ava's uk fmd scheme gives worthwhile results for australia

1
Aust Vet J Vol 79, No 8, August 2001 518 News T o date the AVA has sent three teams, totalling 37 veterinarians, to the UK on our FMD project. Funding was provided from a range of sources, including the AVA, Traveland, the Australian Agricultural Company, Bayer, some State Governments, the Federal Government, through AFFA, and the UK Government, through its recently renamed Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Once in the UK, all of the participants in our scheme were employed by DEFRA as Temporary Veterinary Inspectors (TVIs). We received 105 applications from members seeking to be included in the scheme. Many applicants decided to pay their own fares to enable them to meet their individual timetables and their other commitments. Some other Australian veterinarians who were already in the UK at the time of the outbreak were also employed as TVIs. The actual number of Australian practitioners involved in assisting to combat the FMD outbreak is impossible to calculate but it is known to be a very significant number. The practitioners complemented the 76 veterinarians and 28 stock inspectors/ rangers and a group of disease control staff sent by State, Commonwealth and Local Governments under the International Veterinary Reserve. DEFRA increased its veterinary staff from 220 to between 1600 and 1800 to manage the FMD outbreak. TVIs from many countries were employed and practitioners played a major role throughout. Feedback on the performance of the Australian practitioners has been very positive. They played lead roles in diagnostic teams, in slaughter and disposal, in appeals and in control centres. Perhaps the main benefit of the AVA scheme has been the breadth of experience gained by practitioners. This is to be integrated into our control and eradication program. As governments downsize and the roles of practitioners expand this operational experience is as valuable as the direct exposure of our participants to the nature of the clinical disease. It seems the Australians were adept in the handling of the disease program in sheep. It is clear that an experienced practitioner presence in the bush will be critical to the early recognition, diagnosis and response should FMD or another serious disease enter the continent. UK DEFRA (formerly MAFF) had been employing the small numbers of Australians who had either been there – or who were prepared to go – in the early stages of the outbreak. The AVA scheme changed what had been a trickle of Australian practitioners into a flood, as more became aware of the important role they could play in the UK and in helping to bolster Australia’s exotic disease preparedness when they returned. DEFRA delegated to AVA, AFFA (Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry – Australia and the UK High Commission in Canberra, the authority to select veterinarians for the AVA scheme, ensuring for the first time they would have a TVI position awaiting their arrival in London. The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons facilitated registration for practice and the UK High Commission and DEFRA arranged the necessary work permits. Organisation of the project within the AVA was a significant effort involving input from the Board and numerous staff. A small committee undertook the selection process. At the time of writing, July 31, there were 1906 FMD infected premises in the UK and 3.635 million animals had been slaughtered or identified for slaughter. The outbreak has cost many billions of pounds and many farmers will never return to the land. Tourism has been seriously affected, especially by a countryside filled with burning pyres and devoid of animals. The outbreak delayed a general election. DEFRA has asked us to put AVA team four on hold, in the hope their services will not be required. The AVA has taken steps to capture the experiences of the veterinarians involved, through reports, presentations, workshops and seminars. The material will be utilised in AVA planning, liaison with governments and through practical inputs into emergency animal disease planning. There are still concerns regarding the intensive piggeries in Yorkshire and in bringing down animals from summer pastures in the mountains, something that could potentially reintroduce FMD onto farms. AVA UK FMD Team 2 Oops! It has come to AVA’s notice that one of the participants in our second team of practitioners sent to fight the UK FMD outbreak was inadvertently omitted from our published list of those involved. He is Dr Michael Smith, of Milawa, Victoria. The published list for team two also included the name of one proposed participant who, through a change of circumstances, was unable to go. He is Dr Ed Butterworth, of Mt Isa, Qld. The AVA apologises to both for any confusion created by our distribution of the incorrect information. The following item is an overview of the highly successful AVA program to send veterinary practitioners to the UK to gain direct experience in handling a serious outbreak of FMD so that knowledge could be brought home to bolster Australia’s preparedness to protect our livestock industries from exotic disease. It was written by the AVA National Veterinarian, Dr Kevin Doyle, who was responsible for co-ordinating the scheme. No Exotic Bulletin T he regular quarterly two-page feature article, the Exotic Animal Diseases Bulletin, does not appear in this issue of the AVJ because AFFA (Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries – Australia) was unable to supply the material for the second month in succession. It will reappear when the relevant material is made available to the Managing Editor. AVA’s UK FMD scheme gives worthwhile results for Australia Kevin Doyle

Upload: kevin-doyle

Post on 21-Jul-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Aust Vet J Vol 79, No 8, August 2001518

News

To date the AVA has sent threeteams, totalling 37 veterinarians,to the UK on our FMD project.

