antisense drugs to lower ldl-c & tgs: where are we now? · & tgs: where are we now? john...
TRANSCRIPT
Antisense drugs to lower LDL-c & TGs: Where are we now?
John Kastelein, MDAmsterdam, The Netherlands
Presented - August 30, 2014
ApoC-III mRNA inhibition
2
Apolipoprotein C-III
Key Regulator of Serum Triglyceride Levels
3
Phase II, Multicenter, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-
Controlled Trials in High to Very High TG Patients
4
Isis-ApoC-IIIRx Monotherapy
Significantly Reduced ApoC-III
5
6
Isis-ApoC-IIIRx Monotherapy
Significantly Reduced TG Levels
7
Isis-ApoC-IIIRx Monotherapy
Significantly Increased HDL-C
Isis-ApoC-IIIRx Added to Fibrate
Improved Overall Lipid Profile
8
Isis-ApoC-IIIRx Phase II Open-Label Cohort
FCS Patients
9
10
Isis-ApoC-IIIRx in FCS Patients
Reduced Fasting Plasma ApoC-III and TG Levels
11
Isis-ApoC-IIIRx in FCS Patients
Reduced Fasting Plasma Chylomicron-TG and ApoB-48
12
Isis-ApoC-IIIRx Phase II Summary
Across Four Patient Populations
ApoB mRNA inhibition
13
Human ApoB-100 is an Ideal Target
for a 2nd Generation Antisense Drug
• Expressed in the liver
• Essential for the synthesis and
transport of VLDL and LDL-C
• Plays a crucial role in lipid
management
• Biologically validated, but
undruggable target for small
molecules
• An apoB-100 inhibitor is predicted
to have a unique lipid lowering
profile affecting all atherogenic
lipids
• Complementary mechanism with
potential for additive effects when
co-administered with statins
• Fills an unmet medical need
Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Trials in FH PatientsSignificant Reduction in LDL-C, vs Placebo
15
Phase 3: Homozygous FH Distribution of LDL-C % Change From Baseline
% c
han
ge i
n L
DL
-C f
rom
baselin
e t
o P
ET
Raal FJ, et al. Lancet. 2010:375(9719):998-1006. PET, primary efficacy time point, 2 weeks after final dose.
MACE Rate in FH Patients
Treated for One Year with Mipomersen
The MACE rate during 2 years prior to mipomersentreatment was compared to the MACE after 1 year of mipomersen treatment in 104 patients with FH who
participated in one of three phase 3 blinded randomized placebo-controlled 6-month trials and an open-label
extension study
MACE were defined as MI, stroke, unstable angina, and revascularization procedures (PCI/CABG)
MACE occurring before randomization were identified in medical history
On-study MACE, including those for placebo-treated patients who received active drug in the open label extension, were adjudicated post-hoc by an independent committee 17
The MACE rate was significantly lower in 104 FH patients treated with mipomersen for 1 year versus the rate 24 months prior to treatment
MACE Rate Reduced in FH Patients
One Year of Treatment with Mipomersen
18
Prior (Med
Hx)
One Year on
Treatment
# events 146 6
# patients w/event 64 (61.5%) 6 (5.8%)
OR 0.033 [95% CI 0.004-0.126]
P-value <0.0001
Mean Time, months 23.9 (0.1) 11.9 (0.6)
Total Time, months 2488 1236
Rate/1000 * 25.72 4.85
* The number of patients with at least one event divided by the total follow-up time x 1000
Phase 3: Safety
On-Treatment Adverse Events & Clinical Findings
Adverse Events
Most common AEs were mild to moderate injection site reactions & flu-like symptoms
• Less than 5% discontinued due to these AEs
Clinical Findings
Transaminase increases
• 8.4% mipomersen-treated patients had ALT ≥ 3x ULN on two consecutive measures 7 days apart
No effect on liver synthetic function, i.e. total bilirubin, albumin, PT
Modest median increase in hepatic fat, which was reversible after cessation of dosing
Change from Baseline in Liver Fat Fraction Over Time
Suggestion of Adaptation that Attenuates Hepatic Fat
Accumulation
Santos et al, European Heart Journal, 2013
Summary of Benefit Versus Liver Effects
Benefit
• Sustained reductions in all atherogenic apoB-containing
lipoproteins, including LDL-C, apoB and Lp(a)
• No drug-drug interactions identified between mipomersen and
other drug therapies
• No clinical effect on other cardiovascular risk markers in
association with mipomersen treatment, including blood
pressure, fasting glucose, markers of chronic inflammation and
renal function
• MACE rate significantly lower in FH patients after one year of
mipomersen treatment compared to rate prior to treatment
Liver effects
• Elevated transaminases in some patients, but without clinically
significant changes in other measures of liver fx, e.g. bilirubin
• Stabilization or decrease in fat content with continued treatment