d.Th

is a

ctiv

ity in

tend

ed to

sup

port

Gen

eras

i im

plem

enta

tion,

less

ons

lear

ned,

and

co

mm

unity

bes

t pra

ctic

es. H

ow

eve

r, th

is a

ctiv

ity

wa

s d

rop

pe

d a

s th

e b

ud

ge

t w

as

shif

ted

to

pro

vid

e a

dd

itio

na

l bu

dg

et

for

the

Ge

ne

rasi

co

mm

un

ity

gra

nt

(DO

K C

B) co

mp

on

en

t o

f G

en

era

si, g

ive

n t

he

Go

I re

du

ced

th

e D

OK

CO

B. T

his

re

allo

cati

on

en

ab

led

MoV

to

fu

lfill

100

% o

f th

e D

OK

CB

allo

cati

on

.

Dro

pped

Revi

sion

of G

ener

asi

Ope

ratio

n M

anua

l.Fi

nal v

ersi

on o

f the

Gen

-er

asi O

pera

tion

Man

ual.

The

Gen

eras

i Ope

ratio

n M

anua

l aim

s to

sup

port

Gen

eras

i fac

ilita

tors

to im

ple-

men

t Gen

eras

i act

iviti

es in

20

19. M

oV, w

ith L

SP s

uppo

rt, c

ompl

eted

the

man

ual

and

issu

ed it

in F

ebru

ary

2018

.

Com

plet

ed

Con

tract

ed J

anua

ry -

Mar

ch 2

018

: 1.

dist

rict f

acili

tato

rs;

2. d

istri

ct fa

cilit

ator

as

sist

ants

; 3.

sub

-dis

trict

faci

litat

ors;

4.

sub

-dis

trict

ass

ista

nts,

an

d;

5. d

istri

ct o

pera

tors

.

Full

of o

pera

tion/

impl

e-m

enta

tion

of G

ener

asi

2018

to p

repa

re th

e en

d of

the

prog

ram

and

han

d ov

er o

f act

iviti

es.

Dur

ing

the

Janu

ary

to M

arch

20

18 p

erio

d, fa

cilit

ator

s an

d op

erat

ors

wer

e co

n-tra

cted

in a

ll G

ener

asi l

ocat

ions

(i.e

., 66

dis

trict

s an

d 49

9 su

b-di

stric

ts) t

o su

ppor

t G

ener

asi o

pera

tions

, inc

ludi

ng p

lann

ing

and

budg

etin

g fo

r 20

18 a

ctiv

ities

and

the

clos

ing

out o

f pro

gram

act

iviti

es.

From

Jan

uary

to M

arch

20

18, a

ll di

stric

ts a

nd s

ub-d

istri

cts

had

a fa

cilit

ator

and

di

stric

t ope

rato

r to

supp

ort t

he p

rogr

am im

plem

enta

tion.

Of n

ote,

four

dis

trict

s sh

ared

a fa

cilit

ator

(e.g

., M

angg

arai

and

Eas

t Man

ggar

ai D

istri

ct, a

nd M

amuj

u an

d M

amuj

u Te

ngah

Dis

trict

), an

d tw

o di

stric

ts s

hare

d an

ope

rato

r (M

amuj

u an

d M

amu-

ju T

enga

h D

istri

ct).

Com

plet

ed

Con

tract

ed A

pril

- De-

cem

ber 2

018

: 1.

dist

rict f

acili

tato

rs;

2. s

ub-d

istri

ct fa

cilit

ator

s,

and;

3.

dis

trict

ope

rato

rs.

Faci

litat

ors

sele

cted

and

co

ntra

cted

.Fr

om

Ap

ril to

De

cem

be

r 2

018

, Ge

nera

si c

ont

ract

ed

64

dis

tric

t fac

ilita

tors

, 442

su

b-d

istr

ict f

acili

tato

rs (w

itho

ut a

ssis

tant

), an

d 6

5 d

istr

ict o

pe

rato

rs to

sup

po

rt

the

shi

fting

Ge

nera

si fo

cus

in 2

018

(e.g

., in

cre

asin

g fo

cus

on

Hum

an D

eve

lop

-m

ent

Wo

rke

rs o

r H

DW

).

Com

plet

ed

Prov

inci

al c

oord

inat

ion

mee

ting

(Rap

at K

oord

i-na

si P

rovi

nsi).

Prov

inci

al c

oord

inat

ion

mee

ting

cond

ucte

d.Th

e pr

ovin

cial

coo

rdin

atio

n m

eetin

gs w

ere

held

in a

ll 11

Gen

eras

i pro

vinc

es to

so

cial

ize

Gen

eras

i new

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d pr

ogra

m’s

targ

et in

20

18, i

nclu

ding

: (1)

W

est J

ava,

Eas

t Jav

a, N

orth

Sul

awes

i, W

est S

ulaw

esi,

Sout

h Su

mat

era,

and

Wes

t Ka

liman

tan

(26

Febr

uary

- 0

3 M

arch

20

18);

(2) C

entra

l Kal

iman

tan,

NTB

, Gor

onta

lo

and

Mal

uku

(1 - 4

Mar

ch 2

018

); an

d (3

) NTT

(5-8

Mar

ch 2

018

).

Com

plet

ed

Wor

ksho

p on

trai

ning

m

odul

e de

velo

pmen

t. Fi

nal m

odul

es u

se fo

r tra

inin

g:1.

dist

rict f

acili

tato

rs;

2. s

ub-d

istri

ct fa

cilit

ator

s;

3. K

PM/H

DW

.

To fi

naliz

e th

e O

pera

tiona

l Tec

hnic

al G

uide

line

(Pet

unju

k te

knis

ope

rasi

onal

), in

20

18, L

SP h

ired

a Tr

aini

ng S

peci

alis

t to

supp

ort M

oV c

ondu

ct in

form

al m

odul

e pr

epar

atio

n, a

nd to

hol

d di

scus

sion

s. T

he m

odul

es w

ere

final

ized

in B

andu

ng

thro

ugh

a w

orks

hop

with

an

LSP

Trai

ning

Spe

cial

ist o

n 23

- 29

Mar

ch 2

018

.

Com

plet

ed

72

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Gen

eras

iTr

aini

ng o

f tra

iner

s (T

OT)

.48

trai

ners

trai

ned.

In A

pril

2018

, 48

TOT

train

ers

(100

%) f

or th

e di

stric

t Gen

eras

i ref

resh

er tr

aini

ng

wer

e tra

ined

(83%

are

mal

e an

d 17

% a

re fe

mal

e). L

SP s

uppo

rted

the

train

ing

by

supe

rvis

ing,

mon

itorin

g, a

nd e

valu

atin

g th

e tra

inin

g im

plem

enta

tion.

Com

plet

ed

Dis

trict

Gen

eras

i Fa

cilit

ator

s Re

fresh

er

Trai

ning

.

All

Gen

eras

i Fac

ilita

tors

re

ceiv

e re

fresh

er tr

aini

ng.

The

Dis

trict

Gen

eras

i Fac

ilita

tor R

efre

sher

Tra

inin

g w

as d

eliv

ered

to s

uppo

rt

faci

litat

ors

to im

plem

ent t

he n

ew G

ener

asi C

once

pt in

20

18. I

n A

pril

(16-2

1) 20

18,

55 fa

cilit

ator

s w

ere

train

ed (2

4% (3

3) fe

mal

es a

nd 7

6 %

(42)

mal

es).

This

tota

l do

es n

ot in

clud

e di

stric

t fac

ilita

tors

from

NTT

as

they

did

not

atte

nd th

e tra

inin

g.

The

mat

eria

ls w

ill b

e so

cial

ized

in th

e pr

ovin

cial

coo

rdin

atio

n m

eetin

g. L

SP te

am

supp

orte

d th

e tra

inin

g by

sup

ervi

sing

, mon

itorin

g, a

nd e

valu

atin

g th

e tra

inin

g im

plem

enta

tion.

Com

plet

ed

Sub-

dist

rict G

ener

asi

Faci

litat

ors

Refre

sher

Tr

aini

ng.

All

442

Gen

eras

i Sub

-dis

-tri

ct F

acili

tato

rs re

ceiv

e re

fresh

er tr

aini

ng.

The

Sub-

dist

rict G

ener

asi F

acili

tato

r Ref

resh

er tr

aini

ng w

as c

ondu

cted

in A

ugus

t (2

3-27

) 20

18.

In to

tal,

377

(36%

or 1

37 fe

mal

es a

nd 6

4% o

r 240

mal

es) s

ub-d

istri

ct

faci

litat

ors

wer

e tra

ined

(85%

of t

he 4

42 ta

rget

). Th

e ta

rget

was

not

met

as

the

train

ing

was

onl

y co

nduc

ted

in 10

pro

vinc

es. T

rain

ing

was

not

con

duct

ed in

NTB

(5

5 su

b-di

stric

t fac

ilita

tor)

due

to a

nat

ural

dis

aste

r. LS

P te

am s

uppo

rted

the

train

-in

g by

sup

ervi

sing

, mon

itorin

g, a

nd e

valu

atin

g th

e tra

inin

g im

plem

enta

tion.

Com

plet

ed

Nat

iona

l wor

ksho

p co

ordi

natio

n.C

ondu

ct n

atio

nal w

ork-

shop

coo

rdin

atio

n as

pl

anne

d.

The

wor

ksho

p w

as u

nder

take

n to

soc

ializ

e th

e st

rate

gy o

n G

ener

asi c

onve

r-ge

nce

activ

ities

. The

wor

ksho

p, w

hich

was

hos

ted

by M

oV th

roug

h th

e N

atio

nal

Man

agem

ent C

onsu

ltant

(NM

C),

was

hel

d in

Mar

ch 2

018

and

atte

nded

by

prov

in-

cial

con

sulta

nts,

dis

trict

faci

litat

ors,

and

LSP

.

Com

plet

ed

Con

tinue

to s

uppo

rt

Gen

eras

i com

mun

ity

gran

t (D

OK

CB

).

Com

mun

ity c

apac

ity

build

ing/

train

ing

to s

up-

port

stun

ting

redu

ctio

n.

1. G

ener

asi C

omm

unity

G

rant

(DO

K C

B) d

isbu

rsal

to

com

mun

ity;

2. c

omm

unity

repr

esen

-ta

tives

trai

ned.

This

act

ivity

aim

s to

trai

n co

mm

uniti

es, v

illag

es, K

ader

Pem

berd

ayaa

n M

asya

raka

t (K

PM) o

r HD

W a

bout

usi

ng G

ener

asi c

omm

unity

gra

nts

(DO

K C

B) t

o he

lp fa

cilit

ate

plan

ning

pro

cess

es in

vill

ages

. As

of J

uly

2018

, all

66 d

istri

cts

had

sign

ed th

e jo

int

fund

ing

MO

Us.

As

of D

ecem

ber 3

1, 20

18, t

he n

atio

nal g

over

nmen

t had

dis

burs

ed

100

% o

f the

DO

K C

B to

the

499

Gen

eras

i sub

-dis

trict

s. T

he c

omm

unity

gra

nts,

w

hich

wer

e di

sbur

sed

to A

ctiv

ity Im

plem

entin

g U

nits

, wer

e im

med

iate

ly d

istri

b-ut

ed to

ben

efici

arie

s fo

r act

iviti

es s

uch

as fo

r cad

re tr

aini

ng, p

aym

ent o

f cad

re

ince

ntiv

es, a

nd v

illag

e m

eetin

gs o

n st

untin

g. A

s of

Dec

embe

r 31,

sub-

dist

ricts

ha

ve d

isbu

rsed

100

% o

f fun

ds.

The

fund

s w

ere

used

to tr

ain

3,15

0 (2

0%

mal

e an

d 80

% fe

mal

e) o

f 3,10

5 H

DW

s in

the

31 p

riorit

y di

stric

ts; a

nd 4

061

hea

lth c

adre

s on

stu

ntin

g co

nver

genc

e (2

4% m

ale

and

76%

fem

ale)

in 2

684

villa

ges

in th

e 35

no

n-pr

iorit

y di

stric

ts.

Com

plet

ed

73

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Gen

eras

iFa

cilit

ate

conv

erge

nce

activ

ities

and

mon

i-to

r the

app

licat

ion

of

5 pa

ckag

es o

f too

ls

supp

ortin

g st

untin

g re

duct

ion.

Com

mun

ities

mon

itor

targ

et b

enefi

ciar

ies,

get

se

rvic

es, a

nd s

ervi

ce

prov

ider

s de

liver

ser

-vi

ces

usin

g 5

pack

ages

su

ppor

ting

stun

ting

redu

ctio

n.

Ove

r 20

18, L

SP m

onito

red

villa

ges’

con

verg

ence

act

iviti

es, w

hich

are

faci

litat

ed

by th

e H

DW

, in

the

31 p

riorit

y di

stric

ts a

nd 3

,105

(incl

udin

g th

e 17

5 pr

iorit

y vi

llage

s an

d th

e 2,

930

non

-prio

rity

villa

ges)

. As

of 3

1 Dec

embe

r 20

18, 1

00

per

cent

of

the

175

prio

rity

villa

ges

had

cond

ucte

d so

cial

map

ping

, und

erta

ken

scor

ecar

d m

onito

ring,

dev

elop

ed th

e V

illag

e A

ctio

n Pl

an (R

KPD

esa)

, dev

elop

ed th

e vi

llage

bu

dget

(APB

Des

a), a

nd c

ondu

cted

the

Vill

age

Rem

buk

Stun

ting

even

ts.

In th

e 2,

930

non

-prio

rity

villa

ges,

96

perc

ent (

280

3 of

2,9

30) o

f vill

ages

had

con

-du

cted

soc

ial m

appi

ng, 9

7 pe

rcen

t (28

41 o

f 2,9

30) u

nder

took

sco

reca

rd m

onito

r-in

g, 9

1 per

cent

(266

7 of

2,9

30) h

ad d

evel

oped

the

villa

ge a

ctio

n pl

an (R

KPD

esa)

, 80

per

cent

(235

7 of

2,9

30) h

ave

deve

lope

d th

e vi

llage

bud

get (

APB

Des

a), a

nd

100

per

cent

(293

0 o

f 2,9

30) h

ad c

ondu

cted

Vill

age

Rem

buk

Stun

ting

even

ts.

Com

plet

ed

Faci

litat

ors

faci

litat

e pr

oces

s to

han

d ov

er

activ

ities

and

ass

et m

an-

agem

ent a

t the

vill

ages

le

vel.

Han

dove

r of a

ctiv

ities

an

d as

set m

anag

emen

t fin

ishe

d an

d pr

oces

sed.

The

Han

dove

r Gui

delin

e w

ere

deliv

ered

and

soc

ializ

ed to

faci

litat

ors

at th

e pr

ovin

cial

coo

rdin

atio

n m

eetin

gs in

20

18. B

etw

een

Janu

ary

and

Mar

ch 2

018

, all

Gen

eras

i fac

ilita

tors

han

ded

over

act

iviti

es a

nd a

sset

s to

vill

age

gove

rnm

ents

, in

clud

ing

asse

ts s

uch

as in

frast

ruct

ure,

faci

litie

s, a

nd e

quip

men

t tha

t wer

e fu

nded

fro

m th

e G

ener

asi b

lock

gra

nt. G

oing

forw

ard,

the

asse

ts w

ill b

e m

aint

aine

d by

th

e vi

llage

gov

ernm

ent.

Faci

litat

ors

prov

ided

LSP

with

a h

and-

over

doc

umen

t (su

rat s

erah

terim

a ba

rang

) as

a p

roof

that

they

had

impl

emen

ted

the

hand

-ove

r. A

s of

Dec

embe

r 20

18, 1

00

%

of h

and-

over

ass

et d

ocum

ents

wer

e co

mpl

eted

and

sig

ned

by th

e vi

llage

hea

d.

Com

plet

ed

Inte

grat

ion

stra

tegy

(V

illag

e B

udge

t [A

PB-

Des

] and

Dis

trict

Hea

d Re

gula

tion

[Per

bup]

).

1. Pe

rbup

’s th

at s

uppo

rt

heal

th, n

utrit

ion,

and

ed

ucat

ion

are

issu

ed.

2. B

udge

ts fo

r hea

lth a

nd

educ

atio

n in

crea

se.

As

of 3

1 Dec

embe

r 20

18, 3

7 di

stric

t reg

ulat

ions

(21 i

n 20

18 a

nd 16

prio

r to

2018

) on

“prio

ritiz

ing

heal

th a

nd e

duca

tion

usin

g vi

llage

fund

” w

ere

issu

ed in

24

Gen

eras

i di

stric

ts. T

he re

gula

tions

pro

vide

vill

age

gove

rnm

ents

with

a le

gal r

efer

ence

to

budg

et a

nd im

plem

ent b

asic

soc

ial s

ervi

ces

(hea

lth a

nd e

duca

tion)

usi

ng th

e V

illag

e Fu

nd.

Com

plet

ed

Supp

ort M

oV o

n de

-ve

lopi

ng th

e re

vise

d tra

inin

g m

odul

e fo

r G

ener

asi’s

ext

ensi

on in

20

18.

TA to

fina

lize

mod

ules

fo

r tra

inin

g:1.

dist

rict f

acili

tato

rs;

2. s

ub-d

istri

ct fa

cilit

ator

s;3.

HD

Ws.

Fina

l mod

ule

for t

rain

ing

of G

ener

asi’s

con

cept

an

d de

sign

in 2

018

.

In M

arch

20

18, t

he tr

aini

ng m

odul

es fo

r dis

trict

faci

litat

ors,

sub

-dis

trict

faci

litat

ors,

an

d H

DW

s w

ere

deve

lope

d an

d fin

aliz

ed w

ith L

SP s

uppo

rt. S

peci

fical

ly, L

SP

supp

orte

d a

Trai

ning

Spe

cial

ist C

onsu

ltant

who

revi

ewed

and

pro

vide

d te

chni

cal

inpu

ts to

fina

lize

the

train

ing

mod

ules

.

Com

plet

ed

Del

iver

y of

fina

l mod

ules

to

trai

ners

for t

rain

ing.

All

48 tr

aine

rs a

re

train

ed.

LSP

supp

orte

d th

e tra

inin

g-fo

r-tra

iner

s to

trai

n th

e H

DW

s. T

he tr

aini

ng w

as d

eliv

-er

ed in

Apr

il 20

18, a

nd 4

8 tra

iner

s w

ere

train

ed (8

3% m

ale

and

17%

fem

ale)

. C

ompl

eted

74

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Gen

eras

iPi

lotin

g H

DW

/KPM

(H

uman

Dev

elop

men

t C

adre

s) a

s G

ener

asi

Con

cept

20

18.

Prin

ting

Leng

th M

at.

100

0 p

acka

ges

Leng

th

Mat

h.

The

leng

th m

at p

acka

ges

(incl

udin

g le

ngth

mat

s an

d cu

e ca

rds

[edu

catio

n m

ate-

rials

]) ar

e us

ed to

mea

sure

hei

ght o

f bab

y/in

fant

in h

ealth

faci

litie

s, a

nd a

s a

tool

to

det

ect s

tunt

ing.

The

leng

th m

at p

acka

ges

wer

e ap

prov

ed b

y th

e M

inis

try o

f H

ealth

, and

soc

ializ

ed w

ith M

oV. L

SP s

uppo

rted

the

prin

ting

for 1

,00

0 p

acka

ges.

Th

e pa

ckag

es w

ere

dist

ribut

ed in

mul

tiple

bat

ches

: 38

1 pac

kage

s w

ere

dist

ribut

-ed

to 14

prio

rity

dist

ricts

in A

pril

2018

(Bat

ch 1)

; 344

pac

kage

s w

ere

dist

ribut

ed to

th

e re

mai

ning

17 p

riorit

y di

stric

ts (B

atch

2);

60 p

acka

ges

wer

e di

strib

uted

to M

oV-

NM

C; a

nd 2

15 p

acka

ges

for t

he W

orld

Ban

k.

Com

plet

ed

Prin

ting

HD

W/K

PM

Han

d B

ook.

Mat

eria

l prin

ted.

In M

ay 2

018

, LSP

prin

ted

and

dist

ribut

ed 2

50 H

DW

han

dboo

ks d

urin

g B

atch

2 o

f th

e H

DW

Tra

inin

g. T

he h

andb

ook

acts

as

a tu

toria

l boo

k fo

r HD

Ws

and

incl

udes

in

form

atio

n ab

out t

he H

DW

pro

gram

ope

ratio

ns, i

nclu

ding

how

to fa

cilit

ate,

adv

ise

on v

illag

e pl

an d

evel

opm

ent,

use

of th

e le

ngth

mat

, and

mon

itor t

he in

dica

tors

, et

c.

Com

plet

ed

Trai

ning

HD

W B

atch

1.30

HD

Ws,

15 S

ub-d

is-

trict

s Fa

cilit

ator

s Tr

aine

d.In

Jan

uary

20

18, 2

0 s

ub-d

istri

ct fa

cilit

ator

s fro

m 5

dis

trict

s (6

5% M

ale,

35%

fem

ale)

, an

d 30

HD

Ws

(17%

mal

e, 8

3% fe

mal

e) fr

om 5

dis

trict

s, w

ere

train

ed (1

7-21

Jan

). Th

e di

stric

ts in

clud

ed N

TB, W

est J

ava,

Gor

onta

lo, W

est K

alim

anta

n an

d M

aluk

u.

