by: anirban basu sage policy group, inc. october 17 th, 2014 back to the future part ii on behalf of...

43
By: Anirban Basu Sage Policy Group, Inc. October 17 th , 2014 Back to the Future Part II On Behalf of The Arizona Builders’ Alliance

Upload: dale-robertson

Post on 26-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • By: Anirban Basu Sage Policy Group, Inc. October 17 th, 2014 Back to the Future Part II On Behalf of The Arizona Builders Alliance
  • Slide 2
  • Raging Bull (1980)
  • Slide 3
  • Estimated Growth in Output by Select Global Areas 2014 Estimates* *IMF Staff Estimates The IMFs global and regional growth figures for 2014 are based on new purchasing power parity (PPP) weights derived from the recently released 2011 International Comparison Program survey. **For India, data and forecasts are presented on a fiscal year basis and output growth is based on GDP at market prices. Source: International Monetary Fund, October 2014 WEO Database
  • Slide 4
  • Debt by Selected Country 2014 Projected Source: International Monetary Fund, October 2014 WEO Database
  • Slide 5
  • RankExchangeIndex% Change 4Tokyo SENikkei 22556.7% 2NasdaqNASDAQ Composite38.3% 1NYSE GroupDJI A26.5% 6Frankfurt SEDAX25.5% 8Bolsa De MadridMadrid General21.4% 12Swiss ExchangeSwiss Market20.2% 5EuronextCAC 4018.0% 10BorsaItalianaFTSE MIB16.6% 3London SEFTSE 10012.0% 9TSX GroupS&P TSX Composite9.6% 11Hong Kong ExchangesHang Seng Index2.9% 7Shanghai SEShanghai Composite-6.8% Top 12 Stock Exchanges 2013 Growth* Source: Yahoo! Finance *Change from the 2012 close to the 2013 close.
  • Slide 6
  • S&P Select Sector Performance 12-Month Percent Change as of October 10 th, 2014 Source: Standard & Poors
  • Slide 7
  • Federal Reserve Balance Sheet v. S&P 500 Index May 2008 October 2014* Source: Federal Reserve Bank; Yahoo Finance S&P 500 index depicted in orange *Through 10/8/2014
  • Slide 8
  • Second Quarter Earnings for Select Corporations Earnings per Share SymbolQ2 2013 Q2 2014 Estimated Q2 2014 Reported SurpriseSymbolQ2 2013 Q2 2014 Estimated Q2 2014 Reported Surprise CMG$2.82$3.09$3.50$0.41BTU$0.33-$0.29-$0.28$0.01 COF$1.87$1.82$2.04$0.22DD$1.28$1.17 $0.00 UTX$1.70$1.71$1.84$0.13GE$0.36$0.39 $0.00 FCX$0.22$0.51$0.58$0.07MMM$1.71$1.91 $0.00 COH$0.89$0.53$0.59$0.06AMD-$0.09$0.03$0.02-$0.01 TXN$0.58$0.59$0.62$0.03YHOO$0.35$0.38$0.37-$0.01 DOW$0.64$0.72$0.74$0.02STI$0.68$0.76$0.72-$0.04 HON$1.28$1.36$1.38$0.02UPS$1.13$1.25$1.21-$0.04 VFC$0.32$0.35$0.36$0.01MCD$1.38$1.44$1.40-$0.04 XRX$0.27$0.26$0.27$0.01MSFT$0.66$0.60$0.55-$0.05 VZ$0.73$0.90$0.91$0.01CAT$1.45$1.53$1.69-$0.16 Source: Yahoo! Finance
  • Slide 9
  • Top Gun (1986) Profits out of the Danger Zone Source: BEA, BLS, S&P Case-Shiller, Yahoo! Finance
  • Slide 10
  • The Golden Child (1986) Highest Earning Hedge Fund Managers, 2013 Source: Forbes ManagerHedge Fund Firm2013 EarningsNet Return George SorosSoros Fund Management$4 billion22% David TepperAppaloosa Management$3.5 billion42% Steve CohenSAC Capital Advisors$2.3 billion19% John PaulsonPaulson Enhanced$1.9 billion26% Carl IcahnIcahn Enterprises$1.7 billion31% James SimonsRenaissance Technologies$1.1 billion18% Ray DalioBridgewater Associates$900 million5.25% Ken GriffinCitadel$900 million19.25% Larry RobbinsGlenview Capital$750 million43% Leon CoopermanOmega$730 million25% 2013 S&P 500: +29.6%
  • Slide 11
