annual report 2011 pattiro english version

7/29/2019 Annual Report 2011 PATTIRO English version

1/36

1|P a g e

ANNUALREPORT

2011

PATTIRO

PATTIROCenterforRegionalInformationandStudiesJl.IntanNo.81,CilandakBarat

Jakarta12430INDONESIA

Telp.+622175915498,+622175915546

Fax.+62217512503

[email protected]


2/36

2|P a g e

PrefacefromBoardofSupervisorsGreatTasksWaitingAhead

PATTIROhasmissionstocarry.PATTIROseekstostrengthencitizens

capacity to be involved in public policymaking process. PATTIRO

encourages transparencyandaccountability in governance at central

andlocallevel.PATTIROpromotestransparencyandaccountabilityof

oilandgasextractiveindustry,PublicInformationOpenness(KIP),and

assistedinthebirthofLawonPublicInformationOpenness.Inhealth

sector,PATTIROstrengthenscapacityandparticipationofcivilsociety

atlocalleveltomakehealthpoliciesaddressexistinggapproblems.

Untiltheendof2010,PATTIROconductedtechnicalassistanceinBlora

(Central JavaProvince) and Bojonegoro (East Java Province) to local

governments.Thetechnicalassistanceismainlyinmakingsustainable

local development plan to anticipate increasing revenues from oil and gas sector. PATTIRO

encouragedsustainabledevelopmentintheareatoensirethatrevenuesfromoilandgasindustry

areusedforfulfillingcitizensbasicrights,deliveringpublicservices,andimprovinglifequalityof

community,particularlyfuturegenerations.Attheendoflastyear,westartedanewprogramon

integrityandaccountabilityissuesinsocialaidprogram,andWaterSMS.Bothprogramsareour

cooperationwithUSAID.

Within 12years, PATTIROsprograms are still limitedto some regions, namely50 districtsand

cities of10provinces.This isvery smallcomparedto497districtsandcitiesof 33provincesinIndonesia.Thisfactimpliesthatjourneyofstrengtheningcapacityandraisingawarenessofcitizens

is still long and great tasks wait ahead of us. It demands participation of all nation elements,

includinggovernment,legislatives,communitymembers,anddonorpartners.

PATTIRO sends gratitude to all work partners that support us in financial and program

implementation in previous years. Partners including USAID, AUSAID, Hivos, New Zealand Aid

Program (NZAID), Ford Foundation (FF), Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP),

InternationalBudgetPartnership(IBP),HerWai,RevenueWatchInstitute(RWI),andotherdonor

agencies.

Jakarta,October2011

SyahrirWahab

Supervisor


3/36

3|P a g e

PrefacefromExecutiveDirectorAdddressingDecentralizationChallenge

Democratization,commitmenttoHumanRightsanddecentralization

inIndonesiawithinthelast12yearshavebeenopportunityaswellas

challenge. On one hand, democratization provides enough room for

Indonesian citizens to be active in policymaking in this country,

includingindevelopmentplanningandlawmaking.

Democratization isprovedto giveopportunityto peopleto influence

policy,tounderstandandmonitorpolicyimplementation,andtoassess

anddemandtogovernmentasstateadministrator.Thesecanbedonein deliberate forum, public consultation with executives and

legislatives, and in establishing public opinion in printed media,

electronicmedia,andonlinemedia.

Decentralizationhasgivenbigopportunitytolocalgovernmenttomakepoliciesautonomouslyto

address local challenges and communities and stakeholders aspirations and needs. However,

decentralization regulated in Law no. 22/1999 and changed into Law no. 32/2004 finds big

challengesintheimplementation,particularlyinfulfillmentofcitizensbasicrights.

SomestudiesconductedbyPATTIROandotherinstitutionsshowthatbigdisparityoccursinpublic

servicedeliveryforfulfillmentoflocalcommunitiesbasicrights.Fewlocalgovernmentsperform

quite well,while the rest are not responsive enough. Facilitation of community involvement inpublic policymaking also finds similar problem; some local governments are inclusive to

communityparticipation,whilemanyothersarenotparticipativeandlessopen.

Democracy in context of community involvement in public policymaking and basic rights

fulfillmentatlocallevelfaces seriouschallengein futureyears.Someeffortsneed tobe takenby

PATTIRO to strengthen democracy at local level, namely: (1) facilitating strengthening of civil

societys capacity to allow them to be involved in decision making; (2) encouraging local

governmentandlegislativestoprovideroomforcommunityparticipation;and(3)strengthening

intensityofinteractionamongcivilsociety,localgovernment,andlocallegislatives.Theseefforts

areexpectedtobeabletostrengthencommunityparticipation,transparencyofpublicinformation,

andaccountabilityofstateadministratorstocivilsociety.Strengtheningofthesethreeaspectsof

governance is expected to strengthen commitment of local government and legislatives tofulfillmentofbasicrightsofcitizens.

Jakarta,January2012

IlhamCendekiaSrimarga

ExecutiveDirector


4/36

4|P a g e

BEYOND THE FESTIVAL .....

Withinthelast10years,sincereformintheendof1990s,Indonesiaexperiencesrapidgrowthin

politics, namely strengthened commitment of Human Rights, along with democratization and

decentralization.CommitmenttoHumanRightsismaterializedfromthefundamentalpart,namely

fromAmendmentofConstitution1945,makinglawonguaranteeofHumanRights,andratification

of international covenants on Human Rights. The ratified laws include covenant on Economic,

Social,andCultural(Ecosoc)rightsintoLawNo.11/2005,andCivilandPoliticalrightsintoLawNo.

12/2005.

Democratization is viewable through general election that involves many political parties, directelectionofpresidentandregionalheads,andlawsthatguaranteecommunitysrightstobeinvolved

indevelopmentplanning.

Decentralization triggers big change, as central government reduces much of its authority on

administrationatlocallevel.Authorityonmakingpolicies,developmentplans,publicservices,and

budget management, which once solely belonged to central government, now is given to local

government. Consequently, local government may produce local development plansand policies

thatreflectlocalstakeholdersaspirationsandinterests.Ontheotherhand,however,commitment

on Human Rights fulfillment becomes vary. Some of local governments are able to facilitate

communityinvolvementinlocalpolicymaking,whilemostofthemdonotshowtheircommitments

inHumanRightsfulfillmentindevelopmentplanorpolicies.

Democratization and decentralization grow rapidly, so do freedom of press and information

technologydevelopment.Thissituationallowscommunityandstateadministratorstohaveequal

opportunitytobeactorsinmassmedianews,eitherinprintedmediaoraudiovisualone.

Political party activists, civil society organization activists, and government officials have equal

opportunity in becoming someone in mass media news. Often, hot issue becomes arena of

competition among them to be important actor who contributes most in news. Consequestly,

communication tends to merely in building ones public image while destroying others. Such

situation occurs when many stakeholders use and strengthen the same approach in feeding

democracy. They cling to a belief that sending voice massively through mass media may give

broaderimpactandbenefit.Actorsofvariousissuesandintereststaketurnshowingthemselvesin

media,whiletimealsosinksthemdownfrommediaspotlight.

PATTIRO admitsthatmass media has enormous power ofspreadingissues broadlyand rapidly,

thusgivinggreatinfluence.Therefore,buildingcooperationwithmediaatnationalandlocallevelis

a very strategic move. For PATTIRO, being a media attention for multiplying impacts of issue

advocacy is very important, as well as for building existence, image, and credibility. However,

whats more urgent than reaching media attention is building democratization to strengthen

commitment of citizens rights fulfillment and decentralization to be more effectively in


5/36

5|P a g e

accommodatinglocalcommunitysrights,interests,andaspiration.Onewayofdoingthisisthroughbuildingcapacityofcivilsocietyatlocallevel.