Com

plet

ed

Trai

ning

HD

W B

atch

2.

Trai

n 14

5 H

DW

s.O

ver A

pril

and

May

20

18, 1

45 H

DW

s (2

1% m

ale,

79%

fem

ale)

from

7 d

istri

cts

wer

e tra

ined

(in

NTB

, Wes

t Jav

a, G

oron

talo

, Sou

th S

ulaw

esi,

NTT

, Wes

t Sul

awes

i, Ea

st

Java

) in

Apr

il-M

ay 2

018

. Dur

ing

this

trai

ning

, Gen

eras

i als

o tra

ined

58

Vill

age

faci

litat

ors

(91%

mal

e, 9

% fe

mal

e) fr

om s

tunt

ing

dist

rict a

reas

, but

not

in G

ener

asi

loca

tions

.

Com

plet

ed

HD

W T

rain

ing

in C

ianj

ur

Dis

trict

for 7

6 G

ener

asi

villa

ges

outs

ide

Gov

-er

nmen

t vill

ages

prio

rity

loca

tion.

1. Tr

aini

ng H

DW

in C

ianj

ur2.

Rem

buk

Stun

ting

Keca

mat

an3.

Vid

eo C

aptu

red.

In C

ianj

ur D

istri

ct, 8

2 vi

llage

s re

ceiv

ed s

uppo

rt fro

m G

ener

asi a

nd s

ix o

f tho

se

villa

ges

are

clas

sifie

d as

one

of t

he G

oI's

1,0

00

stu

ntin

g pr

iorit

y vi

llage

s. T

hese

si

x vi

llage

s re

ceiv

ed H

DW

trai

ning

in S

epte

mbe

r 20

18. G

ener

asi a

lso

cond

ucte

d tra

inin

g fo

r the

rem

aini

ng 7

6 vi

llage

s (w

hich

are

not

incl

uded

in th

e G

oI's

1,0

00

pr

iorit

y vi

llage

s) in

Aug

ust 2

018

, and

will

com

men

ce im

plem

entin

g th

e st

untin

g pr

even

tion

conv

erge

nce

conc

ept.

This

act

ivity

will

act

as

a m

odel

to im

plem

ent

train

ing

in v

illag

es th

at a

re n

ot in

clud

ed w

ithin

the

GoI

's s

tunt

ing

prio

rity

villa

ges,

bu

t with

in G

ener

asi l

ocat

ions

. In

thes

e vi

llage

s, a

ctiv

ities

will

be

fund

ed b

y th

e D

OK

CB

(Gen

eras

i com

mun

ity g

rant

).

The

Sub-

dist

rict R

embu

k St

untin

g w

as c

ondu

cted

on

Aug

ust 3

0, 2

018

in S

ukar

e-sm

i Sub

-Dis

trict

, Cia

njur

. The

less

ons

lear

ned

from

the

activ

ity w

ere

capt

ured

th

roug

h a

vide

o, w

hich

can

be

acce

ssed

via

You

Tube

http

s://w

ww

.you

tube

.com

/w

atch

?v=B

TafK

7eJB

jc

Com

plet

ed

75

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Gen

eras

iC

ondu

ct re

gula

r Im

-pl

emen

tatio

n Su

ppor

t M

issi

on (I

SM) P

art 1

.

Impl

emen

tatio

n Su

ppor

t M

issi

ons.

1. Is

sues

iden

tified

; 2.

Rec

omm

enda

tions

m

ade.

An

impl

emen

tatio

n su

perv

isio

n m

issi

on w

as u

nder

take

n in

May

20

18 to

obs

erve

an

d as

sess

the

achi

evem

ent o

f Gen

eras

i's d

evel

opm

ent o

bjec

tive;

HD

W tr

aini

ng,

impl

emen

tatio

n pr

ogre

ss, a

nd c

omm

unic

atio

n to

ols;

coo

rdin

atio

n w

ith p

rogr

am-

mat

ic D

AK

Pilo

t; an

d ov

eral

l pro

gram

man

agem

ent.

Com

plet

ed

1. A

ide

Mem

oire

Doc

u-m

ent;

2. Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta-

tus

Repo

rt.

1. A

ide

Mem

oire

Doc

u-m

ent;

2. Im

plem

enta

tion

Stat

us

Repo

rt.

LSP

sum

mar

ized

the

findi

ngs

from

the

May

20

18 m

issi

on, a

long

with

reco

mm

en-

datio

ns to

MoV

, in

the

aide

mem

oire

and

impl

emen

tatio

n st

atus

repo

rt (IS

R).

The

ISR

was

fina

lized

in J

une

2018

.

Com

plet

ed

Con

duct

regu

lar I

m-

plem

enta

tion

Supp

ort

Mis

sion

(ISM

) Par

t 2.

Impl

emen

tatio

n Su

ppor

t M

issi

ons.

1. A

ide

Mem

oire

Doc

u-m

ent;

2. Im

plem

enta

tion

Stat

us

Repo

rt.

An

impl

emen

tatio

n su

perv

isio

n m

issi

on w

as c

ondu

cted

in O

ctob

er 2

018

to a

sses

s G

ener

asi's

pro

gram

inte

grat

ion

with

Vill

age

Law

; pro

gram

man

agem

ent a

nd o

p-er

atio

nal i

ssue

s; a

nd s

uppo

rt fo

r the

Nat

Stra

t Stu

ntin

g an

d H

DW

Pilo

t. Th

e m

issi

on

visi

ted

thre

e pr

ovin

ces:

Sou

th S

umat

ra (M

usi B

anyu

asin

, OK

I), W

est J

ava

(Cia

njur

), an

d Ea

st ja

va (T

reng

gale

k).

Com

plet

ed

1. A

ide

Mem

oire

Doc

u-m

ent;

2. Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta-

tus

Repo

rt.

1. Is

sues

iden

tified

; 2.

Rec

omm

enda

tions

m

ade.

LSP

com

plet

ed th

e m

issi

on's

aid

e m

emoi

re a

nd IS

R in

Dec

embe

r 20

18.

Com

plet

ed

Adv

ice

and

mon

itorin

g of

pro

gres

s da

ta c

olle

ct-

ing;

del

iver

y of

tool

s/m

onito

ring

book

.

1. D

ata

mon

itore

d;

2. H

DW

mon

itorin

g bo

ok,

form

for d

ata

colle

ctio

n,

and

scor

e ca

rd;

3. A

pplic

atio

n sy

stem

for

HD

W.

LSP

prov

ided

tech

nica

l adv

ice

abou

t dat

a co

llect

ion

and

proc

essi

ng a

s pa

rt of

th

e H

DW

Pilo

t (e.

g., c

onve

rgen

ce s

core

car

d fo

r stu

ntin

g, A

PBD

es tr

acki

ng).

The

draf

t HD

W m

onito

ring

book

and

sco

re c

ard

form

was

fina

lized

and

del

iver

ed to

N

MC

(Nat

iona

l Man

agem

ent C

onsu

ltant

). A

pro

toty

pe fo

r an

appl

icat

ion

syst

em fo

r H

DW

dat

a co

llect

ion

was

als

o de

velo

ped,

and

can

be

acce

ssed

onl

ine

(http

://si

m-

stun

ting.

info

/sim

onpa

la/).

As

of N

ovem

ber 2

2, 2

018

: 1,6

03

villa

ges

have

repo

rted

thei

r con

verg

ence

dat

a in

the

MIS

sys

tem

. Goi

ng fo

rwar

d, L

SP w

ill m

odify

the

indi

-ca

tors

of t

he 5

stu

ntin

g pa

ckag

es to

mak

e it

easi

er fo

r HD

Ws

to fi

ll in

and

mon

itor

stun

ting

prog

ress

. Thi

s ac

tivity

is e

xpec

ted

to b

e co

mpl

eted

in e

arly

20

19.

On

Trac

k

Impl

emen

tatio

n C

om-

plet

ion

Repo

rt (IC

R).

Fina

l IC

R d

ocum

ent.

LSP

has

cont

ract

ed a

con

sulta

nt w

ho is

cur

rent

ly d

rafti

ng th

e IC

R re

port.

LSP

un

derto

ok a

mis

sion

for t

his

activ

ity in

par

alle

l with

the

Gen

eras

i im

plem

enta

tion

supe

rvis

ion

mis

sion

in O

ctob

er 2

018

. The

ICR

is e

xpec

ted

to b

e fin

aliz

ed in

Feb

-ru

ary

2019

.

On

Trac

k

76

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

INEY

Sup

port

for

Qua

lity

Ser

vice

s an

d B

ehav

iora

l Cha

nge

INEY

Sup

port

fo

r Qua

lity

Serv

ices

and

B

ehav

iora

l C

hang

e

Loca

l del

iver

y of

nut

ri-tio

n se

rvic

es a

nd b

ehav

-io

ral c

hang

e su

ppor

t.

1. N

utrit

ion

Inte

rven

tion

impl

emen

tatio

n de

sign

an

d ca

paci

ty.

Nat

iona

l BC

C S

trate

gy

deve

lope

d.LS

P pr

ovid

ed te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e to

sup

port

MoH

to d

evel

op th

e N

atio

nal B

CC

st

rate

gy (I

PC a

ctiv

ities

) for

the

first

100

prio

rity

dist

ricts

, as

wel

l as

plan

ning

to in

sert

stun

ting

redu

ctio

n po

licy

in th

e ex

istin

g re

gula

tion

(e.g

., G

erm

as).

Wh

ile, L

SP

pro

vid

-e

d t

ech

nic

al i

np

uts

an

d t

he

Na

tio

na

l BC

C S

tra

teg

y w

as

de

velo

pe

d in

De

cem

be

r 2

018

, th

is a

ctiv

ity

is s

ligh

tly

de

laye

d a

s M

oH

’s in

tern

al r

evi

ew

/fin

aliz

ati

on

pro

cess

to

ok lo

ng

er

tha

n fi

rst

an

tici

pa

ted

. Cur

rent

ly, t

he d

raft

is s

till b

eing

revi

ewed

by

MoH

and

exp

ecte

d to

be

com

plet

ed in

ear

ly 2

019

.

LSP

prov

ided

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

for t

he G

oI’s

“Aim

ing

Hig

h: In

done

sia’

s A

mbi

-tio

n to

Red

uce

Stun

ting”

boo

k. T

he b

ook

aim

s to

sup

port

and

advo

cate

the

GoI

on

stu

ntin

g re

duct

ion

and

was

laun

ched

on

19 S

epte

mbe

r 20

18. S

peci

fical

ly, L

SP

prov

ided

ana

lytic

al in

puts

to in

form

the

book

, inc

ludi

ng o

n es

timat

ing

the

proj

ec-

tion

of s

tunt

ing

redu

ctio

n.

Del

ayed

2. B

ehav

ior

chan

ge

com

mun

icat

ion.

Prio

rity

Dis

trict

BC

C s

trat-

egie

s de

velo

ped

(Tar

get

2018

: 80

dis

trict

s

Prio

rity

Dis

trict

s Im

-pl

emen

tatio

n of

loca

l-ly

-ada

pted

inte

rper

sona

l co

mm

unic

atio

n (IP

C)

activ

ities

(Tar

get 2

018

: 80

di

stric

ts).

LSP

prov

ided

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

to M

oH in

hel

p se

t up

a ta

sk g

roup

that

is

resp

onsi

ble

for t

he N

atio

nal B

CC

Stra

tegy

dev

elop

men

t and

roll

out/a

dapt

ion

in

dist

ricts

. In

Nov

embe

r 20

18, M

oH h

eld

a m

eetin

g w

ith th

e 10

0 s

tunt

ing

prio

rity

dist

ricts

(all

dist

rict h

eads

atte

nded

) to

soci

aliz

e th

e N

atio

nal B

CC

Stra

tegy

and

se

nsiti

ze d

istri

cts

abou

t ada

ptin

g an

d de

velo

ping

loca

l reg

ulat

ions

(in

line

with

the

Nat

iona

l BC

C S

trate

gy).

Goi

ng fo

rwar

d, th

e M

oH w

ill p

rovi

de in

tens

ive

supp

ort f

or

30 to

40

dis

trict

s to

hel

p di

stric

t gov

ernm

ents

ada

pt th

e st

rate

gy a

t the

loca

l lev

el

and

deve

lop

requ

ired

loca

l reg

ulat

ions

.

Th

is a

ctiv

ity

wa

s d

ela

yed

as

the

tim

elin

e t

o d

eve

lop

th

e lo

cal s

tra

teg

y a

t th

e

dis

tric

t le

vel t

oo

k lo

ng

er

tha

n fi

rst

an

tici

pa

ted

(e

.g. a

dd

itio

na

l ste

ps

we

re

req

uir

ed

to

de

velo

p t

he

dis

tric

t st

rate

gie

s a

nd

re

lea

se t

he

loca

l re

gu

lati

on

s).

Dis

tric

t ca

pa

city

an

d t

he

leve

l of

gu

ida

nce

pro

vid

ed

by

na

tio

na

l le

vel s

taff

als

o

con

trib

ute

d t

o t

he

de

lay.

It is

est

imat

ed 3

0-4

0 d

istri

cts

will

com

plet

e th

e Pr

iorit

y D

istri

ct B

CC

Stra

tegi

es in

Jan

uary

20

19.

Del

ayed

3. S

tunt

ing

and

nutri

tion

track

ing

and

mea

sure

-m

ent.

Firs

t pha

se m

ap o

f nu

tritio

nal s

tatu

s of

In

done

sia

usin

g th

e m

ost c

urre

nt d

ata

on fi

ve

sele

cted

dis

trict

s to

hel

p nu

tritio

n-re

late

d go

vern

-m

ent i

nter

vent

ions

. Thi

s m

ap w

ill b

e us

ed a

s a

prot

otyp

e th

at c

an b

e ex

-pa

nded

and

dev

elop

ed

to c

over

mor

e di

stric

ts,

and

to c

over

any

upd

ates

of

the

used

dat

a.

This

act

ivity

aim

s to

sup

port

the

MO

H a

nd B

PS to

revi

ew, a

dapt

, tes

t, an

d im

ple-

men

t sur

veys

and

sys

tem

s fo

r tra

ckin

g an

d m

easu

ring

key

nutri

tion

outc

omes

in

clud

ing

stun

ting.

Und

er th

is a

ctiv

ity, L

SP is

col

labo

ratin

g w

ith S

MER

U R

esea

rch

Inst

itute

to u

nder

-ta

ke a

sur

vey

to tr

ack

and

mea

sure

stu

ntin

g an

d nu

tritio

n re

late

d go

vern

men

t in

terv

entio

ns. D

urin

g th

e re

porti

ng p

erio

d, u

nder

LSP

’s s

uper

visi

on, S

MER

U

deve

lope

d th

e su

rvey

tool

s (q

uest

ionn

aire

), fie

ld te

sted

the

surv

ey to

ols,

trai

ned

the

enum

erat

ors,

and

und

erto

ok d

ata

colle

ctio

n. D

ata

anal

ysis

will

be

unde

rtake

n in

ear

ly 2

019

.

On

Trac

k

77

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

INEY

Pol

icy

and

Pro

gram

Sup

port

INEY

Pol

icy

and

Prog

ram

Su

ppor

t

Stun

ting

Nat

iona

l Stra

t-eg

y.W

orks

hops

with

sta

ke-

hold

ers

to d

evel

op

the

Stun

ting

Nat

iona

l St

rate

gy d

ocum

ent.

Fina

l dra

ft of

Stu

ntin

g N

atio

nal S

trate

gy.

Dur

ing

the

repo

rting

per

iod,

LSP

pro

vide

d te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e (th

roug

h co

nsul

-ta

nts)

, sup

porte

d co

ordi

natio

n an

d co

nsul

tatio

n m

eetin

gs w

ith re

leva

nt s

take

-ho

lder

s, a

nd fa

cilit

ated

a d

esig

n w

orks

hop

with

the

ten

rele

vant

GoI

min

istri

es

(Sep

tem

ber 2

018

) to

assi

st th

e G

oI to

fina

lize

the

Nat

iona

l Stu

ntin

g St

rate

gy. T

he

Stra

tegy

was

offi

cial

ly la

unch

ed a

t the

Rak

orni

s (R

apat

Koo

rdin

asi T

ekni

s or

Tec

h-ni

cal C

oord

inat

ion

Mee

ting)

in N

ovem

ber 2

018

.

Com

plet

ed

KIA

T G

UR

U

KIA

T G

uru

Vill

age

mon

thly

mee

t-in

gs c

ondu

cted

.

Scho

ol U

ser C

omm

it-te

es p

rese

nt e

valu

a-tio

n sc

ores

alo

ng w

ith

supp

ortin

g ev

iden

ce to

pr

ovid

er g

roup

s, v

illag

e go

vern

men

t rep

rese

nta-

tives

, and

wid

er c

omm

u-ni

ties.

Targ

et: 2

03

prim

ary

scho

ols

and

2,0

00

m

eetin

gs.

Vill

age

mon

thly

mee

tings

are

use

d to

dis

sem

inat

e ev

alua

tion

scor

es to

pro

vide

r gr

oups

(prin

cipa

ls a

nd te

ache

rs),

villa

ge g

over

nmen

t, an

d th

e w

ider

com

mun

ity.

All

parti

cipa

ting

scho

ols

cond

ucte

d m

onth

ly m

eetin

gs. A

s of

the

end

of A

pril

2018

, 2,

417

mon

thly

mee

tings

wer

e he

ld in

targ

et a

reas

. Thi

s ex

ceed

ed th

e ta

rget

of

2,0

00

mee

tings

(120

.85%

).

As

part

of th

e pi

lot,

LSP

prov

ided

cap

acity

bui

ldin

g tra

inin

g to

the

villa

ge s

take

-ho

lder

s to

und

erta

ke th

ese

mee

tings

inde

pend

ent o

f LSP

sup

port.

By

Apr

il 20

18,

2,62

8 co

mm

unity

mem

bers

and

Vill

age

Cad

res

wer

e tra

ined

to in

depe

nden

tly

faci

litat

e m

onth

ly a

nd e

valu

atio

n m

eetin

gs. A

fter A

pril

2018

, all

mon

thly

mee

tings

w

ere

carr

ied

out i

ndep

ende

ntly

by

villa

ge s

take

hold

ers

(Vill

age

Cad

res

and

Use

r C

omm

ittee

s).

Com

plet

ed

End-

of-s

emes

ter v

illag

e m

eetin

gs c

ondu

cted

.

Mee

ting

at th

e en

d of

sc

hool

sem

este

r to

eval

-ua

te S

ervi

ce A

gree

men

t, C

omm

unity

Sco

re C

ard,

an

d U

ser C

omm

ittee

(Tar

-ge

t: 35

0 m

eetin

gs h

eld)

End-

of-S

emes

ter v

illag

e m

eetin

gs a

re h

eld

to e

valu

ate

teac

her p

rese

nce

and

qual

ity o

f ser

vice

; and

to a

men

d Se

rvic

e A

gree

men

ts, C

omm

unity

Sco

re C

ard

Indi

cato

rs a

nd U

ser C

omm

ittee

mem

bers

.

As

of th

e en

d of

Apr

il 20

18, 2

03

mee

tings

wer

e he

ld (o

ne fo

r eac

h pi

lot s

choo

l).

The

targ

et o

f 350

was

not

met

as

the

end-

of-s

emes

ter v

illag

e m

eetin

gs w

ere

con-

duct

ed o

nly

once

inst

ead

of tw

ice

as p

lann

ed. I

nste

ad o

f the

mee

tings

, add

ition

al

capa

city

dev

elop

men

t tra

inin

g fo

r Vill

age

Cad

res

and

Use

r Com

mitt

ee m

embe

rs

wer

e he

ld to

impr

ove

thei

r cap

acity

to c

ondu

ct e

nd-o

f-sem

este

r vill

age

mee

tings

in

depe

nden

t of t

he p

roje

ct fa

cilit

ator

s. B

y A

pril

2018

, 2,6

28 c

omm

unity

mem

bers

an

d V

illag

e C

adre

s w

ere

train

ed to

inde

pend

ently

faci

litat

e m

onth

ly a

nd e

valu

a-tio

n m

eetin

gs. D

ata

from

ear

ly D

ecem

ber 2

017

indi

cate

d th

at m

eetin

g pa

rtici

pant

s w

ere

48.7

% fe

mal

e an

d 51

.3%

mal

e. A

fter A

pril

2018

, all

end-

of-s

emes

ter v

illag

e m

eetin

gs w

ere

carr

ied

out i

ndep

ende

ntly

by

villa

ge s

take

hold

ers

(vill

age

cadr

es

and

user

com

mitt

ees)

Com

plet

ed

78

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

KIA

T G

uru

Rele

vant

gov

ernm

ent

regu

latio

ns is

sued

.Is

suan

ce o

f rel

evan

t GoI

re

gula

tions

at n

atio

nal,

dist

rict,

and

villa

ge-le

vels

to

ena

ble

impl

emen

tatio

n of

com

mun

ity e

mpo

wer

-m

ent a

nd p

ay fo

r per

for-

man

ce m

echa

nism

s. K

ey

regu

latio

ns in

clud

e:

1. M

oU b

etw

een

MoE

C

and

Bup

ati o

f pilo

t dis

-tri

cts;

2. T

echn

ical

gui

delin

es;

3. B

upat

i reg

ulat

ion;

4.

