asian disaster preparedness center (adpc) center for environmental planning and technology (cept)
DESCRIPTION
Gujarat Study A Regional Experience of Accessing Socio Economic Impacts of natural disasters A Study for GSDMA by. Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC) Center for Environmental Planning and Technology (CEPT) Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai (IIT, Bombay) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Gujarat StudyGujarat Study
A Regional Experience of Accessing Regional Experience of Accessing Socio Economic Impacts of natural Socio Economic Impacts of natural
disastersdisasters
A Study for GSDMA
byAsian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC) Center for Environmental Planning and Technology
(CEPT)Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai (IIT, Bombay)UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the
Caribbean (UNECLAC)
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Disasters and Economic Growth Trends in Gujarat
Though Gujarat is one of the most developed states of the country yet it is still much less than its potential.
The average annual compound growth rate of Gujarat • in 60’s - 3.32% per annum.
• In 70’s - 4.95% per annum.
• On this potential the rate of growth of Gujarat in eighties was projected to grow over at the rate of 6% per annum.
• In 80’s - 4.26% actual only.
The major reason for not achieving its full potential in eighties was several repetitive natural disasters. Similarly, the average annual compound growth rate of GSDP increased to over 9.57% per annum between 1990-91 to 1997-98 - the highest in the country.
Gujarat couldn’t sustain the same pace in the late nineties again because of the several repetitive natural disasters.
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Disasters in GujaratDisasters in GujaratYear Drought Floods Cyclone Earth
quake
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Impact of Disasters on Economic Impact of Disasters on Economic DevelopmentDevelopment
-5
0
5
10
15
20
1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03
An
nu
al G
SD
P G
row
th R
ate
, %
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
The Need to
Improve ability of Gujarat Government and local bodies
- To estimate rehabilitation and reconstruction financial requirements and to mobilize grants and loans
- To recover costs incurred in providing relief assistance
Improve ability for delivery of assistance to affected population based on scientifically-based damage and loss assessments;
Improve capacity to demonstrate the negative impacts of disasters on the economy and development of the State, and to argue the case for undertaking damage mitigation and vulnerability reduction (i.e. to advocate disaster-resilient development).
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Hence The Need For A Comprehensive Methodology
for Damage and Loss Assessment For Gujarat
Commissioned by GSDMA under GEERP
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Overview of the Study Activity 1: Institutional Mechanisms
and Training Needs for Damage and Loss Assessment
Activity 2: Improving Methodology for Damage Assessment
Activity 3: Developing Methodology for Loss Assessment
Activity 4: Capacity Building for Damage and Loss Assessment
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Damage Assessment Methodology
Primary focus is on condition of physical assets:• Buildings
• Roads and Bridges
• Water supply and sanitation structures
• Dams and other irrigation structures
• Industrial facilities (including power plants)
• Ports and other coastal structures
• Electrical and Communications system structures
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Objectives of Damage Assessment
Short-Term:
• To quickly identify the safety and usability of buildings, critical services structures and infrastructure
• To quickly estimate total damage (for reporting and policy purposes)
Medium-Term (buildings only):
• To assess status of doubtful category structures
• To reassess and quantify damage categories
Long-Term:
• To help develop rehabilitation/retrofitting procedures
• To help identify deficiencies in technical knowledge and its implementation mechanisms
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Key considerations for DA Should be based on international sound-practices
Should consider the types of structures prevalent in local context
Should consider the technical skills likely to be available after a disaster
Should incorporate experiences from recent disasters
Consistent and Minimize ‘perception’ based qualitative assessments
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Damage Level (%)
HAZUS-99 FEMA-273EMS-98 / MSK-64
ATC-13 ATC-20
0 No-Damage Limit State
10
Slight Damage
Immediate Occupancy
Grade 1 Slight
Green Tag20
Grade 2 Light30
40 Damage Control50
Moderate Damage
