appendix 2 - derry city and strabane district...
TRANSCRIPT
Appendix 2
Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report
COMMITTEE DATE: 5th April 2017
APPLICATION No: LA11/2016/0944/O
APPLICATION TYPE: Outline Permission
PROPOSAL: Site for social housing development consisting of 10 no. 3 person 2 bedroom
units & 4 no. 2 person 1 bedroom units & associated works.
LOCATION: Lands at Ballygudden Road (to the rear of No's 8-22 Ballycanice Close)
APPLICANT: JJM Developments / Apex Housing Association
AGENT: Lee Kennedy
ADVERTISEMENT: 22/23 November 2016
STATUTORY EXPIRY: 06/07 December 2016
RECOMMENDATION: Refusal
REASON FOR PRESENTATION TO COMMITTEE: Housing Application – greater than 5 dwellings.
All planning application forms, drawings, letters etc. relating to this planning application are available
to view on www.planningni.gov.uk
1. Description of Proposed Development
The proposal is an outline planning application for 14 Social housing units comprising ten 3-person 2-
bed dwellings and 4 no. 2 person 1 bedroom units & associated works.
2. EIA Determination
The site does not fall within Schedule 2 of the EIA Regulations as it is less than 0.5ha; therefore an EIA
determination is not required. However, the site is hydrologically linked to Lough Foyle SPA and
Ramsar; and an appropriate assessment has been undertaken under the Habitats Regulations to
assess the potential impact of this proposal in accordance with Regulation 43 (1) of the Conservation
(Natural Habitats, etc) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1995 (as amended). SES concluded that
Appendix 2
provided mitigation is conditioned in any planning approval, the proposal would not have an adverse
effect on site integrity of any European site.
3. Site and Surrounding Area
Site location plan
The site is located within the rural countryside just beyond the development limits of Eglinton Village,
on an open and flat agricultural field. There is evidence on site that fly tipping or infilling has taken
place. Castle River abuts the north western boundary, a watercourse which is hydrologically linked to
the River Faughan and Foyle ASSI. The site is quite close to commercial properties located to the north
east. To the southern boundary is the existing Ballycanice Close housing development which backs
onto the site. The eastern boundary adjoins Ballygudden Road. There is a boundary hedge along the
roadside, however this would have to be removed for visibility splays along the Ballygudden Road
making the site more visually open.
Appendix 2
Ballycanice Close to the south of the site.
Site on the left of photograph when looking towards A2
Appendix 2
Internal view of the site
4. Site Constraints
The site is in close proximity to an existing gas pipeline. Health and Safety Executive NI have been
consulted on the application, see later section in this report.
5. Neighbour Notification Report
Neighbour Address Date Neighbour Notified
10 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
11 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
12 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
13 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
Appendix 2
14 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
15 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
16 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
17 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
18 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
19 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
20 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
21 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
22 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
6A St. Canices Park Muff Eglinton Londonderry BT47 3AQ
11/21/16
6B St. Canices Park Muff Eglinton Londonderry
11/21/16
Appendix 2
BT47 3AQ
6C St. Canices Park Muff Eglinton Londonderry BT47 3AQ
11/21/16
6D St. Canices Park Muff Eglinton Londonderry BT47 3AQ
11/21/16
8 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
9 Ballycanice Close Muff Londonderry Londonderry BT47 3HH
11/21/16
6. Relevant Site History
LA11/2015/0499/PAD – A pre-application discussion was held on this site where advice was given by
Council officials that the principal of a housing development in the rural countryside was not
acceptable. The relevant plan and policy constraints were highlighted to the agent, who was advised
that if an application was to be submitted in all likelihood the proposal would be presented to the
Planning Committee of Derry City and Strabane District Council with a recommendation to refuse
permission.
7. Policy Framework
RDS 2035:
Policy SFG7 Strengthen the role of Londonderry as the Principal city of the North West; Meeting
the Housing needs of the area.
Policy RG8: Manage housing growth to achieve sustainable patterns of residential development.
Appendix 2
Derry Area Plan 2011 - The site is located on the Ballygudden Road outside the defined settlement
limit of Eglinton Village, wholly within the rural countryside.
PPS 3 Access Movement and Parking - Transport NI has provided a list of conditions should this
proposal be approved.
