Barrier Removal Day

April 5, 2011

Flow of the day• 8:30-9:30-Big Picture-BR – MPA Governance and Enforcement• Presentation 1: List of essentials for a functional MPA vis a vis MPA

effectiveness rating• 9:30-11:00-Presentation 2: Steps in forming/strengthening ManCom and

preparations for the OD/MPA effectiveness rating & plan workshops + dates

• 11:00-11:10-Break• 11:10-12:00-Presentation 3: BROP creation and Fisheries Profile• 12:00-1:00-Lunch• 1:00-2:00-Jong Time: with PPM CF• 2:00-2:45-BROP/PCRA selection for validation• 2:45-3:15-Monitoring plan• 3:15-3:30-Break• 3:30-4:30-Community validation exercise• 4:30-5:30-Introduction to project plan

Big Picture

[8:30-9:30]

Objectives:

• At the end of the session, we will have covered the following:– Objectives and the process of barrier removal;– Map out the phases in the PEP 2 methodology– Discuss the various components of MPA

Governance (BR)

Presentation

1. The overarching objectives of MPA Governance (BR framework)

2. The phases of MPA Governance (PEP 2 methodology)

1. MPA Governance Framework (BR): Objectives

Based on the cohort hypothesis:

• Improve MPA governance• Improve MPA enforcement

• Each MPA should reach Level 3 “enforced” by July 2012

• Governance = the processes by which leaders are selected and how organizational policies are formulated and reviewed• Enforcement is an important part of

Governance and essential to MPA success so we highlighted it

Why MPA governance and enforcement

• Identified as the 2 key BR strategies during initial evaluation of TOC documents in March 2010 (Cebu workshop).

TWG

• Integral part of the BR and Social Marketing infrastructure

• Assist with implementation of MPA governance (BR) and Social Marketing campaign

PEP Methodologythe four Phases of MPA Governance (BR)

1. PCRA (December 2010-May 2011)2. Planning – Development of MPA Governance

plan (BROP) [May 2011] (bring to Module 3)3. Implementation of MPA-Governance and

Management Plan (BROP) (July 2011 onwards)4. Evaluation (August 2011 onwards)

1. PCRA [December 2010-May 2011]

Objectives of the PCRA:• To re-engage the community in the MPA

governance and management• To understand the rationale of the community

for the MPAs• To identify local community champions and

potential members of ManCom

1. PCRA: Setting up ManCom

• The community level organization tasked with the day to day operations of the MPA

• Organization tasked to be in charge of Planning, implementation and evaluation of MPA activities

1. PCRA: MERF

• Baseline on Corals, fish, invertebrates, biomass of fish

MERF Proposed dates

Cluster Campaign sites Dates Confirmed/noSurigao Cortes-Uba MPA March 27- 30 CONFIRMEDSurigao Lanuza April 1-4 CONFIRMEDSurigao Cantilan-Ayoke Island

MPAApril 5-8 CONFIRMED

Davao (fisheries interview only; ecological survey done last year)

Samal April 9-12 MERF choose this dates

Bohol Tagbilaran May 10-13  CONFIRMEDBohol Inabanga May 5-9  CONFIRMEDCebu-Neg Amlan-Tandayag MPA May 2-4  CONFIRMEDCebu-Neg Boljoon-Grananda MPA April 27-30   CONFIRMEDBicol Tinambac-Agay-ayan MPA May 27-31  CONFIRMEDBicol Bacacay May 23-26  CONFIRMEDSouthern Leyte Hinunangan May 19-22  CONFIRMEDSouthern Leyte San Francisco May 14-18  NO

1. PCRA: Community reef monitoring

• Community conduct underwater assessment of resources in the community

• Community begin seeing and being involved in monitoring

1. PCRA: MPA effectiveness rating

• ManCom work towards evaluation of the MPA• ManCom plans on interventions to improve

rating level

1. PCRA: Community Day

• Resource mapping• FGD’s on enforcement• FGD on MPA history and folklore

PCRA and Reef Monitoring Updates

Campaign sites PCRA FGDs Community reef surveyCortes (Uba and Burgos MPAs) OK OKLanuza (Lanuza Marine Park) No scedule NOCantilan (Ayoke and General Islands) April 11-15, April 27-29, May 16-

19NO

Samal (Sanipaan MPA) No schedule (need to do MPA History MPA)

