auditor performance framework peter crookes, scheme audit and assurance
TRANSCRIPT
Auditor Performance FrameworkPeter Crookes, Scheme Audit and Assurance
2
Audits are a principal control for the agency’s schemes but particularly for the ERF.
• This means the integrity of audits must be maintained.
Integrity of audits
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
3
"Not only must Justice be done;it must also be
seen to be done."
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Today I will talk about
4
• How the agency manages auditor performance.
• The pilot desktop inspection programme.
• The Auditor Performance Advisory Committee.
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Managing auditor performance
6NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
7
Standard processes: gathering data
• education and client engagement
• annual reporting
• NGER Audit Programme
• registration reviews
• analysing audit reports
• surveillance and outreach visits
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
In progress
8
• desktop inspections: pilot programme conducted recently
• audit analysis and risk profiling
• working with certification bodies, e.g. ASIC
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Under development
9
On-site inspections• at auditor’s premises• inspections by agency staff and others appointed by agency• both random and targeted inspections
Other• increased scrutiny of fit and proper status• checks to ensure CPD requirements met – annual selection of
auditors
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Desktop inspections
What is the pilot desktop inspection programme?
11
• started in August last year
• auditors from different firms provided documentation
• testing agency’s systems and processes
• gain insight into future role of desktop and physical inspections
• auditors to get more detailed feedback shortly
• desktop inspections will compliment other assessment activities, e.g. reviews – they will not replace them
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Overall results
Series10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Met expectations
Improvements recommended
Did not meet expectations
13 auditors assessed
12NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Findings
Terms of engagement
• comprehensive
• appears that sufficient time allocated for audits
Management representation letters
• legislative requirements usually met
What was done well Room for improvementIndependence and conduct declarations
• signed after terms of engagement
• legislation not strictly complied with
• better use of audit standards
Peer review documentation
• lack of evidence
13NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Terms of engagement
14
The agency expects:
• Auditors should use Audit Determination Handbook template.
• Auditors must meet requirements in section 3.3 of Audit Determination.
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Management representation letter
15
The agency expects:
• Auditors should use Audit Determination Handbook template – not mandatory.
• Letter should be signed on same day as audit report. (No audit work to be undertaken once this is signed).
• Auditors should meet requirements in paragraph 58 of GS021.
• Auditors should meet requirements in paragraph 56 of ASAE 3000.
• Auditors must meet requirements in section 3.14(2) of Audit Determination.
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Independence and conduct declarations
16
The agency expects:
• Declaration for team leader should be signed same day as terms of engagement – if not before.
• Declaration for peer reviewer should be signed within five days of terms of engagement.
• Declaration for team member should be signed by the time start working on assurance engagement.
• Auditors should meet requirements of section 290 of APES 110.
• Auditors must meet requirements in section 2.4 of Audit Determination.
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Peer review – taking a close look
17
The agency expects:
• External peer reviewers should be engaged in writing.
• Peer reviewers should be engaged no more than 5 days after terms of engagement signed.
• Auditors must meet requirements in section 3.7(2) of Audit Determination.
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Where to now?
18
Desktop inspections will become part of business as usual.
Auditors can expect that:
• each year agency will select auditors to undergo desktop inspections
• auditors to submit a set of designated documentation for review, and
• on-site inspections to supplement desktop inspections.
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Auditor Performance Advisory Committee
What is this committee?
20
The committee will:
• supervise the conducting of on-site inspections of auditors• consist of four or five senior agency staff, and• have four advisers—both agency staff and external experts.
It will meet several times a year to:• select auditors for inspection• choose scope of inspections• appoint inspection teams, and• review findings and make recommendations to delegate.
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Advantages of a committee
21
• Inspections not reliant on one individual and their personal abilities and attitudes.
• Provides oversight to ensure the integrity of inspection process.
• Facilitates robust and rigorous decision-making process.
• Allows agency to make use of outside expertise e.g. former registered greenhouse and energy auditors.
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
Inspections
22
Expected to be three or more inspections a year. These will:
> be performed on both selected auditors and on a random basis> take place at an auditor’s premises > require auditor to provide access to inspectors—including to records
and other documentation> look into the conduct of several audits by same auditor, and> likely to be performed by one expert and one agency staffer who is
an Authorised Officer.
The first inspection should take place in April or May.
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
23
Looking at the big picture
• Audits are principal control for ERF and other schemes.
• Audits only have value if they have integrity.
• This integrity is crucial for both agency and auditors.
NGER Audit Program 2014-15 31 March 2015