Capacity building may be started from strengthening institution, developing capacity for

participatingin decisionmaking atlocal level,andtaking rolein monitoringto ensurethat state

resourcesgiventolocalgovernmentareutilizedtobringpeopleswelfareasmuchaspossible.It

needs concrete efforts at field level, beyond thefestival, to create empowerment and welfare of

society.

PATTIROsinvolvementinstrengtheningcivilsocietycapacityisbestdescribedinthischronology:

CivilSocietyStrengthening(20002004)Societyempowermentatcommunityandlocallevelwasstartedfromanalyzinglocalinstitutions

readiness, at demand side, as citizens. Community needs to develop their capacity in order to

accumulateaspirationininfluencingpublicpolicymakingat locallevel.Civilsocietyorganizations

atsomeregionswerefacilitatedtoexpresstheiraspirationsonproblemstheyface,andtoexpress

theirneeds.TheywerefacilitatedtobeinvolvedinMusrenbang( developmentplanningforumat

lowergovernmentlevel),havingaudiencetolocalparliamentandlocalgovernmentsworkunitson

public services, and lobbying to decisive actors of local policy. In 2004, PATTIRO developed

transition approach for community involvement, namely from noise to voice, in communicating

aspirationsofcommunity.

Civil society organizations at local level were facilitated to identify communitys problems and

needsinamoresystemicalway,sothatthesecanbefeedbackorinputofinformationbaseinpolicy

making. This measure was taken because empowered community is an important asset in local

autonomy.Authoritydelegationofdevelopmentpolicymakingandpublicserviceprovisiontolocal

government has potential of keeping development and public service benefits away from local

community.Empoweredcommunitycaninfluencedecisionmaking,beinvolvedinimplementation

enforcement,andexpresstheirdemandsinpublicaccountability.

NoisetoVoice(20042005)Inthisphase,PATTIROsoughttostrengthenthenoise

to

voiceapproachbymakingmoresystematicworksin collecting communitysaspirations andneeds. Community was facilitatedin identifying

their problems in public service delivery and in submitting complaints. Community then

encouraged local governments to develop complaint mechanism as a feedback mechanism for

improvingpublicservicequality.

PATTIROdevelopcomplaintmechanismonpublicservicebyfacilitatingcommunityinidentifying

their problems inaccessing public services. Thesecomplaintswere processedto befeedback to

SKPD (work unit of local government) and UPTD (technical unit of local government) of public

servicesandtobeproposalofcomplaintmechanismprocess.


6/36

6|P a g e

Inthisphase,PATTIROenteredtheeffortsofinfluencinglocalpolicies,bothinregulationandlocalbudget.Involvementinthisphasewasatnormativedomain,inwhichcommunitywasfacilitatedto

understand planning and budgeting mechanism, improve capacity, and develop room for

communitytobeinvolvedandinfluencebudgetallocation.

BuildingtheBridge(20052009)Inthisperiod,roomforcommunitytoparticipateinlocalpolicymakingwasopenedwider.Onthe

other hand, government at least normatively strengthened commitment of Human Rights

fulfillment.ItwassuggestedinratificationoftwointernationalcovenantsonHumanRights,namely

covenantonEconomy,Social,andCulturalrights(intoLawno.11/2005)andonCivilandPolitical

rights(intoLawno.12/2005).Inthisphase,resolutiononprogramapproachwasstrengthenedbydevelopmentofcivilsocietyinvolvementinpublicpolicymakingwithlocalgovernmentandlocal

parliament.

Threeheadedapproachwasappliedinthisphase.Theyinclude:(1)strengtheningcapacityofcivil

society to be involved in development planning and regulationmaking, (2) providing technical

assistancetogovernmenttobemorecapableofdevelopingparticipationroomforcommunityand

toadoptstandardofrightfulfillmentinpublicservice,and(3)facilitatinginteractioncivilsociety

and local policy makers, namely local executives and legislatives. One of these efforts was

implementingParticipatoryBudgetingandExpenditureTracking(PBET)programwithsomeNGOs

inIndonesia.Inthisprogram,civilsocietywasfacilitatedtoconductbudgetadvocacy,frombudget

analysis,monitorimplementation,andassessment(usingcitizenreport

card

method).

EvidenceBasedAdvocacy(20092011)Strengtheningpolicyadvocacybycivilsocietyinthisphasebecamestrongerwithevidencebased

advocacyapproach. In this approach, advocacy with CSO goes deeper and detailed as it touches

policy substance. Advocacyon law and regulation, for instance, is carried out by studying more

detailed on effectivenessclauses in regulationto ensureand regulate fulfillment ofcommunitys

rightsatlocallevel.

Budgetadvocacyalsowentdeeper,asitstudiedhowlocalbudgetalocationfulfillbasicrightsand

needs of citizens. This effort found conducive climate with the issuance of Law on PublicInformationOpenness(UUKIP)andLawonPublicService.UUKIPmakesiteasierforcivilsociety

tofindpublic documentson localbudget and itsimplementation report, asthese documentsare

importantforconductingsocialaudit.LawonPublicServiceaffirmscitizensrightinmonitoring

publicservicedelivery.[]


7/36

7|P a g e

WORKAREAS

PATTIRO develops various work areas as an effort of strengthening decentralization that is

inclusive for civil society participation and able to fulfill communitys basic rights, namely: (1)

participatoryplanningandbudgeting,(2)educationrightfulfillment,(3)healthrightfulfillment,(4)

strengtheningaccountabilityinpublicservice,(5)publicinformationopenness,(6)transparencyof

oilandgasrevenues.

1.Participatory PlanningandBudgeting

Sincethebeginning,PATTIROregardsparticipatoryplanningandbudgetingurgentissueinlocal

autonomyimplementation.Communityparticipationinlocalplanningandbudgetingisexpectedto

improveaccommodationofcommunitysrightsandaspirationsinlocaldevelopmentplan,aswell

as to ensure that there is adequate budget allocation for fulfilling communitys rights and

aspirations.

Inmid2000s, PATTIRO developedeffort of community participation building in understanding

planningandbudgetingmechanisminordertoallowthemtobeinvolvedproductively.Qualityof

communityorganizingwillimprovewhencommunityisfacilitatedtobeinvolvedinplanningand

budgetingprocesses,becauseintheseprocesses,alocationfordevelopmentresources,particularly

budget, occurs. Facilitation of community tobe involved inbudget advocacywas carried out in

planningphase, aswellasin implementationphase, that istrackingexpendituresmadeby local

government.


8/36

8|P a g e

Communityorganizingeffortinparticipatoryplanningandbudgetingiscarriedoutinparallelwitheffort of providing technical assistance to local government. Technical assistance to local

governmentisparticularlyongovernmentsneedofprovidingroomforcommunityinvolvementin

planning and budgeting process. Relevant efforts include identifying weaknesses in Musrenbang

process and suggesting improvement of guideline of Musrenbang mechanism from village to

districtlevel.

Ingeneral,technicalassistanceinparticipatoryplanningandbudgetingfollowsthesephases:(1)

mainstreamparticipationbudget,(2)propoorbudget,(3)genderresponsivebudget,(4)budgetfor

fulfilling economic, social, and cultural rights, to (5) social inclusion program, namely involving

communitythatisnotreachedbypublicservicesystemanddevelopmentprogramsprovidedby

government.

Since 2009, PATTIROs advocacy works has entered new phase, as they do not only focus on

expenditureaspect,butalsoonlocalrevenues.ItbeganinadvocacyworkinCepuBlock(inBlora

andBojonegoro,bothinCentralJavaandEastJavaprovince,respectively)ontransparencyoflocal

revenuesfromoilandgasextractiveindustry.

Synchronization of Participative, Technocratic, and Political Planning. In localplanning and

budgetingwithinfiscaldecentralizationandauthoritydelegation,therearethreetypesofplanning

that are expected to be integrated. They are participative, technocratic, and political planning.