Hea

d of

Edu

catio

n D

e-pa

rtmen

t dec

ree;

and

5. H

ead

of V

illag

e de

cree

.

LSP

supp

orts

the

issu

ing

of re

leva

nt g

over

nmen

t reg

ulat

ions

and

dec

rees

that

sup

port

th

e K

IAT

Gur

u Pi

lot a

nd e

nabl

e pa

ymen

t of T

each

er S

peci

al A

llow

ance

s ba

sed

on e

ither

te

ache

r pre

senc

e or

teac

her p

erfo

rman

ce, a

s ve

rified

or e

valu

ated

by

com

mun

ity m

em-

bers

.

In A

pril

2018

, The

Min

iste

r of E

duca

tion

and

Cul

ture

(MoE

C) i

ssue

d th

e de

cree

s fo

r N

atio

nal P

riorit

y Pr

ogra

ms

on S

peci

al A

llow

ance

and

Pro

fess

iona

l Allo

wan

ce: (

1) M

inis

-te

r of M

oEC

Reg

ulat

ion

No.

95-

P-20

18 o

n N

atio

nal P

riorit

y Pr

ogra

m fo

r Tea

cher

Spe

cial

A

llow

ance

and

Tea

cher

Pro

fess

iona

l Allo

wan

ce; (

2) S

ecre

tary

Gen

eral

Reg

ulat

ion

No.

11

/ 20

18 o

n Te

chni

cal G

uide

line

for P

olic

y Pi

lot P

rogr

am o

n Te

ache

r Per

form

ance

and

A

ccou

ntab

ility

for D

istri

butio

n of

Tea

cher

Spe

cial

Allo

wan

ce.

Reco

rds

on v

ario

us re

gula

tions

issu

ed re

late

d to

KIA

T G

uru

in 2

018

, inc

lude

:

• 4 M

oEC

regu

latio

ns is

sued

rela

ted

to N

atio

nal C

oord

inat

ion

Team

, var

ious

allo

wan

ces

in 2

018

, Prio

rity

Prog

ram

s on

TKG

and

TPG

, and

Tec

hnic

al G

uide

line

for P

olic

y Pi

lot

Prog

ram

on

Teac

her P

erfo

rman

ce a

nd A

ccou

ntab

ility

for D

istri

butio

n of

TKG

.

• 7 M

emor

andu

m o

f Und

erst

andi

ng b

etw

een

DG

TEP,

TN

P2K

, and

5 h

ead

of p

ilot d

istri

cts

to c

ontin

ue th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of K

IAT

Gur

u w

ere

sign

ed o

n Ja

nuar

y 20

18.

• 5 H

ead

of D

istri

ct R

egul

atio

ns o

n K

IAT

Gur

u Pi

lot w

ere

issu

ed b

etw

een

Janu

ary

and

Mar

ch 2

018

.

• 5 H

ead

of D

istri

ct D

ecre

es o

n K

IAT

Gur

u D

istri

ct C

oord

inat

ion

Team

wer

e is

sued

be-

twee

n M

arch

and

Apr

il 20

18.

• 5 H

ead

of D

istri

ct D

ecre

es o

n K

IAT

Gur

u Pi

lot S

choo

ls a

nd T

each

ers

wer

e is

sued

be-

twee

n Ja

nuar

y an

d M

arch

20

18.

• 5 H

ead

of D

istri

ct D

ecre

e on

KIA

T G

uru

Tech

nica

l Gui

delin

e fo

r Pay

men

t of T

unja

ngan

K

husu

s w

ere

issu

ed b

etw

een

Janu

ary

and

Mar

ch 2

018

.

• 5 H

ead

of E

duca

tion

Dep

artm

ent D

ecre

e on

Tec

hnic

al G

uide

line

for E

valu

atio

n of

Te

ache

r Ser

vice

Per

form

ance

wer

e is

sued

bet

wee

n Ja

nuar

y an

d M

arch

20

18.

• 12

vario

us d

istri

ct d

ecis

ions

and

circ

ular

s on

bud

get a

lloca

tion

and

othe

r im

plem

enta

-tio

n su

ppor

t.

On

Trac

k

79

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

KIA

T G

uru

• 12

vario

us d

istri

ct d

ecis

ions

and

circ

ular

s on

bud

get a

lloca

tion

and

othe

r im

ple-

men

tatio

n su

ppor

t.

• 190

Hea

d of

Vill

age

Dec

rees

on

KIA

T G

uru

Com

mun

ity C

omm

ittee

.

• 20

2 H

ead

of V

illag

e D

ecre

es o

n K

IAT

Gur

u V

illag

e C

adre

.

LSP

is a

lso

prov

idin

g te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e to

MoE

C to

revi

se th

e D

ecre

e on

Na-

tiona

l Coo

rdin

atio

n Te

am fo

r KIA

T G

uru

(DG

-GTK

Dec

ree

No.

241

99/B

/HTK

/20

16

issu

ed o

n Ju

ly 2

5, 2

016

). In

Sep

tem

ber 2

018

, LSP

pro

vide

d te

chni

cal i

nput

s to

M

oEC

. The

revi

sed

decr

ee is

exp

ecte

d to

be

issu

ed d

urin

g th

e fir

st q

uarte

r of

2019

.

Teac

her S

peci

al

Allo

wan

ce (T

unja

ngan

K

husu

s G

uru,

or T

KG)

for a

ssig

ned

teac

hers

ar

e pa

id a

ccor

ding

to

KIA

T G

uru

form

ula

(PPM

m

odel

s).

Spec

ial A

llow

ance

for

teac

hers

in T

reat

men

t G

roup

2 a

re p

aid

base

d on

teac

her p

rese

nce,

an

d in

Tre

atm

ent G

roup

3

are

paid

bas

ed o

n te

ach-

er s

ervi

ce p

erfo

rman

ce.

Targ

et: 1

35 p

rimar

y sc

hool

s or

85%

(N

.B.:

Trea

tmen

t Gro

up 1

is th

e co

ntro

l gro

up).

This

KIA

T G

uru

activ

ity in

volv

es th

e pa

ymen

t of T

KG b

ased

on

KIA

T G

uru

form

ula

— b

ased

eith

er o

n te

ache

r pre

senc

e or

teac

her s

ervi

ce p

erfo

rman

ce.

As

of 3

0 S

epte

mbe

r 20

18, T

KG, w

hich

is a

ssig

ned

and

paid

acc

ordi

ng to

the

KIA

T G

uru

form

ula

(Pay

-for-

Perfo

rman

ce o

r PPM

mod

els)

, was

pai

d to

90.

15%

(of 7

83)

teac

hers

, mee

ting

the

85%

targ

et.

How

ever

, thi

s to

tal w

as lo

wer

than

reco

rded

in q

uarte

r tw

o of

20

18 (9

9% o

f tea

ch-

ers)

as

som

e (9

5) te

ache

rs w

ere

abse

nt d

ue to

teac

her t

rain

ing

and

cons

eque

ntly

di

d no

t rec

eive

the

TKG

. In

addi

tion,

two

scho

ols

subm

itted

thei

r rep

orts

late

so

the

data

from

thos

e sc

hool

s is

not

incl

uded

with

in th

e la

test

est

imat

es, a

s do

cu-

men

ted

in th

e IS

R N

ovem

ber 2

018

.

Com

plet

ed

Mee

tings

and

wor

k-sh

ops

to d

raft

regu

la-

tions

, stre

ngth

en c

apac

-ity

, und

erst

andi

ng o

f the

K

IAT

Gur

u m

echa

nism

s,

and

owne

rshi

p by

GoI

offi

cial

s.

Ta

rget

: 750

MoE

C a

nd

dist

rict g

over

nmen

t offi

-ci

als

rece

ived

cap

acity

bu

ildin

g.

The

mee

tings

and

wor

ksho

ps a

im to

stre

ngth

en c

apac

ity, u

nder

stan

ding

of t

he

KIA

T G

uru

mec

hani

sm, a

nd o

wne

rshi

p of

gov

ernm

ent o

ffici

als.

It is

exp

ecte

d th

at

afte

r the

impl

emen

tatio

n vi

llage

s w

ill re

ceiv

e im

prov

ed c

apac

ity s

uppo

rt fro

m

natio

nal a

nd d

istri

ct g

over

nmen

t.A

s at

30

Nov

embe

r 20

18, 9

95 M

oEC

and

dis

trict

offi

cial

s pa

rtici

pate

d in

cap

acity

bu

ildin

g ac

tiviti

es (8

7% m

ale

and

13%

fem

ale)

. Thi

s nu

mbe

r exc

eeds

the

orig

inal

ta

rget

of 3

75 s

taff,

and

adj

uste

d ta

rget

of 7

50 s

taff.

In N

ovem

ber 2

018

, as

part

of

the

proj

ect r

estru

ctur

ing,

this

targ

et w

as in

crea

sed

(from

350

to 7

50 s

taff

) in

re-

spon

se to

a re

ques

t fro

m g

over

nmen

t to

cont

inue

pro

vidi

ng te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e to

hel

p su

stai

n th

e pi

lot.

Com

plet

ed

Trai

ning

s an

d on

-the-

job

capa

city

dev

elop

men

t fo

r Vill

age

Cad

re a

nd

Use

r Com

mitt

ee m

em-

bers

to h

old

teac

hers

ac

coun

tabl

e.

N

umbe

r of V

illag

e C

adre

an

d U

ser C

omm

ittee

m

embe

rs a

ble

to h

old

teac

hers

acc

ount

able

. Ta

rget

: 2,0

00

peo

ple

in

203

prim

ary

scho

ols

Trai

ning

and

on-

the-

job

capa

city

dev

elop

men

t act

iviti

es a

im to

incr

ease

the

capa

c-ity

of V

illag

e C

adre

and

Use

r Com

mitt

ee in

eva

luat

ing

teac

her p

erfo

rman

ce a

nd

serv

ice

qual

ity. F

ollo

win

g th

e tra

inin

gs, v

illag

e co

mm

uniti

es w

ill b

e ab

le to

con

duct

m

onito

ring

and

eval

uatio

n of

teac

hers

inde

pend

ently

.

As

at 3

0 A

pril

2018

, 2,6

28 (8

3 %

mal

e an

d 17

% fe

mal

e) V

illag

e C

adre

and

Use

r C

omm

ittee

mem

bers

wer

e tra

ined

, whi

ch e

xcee

ded

the

orig

inal

targ

et o

f 2,0

00

(13

1%).

Com

plet

ed

80

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

KIA

T G

uru

On-

goin

g te

chni

cal

inpu

ts to

the

natio

nal

gove

rnm

ent o

ffici

als.

In

terv

entio

n de

sign

and

pr

ojec

t sus

tain

abili

ty

appr

oved

by

the

gove

rn-

men

t.

The

obje

ctiv

e of

this

KIA

T G

uru

activ

ity is

to p

rovi

de in

put t

o na

tiona

l gov

ernm

ent

offici

als

on th

e in

terv

entio

n, a

nd to

pro

vide

pol

icy

reco

mm

enda

tions

for s

usta

in-

abili

ty.

The

GoI

app

rove

d th

e in

terv

entio

n de

sign

and

pro

ject

sus

tain

abili

ty.

Co

mp

lete

d

On-

go

ing

tech

nica

l in

put

s an

d im

ple

me

n-ta

tion

sup

po

rts

to th

e im

ple

me

ntin

g a

ge

ncy.

Q

ualit

y as

sura

nce

of

wor

k pl

an, i

mpl

emen

ta-

tion

(incl

udin

g fid

ucia

ry),

and

repo

rt.

The

obje

ctiv

e of

this

KIA

T G

uru

activ

ity is

to p

rovi

de te

chni

cal i

nput

and

impl

e-m

enta

tion

supp

ort t

o th

e im

plem

entin

g ag

ency

. It i

s ex

pect

ed th

at a

fter t

he im

ple-

men

tatio

n vi

llage

s w

ill b

e ab

le to

sus

tain

act

iviti

es in

depe

nden

tly.

The

wor

k pr

ogra

m a

nd im

plem

enta

tion

repo

rts u

ntil

Sept

embe

r 20

17 w

ere

appr

oved

by

the

natio

nal g

over

nmen

t and

dis

sem

inat

ed to

dis

trict

gov

ernm

ents

. Th

e re

vise

d w

ork

plan

(unt

il en

d of

Jun

e 20

18) w

as a

lso

appr

oved

by

the

natio

nal

and

dist

rict g

over

nmen

ts.

Co

mp

lete

d

M&

E an

d S

peci

al S

tudi

es

Ana

lytic

sSe

ntin

el V

illag

es L

ongi

-tu

dina

l Stu

dyPr

esen

tatio

n of

resu

lts

(BB

Ls).

PPT,

min

utes

of m

eetin

g.Th

ree

Sent

inel

Vill

ages

pre

sent

atio

ns w

ere

deliv

ered

:1. T

he R

oles

of S

upra

-Vill

age

Gov

ernm

ent i

n V

illag

e La

w Im

plem

enta

tion

resu

lts,

whi

ch w

ere

final

ized

in D

ecem

ber 2

017

, wer

e pr

esen

ted

by S

MER

U to

GoI

, ac

adem

ic in

stitu

tions

, and

oth

er d

evel

opm

ent p

rogr

ams

(KO

MPA

K, K

SI, J

-PA

L) in

Fe

brua

ry 2

018

.2.

The

Pla

nnin

g an

d B

udge

ting

Proc

ess

in th

e V

illag

e re

sults

wer

e pr

esen

ted

by

SMER

U in

Mar

ch 2

018

. The

pre

sent

atio

n w

as a

ttend

ed b

y to

GoI

, DFA

T, U

SAID

, an

d ot

her d

evel

opm

ent p

rogr

ams

(MA

MPU

and

KO

MPA

K).

3. In

itial

Fin

ding

s of

Sen

tinel

Vill

ages

End

-line

Stu

dy (D

ec 2

018

).

Com

plet

ed

Fie

ld S

upe

rvis

ions

for

Qua

litat

ive

Te

am.

Supe

rvis

ion

repo

rts.

The

supe

rvis

ion

mis

sion

, whi

ch w

as c

ondu

cted

in W

onog

iri (9

-13

Apr

il 20

18) a

nd

Nga

da (2

2-27

Apr

il 20

18),

aim

ed to

sup

ervi

se a

nd o

bser

ve S

entin

el V

illag

es' e

nd-

line

data

col

lect

ion,

whi

ch w

as c

arrie

d ou

t by

SMER

U re

sear

cher

s. In

add

ition

, it

also

aim

ed to

hig

hlig

ht in

tere

stin

g fin

ding

s co

ncer

ning

Vill

age

Law

impl

emen

-ta

tion

at th

e st

udy

loca

tions

. In

July

20

18, t

he re

sear

ch fi

rm (S

MER

U) w

ent t

o th

e fie

ld to

pre

sent

key

find

ings

to th

e vi

llage

gov

ernm

ents

as

a pa

rt of

the

clos

ing

stra

tegy

. How

ever

, LSP

did

not

par

ticip

ate

in th

is a

ctiv

ity.

Com

plet

ed

Publ

icat

ions

and

dis

-se

min

atio

nsA

rticl

es. P

PTs

and

MoM

s fo

r eac

h B

BL

uplo

aded

in

web

site

1. La

unch

ed th

e Se

ntin

el V

illag

es (S

V) w

ebpa

ge to

dis

sem

inat

e th

e st

udy’

s fin

d-in

gs a

nd m

ater

ials

http

s://l

ocal

solu

tions

topo

verty

.org

2. S

V B

asel

ine

Ove

rvie

w R

epor

t upl

oade

d to

web

site

and

pro

mot

ed v

ia tw

itter

(p

ublis

h ye

ar: A

pril

2018

).3.

SV

Bas

elin

e Re

port

uplo

aded

to w

ebsi

te (p

ublis

h ye

ar: A

pril

2018

) (qu

alita

tive

repo

rt by

SM

ERU

).4.

Pol

icy

Brie

f “Pr

omot

ing

Com

mun

ity-b

ased

Vill

age

Supe

rvis

ion”

upl

oade

d to

w

ebsi

te (p

ublis

h ye

ar: A

pril

2018

) upl

oade

d by

SM

ERU

(pub

lish

year

: Apr

il 20

18).

5. B

BLs

on

the

Plan

ning

and

Bud

getin

g Pr

oces

s in

the

Vill

age,

upl

oade

d on

web

-si

te (p

ublis

h ye

ar M

arch

20

18).

On

Trac

k

81

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Ana

lytic

s6.

Pol

icy

Brie

f on

Cas

h fo

r Wor

ks u

ploa

ded

to w

ebsi

te (p

ublis

h ye

ar: N

ovem

ber

2018

) and

upl

oade

d by

SM

ERU

(pub

lish

year

: Nov

embe

r 20

18).

7.

Cas

e St

udy

Repo

rt on

Vill

age

Fund

s U

tiliz

atio

n w

ill b

e pu

blis

hed

in J

anua

ry

2019

.8.

Tw

o po

licy

brie

fs, “

An

oper

atio

naliz

ed R

PJM

Des

a” a

nd “s

impl

ifica

tion

of R

PJM

D

esa”

are

cur

rent

ly u

nder

goin

g fin

al re

visi

ons

and

plan

to b

e pu

blis

hed

by th

e en

d of

20

18.

9. O

n Se

ptem

ber 4

, 20

18, L

SP A

naly

tics

Team

pre

sent

ed k

ey fi

ndin

gs o

f Sen

tinel

V

illag

es s

tudy

(and

VIP

ER) t

o Ke

men

ko P

MK

.

End-

line

Stud

y.En

d-lin

e st

udy

repo

rt.Fi

eld

supe

rvis

ion

for t

he E

nd-li

ne d

ata

colle

ctio

n w

as c

ondu

cted

in A

pril

2018

in

two

dist

ricts

(Won

ogiri

and

Nga

da).

Dat

a co

llect

ion

was

com

plet

ed o

n 13

May

20

18. L

SP s

uppo

rted

the

train

ing

of th

e D

ata

Ass

ista

nts

in M

arch

20

18. T

he

team

als

o co

nduc

ted

a fo

cus

grou

p di

scus

sion

(FG

D) (

15-1

6 M

ay 2

018

) to

colle

ct

info

rmat

ion

and

obse

rvat

ions

from

the

field

dat

a as

sist

ants

abo

ut tr

ansp

aren

cy,

acco

unta

bilit

y, a

nd p

artic

ipat

ion

(opp

osed

to c

olle

ctin

g th

e da

ta fr

om q

uest

ion-

naire

s).

Dat

a cl

eani

ng c

omm

ence

d at

the

end

of M

ay 2

018

. Dat

a an

alys

is (q

ualit

ativ

e an

d qu

antit

ativ

e) c

omm

ence

d in

Aug

ust 2

018

and

was

com

plet

ed b

y th

e en

d of

Sep

tem

ber 2

018

. SM

ERU

(the

rese

arch

firm

) is

resp

onsi

ble

to th

e qu

alita

tive

com

pone

nt, u

nder

LSP

’s s

uper

visi

on. T

o co

nsol

idat

e th

e fin

al fi

ndin

gs fo

r bot

h qu

antit

ativ

e an

d qu

alita

tive

com

pone

nts,

LSP

, SM

ERU

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te, a

nd fi

ve

loca

l res

earc

hers

con

duct

ed a

n en

d-lin

e w

ritin

g w

orks

hop

in W

est S

umat

ra fr

om

30 S

epte

mbe

r to

6 O

ctob

er 2

018

.

The

2nd

draf

t was

uns

atis

fact

ory

and

ther

efor

e SM

ERU

’s c

ontra

ct w

as e

xten

ded

(with

no

addi

tiona

l cos

t) to

allo

w ti

me

to re

vise

the

draf

t. SM

ERU

has

just

sub

mit-

ted

the

3rd

draf

t and

LSP

Ana

lytic

s Te

am is

revi

ewin

g th

e do

cum

ent.

The

writ

ing

proc

ess

also

took

long

er th

an e

xpec

ted

as th

e te

am p

ulle

d in

som

e ad

ditio

nal

mac

ro a

nd s

econ

dary

dat

a to

stre

ngth

en th

e re

port’

s an

alys

is a

nd s

tory

line.

The

re

port

is e

xpec

ted

to b

e co

mpl

eted

in e

arly

20

19.

On

Trac

k

Impr

ovin

g D

ata

to d

e-liv

er re

sult

in s

ervi

ce d

e-liv

ery

— S

USE

NA

S an

d an

thro

pom

etric

Pilo

t.

Dev

elop

ing

conc

ept

note

/TO

R fo

r SU

SEN

AS

an

d an

thro

pom

etric

Pi

lot.

Con

cept

not

e/TO

R V

il-la

ge D

ata

Stre

ngth

enin

g.LS

P is

sup

porti

ng B

PS a

nd B

alitb

angk

es, M

oH, t

o co

nduc

t a S

USE

NA

S an

d an

thro

pom

etric

pilo

t in

2 di

stric

ts (P

asam

an B

arat

and

Dem

ak).

The

pilo

t will

test

th

e SU

SEN

AS

and

anth

ropo

met

ric m

odul

es a

nd in

clud

e fie

ld g

uida

nce

to h

elp

ensu

re h

igh

qual

ity d

ata

is c

olle

cted

. The

pilo

t dra

ft co

ncep

t not

e w

as fi

naliz

ed

and

done

in S

epte

mbe

r 20

18.

