.-

,

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON

BY-LAW Number ___ 4_S_-_8_4 ________ _

To adopt Amendment Number 30 to the Official Plan of the City of Brampton Planning Area.

The Council of The Corporation of the City of Brampton, in accordance with the

provisions of the Relional Munici£.a11tt of Peel Act, and the Planninl Act,

hereby ENACTS as follows:

1. Amendment Number 30 to the Official Plan of the City of Brampton

Planning Area is hereby adopted and made part of this by-law.

2. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to make application to the

Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing for approval of Amendment

Number 30 to the Official Plan of the City of Brampton Planning Area.

RE40 a FIRST, SECOND and THIRD TIME and Passed In Open Council

This 20th day of February 1984.

L~~-= KENNETH G. WHILLANS - MAYOR

.. • l.l' •

. ;' .. .. . :

BEFORE:

Ontario Municipal Board

IN THE MATTER OF Section 39 of The PlrDDiD9 Act (R.S.O. 1980, c. 379 ,

- and-

IN TIm MAftER OF an applJ.caUon by t:ha Corporation of the City of Bramp1:On for approval of its Restricted Area By-law 56-83

- and-

IN THE MATfi:R OF Section 34 of The Planning Act, 1983

- and -

IN THE MATTER OF appeals by John W. Maletich on behalf of ~e Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Robert Lackey on behalf of R. Khana and D. Mongia and Aleksandar Antoniuk in respect of Zoning By-law 46-84 of the Corporation of the City of Brampton

R 840194

W.B.J. THOMPSON', Q.C. Vice-chairman

) ] 1

Monday, the 27th day

of Au9'U~t, 1984

THESE MAHlmS haVing come on for public l1Etar:Lng J

~E BOARD ORDERS that By-law 56-83 is hereby approved;

AND THE BOAlU) FURTHER ORDERS that the appeals wj.th respect

to By-law 46-84 are hereby dismissed.

, . - ::. ...... --- -~--..-.:~

SECRETARY

.. - '. ~ .~r.": ....... .

, ... ,

DUPLICATE C1RJGINAL / - /'

AMENDMENT NUMBER 30 ~---

to the Official Plan of the

City of Brampton Planning Area

~" ,~~

Amendment No. 30

to the

Official Plan for the

City of Brampton Planning Area

This amendment to the Official Plan for the City of

Brampton Planning Area, which has been adopted by the

Council of the Corporation of the City of Brampton, is

hereby approved in accordance with section 21 of the

Planning Act, R.S.O. 1983, as Amendment No. 30 to the

Official Plan for the City of Brampton Planning ARea.

Date •• t?/{IL . .3~:)" I~!.f. . ...

.' .I; •

. ,

,: :1 I. "

•

" ;. ' . . , I; ,! l: i' f,

i 1';

•

.'

i J I'

THE CORPORATIOti OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON

BY-LAW 45-84 Number __________________ _

to adopt Amendment Number 30 to the Official Plan of the City of Brampton Planning Area.

The Council of The Corporation of the City of Brampton,

provisions of the Regional Mun1cipa1itI of Peel Act,

hereby ENACtS as follows:

in accordance with the

and the Planning Act,

Amendment Number ............ 3 .. 0 ___ to the Official Plan of the City of Brampton

Planning Area is hereby adopted and made part of this by-law.

The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to make application to the

Hiu:1ster of Kuu:1cipal Affairs and Housing for approval of Amendment

Number 30 to the Official Plan of the City of Brampton Planning Area.

READ a FIRST, SECOND and THIRD TIME and Passed In Open Council

This 20tb day of February 1984.

/~ KENNETH G. WHILLANS

'I

Ii I: 11 I' ~i

I! 't " ,I

r "

j

" il f , :'

AMENDMENT NUMBER __ 3 ... 0 __ TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN

1. Pureose:

The purpose of this amendment is to change the land use designation of

two parcels of land shown outlined on Schedule A to this amendment

from Rural to Commercial, and to set out appropriate principles for

the development of the subject lands.

2. Location:

The two parcels of land subject to this amendment are as follows:

1. one parcel is located at the north-east corner of Goreway Drive

and Highway Number 7 j and

2. the other parc~l is located at the north-west corner of Number 15

Sideroad and Highway Number 50.

3. Amendment and Policies Relative Thereto:

The Official Plan of the City of Brampton Planning Area is amended:

(a) by changing, on Schedule A thereto, the land use designation of

the lands shown outlined on Schedule A to this amendment from

RURAL to COMMERCIAL;

(b) by deSignating, on Schedule F thereto, the lands shown outlined

on Schedule A to this amendment as "HIGHWAY AND SERVICE

COMMERCIAL" ;

(c) by changing, on Schedule A thereto, the land use designation of

the lands shown outlined on Schedule B to this amendment, from

RURAL to COMMERCIAL, and identifying it with the number "23";

(d) by designating, on Schedule F thereto, the lands shown outlined

on Schedule B to this 'amendment as SITE SPECIFIC DESIGNATION,

and identifying it with the number "23";

(e) by adding to PART II, CHAPTER 2, Section 2.2, the following:

"2.2.19 SITE 23 (Part of Lot 16, Concession 12, N.D.)

Definition

The property designated ~Commercial" and identified

by the number 23 on Schedule A may be used for

limited office purposes in conjunction with a

single-family dw~lling.

The permitted office purposes will be specified in

the zoning by-law.

- 2 -

Policies

2.2.19.2 Vehicular access or egress to or from Hlghway Number

50 shall not be permitted.

2.2.19.3 The floor area of the office uses permitted on the

property shall not exceed the floor area of the

single-family dwelling.-

I

-- Umit of Lands Affected

OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT Schedule A

CITY OF BAAMPTON Planning and Development

Date:B3 I) 25 Drawn by: R B 1:8000 FIle no. no. SQ..

>.

· '.

-- Limit cI Lands Affected

OFFICIAL A..AN AMENDMENT Schedule B

CITY OF BRAMPTON Planning and Development

Drawn.,,1 RB na.1&1

BACKGROUND MATERIAL TO AMENDMENT NUMBER _ ... 3_0 __ _

Attached is a copy of a repOrt of the Director of Planning Policy and

Research, dated November 9, 1983, a copy of the notes of a public meeting

held on January 12, 1984 and a notice of said meeting.

i -I

....

INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM I rl fc;.-· ~.11/1(3

Office of the Commissioner of Planning & Development

.ov .. be~ 9, 1983

to: !be Cba1nan ad MaUers of PlaIlft1D1 c:o.tttee

ftOK: J.A.. Marshall, Director of Plallft1D1 roU.c1 aa4 les .. reb

RE: Zouna 8y-law 56-83, The TOl'01ICO Core Colllprebeulft %01l1DS 8y-lav Clerk's File: 19.26 Our Fl1e. TU

8ACltG&OUD:

, '1

At lta lleeclas of 48ausc U, 1983, Co_ell adopted a _libel' of '14l1li111.