  • Airplane! (1980) David Teppers Move against the Market Source: Forbes, Bloomberg 2013 Appaloosa Management: +$3.5 billion (42%) Our big play versus the market is airlines. Thats a big play. Were the biggest holder of all these different airlines. No hedge fund owned as many airlines as we did and not too many people did. Delta, UAL, LCC, US Air, AMR. We owned big percentages in all those stocks. And you know what, they did pretty good pretty freaking good. -David Tepper
  • Slide 12
  • Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Median Weekly Earnings, Full-Time U.S. Workers* 2000Q2 through 2014Q2 *SA, Constant 1982-1984 dollars (adjusted to CPI-U) Wage and salary workers ages 16+
  • Slide 13
  • Source: Moodys Economy Recession Watch as of July 2014
  • Slide 14
  • Industrial Production January 2001 through September 2014 Source: Federal Reserve The industrial production index measures the real output of the manufacturing, mining, and electric and gas utilities industries.
  • Slide 15
  • Gross Domestic Product 1990Q1 through 2014Q2 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
  • Slide 16
  • Contributions to GDP Growth by Component 2013Q2 2014Q2 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
  • Slide 17
  • Ordinary People (1980)
  • Slide 18
  • Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics September 2014: +248K Net Change in U.S. Jobs, BLS January 2002 through September 2014
  • Slide 19
  • National Nonfarm Employment by Industry Sector September 2013 v. September 2014 All told 2,635K Jobs gained Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • Slide 20
  • National Construction Employment Monthly Net Change September 2000 through September 2014 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Industry Sector14-Sep14-Aug13-Sep1-net12-net12-% Construction6,079.06,063.05,849.016.0230.03.9% Residential Building677.5671.3617.86.259.79.7% Nonresidential Building696.9 676.10.020.83.1% Heavy & Civil Engineering Construction918.3917.8889.30.529.03.3% Specialty Trade Contractors3,786.03,777.23,665.88.8120.23.3%
  • Slide 21
  • State-by-state Growth in Construction Jobs August 2013 v. August 2014 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics *Construction, Mining, and Logging are included in one industry. STATE Year-over- year Ch. (000) STATE Year-over- year Ch. (000) STATE Year-over- year Ch. (000) FLORIDA43.5NEW YORK4.3OREGON0.4 CALIFORNIA35.6MICHIGAN3.4MASSACHUSETTS0.2 TEXAS27.7NORTH DAKOTA3.2IDAHO0.0 ILLINOIS11.1CONNECTICUT3.0NEW HAMPSHIRE0.0 PENNSYLVANIA10.8WISCONSIN3.0HAWAII*-0.1 LOUISIANA9.5ARKANSAS2.9NEW MEXICO-0.2 UTAH8.4ALABAMA2.4DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA*-0.2 MINNESOTA7.9IOWA2.2KENTUCKY-0.3 INDIANA7.6OKLAHOMA2.2MONTANA-0.3 NEVADA7.2KANSAS2.1ALASKA-0.4 TENNESSEE*7.0DELAWARE*2.1MISSOURI-0.4 NORTH CAROLINA6.7MAINE1.8SOUTH DAKOTA*-0.4 GEORGIA6.0SOUTH CAROLINA1.4OHIO-1.5 WASHINGTON5.9NEBRASKA*0.9WEST VIRGINIA-1.8 MARYLAND*5.5RHODE ISLAND0.7MISSISSIPPI-3.7 COLORADO4.8VERMONT0.7ARIZONA-5.4 VIRGINIA4.5WYOMING0.5NEW JERSEY-11.3
  • Slide 22
  • Arizona Nonfarm Employment by Industry Sector Groups (SA) August 2013 v. August 2014 Absolute Change Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics AZ Total (SA): +51.3K; +2.0% US Total (SA): +2,551K; +1.9%
  • Slide 23
  • Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale MSA Nonfarm Employment by Industry Sector Groups (NSA) August 2013 v. August 2014 Absolute Change Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Pheonix MSA Total (NSA): +42.2K; +2.3% AZ Total (SA): +51.3K; +2.0% US Total (SA): +2,551K; +1.9%
  • Slide 24
  • U.S. Year-over-year Percent Change: 1.9% Employment Growth, U.S. States (SA) August 2013 v. August 2014 Percent Change R ANK S TATE %R ANK S TATE %R ANK S TATE % 1NORTH DAKOTA4.418MISSOURI1.835KANSAS0.8 2NEVADA3.518SOUTH CAROLINA1.835PENNSYLVANIA0.8 2TEXAS3.520MASSACHUSETTS1.637ILLINOIS0.7 2UTAH3.520MINNESOTA1.637MICHIGAN0.7 5FLORIDA2.820WISCONSIN1.637MISSISSIPPI0.7 6DELAWARE2.723ARKANSAS1.537NEW MEXICO0.7 6OREGON2.723LOUISIANA1.537SOUTH DAKOTA0.7 8NORTH CAROLINA2.425KENTUCKY1.342NEBRASKA0.6 9COLORADO2.325MAINE1.343IDAHO0.5 10GEORGIA2.227IOWA1.243VIRGINIA0.5 11CALIFORNIA2.127NEW YORK1.245MARYLAND0.4 11TENNESSEE2.127RHODE ISLAND1.245NEW HAMPSHIRE0.4 11WASHINGTON2.127WYOMING1.245VERMONT0.4 14ARIZONA2.031ALABAMA1.148CONNECTICUT0.3 14INDIANA2.031HAWAII1.148OHIO0.3 14OKLAHOMA2.031WEST VIRGINIA1.150NEW JERSEY0.1 17MONTANA1.934DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA1.051ALASKA-0.8 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • Slide 25
  • U.S. Unemployment Rate: 6.1% Unemployment Rates, U.S. States (SA) August 2014 RANKSTATE%RANKSTATE%RANKSTATE% 1NORTH DAKOTA2.817VIRGINIA5.633WEST VIRGINIA6.6 2NEBRASKA3.617WASHINGTON5.636ILLINOIS6.7 2SOUTH DAKOTA3.617WISCONSIN5.636NEW MEXICO6.7 2UTAH3.621OHIO5.738ALASKA6.8 5VERMONT4.122INDIANA5.838NORTH CAROLINA6.8 6HAWAII4.322LOUISIANA5.840ALABAMA6.9 6MINNESOTA4.322MASSACHUSETTS5.841ARIZONA7.1 8NEW HAMPSHIRE4.422PENNSYLVANIA5.841KENTUCKY7.1 9IOWA4.526ARKANSAS6.343OREGON7.2 10WYOMING4.626FLORIDA6.344CALIFORNIA7.4 11IDAHO4.726MISSOURI6.344MICHIGAN7.4 11MONTANA4.729MARYLAND6.444TENNESSEE7.4 11OKLAHOMA4.729NEW YORK6.447DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA7.6 14KANSAS4.929SOUTH CAROLINA6.447NEVADA7.6 15COLORADO5.132DELAWARE6.549RHODE ISLAND7.7 16TEXAS5.333CONNECTICUT6.650MISSISSIPPI7.9 17MAINE5.633NEW JERSEY6.651GEORGIA8.1 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • Slide 26
  • Unemployment Rates, 20 Largest Metros (NSA) August 2014 RankMSAUR RankMSAUR 1 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Metropolitan Statistical Area3.89 Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ Metropolitan Statistical Area6.3 2 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Metropolitan Statistical Area5.312 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL Metropolitan Statistical Area6.6 3 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area 5.4 12 St. Louis, MO-IL Metropolitan Statistical Area6.6 3 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area5.414 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE- MD Metropolitan Statistical Area6.7 5 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH Metropolitan NECTA 5.5 15 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Metropolitan Statistical Area6.8 5 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area 5.5 16 Baltimore-Towson, MD Metropolitan Statistical Area 7.0 7 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropolitan Statistical Area5.617 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area 7.7 8 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area6.218 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI Metropolitan Statistical Area 7.9 9 Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI Metropolitan Statistical Area 6.3 19 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Metropolitan Statistical Area 8.0 9 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ- PA Metropolitan Statistical Area6.320 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area8.7 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • Slide 27