Com

plet

ed

82

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Ana

lytic

sPi

lot t

est.

Pilo

t tes

t im

plem

ente

d.B

etw

een

25 N

ov–

2 D

ecem

ber 2

018

, the

ana

lytic

team

impl

emen

ted

the

pilo

t tes

t in

Pas

aman

Bar

at a

nd D

emak

. Dat

a cl

eani

ng w

as u

nder

take

n in

ear

ly D

ecem

ber

2018

. Pi

lot t

est l

esso

ns le

arne

d w

ere

done

in D

ecem

ber 1

0, 2

018

in J

akar

ta. A

nd

the

eval

uatio

n of

this

pilo

t was

don

e in

mid

- D

ecem

ber 2

018

Com

plet

ed

Dev

elop

ann

ual I

NEY

in

dica

tors

.

Ann

ual I

NEY

In

dica

tors

.LS

P co

nduc

ted

capa

city

bui

ldin

g ac

tiviti

es w

ith B

PS a

nd M

OH

to h

elp

prep

are

the

annu

al IN

EY in

dica

tors

. Thi

s in

clud

ed:

1. A

wor

ksho

p w

here

an

LSP

Con

sulta

nt g

ave

guid

ance

on

how

to s

elec

t and

ca

lcul

ate

the

prox

y va

riabl

es (D

ec 10

, 20

18).

2. L

SP a

ttend

ed a

nd p

artic

ipat

ed in

BPS

and

Bal

itban

gkes

(Nat

iona

l Ins

titut

ion

of

Hea

lth R

esea

rch

Dev

elop

men

t, M

OH

) wor

ksho

p to

agr

ee a

bout

the

indi

cato

rs.

3. L

SP c

ondu

cted

an

FGD

whe

re B

PS a

nd M

OH

pre

sent

ed th

e in

dica

tors

and

fo

rmul

a to

rela

ted

min

istri

es (D

ec 19

, 20

18).

Com

plet

ed

M&

E an

d A

ccou

ntab

ility

To

ols

(Civ

il Se

rvic

e D

ata

Ana

lysi

s).

St

udy

Repo

rt.In

Apr

il 20

18, L

SP fi

naliz

ed th

e B

KN

ana

lysi

s, in

clud

ing

a re

port

on ‘M

erit,

Dis

-cr

imin

atio

n, a

nd D

emoc

ratiz

atio

n: A

n A

naly

sis

of P

rom

otio

n Pa

ttern

s in

Indo

ne-

sia’

s C

ivil

Serv

ice’

. The

fina

l rep

ort —

‘Map

ping

Indo

nesi

a’s

Civ

il Se

rvic

e,’ a

nd a

n ac

com

pany

ing

info

grap

hic,

was

pub

lishe

d in

Nov

embe

r 20

18. T

he re

port

and

info

grap

hic

are

avai

labl

e on

the

LSP

web

site

. The

GoI

(Sta

te C

ivil

Serv

ice

Age

ncy

and

Men

PAN

) is

usin

g th

e an

alys

is to

info

rm th

eir p

olic

y an

d op

erat

iona

l wor

k.

Com

plet

ed

VIP

eva

luat

ion.

Dev

elop

ing

conc

ept

note

/TO

R.

Con

cept

not

e/TO

R.

The

VIP

eva

luat

ion

surv

ey a

ims

to c

aptu

re b

asel

ine

cond

ition

s at

the

begi

nnin

g of

the

prog

ram

’s im

plem

enta

tion

and

to g

athe

r inf

orm

atio

n on

faci

litat

ion

in th

e tra

nsiti

on p

erio

d.

The

VIP

eva

luat

ion

surv

ey is

pla

nned

to b

e co

nduc

ted

in 2

0 d

istri

cts

in e

ight

to

ten

prov

ince

s co

verin

g 36

0 v

illag

es a

nd 3

,60

0 h

ouse

hold

s (10

hou

seho

lds

per

villa

ge).

The

surv

ey w

ill in

terv

iew

vill

age

faci

litat

ors

(Pen

dam

ping

Des

a an

d Pe

n-da

mpi

ng L

okal

Des

a), v

illag

e he

ads,

and

com

mun

ity le

ader

s. T

he d

ata

colle

ctio

n of

this

sur

vey

is e

xpec

ted

com

men

ce d

urin

g th

e fir

st h

alf o

f 20

19.

A d

raft

TOR

was

fina

lized

in J

anua

ry 2

018

. The

eva

luat

ion

will

focu

s on

a b

asel

ine

and

end

line

stud

y to

see

the

villa

ge c

hara

cter

istic

diff

eren

ces

befo

re a

nd a

fter

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

VIP

Pro

gram

.

Com

plet

ed

Dev

elop

ing

ques

tion-

naire

s.Q

uest

ionn

aire

s.Th

e te

am w

ill u

se a

mod

ified

ver

sion

of t

he o

rigin

al q

uest

ionn

aire

, whi

ch w

as

deve

lope

d la

st y

ear.

The

ques

tionn

aire

is c

urre

ntly

bei

ng re

vise

d.O

n Tr

ack

83

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Bas

elin

e da

ta c

olle

ctio

n.Fi

eld

data

.A

sur

vey

firm

was

sel

ecte

d in

Dec

embe

r 20

18. I

t is

expe

cted

that

dat

a co

llect

ion

will

com

men

ce d

urin

g th

e fir

st h

alf o

f 20

19.

On

Trac

k

Rur

al P

over

ty A

naly

sis.

1. Re

port

on ru

ral p

over

ty

in In

done

sia;

2.

Det

aile

d pr

esen

tatio

n,

base

d on

adv

ance

d an

a-ly

tical

find

ings

and

pol

icy

reco

mm

enda

tions

.

This

act

ivity

aim

s to

sup

port

the

GoI

to u

nder

stan

d th

e dr

iver

s of

rura

l pov

erty

an

d ec

onom

ic m

argi

naliz

atio

n, a

s w

ell a

s id

entif

ying

opp

ortu

nitie

s th

roug

h w

hich

V

illag

e La

w m

ay s

uppo

rt m

ore

incl

usiv

e gr

owth

.

LSP

has

mob

ilize

d a

team

for t

his

activ

ity.

LSP

com

men

ced

prel

imin

ary

anal

ysis

and

ear

ly d

iagn

ostic

wor

k in

May

20

18.

A c

once

pt n

ote

revi

ew is

cur

rent

ly s

ched

uled

for J

anua

ry 2

019

. Th

e fu

ll re

port

of

this

act

ivity

is e

xpec

ted

to b

e pu

blis

hed

in 2

019

; and

det

aile

d pr

esen

tatio

n is

ex-

pect

ed to

be

prod

uced

in ti

me

for t

he M

arch

20

19 In

done

sia

Econ

omic

Qua

rterly

, an

d th

e A

pril

2019

nat

iona

l ele

ctio

ns.

On

Trac

k

Mea

surin

g V

illag

e D

e-ve

lopm

ent P

rogr

ess.

Har

mon

ized

Vill

age

Inde

x.LS

P is

pro

vidi

ng te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e to

Bap

pena

s to

har

mon

ize

and

stre

ngth

en

the

curr

ent v

illag

es in

dice

s in

PO

DES

(cen

sus

that

use

d to

col

lect

dat

a fo

r the

in-

dex

mea

sure

men

t for

vill

ages

) to

bette

r refl

ect v

illag

e pe

rform

ance

and

impr

ove

the

inst

rum

ent t

o co

llect

the

data

.

The

inst

rum

ent w

ill b

e fie

ld te

sted

in A

pril

2019

toge

ther

with

BPS

and

fina

lized

du

ring

the

first

hal

f of 2

019

. Dur

ing

2019

, LSP

will

als

o as

sist

Bap

pena

s to

ana

lyze

th

e co

llect

ed d

ata

and

esta

blis

h a

mec

hani

sm to

feed

the

data

bac

k to

vill

ages

. LS

P w

ill a

lso

assi

st B

appe

nas

to te

st h

ow v

illag

es c

an u

se th

is d

ata

to in

form

thei

r ow

n pl

anni

ng p

roce

sses

.

On

Trac

k

Gen

eras

i Im

pact

Eva

lua-

tions

(IE)

.D

ata

Ana

lysi

s.A

naly

sis

resu

lts.

The

IE’s

qua

ntita

tive

findi

ngs

wer

e pr

esen

ted

to B

appe

nas

in J

anua

ry 2

018

. In

May

20

18, t

he c

ompl

ete

IE re

sults

(qua

litat

ive

and

quan

titat

ive)

resu

lts w

ere

pres

ente

d to

a w

ider

aud

ienc

e at

the

DFA

T su

ppor

ted

Bap

pena

s-Ja

mee

l Pov

erty

A

ctio

n La

b (J

PAL)

Evi

denc

e on

Stu

ntin

g fro

m T

hree

Ran

dom

ized

Eva

luat

ions

in

Indo

nesi

a ev

ent i

n M

ay 2

018

.

Com

plet

ed

Ana

lytic

s -

ECED

ECED

Fro

ntlin

e Pi

lot

Eval

uatio

ns.

Proc

ess

eval

uatio

n on

im

plem

enta

tion

of tr

ain-

ing

usin

g di

stric

t-bas

ed

com

mun

ity fo

cuse

d sy

stem

in 2

5 di

stric

ts.

The

proc

ess

eval

uatio

n ai

ms

to a

sses

s ho

w w

ell t

he E

CED

Pilo

t act

iviti

es w

ere

impl

emen

ted,

iden

tify

fact

ors

influ

enci

ng th

e m

odel

’s e

ffica

cy a

nd u

nder

stan

d ho

w th

e m

odel

can

be

mor

e eff

ectiv

e in

the

futu

re, i

s co

mpl

ete.

A p

relim

inar

y re

port,

whi

ch o

utlin

es th

e fin

ding

s, w

as d

evel

oped

in 2

018

. The

repo

rt su

mm

a-riz

es k

ey re

sults

and

find

ings

from

the

com

plet

e pr

oces

s ev

alua

tion,

the

initi

al

teac

her c

ompe

tenc

e ev

alua

tion,

and

thre

e (o

f five

) sus

tain

abili

ty a

nd s

cala

bilit

y ca

se s

tudi

es. T

he p

relim

inar

y re

port

will

be

shar

ed w

ith c

ount

erpa

rts a

nd d

onor

s in

ear

ly 2

019

.

On

Trac

k

84

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Ana

lytic

s -

ECED

ECED

Fro

ntlin

e Pi

lot

Eval

uatio

ns.

It is

exp

ecte

d th

at L

SP w

ill d

eliv

er a

fina

l rep

ort,

whi

ch w

ill o

utlin

e fin

ding

s fro

m a

ll co

mpl

ete

eval

uatio

ns, i

n M

arch

20

19.

In N

ovem

ber 2

018

, the

find

ings

wer

e pr

esen

ted

at a

Dire

ctor

ate

of E

CED

Tea

ch-

ers

(MoE

C o

rgan

ized

) wor

ksho

p in

Nov

embe

r 20

18. T

he m

eetin

g w

as a

ttend

ed

by M

oEC

and

the

25 p

ilot d

istri

cts,

alo

ng w

ith D

FAT.

LSP

pro

vide

d te

chni

cal

supp

ort f

or th

e pr

ogra

m’s

pre

para

tion

(incl

udin

g id

entif

ying

suc

cess

sto

ries)

and

w

orks

hop

coor

dina

tion.

The

resu

lts w

ere

also

pre

sent

ed a

t the

UN

ESC

O-H

am-

den

awar

ds c

erem

ony

and

exhi

bitio

n in

Oct

ober

20

18. T

hey

will

als

o be

pre

sent

-ed

at t

he S

EAM

EO C

CEP

.

On

Trac

k

Eval

uatio

n on

Tea

cher

C

ompe

tenc

e us

ing

Mea

sure

men

t of E

arly

Le

arni

ng E

nviro

nmen

t to

ols

in 10

dis

trict

s.

Repo

rt an

d po

licy

reco

m-

men

datio

ns.

This

eva

luat

ion

aim

s to

und

erst

and

whe

ther

the

pilo

t was

effe

ctiv

e in

impr

ovin

g te

ache

r com

pete

ncy.

For

teac

hers

trai

ned

in 2

016

(Bat

ch 1)

, the

bas

elin

e an

d en

dlin

e da

ta c

olle

ctio

n (v

ideo

tapi

ng) i

s co

mpl

ete.

For

teac

hers

trai

ned

in 2

017

(B

atch

2),

data

col

lect

ion

(vid

eota

ping

) was

slig

htly

del

ayed

due

to o

pera

tiona

l/pr

ocur

emen

t del

ays,

but

was

fina

lized

in O

ctob

er 2

018

. Dat

a an

alys

is fo

r Bat

ch

2 co

mm

ence

d in

Nov

embe

r 20

18. T

he fi

ndin

gs fr

om B

atch

1 ar

e in

clud

ed w

ithin

th

e Pr

elim

inar

y Re

port

(fina

lized

in N

ovem

ber 2

018

). Fi

ndin

gs fr

om th

e se

cond

ba

tch

will

be

incl

uded

with

in th

e Fi

nal R

epor

t, w

hich

is e

xpec

ted

to b

e fin

aliz

ed in

M

arch

20

19.

On

Trac

k

Repo

rt on

like

lihoo

d of

sus

tain

abili

ty a

nd

scal

abili

ty.

Repo

rt an

d po

licy

reco

m-

men

datio

ns.

The

sust

aina

bilit

y an

d sc

alab

ility

cas

e st

udie

s ai

m to

iden

tify

the

pote

ntia

l for

sus

-ta

inab

ility

and

futu

re s

calin

g of

the

ECED

Fro

ntlin

e Pi

lot’s

dis

trict

-bas

ed tr

aini

ng

syst

em w

ithin

the

cont

ext o

f the

Vill

age

Law

. In

2017

, LSP

com

plet

ed c

ase

stud

ies

in th

ree

(of fi

ve) d

istri

cts

(Nga

njuk

, Sum

baw

a, a

nd T

TU).

The

field

vis

its in

the

final

tw

o di

stric

ts (i

n O

KI,

Sout

h Su

mat

ra, a

nd S

umba

wa)

wer

e co

mpl

eted

ove

r Nov

em-

ber t

o D

ecem

ber 2

018

. In

2018

, LSP

pre

pare

d a

Prel

imin

ary

Repo

rt w

hich

out

lines

th

e fin

ding

s fro

m th

e fir

st th

ree

case

stu

dies

, suc

h as

find

ings

on

key

“loca

l in

itiat

ives

to s

uppo

rt EC

ED p

rogr

am th

roug

h th

e V

illag

e Fu

nd”

(e.g

., tw

o su

cces

s st

orie

s fro

m S

ukab

umi a

nd G

oran

talo

, and

one

uns

ucce

ssfu

l sto

ry fr

om a

vill

age

in P

olew

ali M

anda

r). F

indi

ngs

from

all

five

dist

ricts

will

be

incl

uded

with

in th

e Fi

nal

Repo

rt, w

hich

is e

xpec

ted

to b

e co

mpl

eted

in M

arch

20

19.

On

Trac

k

Ana

lytic

s - K

IAT

Gur

uIm

plem

enta

tion

of

base

line

surv

ey in

270

vi

llage

s.

Bas

elin

e su

rvey

repo

rt.

The

base

line

surv

ey a

ims

to g

athe

r dat

a fro

m s

choo

ls, t

each

ers,

stu

dent

s, p

ar-

ents

, vill

age

gove

rnm

ents

, and

com

mun

ities

in th

e ta

rget

ed v

illag

es.

The

base

line

surv

ey w

as c

ompl

eted

in N

ovem

ber 2

016

. Fin

ding

s fro

m th

e su

rvey

ar

e ou

tline

d in

the

Bas

elin

e Re

port.

The

Bas

elin

e Re

port

was

com

plet

ed in

Sep

-te

mbe

r 20

18. I

t is

expe

cted

the

repo

rt w

ill b

e di

ssem

inat

ed b

etw

een

Dec

embe

r 20

18 a

nd J

anua

ry 2

019

.

Com

plet

ed

85

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Ana

lytic

s - K

IAT

Gur

uA

naly

sis

of b

asel

ine,

m

onito

ring

and

lear

n-in

g da

ta o

n a

quar

terly

ba

sis,

to b

e pr

esen

ted

ever

y si

x m

onth

s to

the

Stee

ring

Com

mitt

ee.

Ana

lysi

s pl

an fo

r mon

i-to

ring

data

and

impa

ct

eval

uatio

n an

d w

orki

ng

pape

rs.

The

obje

ctiv

e of

this

KIA

T G

uru

activ

ity is

to a

naly

ze b

asel

ine,

mon

itorin

g, a

nd

lear

ning

dat

a an

d di

ssem

inat

e th

e re

port

to th

e St

eerin

g C

omm

ittee

eve

ry s

ix

mon

ths.

The

mon

itorin

g an

d le

arni

ng d

ata

was

ana

lyze

d on

a q

uarte

rly b

asis

and

us

ed to

upd

ate

proj

ect i

ndic

ator

s, w

hich

are

pre

sent

ed e

very

six

mon

ths

in th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

Stat

us a

nd R

esul

ts R

epor

t (IS

R).

In 2

018

, an

ISR

was

dev

elop

ed

in J

une

and

Nov

embe

r. Th

e N

ovem

ber I

SR w

as th

e la

st IS

R b

efor

e th

e pr

ojec

t cl

oses

on

Dec

embe

r 31,

2018

.

Com

plet

ed

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

qua

l-ita

tive

surv

ey a

nd p

oliti

-ca

l eco

nom

y an

alys

is.

Im

pact

Eva

luat

ion

Repo

rt.

The

purp

ose

of q

ualit

ativ

e su

rvey

and

pol

itica

l eco

nom

y an

alys

is is

to c

aptu

re

info

rmat

ion

that

is n

ot d

etec

ted

by th

e qu

antit

ativ

e su

rvey

and

to m

ap o

ut k

ey

acto

rs a

nd th

eir r

elat

ions

hips

. A m

idlin

e su

rvey

was

com

plet

ed in

Dec

embe

r 20

17.

The

qual

itativ

e su

rvey

and

pol

itica

l eco

nom

y an

alys

is w

as c

ompl

eted

in S

epte

m-

ber 2

018

. Ana

lysi

s an

d fin

ding

s fro

m th

e m

idlin

e su

rvey

and

qua

litat

ive

surv

ey

(incl

udin

g th

e po

litic

al e

cono

my

anal

ysis

) will

be

pres

ente

d in

the

Impa

ct E

valu

a-tio

n Re

port,

whi

ch is

exp

ecte

d to

be

final

ized

by

May

20

19.

On

Trac

k

Ana

lytic

s - K

IAT

Gur

uIm

plem

enta

tion

of e

nd

line

surv

ey.

Im

pact

Eva

luat

ion

Repo

rt.Th

e en

d lin

e su

rvey

aim

s to

gat

her d

ata

from

sch

ools

, tea

cher

s, s

tude

nts,

par

-en

ts, v

illag

e go

vern

men

ts, a

nd c

omm

uniti

es in

the

targ

eted

vill

ages

. The

end

line

su

rvey

was

com

plet

ed in

mid

-Apr

il 20

18. A

naly

sis

and

findi

ngs

from

the

end

line

surv

ey (a

long

with

the

base

line,

mid

line,

and

qua

litat

ive

surv

eys)

will

be

pres

ente

d in

the

Impa

ct E

valu

atio

n Re

port,

whi

ch is

exp

ecte

d to

be

final

ized

by

May

20

19.

On

Trac

k

Ana

lysi

s of

bas

elin

e,

mon

itorin

g an

d le

arni

ng,

and

end

line

data

.

A

naly

sis

plan

for i

mpa

ct

eval

uatio

n, w

orki

ng a

nd

publ

ishe

d pa

pers

.

The

obje

ctiv

e of

this

KIA

T G

uru

activ

ity is

to a

naly

ze b

asel

ine,

mon

itorin

g an

d le

arni

ng, a

nd e

nd li

ne d

ata.

It e

xpec

ted

that

afte

r im

plem

enta

tion

teac

her a

tten-

danc

e an

d se

rvic

e pe

rform

ance

will

incr

ease

in ta

rget

are

as.

Dat

a cl

eani

ng w

as c

ompl

eted

in th

e en

d of

May

20

18. E

arly

ana

lysi

s fro

m th

e im

pact

eva

luat

ion

foun

d th

at: (

1) G

roup

2 (c

omm

unity

em

pow

erm

ent a

nd p

aym

ent

of te

ache

r rem

ote

area

allo

wan

ce b

ased

on

teac

her p

rese

nce)

had

the

stro

nges

t eff

ects

on

stud

ent l

earn

ing

outc

omes

and

teac

her p

rese

nce;

and

(2) A

ll gr

oups

in

crea

sed

pare

ntal

effo

rts in

sup

porti

ng e

duca

tion.

The

se in

itial

find

ings

wer

e sh

ared

with

MoE

C, a

nd w

ith D

FAT,

in S

epte

mbe

r 20

18.

