bridge # msas 105(ctr st) over zumbro river...16402 sq. ft. / % n/a a - open ft. ft. list: postings:...

16
2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT BRIDGE # DISTRICT: COUNTY: CITY/TOWNSHIP: Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: Inspected By: Report Written By: Report Reviewed By: Final Report Date: 55517 MSAS 105(CTR ST) over ZUMBRO RIVER District 6 Olmsted Rochester 06/15/2016 Forsyth, Roy Roy Forsyth City or Municipal Highway Agency Owner: Minnesota STATE:

Upload: others

Post on 20-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 2016 UNDERWATER

    BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

    BRIDGE #

    DISTRICT: COUNTY: CITY/TOWNSHIP:

    Date of Inspection:

    Equipment Used:

    Inspected By:

    Report Written By:

    Report Reviewed By:

    Final Report Date:

    55517

    MSAS 105(CTR ST) over ZUMBRO RIVER

    District 6 Olmsted Rochester

    06/15/2016

    Forsyth, Roy

    Roy Forsyth

    City or Municipal Highway AgencyOwner:

    MinnesotaSTATE:

  • UNDERWATER SUMMARY 3

    UNDERWATER INSPECTION 4

    UNDERWATER INSPECTION PROCEDURES 6

    STRUCTURE INVENTORY 7

    ELEMENTS 8

    PICTURES 12

    DRAWINGS 15

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    PAGE NUMBER

  • Contractor:

    (A) Reinspect the submerged substructure units at the normal maximum recommended (NBIS) interval of sixty (60) months.

    Collins Engineers, Inc.

    9687Contractor Job Number:

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    REPORT SUMMARY

    UNDERWATER INSPECTION

    The substructure units inspected below water at Bridge No. 55517, East and West Abutments and Piers 1 and 2, were found to be in good condition with no defects of structural significance observed. The channel bottom appeared to be stable, and the scourprotection system in-place around the substructure units was in good condition.

    (A) An area of poor consolidation was located 1 foot above the waterline along a joint at the upstream end of the West Abutment that measured 1 foot in diameter with up to 6 inches of penetration.

    (B) The concrete was typically smooth and sound with random minor areas of poor consolidation with up to 1 inch of penetration. A sloped concrete scour protection encased both piers from 2.3 foot below the waterline to the channel bottom, and was typically in good condition.

    (C) Three steel beams spaced at 6-foot centers were embedded in the concrete pier shafts near the waterline at both the upstream and downstream ends of Piers 1 and 2.

    (D) A vertical hairline crack extended from the bottom of the pier cap to the channel bottom at the downstream west quarter-point of Pier 2.

    (E) The channel bottom material consisted of sandy silt with up to 6 inches of probe rod penetration.

    INSPECTION FINDINGS

    Page 3 of 16

  • WATERLINE DATUM4.

    6.2

    Water Level Reference:

    975.4Waterline Elevation (feet):

    The top of the pier cap at the north end of Pier 1.

    Substructure(s) Inspected:

    SUBSTRUCTURE INSPECTION DATA3.

    East and West Abutments and Piers 1 and 2

    Maximum Water Depth at Substructure(s) Inspected (feet):

    The piers consist of oblong rectangular shafts with a pointed upstream end and a rounded downstream end that are supported by rectangular footings that are founded on steel H-piles. The abutments consist of solid vertical walls with perpendicular wingwalls. A sloped concrete scour-protection apron surrounds each of the piers and extends along both abutments.

    General Shape:

    Code:Item 61: Channel and Channel Protection:

    7

    9

    Code:Item 62: Culvert:

    5.

    The waterline was approximately 13.0 feet below reference. Description:

    NBIS CODING INFORMATION

    Code:Item 60: Substructure:

    (Minnesota specific codes are used for 92B and 113)

    None/Negligible

    District:

    MSAS 105(CTR ST)Facility Carried:

    District 6

    Bridge Description:

    055 - OlmstedCounty:

    BRIDGE DATA1.

    UNDERWATER INSPECTION

    Bridge #:

    ZUMBRO RIVERFeature Intersected:

    55517

    Weather Conditions:

    06/15/2016Date of Underwater Inspection:

    Waterway Velocity (ft/sec):

    1.0 ftUnderwater Visibility (feet):

    INSPECTION DATA2.