OK

Tagbilaran (Mabaw MPA) April 11-15  April 14-16Inabanga (Hambongan MPA) April 14-15 OKAmlan March 21-24 OKBoljoon No schedule NOTinambac April 11-15 NOBacacay April 11-15 NOHinunangan OK NOSan Francisco March 21-23 NO

Map UpdatesActivities Sam

alCortes (Uba and Burgos MPAs)

Lanuza

Cantilan (General Island and Ayoke Island)

Amlan (Tandayag and Bio-os)

Boljoon (Arbor and Granada)

Tagbilaran

Inabanga

Hinunangan

San Francisco

Tinambac (Caloco and Agay-ayan)

Bacacay

MPA coordinates Ok Not Not Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Not Ok Not NotBase Map reefs, bathymetry, roads, political boundaries (Municipal and Barangay)

In progress

In progre

ss

In progress

In progress

In progre

ss

In progres

s

In progres

s

In progres

sOk Ok Ok Ok

Resource maps (for digitization) Not Ok Not Not Ok Not Not Ok Ok Not Not Not

Digitizing and lay outing the base maps (roads maps, major ecosystems and additional elements)

2. Planning (BROP) [May 2011] and implementation

• Consolidates the results of the PCRA and provides analysis and action points, identifying the who, when, what and where

• Acts as road map for MPA governance activities as BR in your TOC as part of the campaign

• Outline discussed later

3. Implementation

• Implement MPA Governance plan as part of the MPA, in coordination with TWG and ManCom

4. Evaluation

• Evaluation of MPA rating (April –May, 2011 – Ronet)

• Evaluation MPA Governance plan (July 2012)• Evaluation of MPA Rating (2012)

2. Barrier removal components

• TWG and ManCom OD workshops• PCRA• MERF• Community reef survey• MPA effectiveness rating • MPA Governance and Management Planning

Summary

• Discussed the four phases of MPA Governance (BR)

• Discussed the tools at each of the stages

Presentation 1: Best Practices for a functional MPA & relation to MPA effectiveness rating

[9:00-9:30]

Objectives:

• This session will present– The best practices for MPA Governance for the

cohort– Some details of each best practice– Present a draft road map for best practices

What is a Best Practice in MPA Governance

• A key “activity” that needs to be in place for your MPAs to reach Level 3 (enforced) rating

• It is taken from the MPA rating system (key activities only)

1. MPA Governance Best Practices

• Management Body formed and active• Guardhouse functioning• Community Monitoring Team formed and trained• Management Plan in place (BROP) with resources

allocated• Ordinance declared• Evaluation system in place and conducted

annually (MPA rating system)

Management body

• Policy making, planning, fund sourcing and day to day implementation with budget

• Individuals from the TWG and ManCom• Supported by MPA ordinance• Clear roles and elected officials (chair, vice, committees

etc)• Mix of community and village sectors involved (not just

fishers) and needs barangay officials ideally• Monthly meetings and funds available• Target: May 2011

Guardhouse• Established and maintained• Operations center for MPA governance and one stop shop

for community members to visit• Safe place to house enforcers• Act as deterrent • All corners of the MPA boundaries visible• Place where logbook and other logistics is lodged• Can be an education center [i.e. Lanuza Marine Park]• Level 2-17• Target: November 2011

Management Plan

• Guide/blueprint for the management body• Needs evaluation based on current data

(performance and biophysical status)• Contains what, when, who, how much• Supported by Ordinance• Resources allocated annually at village / town and

partners (NGO / DENR etc)• Level 1-No. 4; Level 2-No. 12• Target: June 2010

Monitoring systems in place

• MPA effectiveness and community biophysical monitoring team in place

• Individuals trained to do community reef survey• Individuals are assigned to tasks/roles in data

collection• Processes and feeds back outputs to community

and postings in conspicuous places• Level 2-No. 18• November 2011

Ordinance

• Legal basis• Include sections as NTZ boundaries,

regulation, date of establishment• Important sections: authority of management

group, functions, list of composition• Level 1 (drafted)-No. 6; Level 2 (passed and

approved)-No. 9

Marker buoys/posts

• Clear boundary markers for all to see• Comes in many forms depending on site

suitability• Need a map and delineation [coordinates]• Level 2-No. 15; Level 3-No. 22• Target: November 2011

Billboards and signages

• Established in conspicuous places• Maintained and updated• Contain important regulation and MPA technical

description: structures and maps or recent results of community survey

• Act as simple education material, focus on rules and policies

• Level 1- No. 7; Level 2-No. 16• Target: November 2011

2. MPA Enforcement – Best Practices

• Enforcement system operational• Logbook system• Patrol boat / equipment• Human resources trained and operational

Enforcement system operational• Enforcement team - deputized• Clear coordination with PNP and MAO/MENRO/AT• 24/7 guarding, • Intelligence system established• Resources available for not only enforcement, but for

judicial support / prosection• Honoraria• Resources for incentives / insurance etc• Level 2-No. 13.• Target: November 2011

Logbook system

• Contains what, actions taken, who, when, where and etc.