PPS 7 Quality Residential Environments - Planning seeks to achieve residential developments that
promote quality and sustainability in their design and layout, are in harmony with their townscape
or landscape setting and which will ultimately make a positive contribution to the character and
appearance of the country’s settlements. Policy QD 1 of this PPS lists the criteria to be met by
housing schemes and requires the submission of a Design Concept Statement demonstrating how
the scheme will meet these criteria.
PPS 15 Planning and Flood Risk - Looks at the possible sources of flooding and potential flood risk
which need to be considered.
Planning Policy Statement 21 – This policy statement sets out the main planning considerations in
assessing proposals for development in the countryside.
Creating Places: Achieving Quality in Residential Developments – This sets out the guidance for
creating quality and sustainability through design of all new residential developments.
8. Consultee Responses
Health and Safety Executive NI – the site is within 300 metres of the N-W gas pipeline, close to the
way leave distance. Guidance has been given regarding contacting the pipeline operator before
determining the application regarding any legal and safety issues.
NIEA Natural Environment Division –require additional information regarding the potential impacts
on natural heritage by completing a biodiversity checklist. This has not been submitted.
Water NI – the proposal is considered acceptable with standard informatives provided.
Shared Environmental Services – negative conditions have been provided to mitigate environmental
concerns so that the proposal will not have an adverse effect on any European sites.
Transport NI – conditions have been provided in the event of an approval
Loughs Agency – conditions have been provided in the event of an approval
Appendix 2
Rivers Agency – Part of the site is within the Q100 floodplain and from a visual inspection there
appears to be infilling on site. Planning do not deem this an exception to FLD 1 of PPS 15 and therefore
have not requested a Flood Risk Assessment to be submitted. Due to the size and nature of the
development, FLD 3 applies and a Drainage Assessment would be required. This has not been
requested or submitted from the agent.
Environmental Health – requested a noise impact assessment due to commercial units in the area
and the A2 road. This has not been requested or submitted from the agent.
9. Representations
One representation has been received from Mark H Durkan MLA, supporting the application for social
housing.
10. Planning Assessment, including Other Material Considerations
Section 6(4) of The Planning Act (Northern Ireland) 2011 requires the Council to make planning
decisions in accordance with the local development plan, unless material considerations indicate
otherwise. Therefore, this proposal has been assessed against the provisions of the Derry Area Plan
2011, as well as other material considerations including the Regional Development Strategy; the
Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland; PPS 15 Planning and Flood Risk; PPS 7 Quality
Residential Environments; PPS 3 Access, Movement and Parking, and supplementary guidance in
‘Creating Places’, as well as consultation responses and the representation received. The policy
consideration is set out below;
Derry Area Plan 2011
The site lies outside the development limit of Eglinton Village and is therefore is located within the
countryside. Paragraph 2.6 of the DAP states there beyond the city limits there is a presumption
against further urban development. The function of the development plan is to provide sufficient
land to facilitate growth whilst protecting the open countryside from urban sprawl and ribbon
development (paragraph 3.1). The Area Plan further states in paragraph 3.3 that within the
countryside there will be a clear presumption against any new building and new use of land which
might create a demand for more buildings and no other development will normally be allowed unless
there are over-riding reasons why that development is essential and could not be located in a town.
In the context of Eglinton there is a surplus amount of available land suitable for housing which has
not yet been developed within the limits. Some of this land has planning permission or current
planning applications. The Council is currently processing an application for the redevelopment of 19
Appendix 2
Main Street Eglinton to provide 19 residential units; there is also a considerable amount of land
located to the south east of the Village with 5.2 hectares currently on the market for sale, this
potentially could provide up to 200 units. There is also a large amount of land off the Carmoney
Road which conservatively could provide 40 dwellings. The map on the next page shows the main
‘white land’ remaining within the settlement and available land. There is clearly not a justification for
permitting this housing outside the development limits.
The current application for a housing development in the countryside is therefore contrary to the
Derry Area Plan 2011 (DAP). This fundamental departure from the Plan would create an undesirable
precedent for development on other lands outside the development limit. There are no over-riding
reasons why the development is essential and could not be located in the village, this is further
supported by policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21 Sustainable Development in the
countryside as set out later in this report.