Coaittee reco_ndatioGa to aaeftCI the Tor01lto Gore CoIIlprebenal"~ ZoolDS

8y-lav. These reco ... ftClatlou were baaed 011 Plaoolna Committee', cOtlSld-. .

eraC100 of a ataff report that reapollClecl to a _libel' of objectlou to the

aubJect b,-lav.

The reco ... nded ameadaentl are aa followa:

• the zouas by-law aad the Official PlaD 'a to be .... ded to pel'll1t

Blah-, eo_relal uea OIl two propertlea located at the north ..... t

conal' of Co~eva, Drift aDd 81,hva, Nullber 7

• ehe zOallll by-law aod Official Plaa are to M .. nded to pel'll1t a

co.blned .ltllle-fae1I, dwell1n. aDd office uea of l1e1ted scale at the

Gorth .. est conal' of NWlber 15 S148ro'" aod 81,hva, "ullber 50

• ehe froue portlOQ of a proper" GIl tbe aut aide of Airport Road Goreh

of Nuaber 10 Slderoad 18 to be zoned 1ft a speclal catesory to reeoSfttze

aD exl.e1as ,arden centre bul1dlas aad realdetlCe

.....

--2-

• t!ut CODlaa .p. ue to .. _.eeI to show floodplala .... couleteat

with the latest N.T.R.C.&- floodp1atD .. p,laa

• tbe open space soae 18 to be .. ade4 to pena1t acee,solf use.

• Scheclul.es 1-1 aD4 1-2 are to be nn.. la accordaDc. vith the latelt

l.q1oaal 10 ..... Setback leqa1nMllta

A -uer of staff-lldtlate4 _""'lIt. were al.o adopt" aad are laclw!e4

111 the Ult below.

Staff baft alao __ 41receed to 11lftst1sate the us. of bol41.. &GUS 1ft

the mral .. etlaellt of Colenlae. lefore holcJiaa _1188 call be 1IIple­

.. tecl. &Il overall _1I41IIeu to the Otflelal 'lall 18 reqGlre4. Thl. uad­

ment is currelltl, ua4er preparatioll 8114 Vill be before • public meetias on

Roveaber 30. 1983. UPOIl approval. of tb1a an .. ae. scaff v1ll prepare a

repore on the poI.ible use of bo141... b,r-lava ill the Coleraiae 8ltuation.

As a result of the appUcatlo.. of tile bJ-1av ~ fGrther staff hylev. a

IlUIIber of fGrcher ueact.uts .re propos. to the b,-law to 1.,rove the

voreli. ad to 1ntroduce farther pr091810111 to mN effectlftly replate

laad UM 111 the forar 'fovaab1, of 'fOl'Ollto Gore. These _"IICS are as

follows:

• lIltrocJace a deUaltlol1 of -Mult laten.l ..... t hrlour- 111 oreler to

clearl, cJeflne thi. ue. 'rbla UI. Is exelMe4 frOil the area covered by

By-law 56-83 111 thac It 1s aGt set out .. a pamttecl purpose 111 any

aODe

• rayle. cJefla1tloa of -Bu11cJlaa Area- aad 11ltrocJuce • DeW cJ.flD1tlol1 of

-Accessory Bullell .... Bu11cJ1aa Area- 1II oriel' to mre effecel.,ely rela­

late tbe 81ze of accesaol'1 1naiW ....

• raYlI. the cJefl111tlO11 of -1.ac Width.- to reflect the 1I08t G, to etat. cJefl111tlO11 uaecJ 111 other City b,r-lava

•

• -3-

• reorsaD1ae the aect10G dealll11 with acceaaor'f bulldtllla to ute it

eaater to follow aacl to appl,

• htrodue a helpt reetrlctioa of 2.4 _cree for acceasory bu11dllll alld

aaraae cIoora

• lntr'OCluce provlaloaa co replace 1IaIIe occupatlou that vere taadYere-

8IItl1 oaiteecl fro. B,-lav S6-83

• the ailll ... arouad noor area for _la (real4eatlal) 1Nl1d1ap vaa

r.dueecl fRa 18S aquare I18tres to 170 aquare _trea for Olle atore,

bul1411l88 aad fro. 140 aquare _trea co 115 aquare .. trea for bul1dlass

banlll DIre thaa ODe atore, la order to make theae requlre_nta .,re

reaaol\8b1e

• ta the lural Eatate 80141111 ZOIle aad the Asrlcultural-Sectlon S20 Zoae

(Iural latate Ixpanaloa Area), larsa accesaory bulld'a,. Oft lata

areater cbaa 2 beceares (S acrea) "'la alze 1141 oDl, 1ae couc"ructecl of

MOOd or _cal. th1a preventa large brlck or coacrete atruccures fro.

bellil coutructed 1II these areaa aacl posalbl, d1sNptlas future aub­

dl91s10a patterDa

• the froat yard require_at 1a the Serwtce co..erclal Zone is tacreased

froa S _cres to 15 _trea dace the latter ataaclard 1a lllare approp­

rlate for a rural area

• the pera1cted purpoaes la the lecreaCloul CoIIIIIerc1a1 Zone have been

l1ated la .ore detall 1a order to mare clearly deflue wh1ch exact uses

.y be ea tabl1ahed 1a thia 80ae

• a -aursery- baa beea adeled as a pera1tted purpoae 1n the Comaerc1al

Agrlcultural %oDe (ia add1tlO1l to -Iardea centre sales establishment-)

• 1n accordance with established alte plaD control practlce, a provis1on

-has beea added that prohiblta fencea 1ft the front yards of tllduscrtal

Zone a

.. - --_ .. _ .. _------------------------

-4-

• the _1Ilmwa lot vtcIth (frause) 1D the Ill, 112. K3 aad K4 zones has

beeA lIl=eased froa 24 Mtres to 30 _tres to reflect CUl're1lt ltanclarcla

in this ar ..