• Lodged in the guardhouse• Updated by MPA guards• Coincide with police blotters • Serves as monitoring tool (TR in our TOC)• Level 1-No. 5; Level 2-No. 13• Target: November 2011

Enforcement Equipment

• Boat• Communications equipment• Flashlights / uniforms• Gasoline etc• Equipped with logistics and equipments (patrol

boat, gasoline, uniform, GPS, flashlights)

• Level 2-No. 13• Target: November 2011

Enforcement team

• Group of individuals who will run enforcement plan (DFW, PNP, tanod and etc.) with support for big time operators

• Conducts regular patrolling and 24/7• Operations plan and Communication plan drafted

and agreed• Anchored in the Management Body• Level 1-No. 5; Level 2-No. 13• Target: November 2011

Presentation 2: Steps in forming/strengthening ManCom and preparations for the OD/MPA effectiveness rating & plan

workshops + dates

10:00 -10:50

Session objectives1. To arrive at a shared understanding of how the man com reconstitution fits in

the Barrier removal component of the campaign in each site2. To arrive at a shared understanding of the specific outcomes for the barrier

removal component of the campaign after 18 months 3. To agree on the process or the principles of the process for selecting who

should compose the mancom and how to legitimize these with the end in view of institutionalizing these

4. To agree on the use of the Ecogov/CCEF MPA management effectiveness tool in Excel especially its interpretation templates and how these can be used in determining OD baselines and in improving organizational performance of the MPA management body

5. To agree on dates of the workshops in each site6. To agree on responsibilities for preparation – invites, materials, venue, food, etc.7. To establish communication lines

Session flowSession description TimePart 1: The Big Picture 10:00 to 10:05Part 2: Steps in Reconstituting the ManComs

10:05 to 10:15

Part 3: Assessing MPA Management Effectiveness

10:15 to 10:40

Part 4: Workplan administration 10:40 to 10:50

Part 1: 1000-1005The Big Picture Session Objective: 1. To arrive at a shared understanding of how the man com

reconstitution fits in the Barrier removal component of the campaign in each site

2. To arrive at a shared understanding of the specific outcomes for the barrier removal component of the campaign after 18 months

Process:Presentation of how the man com workshop fits in the overall RARE barrier removal strategy (5 mins)

RARE Barrier removal objectives

Improve GovernanceImprove EnforcementAchieve Level 3 status (“enforced”) in

management effectiveness after the campaign

Theory of Change

KKnowledge

AAttitude

ICInterpersonalCommunication

BRBarrierRemoval

BCBehaviorChange

TRThreatReduction

CRConservationResult

Lack of enforcementLow level of awarenessWeak MPA governanceLack of alternative livelihoods

Identified barriers based on MPA survey

PoliticalSocial EconomicTechnological

Factors that prevent people from adopting desired behavior

Members of the wider communitySupport the MPAParticipate in its management

Management bodyImproved governanceImproved enforcementEncourage participationAttain at least level 3 status in management effectivenessTWGs have been formed

ManCom strengthening is next step

Organizational development trajectory of MPA management bodies

Level 1: Initiated Management body

membership tentatively determined

Starting to conduct regular meetings with proper documentation

[non-threshold indicator]

Level 2: Established Management body

formed and functional

Composition of management group and committees identified

Roles and responsibilities clarified and accepted

Initial meetings conducted

[Threshold indicator]

Level 3: Enforced Management body

active and supported by legal instrument

Prepares annual operational plan

Implements management plan including enforcement and monitoring

Manages resolution of conflicts

[Non-threshold indicator]

Level 4: Sustained Management body

capable to run MPA independently

Supervises/facilitates management activities (enforcement, budgeting and financial management, M an d E, IEC, etc.

