astrodynamics tools and techniques (icatt) dynamic … · 1:35, reasonable for 1 m s/c size level;...
TRANSCRIPT
© GMV, 2016 Property of GMV
All rights reserved
DYNAMIC TEST FACILITIES AS ULTIMATE GROUND VALIDATION STEP FOR SPACE ROBOTICS AND GNC SYSTEMS
6th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
ASTRODYNAMICS TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES (ICATT)
Pablo Colmenarejo, Emanuele di Sotto, Juan Antonio Béjar
March 17th, Darmstad, Germany
© GMV, 2016
OUTLINE
Dynamic test facilities role within DDVV cycle
GMV’s platform-art description
Supported scenarios
Some examples of platform-art validation use cases
2016/03/17 DYNAMIC TEST FACILITIES AS ULTIMATE GROUND VALIDATION STEP FOR SPACE ROBOTICS AND GNC SYSTEMS Page 2
© GMV, 2016
DYNAMIC TEST FACILITY ROLE WITHIN DDVV
An already proven efficient approach for the Design, Development, Verification and Validation (DDVV) approach for GNC related technologies is based on an incremental testing fidelity paradigm MILSIL PIL HIL:
– MIL: based on the use of a Functional Engineering Simulator (FES), including environment SW models and reference models of the selected on-board algorithms (GNC, AMM, FDIR). Verifies algos correctness.
– SIL: autocoded/hand made on-board GNC SW integrated in the MIL. Verifies algos SW coding correctness.
Page 3 2015/10/14
DYNAMIC TEST FACILITIES AS ULTIMATE GROUND VALIDATION STEP FOR SPACE ROBOTICS AND GNC SYSTEMS
GNC Require-ments
GNC Design
GNC Prototype
Generation
Auto Code Generation
Software in the Loop
(SIL)
Hardware in the loop
(HIL)
Final GNC SW at TRL 5 Level
Design
Development
Validation
Processor in the Loop
(PIL)
Model in the Loop
(MIL)
FES sim
Dynamic HIL/ Sensors TB platform®
PIL Real-Time
– PIL: on-board GNC SW integrated in space-representative avionics. Verifies SW correctness vs. real-time OS and platform.
– Dynamic HIL: includes real sensors with air-to-air stimulation. Verifies system correctness vs. real HW (e.g. sensors, point-to-point IFs).
© GMV, 2016
GROUND VALIDATION ON DYNAMIC TEST BEDS
platform-art is the GMV’s Dynamic Test Bench with real air-to-air metrology stimulation
Allows use of sensors measurements in the loop through the recreation of relative trajectory and attitude profile by using robotic arms
Sensors installed on-board the mock-ups experiment the same relative kinematics and produce the same measurements as in space environment
Chaser metrology
Left:Lidar,
Right: visual camera
Earth Servicing (docking) scenario
target mock-up
2016/03/17 DYNAMIC TEST FACILITIES AS ULTIMATE GROUND VALIDATION STEP FOR SPACE ROBOTICS AND GNC SYSTEMS Page 4
PRISMA TANGO mock-up
© GMV, 2016
platform-art® FEATURES SHORT DESCRIPTION
Functional features:
– Dynamic test bench with real air-to-air metrology stimulation
– Raises the GNC S/S (SW+sensors) validation till level 5/6 (ESA scale)
– Two numerically controlled robotic arms + 16 m length rail, allowing:
• Short-range RdV and FF scenarios (up to 525 meters using scalability factor 1:35, reasonable for 1 m S/C size level; can be higher for bigger S/C), including GNC mode transition, scenario stop/resume, change of sensors, …
• Robotics/rovers scenarios by platform-art configuration update
Performance features:
– Dynamic range: 18 m
– Accuracy: O(0.1 mm) (FARO laser tracker calibration)
– Resolution: < 0.01 mm
– Repeatability: < 0.1 mm
– Mock-ups (Inc. metrology): up to 1 m size, 150 kg
– Darkness: full darkness room (optical spectrum)
– Illumination: space representative at optical spectrum
– Location/Access: GMV head-quarters (Tres Cantos, Madrid)
Page 5 2015/10/14
DYNAMIC TEST FACILITIES AS ULTIMATE GROUND VALIDATION STEP FOR SPACE ROBOTICS AND GNC SYSTEMS
© GMV, 2016
Motion Facility: GMV’s platform-art® test bench
Ether
net L
ink
Real-time PIL test bench components
Motion Control System(RTOS)
Ethernet
Link
Physical Simulation & Testing Links
Development, Monitoring or
Debugging LinksPH
S-CAB5
Target Processor(LEON)
Serial or Ethernet Link
OBC monitoring and debugging system
(GRMON)
Serial or Ethernet Link
PCI o
r Ser
ial L
ink
Development, monitoring and debugging system
(RTW, RTI and Control Desk)
Real-Time Simulator(dSpace)
Ether
net L
ink
Operator
6-DOF Large (16 m) Dynamic Illumination
System
0
KUKA KR C2Controller(VxWorks)
Radio Links
Ethernet Switch
RS42
2
Target S/C