• oa the basu of neeac slt. plall cotlcrol praccte.. the K1tl111W1

Laadaeape. Opea Space lD Waatrla1 loDes 1I&s Mea reclacecl froa SOl to

301

• the _Ill... lot al.. for aev lots lD the qrlcaltaral Zou bas beeD

lacr .. s .. 11'_ 4 bectaru (10 acra) to 30 hectares (7' acrea) to

cllscoura.. lars_ la. .."erallCes. 1'be ...,erallCe of IIIIa11 lots ln che

Aartcaltlll"al Zoae la accorallc. vith the Cltl' of Braapccm aDd "aloa of

'eel Severaace Po11c, vou1cl require. coftCUrrellt rezouq to the lural

letat. two ZODe

• the require.llts aD&l restl'1cC1ou r.laC1q to lot vtdth all4 ,ari depth

ba.,. been .eC out .. paratel, for lots leas tball 5 hectares (12.5 acr.s)

.~ for lots1 areac_r thall , hect~rea ·111 t.he "rtcultural Zolle. The

provbloH relac1q to the laraer lots ar. 14ent1cal to tho.. 1D the

fOrEr Torollto Core Zouq By-law !lwaber 825 au those for the s1l8118r

lots are Uentleal to those III the 112 Zoll.

• Aceeslor7 bu11c11q requlre""tl &IlII restrictlolls 111 the Aldcultural

Zoae haft bea set out separatel, for lotI le.. than 2 hectares (5

acr •• ) aad for those areater thall 2 hectares 1n accordance with

eu.tiq ta,-lawa

The "arloua amelldaamts appro'lecl b7 CoUllell and recOlllll8tlCle4 by staff are

contalud tn the attached proposed ZOUDI b,-lav. Also attached is an

Officlal Plall Alle1ldme1lt that affeee. the propert1es at the corth-east

coner of Gorevay Dr1". aDd B1ahvay Nwaber 7 aad at the north_est corner

of Humber 15 Sl4eroad aDel l1ahway RaabeI' 50. Thi. Offtcial Plan Ameadmeac

1. neces.aTY 1a order that the '801l1q be chaqed in accorclaace vi th

Council'. direction. To comply with tbe requlre.1lCs of the new Plannlns

Act. 1t 1& propos.d that the attached propo.ed ameucluGU to 'y-law 56-83 -

...

- ~ -- ----------- --- - - -- - -

.,.

aDd the Off1c:lal Plaia be the subject of a pubUc .. tlq. Staff propose

that this aetlq be c:oud"ccecl as All opeD ho"se at tbe Castle.re "'hUc

School.

IECOKHENDAnOHSa

• that the attachecl _adIIIent to By-lav ,6-83 and the attachecl Offlcial Plaia

AmeD4mnt be the s"bject of a ",blle: .. tll18.

COBC1Dl:

r.l. Dal.ell. Coal •• lour of Plaut. aad Dnelos-ent.

JAK/kab

,WD Jo1m A. Marsball, N.C.I.P., Director of Plamal. PoUcy and le.earch.

PUBLIC MEETING

A Special Meeting of Planning Committee was held on January 12, 1984, in the Castlemore Public School Gymnasium/Auditorium with respect to Amendment to By-law 56-83, THE TORONTO GORE COMPRE­HENSIVE ZONING BY-LAW, and a related Official Plan Amendment.

An Open House was conducted from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., at which staff answered individual questions on the by-law.

Copies of the proposed by-law and Official Plan Amendment were available at the meeting.

The Public Meeting commenced at 8:00 p.m.

Members Present: Alderman T. Piane, Chairman Councillor P. Robertson Alderman M. Annecchini

Staff Present: F. R. Dalzell, Commissioner of Planning and Development

J. A. Marshall, Director of Planning Policy and Research

P. Schwartzberg, Policy Planner L. Pandy, Assistant City Solicitor

Approximately 140 members of the public were in attendance.

The Chairman enquired if notices had been sent and if newspaper advertisements had been placed.

Mr. Dalzell replied in the affirmative.

Mr. Marshall presented the details of the proposed by-law and related Official Plan Amendment.

Mrs. Ang, 60 Kenny Court, Wildfield, had the following questions and comments:

•

•

•

wanted an explanation of the new definition of Accessory BUilding, Building Area.

can zoning address the finishing of a house before people move in?

do wood accessory buildings have to be maintained?

- cont'd. -

•

- 2 -

indicated that she does not want adult entertainment parlours in the Toronto Gore area.

Staff explained the definition of the by-law regarding Ac~essory Building, Building Area; and indicated that the inclusion of the Adult Entertainment Parlour definition made it possible for the City to more clearly exclude these uses since the said use is not permitted in any zone.

Staff indicated that the occupancy of a new building is subject to Building Code standards, and that maintenance of buildings is dealt with under the Minimum Maintenance and Occupancy By-law.

Carl Lee, Airport Road expressed the following concerns regarding the proposed CA Section 527 Zoning on Airport Road for a garden centre sales establishment:

•

•

•

the property is currently being used by a fencing company (Brown & Oakes).

there are 8 foot high stacks of materials stored on the site.

firewood is being sold on the site.

does the garden centre sales establishment definition permit the sale of firewood, fencing and lumber?

After Mr. Marshall read the definition of garden centre sales establishment aloud, Mr. Lee expressed his objection to the commercial zoning because he considered the definition to be not sufficiently specific to exclude the use of the property for other undesirable purposes such as a fencing company.

Mr. Tony Castellano, Leonardo DaVinci Drive, requested and received an explanation of the maximum height provisions related to garage doors.

Mr. John Sproveri, McVean Drive, had the following questionl comments:

• empty lots in existing subdivisions should be sold before new areas are subdivided - could a time limit be put on as to when houses are constructed on lots?

- cont'd. -

" .

- 3 -

expressed concern regarding the maintenance of vacant lots, e.g. weeds, grass, etc ••

Mr. Pandy indicated that time limits cannot be imposed relating to construction of houses on lots;' and tndicated that maintenance of lots falls under the Minimum Maintenance and Occupancy By-law.

Laura Rubino, Tenth line, eqnuired as to the inclusion of acces­sory uses in the Open Space Zone.

Mr. Marshall indicated that this was included to permit concession buildings in such areas as the Claireville Conservation Area.

There were no further questions or comments and the meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m.

Written submissions (see attached) were made by the following:

1. 26 property owners (per Carl Lee), objecting to the proposed CA Section 527 Zone on the east side of Airport Road, north of No. 10 Sideroad.

2. Mr. & Mrs. John E. Raymond, R.R. #4, regarding the proposed CA Section 527 Zone.

3. Motorola Information Systems (formerly ESE Ltd.) per Leo F. Longo, relating to front yard requirements in Industrial Zones.

4. The Sorbara Group per Heather Ford, regarding Industrial parking requirements.

..

January 20. 1984.

r/:rs. D.' Sutter Chairpenon Planning Committee ~ City of Brampton 150 Central Park Drive BRArf.Pl'ON. Ont. L6T 2T9

Attn. Planning & Development Dept.

Dear rt.adaml

RE, M~END~ENT TO BY-LAW 56-83.

