by randi azwar gulana srn. 0801120392digilib.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/344/1/abstract (ra).pdfsudah...

i

THE TEACHING OF WRITING SHORT FUNCTIONAL TEXT AT THE

ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF MAN 1 LAUNG TUHUP

THESIS

Presented to the Department of Education of the State Islamic College of

Palangka Raya in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement

for the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan Islam

By

RANDI AZWAR GULANA

SRN. 0801120392

STATE ISLAMIC COLLEGE OF PALANGKA RAYA

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION

1435 H/ 2014 M

ii

APPROVAL OF THE THESIS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Palangka Raya, March 2014

Approved by,

Advisor I,

Sabarun, M.Pd

ORN.196803222008011005

Advisor II,

M.Zaini Miftah, M.Pd

ORN.197509152009121002

Approved by,

Vice Director in Academic Affair ,

Drs. Fahmi, M.Pd

ORN.19196105201999031003

The Chair of the Department of Education,

Triwid S.N, M.Pd

ORN.197109142003122001

Title of the Thesis

Name

SRN

Department

Study Program

Level

:

:

:

:

:

:

THE TEACHING OF WRITING SHORT FUNCTIONAL TEXT AT

THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF MAN 1 LAUNG TUHUP

Randi Azwar Gulana

0801120392

Department of Education

Study Program of English Education

Strata 1 (S-1)

iii

PERSETUJUAN SKRIPSI

Palangka Raya, Maret 2014

Menyetujui,

Pembimbing I,

Sabarun, M.Pd

ORN.196803222008011005

Pembimbing II,


ORN.197509152009121002

Menyetujui,

Wakil Ketua Bidang Akademik

Dan Pengembangan Lembaga,

Drs.Fahmi, M.Pd

ORN.198012052006042003

Ketua Jurusan Tarbiyah,

Triwid Syafaratun Najah, M.Pd

ORN.197109142003122001

Judul

Nama

NIM

Jurusan

Program Studi

Jenjang

:

:

:

:

:

:

THE TEACHING OF WRITING SHORT FUNCTIONAL TEXT AT

THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF MAN 1 LAUNG TUHUP

Randi Azwar Gulana

0801120392

Tarbiyah

Tadris Bahasa Inggris

Strata 1 (S-1)

iv

OFFICIAL NOTE

Case Examination of Randi

Azwar Gulana’s Thesis


To. Director of the State Islamic College

of Palangka Raya

in

Palangka Raya

Peace is unto you and God’s mercy and blessing as well.

By reading and analyzing of thesis’s revision, we think that thesis in the name of:

Can be examined in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan Islam in English

Education of the Department of Education STAIN Palangka Raya.

Thank you for you attention.

Peace be with and God’s blessing.

Advisor I,

Sabarun, M.Pd

ORN.196803222008011005

Advisor II,


ORN. 197509152009121002

Name

SRN

Thesis Title

:

:

:

RANDI AZWAR GULANA

0801120392



v

NOTA DINAS

Hal Mohon diuji Skripsi

Saudara Randi Azwar

Gulana

Yth.

Palangka Raya, Maret 2014

Kepada

Ketua ujian Skripsi

STAIN Palangka Raya

di –

Palangka Raya

Assalamu alaikum Wr.Wb

Setelah membaca, memeriksa dan mengadakan perbaikan seperlunya,

maka kami berpendapat bahwa skripsi saudara :

Sudah dapat diujikan untuk memperoleh gelar Sarjana Pendidikan Islam.

Demikian atas perhatianya. Diucapkan terima kasih.

Wassalamu alaikum Wr.Wb.

Pembimbing I,

Sabarun, M.Pd

ORN.196803222008011005

Pembimbing II,


ORN. 197509152009121002

Nama

NIM

Judul

:

:

:

RANDI AZWAR GULANA

0801120392



vi

LEGALIZATION OF THESIS EXAMINATION

This thesis entitled THE TEACHING OF WRITING SHORT FUNCTIONAL

TEXT AT ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF MAN 1 LAUNG TUHUP in

the name of Randi Azwar Gulana, and his Students Registration Number is 080112

0392. It has been examined in the boards of examiners of the State Islamic College of

Palangka Raya on:

Day : Wednesday

Date : Dzulqaidah 22, 1435 H/ April 23, 2014 M.