The

full

resu

lts o

f the

impa

ct e

valu

atio

n ar

e ex

pect

ed to

be

avai

labl

e by

the

end

of M

ay 2

019

. It i

s ex

pect

ed th

e re

sults

will

info

rm M

oEC

abo

ut p

erfo

rman

ce-b

ased

in

cent

ives

and

mec

hani

sms

to im

prov

e te

ache

r ser

vice

per

form

ance

; and

MoV

ab

out c

omm

unity

par

ticip

atio

n in

mon

itorin

g ba

sic

serv

ice

deliv

ery.

On

Trac

k

86

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Man

agin

g-fo

r-R

esul

ts

Man

agin

g-fo

r-

Resu

ltsPe

rform

ance

& E

xpen

di-

ture

Ass

essm

ents

.Su

ppor

t and

pol

icy

dia-

logu

e fo

r tag

ging

, and

bu

dget

and

exp

endi

ture

pe

rform

ance

repo

rting

.

Inpu

ts to

Gov

ernm

ent's

M

anua

l for

Tag

ging

, M

onito

ring

and

Eval

uat-

ing

Stun

ting

Bud

get a

nd

Expe

nditu

res.

Ove

r the

repo

rting

per

iod,

LSP

pro

vide

d te

chni

cal i

nput

s to

Bap

pena

s an

d M

oF

to in

form

the

prep

arat

ion

of th

e M

anua

l for

Stu

ntin

g B

udge

t Tag

ging

and

Per

for-

man

ce R

evie

w. T

he m

anua

l will

hel

p B

appe

nas,

DG

Bud

get,

and

the

Line

min

istry

to

iden

tify,

trac

k, m

onito

r and

eva

luat

e th

e st

untin

g re

duct

ion

rela

ted

budg

et a

nd

its p

erfo

rman

ce.

The

draf

t Man

ual w

as d

evel

oped

and

dis

cuss

ed in

inte

r-m

inis

-te

rial w

orks

hops

com

pris

ing

prim

arily

Bap

pena

s an

d M

oF, a

s w

ell a

s re

leva

nt li

ne

min

istri

es re

spon

sibl

e fo

r key

stu

ntin

g-re

late

d pr

ogra

ms.

A d

raft

was

revi

ewed

by

the

GoI

in a

cor

e te

chni

cal t

eam

wor

ksho

p on

Nov

embe

r 27,

20

18. T

he d

raft

was

revi

sed

and

shar

ed w

ith a

ll th

e st

akeh

olde

rs a

fter t

he D

G B

udge

t org

aniz

ed

mee

ting

on 4

Dec

embe

r 20

18. B

appe

nas

and

MoF

fina

lized

the

Man

ual o

n 28

D

ecem

ber 2

018

.

Com

plet

ed

Polic

y di

alog

ue a

nd in

-pu

ts to

GoI

's b

udge

t and

ex

pend

iture

per

form

ance

re

porti

ng, i

nclu

ding

kn

owle

dge

shar

ing

of in

-te

rnat

iona

l exp

erie

nces

.

LSP

will

initi

ate

polic

y di

alog

ue a

fter t

he M

anua

l is

final

ized

in D

ecem

ber 2

018

. Th

e kn

owle

dge

shar

ing

of in

tern

atio

nal p

ract

ices

, and

a tr

aini

ng s

essi

on, w

ill

be c

ondu

cted

in th

e se

cond

wee

k of

Jan

uary

20

19. T

he tr

aini

ng m

ater

ials

are

cu

rren

tly b

eing

pre

pare

d.

Prep

arat

ion

Subn

atio

nal S

tunt

ing

Publ

ic E

xpen

ditu

re

Revi

ew (P

ER).

Subn

atio

nal S

tunt

ing

PER

Re

port

Inst

rum

ent (

ques

tion-

naire

) for

fiel

d su

rvey

an

d FG

D in

6 s

ampl

ed

dist

ricts

.Su

rvey

fiel

d re

port.

Firs

t dra

ft of

repo

rt.

LSP

is c

ondu

ctin

g an

alys

is o

f sub

natio

nal s

pend

ing

on s

tunt

ing

inte

rven

tions

. The

fir

st d

raft

of th

e su

rvey

inst

rum

ents

was

pre

pare

d an

d te

sted

in th

e pi

lot d

istri

ct

(Sle

man

Dis

trict

). Th

e W

orld

Ban

k Te

am re

view

ed a

revi

sed

vers

ion

of th

e in

stru

-m

ents

bef

ore

the

actu

al s

urve

y to

ok p

lace

in D

ecem

ber 2

018

.

The

SMER

U fi

eld

team

com

men

ced

seco

ndar

y da

ta c

olle

ctio

n, in

clud

ing

deve

l-op

men

t pla

nnin

g do

cum

ent,

sect

or s

trate

gic

docu

men

t, an

d bu

dget

dat

a.

On

Trac

k

DA

K s

yste

ms

and

advi

ce.

Inpu

ts to

Gov

ernm

ent’s

po

licy

on D

AK

for s

tunt

-in

g.

This

act

ivity

pro

vide

s te

chni

cal a

dvic

e an

d an

alys

is o

n le

vera

ging

the

use

of D

AK

to

impr

ove

stun

ting

inte

rven

tion

cove

rage

at t

he d

istri

ct le

vel.

It w

ill a

chie

ve th

is

obje

ctiv

e th

roug

h th

e is

suan

ce o

f a re

gula

tory

fram

ewor

k to

impr

ove

plan

ning

an

d im

plem

enta

tion

of D

AK

, and

gra

dual

ly im

prov

e D

AK

pol

icy

to p

rovi

de b

ette

r in

cent

ive

for a

chie

ving

stu

ntin

g co

nver

genc

e

Bet

wee

n A

pril

to J

uly

2018

, LSP

pro

vide

d te

chni

cal i

nput

s to

MoF

on

the

desi

gn

of D

AK

for s

tunt

ing

thro

ugh

cond

uctin

g pi

lots

in 5

dis

trict

s. L

esso

ns le

arne

d fro

m

thes

e pi

lots

wer

e pr

esen

ted

to a

n in

ter-

min

iste

rial w

orki

ng g

roup

on

Oct

ober

22,

20

18, w

hich

incl

udes

MoF

, Bap

pena

s, M

inis

try o

f Hea

lth, a

nd M

inis

try o

f Pub

lic

Wor

ks.

On

Trac

k

87

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Man

agin

g-fo

r-

Resu

ltsD

urin

g O

ctob

er 2

018

, LSP

sup

porte

d w

orks

hops

on

the

GoI

’s d

raft

Perp

res

on

DA

K fo

r stu

ntin

g, a

nd p

rovi

ded

advi

se to

revi

se th

e de

taile

d re

gula

tions

and

tech

-ni

cal g

uide

lines

. The

ens

uing

dis

cuss

ion

sugg

ests

that

the

appr

opria

te re

gula

tion

for l

ever

agin

g D

AK

, to

impr

ove

stun

ting

inte

rven

tion

conv

erge

nce,

wou

ld b

e a

MoF

regu

latio

n (P

MK

), w

hile

ove

rall

leve

l stra

tegi

c gu

idan

ce’s

will

be

regu

late

d th

roug

h a

Perp

res

on N

atio

nal S

trate

gy fo

r Stu

ntin

g Re

duct

ion.

The

dra

ft PM

K is

ne

arin

g co

mpl

etio

n an

d ex

pect

ed to

be

issu

ed in

the

end

of F

ebru

ary

2019

.

Tech

nica

l Ass

ista

nce

to

Dis

trict

s.Pr

ovis

ion

of T

rans

ition

al

TA P

ool a

nd q

ualit

y su

ppor

t to

capa

city

de-

velo

pmen

t del

iver

y.

Inpu

ts to

G

over

nmen

t's D

istri

ct

Con

verg

ence

Pro

gram

G

uide

lines

and

Cap

acity

B

uild

ing

appr

oach

es.

Dur

ing

the

perio

d fro

m J

une

to N

ovem

ber 2

018

, LSP

pro

vide

d te

chni

cal i

nput

s to

B

appe

nas

and

MoH

A o

n th

e pr

epar

atio

n of

the

Impl

emen

tatio

n M

anua

l (Pe

-do

man

Pel

aksa

naan

/Ped

um) a

nd T

echn

ical

Gui

delin

es (P

etun

juk

Tekn

is/J

ukni

s)

for D

istri

ct G

over

nmen

ts to

impl

emen

t Con

verg

ence

Act

ions

. The

man

ual a

nd

guid

elin

es w

ere

prov

ided

to th

e 10

0 P

riorit

y D

istri

cts

that

atte

nded

the

Stun

ting

Sum

mit

orga

nize

d by

SoV

P in

Nov

embe

r 20

18.

The

Tran

sitio

nal T

echn

ical

Ass

ista

nce

(TA

) Poo

l was

est

ablis

hed,

and

orie

ntat

ion

was

con

duct

ed, i

n m

id-O

ctob

er 2

018

. The

nat

iona

l tea

m is

in M

oHA’

s D

G B

angd

a,

and

regi

onal

team

s w

ere

depl

oyed

to 8

Pro

vinc

ial G

over

nmen

ts b

y th

e en

d of

O

ctob

er to

sup

port

Dis

trict

Gov

ernm

ents

in im

plem

entin

g co

nver

genc

e ac

tions

: su

ch a

s st

untin

g su

mm

its, d

iagn

ostic

s an

d ac

tion

plan

dev

elop

men

t. Th

e re

gion

al

team

s ar

e co

-loca

ted

in th

e Pr

ovin

cial

Bap

peda

.

In N

ovem

ber 2

018

, LSP

sup

porte

d M

oHA

to o

rgan

ize

and

faci

litat

e a

half-

day

sess

ion

for M

oHA

and

the

TA p

ool,

as p

art o

f the

Stu

ntin

g Su

mm

it. T

he s

essi

on

targ

eted

Pro

vinc

ial B

appe

da a

nd p

rovi

ded

addi

tiona

l inf

orm

atio

n on

the

role

of

prov

ince

s in

sup

porti

ng d

istri

ct g

over

nmen

ts to

impl

emen

t con

verg

ence

act

ions

.

On

Trac

k

Ana

lytic

s an

d ad

vice

on

cap

acity

bui

ldin

g ap

proa

ches

, inc

ludi

ng

adap

tive

lear

ning

.

LSP

prov

ided

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

to d

evel

op th

e co

nten

t for

cap

acity

bui

ldin

g m

ater

ials

for p

rovi

ncia

l and

dis

trict

gov

ernm

ents

. LSP

als

o in

itiat

ed th

e de

velo

p-m

ent o

f e-le

arni

ng to

sup

port

dist

rict g

over

nmen

ts to

impl

emen

t con

verg

ence

ac

tions

.

On

Trac

k

Dev

elop

men

t of t

ools

an

d tra

inin

g fo

r dat

a sy

stem

s TA

.

MoH

A is

est

ablis

hing

a s

yste

m fo

r dis

trict

gov

ernm

ents

to p

rese

nt a

nnua

l res

ults

in

term

s of

impr

ovem

ent i

n co

nver

genc

e an

d pe

rform

ance

, whi

ch w

ill b

e ev

alu-

ated

by

prov

ince

s. D

urin

g th

e re

porti

ng p

erio

d, L

SP p

rovi

ded

tech

nica

l inp

uts

to

Bap

pena

s an

d M

oHA

to d

esig

n ho

w to

ass

ess

perfo

rman

ce o

f dis

trict

gov

ern-

men

ts in

impl

emen

ting

conv

erge

nce

prog

ram

act

ions

.

On

Trac

k

88

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Man

agin

g-fo

r-

Resu

ltsSu

ppor

t to

Des

ign

&

Impl

emen

t Per

form

ance

A

sses

smen

t.

Inpu

ts to

des

ign

of p

er-

form

ance

ass

essm

ent f

or

dist

rict g

over

nmen

ts to

be

dep

loye

d by

MoH

A

thro

ugh

prov

inci

al g

ov-

ernm

ents

.

This

act

ivity

pro

vide

s te

chni

cal a

dvic

e an

d an

alys

is to

DG

Reg

iona

l Dev

elop

men

t (B

angd

a) o

n ho

w to

des

ign

and

impl

emen

t an

asse

ssm

ent o

f dis

trict

in im

prov

ing

conv

erge

nce

of in

terv

entio

ns. T

he p

erfo

rman

ce a

sses

smen

t is

inte

nded

to in

cen-

tiviz

e di

stric

ts in

mob

ilizi

ng th

eir e

ffort

to im

prov

e in

terv

entio

n co

nver

genc

e.D

urin

g th

e re

porti

ng p

erio

d, L

SP p

rovi

ded

tech

nica

l inp

uts

to B

appe

nas

and

MoH

A to

des

ign

how

to a

sses

s pe

rform

ance

of d

istri

ct g

over

nmen

ts in

impl

e-m

entin

g th

e co

nver

genc

e pr

ogra

m a

ctio

ns. M

oHA

is e

stab

lishi

ng a

sys

tem

for

dist

rict g

over

nmen

ts to

pre

sent

ann

ual r

esul

ts in

term

s of

impr

ovem

ent i

n co

nver

-ge

nce

and

perfo

rman

ce, w

hich

will

be

eval

uate

d by

pro

vinc

es.

On

Trac

k

Nat

iona

l Pol

icy

Dia

logu

e on

Dat

a M

anag

emen

t an

d Pe

rform

ance

Tr

acki

ng.

Stun

ting

data

sys

tem

s as

sess

men

t stu

dy.

Ass

essm

ent o

f di

stric

t dat

a sy

stem

s fo

r st

untin

g.

LSP

is d

evel

opin

g a

draf

t TO

R fo

r a s

tunt

ing

data

sys

tem

s as

sess

men

t stu

dy.

Prep

arat

ion

Cro

ss-c

uttin

g Re

sults

M

onito

ring.

Inst

itutio

nal D

evel

op-

men

t for

Res

ults

M

onito

ring.

Inpu

ts to

the

Stra

nas

M&

E M

anua

l, de

-si

gn o

f res

ults

mon

itorin

g da

shbo

ard.

This

act

ivity

aim

s to

sup

port

to th

e So

VP

to e

stab

lish

a re

sults

’ mon

itorin

g an

d de

bottl

enec

king

sys

tem

for t

he N

atio

nal S

trate

gy fo

r Stu

ntin

g Pr

even

tion.

To d

ate,

LSP

has

dev

elop

ed a

dra

ft w

ork

plan

with

the

SoV

P’s

Resu

lts M

onito

ring

Team

Lea

der.

A te

chni

cal s

uppo

rt m

issi

on is

pla

nned

in J

anua

ry 2

019

to in

form

th

e de

velo

pmen

t of R

esul

ts F

ram

ewor

k an

d M

&E

Man

ual f

or th

e N

atSt

rat S

tunt

-in

g.

On

Trac

k

Mon

itorin

g Sy

stem

s A

sses

smen

t.A

sses

smen

t of M

&E

syst

ems

in K

/L.

A te

chni

cal s

upp

ort

mis

sio

n is

pla

nne

d fo

r Ja

nuar

y 2

019

to in

itiat

e th

e a

sse

ss-

me

nt w

ith S

oVP

and

re

leva

nt li

ne m

inis

trie

s.

Pre

par

atio

n

Polic

y D

ialo

gue

on

Prog

ram

Per

form

ance

m

onito

ring.

Inpu

ts o

n pr

ogra

m p

erfo

r-m

ance

mon

itorin

g.Th

is a

ctiv

ity is

stil

l in

prep

arat

ion

stag

e.Pr

epar

atio

n

MEL

AYA

NI

MEL

AYA

NI

Col

lect

ion

of b

asel

ine

data

.

Bas

elin

e re

port.

Each

pilo

t dis

trict

s co

mpl

eted

a b

asel

ine

repo

rt. F

or e

ach

loca

tion,

the

repo

rt

incl

udes

info

rmat

ion

abou

t the

loca

l gov

ernm

ent,

thei

r abi

lity

to id

entif

y an

d un

-de

rsta

nd p

robl

ems,

the

polit

ical

eco

nom

y, m

ain

prio

rity

activ

ities

, and

sta

keho

lder

m

appi

ng.

Com

plet

ed

Agr

ee o

n pr

oble

m to

be

solv

ed.

Pr

oble

m id

entifi

ed a

nd

chos

en b

y th

e lo

cal g

ov-

ernm

ent.

LSP

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

(i.e.

, coa

ches

) fac

ilita

ted

wor

ksho

ps in

Bel

u, B

ojon

egor

o,

and

Kubu

Ray

a to

hel

p th

e lo

cal g

over

nmen

t ide

ntify

and

cho

ose

a pr

oble

m to

ad

dres

s. In

Boj

oneg

oro,

hig

h in

fant

mor

talit

y w

as in

itial

ly s

elec

ted,

yet

late

r re-

vise

d to

hea

lthca

re q

ualit

y. In

Bel

u, p

oor q

ualit

y pr

imar

y/se

cond

ary

educ

atio

n w

as

sele

cted

. In

Kubu

Ray

a, ri

sing

leve

ls o

f stu

ntin

g w

as s

elec

ted.

Com

plet

ed

89

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

MEL

AYA

NI

Form

atio

n of

pro

blem

so

lvin

g te

am.

D

istri

ct p

robl

em s

olvi

ng

team

est

ablis

hed.

LSP

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

(i.e.

, coa

ches

) ass

iste

d th

e lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts in

volv

ed

to d

evel

op p

robl

em s

olvi

ng te

ams

in a

ll pi

lot l

ocat

ions

. The

se te

ams

wer

e ei

ther

fo

rmed

form

ally

(i.e

., re

gula

ted

thro

ugh

a B

upat

i Dec

ree)

or i

nfor

mal

ly (w

ithou

t a

regu

latio

n) d

epen

ding

on

the

loca

l gov

ernm

ent's

pre

fere

nce.

By

Febr

uary

20

18,

all l

ocal

gov

ernm

ents

had

est

ablis

hed

the

prob

lem

-sol

ving

team

s. In

Kub

u Ra

ya,

the

team

form

atio

n w

as s

uppo

rted

by a

Bup

ati D

ecre

e.

How

ever

, in

Boj

oneg

oro

and

Bel

u, th

e te

am’s

form

atio

n w

as n

ot.

Com

plet

ed

Prob

lem

ana

lysi

s —

initi

al.

Pr

oble

m a

naly

sis

con-

duct

ed.

In a

ll lo

catio

ns, L

SP-s

uppo

rted

coac

hes

faci

litat

ed m

ultip

le ro

unds

of fi

shbo

ne

anal

ysis

and

bas

ic a

naly

sis.

Giv

en th

e cy

clic

al n

atur

e of

PD

IA, t

he p

robl

em-s

olvi

ng

team

s w

ill c

ontin

ue to

exp

lore

mor

e de

taile

d an

alys

is a

s re

quire

d. B

logs

/not

es

desc

ribin

g th

e in

itial

pro

blem

ana

lysi

s pr

oces

s ar

e av

aila

ble

on th

e LS

P w

ebsi

te.

Com

plet

ed

Prob

lem

ana

lysi

s —

de

taile

d.

Add

ition

al "r

esea

rch"

un-

derta

ken

to e

xpan

d un

-de

rsta

ndin

g of

pro

blem

.

Dur

ing

the

repo

rting

per

iod,

the

LSP-

supp

orte

d co

ache

s su

ppor

ted

the

prob

-le

m-s

olvi

ng te

ams

to u

nder

take

mor

e de

taile

d pr

oble

m a

naly

sis.

In B

elu,

the

team

de

velo

ped

an in

stru

men

t for

sch

ool c

onsu

ltatio

ns th

roug

h an

iter

ativ

e pr

oces

s.

To in

form

the

mor

e de

taile

d an

alys

is, t

he B

elu

prob

lem

sol

ving

team

con

duct

ed

inte

rvie

ws/

disc

ussi

ons

at s

ix s

choo

ls (i

n A

ugus

t 20

18) a

nd h

eld

mee

tings

with

the

head

mas

ter,

pare

nts,

and

six

th-g

rade

teac

hers

to fo

rm a

wor

king

gro

up (i

n O

cto-

ber 2

018

). In

Kub

u Ra

ya, t

he p

robl

em-s

olvi

ng te

am c

ondu

cted

vill

age

visi

ts in

four

lo

catio

ns, d

urin

g A

ugus

t 20

18, t

o pr

ovid

e in

sigh

ts o

n vi

llage

-leve

l iss

ues

rela

ted

to E

CED

ser

vice

s (P

AU

D),

and

wat

er p

lann

ing/

budg

etin

g an

d im

plem

enta

tion.

In

Boj

oneg

oro,

the

prob

lem

-sol

ving

team

und

erto

ok a

mor

e de

taile

d re

view

of t

he

mat

erna

l aud

it (A

ugus

t 20

18),

heal

th p

erso

nnel

rota

tion

polic

y (s

peci

fical

ly fo

r doc

-to

rs a

nd m

idw

ives

trai

ned

in b

asic

obs

tetri

c em

erge

ncy

and

neon

atal

car

e), a

nd

the

avai

labi

lity

of e

quip

men

t in

heal

th c

ente

rs (S

epte

mbe

r 20

18).

Com

plet

ed

Dev

elop

ing

solu

tions

.

Iden

tifica

tion/

dev

elop

-m

ent o

f sol

utio

ns.