-­/1

We the residents of the Toronto Gore and adjacent area wiah to put forth an objection with regards to the proposed amendment to the FRONT PORTIOr~ OF A PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF AIRPORT ROAD NORTH OF NUrl.BER 10 SIDE ROAD TO BE REZONED IN A SPECIAL CATEGORY TO RECOGNIZE A GARDEN CENTRE AND RESIDENCE (wEST HALF OF LOT 11. CONCESSION 1. N.D.). for the following reasons.

1. The property io in the centre of an area 'zoned residential and agricultural with the nearest residents only 200 feet away.

2. The noise factor from trucks and forklifts delivering gravel. railvay tics, lumber for fencing. patio slabs. firewood and related supplies would be appreciable.

3. A Garden Centre operates long hours and not f!!! but seven days per week. This will have very adverse effects on the residents of the surrounding area, as the cite is exposed to several existing residents on the north. south and west.

4, The part of the property to be used for the Garden Centre has only approximately 150 feet frontage and therefore cannot be properly screened or bermed.

s. ~he area does not need another Garden Centre as it is already well served by seven Garden Centres within a radius of four miles of the property.

6. If granted. it will probably only encourage other property owners to apply tor the same zoning. and it will be very difficult for the City of Brampton to refuse. thus defeating the very purpose of zoning.

In view of the present implications, we plead with you not to endorse this application, for the extended use of the above­mentioned property.

• .• 2

..

I I J

- 2 -

We would appreciate being kept informed of any actions contemplated or taken in regards to this matter.

l:!Y! ., iZA t(." t. £l " , . ,. . J,o.~ .. • r£ Iii V,. jt..'-

Signature • y .

~~. , .' .... /1// ~ .);1t.,., l..~--.,.,.,...,.J--'::-_ ?", ..

t;. /, -L ~ ". . Co. ·tt ';:'~l... to. (.. ..

Yours truly.

Lot Number

/1

/1

;,

! l

I I 1 '-\

I?,.

/3

1"3

''I

Address

-ft It.. I~ ~1cA A' T J r (

b<#'/ 8ratt7pb L(,r 3$ I

II

. II

IJ

1/ /,

. . .. . .

• c.. ' ,. , .:.. : ~ I .. • . --:'. , •. ~ .... ".vp· ..... I -'

. I'

• ·3 ...

.. ." -, -Na:ne - Slp;nature

CCI ~r. K. Whillans. Uayor

Lot Nu.'7tber

12

I" .

/&rt II

II 1:Z Ie

Address

~r. P. Robertson, Councillor ,'lrs. If. Plane, Alderman

\_~ ~r. P. R. Dalzell, Commissioner ~ .. r. J. If.arshall. Director of Planning P 11 • 0 cy & Research

u

.. '--

, .'

. . . . ~ .

: r!l.! '~O!l, 'n;:.::l'· 0 J',.

Ja ... ·'· r" l~ ,.-::' .. , ',.' ".

i r. John l·larshall Jirector of: Flnnnin' :'olicy and ~:.(:SE·'" rch tat or ra:;j'l'~ton 130 ';cntr~l ~ nr:' l'i ve :ra ..... ,toT:, Ont;-'.r:i 0 16-;1 2Tj

. t.:! rei'p.rencr; t. on:." recent. ~O:1\'''~rf;;..:' ... i·:'~ ~···-',r(, n:' the. rOn05C:U f!:'Cl'!U~ .~nt. to the .!.' 0 1'(') , to ~o_' ~O!: ':'~':r:a!"si ve

"(lnir.e : V-lc.'il, soecL:ical1y a'che fr{"'.r.t nort: ':: ' of a !)ron­erty on the e;:.l~t ~i(.e o:~,: Airr·ort :,oa~ nori:,!! c:: :-1.'mber 10 5i~ieroad is 'Co i.e ~oned in a s;",ecif.J. ~ate-or:! to raco.'::--

. it' . t" ~ .. d • , or n~"e an ex s ::.n r,· O:-Cl r{!sr.. can re .,u~.'_c 'en -, an reSl.a.ence, \',"-, ·'!().1..cl iib: t.o lI.::~:(" :-:~C -:,'ollm,;-in- -'o~ ,t=:

.':-.e· ~.~:cncl!.~::lt =';"1;'0 .t= :'0 l~t'\i·;::':_i-·~ .. _._. !.: ~n !._lCi~~: U C'e -, T'l"l"on<"'.,..--· 0· ........... obt"-'rc'~' ·l·';l,~""· .,..r..,..,....~t w ••••••• _ .... -..,. VI •• 'W. ......_ , .. l... .----~ ... I ~ • ..;- .. J. ....

!or th~ commercir-l-usp. ruildin· on the ~ropcrty by reT)rC5cl~ti.:;'!. i~ c 5:: )I'i 1,(15 n . l1r.:e(i 1':'I!' t1 e s:tle of foodstufl'S and m; rc:. -:tl1d.ise '-ro'tr.1 or: :':.t:? nropert",·. Un<.ier the ~)'revio:.:s :.'o.,·mshi!' reroula .jions:, . fa:-ners ~lere permitted to erect s~!cll roadsi.::.e :·l:i:', in's in "rhich to sell nt'oduce raised 0:1 their f~U'-:,~s :tnc: su:.~­plus to their needs. Em/ever, th~ l';:i~.·:·:r.f: erected on t~is nropert~! is a ID.l"'r;e, ~'\e~ne'1t bu-~ ld i !',,.. nnt of the nature n 'rr.'-i.ttecl fo' tl:1s use. ;,.!=. ',ieJ.l, ~r- ~h~ n,rr has been "'row O!l tl:is pro!,ert~r for t~ ~ ~ w~e, nor no ue be:"ieve tLis ",as ever the intention.

,.e ~:lould lil:c t.o a,;,i t~." v T)reviot.:sl~r, t!:j~ mmer erected a i..uilc; il1f:~ l'or 'CIte rnanuf:acture Fl nO. sa le 0;" cement bloclcs, anti i~ took a court oroe:" by the ti:en Reeve, i<el Robinson, t~ c::'::.pel the o',mer t.o diem8.n~le the bUi Iding and desist from thi£ business. .\lso the property mmer on the adjace~.t propert;7 to tr.e north also obtained a i:uil(ling per:':15t for an accessory buildin6 for fana use \lhi::h he turned. into a i'oj business ol"cratin' todav. '~ourt actiiln on t.his illegal open ... tion \Ol3S interrupted by' th0 ar.lalt:~c..nc.""ion o£ 'J.'vron't'.o ':Tore 'fo\1nshio \;:i.th tha ';ity of I:ramn'ton.

;. t·.)