[Non-threshold indicator]

Level 5: InstitutionalizedManagement body has capacity for fund sourcing from local and external sourcesPerformance M and E linked to incentive system

[Threshold and non-threshold indicator]

This level is what we aim to achieve within the timeframe of the project

Most MPAs are probably at this level at present

Part 2: 1005 - 1015Steps in Reconstituting the ManComs Session Objective: 1. To agree on the process or the principles of the process for

selecting who should compose the mancom and how to strengthen these with the end in view of institutionalizing these

Process:Presentation (10 mins)Discussion (5 mins)

MPA management body basic structure

Policy-making unitTechnical Working Group

Basic functionsPolicy makingFormulation of plansResource generationNetworking

Multi-sectoral, meets Quarterly

Implementing unitManagement Committee

Basic functionsEnforcementBiophysical monitoringSurveillancePublic education

Based on organic structures in LGU but encourages participation of de facto groups

MPA Management Body

Structure should be in line with overall governance structure in the municipality

Steps in ManCom strengthening based on status of MPA management body - overall framework

With MPA ordinanceAll except Hinunangan

Without MPA ordinanceHinunanganBut w/ active enforcement committee

With management planAmlanSan FranciscoTinambacBacacay (1 only)CantilanCortesInabangaICaGoS

No managementPlanBoljoonTagbilaranLanuza

Steps in strengthening ManCom

Review MPA ordinance in terms of MC composition and functions

Composition and functions are clear

Composition and functions are NOT clear

Proceed with assessing management effectiveness using Ecogov/CCEF tool

Use ‘mancom template’ to clarify functions and who should compose MC

Identify adhoc leader and assess management effec-tiveness with persons identified in previous step

Formulate OD plan and update MPA management plan

Use ‘mancom template’ to clarify functions and who should compose MC/

Once composition and functions are clarified, proceed with assessing management effectiveness

Suggested criteria in selecting ManCom members and leaders

Individuals who had been part of the MPA establishment process

Individuals who are interested to work with you for the MPA

Individuals who have influence in the village (municipality) Individuals who have the appropriate knowledge and skills

or willing to learn Individuals who have the time for MPA management Individuals in the LGU whose job descriptions include

aspects of MPA management

Suggested process for strengthening ManComs – if with MPA ordinance and MC composition and functions are clear

Steps/tools Outputs

1. Review MC-related provisions of ordinance MC functions and composition clarified

2. Score the management effectiveness of the management body

Management level identifiedManagement focuses identified

3. Formulate OD plan for ManCom OD plan for MC formulated

4. Update Management Plan for 2011 Updated MPA management plan

Suggested process for strengthening ManComs – if with MPA ordinance and MC composition and functions are NOT clear

Steps/tools Outputs

1. Review MC-related provisions of ordinance MC functions and composition clarified

2. Use ‘mancom template’ to clarify functions and composition of MCs

MC composition and functions clarified

3. Identify adhoc MC head and invite persons identified in 2 to do 4.

Adhoc MC letter identifiedAdhoc MC members identified

4. Score the management effectiveness of the management body

Management level identifiedManagement focuses identified

5. Formulate OD plan for ManCom OD plan for MC formulated

6. Update Management Plan for 2011 Updated MPA management plan

Suggested process for strengthening ManComs – if with NO MPA ordinance and MC composition and functions are NOT clear

Steps/tools Outputs

1. Use ‘mancom template’ to clarify functions and composition of MCs

MC composition and functions clarified

2. Identify adhoc MC head and invite persons identified in 2 to do 4.

Adhoc MC letter identifiedAdhoc MC members identified

3. Score the management effectiveness of the management body

Management level identifiedManagement focuses identied

4. Formulate OD plan for ManCom OD plan for MC formulated

5. Update Management Plan for 2011 Updated MPA management plan

Part 3: 1015 - 1040Assessing MPA Management Effectiveness Session Objective: 1. To agree on the use of the Ecogov/CCEF MPA management

effectiveness tool in Excel especially its interpretation templates and how these can be used in determining OD baselines and in improving organizational performance of the MPA management body

Process:Presentation (5 mins)Discussion (15 mins)

MPA effectiveness

• How does this relate to ManCom or the Management Body in general?