Mock-up
KUKA KR C2Controller(VxWorks)
0
Power
&dat
a
Line
KUKA
KR 150-2
KUKA
KR 150
Auxiliar manipulator for inspection/
capture scenario
Sensors & grasping inter-changeable
devices
Options:a) Camera/LIDARb) Manipulator
Mounting
option
Track Motion System (16 m)
platform-art ARCHITECTURE
2016/03/17 Page 6 DYNAMIC TEST FACILITIES AS ULTIMATE GROUND VALIDATION STEP FOR SPACE ROBOTICS AND GNC SYSTEMS
platform-art®
_MECHATRONICS
(FIXED CORE)
platform-art®_AVIONICS (EXCHANGEABLE/TAILORABLE)
platform-art®_SENSORS (default SENSORS by GMV)
(specific SENSORS by CUSTOMER)
3
2
1
© GMV, 2016
platform-art ELEMENTS AND FEATURES
2016/03/17 Page 7 DYNAMIC TEST FACILITIES AS ULTIMATE GROUND VALIDATION STEP FOR SPACE ROBOTICS AND GNC SYSTEMS
platform-art system elements:
• Real time simulator (dSPACE board): I/F with motion control system, Real World and relative kinematics computation
• Target processor (LEON): GNC on-board SW execution
• Development, monitoring & debugging systems
• KUKA KR150-2: 6 DOF robotic arm - Target satellite trajectory reproduction - Communication delay < 12ms
• Mitsubishi PA10: 6 DOF for manipulation purposes - Communication delay < 1ms
• Motion control system: - sends control commands to the robotic arms - security checks on arms kinematics
• Sensors I/F:
- Ethernet UDP/IP
- Serial port (RS-232, RS-422)
- CAN
1
• KUKA KR150/Rail: 7DOF system - 6 DOF robotic arm - 7th DOF provided by a 16m rail track - Chaser satellite trajectory reproduction
• Illumination : 6-DOF 16 m length cartesian system • S/C mock-ups
- Representative in shape and materials of the target spacecraft
2
3
AVIONICS
MECHATRONICS
SENSORS
• Default sensor: - Optical navigation camera by GMV
• Customer sensors (examples of use): - ILT LIDAR by Jena Optronik - VBS by DTU
© GMV, 2016
SUPPORTED SCENARIOS
platform-art can be used for the following scenarios:
Rendezvous
Formation Flying
In-Orbit Servicing
In-Orbit capture (e.g. MSR)
Active Debris Removal
Relative navigation for planetary/asteroid landing
2016/03/17 DYNAMIC TEST FACILITIES AS ULTIMATE GROUND VALIDATION STEP FOR SPACE ROBOTICS AND GNC SYSTEMS Page 8
© GMV, 2016 2016/03/17 DYNAMIC TEST FACILITIES AS ULTIMATE GROUND VALIDATION STEP FOR SPACE ROBOTICS AND GNC SYSTEMS Page 9
VALIDATION USE CASES WITH platform-art iGNC: Approach/capture of Sample Container in Mars (MSR mission)
© GMV, 2016
VALIDATION USE CASES WITH platform-art
NEO-GNC-2
Vision-based GNC system for Descent and Landing on NEO Asteroids
GNC+IP implemented on space representative avionics
End-to-end validation with breadboard of space qualified Navigation Camera in GMV’s platform-art dynamic TF.
2016/03/17
DYNAMIC TEST FACILITIES AS ULTIMATE GROUND VALIDATION STEP FOR SPACE ROBOTICS AND GNC SYSTEMS Page 10
Nav Camera images with
tracked features
© GMV, 2016
VALIDATION USE CASES WITH platform-art
2016/03/17 DYNAMIC TEST FACILITIES AS ULTIMATE GROUND VALIDATION STEP FOR SPACE ROBOTICS AND GNC SYSTEMS Page 11
© GMV, 2016 2016/03/17 DYNAMIC TEST FACILITIES AS ULTIMATE GROUND VALIDATION STEP FOR SPACE ROBOTICS AND GNC SYSTEMS Page 12
VALIDATION USE CASES WITH platform-art
© GMV, 2016
CONCLUSIONS
2016/03/17 DYNAMIC TEST FACILITIES AS ULTIMATE GROUND VALIDATION STEP FOR SPACE ROBOTICS AND GNC SYSTEMS Page 13
Dynamic test facilities can be very valuable and cost-effective resources for maturing and raising the GNC related (and others) technologies/systems/sensors TRL level
GMV’s platform-art has been used in the last 10 years in about 20 (internal and ESA/national agencies) activities with success and providing valuable validation support.
Wide spectrum of applications have been already demonstrated: planetary/asteroid descent and landing, on-orbit servicing, active debris removal, Rendez-Vous and capture in Mars.
Key issues are:
– Appropriate knowledge of the scenarios/technologies to be tested and appropriate matching with the laboratory tuning/set-up capabilities.
– Not all the laboratory characteristics are equally relevant for all types of scenarios (e.g. scale factor/calibration, illumination, real-time, communication delays, distributed processing, …).
– Laboratory modularity and configuration flexibility: typical platform-art required preparation/set-up for new scenario is 2-4 weeks.
© GMV, 2016 Property of GMV
All rights reserved
Thank you!
www.gmv.com