Planning process from community through Musrenbang mechanism is rarely accommodated in

technocratic, moreover political planning phase. Technocraticplanning is oftenbureaucratic and

failstoaccommodatepeoplesaspirations;whileatpoliticalphase,budgetingprocessthatinvolves

local parliament and executives tend to represent political elites aspirations and interests. This

condition encourages PATTIROto promotesynchronization andmoreparticipativeplanning and

budgeting.

Some of PATTIROs programs attempt to address this gap through various efforts, such as: (1)

synchronizationofplanningandbudgeting,(2)promotinggenderresponsivebudgetingatnational

level,(3)encouragingcommunitytodomonitoringonbudgeting,and(4)encouraginginformation

opennessonbudgetplanning.

Process of synchronizing found political and technocratic challenges, however, they have given

positive notes and goodpractices. Oneofthem isplanningand budgetingprocess inPekalongan

District,CentralJavaProvince.AssistanceondevelopingRPJMDesinsixvillageshasbeenreplicated

bylocalgovernmenttoother272villagesinthedistrict.

Similar effortwas taken in Magelang District by maintaining effectiveness of poverty alleviation

programs through synchronization process at planning and budgeting level. On one side, this

program emphasizes participation of thepoor and marginal in planning and budgeting process;

whileontheotherside,italsoencouragesmonitoringandevaluationofeffectivenessofpoverty

alleviation programs. Synchronization and coordination process is encouraged through


9/36

9|P a g e

strengthening of TKPKD (local poverty alleviation coordination team), local government budgetteam,usingMusrenbangmechanisminPekalonganCityandMagelangDistrict.

2.FulfillmentofHealthRights

Health isone ofmainconcernsof PATTIROsprograms, because healtsis oneof citizenssrights

thatareguaranteedinInternationalCovenantonEconomic,Social,andCulturalRights.InArticle

12 (1) of the international covenant that is ratified into Law no. 11/2005, StatePartiesof this

Covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of

physicalandmentalhealth.

Amidsthealthserviceimprovementeffortstocommunitythatbecomemassivesincesecondhalfof

the2000s,PATTIROseekstofacilitatecommunityatlocalleveltobeinvolvedindevelopingbetter

health services. PATTIROalso targets localstakeholders whohaveauthority in policymakingor

haveconcernsorinterestsin,orreceivebenefitsorimpactsfromhealthservicedelivery.

Targets of PATTIROs programs in some areas include local government, local parliament, mass

media,NGOs,universities,andthepoor.Bigobjectivesbehindprogramimplementationinhealth

issueare:(1)facilitatingcapacitystrengtheningofcivilsocietyatcommunitylevel,NGOs,media,

and universities to understand communitys right to health right and states responsibility as

obligation holder; (2) supporting capacity strengthening of local government to develop better

health service mechanism and program, to be more accessible and qualified. Therefore,

state/government(asthesupplyside)canworktofulfillcommunitysneeds.

Until2010,PATTIROmakessomeimportantachievementsinhealthissuethatcanbelearned.They

are:

1. Building knowledge and strengthening capacity of civil society in submittingdemands/suggestions to local government/parliament at city/district level, in order to

encourage that policy addresses existing gaps. Efforts to achieve it include: training,

workshoponhealthbudgetanalysis,discussiononstrengtheningPosyandu(healthservice

atcommunitylevel),publicationofhealthrightissueinmassmedia,writingbookonhealth

qualityattainment,etc.

2. Supporting and strengthening state administrators to make them accountable in issuingpoliciesthatfulfillcommunitysdemandsorneedsthatrelatedtohealthservicegaps.This

effort involve workshop on formulating Health Service Standard, providing inputs to

government(Puskesmas,HealthService,Bappeda,andLocalParliament)onhealthservice

system,makinghealthbudgetproposaltoimprovehealthservice,etc.

Until2010,PATTIROworkedmostlyinlocalgoodgovernancedomain.Healthissuewasstilloneof

its main work areas, because PATTIRO views big gap between local governments efforts and

communitys expectations and needs. Decentralization erathat moves authority of health issues

fromcentralgovernmenttolocalgovernmentcannotyetbalanceitsbudgetmanagement.


10/36

10|P a g e

One of local governments obligations, namely providing health service, its delivery is stilldominated by central government. It is evident in, among other things, Jamkesmas (health

insurance for community) program. Many citizens at local level are not yet protected by this

program.Somelocalgovernmentshaveinitiativetoaddressproblemofhealthservicethatcannot

becoveredbyJamkesmas.TheyimplementJamkesda(locallevelhealthinsuranceforcommunity)

atdistrict/citylevelandJamkesosatprovincelevel.

3.FulfillmentofEducationRight

Aswellashealthserviceissue,9yearbasiceducationservicehasbeenPATTIROsconcernsince

2007,particularly thoughprogramofStrengthening of LocalStakeholders in Implementationof

InternationalCovenantonEconomic,Social,andCulturalRights.Article13(2A)oftheinternationalcovenantthat isratified into LawNo.11/2005states that Basic educationmustbeobligedand

provided free forall. This is strengthened by Law no. 20/2003 onNational Education System,

particularlyArticle34thatstatesGovernmentandlocalgovernmentguaranteefreecompulsory

education at minimum at basic

level.

Amidst dissemination and

campaign of free education in

mass media, PATTIRO with civil

society organizations in some

areasfacilitateparentstomonitor

education budget management in

learning process ateducationunit

level from planning,

implementation, to responsibility

indicationphases.

From these activities, PATTIRO can identify problems or gaps in utilization of BOS (school

operationalaid),suchaslackingofparentsinvolvementatplanningphase,implementationofBOS

fundutilizationisinconsistentwithplan,andlackingoftransparencyandaccountabilityofschool

tocommunity.Inaddition,someschoolsdonotyetprioritizeaccessofallschoolingagechildrento

haveeducationatjuniorhighschoollevel.

Basedonthesefindings,PATTIROfacilitateseducationstakeholdersatlocallevel,includingschool,

school committee,LocalEducationBoard, civilsociety organization, and local government.More

studiesonBOSfundconductedbyPATTIROfoundthatallocatedBOSfundforschooloperational

costsisnot100%.

From2010totheendof2012,PATTIROimplementedIntegrityandAccountabilityStrengthening

inSocialAidPrograms,includinginBOSprogram.Formostschools,BOSfundisthemainfinancial

sourcefor funding theiroperation,particularlythose atelementary and juniorhighschool level.


11/36

11|P a g e

Besidestudyingpolicyonprogram,PATTIROalsoresearchedtheimplementationbyschoolsandlocal governments, and community access to be involved in school planning and budgeting. To

strengthen communitys involvementPATTIRO alsofacilitatedstakeholders todosocialauditon

BOSfundmanagement.Resultsofthesocialauditareusedasrecommendationsforimprovement

ofBOSFundPrograminmanyofitsaspects:policy,implementation,andcommunityinvolvement.

4.PublicInformationOpenness

PATTIROpromotestransparencyandaccountabilityinPublicInformaitonOpenness(KeterbukaanInformasi Publik/KIP) since 2007. PATTIRO participated in giving birth of Law on PublicInformation Openness that guarantees communitys rights to find public information in stateadministration,development,andpublicservice.PATTIROsadvocacyworkswithnationalNGOsin

NationalCoallitionofFreedomofPublicInformationsuccessfullyencouragetheissuanceofLawno.

14/2008onPublicInformationOpenness.

AftertheLawisissued,PATTIROisalsoactivelyinvolvedinstrengtheningstakeholderscapacityin

implementingtheLaw.Theeffortiscarriedoutinbothsidesingovernmentsideandcommunity

side from district/city level to community level. PATTIRO makes intervention in three levels,

namely: (1) supply side (serviceprovider/government), (2) demand side (community), and (3)intermediaryside(InformationCommission).