In B

ojon

egor

o, o

ver S

epte

mbe

r to

Oct

ober

20

18 th

e pr

oble

m s

olvi

ng te

am, w

ith

supp

ort f

rom

the

LSP

coac

h, id

entifi

ed p

oten

tial k

ey a

reas

/sol

utio

ns, i

nclu

ding

: en

surin

g th

at a

ll m

idw

ives

and

doc

tors

in h

ealth

cen

ters

(Pus

kesm

as) r

ecei

ve

obst

etric

and

neo

nata

l em

erge

ncy

train

ing

(PG

DO

N);

iden

tifyi

ng n

ew w

ays

to

supp

ort/i

ncen

tiviz

e m

idw

ives

(e.g

., no

mor

e pu

nish

men

ts);

and

impr

ovin

g he

alth

bu

dget

ing

proc

esse

s (e

.g.,

prio

ritiz

ing

and

mai

nstre

amin

g m

ater

nal h

ealth

bud

get

into

the

over

all h

ealth

bud

get).

Ove

r the

sam

e pe

riod,

in B

elu,

the

loca

l pro

b-le

m-s

olvi

ng te

am o

rgan

ized

a d

iscu

ssio

n w

ith s

ever

al te

ache

r stu

dy g

roup

s an

d sc

hool

com

mitt

ees

to p

rese

nt th

e fin

ding

s fro

m th

eir e

duca

tion

qual

ity d

iagn

ostic

.

Com

plet

ed

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

90

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

MEL

AYA

NI

The

feed

back

they

rece

ived

con

firm

ed th

e fin

ding

s of

the

diag

nost

ic, a

nd th

e th

ree

grou

ps id

entifi

ed p

riorit

y so

lutio

ns, i

nclu

ding

impr

ovin

g m

anag

emen

t ca-

paci

ty o

f the

sch

ool p

rinci

pal,

rolli

ng o

ut c

urric

ulum

20

13, a

nd im

prov

ing

pare

nts’

pa

rtici

patio

n. In

Kub

u Ra

ya, t

he d

istri

ct p

robl

em s

olvi

ng te

am d

id n

ot u

nder

take

th

e de

velo

ping

sol

utio

ns a

ctiv

ities

(rel

ated

to s

tunt

ing

data

ana

lysi

s) a

s or

igin

ally

pl

anne

d, d

ue to

lim

ited

polit

ical

com

mitm

ent a

t the

dis

trict

leve

l. In

stea

d, th

e te

am

focu

sed

on a

ddre

ssin

g th

e lim

ited

ECED

(PA

UD

) ser

vice

s in

the

dist

rict’s

vill

ag-

es. T

he te

am, w

ith fa

cilit

atio

n su

ppor

t fro

m th

e LS

P-su

ppor

ted

coac

h, id

entifi

ed

a so

lutio

n th

at a

imed

to e

stab

lish

“one

PA

UD

, one

vill

age”

in K

ubu

Raya

. The

te

am w

as a

lso

able

to o

btai

n su

ppor

t fro

m th

e V

illag

e C

omm

unity

Em

pow

erm

ent

Dis

trict

Offi

ce (D

inas

Pem

berd

ayaa

n M

asya

raka

t Des

a, o

r Din

as P

MD

) and

the

Educ

atio

n D

istri

ct O

ffice

(Din

as P

endi

dika

n) fo

r the

initi

ativ

e.

Impl

emen

ting

solu

tions

.

Key

step

s ta

ken

to im

ple-

men

t cho

sen

solu

tions

. A

s of

Dec

embe

r 20

18, t

he B

ojon

egor

o pr

oble

m s

olvi

ng te

am, w

ith s

uppo

rt fro

m

the

LSP-

supp

orte

d co

ach,

had

com

men

ced:

dra

fting

the

refe

rral

gui

delin

es,

prep

arin

g an

d up

grad

ing

the

emer

genc

y ro

om (i

nclu

ding

equ

ipm

ent)

in h

ealth

ce

nter

s, a

nd e

nsur

ing

man

dato

ry m

ains

tream

ing

of th

e m

ater

nal h

ealth

bud

-ge

t (re

quire

d by

all

units

in th

e he

alth

age

ncy)

. The

coa

ch in

Boj

oneg

oro

also

su

ppor

ted

the

dist

rict t

o se

t up

a m

ulti-

sect

oral

pro

blem

-sol

ving

team

for m

ater

-na

l and

neo

nata

l hea

lth is

sues

, whi

ch w

ill b

e re

spon

sibl

e fo

r tak

ing

som

e of

the

wor

k fo

rwar

d af

ter t

he p

ilot c

oncl

udes

. As

of D

ecem

ber,

the

Bel

u pr

oble

m s

olvi

ng

team

(with

sup

port

for t

he L

SP-s

uppo

rted

coac

h) fa

cilit

ated

effo

rts to

revi

taliz

e th

e sc

hool

com

mitt

ee b

y sh

arin

g th

e le

gal c

harte

r of a

rela

tivel

y su

cces

sful

sch

ool

com

mitt

ee to

oth

er s

choo

ls. T

he E

duca

tion

Dis

trict

Offi

ce a

lso

orga

nize

d tra

inin

g to

roll

out t

he c

urric

ulum

20

13. A

s of

Dec

embe

r, in

Kub

u Ra

ya, t

he D

inas

PM

D

supp

orte

d th

e Ku

bu R

aya

Dis

trict

to e

ncou

rage

vill

age

gove

rnm

ents

to in

clud

e EC

ED (P

AU

D) s

ervi

ces

in th

eir v

illag

e bu

dget

s (A

PBD

es) u

sing

vill

age

fund

s. In

ad

ditio

n, th

e Ed

ucat

ion

Dis

trict

Offi

ce s

uppo

rted

the

dist

rict t

o is

sue

a lic

ense

for

esta

blis

hing

PA

UD

faci

litie

s.

On

Trac

k

Refin

ing

solu

tions

.

Cha

nges

mad

e to

sol

u-tio

ns.

In M

arch

20

18, t

he te

am in

Boj

oneg

oro

asse

ssed

the

train

ing

for m

idw

ives

, an

d de

term

ined

that

the

train

ing

did

not a

dequ

atel

y co

ver n

eo-n

atal

nee

ds.

The

train

ing

was

mod

ified

to in

clud

e m

ore

neo-

nata

l con

tent

(N.B

., th

is w

as a

n ad

just

men

t fro

m p

revi

ous

prog

ram

min

g). I

n B

elu

and

Kubu

Ray

a, th

is p

roce

ss

has

not c

omm

ence

d, a

nd th

e te

ams

are

not y

et re

finin

g th

e so

lutio

ns. I

n B

elu,

th

is is

larg

ely

beca

use

the

who

le it

erat

ive

proc

ess

took

long

er th

an e

xpec

ted.

M

eanw

hile

in K

ubu

Raya

, thi

s is

larg

ely

due

to c

halle

nges

with

obt

aini

ng o

ngoi

ng

polit

ical

com

mitm

ent.

On

Trac

k

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

91

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

MEL

AYA

NI

Inte

grat

ing

proc

esse

s.

Lo

cal G

over

nmen

t spe

cific

ad

apta

tions

of M

ELAY

AN

I. In

Boj

oneg

oro,

the

team

, with

sup

port

from

the

LSP-

supp

orte

d co

ach,

set

up

the

Mul

ti-Se

ctor

al D

istri

ct P

robl

em-S

olvi

ng T

eam

, whi

ch w

ill b

e re

spon

sibl

e fo

r ma-

tern

al a

nd n

eo-n

atal

pro

blem

sol

ving

in th

e fu

ture

, onc

e th

e pi

lot c

oncl

udes

and

th

e LS

P-su

ppor

ted

coac

hes

have

fini

shed

. In

Dec

embe

r 20

18, B

ojon

egor

o di

stric

t he

ld a

wor

ksho

p to

form

ally

laun

ch th

is n

ew te

am. I

n B

elu,

tool

s de

velo

ped

by

the

team

are

bei

ng s

hare

d w

ith B

appe

da fo

r pot

entia

l mod

ifica

tion

for u

se in

ot

her s

ecto

rs. K

ubu

Raya

is n

ot u

nder

taki

ng th

is a

ctiv

ity

On

Trac

k

VIP

VIP

Proj

ect r

estru

ctur

ing

and

VIP

pre

para

tion

(IBR

D O

pera

tion)

.

Recr

uitm

ent o

f na

tiona

l, pr

ovin

cial

, di

stric

t, an

d vi

llage

co

nsul

tant

s (T

A).

• 24

Nat

iona

l Vill

age

Inno

va-

tion

Prog

ram

Con

sulta

nts.

• 24

Sec

reta

riat C

onsu

ltant

s.•

47 V

illag

e C

omm

unity

em

-po

wer

men

t and

dev

elop

-m

ent c

onsu

ltant

s.•

363

Prov

inci

al C

onsu

ltant

s on

the

Vill

age

Com

mun

ity

Empo

wer

men

t Pro

gram

.•

2,53

2 TA

Dis

trict

-leve

l V

illag

e C

omm

unity

Em

pow

-er

men

t Fac

ilita

tors

(Ten

aga

ahli

pem

berd

ayaa

n m

as-

yara

kat d

esa

or T

APM

D).

• 16

,493

Vill

age

Empo

wer

-m

ent F

acili

tato

rs (p

en-

dam

ping

des

a pe

mbe

r-da

yaan

or P

DP)

and

Vill

age

Infra

stru

ctur

e En

gine

erin

g Fa

cilit

ator

s (p

enda

mpi

ng

desa

tekn

ik in

frast

rukt

ur o

r PD

TI).

• 21

,117

Vill

age

Faci

litat

ors

(PLD

) (1 f

acili

tato

r for

3-4

vi

llage

s).

As

of N

ovem

ber 2

018

, VIP

recr

uite

d 12

of 2

4 N

atio

nal V

illag

e In

nova

tion

Prog

ram

(V

IP) C

onsu

ltant

s. T

wo

addi

tiona

l con

sulta

nts

(Tea

m L

eade

r and

an

Expe

rt C

onsu

l-ta

nt) w

ere

also

recr

uite

d bu

t hav

e si

nce

resi

gned

. In

2018

, the

targ

et V

IP C

on-

sulta

nts

targ

et w

as in

crea

sed

from

16 to

24

due

to M

oV’s

add

ition

al n

eeds

(e.g

., ca

ptur

ing

inno

vatio

n ex

pert,

hea

lth fa

cilit

y in

nova

tion

expe

rts, a

nd T

SP e

xper

ts).

At t

he n

atio

nal l

evel

, VIP

als

o re

crui

ted

19 o

f 24

Secr

etar

iat C

onsu

ltant

s, a

nd 4

5 of

47

Vill

age

Com

mun

ity E

mpo

wer

men

t and

Dev

elop

men

t Con

sulta

nts.

VIP

als

o re

crui

ted:

• 34

3 ou

t of 3

63 (9

7%) P

rovi

ncia

l Con

sulta

nts

on th

e V

illag

e C

omm

unity

Em

pow

-er

men

t Pro

gram

. •

2,48

4 of

2,5

32 (9

7%) D

istri

ct-le

vel V

illag

e C

omm

unity

Em

pow

erm

ent F

acili

tato

rs

• 15

,30

5 of

16,4

93 (9

6%) S

ub-d

istri

ct F

acili

tato

rs o

n V

illag

e Em

pow

erm

ent a

nd

Vill

age

Infra

stru

ctur

e Fa

cilit

ator

s•

19,8

51 o

f 21,1

17 (9

3%) V

illag

e Fa

cilit

ator

sIn

tota

l, 38

,059

of 4

0,60

0 (9

4%) v

illag

e fa

cilit

ator

s (fr

om th

e na

tiona

l to

villa

ge

leve

l) w

ere

recr

uite

d.

To a

ccel

erat

e th

e re

crui

tmen

t pro

cess

(esp

ecia

lly fo

r Nat

iona

l VIP

con

sulta

nts)

, LS

P hi

ghlig

hted

this

issu

e in

the

Aid

e M

emoi

re (N

ovem

ber 2

018

), to

enc

oura

ge

MoV

to s

peed

up

the

proc

ess.

On

Trac

k

VIP

trai

ning

mod

ules

fin

aliz

atio

n.V

IP T

rain

ing

mod

ules

for N

a-tio

nal C

onsu

ltant

s, P

rovi

ncia

l C

onsu

ltant

s, a

nd D

istri

ct a

nd

Vill

age

Faci

litat

ors.

The

mod

ules

aim

to im

prov

e th

e ca

paci

ty o

f TA

, and

faci

litat

ors,

to fa

cilit

ate

VIP

im

plem

enta

tion.

The

mod

ules

will

pro

vide

faci

litat

ors

with

an

over

view

of t

he V

IP

conc

ept a

nd g

uida

nce

on h

ow to

impl

emen

t the

pro

gram

at d

iffer

ent l

evel

s.

Com

plet

ed

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

92

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

VIP

The

first

dra

ft of

the

acce

lera

tion

and

regu

lar V

IP tr

aini

ng m

odul

es w

as d

evel

-op

ed, a

nd a

wor

ksho

p to

fina

lize

the

mod

ules

was

hel

d on

16-2

1 Mar

ch 2

018

. LSP

su

ppor

ted

MoV

to re

view

the

train

ing

mod

ules

and

faci

litat

ed th

e w

orks

hop

to

final

ize

the

mod

ules

.

VIP

Tra

inin

g im

plem

en-

tatio

n.A

ll re

crui

ted

VIP

Fac

ilita

-to

r rec

eive

d tra

inin

g of

V

IP.

This

act

ivity

aim

s to

trai

n th

e V

IP fa

cilit

ator

s on

the

proj

ect's

con

cept

and

thei

r ro

les

and

resp

onsi

bilit

ies.

Dur

ing

the

first

hal

f of 2

018

, thi

s ac

tivity

was

del

ayed

du

e to

MoV

bud

getin

g an

d w

ork

plan

ning

del

ays.

Afte

r the

Min

ster

of V

illag

es

appr

oved

the

revi

sed

VIP

Impl

emen

tatio

n G

uide

lines

(Jun

e 1,

20

18),

the

VIP

pr

ogra

m c

ontin

ued

to im

plem

ent t

he a

ctiv

ity.

In e

arly

Jul

y 2

018

(1-8

Jul

y), 3

24

(89

% o

f tar

get)

Trai

ners

for V

illag

e C

omm

unity

Em

pow

erm

ent E

xper

t Sta

ff w

ere

trai

ned

in J

akar

ta. I

n ad

ditio

n, a

s of

31 D

ecem

-be

r 20

18, 2

,484

Dis

tric

t-Lev

el F

acili

tato

rs (1

7 pe

rcen

t fem

ale

and

83 p

erce

nt

mal

es);

15,3

05

Sub

-Dis

tric

t-Fac

ilita

tors

for V

illag

e Em

pow

erm

ent a

nd V

illag

e In

frast

ruct

ure

Engi

neer

s (2

3 pe

rcen

t fem

ale

and

77 p

erce

nt m

ale)

; and

19,8

51

Vill

age

Faci

litat

ors

(24

perc

ent f

emal

e an

d 76

per

cent

mal

e), w

ere

trai

ned.

LSP

mon

itore

d an

d su

perv

ised

MoV

-led

trai

ning

. LS

P vi

site

d al

l tra

inin

g in

Ja

kart

a. F

rom

Aug

ust t

o S

epte

mbe

r 20

18, L

SP

also

vis

ited

seve

ral p

rovi

nces

to

supe

rvis

e th

e D

istr

ict-L

evel

Fac

ilita

tor (

TAPM

) tra

inin

g, in

clud

ing

in N

TT, R

iau,

and

Pa

pua.

Com

plet

ed

Vill

age

Inno

vatio

n G

rant

(V

IG) (

IBR

D O

pera

tion)

.Es

tab

lish

dis

tric

t inn

o-

vatio

n te

am (T

IK o

r T

im

Ino

vasi

Ka

bup

ate

n)

and

vill

age

em

po

we

r-m

ent

and

inno

vatio

n te

am (T

PID

or

Tim

In

ova

si D

an

Pem

be

r-d

aya

an

De

sa)

All

434

dist

ricts

hav

e di

stric

t inn

ovat

ion

team

s,

and

6446

sub

dis

trict

s ha

ve v

illag

e em

pow

-er

men

t and

inno

vatio

n te

ams.

Eac

h te

am c

on-

sist

s of

5 to

7 m

embe

rs.

As

of N

ovem

ber 2

018

, all

434

(100

%) d

istri

cts

have

est

ablis

hed

Dis

trict

Inno

vatio

n Te

ams;

sig

ned

the

requ

ired

MoU

and

issu

ed a

Bup

ati D

ecis

ion

Lette

r (SK

Bup

ati).

M

eanw

hile

, 6,2

85 (9

8%) o

f sub

-dis

trict

s ha

ve e

stab

lishe

d V

illag

e Em

pow

erm

ent

and

Inno

vatio

n Te

ams;

sig

ned

the

requ

ired

MoU

; and

issu

ed a

Sub

-Dis

trict

Hea

d D

ecis

ion

Lette

r (SK

Cam

at).

Com

plet

ed

Bur

sa In

ova

si D

esa

(V

illag

e In

nova

tion

Exch

ang

e, o

r B

ID).

434

dis

tric

ts im

ple

me

nt-

ed

BID

in 2

018

.B

ID o

rgan

izes

vill

age

inno

vatio

n fa

irs to

insp

ire v

illag

e co

mm

uniti

es to

mak

e m

ore

info

rmed

dec

isio

ns o

n vi

llage

bud

get a

lloca

tions

. BID

is u

sed

as a

med

ium

for

know

ledg

e ex

chan

ge o

f inn

ovat

ions

.

Up

until

Dec

embe

r 31,

2018

, 98%

(426

of 4

34) d

istri

cts

have

impl

emen

ted

the

2018

Bur

sa In

ovas

i Des

a (B

ID).

The

tota

l num

ber o

f Vill

ages

that

par

ticip

ated

in

BID

are

71,0

24 V

illag

es (9

5%).

Ther

e w

ere

appr

oxim

atel

y 17

6,0

00

par

ticip

ants

of

BID

(74%

mal

e an

d 26

% fe

mal

e). T

he B

ID re

sulte

d in

69,

786

com

mitm

ent c

ards

an

d 29

,829

idea

car

ds. T

hese

com

mitm

ents

and

idea

car

ds w

ill b

e us

ed b

y vi

llage

s as

a b

asis

to re

plic

ate

activ

ities

in v

illag

e pl

anni

ng a

nd b

udge

ting

Dat

a fro

m J

une

2018

sho

ws

that

42%

(3,9

96 o

f 9,5

63) o

f the

sur

veye

d vi

llage

s th

at p

artic

ipat

ed in

BID

in 2

017

hav

e si

nce

repl

icat

ed in

nova

tion

activ

ities

from

B

ID u

sing

thei

r ow

n vi

llage

bud

gets

(APB

Des

) (in

tota

l, 32

,781

vill

ages

from

236

di

stric

ts p

artic

ipat

ed in

BID

in 2

017

).

On

Trac

k

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

93

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

VIP

Trai

ning

for d

istri

ct in

no-

vatio

n te

ams

and

villa

ge

empo

wer

men

t and

inno

-va

tion

team

s.

All

434

dist

ricts

inno

va-

tion

team

s, a

nd 6

446

vi

llage

em

pow

erm

ent

and

inno

vatio

n te

ams,

re

ceiv

ed tr

aini

ng.

Targ

et p

artic

ipan

ts: 5

par

-tic

ipan

ts fo

r eac

h di

stric

t in

nova

tion

team

, and

2-3

pa

rtici

pant

s fo

r eac

h vi

l-la

ge e

mpo

wer

men

t and

in

nova

tion

team

.

Ove

r Oct

ober

to N

ovem

ber 2

018

, all

(100

%) 4

34 D

istri

ct In

nova

tion

Team

s, a

nd

6,44

6 V

illag

e Em

pow

erm

ent a

nd In

nova

tion

Team

s, re

ceiv

ed tr

aini

ng o

n im

ple-

men

ting

BID

and

cap

turin

g in

nova

tions

from

BID

.

Com

plet

ed

Mon

itorin

g di

sbur

se-

men

t of G

ener

asi c

om-

mun

ity g

rant

(DO

K C

B).

All

prov

ince

s re

ceiv

ed

disb

urse

men

t and

impl

e-m

ente

d ac

tiviti

es.

Dur

ing

the

repo

rting

per

iod,

Sub

-dis

trict

Inno

vatio

n Te

ams,

and

Vill

age

Inno

vatio

n Te

ams,

wer

e fo

rmed

. How

ever

, the

re w

ere

dela

ys w

ith d

isbu

rsin

g th

e Sp

ecia

l O

pera

tion

Fund

. As

of D

ecem

ber 2

018

, MoV

has

dis

burs

ed th

e Sp

ecia

l Ope

ra-

tiona

l Fun

d to

95%

(6,14

2 of

6,4

46) o

f sub

-dis

trict

s in

33

prov

ince

s, w

hich

am

ount

s to

IDR

311

bill

ion

(76%

of t

he to

tal a

lloca

ted

budg

et).

On

Trac

k

Cap

acity

Bui

ldin

g--T

ech-

nica

l Ser

vice

Pro

vide

r (T

SP) (

IBR

D O

pera

tion)

.

Cur

ricul

um a

nd m

odul

es

deve

lopm

ent.