2. ! Gcause of our axnCrie!lCe in the "last, ,:e leel to ':'::. propertY' ot-m·- r, if ~i ven the lice:lse t,) ... -:-e:-::. -:.e c:. so-ca:'tled ~~rder. centre business ~:i~~l no" be of·1.:n'"i by a speci'i'ic design;,:~ion, out. :,i~_ll 1;'& free to o~ -<-r ... ·t.e a":Y cOY":!l.crcia.l c',lsiness 0:- m~nur~ct~.1ri:':-: he choo~es.

3. trot cml~t ~;ill it reauire persistent vi:'ilance by ad,ioinil"g 'Oroperty o-.mers such as us to note \'1hat he is doing, but any infraction ~':ill h' ve to be pursued in the co~rts for which we as taxpayers must pa~.

4. ',!e are not o~mosed to ruture develo"m.::-nt of' tLis pro­l)erty from "ut'!lo('r 10 '3it;eroarl ~ort=: to the 1St!, ~ ;"S highwa~T pro!,>ert.", it will lJeCOl.~e lore valuable and eventually r;evelopecl i an orc.-rl'-.r an c(}f.nrehensive manner •.

5. ,;'e h'!ve n .i."urther o(.jection in th:.t Airport Roa in this speci.fi: area is onl'" t"'10 la~es. ,.ith a business loca~ed here, there is bound to be t~ffic con~estion just as there is now in the summer time \then a vegetable grower parks his truck'along the ro~dside on ~he \-lest sit.e of Airl)ort rt.oa. and oPl)osite to this property under discuss:1.on. .ie h,: ve ha(i· !:'.any accidents at Airport Road and the number 10 Sideroac! intersection. Traffic on Airport ~oad is increasing to the extent that much of the traffic it mould be car~ng is being routed on Gore ~oa:-', I·!cVean Drive llnd Gore~'tay Drive to' Number 10 Sicieroad, none of which excer-t perhaps for Gore Road is surfaced to carrl hea~J traffic, nor is there traffic-light installation C:.t the Airport Poad and Numb~r 10 Siueroad to direct such traffic. It is common for traffic on Number 10 Sideroad to be backed up trom Airport Road east to our driveway, a ~ mile distant from the intersection during rush-hour traffic.

,Ie feel our objecti ns are reasonable and trust that '~ounci1 ,·;i11 postpone r;ranti 11g tl is license until such time as an orderlv and comnrehensive develonment of this area c~n take piace. . .

Yours truly,

9n~ ~ l:b:~ ~~ (l.ir. and I·irs. John E. Raymond)

...

~ or • .i:'reuerick I:'slzell ~oIluni~si.oner of : In; nin;; City of I rarJ!'ton 150 "';entr~~l }~.r~: 'rive Bra mpt on , Ont~rio L6J.' 2;.1.''")

Dear ~r. Dalzell:

· , .• ..J,. ;:.r.,L · ... f" , Cnt<: rio iel·. i., 1 ,:-:4

.,. ,..,

.L..Ul

Ref: Grantine~ license to oper~te a ::~rd~n centre

"1 _~ 1.

in the builciinr:": on thp, front nortion of a propert~' on the en~t si:ie o.!.' A:i rr'lort :ot\d, north or : tu:tber L; i:i '.tero~.d ._---.-.---------_ .. _----- -- --p----

jo:nclosed j s p CO~):, O.t" our 1ettc·r to .. '. vor o.::i llans ~_nd :.emb 'rs of ::it-r C;)ul'1ci1 ret"~rd:l!'lr; ~:,c ::: ove n: tter •

.. e trust tl; .... t oac!l nl'!:,ber of the lOla ni:1- ~cr.:::littee ~:jll receive ,1. con'! of our letter to cOl'1sL!e:r be~oore t .. e r.leetiw; sChedulec, 1,"'0~' r.'euru.ary 13, 1 ~R4.

Yours truly,

(John I. :l1·d Jia7.el (!. ~~):·mt''''nd.) .:;:;c1.

...

.... "

r.. ~. 4 r~m~ton, (nt", ri () :', ~' 3 a

fer:rtlnr:: ~. 1 "r4

l·:ayor .~nillans ~nd rembers of ~ram~ton ~ity' Council

Care of R. Everett. City ~lcrk ISO Central Park iJrive Bramnton, Ontario L6T 2T9

Dear J.ir •• 1h1llans and Council:

nef: Granting of license to operote a ~ardcn centre in the builriin~ on the front Dortion of a property on the east side of Airport -.oad, north of t!umber 10 Sidero;:d --- -.----.------------------

As adjacent property Ol"mers object! lit! to the ':r;1nti ng of t1',is license. below are our speciric objections.

1.

2.

).

Accordln~ to the a~ricultural ~onit>~ a'-nlvinr: to this proparty, the or-ly use for \1hich a bu11diiu: PCIT.l1t could have been issued ori~inally WAS for the sale of nursery stocY. ~ro~m upon the property. !!o\':ever. no nursery stock \las ever gro'tm upon this prnperty.

On the contraryl during l·!r. Russo's o .. mersl:i'" of the property, a bul dozer removed the topsoil from that portion of the property to the east of S:,lt ;';reek for cover; ng up iller;ally-dur.tped bric!:s rnd other construc­tion refuse.

Alvin ~rberry, &n experienced End cocpetent farmer tll.o has farmed ouch of the IF.nd in this ~rea tor rr.any years, includin~ our property, is unable to cultivate the property and it has been left ~o r-row noxious weeds, ~ menace to adjacent properties and in contra­vention of !rt'mnton's \'Ieed-control bylaw.

Our community is already ,,,ell-served by thp follo\·ri]"\g garden centres:

Glen EC~:Ot Imperial Garden ";entre and ~r::r.'!~lea ~··ruit and Garden ~entre on Higln1ay 7

Herold Oakley's and Litz Tree :~rm on Gore ~o~d Bolton £nd Vannin ~!urserics on the 17th ~ider~nd Heart TJ8ke !~urseries on Heart J.al:C' "'oad Humber Nurseries on Hi~hway 50 Jesll and Cullen and Fickett's on Pi""1n-1C:.r 27 l{en P.eeves in ·.loodbridge

...

\

2

~ayor .~illans ~nd City Council, ~eb. n, l~rL

5. irown and Onl<:es, the .firm now lensin~ the t,~i!.dir:"" fre·r.l the o\,mers, 457076 Ont. Lt",., 24 .;oocicr("st ··rive, ISlin~toni Ont~irio I·;SA 4J2. is not oper:~:..in--: a t"':,.rc:en centl"!, but a "rho ly fenci "g busir,ess, includi:~'" industrial fe'1cin'· 'Which re"uires the use of lar::e trucks, t.nnde::~s nna fork­lifts £.s \rell as a 1aree, properly-fenced and neat stor-ege area. This use is not cO::lpatible tiith the present predomjnantly residential use, and the 13r~e residp.nti£l area alreacly zoned for the l-lest side of.' Airport Eoad.

o. As a result. or t.he use or this 1,:·uildin·- U~! -.ro"in and rakes, there are em..,ty vehicles and e.,u~,pment, refuse lumber ~nd other waste material strewn abC"ut the property, 7,akinr.; it look ill-kempt and de~rading nei~hboring ~roperties.