  • Field of Dreams (1989)
  • Slide 28
  • 15-Year & 30-Year Fixed Mortgage Rates February 1995 through October 2014* Source: Freddie Mac *Week ending 10/16/2014
  • Slide 29
  • U.S. New Home Sales January 1999 through August 2014 Source: U.S. Census Bureau
  • Slide 30
  • U.S. Housing Starts January 1999 through August 2014 Source: U.S. Census Bureau
  • Slide 31
  • U.S. Housing Building Permits January 1999 through August 2014 Source: U.S. Census Bureau August 2014: 1 Unit: 626K 5 Units or more: 343K
  • Slide 32
  • S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices for Select Metros July 2014, 12-Month Percentage Change Source: Standard & Poors
  • Slide 33
  • Source: The American Institute of Architects Architecture Billings Index January 2008 through August 2014 August 2014: 53.0
  • Slide 34
  • Nonresidential Construction Put-in-Place December 2006 through August 2014 Source: U.S. Census Bureau Dec. 08: $697.4 billion August 14: $603.7 billion -13.4%
  • Slide 35
  • National Nonresidential Construction Spending by Subsector August 2013 v. August 2014 Source: U.S. Census Bureau
  • Slide 36
  • Inputs to Construction PPI January 2001 August 2014 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • Slide 37
  • Construction Materials PPI 12-month % Change as of August 2014 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • Slide 38
  • The Shining (1980)
  • Slide 39
  • Sales Growth by Type of Business September 2013 v. September 2014* Source: U.S. Census Bureau *September 2014 advanced estimate
  • Slide 40
  • Conference Board Leading Economic Indicators Index August 2007 through August 2014 Source: Conference Board
  • Slide 41
  • Coming to America (1988) Economy gained momentum over the course of last year; Tailwinds included booming stock market, lower gasoline prices, stabilizing global economy, and consumer expenditures on interest rate sensitive durable goods like housing and autos; The current year is associated with greater certainty regarding federal budgeting and monetary policy that helps; The world is not perfect - black swan threats remain: (1) Iran (2) Israel/Iran (3) Europe (4) contagion (5) cyber (6) EMP; Healthcare reform could slow full- time hiring over the course of the year; and Regions with rapid population growth and/or significant import/export activity, industrial output and energy production will lead the way Arizona poised to be an outperformer.
  • Slide 42
  • Thank You Follow us on Twitter @SagePolicyGroup You can always reach me at [email protected] [email protected] Please look for updates of information at www.sagepolicy.com. www.sagepolicy.com Also, if you need us in a hurry, we are at 410.522.7243 (410.522.SAGE) Please contact us when you require economic research & policy analysis.
  • Slide 43
  • 15-Year & 30-Year Fixed Mortgage Rates February 1995 through October 2014* Source: Freddie Mac *Week ending 10/9/2014