    The superstructure consists of three spans of multiple steel stringers supporting a reinforced concrete deck. The bridge is supported by two reinforced concrete abutments and two reinforced concrete piers, which are founded on steel piles. The piers are numbered 1 and 2 from the west to east.

    Professional Engineer/Team Leader:

    Roy A. ForsythInspection Diver:

    Roy A. Forsyth

    Page 4 of 16

  • 885 Scour 11 EA

    215

    1

    143 1LFReinforced Concrete Abutment 144

    STRUCTURAL ELEMENT CONDITION RATING6.

    No (Mark your selection with an X)

    Item 113: Scour Critical Bridge: Code:

    Y 48 06/2016Item 92B: Underwater Inspection: Code:

    Yes X

    P

    Bridge is scour critical because abutment or pier foundation is rated as unstable due to observed scour at bridge site.

    CS4CS3CS1 CS2

    LF 99100210 Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall

    Conditions

    Quantity UnitElement DescriptionELEM #

    Page 5 of 16

  • The routine underwater inspection of Bridge 55517 (East Center Street/MSAS 105 over the Zumbro River) was completed on June 15, 2016. The underwater inspection was conducted from 14 ft boat. The inspection was conducted by a team consisting of a PE-Diver with a valid MnDOT Team leader certification, a backup diver and a dive tender. The inspection utilized commercial dive equipment and techniques (SSA and/or SCUBA) in accordance with OSHA regulations. Profiles were taken along the upstream and downstream faces of the bridge and around the periphery of substructure units to determine the presence, location and area of scour. The bridge elements inspected consisted of 2 reinforced concrete pier walls and 2 reinforced concrete abutments. According to the bridge inventory or design drawings, Piers 1 and 2 and the East and West Abutments were founded on steel H-piles. Inspection procedures followed FHWA guidance and the MnDOT Bridge and Structure Inspection Program Manual with channel bottom probing to search for bottom foundations. The routine underwater inspection frequency is recommended to remain at a maximum of 60 months based on those findings and risk factors. Also, inspection procedures should continue to follow the above approach and standard guidance with 100% Level I and 10% Level II intensity efforts.

    INSPECTION PROCEDURES

    UNDERWATER INSPECTION

    Page 6 of 16

  • Spec. Feat.Pier Foundation (Material/Type)

    1 - CONCCantilever ID

    + W A T E R W A Y +Number of Spans Historic Status

    3 - FTG PILE

    Underwater 60Culvert Type 3 - FTG PILE

    Pinned Asbly.

    06/15/2016

    Barrel Length

    225.2 ft. Navigation Control

    Waterway Opening (sf.) 3477Structure Length

    ft. Year Painted 1993

    0 - No nav. control on waterwayDeck Width (Out-to-Out) 62.0

    + P A I N T +

    APPR: 0 TOTAL:5 - Not eligible

    MAIN: 3

    Main Span Length 82.5 ft.Drainage Area (sq. mi.) 239.7

    B R I D G E D A T A +Main Span Detail

    0 - SUBSTANDARD+ M I S C.

    Appr. Span Type Structure Flared

    GR Termini N - NOT REQUIRED

    Appr. Guardrail

    Main Span Type 4 - Steel Continuous Median Width On Bridge

    ft. Bridge Railing 1 - MEETS STANDARDS

    0 - SUBSTANDARD

    Main Span Design 01 - Beam Span

    ft. GR Transition

    Skew 30 LEFT

    Y/N Freq Date

    Abutment Foundation (Material/Type)

    1 - CONC Frac. Critical

    2 - Riveted

    D E P T H I N S P. +Appr. Span Design

    0 - No flare+ I N

    Appr. Span Detail Field Conn. ID

    Parallel Structure N - No parallel structure

    Pier Protection

    0 - Not Required

    Rating Date 05/06/20169914 sq. ft. Traffic

    ft. 50B. Rt 7.80Sidewalk Width 50A. Lt 7.80

    Roadway Area (Curb-to-Curb)

    Posted Load 0 - Not Required

    PostingStructure Area (Out-to-Out) 13962 sq. ft.