12/36

12|P a g e

AtSupplySide,

PATTIROseffortsinclude(1)technicalassistancebyestablishingPPID(information

and documentationmanagement official) in publicbodies. PATTIROencouragedprocess of local

regulationmaking, developing SOP, and formulating public information system in local public

bodies,and(2)strengtheningPPIDcapacityinprovidingpublicinformationservicetocommunity.

These efforts involved providing trainings to public bodies at local and central level

(ministries/governmentinstitutions).

At DemandSide, the efforts include development and strengthening of communitys capacity at

community level to access necessary public information, namely through: (1) establishing

communitycentre,(2)trainingoninformationandcommunicationtechnologytoallowcommunity

toaccessandutilizeinformation,(3)facilitatingcommunitytoaccessinformationoncommodity,

market, capital, and aid programs that can be used to improve community economy, and (4)

organizingcivilsocietytorequestinformationtopublicbodies.

At intermediary side, PATTIRO is involved in strengthening independent agencies to guarantee

fulfillment of communitys right to public information. The efforts include: (1) monitoring

establishment of Information Commission at national and local levels. In this process, some

members and activists of PATTIRO are selected as Selection Team that serves to select

commissioner of provincelevel Information Commission, (2) providing assistance on capacity

strengthening of Information Commission in carrying out their tasks and duties, such as in

developingSOP(standardoperationalprocedure),disputesettlementmechanism,andinformation

disputecomplainttoInformationCommission.

At national level, PATTIRO cooperates with Ministry of Communication and Information in

disseminatinginformationofUUKIP(LawonPublicInformationOpenness)andestablishingPPID

innationallevelpublicbodies.PATTIROalsoconductstrainingandprovidestrainingmodulefor

capacitybuildingofpublicbodiesinimplementingUUKIP.

5.TransparencyofRevenuesfromOilandGasExtractiveIndustry

PATTIRO promotes transparency and accountability of revenues from oil and gas extractive

industrysectorthroughinitiationoflocalleveloilandgastransparencymechanismmodelinBlora

District (Central Java) and Bojonegoro District (East Java). PATTIRO also provides technical

assistanceto local government in makingsustainable development planthatanticipateswindfall

revenue from extractive industry sector, particularly when peak production of oil occurs.

Sustainable local development planning is important to ensure that revenues from oil and gas

industryareusedforfulfillingbasicrights,publicservices, andimprovementoffuturegenerations

quality,whilepreservingenvironmentalbalanceandquality.

Twointerventionmodelsareintroducedsince2008topreventoravoidlocalsfromhavingnatural

resourcecurse, that isregion with rich natural resourcesbut beingpovertized bycorruption and

environmental damage. Approach efforts carried out in this program have produced some

achievements,namely:


13/36

13|P a g e

1. Research on oil and gas sector revenues transparency, particularly on projection of DBH(revenuesharing)forlocalgovernmentandtrainingmoduletitled MemahamiAliranPendapatan

untukTransparansiMigas.

2. Sustainablelocaldevelopmentplanthatismadeparticipatively.Thisdocumentismadeaslocal

reference in making RPJMD (midterm local development plan) that is a guideline in making

LocalBudget.

3. Oil and Gas Transparency Mechanism Model. An Oil and Gas Transparency Commission is

establishedandlegalizedbylocalregulation,aswellashavingoperationalsupportfromLocal

Budget. This commission is an independent institution with multistakeholder membership,

working on transparency issue that includes oil and gas revenues, CSR (corporate social

responsibility)orcommunitydevelopment,andsocialandenvironmentalimpactsfromoiland

gasextractiveactivities.

4. Improvement ofcapacityof localgovernment, CSOs,and communityin understandingoil andgasrevenuesissue,CSR/Comdevprogram,andsocialandenvironmentalimpactsfromoiland

gasextractiveindustryactivities.

Atnationallevel, PATTIRO with PWYP (Publish What You Pay) coalitionare actively involved in

encouragingGovernmentofIndonesiatojoinEITI(ExtractiveIndustriesTransparencyInitiative),

until one PATTIRO activist becomes a civil society representative in Multi Stakeholder Working

GroupIndonesia.EITIisaninternationalvolunteerismstandardthatobligesextractivecompanies

andgovernmentstoreportpaymentsandrevenuesinoil,gas,andminingsectortobereconciliated

byindependentreconciliatoryandthenpublishedtopublic.

6.Strengthening

Integrity

and

Accountability

System

AccountabilityinpublicservicedeliveryhasbeenanimportantissueforPATTIROsincemid2000s,

asshowninprogramofDevelopingComplaintMechanismonCommunityBasedPublicServicein

20052007. Existence of complaint mechanism in SKPD and local government makes public

servicesmoreresponsiveandresponsibletocomplaintsfromcommunity.Thecomplaintsserveas

feedbackforpublicserviceimprovement.

Entering2009,PATTIROsoughttodevelopaccountabilitymodelineducationbudgetmanagement

inschoollevel,whichincludemanagementofBOSfund,parentscontribution,assistancefund,etc.

Accountability itself is understood as open responsibility by institution that bears the

responsibility. This is based on the idea that responsibility issue on social aid and communityempowermentprogramscanonlybecarriedoutadministratively,withoutpayingresponsibilityto

publicorcommunity.

PATTIRO considers that public service needs responsiveness and accountability of state

administrators,transparentservicemechanism,andqualifiedfeedbackfromcommunity.Topursue

them,someprogramsareimplemented,namely:strengtheningofcomplaintmechanismtopublic

service,complaintonwaterserviceviaSMS(WaterSMS),accountabilityinBOSutilizationfun,and

strengthening of accountability and integrity in implementation of education, rice, and fertilizer

subsidyprograms.


14/36

14|P a g e

PATTIROidentifiedsomeaspectsthatcontributetoaccountabilityqualityofpublicserviceprogramdelivery and subsidy/aid distrinbution, namely: existence of adequate policy framework, policy

enforcementinimplementation,andcommunityaccesstoregulationandimplementationreport.

Thesethreeaspectsareusedtoassessprogramdelivery,particularlytovaluechangeinaprogram,

namely:fundtransfer,aiddistribution,reporting,andcomplaintmechanismfromcommunityon

programimplementation.[]


15/36

15|P a g e

PATTIRORAYANETWORK

Extending reach for strengthening community participation in decentralization implementation,

PATTIRO facilitates establishment of local PATTIROs, namely in Banten Province, Serang City,

Tangerang City, Kendal District, Semarang City, Magelang City, Solo City, Gresik District, Malang

City,andJenepontoDistrict.

In the last three years, PATTIRO also facilitates some NGOs that concern community capacity

strengthening for involvement in local planning and budgeting, promoting public information

openness, and strengthening of local government accountability in public service delivery.

PATTIRO also supports process of localorganizationdevelopment,which in turn joins PATTIRO

RAYA Network, namelyLembaga Penelitiandan Aplikasi Wacana (LPAW) Blora and Bojonegoro

Institute.

PATTIRO is also strengthened by implementation team of social aid programs integrity and

accountabilitystrengtheningprograminAcehBesarandLombokBaratdistricts,andJayapuraCity.