7. J.ir!,ort ~oad from Hi ~h\1ay 7 north'rard is only a two-lane high,,:ay. an..i there is ::luch traffic con~(!stion in this area resultins in numerous accidents. An itinerant produce seller parl:s his vehicle on the \test side of Airport Road in this area, and contraJjP to th~ Cit.y bylaw which renuires roadside produce sales to have been raised on the adjacent property ot4ner's Dropcrty, hns been sellin; fresh produce purchased elsewhere inclu(~in~ r:ro ... :ers out­side !'ramnton. nrampton alrea(::" ~rovides a J'I1nce for this type of produce-sellin~ on the oarking lot .1u~t off 11ain St.reet, south of ':ueen.

e. r.~r. Lee, the pronert:---- o\-mer opposite to t.he T)ro~osed ~arden centre raises nroduce on his Ob~ attrnctive and tidy property and has comrlied l"tith the law in obta1ni:'~ the proper license to sell his produce nt roadside, uhich is all this hightlay can handle at r'resent.

9. ',':e underst,and. from our AlderT.".an thnt the o,mers of the property ~e~ween the nroposed garden centre ~nd 10 ~iderosd . adjacent to Airport Road are present1? pz·oposj nPo: chan~es for rezoning before the Ontario I,:~nicipal Board, and \17e think any changes in use should a\'iait decision b~' the voard on land use \·rhich \':111 nrobably encompass a larf!;er area \·rith acco;·lpanyirg reCluirements for service roads, utilities, proper land-drainage protecti0n si~ce ~art of this nroperty is flood-plain, and communlt? ~nd social considerntions. J. eooc: exa:-.lrle 01" proper plnnnin:: is the indust:!al 'evelo~:l("nt cO:lt£.inir~_" the '::;. -: wu!~din;; farther sou~:. on Airport ::oad ~i th off -ld :hi .... c.~r access. 'raina:e and co~unity considerations.

~':a:ror .:hillnns and City :ounc1l, Feb. r. 19~4

10. Since t1:is pronertv \;as first purch~1 sed bv :ar,1erl na Investments in 1960, it has hCEm a contintlO'tlS rl·oLle:n for the cornrnunit~r.

Rabbit raising "ms atter.mted ajt.iloul""h no one lived on the property to care for the aninm1s. 1're~1 '.1err- housed in & makeshift hutch \'Ii t.h improper food trucked out frorn ";oronto a.nd consisti;:g of food r3rba~·e ""1hich yielded en inevitable seire of rats, ju,.t as it {~1d for a s:'!"'!ilar ho~-raising operr.ti 'n on the propert.~,r at the north ..... est comer of: Airport Roo:' and 10 Sideroad, \:hich ,:as s!-:ut dO\4n lor health rensons.

A remshackle buildin,-: ~~&s then erected \·:it.hout a building Demit. 'this \"/as to be used as a ce!1ent block mt=>nufactur­ing business. It took a court oreer obtained L:' the TO\fflShip ?eeve to force disrnsntlinc of the buildinr:- and ceasint~ of the business.

A farm accessory building erected on the property \iaS burned to the ~round.

A erass fire ,,:as started on a S:..mdny \"Ilt:.ou~ a ri~e permit ant! \-lith the flemes fanned by the ~:ir~dJ t,hre~::t.ened nearby hones.

A fire occurred in the house presently e!"ect.ed on t.he property.

J. road crossing of Salt \:reek for machinery 'las irnnroperly constru~ted resultins in erosion and darna~e to the do\m­stream creekbed and properties, nnd floodi:l'": up!tream.

As mentioned, topsoil was removed by bulldozer o~erating on Sundays in a residentisl community \;1 th resultiT!:" noise disruption and leavill~ t:1e l~nd u:iuse3ble and \feed inrestede

A garden centre business has all-endy been attemrted and failed on the property. It is \11 til ":000 re~ son the conU'1Uni­ty suspect th£t the o\-mers/tenants may engage in SOI'!'le other illegal use, ~~th the resulting costs of admjristrative and court action or enforcement or the hylaw borne by taxpayers, \lestl/ood Tile and Drain being a previous such case.

In view of the above, we ba1ieve t~lF.t no license should be ~r~,nte l tor the illegal and unnecessary use or a g~rden centre, and trust tha~ Council will postpone any further land-use appli­cations until a plan tor t.he larger nrea i:; conceived, "lhich "till be cor.:,atible "lith the social and cornr.mnity needs of the area and eventual development can provide for proper off -hihh.,-lay access, utilities and protection of propert.y.

Yours t.ruly, ~,/ "./ ~..,

(JOh~-"~;'-d "Ha~~l1':~~:d {' /. :/' '."? u~_ cc John I:l!Irshall, Fredericl~ Dalr-ell

f!g~~ ~.y~y~ [;BRMI~AI. f~./U.~eoIfI, &r

pg~tr 2~ tQm,,,,oYf" &~"", JI,..;I :7-"'Pn4. C~UI4~ t,llsJ L 1.9

• /.J',uI_/~/"" ""I..:J·.?/~"~ • ~fo;"'411;-' '\·I..:Y-~"":;.1 .~;:t..r rl{)-21.'II,'KJ

!/,nd[1-/ R~.1· 2733 ~,~,ew~ 2031210293

January 9, 1984

Corporation of the City of Brampton 150 Central Park Urive Brampton, Ontario L6T 2T9

Attention: Mr. John Marshall

Dear Sirs:

Planninq , Development Dept.

Re: Toronto Gore Comprehensive Zoning By-law 56-83 Lands Zoned M3 - Sec. 513

/

As you are aware, our firm represents Motorola Information Systems Limited (formerly ESE Limited). OUr client owns lands located at the southeast corner of Airport Road and Williams Parkway. These lands, zoned M4 - Sec. 512, are subject to a requirement that the minimum front yard landscaped open space be no less than 50%. Our client constructed its facilities pursuant to that requirement and 1s most anxious that all other industrial developments in the vicinity also develop accordinq to that standard.

It has recently come to our attention that lands neighbourinq our client's site, and which are zoned M3 -Sec. 513, have no minimum front yard landscaped open space requirement at allt We assume that this omission was merely an oversight when the site specific provisions related to these lands were first formulated.