Planning Policy Statement 21 Sustainable Development in the Countryside
Policy CTY 1 Development in the Countryside
As this site is beyond the development limits of a settlement, Policy CTY 1 ‘Development in the
Countryside’ applies. The proposal does not meet any of the exceptions to policy that could be
considered acceptable in the countryside. There are no overriding reasons why this housing
development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within the village where
there remains significant portion of ‘white land’ within the village limits. The application is therefore
contrary to CTY 1.
Appendix 2
Site Location (Top Right) and opportunity sites in Eglinton Village
Policy CTY5 Social and Affordable Housing
Policy CTY 5 states that Planning permission may be granted for a group of no more than 14
dwellings adjacent to or near a small settlement or within a designated Dispersed Rural Community
to provide social and affordable housing to meet the needs of the rural community. Planning
permission will only be granted where the application is made by a registered Housing Association
and where a demonstrable need has been identified by the Northern Ireland Housing Executive
which cannot readily be met within an existing settlement in the locality.
The proposal is for a total of 14 dwellings, on a site adjacent to the Village limits. Eglinton is not
classified as a ‘small settlement’ of less than 2250 as required by the policy, it is a Village with a
population of approx. 4500, nor is it a Dispersed Rural Community.
The application was not made by a registered Housing Association but by a combined private
developer, JJM Developments and Apex; and no letter has been received from the Housing Executive
Appendix 2
to confirm that there is a funding commitment or programme priority, or a demonstrable need for
these dwellings outside the village limits. As stated above, there is a surplus amount of available land
within Eglinton that could accommodate the proposed development.
The supporting statement received by the agent has been considered in detail, however, as CTY 5
does not apply to this proposal then the statement has not been given determining weight. The
sequential test in terms of location only apply to sites outside a small settlement; as stated above
Eglinton is not classified as a ‘small settlement,’ it is designated as a ‘Village’ in the Derry Area Plan
2011.
Policy CTY 5 is therefore not relevant to this application proposal.
Policy CTY 15 The Setting of Settlements
Policy CTY15 states that planning permission will be refused for development that mars the
distinction between a settlement and the surrounding countryside or that otherwise results in urban
sprawl. The principle of drawing a settlement limit is to partly promote and partly contain new
development within that limit and so maintain a clear distinction between the built up area and the
surrounding countryside. This development proposal would result in the creation of urban sprawl
outside the limits into the countryside, which is unacceptable.
Photo showing the sites rural context. The proposed development would cause urban
sprawl into the countryside
Appendix 2
PPS 7 Quality Residential Environments: Policy QD1 Quality in new Residential Development
This is an outline application and therefore a concept plan for the site is required to be submitted.
Whilst detailed plans are not required for an outline application, the indicative layout is still to be
considered against the criteria set out in QD 1.
Concept map submitted with outline application
I would contend that criteria (a) and (h) have not been met for the following reasons.
(a) In terms of character a housing development does not respect the surrounding context of the
area, in that the proposal is introducing a housing development into an area of rural character. The
site extends further into the countryside creating a harsh elevation of rear privacy fencing that does
not soften or integrate the development within its rural context, this is inappropriate to the
character of the rural area.
(h) The orientation of the housing including the internal access road will conflict with the Ballycanice
Close development in terms of overlooking from the front elevations of the proposed two storey
dwellings. There will be noise disturbance from the access road which will run along the private back
gardens of Ballycanice Close and other disturbance caused by car lights at night. It should be noted
Appendix 2
that there are at least 8 parking spaces on the boundary with Ballycanice Close that will directly
disturb the rear private gardens of the existing residents.
Therefore the proposal has failed to meet criteria (a) and (h) and is therefore contrary to PPS 7.
PPS 15 Planning and Flood Risk – Rivers Agency in there consultation reply identified possible
infilling on site with a berm running through the centre of the site. The western boundary of the site
is located along the Castle River which is a designated watercourse and is affected by the Q100
floodplain, therefore, Rivers have asked if this is treated as an exception to the policy then a Flood
Risk Assessment (FRA) should be submitted under policy FLD 1. As the development is not an
exception under FLD 1 then the proposal is contrary to policy. An FRA has not been requested from
the agent. The application has also not been submitted with a Drainage Assessment as is required
for a development of this size under policy FLD 3, and is therefore also contrary to policy.