ThefollowingiscontactaddressofPATTIRORayanetwork:

PATTIROBanten

JalanRayaPandeglangKm3Kompleks

TembongIndahRt02/01No49

KelurahanTembong,KecamatanCipocokJaya

KotaSerangProvinsiBanten

Telp:(0254)9024741

Email:[email protected]

Direktur:AgusSalim(081399777721)

PATTIROTangerang

Jl.EksekusiIVNo.16KomplekKehakiman

SukasariKotaTangerang15118Telp:(021)5537177


Direktur:Wawanudin(081317148830)

PATTIROSerang

KomplekGriyaGemilangSakti

BlokD2No5,Cinanggung,Serang,Banten

Telp:(0254)202121


Direktur:ToifurBusthomi(081906333607)

PATTIROSemarang

Jl.DurianNoIVKelurahanLamperKidul,

Semarang50249

Telp/Faks:(024)8445532


Website:www.pattirosemarang.org

Direktur:DiniInayati(085227016576)

PATTIROSurakarta

SodipanRt08Rw05,Pajang,Laweyan,Surakarta57146

Telp/Faks:(0271)7085058/7651970


Website:www.soloraya.net

Direktur:AndwiJoko(O85647301496)

PATTIROSekolahRakyatKendal

DusunJipangRT02/01Kebonadem,

Brangsong,Kendal,


16/36

16|P a g e

Telp:(0294)3687381

Email:[email protected],Website:www.sekorakyat.org

Direktur:Arifin(081326942797)

PATTIROMagelang

NgentakIIRT01RW4KelurahanSawitan

MungkidMagelangJawaTengah56511


Website:www.magelang.pattiro.org

Direktur:ErmySriArdhyanti

(08122576412)

PATTIROPekalongan

Jl.JayaBhaktiNo189B,

KelurahanMedono,Pekalongan

JawaTengah51111

Telp:(0285)4411800,7911673


Direktur:Sugiharto(081542034900)

PATTIROJeneponto

Jl.LantoDgPasewangNo.59B

BontosungguKel.Empoang

Kec.Binamu,Jeneponto,SulawesiSelatan


Website:www.pattirojeka.org

Direktur:DewiSartika(085242677337)

PATTIROAceh

Jl.KebonRajaNo.5A(belakangMKupi)

DesaIeMasen,Kec.SyiahKuala

BandaAceh.


Website:www.aceh.pattiro.org

Direktur:TeukuZulyadi(085288171216)

PATTIROMalang

Jl.AriefMargonoII/15,

KotaMalangJawaTimur

Telp/Faks:(0341)341725


Website:www.malang.pattiro.org

Direktur:AdiKhisbulWathon

(085334278894)

PATTIROGresik

Jl.JamrudXNo.18PondokPermataSuci

GresikJawaTimur61152


Direktur:NurKhosiah(085646270975)

BojonegoroInstitute

Jl.RajekwesiNo70,PerumahanRakyat,

Jetak,Bojonegoro,JawaTimur.

Telp/Fax:0353888557


Website:www.bi.or.id

Direktur:JokoPurwanto(0811313129)

LembagaPenelitiandanAplikasiWacana

(LPAW)Blora

JlMr.IskandarXIIGgDNo1

JetisBloraJawaTengah58214

Telp:(0296)533143


Direktur:DalharMuhammadun


17/36

17|P a g e

PATTIROSPARTNERS

Ford Foundation. Cooperation is mainly in

strengthening civil society to allow them to be

involvedinpublicpolicymakingatlocallevel,in

various cities/districts, namely: Serang,

Pekalongan, Semarang, Solo, Gresik, Surabaya,

Malang, etc. The cooperation is also in facilitation of civil society organization capacity

strengtheninginparticipatoryplanningandbudgeting.

Tifa Fondation. Cooperation is mainly in civil society organization

strengtheninginaccessingpublicinformationandprovisionoftechnical

assistance to local government for developing infrastructure and

mechanismofpublicinformationserviceatlocallevel.

Hivos.CooperationwiththisDutchcivilsocietyorganizationismainlyincivil

society strengthening in accessing public information. Through the

cooperation,somecommunitycentershavebeen facilitated tobe aplacefor

communitytofindpublicinformationandtocomplainonpublicinformation.

RevenueWatch

Institute

(RWI).PATTIRObeganitsworkinextractiveindustrygeneratedlocal

revenues transparency issue by cooperating with RWI in

implementingpilotprogramin2areasinCepuBlokanoiland

gas exploration area in 2 districts, namely Blora (Central Java

Province)andBojonegoro(East JavaProvince).AlsowithRWI,

TheLocalGovernmentandPublicServiceReformInitiative(LGI)

supported PATTIRO in program of economic and social

developmentinBloraandBojonegorodistricts.

European Union. Cooperation with European Union is carried out to improve

commitmentoflocalstakeholdersineconomic,social,andculturalrightsfulfillment,and

inthelastfewyears,instrengtheningaccountabilityofschoolandlocalgovernmentin

ensuringfreeandqualifiededucation.

Article XIX. Support is given by Article XIX in program of public

information openness strengthening in some districts in Banten and Central

Java provinces, research on BOS (school operational aid), and encouraging

community center to access information in public bodies.


18/36

18|P a g e

USAID. Cooperation with this US donor agency is in program of strengthening integrity and

accountabilityofstateadministratorsinpublicservice

delivery, social aid program implementation, and

provisionofgovernmentsubsidy.

NZAID. This New Zealand donor agency provides assistance to

PATTIRO in implementation of program of Local Stakeholder

Strengthening for Implementation of International Agreement on

Economic,SocialandCulturalRights.

InternationalBudgetProject(IBP).

Cooperation with this international

budgetadvocacyinstitutioniscarried

out in some events of CSO capacity

strengthening and budget advocacy,

aswellasincoalitionofbudgetadvocacyonecosocrightsinsomecountries.

TheAsiaFoundation.CooperationwithTheAsiaFoundationiscarriedoutingenderresponsive

advocacy at national scale which includes assistance to

relevantministriesandlocalscalewhichincludesorganizing

women and marginal groups to be involved in budgeting

processinvillageorcity/district.[]


19/36

19|P a g e

PUBLICATION

From2009 to2011,PATTIROhaspublishedbookson planning,budgeting,etc.Thesearebooks

publishedbyPATTIROduringthoseyears:

MengembalikanHakUmat.Author:AminSudarsonoThisbookpresentsprocessofestablishingCommunityCenteracenterfor

people gathering and advocating their rights, needs, and aspirations.

Community Center strengthening efforts described in this book are those

carried out in Pekalongan City. The Community Center then grows and

becomesNahdliyyinCenter(NC).

SinkronisasiPerencanaanDesa.Author:RohidinSudarnoandSurajiVillage developmentplanning is currently separated;every institutionhas interventionprogram

anddoesnot coordinatewitheach other.It can besaid that village is merely aplace for outer

partiestoinventtheirdevelopmentprograms.Thisbookservesasareferenceforintegratedvillagedevelopmentefforts,inwhichcommunityandvillagegovernmentmayworktogetherinidentifying

problems, deciding prioritized problems, formulating development programs, and deciding

prioritizedprogramstobeimplementedin5yearperiod,peryear,aswellasthebudgetplan.

MetodeFasilitasi:PembuatanKeputusanPartisipatif.Author:IlhamCendekia,RohidinSudarnoandSaifullah.

Facilitating community participation strengthening is an important

partofcommunityempowerment,inordertoencouragecommunitytobe more involved in development planning, regulationmaking, and

decisionmaking by themselves. This book presents methods and

techniquesoffacilitatingmeetingstoobtainparticipation,commitment,

and support from all participants. There aremethods for facilitating

discussion,brainstorming,workshop,etc.Allmethodspresentedinthis

book areaccompaniedwith case examples from PATTIROs program

experienceatnational,district,andcommunitylevels.


20/36

20|P a g e

PanduanMasyarakatMendapatkanInformasi.March2010.Author:MaryatiAbdullah.Thisbookcontainseachphaseofprocessoffindingpublicinformation.With

suchpublic information,communitycan influence local developmentplan

andclaimtheirrightstostateadministrators.Thisbookcompletesprevious

manualson improvingcommunitycapacity for findingpublic information,

whichisguaranteedinLawNo.14/2008onPublicInformationOpenness.

BerjuangdenganPenaSebuahPengantarMemahamiHakEkosobbagiJurnalis.April2009.Editor:SetyoDwiHerwanto,SyaifulArifin,SholahudinandIchwanPrasetyo.