OUr client is very proud of its industrial facilities and 1s most anxious that future facilities located in the area are developed to the same hiqh planning standards.

2 •••••

City of Brampton - 2 - January 9, 1984

Would you be good enough to consider inserting within your up-coming "housekeeping" amendment to the above­captioned by-law a provision which will require a minimum front yard landscaped open space of 50\ for lands zoned M3 ~ Sec. 5l3? We believe there are strong planning grounds to support such a provision.

Acknowledgement of receipt of this request would be greatly appreciated. We would be most happy to discuss t.his 1'equest further with you at your convenience and we look forward to hearing from you.

Yours very truly,

LFL,dt

. .

• . .

THE . SORBARA GROUP. 1674 EGUNTON AVENUE WEST. TORONTO. ONTARIO M6E 2H3 TELEPHONES (416) 783-6156

Mr. R.A. Everett City Clerk City of RtBt-ar-upt .... on ISO Central Park Drive Branpton, attaria L6T 2T9

Re: Amendment to By-law 56-83 The Toronto Gore Canprel;!ensl ve By-law

Dear Sir:

(416) 781-5566 TELEX 06-527112

January 12 I 1984

We aTe in receipt of tte draft amendnent to by-law 56-83 and your letter of December 2, 1983 outlining additional changes to the by-law.

Sam-Sor Fnterpri.ses Inc., one of the developuent companies wi thin 'The Sorbara Group owns land in the Tormto Gore area. This property, of approximately 14 hectares, Is located at the south ..est comer of Highway 7 and The Gore Road and has been granted approval by the City for industrial deve1opoent. 1bus we aTe keenly interested in the proposed amendment to by-law 56-83. Generally we are in support of the proposed amendment and I would like to take this opportl.l1ity to extend our c:otq)l1ments to those involved in producing the draft by-law. It is very thorough and easy to t"ead and canprehend.

The only problem that we have with the by-law is the proposed parking requhements for industrial zones. Q\ fint reading of the draft by-law the parld.ng space requirements appeared high ,.,ntch pralipted a canparison of those established by other lII.1nicipalities. Seven other surromding ftU1icipalities were surveyed for their general industrial/manufacturing parld.ng by-law pravisions. For the purpose of comparing the parldng require­ments I have cCXDpJted the parking requi~ts for a hypothetical manufac­turing bullding of 1680 square metres with 1m. of the gross floor area (168 scpm! metres) devoted to office space. The parking requirements in Toronto Gore and the seven other nuUcipalities are shown below:

KJNICIPALI'IY

Proposed Toronto Gore By-law City of kampton

PARKING SPACES RFQJIRED

40 Spaces

40 Spaces

. .

. . - . -2-

Town of Vaughan 26 Spaces

City of Hlssissanga 29 Spaces

City of Scarborough 18 Spaces

City of North York 40 Spaces

City of Etobicoke 18 Spaces

Town of Pickering 30 Spaces

TCM\ of Oakville 22 Spaces

As can be observed, the parking requirements proposed in the new CoTe by-law are very high. Gore and North York with the highest requirements are a fell 16 spaces bigher than the average of the other umicipa1ities.

11115 heavy parking requirement. coupled with the requiresnellt that 5Cf4 of the required side yams and rear yards and 30%. of the required hont yard be landscaped, creates a particularly burdensane situation. The example of a manufacturing hd.lding of 1680 square met1:'eS was chosen because it represents a colfwuly required size building, as U!ll it t'epresents 4CJ'Io coverage on a one acre lot. Ole acre industrial lots are also very C011IDOI1 and viable and 40'10 coverage represents only a l1Xlderate building coverage. As can be obsetved fmu the attached drawing it is virtually impossible to achieve the parking required on a one acre industrial lot built to 141'1. coverage. The landscaping requirement of sot of the required side yard preclufes parking in the side yard

a as the lot w:ru1.d have to be considerable wider at the expense of decreasing the length of, the lot. 'lhe tear yard length is cri.tica1 however, and rmJSt be maximized to allow for adequate trucking.

4O'k coverage is a relatively low coverage which will achieve a low density appearance especially with the standards established for landscaping. We feel, bc:Newr, that with the proposed parking requirelnents 4CfI. coverage is impossible. 'lbis creates the U1fortunate situation that industrial lots in Gore are not canpetitive with those in neighbouring nuUcipalities _ 'Ibis, of course, repre­sents a hardship for the City of Btampton as well as the developnent industry. It is _11 docunented and widely accepted that industrial developnent of a flell . established and not of an otnoxious nature prcI\Tides many advantages Wich a~ felt outside of the inmediate increase in employment and assessment generated for the City_

For these reasons U! appeal to the City of BraIt1'ton to re-evaluate the parking standards proposed for industrial zones in the Toronto CoTe area - As can be observed merely from the quick poll mich was carried out by our office, the parking requirements proposed create a considerable burden_

HF/sg

cc: Mr. John A. Marshall City of Brampton PlaDuiDg Dept.

Yours truly.

THE SORBARA CRa.JP

~ tditl 1fit I Heather Ford Planner

• ".

"

_l~ - -- f:.~~ 1 - --- • , -- - ~

~. ~. ~ '...., ~ _ .:"1-'110 t80aaD __ ~ - .. - I

.. t~_ ~ ~eo ~.!J I ~J II~ Ii ;s .... ....

r.. r=:::-- .- - ._ io--.

I ... ~".~.l_ .. . -A---. _.JII:lt!I:I. ~

!

1 ~- --- lD5'oGO . •

t:, ~~ (~ -- . ~~ 6~ - - .. -. f(, aB~'" 1 ~ .... ..- - .-- ----- ~ .. - -- «.y~ ~ -----I!!l"e • i -..-

~ tl.

I~ If#BO "'Ill ~

'" :. ~~ !-.~~. ~lf!!lD 4111 • .-. ~ • .. J ~~ ~

- -- .IMJ~~ 111-._- , -, ~'r~-as~ lJon;. • ee.r£ )'AIZI) tJD't'. ~~...11"' F.C'e. -B:LI~.J4 -

. .. •

-- --------------

THE PLANNING ACT 1983

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BRA~PTON

ROTIC! OF PUBLt~MEETIRG

AMENDMENT TO BY-LAW 56-83; 'THE TOIONTO GORE COMPUHERSlVE ZONING BY-LAW

The Planntng Committee of the Council of the City of Irampton will hold a publle' meetlng/open bouse on THURSDAY, JANUAlY 12th •. 1984 for the purpose of obtaining pubUc input on a propos_ by-law to amend 'I-Isw 56-83, the Toronto Core Comprehensive Zoning By-law. The approval of this amending by-law also requires

_ a minor Offldal Plan Amenclment that will also be elbc:ussed at the pubUc meeting/open house. The meetlng will be held in the gymnasium/auditorium of Castlemore Publlc School, The Core Road, Brampton, Ontario, commencing at 5:00 p.m.