Palangka Raya, April 23, 2014

Board of Examiners:

1. Santi Erliana, M.Pd

Chairman/Member

( )

2. Rahmadi Nirwanto, M.Pd

Member

( )

3. Sabarun,M.Pd

Member

( )

4. M.Zaini Miftah, M.Pd

Secretary/Member

( )

The State Islamic College of Palangka Raya

Director,

Dr.Ibnu Elmi.A.S.Pelu,S.H, M.H

ORN.197501091999031002

vii

THE TEACHING OF WRITING SHORT FUNCTIONAL TEXT AT THE ELEVENTH

GRADE STUDENTS OF MAN 1 LAUNG TUHUP

ABTRACT

Teaching English where writing as the skill that will be explored makes such

instructional process have its own challenge for the English teacher. Hence, the writer conducted

study on teaching of writing short functional text which almost to be the material for senior high

school level, especially eleventh grade level. The objective of study was description of teaching

of writing from the teacher who taught writing short functional text. The problems of study were

:1). How is the teacher’s readiness before teaching of writing short functional text? 2). How is

the teaching procedure in teaching of writing short functional text in context of Pre-teaching,

whilst teaching, and post teaching? 3). What are media used by the teacher on teaching of writing

short functional text? 4). How does the teacher evaluate the students’ writing in writing short

functional text? 5). How is the language teaching quality on teaching of writing short functional

text at the eleventh grade students of MAN 1 Laung Tuhup?.

The study was descriptive study with qualitative approach. It means the data were

collected from observation (Observation Guideline and Observation Checklist), Interview,

Documentation, and Field Note. The sample of study was Purposive Sample where the English

teacher who taught writing short functional text at the eleventh grade students of MAN 1 Laung

Tuhup . On Data validity stage was used Credibility, Transferability, Dependability, and

Conformability test.

The study result showed that: 1). the teacher readiness consisted of preparing the lesson

plan, material and the text. 2). The teaching procedure is Three Phase Technique, such as Pre

Teaching, Whilst Teaching, and Post Teaching. The techniques were used on Pre-Teaching stage

were Brainstorming and Grouping, on Whilst Teaching stage used Read aloud and write,

Demonstration, and Drill, on Post Teaching used Wrap-Up. 3). The media were used during

teaching of writing short functional text consisted of Handout, picture, Realia media, paper, and

magazine. 4). The evaluation on students’ ability in writing using Product Assessment approach

and Scoring guide. 5). The language teaching quality which applied by the teacher based on the

observation checklist from H.D Brown resulted Good Enough Language Teaching Quality level.

Keyword: Teaching, Procedure, Technique, and Evaluation.

viii

PENGAJARAN MENULIS TEKS FUNGSIONAL PENDEK PADA KELAS SEBELAS

SEBELAS DI MADRASAH ALIYAH NEGERI 1 LAUNG TUHUP

ABSTRAK

Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris dengan Menulis yang menjadi skill yang diajarkan

menjadikan pembelajaran writing menjadi tantangan tersendiri bagi guru yang bersangkutan.

Oleh karena itu, penulis telah mengadakan penelitian pada pengajaran Menulis short functional

text yang menjadi materi hampir pada semua kelas terutama kelas sebelas sekolah menengah

atas. Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskripsi pengajaran menulis dari guru yang mengajar

menulis short functional text. Permasalahan penelitian ini berkisar pada 1). Bagaimana Kesiapan

guru sebelum mengajar menulis short functional text? 2). Bagaimana prosedur pengajaran

menulis short functional text pada konteks Pre-Teaching, Whilst Teaching dan Post Teaching?

3). Media apa yang dipergunakan pada pengajaran short functional text? 4). Bagaimana evaluasi

terhadap hasil penulisan siswa dalam menulis short functional text? dan 5). Bagaimana Kualitas

Pengajaran Bahasa (The Language Teaching Quality) pada pengajaran short functional text pada

siswa kelas sebelas di Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Laung Tuhup?.

Jenis penelitian adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Artinya data

yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini berasal dari instrumen seperti Observasi (Observation

Guideline dan Observation Checklist), Wawancara, Dokumentasi dan Catatan Lapangan (Field

Note). Sampel pada penelitian ini diambil dengan jenis Purposive Sample yaitu guru Bahasa

Inggris yang mengajar penulisan Short Functional Text siswa kelas sebelas MAN 1 Laung

Tuhup. Pada tahap pengabsahan data digunakan credibility, transferability, dependability, dan

confirmability.

Hasil penelitian menunjukan: 1). Kesiapan guru sebelum mengajar menulis adalah

mempersiapkan RPP, bahan ajar, dan text yang diajarkan. 2). Prosedur yang digunakan adalah

Three Phase Technique, yaitu Pre-Teaching, Whilst Teaching, dan Post Teaching. Pada tahap

Pre-Teaching teknik yang digunakan adalah Brainstorming dan Grouping, Whilst Teaching

menggunakan Membaca Nyaring dan Tulis, Demonstrasi, dan Latihan. Dan pada Post Teaching

teknik yang digunakan adalah Wrap-Up. 3). Media yang digunakan selama pengajaran menulis

teks pendek adalah Handout, Gambar, Realia Media, Kertas, dan Majalah. 4). Evaluasi terhadap

kemampuan menulis siswa menggunakan pendekatan Evaluasi Produk dan Scoring guide. 5).

Berdasarkan observation checklist H.D Brown, kualitas pengajaran bahasa Inggris yang

diterapkan oleh guru yang bersangkutan berada pada tingkat kualitas pengajaran bahasa yang

cukup bagus.