Thisbookservesasstandardreferenceforjournaliststohaveempathyandmakeindepthnews

coverage on economic, social, and culture. This book consists of four sections, namely: first,

introductionofEcosocrightsandInternationalCovenantonEcosoc;second,onliteraryjournalism

anditsdifferencefromnewsjournalism;third,exampleofjournalismworksonEcosoc;andfourth,

attachmentofLawno.11/2005onRatificationofInternationalCovenantonEconomic,Social,and

CulturalRights.

PelibatanWargadalamProsesPenganggaranPartisipatif(Comic).December2010.Storyidea:Arifin.Author:SriAnaandAliRozikinRidlo.

ThiscomictellsastoryaboutexperienceofcommunityofDusun(subvillage)JengkolinKendalDistrict,Central

Java.Theycarriedout budget advocacywithPATTIRO

SekolahRakyatactivists.Anadvocacystoryinpictureor

comic format is expected to be easily understood by

community,whileinspiringthemtoparticipateinpro

peopleplanningandbudgeting.

MemahamiAkuntabilitasSekolah.May2010.Author:CecepSyaifullah,LukmanHakimandWidiHeriyanto.EditorMiminRukmini.

This book is a training module for school committee, student parents, and other school

stakeholders who want to create accountability of education service in school particularly in

schoolfinancialmanagement.


21/36

21|P a g e

BantuanOperasionalSekolah.August2011.Author:IskandarSharudinandLukmanHakim.This book is based on PATTIROs research experience on BOS program

policy and implementation in 9year basic education. This research

identifiedtwogaps,namely:(1)gapinproblemcomplexitywithregulation

madebygovernmenttoaddressgap,and(2)gapbetweenregulation/policy

anditsimplementationatfieldlevel.

Peta

Masalah

Pupuk

Bersubsidi

di

Indonesia.

September 2011. Author: Maryati Abdullah dan Lukman Hakim. Editor:

MiminRukmini.

This book is based on research findings on Subsidized Fertilizer program

policyanddistribution.Theprogramaimsatimprovingfarmerscapabilityin

increasingyieldoffoodandhorticultureplants.Publicationofthisbookaims

at providing information to relevant policy stakeholders and community,

particularly beneficiaries of subsidized fertilizer

program.

LaporanAlternatif

Hak

Ekosob. January 2011.Author: IlhamCendekia S.,

Markus Christian, Dati Fatimah, Hasrul Hanif, Tri Lindawati. Editor: Diah

Tantri.

This book compiles articles on fulfillment of education, health, and food

rights. First part compiles writings on education right, while second and

thirdpartcontainswritingsonhealthrightandrighttofood,respectively.

Edukasi dan Adaptasi Hak Ekosob dalam Kebijakan Daerah. January2011.Author:MiminRukmini,IlhamCendekiaS.,CitraRetnaS.,WidiHeriyanto,MayaRostanti,and

AdwinSutte.

ThisbookisatrainingmoduleforSKPD(workunitoflocalgovernment)thatservesasimportant

actorinlocaldevelopmentandpublicservicedeliveryforfulfillmentofEcosoc(economic,social,

andcultural)rights.Thisbookisexpectedtocontributeinbuildingunderstandingandcooperation

amongcitizensandstateadministratorsatlocallevelinfulfillingcitizensecosocrights. []


22/36

22|P a g e

RESEARCHEXPERIENCE

Since itsbirth,PATTIRObelievesthatresearchisanimportantpartofprogramimplementation,

including in civilsociety strengthening,technical assistanceto government institutions and local

parliament,andpolicyadvocacy.Researchesconductedwithinthelastthreeyearsare:

1. ResearchonIntegrityandAccountabilityIndexonSocialAidProgramsThisresearch is conducted to assess policy existence, effectivenessof policy implementation,

and community access to value chains which include fund transfer to service provider, aid

distribution to beneficiaries, reporting of aid distribution, and complaint mechanism value

chainsingovernmentssocialaidprograms.

Three social aid programs were studied because oftheir role in fulfillment of citizens basic

rights, improvement of peoples welfare, and poverty reduction. These programs are BOS

(school operational aid), Raskin (rice subsidy for thepoor), and Subsidized Fertilizer.These

programs show governments commitment in welfare improvement and poverty reduction

efforts.Ontheotherhand,however,theyalsoshowthatweakintegrityandaccountabilitymake

roomsforpotentialcorruptionandabusepractices,whilereducingbenefitsforcommunity.

Researchonintegrityandaccountabilityindexwasconductedin10areasinIndonesia,namely

AcehBesardistrict(Aceh),Serangcity(Banten),BandungBaratdistrict(JawaBarat),Surakarta

city,Pekalongancity,Semarangcity(JawaTengah),Gresikdistrict(JawaTimur),LombokBaratdistrict (Nusa Tenggara Barat), Jayapura district (Papua), and Jeneponto district (Sulawesi

Selatan).

This research identified weaknesses of these programs chains and formulated some

recommendations:(a)itneedsstrengtheningofmonitoringandregularexternalevaluation,(b)

improvementofcommunityaccesstoinformationofsocialaiddistribution,(c)strengtheningof

regulation on transfer mechanismand distribution at community level,and strengthening of

complaintmechanismandinformationopenness.

2. ResearchonManganeseMiningManagemerninTimorTengahUtaraDistrictThisresearchsoughttostudymanganeseminingmanagementastheminingstartedtobloom

inTimorTengahUtara(TTU)Districtin2007.Withinthelastfiveyears,thisindustrygrewfast,

andretributionfrommanganeseminingmadethelargestcontributiontolocalrevenuesofTTU

District,namely1.8billionsoftotal8billions.Inthelast3years,therehavebeen47licenseson

new mining issued, with total exploration land of 92 thousand hectare. Considering

environmental damage, high occurrence of workrelated accidents, and other harmful risks,

local government of TTU temporary halts manganese mining and seeks to find appropriate

managementformulathatmaygivemuchbenefitsforpeople,andissustainable.


23/36

23|P a g e

Problems in manganese management in TTU District are: [1] limited responsibility scope of

enterprise management. Community members may open exploration site using their own

method, and enterprises work as final processor; [2] management implementation is not

appropriate, in which community members who open mining site do not have standardized

technicalcapacity;and[3]therearenoclarityonwhoshouldbearresponsibilityonimpacts,

sincelocalgovernmentdoesnothaveinstitutionsthathandlethisissue.

To address the problems of manganesemanagement in TTU, this research recommends: [1]

extendingresponsibilityscopeofmanagementoflocalgovernment,enterprise,andcommunity;

[2] improvement in management implamentation mechanism, which can be sought through

collective agreement or regulation formulated by involvement of civil society and private

sector;[3]toensurethatthemechanismruns,thereshouldbeclarityofimpactmanagementofminingactivities; and [4]thereshould benew strategy forexit strategy bydeveloping other

sectorstobemaincontributorofandcanimprovelocaleconomyrevenues.Itcanbesoughtby

utilizinglocalrevenuesfrommanganeseminingfordevelopinglocaleconomy.

3. StudyonPlanninginP2DTKProgram1This research/study was conductedwithPattiro Institute (partner ofPATTIRO).It sought to

identify strengths, challenges, and opportunities of P2DTK Program in implementasi of

participatoryplanningapproachanditsintegrationwithregularmechanism.Thisstudyaimed

at providing inputs for program design improvement, particularly in the integration with

regular planning.This study was conducted from April to June 2011 in 10districts, namely:AcehBesarandBireun(AcehProvince),PosoandMorowali(SulawesiTengah),Sanggauand

Bengkayang (Kalimantan Barat), Halmahera Tengah and Halmahera Selatan (Maluku Utara),

TimorTengahSelatanandFloresTimur(NTT).

This study sought to identify strengths, challenges, and limitations of P2TDK Program to

develop 3 efforts: (i) Combining participatory and technocratic plannings; (ii) gathering

participatory development planning process and district development planning process

(integration with regular planning); (iii) emphasizing involvement and improvement of local

governmentscapacity.Basically,therearetwothingstoidentify:

1. How much participatory planning in P2TDK contributes to better education and healthservice delivery? This study sought to identify in more detailed on specific situation of

conflict/underdevelopedregionsthatmayinfluencethisprocess.