Cur

ricul

um a

nd d

raft

mod

ules

for T

SP e

n-tre

pren

eurs

hip,

hum

an

deve

lopm

ent a

nd in

fra-

stru

ctur

e.

TSP

train

ing

mod

ules

will

hel

p TS

Ps u

nder

stan

d th

eir r

ole

in a

ssis

ting

villa

ges

(i.e.

, pr

ovid

e se

rvic

es to

vill

ages

to im

plem

ent i

nnov

atio

ns),

and

to d

evel

op b

usin

ess

plan

s (to

sus

tain

ser

vice

s as

an

inst

itutio

n).

LSP

supp

orte

d M

oV to

dev

elop

the

train

ing

curr

icul

um a

nd 10

mod

ules

. Spe

cif-

ical

ly, L

SP s

uppo

rted

MoV

to re

view

the

train

ing

mod

ules

and

faci

litat

e a

wor

k-sh

op to

fina

lize

the

mod

ules

.

Com

plet

ed

Wo

rksh

op

for

final

izin

g m

od

ule

s an

d G

rant

M

aste

r Tr

aine

rs (G

MT)

.

Fina

l mo

dul

es

for

TSP,

17

GM

Ts a

re tr

aine

d a

nd

read

y to

trai

n 35

Mas

ter

Trai

ners

.

MoV

con

duct

ed tr

aini

ng, u

sing

the

deve

lope

d tra

inin

g m

ater

ials

, to

train

17 (o

f the

in

tend

ed 17

) Gra

nd M

aste

r Tra

iner

s (G

MTs

) and

30

(of t

he in

tend

ed 3

5) M

aste

r Tr

aine

rs (8

5% m

ale

and

15%

fem

ales

). LS

P m

onito

red

and

supe

rvis

ed th

e tra

inin

g.

Com

plet

ed

Trai

ning

for t

rain

er (T

OT)

.32

4 tra

iner

s ar

e w

ell

train

ed o

n TS

P.26

4 (o

f the

inte

nded

324

, or 8

3%) o

f Tra

iner

of T

rain

ers

(ToT

) for

the

Tech

nica

l Ser

-vi

ce P

rovi

ders

(TSP

s), w

ere

train

ed in

Jak

arta

in J

uly

(17-2

3) 2

018

. LSP

sup

porte

d M

oV b

y su

perv

isin

g an

d m

onito

ring

the

train

ing

impl

emen

tatio

n. T

he e

xpec

ted

targ

et w

as n

ot m

et d

ue to

del

ays

in is

suin

g th

e tra

inin

g in

vita

tion,

whi

ch m

eant

th

at s

ome

parti

cipa

nts

did

not h

ave

enou

gh p

repa

ratio

n tim

e.

Com

plet

ed

Trai

ning

for T

SP.

Abo

ut 2

,60

4 TS

Ps

rece

ive

capa

city

bui

ldin

g tra

inin

g.

LSP

supp

orte

d M

oV to

dev

elop

gui

delin

es fo

r con

duct

ing

the

TSP

train

ing

at th

e pr

ovin

cial

leve

l. H

owev

er, t

his

activ

ity w

as d

elay

ed d

ue to

bud

get a

nd w

orkp

lan

chal

leng

es. A

s at

Dec

embe

r 31,

2018

, the

TSP

trai

ning

was

impl

emen

ted

in 2

9 of

th

e ex

pect

ed 3

3 pr

ovin

ces

and

2,31

7 pa

rtici

pant

s w

ere

train

ed. T

he tr

aini

ng w

ill

be im

plem

ente

d in

the

rem

aini

ng 5

pro

vinc

es in

ear

ly 2

019

.

On

Trac

k

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

94

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

VIP

Vill

age

Dat

a M

anag

e-m

ent (

IBR

D O

pera

tion)

.Im

prov

emen

t on

Vill

age

Dev

elop

men

t Inf

orm

a-tio

n Sy

stem

(SIP

D).

1. Th

e sy

stem

pro

vide

s re

liabl

e vi

llage

dev

elop

-m

ent p

rogr

am d

ata.

2.

Vill

age

data

is in

tegr

at-

ed in

MoV

.

Ove

rall,

LSP

is p

rovi

ding

mon

itorin

g an

d su

perv

isio

n su

ppor

t to

MoV

for t

his

ac-

tivity

. Whi

le th

is a

ctiv

ity w

as o

rigin

ally

del

ayed

due

to b

udge

t and

wor

k pl

anni

ng

chal

leng

es, a

nd c

hang

es in

key

sta

ff w

ithin

MoV

’s D

ata

and

Info

rmat

ion

Cen

ter

(Pus

datin

), th

e ce

nter

fina

lized

all

tech

nica

l and

bud

get e

xecu

tion

docu

men

ts in

Se

ptem

ber 2

018

, and

imm

edia

tely

com

men

ced

activ

ity im

plem

enta

tion.

As

of D

ecem

ber 2

018

, MoV

’s P

usda

tin h

as u

nder

take

n se

vera

l act

iviti

es to

im

prov

e SI

PD, s

uch

as: d

evel

oped

dat

a ca

tego

ries

for t

he e

xist

ing

data

in

MoV

; con

duct

ed d

ata

anal

ysis

bas

ed o

n K

PI, v

illag

e in

dex,

etc

.; an

d de

velo

ped

addi

tiona

l nee

ded

appl

icat

ions

to im

prov

e da

ta s

yste

m in

tegr

atio

n. M

ost o

f the

fe

atur

es a

vaila

ble

in th

e SI

PD w

ere

wor

king

wel

l, ex

cept

for d

ata

colle

ctio

n an

d da

ta v

erifi

catio

n se

rvic

es.

On

Trac

k

Wor

ksho

p to

iden

tify

need

s, e

xist

ing

reso

urc-

es a

nd c

onst

rain

ts.

A c

lear

act

ion

plan

to

acce

lera

te th

e pr

oces

s of

de

velo

ping

SIP

D.

Th

is a

ctiv

ity

wa

s d

rop

pe

d d

ue

to

ch

an

ge

s in

th

e d

esi

gn

an

d t

he

su

pp

ort

re

qu

ire

d f

rom

LS

P. I

nste

ad, t

his

activ

ity w

as u

nder

take

n by

MoV

as

part

of th

e m

inis

try’s

SIP

D a

ctiv

ity.

Dro

pped

Fiel

d vi

sit t

o vi

llage

s.

BTO

R to

pro

vide

a s

tra-

tegi

c in

put t

o th

e de

sign

of

SIP

D.

Th

is a

ctiv

ity

wa

s d

rop

pe

d d

ue

to

ch

an

ge

s in

th

e d

esi

gn

an

d t

he

su

pp

ort

re

-q

uir

ed

fro

m L

SP. I

nste

ad, t

he fi

eld

visi

t will

be

impl

emen

ted

by M

oV's

Pus

datin

. D

ropp

ed

Vill

age

Inno

vatio

n In

cu-

batio

n G

rant

(Pilo

t Loc

al

Econ

omic

Dev

elop

-m

ent)

(IBR

D O

pera

tion)

.

100

vill

ages

will

rece

ive

inte

rven

tion

and

bene

fits

from

the

prog

ram

.

MoV

fina

lized

all

requ

ired

docu

men

ts to

impl

emen

t the

VIP

Pilo

t (ge

nera

l ope

r-at

ions

man

ual,

tech

nica

l ope

ratio

nal m

anua

l [w

hich

out

lines

the

pilo

t des

ign]

, te

chni

cal f

und

disb

urse

men

t gui

danc

e, a

nd s

taff

recr

uitm

ent g

uida

nce)

and

se

lect

ed a

ll pi

lot l

ocat

ions

. Pilo

t im

plem

enta

tion

com

men

ced

in 3

1 dis

trict

s in

20

18. T

o m

inim

ize

disr

uptio

ns to

the

pilo

t’s im

plem

enta

tion,

the

LSP

task

team

and

M

oV c

ore

team

eng

aged

inte

nsiv

ely

to a

gree

on

key

mile

ston

es a

nd w

heth

er it

is

feas

ible

to im

plem

ent t

he p

ilot i

n th

e re

mai

ning

loca

tions

(69

loca

tions

) for

the

next

fisc

al y

ear (

2019

).

On

Trac

k

Impl

emen

tatio

n Su

ppor

t an

d Te

chni

cal A

ssis

-ta

nce

(IBR

D O

pera

tion)

.

Exec

utiv

e Tr

aini

ng P

ro-

gram

(ETP

).1.

Impr

oved

MoV

sta

ff ca

paci

ty fo

r ach

ievi

ng n

a-tio

nal g

oals

and

Min

iste

r’s

prio

ritie

s.

2. Im

prov

ed s

taff

capa

c-ity

to p

lan,

impl

emen

t, m

onito

r and

eva

luat

e,

espe

cial

ly in

inte

rpre

ting

gove

rnm

ent p

olic

ies.

The

ETP

has

mad

e go

od p

rogr

ess

on a

ddre

ssin

g m

inis

try-w

ide

capa

city

con

-st

rain

ts. I

n 20

17, i

t exe

cute

d th

ree

core

act

iviti

es th

at s

uppo

rted

impr

ovem

ents

in

7 pr

iorit

y ar

eas

of im

prov

emen

t; an

d th

us fa

r it h

as im

plem

ente

d 7

of 14

act

iviti

es

rela

ting

to th

e sa

me

prio

rity

area

s. A

revi

ew fi

naliz

ed in

May

20

18, c

oncl

uded

that

th

e 20

17 E

TP a

ctiv

ities

con

tribu

ted

to im

prov

emen

ts in

5 o

f the

7 p

riorit

y ar

eas

(ISR

VIP

Oct

20

18).

To o

ptim

ize

impl

emen

tatio

n in

20

19, L

SP w

ill c

ondu

ct a

ser

ies

of m

eetin

gs w

ith M

oV w

ithin

the

first

qua

rter o

f 20

19 to

dis

cuss

the

ETP'

s im

ple-

men

tatio

n de

sign

. The

ass

igne

d pe

rson

in c

harg

e fro

m M

oV w

ill b

e re

spon

sibl

e fo

r the

ove

rall

eval

uatio

n of

the

activ

ity’s

resu

lt.

On

Trac

k

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

95

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

VIP

Impl

emen

tatio

n Su

ppor

t M

issi

on fo

r VIP

.A

ide

mem

oire

.LS

P un

derto

ok a

n im

plem

enta

tion

supp

ort m

issi

on (I

SM) d

urin

g Fe

brua

ry to

Mar

ch

2018

. Fin

ding

s fro

m th

e m

issi

on w

ere

disc

usse

d w

ith th

e N

atio

nal M

anag

emen

t C

onsu

ltant

s (K

NM

). Th

e ai

de m

emoi

re a

nd IS

R w

ere

com

plet

ed in

May

20

18 a

nd

Oct

ober

20

18, r

espe

ctiv

ely.

Com

plet

ed

Mon

itorin

g TS

P tra

in-

ings

.B

TOR

.Th

e ac

tivity

is c

ompl

ete.

Dur

ing

2018

, LSP

mon

itore

d th

e TS

P tra

inin

gs.

Com

plet

ed

Mon

itorin

g V

IP tr

aini

ng

for T

A, P

D, P

LD, T

IK, a

nd

TPID

.

BTO

R.

Dur

ing

the

repo

rting

per

iod,

LSP

sup

ervi

sed

and

mon

itore

d th

e G

rand

Mas

ter

Trai

ner,

Mas

ter T

rain

er, T

rain

ing

of T

rain

er a

nd V

illag

e C

omm

unity

Em

pow

erm

ent

Con

sulta

nt tr

aini

ngs.

All

BTO

Rs

are

com

plet

e. L

SP is

als

o cu

rren

tly d

evel

opin

g a

repo

rt ou

tlini

ng th

e fin

ding

s fro

m th

is w

ork.

Com

plet

ed

Mon

itorin

g V

illag

e In

nova

tion

Exch

ange

at

dist

rict a

nd s

ub-d

istri

ct

leve

ls.

BTO

Rs

of B

ursa

Inno

va-

tion.

O

ver S

epte

mbe

r to

Nov

embe

r 20

18, t

he L

SP te

am m

onito

red

and

supe

rvis

ed B

ID

impl

emen

tatio

n in

4 d

istri

cts

(Ser

ang,

Ben

gkul

u U

tara

, Gun

ung

Kid

ul a

nd B

adun

g).

LSP

foun

d th

at in

som

e ca

ses

the

loca

l gov

ernm

ent c

omm

uniti

es v

iew

the

BID

as

an e

xhib

ition

of p

rodu

cts

and

did

not a

lway

s un

ders

tand

the

conc

epts

offe

red

by

BID

. LSP

als

o fo

und

that

som

e B

IDs

incl

ude

a co

mbi

natio

n of

oth

er e

vent

s (e

.g.,

loca

l par

ties

and

art e

xhib

ition

s et

c.),

whi

ch re

duce

s th

e es

senc

e of

BID

act

ivi-

ties.

LSP

reco

mm

ende

d B

ID is

sim

plifi

ed, n

ot c

ombi

ned

with

oth

er e

vent

s, a

nd is

ca

rrie

d ou

t dur

ing

the

Mus

renb

ang

at th

e su

b-di

stric

t lev

el.

Com

plet

ed

Vill

age

Law

PA

SA

Vill

age

Law

PA

SAA

lloca

tion

of V

illag

e Fu

nds

beco

mes

mor

e po

verty

targ

eted

.

W

orki

ng P

aper

on

Allo

ca-

tion

Fund

.In

20

17, t

he G

oI P

arlia

men

t app

rove

d th

e re

vise

d V

illag

e Fu

nd A

lloca

tion

Polic

y,

whi

ch in

corp

orat

ed a

dvic

e fro

m th

e W

orld

Ban

k to

adj

ust a

nd m

ake

the

Vill

age

Fund

Allo

catio

n Fo

rmul

a fa

irer a

nd m

ore

pro-

poor

.

In 2

018

, LSP

und

erto

ok d

etai

led

anal

ysis

to u

nder

stan

d th

e im

pact

of t

he a

djus

ted

2018

form

ula

on v

ario

us in

dica

tors

(suc

h as

vill

age

fund

per

cap

ita a

nd d

iver

se

type

s of

vill

ages

). B

ased

on

this

ana

lysi

s, L

SP d

rafte

d th

e ‘A

lloca

ting

Indo

nesi

a’s

Vill

age

Fund

(Dan

a D

esa)

: Pro

mis

ing

Prog

ress

and

Opp

ortu

nitie

s fo

r Eve

n B

ette

r Po

verty

and

Dev

elop

men

t Tar

getin

g W

orki

ng P

aper

’. Th

e w

orki

ng p

aper

out

lines

th

e im

porta

nce

of v

illag

e tra

nsfe

rs, k

ey c

halle

nges

with

the

allo

catio

n fo

rmul

a, th

e 20

18 p

ositi

ve re

form

s, a

nd o

ptio

ns fo

r fur

ther

impr

ovem

ent i

n 20

19 a

nd b

eyon

d.

The

pape

r was

fina

lized

and

sha

red

with

DJP

K in

Jun

e 20

18.

Com

plet

ed

Vill

age

publ

ic e

xpen

di-

ture

revi

ew.

V

illag

e In

frast

ruct

ure

Qua

lity

Aud

it.

Bui

ldin

g on

LSP

’s V

iPER

Ana

lysi

s in

20

17, i

n M

ay 2

018

LSP

laun

ched

the

Vill

age

In-

frast

ruct

ure

Qua

lity

Aud

it. D

urin

g M

ay to

Jul

y 20

18, L

SP re

view

ed th

e qu

ality

and

co

nstru

ctio

n pr

oces

s of

165

infra

stru

ctur

e su

b-pr

ojec

ts, a

cros

s 58

vill

ages

in s

ix

prov

ince

s, in

clud

ing

Wes

t Jav

a (M

ay 2

018

); A

ceh

and

NTT

(Jul

y 20

18);

and

Wes

t Su

law

esi,

Wes

t Kal

iman

tan

and

Mal

uku

(Aug

ust 2

018

).

On

Trac

k

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

96

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Vill

age

Law

PA

SALS

P ha

s un

derta

ken

initi

al a

naly

sis

of th

e re

sults

, and

the

draf

t rep

ort i

s co

mpl

ete.

Pr

elim

inar

y fin

ding

s in

dica

te th

at o

vera

ll th

e qu

ality

of i

nfra

stru

ctur

e co

nstru

cted

un

der t

he V

illag

e La

w is

low

er th

an th

at u

nder

PN

PM. T

o fin

aliz

e th

e re

port,

LSP

w

ill p

rese

nt th

e in

itial

find

ings

with

bro

ader

sta

keho

lder

s (e

.g.,

KOM

PAK

and

key

m

inis

tries

, suc

h as

PU

, MoH

A, a

nd M

oV) i

n a

mee

ting

to s

eek

inpu

ts a

nd fe

ed-

back

. It i

s ex

pect

ed th

e re

port

will

be

final

ized

in A

pril

2019

.

Dis

trict

Ex

pend

iture

Rev

iew

.V

illag

e La

w P

ASA

is d

evel

opin

g an

exp

endi

ture

revi

ew, w

hich

con

solid

ates

the

ViP

ER a

naly

sis

from

20

17. T

he e

xpen

ditu

re re

view

will

pro

vide

det

aile

d an

alys

is

of n

atio

nal a

nd lo

cal g

over

nmen

t exp

endi

ture

s an

d co

sts

vers

us th

eir r

espe

ctiv

e m

anda

tes

for p

rovi

ding

vill

age

supp

ort.

The

draf

t Dis

trict

Exp

endi

ture

Rev

iew

will

be

final

ized

in J

anua

ry 2

019

. The

dra

ft w

ill b

e re

view

ed a

t a te

chni

cal l

evel

wor

ksho

p w

ith, a

nd o

rgan

ized

by,

LSP

in

Janu

ary

2019

. The

dra

ft w

ill a

lso

be p

eer r

evie

wed

in e

arly

20

19. T

his

dist

rict

expe

nditu

re re

view

will

be

inte

grat

ed in

to th

e Lo

cal G

over

nmen

t Ass

essm

ent a

s an

ann

ex.

On

Trac

k

Regu

lato

ry fr

amew

ork

for V

FM.

Revi

sed

Perm

enda

gri 1

13.

In 2

017

, LSP

pro

vide

d su

bsta

ntia

l tec

hnic

al in

puts

to th

e G

oI to

info

rm it

s re

visi

ons

of P

erm

enda

gri 1

13 s

o th

at th

e re

vise

d re

gula

tion

was

mor

e re

sults

-bas

ed a

nd

inco

rpor

ated

prin

cipl

es o

f tra

nspa

renc

y, p

artic

ipat

ion,

and

acc

ount

abili

ty. T

he G

oI

issu

ed P

erm

enda

gri 2

0 (r

evis

ed P

erm

enda

gri 1

13) i

n A

pril

2018

.

In 2

018

, LSP

pro

vide

d te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e to

DG

Bin

a Pe

mde

s in

pre

parin

g di

ssem

inat

ion

mat

eria

ls (f

our i

nfog

raph

ics)

on

the

revi

sed

Perm

enda

gri.

In A

ugus

t (8

-9) 2

018

, LSP

sup

porte

d B

ina

Pem

des

to s

ocia

lize

and

diss

emin

ate

Perm

end-

agri

20/2

018

by

cond

uctin

g a

wor

ksho

p. 2

46 o

ut o

f 434

dis

trict

s/ci

ty b

enefi

ciar

ies

of D

ana

Des

a, 10

MoH

A s

taff,

and

the

Wor

ld B

ank,

atte

nded

the

wor

ksho

p in

Ja

karta

.

Com

plet

ed

Wor

king

Pap

er o

n V

illag

e Fi

nanc

ial M

anag

emen

t.D

urin

g th

e re

porti

ng p

erio

d, L

SP d

rafte

d th

e W

orki

ng P

aper

on

VFM

. The

pap

er

outli

nes

the

stre

ngth

s an

d w

eakn

esse

s of

the

new

Per

men

dagr

i No.

20

/20

18

on V

FM a

nd p

ropo

ses

reco

mm

enda

tions

to th

e G

oI (D

G B

ina

Pem

des

of M

oHA

an

d D

G F

isca

l Bal

ance

and

DG

Tre

asur

y of

MoF

) abo

ut fu

ture

pos

sibl

e im

prov

e-m

ents

and

a p

hase

d im

plem

enta

tion.

The

Wor

king

Pap

er w

as o

rigin

ally

del

ayed

to

ens

ure

that

the

late

st re

gula

tory

and

sys

tem

cha

nges

impl

emen

ted

by th

e G

oI

(bas

ed o

n LS

P re

cent

sup

port)

are

cap

ture

d. It

is e

xpec

ted

that

the

VFM

Wor

king

Pa

per w

ill b

e fin

aliz

ed in

ear

ly 2

019

.

On

Trac

k

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

97

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Vill

age

Law

PA

SAV

FM s

yste

ms

impr

ove-

men

t sup

port.

Q

ualit

y A

ssur

ance

on

Sisk

eude

s.LS

P su

ppor

ted

MoH

A a

nd B

PKP

to ro

llout

and

mak

e Si

skeu

des

mor

e eff

ectiv

e.

