baryon resonance analysis from maid d. drechsel, s. kamalov, l. tiator

Download Baryon Resonance Analysis from MAID D. Drechsel, S. Kamalov, L. Tiator

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: derrick-horatio-watts

Post on 17-Jan-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

What is a resonance? What is a resonance? - a peak in the cross section ? - a peak in the imaginary part of a pw amplitude associated with a zero in the real part ? - a pole of the T-matrix in the 2nd Riemann sheet ! e.g. with a maximum in the speed-plots of pw amplitudes resonance part determines the pole background can be neglected

TRANSCRIPT

Baryon Resonance Analysis from MAID D. Drechsel, S. Kamalov, L. Tiator What is a resonance? What is a resonance? - a peak in the cross section ? - a peak in the imaginary part of a pw amplitude associated with a zero in the real part ? - a pole of the T-matrix in the 2nd Riemann sheet ! e.g. with a maximum in the speed-plots of pw amplitudes resonance part determines the pole background can be neglected possible requirements for an ansatz or a model of pion photoproduction gauge invariant covariant or at least relativistic crossing symmetric chirally symmetric fulfill low-energy theorems analytic unitary fulfill dispersion relations MAID Ansatz effective Lagrangian with fields on tree-level isobar model for N* and resonances (only with 4-stars) background partial waves are unitarized with K-matrix method for all S, P, D and F waves, higher background partial waves are taken from real Born terms P 33 (1232), P 11 (1440), S 11 (1535), S 11 (1650), S 31 (1620) are unitarized up to the region, above we fit a constant phase other resonances: D 13, D 33, D 15, P 13, P 31, F 15, F 35, F 37, we dont unitarize, but fit a constant phase as above MAID unitarization procedure K-matrix unitarization for all background partial waves up to L=3 MAID unitarization procedure a correction phase (W) for all Breit-Wigner resonance contributions the energy dependent width implicitly includes the coupling to other channels Definition of the electromagnetic NN* Couplings (e.g. Arndt et al, 1990 or PDG) reduced multipoles: therefore, we need a Partial Wave Analysis with resonance and background separation for helicity amplitudes and transition form factors we need the imaginary parts of the resonance multipoles Definition of the N-N* Form Factors helicity amplitudes: reduced multipoles from PWA: Sachs form factors: covariant (Dirac) form factors: for spin resonances as Roper P 11 or S 11 we get only 2 ff different sets of form factors can be defined as linear combinations of the reduced multipoles Delta: P 33 (1232) Roper: P 11 (1440) N*S 11 (1535) N*D 13 (1520) N*S 11 (1650) N*D 15 (1675) N*F 15 (1680) N*P 13 (1720) with MAID we have performed a detailed analysis of Transition Form Factors for the following Baryon Resonances data base for pion electroproduction data in the region up to W = 1.3 GeV data up to the 3rd resonance region up to W = 1.7 GeV JLab/Hall CFrolov1999 p0p0 Q = GeV BatesMertz et al.2001 p0p0 Q = GeV MainzPospischil et al.2001 p0p0 Q = GeV BonnBantes, Gothe2002 p0p0 Q = 0.6 GeV MainzElsner et al. / Stave et al.2006 p0p0 Q = GeV JLab/Hall AKelly et al.2007 n0n0 Q = 1.0 GeV JLab/CLASVillano et al.2008 prelim. p0p0 Q = 6.0 7.9 GeV JLab/CLASJoo et al.2002 / 2003 p0p0 Q = 0.4 1.8 GeV JLab/CLASJoo et al.2004 n+n+ Q = GeV JLab/Hall ALaveissiere et al.2004 n0n0 Q = 1.0 GeV JLab/CLASEgiyan et al.2006 n+n+ Q = 0.3 0.6 GeV JLab/CLASUngaro et al.2006 p0p0 Q = 3.0 6.0 GeV JLab/CLASPark et al.2008 n+n+ Q = 1.7 4.5 GeV E/M and S/M ratios for the N transition the analyses are based on 0 data from JLab, Mainz, Bonn and Bates analysis fit A fit B Ji, Ma, Yuan, PRL 90, 2003 pQCD with angular momentum effects Nucleon -> Delta on the Lattice C. Alexandrou et al., 2008 dynamical fermions m down to 360 MeV G M : main problems at small Q (pion cloud) R EM, R SM : in agreement within large uncertainties transition form factors of the Roper comparison of MAID and JLab analysis A 1/2 S 1/2 MAID analysis 2007/08 JLab analysis 2008 F2F2 F1F1 Huey-Wen Lin (JLab), ECT*, Trento 2008 Nucleon-Roper Transition Form Factors on the Lattice again problem with pion cloud at small Q Transverse Densities (Miller 2007 and Carlson, Vanderhaeghen 2007) for unpolarized nucleons or resonances: for polarized nucleons or resonances: the Breit frame, mostly used in nuclear physics, is not a propriate frame for the nucleon or nucleon resonances e.g. Z- graphs spoil the density interpretation these problems do not exist in the infinite momentum frame (on the Light Cone), where q + =0, and Z- graphs are suppressed in this frame transverse densities can be defined as 2-dim. Fourier transforms of the Dirac form factors Transverse Charge Densities of the Nucleon and N -> Roper (in collaboration with Marc Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Lett. B 672 (2009) 344) N S 11 (1535) MAID analysis 2007/2008 JLab analysis 2008 longitudinal: S 1/2 transverse: A 1/2 N D 13 (1520) A 3/2 A 1/2 longitudinal: S 1/2 MAID analysis 2007/2008 JLab analysis 2008 Transverse Charge Densities of the Nucleon and N -> Roper (in collaboration with Marc Vanderhaeghen, in preparation) N F 15 (1680) resonances with some forbidden amplitudes forbidden resonances with some forbidden amplitudes Summary and Conclusions MAID: set of single-channel partial wave analysis programs on the basis of isobar models recent results from channel (Maid2007/08): N->N* transition form factors for 13 N*/ resonances with **** PDG rating reasonably well for: I=3/2: P 33 (1232) I=1/2 proton: P 11 (1440), S 11 (1535), D 13 (1520), F 15 (1680) S 11 (1650), D 15 (1675), P 13 (1720),