2. Howfarandwhatarepracticesofparticipatoryplanningintegrationtoregularplanning?Thisstudyalsosoughttoidentifyitsinstitutionalizationopportunity.

Thisstudyhasidentifiedthat:(a)Ontheroleof subprojectP2DTKonlocaldevelopment,the

program generally succeeded in strengthening development in study areas, particularly in

1 Percepatan Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Khusus an acronym of Support for Poor and Disadvantaged Area(SPADA) program.


24/36

24|P a g e

filling in the gaps caused by regular planning, however, its benefits to the poor is still

questionable;(b)onimprovementofmodelcapacity,itisconsideredasinnovationalthoughthe

implementationisoftenforformalityonly,whichmakesunoptimizedresult;and(c)on efforts

of improving quality of community proposals, it can be said that the efforts succeeded in

improvingvarietyofproposals,althoughmostproposalsareoflowqualityandhardleusedata

oncommunityproblems.[]


25/36

25|P a g e

NATIONALEVENTS

During 2010 and 2011, we held national seminars, trainings, and workshops on fulfillment of

education and health rights, public informationopenness, and transparency of oiland gas local

revenues. Seminars and workshops are organized to expose PATTIROs study results and to

facilitatenationalstakeholdersinformulatingimprovementrecommendationsforexistingpolicies.

Nationaleventsthatweorganizedduringthisperiodinclude:

SeminarandworkshoponTransparencyofOilandGasRevenues

Thisseminarandworkshop

was a cooperation work ofPATTIRO, Revenue Watch

Institute (RWI), and Lokal

Governance Institute (LGI).

Itdiscussedtransparencyof

local revenues from

extractive industry,

particularly oil and gas

industry.Seminarwasbased

on study findings and

experience on program

implementation in Blora

District (Central Java) and

Bojonegoro District (East

Java)on transparencyofoil

and gas revenues and local

governments efforts in

utilizing the revenues for

sustainable development.

This seminar was attended

by ex Chief of KPK

(Corruption Eradication

Commission) Erry Riyana

Harjapamekas, officials of

Ministry of Finance, local

parliament members,

members of Information

Commissionatcentrallevel,

scholarsofuniversities,NGOsthatconcernonbudgettransparency,andlocalgovernmentofoiland

gasproducerregions.


26/36

26|P a g e

SeminarofOurMoney,OurResponsibility

PATTIRO,PattiroInstitute,andTheAsia

Foundation (TAF) organized a seminar

titledOurMoney,OurResponsibilityin

Ibis Hotel, Jakarta, on July 23, 2010.

Discussion and book launching was

attended by the book author, Vivek

Ramkumar, from International Budget

Project (IBP), an international institutin

thatconcernsbudgetproblem.

This seminar invited speakers from

National Parliament member 2009

2014Hetifah SjSiswanda, and IlhamCendekiaSrimarga (ExecutiveDirectorof PATTIRO).Vivek

delivered a story in India that strengthens argument that it is urgent for community to find

informationofstatebudgetwhosesourceistaxesthatcommunitypays.PATTIROdeliveredtheir

experienceinconductingbudgetadvocacywithcivilsocietyorganizationsinsomeregionsfrom

community to local level. Parliament member Hetifah Sj Siswanda suggested that NGOs and

researchers inIndonesiauseNGOsexperienceinadvocacytopromoteopennessof statebudget

management,bothatnationalandlocallevels.

SeminaronEducationApanyayangGratis?

According to survey in some regions and research findings of institutions that concern

improvementofaccessandqualityoffreebasiceducation,PATTIROandPattiroInstituteorganized

aseminarthat involvednationaleducationstakeholders.TheyincluderepresentativesofNational

EducationMinistry, scholars, national parliamentmembers, and NGOs that work in basic rights

fulfillmentefforts,particularlybasiceducation(elementaryandjuniorhighschool)rights.

AccordingtostudiesfromPATTIRO,experts,andotherorganizations,financingfreeeducationthat

reliesheavilyonBOSfundandlocalgovernmentcannotyetshowcommitmentonprovidingfree

andqualified education.Onthe otherhand,BOS fundmainsourceoffunding cannot yetfulfill

school operational needs. This seminar sought to encourage government to increase BOS fund

allocationto100%ofschooloperationalneedsandencouragelocalgovernmentstoimproveaccess

toschoolforchildrenofschoolingage.

Attendingthis seminar inLeMeridienHotel,May 20, 2012,areViceMinisterofEducation,Fasli

Jalal,memberofnationalparliamentfromCommissionX,HerryAhmadi,educationobserver,Abbas

Ghozali,andresearcherfromWorldBank.


27/36

27|P a g e

SeminaronSchoolAccountability

PATTIROregardsthateducationhasenteredgoodera,namelymilestoneof20%budgetquotafor

education sector. In 2003, governmentmade a law that prohibits allocation of the 20% budget

quota for education staffs. The law has been annulled by MK (Constitution Court). Despite the

educationbudgetmilestone,thepoorsaccesstoqualifiedschoolisstilllacking.

The 20%budgetquota for education has been reached, and itdoes not seemdifficult for local

government to increase the amount. However, problems like: budget leakage, inappropriate

allocation,markup,andinconsistencyofactualandplannedexpenditure,makethebudgetquotaineffective. The key to address these problems is schools and education stakeholders full

accountability.

Seminar titled SchoolAccountability:Alternative Solutionfor EnsuringAccess of Poor Students toQualifiedBasicEducation was organized inAtlet CentutyHotel,May 12, 2010.Serving assourcepersonsofthiseventwere:AdeIrawan(ICW),H.HerryZudianto(mayorofYogyakarta),Hetifah

Siswanda, PhD (Commission X of national parliament of Indonesia), Ilham Cendekia Srimarga

(Executive Director of PATTIRO), Ian Binsar Marpaung (Staff of SubService of Basic and


28/36

28|P a g e

Intermediate Educationof EducationMinistry). Moderator of this seminar was Alvito Deannova,

presenterofTVOne.

JamboreeofInformationOpenness

It began from concern that community has low bargaining power in obtaining right to public

information.Therefore,concernonchangingthissituationisprioritized.AssuggestedinLawno.

4/2008(LawonPublicInformationOpenness),thegoalofpublicinformationopennessshouldbe

reachedandbringsbenefitstoallcommunitylevels.

NationalJamboreeofCitizenInformationisanoriginalideaofPATTIRORayaforraisingawareness

and concern of community particularly those at grassroot level on information openness

momentum.Bigexpectationofthiseventistodevelopinsightandcapacityofcitizensinaccessing,managing,andextractingimportantpointsinLawonPublicInformationOpenness.

This event was organized on May 30 June 1,2011 inPSBB MAN2 Building in Serang, Banten

Province. It was attended by hundreds participants, which include PATTIRO Raya activists and

theirassistedcommunities.Inthisevent,ExpertStaffofCommunicationandInformationMinistry,

Prof.KalamullahRamli,alsoattended.[]


29/36

29|P a g e

PARTICIPATORYMETHOD

AND

TOOLS

PATTIROs commitment and massive experience in strengthening communitys capacity for

monitoring decentralization implementation has encouraged PATTIRO to develop methods and

toolsforpromotingcommunitycapacitystrengtheningmorefocusedandeffectively.Someofthese

methods and tools are Technology of Participation (ToP), Social Audit Manual, and gender

perspectivebudgetadvocacy.

1. TechnologyofParticipation(ToP)ToPconsistsofthreefacilitationmethodstofacilitatecommunityinmakingdecision.Theyare:

ORID,WorkshopandStrategicPlanning.ORIDTechniqueisveryeffectiveformakingquickand

urgent decision while still considering views and commitments of all involved participants.