Grade 3Moderate
Yellow Tag60
Life Safety70
Heavy80Extensive Damage
Limited Safety
Grade 490 Near CollapseRed Tag
100 Partial Collapse Major
Collapse Limit State
Comparative damage categorization of International practices
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Damage Level (%)
HAZUS-99 FEMA-273EMS-98 / MSK-64
ATC-13 ATC-20
0 No Damage Limit State
10
Slight Damage
Immediate Occupancy
Grade 1 Slight
Green Tag20
Grade 2 Light30
40 Damage Control50
Moderate Damage
Grade 3Moderate
Yellow Tag60
Life Safety70
Heavy80Extensive Damage
Limited Safety
Grade 490 Near CollapseRed Tag
100 Partial Collapse Major
Collapse Limit State
Multiple methods arerequired to satisfy
overlapping objectives
1.3 Comparative damage categorization of International practices
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Proposed Methodology for DA of Buildings
Three-Stage Damage Assessment Methodology proposed
Rapid Safety Assessment
Detailed damage categorization (S-0 to S-5, NS-A to NS-D)
Detailed Engineering Evaluation
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Damage Assessment for Infrastructure
Some structures like Bridges and Storage Reservoirs are low redundancy structures – collapse may be sudden and catastrophic
Structural repairs are based on technically detailed evaluation – Method should be technically rigorous
Damage assessment likely to be carried out by technical persons from the responsible line departments
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Loss Assessment Methodology Presently no professionals available with most of
department to undertake analysis on loss assessment.
For Loss Assessment Information is required on:
Decreased output in the production sectors of agriculture, industry and commerce.
Increased expenditure and decreased revenues in the revenue State Govt account and private enterprise providing basic services.
Increased investments for rehabilitation and reconstruction in the State government development accounts.
Many State institutions and private enterprises do collect the basic data required to enable the estimation of losses but used for other purposes. Limited analysis done for estimating indirect losses.
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
The ECLAC Handbook for The ECLAC Handbook for Disaster AssessmentDisaster Assessment
url://www.eclac.org/mexico
Adaptation
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Proposed Loss Assessment Methodology
Sector-by-Sector Loss Assessmenti. Productive Sectors
• Industry• Trade and Commerce• Agro-based Industry and Commerce
ii. Social sectors• Housing• Health• Water Supply and Sanitation• Education
iii. Infrastructure• Electricity• Water Resources• Transport and Communications
Macro-Economic Effects
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
D&LA in Agriculture SectorExisting Methodology – 2 stage assessment
First Stage Assessment Damage data based on “Eye estimates”
Estimates do not capture mid season agricultural adjustments
A review of crop damage assessment procedures is required
Final Assessment
“Aanawari means an assessment of the observed and estimated crop out-turn of all crops a village as compared with an assumed
standard.”
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Proposed Methodology for Agriculture Sector
Six-stage loss estimation – geared to facilitate mitigation measures
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Reporting Format – Sample by dept/by sector
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Institutionalizing D&LA Methodology
Standardization of formats for assessing and reporting damage so as to have a consistent representation of losses due to a given disaster
Capacity Building of key personnel in use of the standardized formats
Establishment of focal points in each line department for damage and loss assessment
Establishment of a base line inventory of assets in each department and updating annually
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Institutionalizing D&LA Methodology..
Creation and maintenance of departmental Databases of disasters and impacts
Computerized system for easy aggregation, dis-aggregation and historical analysis for decision making
Government orders for confirming additional responsibility for each focal point
Handbook in local language for Users
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Capacity Building for D&LA Sector-wise assessment teams pre-identified and
trained
Teams to comprise of subject-experts from relevant departments
Volunteer network of private sector engineers to be established for Damage Assessment
Professionals of several disciplines – including, but not limited to, engineering and economics, at State and District levels, to receive special training in use of the loss assessment methodology
Gu
jara
t S
tud
y o
n D
am
ag
e a
nd
Loss A
ssessm
en
t M
eth
od
olo
gy
Thank YouThank You