beyond the portfolio

12
Beyond the Portfolio Assessing Workplace Learning in Undergraduate History Programmes Richard Hawkins and Harvey Woolf

Upload: sigourney-emerson

Post on 31-Dec-2015

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Beyond the Portfolio. Assessing Workplace Learning in Undergraduate History Programmes. Structure. Why wpl and why assessment Project context 7 emerging findings 3 emerging issues An assignment question. Why workplace learning and why assessment?. The employability agenda - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Beyond the PortfolioAssessing Workplace Learning in Undergraduate

History Programmes

Richard Hawkins and Harvey Woolf

StructureWhy wpl and why assessment

Project context

7 emerging findings

3 emerging issues

An assignment question

April, 2011Richard Hawkins and Harvey Woolf 2

Why workplace learning and why assessment?

The employability agenda

Curriculum diversity

Centrality of assessment – ‘No student can escape bad assessment’ (David Boud)

April, 2011Richard Hawkins and Harvey Woolf 3

The WPL project

April, 2011Richard Hawkins and Harvey Woolf 4

Some preliminary findings (1)

Relationship of placement modules to History?

What is being assessed?Reflection on the placement experience

How are wpl modules being assessed? Mostly through logs, reflective essays & reports-

To what extent are employers involved in assessment?

Very little

April, 2011Richard Hawkins and Harvey Woolf 5

Some preliminary findings (2)

How ensure students receive feedback?Provide electronically

How well do students perform?As well as, or better than, other modules

What value do placement modules add?NetworkingCareer choiceOwnership of learningShows History at work

April, 2011Richard Hawkins and Harvey Woolf 6

Issues 1: Should a placement be compulsory?

Yes

Ensures all students have opportunity:

to experience work-related activities

to meet employability learning outcomes

No

Not suitable/relevant for all students

Requires a volunteer’s commitment and motivation

Logistical considerations

April, 2011Richard Hawkins and Harvey Woolf 7

Issues 2: Should the product of a placement be assessed?

Yes

Often substantial artefacts generated

Replicates ‘real’ work

Gives value to output

No

Placements too short to allow a product to be completed

Not all placements lead to a product

Would put an added burden on employers

April, 2011Richard Hawkins and Harvey Woolf 8

Issues 3: Could more use be made of e-assessment?

Yes

Facilitates feedback

Allows collaborative learning (wikis, for example)

Taps into students’ experiences as ‘digital natives’

No

Overestimates students’ (and tutors’) digital competence

Limited research evidence to establish value

Not cheat proof

April, 2011Richard Hawkins and Harvey Woolf 9

A final two-part question

April, 2011Richard Hawkins and Harvey Woolf 10

Types of placement modules

April, 2011Richard Hawkins and Harvey Woolf 11

Assessment methods

April, 2011Richard Hawkins and Harvey Woolf 12