    DBL:VEH: SEMI:

    Rt 17 ARail Type Lt 17 C 2 - Straddle 2 Lanes

    1 - No Restriction

    B 1 - No Restriction

    N - Not Applicable Overweight Permit CodesCurb Height Lt

    ft. Horizontal 0 - Not Required

    0.75 ft. Vertical0.75 ft. Rt

    Wear Surf Install Year 1992

    16402 sq. ft. Nav. Vert. Lift Bridge Clear. (ft.)

    P - STBL - PROT INPL

    Year 2007Primer Type 4 - Organic Zinc - non 3309 MN Scour Code

    Painted Area

    Unsound Paint % Nav. Clr. (ft.)

    _

    Deck Material 1 - Concrete Cast-in-Place 0.0Wear Surf Type 4 - Low Slump Concrete

    Vert. 0.0 Horiz.

    S I G N S +Operating Rating 2 - HS TRUCK

    0 - None + B R I D G E

    Inventory Rating 2 - HS TRUCK 15.80

    26.40Deck Rebars Install Year

    Deck Rebars

    Finish Type M - UrethaneWear Course/Fill Depth 0.12 ft.

    0 - None

    Design Load 5 - HS 20

    + C A P A C I T Y R A T I N G S +Deck Membrane

    44 1

    Inspector Name Forsyth, Roy

    Latitude Control Section (TH Only) Status' 24.65 ''

    2 - 2-way traffic

    Routine Inspection Frequency 24

    Sect., Twp., Range

    0.3 MI E OF JCT TH 63 Level of Service 1 - MAINLINE

    - 14W Roadway Type36 - 107N

    Detour Length 1.0 mi.R A T I N G S +

    Custodian 04 - City or Municipal Highway Agency

    Owner 04 - City or Municipal Highway Agency

    Deck 6 Unsound Deck %

    C O N D I T I O N27 '

    A - Open

    Longitude 92 001+00.450 + N B I 27.13 '' Reference Point

    Crew

    + I N S P E C T I O N +

    Agency Br. No. 189

    District 06

    Bridge Match ID (TIS) 0 Userkey

    MSAS 105(CTR ST) over ZUMBRO RIVER

    Minnesota Structure Inventory Report

    Bridge ID: 55517

    + G E N E R A L + + R O A D W A Y +

    Date: 07/28/2016

    Sufficiency Rating 76.3Roadway Name or Description

    105

    City Rochester

    Routine Inspection Date 12/12/2014

    Desc. Loc.

    Township MSAS 105

    Number

    NRoadway O/U Key Route On StructureMaint. Area Structurally Deficient

    NRoute Sys 05 - MSASCounty 055 - Olmsted Functionally Obsolete

    Lanes

    Waterway Adequacy 6Max. Vert. Clear.

    ft.Legislative District 30Aft.Potential ABC 2 - N/A ft.

    ft.On - Off System Roadway Width 44.00 ft.

    Vertical Clearance ft.1 - ON

    Underclearances N

    Service On 5 - Highway-pedestrian Appr. Surface Width+ S A F E T Y F E A T U R E S +

    5 - Waterway Bridge Roadway Width 44.0

    50.0 ft.

    Service Under

    ft.

    43.9 ft. Approach Alignment 8Horizontal Clear.

    ft.

    ft.+ S T R U C T U R E + Lateral Clearance

    HCADT ADTT7

    Year Built 1968

    MN Year Reconstructed Functional Class

    %Channel 9

    Substructure

    0Superstructure 7

    ON 3 UNDER

    9200 YEAR 2008BMU Agreement ADT

    Structure Evaluation 6If Divided

    D I M E N S I O N S +Bridge Plan Location 4 - MUNICIPAL

    6/1/1969Deck Geometry 5

    NB-EB SB-WBDate Opened to Traffic

    + R D W Y

    FHWA Year Reconstructed

    MN Temporary Status

    17 - Urban - CollectorCulvert N

    A P P R A I S A L R A T I N G S ++ N B I

    Page 7 of 16

  • County:

    City:

    Township:

    Township:Section: Range:

    Span Type:

    NBI Deck: Super: Sub: Chan: Culv:

    Appraisal Ratings - Approach: Waterway:

    Required Bridge Signs - Load Posting:

    Horizntal:

    Traffic:

    Vertical:

    MN Scour Code:

    Open, Posted, Closed:

    Location:

    Route:

    Control Section:

    Local Agency Bridge Nbr.:

    Ref. Pt.:

    Maint. Area:

    Length:

    Deck Width:

    Rdwy. Area/ Pct. Unsnd:

    Paint Area/ Pct. Unsnd:

    Culvert:

    Olmsted

    Rochester

    107N36 14W

    4 - Steel Continuous 2 -Stringer/Multi-beam or Girder

    6 7 7 9 N

    8 6

    0 - Not Required

    0 - Not Required

    0 - Not Required

    N - Not Applicable

    P - STBL - PROT INPL

    0.3 MI E OF JCT TH 63

    05 - MSAS 105 001+00.450

    225.2

    62.0

    9914 sq. ft. / %

    16402 sq. ft. / %

    N/A

    A - Open

    ft.

    ft.

    Postings:List:

    MINNESOTA BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

    09/14/2016

    Inspector: CO Bridge

    BRIDGE 55517 MSAS 105(CTR ST) OVER ZUMBRO RIVER

    Unofficial Structurally Deficient N

    NUnofficial Functionally Obsolete

    Unofficial Sufficiency Rating 76.3

    ELEMNBR ELEMENT NAME INSP. DATE QUANTITY

    QTYCS 1

    QTYCS 2

    QTYCS 3

    QTYCS 4REPORT TYPE

    Reinforced Concrete Deck 07/28/2016 13962 SF 13683 0 279 012 Underwater

    13962 SF 13683 0 279 0Migrated Values

    Notes: [2012 - 2014]Transverse cracks w/ efflorescence at various locations. Moderate density.

    Several spalls from jackhammering through deck when repairing delaminated areas in past years.

    SPAN #1 (West)

    SPAN #2 (Center)

    SPAN #3 (East)Spall between girders 4-5 at midpoint'04 - Delam between girders 1-2.'07 - 1'x1' Delam between girders 4 & 5, 1'x1' spall between girders 5 & 6 @ mid pt. 2010 exposed rebar 09 - .5'x1' delam between 3-4 midspan. 2012 exposed rebar

    510 - Wearing Surfaces 9914 SF 9716 0 198 0

    Notes: Low Slump Overlay with Uncoated Rebar Notes: 92 - Deck scarified 0.5', delaminated areas removed and a 1.5'' low slump overlayplaced.'95 - Superficial cracking with minor surface abrasion and scaling.[2012 - 2014 ] Moderate cracking of moderate density.

    Underwater 07/28/2016

    9914 SF 9716 0 198 0Migrated Values

    Steel Open Girder/Beam 07/28/2016 1539 LF 1529 10 0 0107 Underwater

    1539 LF 1529 10 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: 93 - Girders have been sandblasted and painted this fall. Painted in 2009[2012 - 2014]Scattered paint failures with rust.

    515 - Steel Protective Coating 16402 SF 16295 0 107 0

    Notes: [2016] Migrator used inventory quantity of 16,402 SF and estimated the condition states.

    Underwater 07/28/2016

    16402 SF 16295 0 107 0Migrated Values

    Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall 07/28/2016 135 LF 134 1 0 0210 Underwater

    135 LF 135 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: W. Pier[2007 - 2014] - 5 vertical cracks on W. face.

    E. Pier[2007 - 2014] - 3 vertical cracks E. face.

    Page 8 of 16

  • Reinforced Concrete Abutment 07/28/2016 188 LF 175 10 3 0215 Underwater

    188 LF 175 10 3 0Migrated Values

    Notes: [2016] Migrator added 40 LF to abutment quantity to account for wingwalls (CS1:40 CS2:0 CS3:0 CS4:0).[2012 - 2014] Vertical cracks at various locations on both abutments. Moderate cracking under 3rd bearing and between 5th and 6th.

    WEST ABUTMENTCracks under & between girders 4-5 and 6-7 are 1/16' wide.Cracks under & between girders 2-3 is 1/8' wide.Black stains over most of abutment face.24in. storm sewer is cracked at first joint. 15in. storm sewer is sheared off 1.5' at first joint.

    EAST ABUTMENTWater leakage on bridge seat onto abutment face producing black stains over most of abutment face.21in. storm sewer is cracked at back face of abutment. 2 diagonal at connection w/ N wingwall. Spall at S utility 3sf with exposed rebar severesection loss.