• What is the objective of MPA effectiveness; please relate to our target: improve governance and enforcement and achieve Level 3 by 2012

3. Ecogov/CCEF management Effectiveness Rating Tool – overall framework

ThresholdsMPA concept explained and acceptedSite selected with community acceptance

ThresholdsOrdinance passed and approved by the Municipal CouncilManagement plan legitimized by the LGU.Management body formed and functionalBudget for year 1 allocatedEnforcement activities initiated

ThresholdsCollaborative patrolling and surveillance in place Education program sustained public awareness and complianceFishing effectively stopped inside sanctuary zoneIllegal and destructive fishing reduced outside MPA

ThresholdsEnforcement system is fully operationalPerformance of management body regularly monitored and evaluated with stakeholder participationIllegal and destructive fishing activities stopped inside and within MPA

ThresholdsMPA manage-ment plan and budgetary requirements incorporated in the LGU devt plan sPerformance M and E linked to incentive systemIEC program on MPA sustainedMPA empha-sizes public education, residents advocate for MPA

Level 1 Initiated

Level 2 Established

Level 3 Enforced

Level 4 Sustained

Level 5 Institutionalized

Min 8 pts.

6 months

Min 24 pts.

Year 1Min 38 pts.

Year 3 Min 50 pts.

Year 5 Min 66 pts.

Year 7

INPUT/OUTPUT

RESULTS/IMPACT

Scores:Non threshold indicators = 1 pointThreshold indicators = 3 points49 indicators; 18 threshold indicatorsA total of 87 points for all indicators

Ecogov/CCEF management Effectiveness Rating Tool

Interpretation templates:Management levelsManagement focus (this is the OD aspect of

the tool)

Ecogov/CCEF management Effectiveness Rating Tool

Part 4: 1040 - 1050Workplan administrationSession Objective: 1. To agree on dates of the workshops in each site2. To agree on responsibilities for preparation – invites,

materials, venue, food, etc.3. To establish communication lines

Process:Discussion (10 mins)

Roles and taskingPPMs CFs Jong Ronet

Pre workshop Coordinate with CFs on schedule, Mancom attendees, venue, budget, materials

Coordinate with CFs on schedule, Mancom attendees, venue, budget, materials

Coordinate with CFs on flow of activity

Coordinate with CFs on flow of activity

Workshop Co-facilitator Co-facilitator CO-facilitator Overall facilitator

Post workshop Mentoring Mentoring Updating Evaluation

ManCom Proposed DatesCluster Campaign sites Dates Confirmed/noSurigao Cortes May 9-10 NOSurigao Lanuza May 12-13 NOSurigao Cantilan May 16-17 NODavao Samal May 19-20 NOBohol Tagbilaran April 14-15  CONFIRME

DBohol Inabanga April 12-13  CONFIRME

DCebu-Neg Amlan May-5-6 NOCebu-Neg Boljoon May 3-4 NOBicol Tinambac May 23-24 NOBicol Bacacay May 26-27 NOSouthern Leyte Hinunangan April 25-26 NOSouthern Leyte San Francisco April 28-29 NO

MPA GOVERNANCE AND MANGEMENT PLAN (BROP)

[11:15-12:00]

Objectives:

• At the end of the session the CFs will be able to:– Explain how the MPA Governance and

Management Plan (MPA-GMP) fits into the PEP Methodology and Campaign plan

– Confirm updates on PCRA and MAPs

Process

• Presentation– Objectives of the MPA Governance and

Management Plan (BROP) – What is the MPA-GMP?– MPA-GMP Template– Run through of the major contents

Objectives of MPA-GMP

• To be the steering document for all MPAs to achieve governance and enforcement [Level 3 ‘enforced’]

• To consolidate the results of all the PCRA into a working plan and provide a guideline for implementers

• To clarify who, what, how and when for MPA governance

What is MPA-GMP (BROP)?

• A guide for the implementers (TWG / ManCom) that analyzes results of PCRA and offers a road map for improving MPA governance

• A document containing what, when who, budget

• Should be reviewed and updated annually

The MPA-GMP Template

..\My Documents\Jong\Jong\2nd Cohort Meeting\MPA Governance Plan-BROP.docx

Contents of the MPA-GMP

• Abstract

– A short narrative synthesizing the whole document (2-3 paragraphs)

– Why the MPA-GMP (2-3 sentences)– Explains why, who when how

Contents of the MPA-GMP

• Introduction– Objectives and scope– Results of PCRA [MPA effectiveness rating

workshop, TWG and ManCom OD and planning workshop, PCRA tools]

– MPA profile [PCRA results, MPA rating, threats and management challenges in the MPA]

– TWG and ManCom [short description on forming, composition, VMG]

Contents of the MPA-GMP

• Action Plan– Plan– Timeline to end of campaign life– You may include other strategies and activities

from existing MPA plans

Annex One: Fisheries Profile

• Objectives:

– Provide results of PCRA as a basis / justification for management planning

Why Fisheries Profile?