Workshoptechniqueiseffectiveforgatheringinformation,experience,andsuggestionsfromall

participantsandthentoclassifyandintegrateideasandthoughts.Strategicplanningtechnique

is applicable for facilitating community or participants to be involved fully in planmaking,

raising awareness of the importance of plan for solving problems and commitment for

implementing agreed plans. This tool has been documented and published as a book by

PATTIROin2edition,namelyin2005and2010.

2. SocialAuditManualOneofimportantcapacitiesthatcivilsocietyindemocracyanddecentralizationeramusthave

istheabilitytodemandaccountabilityandintegrityinpublicservicedeliveryparticularlyinfulfillingcitizensrights.Forthispurpose,PATTIROdevelopsSocialAudittooltoassesspublic

servicedeliveryandsocialaidprograms,particularlysocialaidprogramsforthepoor.

PATTIROidentifiesfourvaluechainaspectsinprogramimplementation,namely:fundtransfer,

aid distribution, reporting, and complaint mechanism. These four aspects are assessed and

analyzed using three indicators, namely: policy/regulation existence, implementation or

regulation enforcement,andcommunity access to policyand its implementation. Social audit

toolcanbefullyutilizedtofacilitatecivilsocietyandotherstakeholders.Thiscanbeillustrated

bythismatrix:

Policy

Existence

Policy

Effectiveness

Community

Access

Transfer A1 A2 A3

Distribution A4 A5 A6

Reporting A7 A8 A9

Complaintmechanism A10 A11 A12


30/36

30|P a g e

3. GenderBudgetModulePATTIROs experience in

budgetadvocacyatlocallevel

was begun in mid 2005,

starting from training, local

budget analysis in some

regions, submitting gender

responsive budget proposals,

and providing tools for local

stakeholders for making

budgetthatisgenderequality

responsive. The making of

genderresponsive budget

tool isbasedonconcern that

menandwomenareequalin

public and domestic affairs,

however, both sexes have

different needs and methods

in participating and usingpublic services that are

delivered by state. For

instance, budgeting process

must regard that domestic

affairs are as important as

public affairs. Both in public

and domestic affairs,

budgetingalsohastoconcern

adequatefacilitiesforwomenandmen,sothattheycanbeinvolvedandaccesspublicservices

equally.[]


31/36

31|P a g e

Awardas

Global

ThinkTank

IntheGlobalGoToThinkTanksReport2011releasedbyInternationalRelationsProgramUniversity

ofPennsylvaniaonJanuary18,2012,PATTIROisratedasthe26 thinTopThirtyTransparencyand

GoodGovernanceThinkTanks.OtherIndonesian thinktanksthatareincludedinthiscategoryare

IndonesiaCorruptionWatch(ICW),EconomicResearchInstituteforASEANandEastAsia(ERIA),

andCenterforStrategicandInternationalStudies(CSIS).

Ratingoftheseglobalthinktanksisbasedondetailedcriteria,includingresearchproductsthatare

careful and relevant, series of publication, and programs that are related to research area. The

ratingprocesshasrunsince(a)NomimnationinJune2011,(b)ratinginSeptemberNovember

2011,and(c)SelectionbyexpertpanelinNovembertoDesember2011.Inthisprocess,6,545think

tanksfromaroundtheworldhavebeenidentified.

Ingeneral,these thinkthanksexistenceisforbridginggapbetweenknowledgeandpublicpolicy.

Main objective of this rating is to acknowledge worlds main think tanks and to highlight main

contribution of these institutions to government and civil society in the world. This rating also

learnsthe success ofthink tanks in addressinggap ofparticipationand civil society persistence

withinnational,regional,andglobalscope.[]


32/36

32|P a g e

YayasanPusatTelaahdanInformasiRegional

PATTIROFOUNDATION

STATEMENTSOFFINANCIALPOSITION

AsofDecember31,2011and2010

(ExpressedinIndonesianRupiah)

NoteDecember

31,

2011

December31,

2010

Assets

CurrentAssets

CashandCashEquivalents 3a 1.024.901.856 517.594.154

Receivables 3b 148.047.667 222.519.533

Advances 3c 135.775.124 73.500.000

PrepaidExpenses 3d 177.500.000 126.000.000

TotalCurrentAssets 1.486.224.648 939.613.687

NonCurrentAssets

FixedAssets 3e

AcquisitionCosts 383.280.500 383.280.500

AccumulationDepreciation (271.838.723) (234.803.891)

BookValue 111.441.777 148.476.609

TotalNonCurrentAssets 111.441.777 148.476.609

TotalAssets 1.597.666.425 1.088.090.296

LiabilitiesandNetAssets

CurrentLiabilities

Payables 3f 316.411.289 422.856.054

TotalCurrentLiabilities 316.411.289 422.856.054

NetAssets

FundBalances: 3g


33/36

33|P a g e

Restricted 269.658.180 (297.527.226)

Unrestricted 1.011.596.955 962.761.468

TotalNetAssets 1.281.255.135 665.234.242

TotalLiabilitiesandNetAssets 1.597.666.424 1.088.090.296


34/36

34|P a g e


PATTIROFOUNDATION

STATEMENTSOFACTIVITIESRestricted

FortheyearsendedDecember31,2011and2010


Note

2011

2010

Revenue

GrantfromDonors 4a 8.428.874.421 3.849.163.558

OtherRevenues 4a 5.480.210 82.500.000

BankInterest 4a 411.400 1.161.000

TotalRevenues 8.434.766.031 3.932.824.558

Expenditures

ProgramExpenditures 4b 7.867.580.624 8.137.878.644

TotalExpenditures 7.867.580.624 8.137.878.644

ExcessofRevenuesoverExpenditures 567.185.407 (4.205.054.086)

NetAssetsReleasedfromRestrictions

RefundofRemainingFundBalance (52.562.500)

ChangesinNetAssets 567.185.407 (4.257.616.586)

FundBalances,beginning (297.527.226) 3.960.089.360

FundBalances,

ending

269.658.181 (297.527.226)


35/36

35|P a g e


PATTIROFOUNDATION

STATEMENTSOFACTIVITIESUnrestricted



Note

2011

2010

Revenue

Contributions 4a 899.762.644 1.694.185.752

OtherRevenues 4a 16.650.000 20.792.895

TotalRevenues 916.412.644 1.714.978.647

Expenditures

GeneralandAdministrationExpenses 4b 867.577.157 1.044.718.223

TotalExpenditures 867.577.157 1.044.718.223

ExcessofRevenuesoverExpenditures 48.835.487 670.260.424

NetAssetsReleasedfromRestrictions

ChangesinNetAssets 48.835.487 670.260.424

FundBalances,beginning 962.761.468 292.501.044

FundBalances,ending 1.011.596.955 962.761.468


36/36

36 | P a g e


PATTIROFOUNDATION

STATEMENTSOFCASHFLOWS



2011

2010

CashFlowsfromOperatingActivities

ExcessofRevenuesoverExpenditures 616.020.894 (3.587.356.162)

NonCashOutlays

Depreciation 37.034.832 27.205.404

ChangeinCurrentAssetsandLiabilities

Receivables 74.471.865 33.755.622

Advances (62.275.124) 16.199.084

PrepaidExpenses (51.500.000) (25.000.000)

Payables (106.444.765) 295.909.826

NetCashFlowfromOperatingActivities 507.307.702 (3.239.286.226)

CashFlowsfromInvestingActivities

Purchase(disposal)FixedAsset 1.236.800

NetCashFlowtoInvestingActivities 1.236.800

NetIncrease(decrease) inCashandCash

Equivalents

507.307.702

(3.238.049.426)

CashandCashEquivalent,beginning 517.594.154 3.755.643.580

CashandCashEquivalent,ending 1.024.901.856 517.594.154

l

annual report 2011 pattiro english version

Documents