    Wingwall notes: [2012 - 2014] Caulk at floodwall cracking.[2014] Pothole developed in bituminous parking lot adjacent to NW wingwall joint NW of abutment. 1.5x1.5x1.5NE & SE abutment connections are 1/16'SE - Vertical crack @ 2' & 8' from abutment connection.NE - Vertical crack @ midpoint & 2.5' from connection.SW - Diagonal and vertical crack of face.

    Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap 07/28/2016 135 LF 135 0 0 0234 Underwater

    135 LF 135 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: [2012 - 2014]EAST PIER Vertical cracks in pier face under girder 3 and between 2-3.

    [2012 - 2014] WEST PIER Vertical cracks in pier face between and under girders 3-4 and 5-6.

    Pourable Joint Seal 07/28/2016 89 LF 1 44 0 44301 Underwater

    89 LF 1 44 0 44Migrated Values

    Notes: 93 - 2' Bit felt joint on E end. Joint at W end has opened up, neoprene seal is at bottom of joint, joint is full of dirt and has been hot poured over.'95 - West joint at approach panel is missing the hot pour sealant.

    [2010 - 2014] Joints filled with bit

    Compression Joint Seal 07/28/2016 102 LF 0 102 0 0302 Underwater

    102 LF 0 102 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: [2012 - 2014] Adhesion failure all joints. Water leaking at west abutment. Covered with bit and hot pour.

    Movable Bearing 07/28/2016 21 EA 21 0 0 0311 Underwater

    21 EA 21 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: [2012 - 2014] Minor rusting of bearings.

    Fixed Bearing 07/28/2016 7 EA 7 0 0 0313 Underwater

    7 EA 7 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: [2012 - 2014] Minor rusting of bearings.

    Reinforced Concrete Approach Slab 07/28/2016 2000 SF 0 2000 0 0321 Underwater

    2000 SF 0 2000 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: [2016] Migrator assumed an approach slab length of 20FT and used the inventory quantity of 50FT for the width.93 - New E approach panel placed, new approach curb & gutter at all corners of bridge.'04 - West approach panel has settled aprox. 2".'07 - West settlement has been filled w/ bit.[2012 - 2014] Moderate cracking of panels, West panels 2" settlement filled with bit. E approach settled 1/2".

    ELEMNBR ELEMENT NAME INSP. DATE QUANTITY

    QTYCS 1

    QTYCS 2

    QTYCS 3

    QTYCS 4

    BRIDGE 55517 MSAS 105(CTR ST) OVER ZUMBRO RIVER

    REPORT TYPE

    Page 9 of 16

  • Metal Bridge Railing 07/28/2016 446 LF 446 0 0 0330 Underwater

    446 LF 446 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: [2016] Migrator assumed concrete/metal combination type rail.Vertical cracks in concrete rail base, at various locations, along length of rails.'97 - N metal rail has impact damage on E end. Support bracket bent.'99 - SE end block and section of metal rail were damaged by traffic impact. The end block and rail section were replaced late fall of '99'07 - Vertical cracks in concrete rail base at railing connections09 - .5'x.5' delam se cor, spall at sw abut ex rebar

    [2012 - 2014] Concrete base has vertical cracks at railing connections.

    515 - Steel Protective Coating 999 SF 999 0 0 0

    Notes: [2016] Migrator assumed CS1 and a quantity of 999 SF.

    Underwater 07/28/2016

    999 SF 999 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Reinforced Concrete Bridge Railing 07/28/2016 446 LF 446 0 0 0331 Underwater

    446 LF 446 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: [2016] Migrator assumed concrete/metal combination type rail.Vertical cracks in concrete rail base, at various locations, along length of rails.'97 - N metal rail has impact damage on E end. Support bracket bent.'99 - SE end block and section of metal rail were damaged by traffic impact. The end block and rail section were replaced late fall of '99'07 - Vertical cracks in concrete rail base at railing connections09 - .5'x.5' delam se cor, spall at sw abut ex rebar

    [2012 - 2014] Concrete base has vertical cracks at railing connections.