• Rationale for the MPA establishment• Act as documented baseline for the

community for their fisheries

Fisheries Profile

• Contains at a minimum the following:

• Resource maps• FGD on MPA history and folklore• FGD discussion on Law Enforcement

• Also contains other data collected during PCRA

FGD on Enforcement

• Describes forms and types of infringement in MPA

• Describes when infractions occur and where• Describes who (from where are the violators)• Describes what incentives and disincentives

have been practiced• Relates directly to Governance

FGD on MPA History and Folklore

• Describes time series of establishment process the group of people involved

• Accounts management timeline• Describes activities and folklores involved

relating to management responses• Relates directly to enforcement-how?• Use prework-2 and 3 [Management history

and timeline; comparison THEN and NOW]

FGD on Resource Map

• Provides quick reference to spatial relationships• Refresh knowledge on elements i.e. MPA

boundaries• Provides outright buy-in/appreciation as to

issues and threats to MPAs• Critical to planning• Relates directly to governance and enforcement

Fisheries Profile Template

..\My Documents\Jong\Jong\2nd Cohort Meeting\Revised Fisheries Profile.docx

Summary

• Critical FGDs that goes to MPA-GMP

– FGD on enforcement– FGD on resource mapping– FGD on MPA history and folklore– The rest can go to MPA-GMP Annex.

One to Many Sessions (1:00)

• PCRA-30 min [1:00-1:30]– Cherry– Where are the rest?

• Infrastructure-30 mins [1:30-2:00]– Annabel– Deza – Where are the rest?

• KAP-1:00

Workshop 1: MPA-GMP/PCRA/Monitoring data: Selection for public consultation

[2:00-2:45]

Objectives:

• At the end of the session, the CFs will be able to:– Identify critical components of MPA-GMP, PCRA

and monitoring plan for validation– Explain why such components are critical– Relate critical outputs to one another

Process

• Introduction [5 mins]• Groupings Workshop/discussions [10 mins]• Presentation [30 mins-10 minutes per group]

Objectives: Public Consultation

• To present results of diagnostics to the greater mass

• Gain comments/appreciation from community• Collect additional explanations to data• Gain community buy-in for current state of

fisheries, issues and actions for governance and enforcement

Documents for public consultation

• Marine Protected Area Governance and Management Plan

• PCRA

• Monitoring Plan

Mechanics

• Group into 3 [4 per group plus bring your loyal alternate with you]

• Discuss among the group critical components in the documents that you think should be included in the public consultation

• Agree top 5 critical components-discuss why and how to relate each document from one another

• Presentation [choose 1 presenter]

Summary

• Key documents for public consultation:

– MPA-GMP

– PCRA

– Monitoring plan

Workshop 2: Monitoring Plan

[2:45-3:15]

Objectives

• At the end of the session, the CFs will be able to:– Explain what is the monitoring plan,– Identify key steps in putting in place monitoring

tools– Build the monitoring plan– Flag MERF dates in respective locality

Process

• Introduction to the Monitoring Plan [5 mins]• Introduction to the workshop– Groupings 4 members per group [3 mins]– Discussion [7 mins]– Reporting [15 mins-5 mins each group]

Monitoring Plan BR_TR_CR: Objectives

• To observe one thing in one place over a period of time

• To look at changes overtime• To collect evidence of change• To deduction trends• To assess impact of intervention

Monitoring Plan

..\My Documents\Jong\Jong\2nd Cohort Meeting\Monitoring Plan_BR_TR_CR.xlsx

Mechanics

• Group in 3 [4 plus loyal alternate CFs]• Discuss what are the key steps to take to put

monitoring in place• Write all answers in the template• Reporting [select representative]

Key Thing!• This monitoring template

needs to be filled based on outputs in local scenario [BR_TR_BC_CR] In order to get invited for

module 3

Current Status of MPA Governance Activities

Sites TWG ManCom Monitoring team

Boljoon

Amlan

Tagbilaran

Inabanga

San Francisco

Hinunangan

Samal

Cortes

Lanuza

Cantilan

Bacacay

Tinambac