Funding was provided from a range ofsources, including the AVA, Traveland, theAustralian Agricultural Company, Bayer,some State Governments, the FederalGovernment, through AFFA, and the UKGovernment, through its recently renamedDepartment of Environment, Food andRural Affairs.Once in the UK, all of the participants inour scheme were employed by DEFRA asTemporary Veterinary Inspectors (TVIs).We received 105 applications frommembers seeking to be included in thescheme. Many applicants decided to paytheir own fares to enable them to meettheir individual timetables and their othercommitments. Some other Australianveterinarians who were already in the UKat the time of the outbreak were alsoemployed as TVIs. The actual number ofAustralian practitioners involved inassisting to combat the FMD outbreak isimpossible to calculate but it is known tobe a very significant number.The practitioners complemented the 76veterinarians and 28 stock inspectors/rangers and a group of disease control staffsent by State, Commonwealth and LocalGovernments under the InternationalVeterinary Reserve.DEFRA increased its veterinary staff from220 to between 1600 and 1800 to manage

the FMD outbreak. TVIs from manycountries were employed and practitionersplayed a major role throughout.Feedback on the performance of theAustralian practitioners has been verypositive. They played lead roles indiagnostic teams, in slaughter and disposal,in appeals and in control centres.Perhaps the main benefit of the AVAscheme has been the breadth of experiencegained by practitioners. This is to beintegrated into our control and eradicationprogram. As governments downsize andthe roles of practitioners expand thisoperational experience is as valuable as thedirect exposure of our participants to thenature of the clinical disease.It seems the Australians were adept in thehandling of the disease program in sheep.It is clear that an experienced practitionerpresence in the bush will be critical to theearly recognition, diagnosis and responseshould FMD or another serious diseaseenter the continent.UK DEFRA (formerly MAFF) had beenemploying the small numbers ofAustralians who had either been there – orwho were prepared to go – in the earlystages of the outbreak. The AVA schemechanged what had been a trickle ofAustralian practitioners into a flood, asmore became aware of the important rolethey could play in the UK and in helpingto bolster Australia’s exotic diseasepreparedness when they returned.DEFRA delegated to AVA, AFFA(Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry –Australia and the UK High Commission inCanberra, the authority to selectveterinarians for the AVA scheme, ensuringfor the first time they would have a TVIposition awaiting their arrival in London.The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeonsfacilitated registration for practice and theUK High Commission and DEFRAarranged the necessary work permits.Organisation of the project within the AVA

was a significant effort involving inputfrom the Board and numerous staff. Asmall committee undertook the selectionprocess.At the time of writing, July 31, there were1906 FMD infected premises in the UKand 3.635 million animals had beenslaughtered or identified for slaughter. Theoutbreak has cost many billions of poundsand many farmers will never return to theland. Tourism has been seriously affected,especially by a countryside filled withburning pyres and devoid of animals. Theoutbreak delayed a general election.DEFRA has asked us to put AVA team fouron hold, in the hope their services will notbe required.The AVA has taken steps to capture theexperiences of the veterinarians involved,through reports, presentations, workshopsand seminars. The material will be utilisedin AVA planning, liaison with governmentsand through practical inputs intoemergency animal disease planning.There are still concerns regarding theintensive piggeries in Yorkshire and inbringing down animals from summerpastures in the mountains, something thatcould potentially reintroduce FMD ontofarms.

AVA UK FMD Team 2 Oops!It has come to AVA’s notice that one of theparticipants in our second team ofpractitioners sent to fight the UK FMDoutbreak was inadvertently omitted fromour published list of those involved.He is Dr Michael Smith, of Milawa,Victoria.The published list for team two alsoincluded the name of one proposedparticipant who, through a change ofcircumstances, was unable to go. He is DrEd Butterworth, of Mt Isa, Qld.The AVA apologises to both for anyconfusion created by our distribution ofthe incorrect information.

The following item is an overview of the highly successful AVA program to sendveterinary practitioners to the UK to gain direct experience in handling a seriousoutbreak of FMD so that knowledge could be brought home to bolster Australia’s

preparedness to protect our livestock industries from exotic disease.It was written by the AVA National Veterinarian, Dr Kevin Doyle, who was

responsible for co-ordinating the scheme.

No Exotic Bulletin

The regular quarterly two-pagefeature article, the ExoticAnimal Diseases Bulletin, does

not appear in this issue of the AVJbecause AFFA (Agriculture, Forestryand Fisheries – Australia) was unable tosupply the material for the secondmonth in succession. It will reappearwhen the relevant material is madeavailable to the Managing Editor.

AVA’s UK FMD scheme givesworthwhile results for Australia

Kevin Doyle