    Critical Deficiencies or Safety Hazards 07/28/2016 1 EA 1 0 0 0800 Underwater

    1 EA 1 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: NO CRITICAL FINDINGS OBSERVED DURING THE LAST INSPECTION.

    Secondary Members (Superstructure) 07/28/2016 60 EA 60 0 0 0855 Underwater

    60 EA 60 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: [ - 2014] No defects noted

    Concrete Shear Cracking 07/28/2016 1 EA 1 0 0 0883 Underwater

    1 EA 1 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: Use this element to monitor the presence of shear cracking on concrete elements. Pay particular attention to the concrete pier caps.

    Scour 07/28/2016 1 EA 1 0 0 0885 Underwater

    1 EA 1 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: P - Stable due to protection. Inspect countermeasures.

    Slopes & Slope Protection 07/28/2016 1 EA 1 0 0 0892 Underwater

    1 EA 1 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: Slopes - concrete flood control walls. no defect noted.

    Deck & Approach Drainage 07/28/2016 1 EA 1 0 0 0894 Underwater

    1 EA 1 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: Use this element to rate the condition, function, and adequacy of the drainage system.

    ELEMNBR ELEMENT NAME INSP. DATE QUANTITY

    QTYCS 1

    QTYCS 2

    QTYCS 3

    QTYCS 4

    BRIDGE 55517 MSAS 105(CTR ST) OVER ZUMBRO RIVER

    REPORT TYPE

    Page 10 of 16

  • Sidewalk, Curb, & Median 07/28/2016 1 EA 0 1 0 0895 Underwater

    1 EA 0 1 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: [2012]Transverse cracks in walks at various locations along length of walks.Light scaling of S walk at W end. Misc spalls at various locations of N and S walks.

    [2012 - 2014 ] Moderate cracking of light density and light cracking of moderate density, curb edges cracked. approach joint filler missing. SWcurb settlment. Numerous repaired spalls. SE approach walk cracked and settled near utility manhole/vault.

    '93 - New walk approach panels @ NW, SW, & SE corners.'94 - Spalled areas on bridge walk has been patched. SW walk approach has cracked.'00 - Approach panel curb at NW corner has settled. A large void is developing under the walk.'07 - Gap at NW approach panel

    NW and SW panels replaced, NE Approach walk and curb heaved and damaged.

    Protected Species 07/28/2016 1 EA 1 0 0 0900 Underwater

    1 EA 1 0 0 0Migrated Values

    Notes: Use this element to track the presence of protected species living on this structure.

    General Notes:

    Inspector's Signature Reviewer's Signature

    Inventory Notes:

    Inspectors: David Moore, Kyle Schlink, Josh Fjetland.

    Channel & Protection'91 - Flood Control Project has completed channelization work.

    ******* Other Items ( City Use ) *******6in. gas main support is missing from W span.

    [ - 2014] Watermain insulation is damaged/missing. Watermain in E and W span has sharp & substanial deflection.

    [- 2014] Gas main and Electrical conduit corrosion prevalent.

    58. Deck NBI:

    36A. Brdg Railings NBI:

    36B. Transitions NBI:

    36C. Appr Guardrail NBI:

    36D. Appr GuardrailTerminal NBI:

    59. Superstructure NBI:

    60. Substructure NBI:

    61. Channel NBI:

    62. Culvert NBI:

    71. Waterway Adeq NBI:

    72. Appr RoadwayAlignment NBI:

    Moderate cracking of overlay, Joint filler needs repair. Settlement in approach slabs, curb and walk moderate cracking.

    ELEMNBR ELEMENT NAME INSP. DATE QUANTITY

    QTYCS 1

    QTYCS 2

    QTYCS 3

    QTYCS 4

    BRIDGE 55517 MSAS 105(CTR ST) OVER ZUMBRO RIVER

    REPORT TYPE

    Page 11 of 16

  • Photo 2 - View of East Abutment, looking east.

    Photo 3 - View of West Abutment, looking west.

    Pictures

    Page 12 of 16

  • Pictures

    Photo 4 - View of East Pier, looking east.

    Photo 5 - View of West Pier, looking east.

    Page 13 of 16

  • Pictures

    Photo 6 - View of poor consolidation at upstream end of West Abutment, looking west.

    Page 14 of 16

  • Page 15 of 16

  • Page 16 of 16

    CoverTable of ContentsUnderwater SummaryUnderwater InspectionUnderwater Inspection ProceduresStructure InventoryElementsPicturesDrawings