To d

ate,

Vill

age

Law

PA

SA h

as p

rovi

ded

tech

nica

l inp

uts

for a

pplic

atio

n de

vel-

opm

ent,

qual

ity a

ssur

ance

, tra

inin

g m

odul

e de

velo

pmen

t, te

chni

cal r

evie

ws

of

softw

are

impl

emen

tatio

n, a

nd in

puts

on

the

Sisk

eude

s di

ssem

inat

ion/

impl

emen

-ta

tion

plan

. Bin

a Pe

mde

s an

d B

PKP

are

upgr

adin

g Si

skeu

des

base

d on

Per

-m

enda

gri n

o. 2

0/2

018

, and

the

revi

sed

syst

em w

as la

unch

ed in

Nov

embe

r 20

18.

LSP

is s

uppo

rting

the

GoI

to p

rovi

de q

ualit

y as

sura

nce

of th

e re

vise

d Si

skeu

des

impl

emen

tatio

n.

On

Trac

k

OM

SPA

N

Ass

essm

ent.

VL

PASA

is p

rovi

ding

TA

to th

e D

G T

reas

ury

of M

oF to

impr

ove

the

qual

ity o

f D

ana

Des

a an

d D

AK

Fis

ik o

utpu

ts c

olle

cted

thro

ugh

OM

SPA

N b

y st

anda

rdiz

ing

outp

ut n

omen

clat

ures

and

thei

r met

rics.

To d

ate,

LSP

has

ass

esse

d th

e O

M S

PAN

sys

tem

to re

view

and

und

erst

and

its

func

tiona

lity,

des

ign,

con

figur

atio

n, fu

nctio

nal a

nd te

chni

cal a

rchi

tect

ure,

the

doc-

umen

tatio

n of

OM

-SPA

N, a

nd it

s fu

nctio

nalit

y fo

r DA

K F

isik

and

Dan

a D

esa

(and

th

e bu

sine

ss p

roce

sses

sup

porte

d by

it).

LSP

also

revi

ewed

regu

latio

ns, a

nd h

eld

a m

eetin

g w

ith k

ey M

oF c

ount

erpa

rts c

once

rnin

g th

e do

cum

ents

for t

heir

inpu

ts.

MoF

’s in

puts

wer

e us

ed to

info

rm th

e ov

eral

l ass

essm

ent.

LSP

has

deve

lope

d th

e dr

aft a

sses

smen

t rep

ort o

f OM

-SPA

N. T

he re

port

is c

ur-

rent

ly u

nder

goin

g in

tern

al re

view

s an

d is

exp

ecte

d to

be

final

ized

in 2

019

.

On

Trac

k

Impr

oved

VL

regu

lato

ry

fram

ewor

k fo

r inc

lusi

on

and

parti

cipa

tion.

Re

vise

d Pe

rmen

desa

on

Vill

age

Inte

r-

Vill

age

Dev

elop

men

t.

LSP-

supp

orte

d co

nsul

tant

s as

sist

ed th

e m

inis

try to

pro

mot

e re

gula

tory

dra

fting

ba

sed

on e

vide

nce.

In 2

018

, Vill

age

Law

PA

SA T

A s

uppo

rted

the

upda

te a

nd

issu

ing

of P

erm

ende

sa o

n V

illag

e D

evel

opm

ent a

nd C

omm

unity

Em

pow

erm

ent

by s

uppo

rting

pub

lic c

onsu

ltatio

ns, w

orks

hops

, and

dra

fting

the

Perm

ende

sa.

LSP

supp

orte

d a

cons

ignm

ent m

eetin

g an

d w

orks

hop

by in

vitin

g ex

perts

on

law

/re

gula

tion

to g

athe

r inp

uts,

vie

ws,

and

reco

mm

enda

tions

to in

form

the

regu

la-

tion.

The

Vill

age

Law

PA

SA T

A e

nsur

ed th

at th

e pr

oces

s w

as m

ore

parti

cipa

tory

an

d in

clud

ed a

wid

er g

roup

of s

take

hold

ers,

incl

udin

g di

ffere

nt m

inis

tries

(MoF

, M

oHA

), C

SOs,

vill

age-

leve

l sta

keho

lder

s, a

nd lo

cal g

over

nmen

t. Th

e Pe

rmen

de-

sa is

cur

rent

ly b

eing

inte

rnal

ly re

view

ed a

nd fi

naliz

ed b

y M

oV.

Com

plet

ed

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

98

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Vill

age

Law

PA

SARe

vise

d Pe

rmen

dagr

i on

Vill

age

Com

mun

ity In

stitu

tions

an

d V

illag

e C

usto

mar

y In

stitu

tions

.

The

regu

latio

n w

as fi

naliz

ed in

ear

ly 2

018

and

app

rove

d in

Apr

il 2

018

(Per

men

d-ag

ri N

o. 18

/20

18).

To s

uppo

rt th

e dr

aftin

g pr

oces

s, L

SP

prov

ided

TA

, inc

ludi

ng

supp

ortin

g pr

oble

m id

entifi

catio

n (th

roug

h de

skto

p re

view

, pan

el d

iscu

ssio

ns

and

LKD

and

LA

D r

elat

ed s

tudy

); a

join

t mis

sion

with

MoH

A; a

nd F

GD

s w

ith e

x-pe

rts

(e.g

., fr

om u

nive

rsiti

es, r

esea

rch

inst

itutio

ns, c

usto

mar

y re

late

d In

done

sian

or

gani

zatio

ns, a

nd r

elev

ant m

inis

trie

s/in

stitu

tions

). LS

P al

so s

uppo

rted

mul

tiple

w

orks

hops

and

mee

tings

, dev

elop

ed a

pol

icy

pape

r, an

d pr

ovid

ed v

ario

us

inpu

ts o

n di

ffere

nt p

rovi

sion

s fo

r th

e dr

aft M

oHA

reg

ulat

ion

on L

KD

and

LA

D.

Com

plet

ed

Regu

lato

ry Im

pact

A

sses

smen

t (R

IA) a

nd

Evid

ence

-bas

ed P

olic

y tra

inin

g co

urse

.

LSP

prov

ided

TA

to s

uppo

rt a

nd im

prov

e th

e qu

ality

of m

odul

e pr

epar

atio

n an

d im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e tr

aini

ng. I

n 2

017

, LS

P su

ppor

ted

the

GoI

to d

esig

n an

d de

-ve

lop

a Re

gula

tory

Impa

ct A

sses

smen

t (R

IA) a

nd E

vide

nce-

base

d Po

licy

trai

ning

co

urse

, inc

ludi

ng a

trai

ning

man

ual,

deta

iled

mat

eria

ls a

nd e

xam

ples

. LS

P al

so s

uppo

rted

trai

ning

the

trai

ners

. In

20

18, t

he tr

aini

ng w

as p

ilote

d by

MoV

an

d le

sson

s le

arne

d w

ere

inco

rpor

ated

into

the

cour

se m

ater

ials

and

trai

ner

appr

oach

. Par

ticip

ants

incl

uded

rep

rese

ntat

ives

from

oth

er m

inis

trie

s an

d lo

cal

gove

rnm

ents

. Agr

eed

follo

w u

p ac

tions

from

MoV

and

Men

ko-P

MK

par

ticip

ants

w

ere

also

dev

elop

ed.

Com

plet

ed

Impr

oved

VL

faci

litat

ion

and

capa

city

sup

port

- fo

cus

on in

clus

ion

and

parti

cipa

tion.

W

orki

ng P

aper

on

Vill

age

Faci

litat

ion

and

Cap

acity

B

uild

ing.

Dur

ing

the

repo

rtin

g pe

riod,

LS

P dr

afte

d th

e W

orki

ng P

aper

on

Vill

age

Faci

l-ita

tion

and

Cap

acity

Bui

ldin

g, w

hich

out

lines

an

over

all r

evie

w o

f the

vill

age

faci

litat

ion

stru

ctur

e. T

he w

orki

ng p

aper

is c

urre

ntly

und

ergo

ing

inte

rnal

and

ed

itoria

l rev

iew

and

is e

xpec

ted

to b

e fin

aliz

ed in

Jan

uary

20

19.

On

Trac

k

Stoc

ktak

ing

repo

rt on

in

clus

ion

and

vuln

erab

le

grou

ps in

VL.

In 2

018

, LS

P la

unch

ed th

e st

ockt

akin

g re

view

, con

duct

ed a

des

k re

view

, in

itiat

ed F

GD

s w

ith p

rogr

ams

supp

ortin

g in

clus

ion

(e.g

., PE

KK

A's

Para

digt

a),

and

unde

rtoo

k fie

ldw

ork

in tw

o di

stric

ts w

here

the

Para

digt

a pr

ogra

m is

act

ive,

in

clud

ing

Kubu

Ray

a D

istr

ict i

n W

est K

alim

anta

n (S

epte

mbe

r 2

018

) and

Bre

bes

Dis

tric

t in

Cen

tral

Jav

a (O

ctob

er 2

018

).

An

LSP

repr

esen

tativ

e sh

ared

the

initi

al fi

ndin

gs fr

om th

e de

sk s

tudy

and

fiel

d-w

ork

as a

CS

O F

orum

in N

ovem

ber

20

18. T

he s

essi

on w

as w

ell a

ttend

ed (a

bout

40

par

ticip

ants

from

CS

O In

done

sian

CS

Os)

and

the

key

findi

ngs

— p

artic

ular

ly

the

need

to b

uild

ing

polit

ical

cap

acity

of t

he v

illag

ers

as a

cou

nter

vaili

ng fo

rce

in th

e vi

llage

— w

ere

wel

l rec

eive

d by

the

CS

O a

ctor

s. L

SP

is c

urre

ntly

fina

lizin

g th

e re

port

, whi

ch is

exp

ecte

d to

be

com

plet

ed in

Jan

uary

20

19

On

Trac

k

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

99

PR

OG

RA

M

AC

TIV

ITY

S

UB

AC

TIV

ITY

PLA

NN

ED

OU

TPU

T/TA

RG

ET

CU

RR

ENT

PR

OG

RES

S

PR

OG

RES

S

STA

TUS

Loca

l G

ove

rnm

ent

A

sse

ssm

ent

Re

po

rt.

In M

arch

20

18, L

SP la

unch

ed a

n as

sess

men

t of L

ocal

Gov

ernm

ent s

uppo

rt fo

r V

illag

e La

w im

plem

enta

tion.

Dur

ing

the

repo

rting

per

iod,

LSP

und

erto

ok a

des

k re

view

of l

ocal

gov

ernm

ent m

anda

tes

unde

r Vill

age

Law

and

ass

ocia

ted

reg-

ulat

ions

. In

May

20

18, L

SP to

geth

er w

ith B

ina

Pem

des,

als

o co

nduc

ted

dist

rict

asse

ssm

ents

(dat

a co

llect

ion)

to a

sses

s ac

tual

pro

vinc

ial,

dist

rict,

and

sub-

dis-

trict

gov

ernm

ent s

uppo

rt to

vill

age

gove

rnm

ents

. Dat

a w

as c

olle

cted

acr

oss

4 pr

ovin

ces,

7 d

istri

cts,

10 s

ub-d

istri

cts,

and

16 v

illag

es, a

nd in

volv

ed in

terv

iew

s w

ith

dist

rict/s

ub-d

istri

cts

gove

rnm

ent r

epre

sent

ativ

es, v

illag

e go

vern

men

t offi

cial

s,

non-

gove

rnm

ent s

take

hold

ers,

and

vill

ager

s.

This

act

ivity

was

slig

htly

del

ayed

due

to d

ifficu

lties

in o

btai

ning

dis

trict

and

su

b-di

stric

t bud

get,

real

izat

ion,

and

trai

ning

dat

a. T

he L

ocal

Gov

ernm

ent A

sses

s-m

ent w

ill b

e fin

aliz

ed in

Jan

uary

20

19. T

he d

raft

will

be

revi

ewed

in w

orks

hop

at

the

tech

nica

l lev

el w

ith M

OH

and

org

aniz

ed b

y LS

P on

Jan

uary

20

19. T

he d

raft

also

be

peer

revi

ewed

.

On

Trac

k

AN

NE

X 3

(C

ON

TIN

UE

D)

100 CHAPTER NINE

ANNEX 4

LSP Knowledge Products and PublicationsSecretariat1. KOMPAK and LSP’s Joint SPC. 2018. MoHA Regulation 20/2018 on Village Financial Management.

2. LSP, KOMPAK, MAHKOTA, and KSI’s joint SPC. 2018. The Village Fund Policy.

3. MAHKOTA and LSP’s Joint SPC. 2018. Joint National Strategy to Accelerate Stunting Reduction.

4. World Bank. 2018. Local Solutions to Poverty Annual Progress Report 2017 (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/sites/default/files/2018-04/Indonesia_Social_Development_World_Bank_Local_Solutions_

to_Poverty_Annual_Report_2017.pdf

5. World Bank. 2018. Local Solutions to Poverty (LSP) Achievement Brief 2017.

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/sites/default/files/2018-07/Local-Solutions-to-Poverty-Indonesia-Achievements-Brief-2017-

World-Bank.pdf

ECED Frontline Pilot1. Local Solutions to Poverty-World Bank. 2018. Diklat Berjenjang Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini (Published Video).

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/node/382

2. Local Solutions to Poverty-World Bank. 2018. Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini (Published Video).

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/node/345

Generasi1. Olken, Benjamin; Sacks, Audrey; Endarso, Gregorius Kelik Agus; Subandoro, Ali Winoto; Wrobel, Robert. 2018. Indonesia - Long-

term Impact Evaluation of Generasi (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.

http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/481161529900287499/Indonesia-Long-term-impact-evaluation-of-Generasi

2. Sacks, Audrey; Grayman, Jesse Hession; Afriko, Marzi; Anggraini, Nelti; Endarso, Gregorius Kelik Agus; Prahara, Hestu; Prabowo,

Agung; Rozana, Lina; Subandoro, Ali Winoto; Wrobel, Robert; Friel, Kelley Reese. 2018. Indonesia - Long-term Generasi Qualita-

tive Study (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.

http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/296651529900604983/pdf/Long-Term-Generasi-Qualitative-Study.pdf

3. World Bank. 2018. Growing Up Smart and Tall: Human Development Worker Infographic. Local Solutions to Poverty - World Bank

Group.

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/sites/default/files/2018-07/3954-Indonesia-Growing-Up-Smart-and-Tall-Human-

Development-Worker-Infographic_0.pdf

INEY 1. World Bank. 2018. Collaboration for Stunting Reduction (Published Video).

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/node/325

2. World Bank. 2018. My Height, My Future (Published Video).

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/node/263

3. World Bank. 2018. Menangani Stunting Dengan Intervensi Terintegrasi (Published Video).

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/node/324

4. World Bank. 2018. Kerja Sama Menurunkan Angka Stunting (Published Video).

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/id/node/325

101ANNEXES

KIAT Guru1. Ariyanto, Novi. 2018. Weaving Hope in Remote West Kalimantan School. Local Solutions to Poverty - World Bank Group and

Yayasan BaKTI.

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/id/publication/menjalin-asa-di-ujung-barat-kabupaten-landak.html

2. Diani, Hera. 2018. Camera App a Catalyst for Teacher Performance Improvement in East Nusa Tenggara. Local Solutions to Pov-

erty - World Bank Group and Yayasan BaKTI

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/id/publication/aplikasi-kamera-katalis-peningkatan-kinerja-layanan-guru-di-nusa-tengga-

ra-timur.html

3. Empowering Communities for Better Education. 2018. (Published Video)

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/video/community-empowerment-to-improve-education-service-in-disadvantaged-villages

4. KIAT Kamera. 2018. (Published Video)

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/node/383

5. Local Solutions to Poverty-World Bank. 2018. KIAT Guru Fact sheet.

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/sites/default/files/2018-05/KIAT_Guru_FactSheet_ENG_180430_View.pdf

6. Susanti, Dewi. 2018. Social Accountability in Action: Improving Teachers’ Presence and Teachers’ Service Quality. Local Solutions

to Poverty - World Bank Group dan Yayasan BaKTI.

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/id/publication/akuntabilitas-sosial-meningkatkan-kehadiran-dan-kualitas-layanan-guru.html

Village Law PASA1. Diningrat, Rendy Adrian. 2018. SMERU Policy Brief: Promoting Supervision of Village Administration by Communities. Village Law

Series No.4/April/2018. Local Solutions to Poverty World Bank and SMERU.

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/sites/default/files/2018-06/Indonesia-Promoting-Community-Based-Village-Supervision.pdf

2. Kemendagri dan LSP World Bank. 2018. Booklet Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri,

Nomor 20, Tahun 2018. (MoH and LSP World Bank. 2018. Booklet of Village Financial Management Based on the Regulation of

the Minister of Home Affairs, Number 20, 2018.)

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/sites/default/files/2018-08/Pengelolaan-Keuangan-Desa-Berdasarkan-Permend-

agri-20-2018_1.pdf

3. Local Solutions to Poverty dan Lembaga Penelitian SMERU. Februari, 2018. Peran Supradesa dalam Tata Kelola Desa Presen-

tasi Power Point. (Local Solutions to Poverty and SMERU Research Institute. February 2018. The Role of Supradesa: Power Point

Presentation)

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/sites/default/files/2018-02/180214%20-%20BBL%20-%20Peran%20Supradesa%20

dalam%20Tata%20Kelola%20Desa.pdf

4. Local Solutions to Poverty World Bank dan Lembaga Penelitian SMERU. Maret 2018. Proses Perencanaan dan Penganggaran

Desa, Power Point Presentation. (Local Solutions to Poverty World Bank and SMERU Research Institute. March 2018. Village

Planning and Budgeting Process, Power Point Presentation.)

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/sites/default/files/2018-06/Material%20BBL_Planning%20and%20Budgeting_Final_En-

glishpptx_0.pdf

5. Local Solutions to Poverty World Bank dan Lembaga Penelitian SMERU. 2018. Participation, Transparency and Accountability

in Village Law Implementation: Sentinel Villages Study Baseline Findings. Local Solutions to Poverty World Bank and SMERU.

https://library.localsolutionstopoverty.org/collection/detail.php?id=9308&lang=id

6. Ruhmaniyati. 2018. SMERU Catatan Kebijakan: Memperbaiki Kebijakan Padat Karya Tunai di Desa. Seri UU Desa No.5/Okt/2018.

Local Solutions to Poverty World Bank and SMERU (Ruhmaniyati. 2018. SMERU Policy Brief: Improve the Cash for Work Policy in

the Village. Village Law Series No.5/Okt/2018. Local Solutions to Poverty World Bank and SMERU).

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/sites/default/files/2018-11/3979_Memperbaiki_Kebijakan_Padat_Karya_Tunai_di_Desa_

PB05.pdf

7. Syukri, Muhammad, Palmira P. Bachtiar, Asep Kurniawan, Gema SM Sedyadi, Kartawijaya , Rendy A. Diningrat, Ulfah Alifia. April

102 CHAPTER NINE

2018. Studi Implementasi Undang-Undang No.6, Tahun 2014, tentang Desa: Laporan Baseline. Local Solutions to Poverty dan

Lembaga Penelitian SMERU (Syukri, Muhammad, Palmira P. Bachtiar, Asep Kurniawan, Gema SM Sedyadi, Kartawijaya, Rendy A.

Diningrat, Ulfah Alifia. 2018. Study on Implementation of Government Regulation No. 6, 2014, on Villages: Baseline Report. Local

Solutions to Poverty and SMERU Research Institute.)

https://localsolutionstopoverty.org/sites/default/files/2018-05/Analytics_Sentinel%20Study_SMERU_Qualitative%20Base-

line%20Study_BHS_published.pdf

Analytic1. Sacks, Audrey; Pierskalla, Jan Henryk. 2018. Mapping Indonesia’s Civil Service (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.

http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/643861542638957994/Mapping-Indonesia-s-Civil-Service

2. World Bank. 2018. Mapping Indonesia’s Civil Service 2018 Infographic. World Bank Group.

http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/infographic/2018/11/21/mapping-indonesias-civil-service-2018

103ANNEXES

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

PRACTICE MANAGER

Nina Bhatt

TASK TEAM LEADERS

Samuel Thomas Clark, Ahmad Zaki Fahmi, Christopher Finch, Kathleen Whimp, Ihsan

Haerudin, Adji Danya Delita Hakim, Yulia Herawati, Lily Hoo, Elvina Karjadi, Anna O’Donnell,

Sadwanto Purnomo, Laura Ralston, Rosfita Roesli, Claudia Roxx, Audrey Sacks, Bambang

Soetono, Dewi Susanti, Noriko Toyoda

WRITERS AND EDITORS

Bryan Rochelle and Ashlee Schleger-Brown

SECRETARIAT TEAM

Daniel Seno Yusanto, Ashlee Schleger-Brown, Megha Kapoor, Chatarina Widiarti, Fibria

Heliani, Hardini Utami, RA Puji Wulandari, Hera Diani

M&E CONSULTANT

Clear Horizons

M&E FOCAL POINTS

Budi Wijoyo, Christina Natalia, Eddy Trang, Gerda Gulo, Karrie Mclaughin, Octaviera Herawati

GRAPHIC DESIGNERS

Phoebe Wathoel & Wulan Dewi

PHOTOGRAPHER

World Bank Indonesia Team, Matahati, Fauzan Ijazah, TNP2K-KIAT Guru