The open house vill commence at 5:00 p.m. and staff members vill be available to answer questions and receive written eOllllllents and objeetiou.

A fo~al pub11e meeting will be held at 8:00 p.m. to provide an opportunity for 1ndivlduals to present tbelr views verbally to Planning Committee.

Explanation- of Proposed Amending By-law (and related Official Plan Amendment) As a-result of a number of objections to By-law 56-83, COUDell 1s proposing a number of cbanges to the By-law to resolve some of tbese objections. In addition, a number of changes have been proposed to the By-law 56-83 to improve the requirements and restrictions relating to a number of zones.

The recommended .mendments are as follows:

the zoning by-law and tbe Official Plan is to be amended to permit B1ghway Commercial uses on two properties located at the north-east corner of Careway Drive and Highway Number 7.

the zoning by-law and Official Plan are to be amended to permit a combined single-family dwelling and office use. of limited seale at the north~est corner of Number 15 Side road and Highway Number SO;

the front portion. of .. property 01l the east side of Airport Road north of Number 10 Side road is to be zoned In a special category to recogn1%e an existLng garden centre boUding. and residence (Vest Half of Lot 11. Concesslon 7, N.D.);

the zoning of lands on the east side of The Gore Road, soutb of Blgbway Number 7 (West Balf of Lot 3, Concession 10. N.D.) has been changed from RE2 to Aj

• the zoning of lands located at the south~est corner of Number 17 Sideroad and Highway Number 50 has been changed from l!2 to Ai

• the zoning maps are to be amended to show floodplain zones consistent with the latest M.T.R.C.A. floodplain mapping;

the open space zone 1s to be amended to permit accessory uses;

Schedules B-1 and B-2 are to be revised in accordance ~tb tbe latest RegLonal Roads and Setback Requirements;

introduce a defInition of -Adult Entertainment Parlour- 1n order to clearly define this use. thIs use Is excluded from the area covered by By-law 56-83 in that it 1s not set out as a permitted purpose in any zone;

revise definition of -Building Area- and inFroduce a new definition of -Accessory Building. -BuUding Area- 1n order to IIIOre effectively regulate the size of accessory buildings;

revise the definition of -Lot VidthW to reflect the most up to date definition used In other City by-lavs;

reorganize the section dealing witb accessory buildings to make 1t easier to follow and to apply;

introduce a height restriction of 2.4 metres for aceessory buUding doors and garage doors; ..

, . ~ •

- 2 -

• introduce provlslons to regulate home occupations that vere Inadvertently omitted from By-law 56-83;

•

•

, tbe mio1mum ground floor area for mala (residential) buildiDII was reduced from 185 -square me'tres to- '170 square-- metres for OIle storey buildings aDd from 140 square metres to 115 square metres for bulldings having IIIOre than one storey ln order to make these requirements more reasonable;

ln the lural Estate Bolding Zone and the Agricultural-Section 520 Zone (,lural Estate Expanalon Area), larae accessory buildings 011 lots greater than 2 bectares (5 acres) ln slze may only be constructed of wood or metal. this prevents large brick or concrete structures frCIIII belna constructed in these areas and poss1bly dlsrupting future subdlvision patterna;

the front yard requirement in the Service Commercial Zofte is In~reased from S metres to 15 metres since the latter standard 1s more approprlate for a rural area;

• the permitted purposes In the lecreational Commercial Zone have been listed 11\ more detail ln order to more clearl,. define ¥bieb exact uses may be establlshed in this zone;

• a ·nursery· bas been added as a permitted purpose ln tbe Commercial Agr1cu1tural Zone (In addit19n to -garden centre sales establishment-):

in accordance witb estabUshed alte plan control practice, a provision baa been added that probiblts fences In tbe front yards of Industrial Zones;

tbe minimum lot width (frontage) 1n the MI, M2, 113 and M4 zones has been increased from 24 metres to 30 metres to reflect current standards In thls area;

• on tbe basis of recent site plan control practlee. the Hin111W1 Landscaped Open Space for front yards in Industrial Zones bas baeD reduced from 50% to 30%;

tbe 1I1nllDUm lot size for new lots 1n the Agricultural Zone has been increased from 4 beetares (10 acres) to 30 hectares (75 acres) to diseourage large land severances. The severance of small lots in the Agricultural Zone ln accordanee with the City of Brampton and leglon of Peel Severance Policy is sUll pe1'1ll1tted but would require a C:ODcurrent rezoniDg to the lural Estate Two Zone;

the requirements and restrictions relatlng to lot width and yard depth have been set oat separately for lots less than 5 beetares (12.5 acres) and for lots greater thall 5 hectares 10 the Agricultural ZOlle. The provisions relating to the larger lots are Identical to thoae 1n the former Toronto Gore Zoning By-law Number .825 and those for the smaller lots are identieal to those 1n the BE2 Zone, and

• Accessory building requirements and restrictions 1n the Agricultural Zone have been set out separately for lots less thall 2 heetares (5 acres) and for those greater than 2 hectares In aecordance with existing by-lawa.

Copies of tbe proposed by-law and Official Plan Amendment are available at the Planning and Development Department, ISO Central Park Drive, Iramptoo. Ontario, between tbe bours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., and will be avaUable at the public meeting/open house.

Any person may attend the public meeting and may make written or verbal representation either in support of, or In OPPOSition to, any of the above noted iteu.

For further information contact: MR. JOHN MARSHALL at 793-410, extension 251.

•

R.A. Everett City Clerk City of Brampton 150 Central Park Drive Brampton, Ontario L61 219

• .. . ,.

BBPORB~

Ontario Municipal Board

IN THE MATTBR OP Section 34 of Tbe Planning Act, 1983

- and -

IN 'mE. MATTBR OF an appeal! ~ this Board by Alan Purbacb~ and Irene Furbacher, in 'l'rWIt,

R 840182

on behalf of Correct Construction Co. Ltd. in respect of Zoning By-law 44-84 of the Corporation of the City of Brampton

D. S. COLBOURNE Vice-Chairman

) ), ) ) ) ) )

- and -

P. G. WILDS Member

Tuesday, the 24th day

of April, 1984

I'l' APPBARING that an appeal has been filed by Alan Purbacher

and Irene Purbac:her, in TruSt, on behalf of COnect

construction Co. Ltd. in respect of Zoning Sf-law 44-84,

TJIB BOARD ORDERS that the said appeal is hereby diam1ssed.

--..::. SBCRETARY