The proposal is contrary to PPS 15 policies FLD 1 and 3.
Social Housing Need
The Supporting Statement from the agent has been considered and planning officials are of the
opinion that this does not outweigh the policy constraints for this proposed housing development of
14 units within the countryside, for the reasons as set out and detailed above in this report. It is
understood that there is a need for social housing in Eglinton, which by the agent’s statement is a
requirement of 30 unit’s between 2015 and 2020.
Whilst No letter has been received from the NIHE to support this application or to confirm need on
this particular site outside the limits; the supporting statement has included an e-mail from the
housing executive which is non-committal and advises that will only look at the scheme in more
detail if it “is at a more advanced stage”. Given that there is the potential for at least 260 units
within the development limits of Eglinton Village, there is no need to build this proposed housing
development in the countryside as there is a surplus amount of available land suitable for housing
within the village limits, which can accommodate housing in a more sustainable manner that
complies with the Area Plan and Policy.
Appendix 2
13 Acres of development land for sale within Eglinton Village at Ballygudden Road
11. Conclusion and Recommendation
In summary, the proposed development of 14 dwellings within the countryside is contrary to the
Derry Area Plan 2011, as well as being contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement, PPS 21
(Sustainable Development in the Countryside), PPS 7 (Quality Residential Environments) and PPS 15
(Planning and flood Risk).
Other material considerations have been taken into account of, including the need for social housing,
and the representation received, but none are such as to justify this proposal which is contrary to the
Area Plan.
It is therefore recommended that the Council’s Planning Committee Refuse planning permission for
the proposed development for the following reasons:
Appendix 2
1. The proposal is contrary to 'The Derry Area Plan 2011' as the proposed site lies outside the
limit of development located on a Greenfield site in the rural countryside.
2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland
(SPPS) in that the proposed development does not manage housing growth in a sustainable
way, as the site lies outside the development plan’s limit for development.
3. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY1 of Planning Policy Statement 21,
Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this
development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
4. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY15 of Planning Policy Statement 21,
Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the development would if permitted
mar the distinction between the defined settlement limit of Eglinton and the surrounding
countryside thereby resulting in urban sprawl.
5. The proposal is contrary to Policy QD1 of Planning Policy Statement 7 (PPS7) Quality
Residential environments, criteria (a) and (h) in that the proposal does not respect the
character of the site; there is the potential for overlooking onto the existing dwellings at
Ballycanice Close Park; and the proposed development is likely to have an adverse impact on
adjoining existing properties by way of noise and light disturbance.
6. The proposal is contrary to PPS 2 Natural Heritage in that it has not been demonstrated
there will be no impact on protected species; badgers and otters.
7. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the noise impacts from all noise sources within
the locality have been adequately addressed and there is insufficient information provided
to demonstrate that will not adversely impact on the amenity of the proposed dwellings.
8. The proposal is contrary to PPS 15 FLD 1, in that part of the site is located within the
floodplain and the development is not an exception to policy.
9. The proposal is contrary to PPS 15 FLD 3 in that sufficient information has been provided to
assess the potential risk from surface water flooding.
Appendix 2
Site Visit
A visit to the site was requested by Members at the Planning Committee on 8th March.
This visit was undertaken on Monday 27th March.
In attendance:
A McNee (Planning Officer)
J Duffy (Planning Officer
Cllr C Jackson
Alderman D Thompson
Cllr T Hasson (Met at site)
The Planning officials and Cllr Jackson and Alderman Thompson travelled to the site by mini bus from
the Guildhall and arrived at the site at approx. 10.30 am. They were met on site by Cllr Hasson who
had travelled to the site by car.
The Members viewed the application site from the proposed entrance to the site from Ballygudden
Road. The case officer explained to Members where the site was and showed the plans of the
proposed layout of housing on the site. Members and officials boarded the bus at approx. 10.45 and
left the site. Members drove up Ballygudden Road as they requested to see other land which was
inside the development limits of Eglinton Village. No one got off the bus at this stage. The bus then
returned to the Guildhall.