Kata Kunci : Pengajaran, Prosedur, Teknik, dan Evaluasi.

ix

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First of all, the writer gives high grateful for Allah SWT. The writer would like to

give her greatest grateful to:

1. Dr. Ibnu Elmi A.S. Pelu, S.H., M.H., as the Director of STAIN Palangka Raya for his

direction and permission of conducting this thesis;

2. Triwid S.N, M.Pd. as the Chair of the Department of Education for her permission so

that the writer can accomplish the requirements for composing this thesis.

3. Santi Erliana, M.Pd, as the Coordinator of the English Education Study Program for

her permission so that the writer can accomplish the requirements for composing this

thesis.

4. Sabarun. M.Pd, as the first advisor for the guidance, encouragement, and suggestions

during composing this thesis. He is also the writer’s Academic Advisor that always

provides his time until the writer could finish his study.

5. M.Zaini Miftah.M.Pd, as the second advisor, for the guidance, suggestion, challenge,

and time so that the writer could finish the study.

6. Halimah, M.Pd as the inspiration, you are the only one that gives me revelation on

learning English.

7. Nurul Wahdah, M.Pd as the Arabic lecture and the Chief of Language Development

who help me in many things during the study.

8. Drs. Lahmudin as the headmaster of MAN 1 Laung Tuhup who gives me permission

and direction to conduct study on the school.

x

9. Radiansyah.S.Pd as the English Teacher of MAN 1 Laung Tuhup. He provides his

time, source and effort for the writer during the study so that the study could be

finished.

10. All of the teacher in MAN 1 Laung Tuhup who treats the writer like family, so the

writer feels like in home during the study was conducted till finished.

11. Nature and Social students of MAN 1 Laung Tuhup in academic year 2013/2014 for

their helping to finish this study.

12. All teaching staffs of the English Study Program for their valuable knowledge.

Furthermore, the writer also expresses his thanks for beloved Mother and Father,

all family and all friends who always giving support, pray and suggest in accomplishing

this study. The last special thanks to his friends of TBI 2008 for their support.

The writer realized that the study is still far from the perfect, therefore some

constructive critical and suggestions are welcomed. Finally, may Allah always bless us.


Randi Azwar Gulana

SRN.080 112 0392

xi

DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICATION

In the name of Allah

I myself make declaration that this thesis entitles THE TEACHING OF

WRITING SHORT FUNCTIONAL TEXT AT THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS

OF MAN 1 LAUNG TUHUP is truly my own writing. If it is not my own writing so, it

is given a citation and shown in the list of references.

If my own declaration is not right in this thesis one day so, I am ready to be given

academic sanction namely, the cancellation of the degree of this thesis.


My Own Declaration

RANDI AZWAR GULANA

SRN.0801120392

xii

Dedication

This thesis is dedicated to some special people as follows:

My beloved Parents ( Supriadi and Siti Zubaidah ) for their biggest pray, affections, love and care that always accompany my life.

My Uncle Muhajirin and Mariadi,S.E, who always give support, affection and pray till this thesis finished.

My Brothers and Sisters, Hendra Minata, Gazali Rahman, Rudi S, and Emilia M. for their sincere support, pray, and motivation.

My Little brothers and sisters, M.Ikbal, M.Hakim Sanjaya, Windia S.A.L, Rantika A.S that give me motivation and support.

My beloved ones Siti Raudah and M.Farezky.A, who stand beside me with uncountable support and pray.

My Advisors, Mr.Sabarun.M.Pd, and M.Zaini Miftah.M.Pd with their guidance, advise, encouragement, and time during this study.

The headmaster and all the teachers of MAN 1 Laung Tuhup with their support and help during this study to be like in home.

All the students of MAN 1 Laung Tuhup, especially the Nature and Social Class with their corporation and enthusiasm during this study.

My best friends such as Depi, Faizal Rahman, Eka Puspita Sari, Nurul Arifin, and Purnama Sari with their valuable support and motivation during this

study. My best friends in TBI 2008, Fahrudin, Rahmat Nur Seto, A.Rajib, J.Anhar,

Aris Fatih, W.Amri K, Amirudin Assiddiqie, Saidi Rahman, Haris Padilah, M.Rezeky, Edi Saputra, Yusli, Herlina, Hervina, Anis, Rabiatul.A, Siti Nurvia,

Indah, and Ani Fatridha All of my friends in the struggle TBI ’08 and big family of English Students.

I wish the best for all you and may Allah bless us.Amin

xiii

MOTTO

“Can he who was dead, to whom We gave life, and a light whereby he can walk amongst men, be like him who is in the depths of darkness, from which he never come out. Thus to those without faith their own deeds seem pleasing”. ( Q.S: Al-An’am:122 )

“Everything you chase and going to do are hard, but nothing is impossible

Set up you dream, do your best, and see how you will in the future be.” (Randi Azwar G).

xiv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

A. Background of Study ....................................................... 1

B. Problem of the Study ....................................................... 8

C. Objective of the Study ..................................................... 9

D. Significances of the Study ............................................... 9

E. Scope of the Study ........................................................... 10

F. Definition of Key Terms .................................................. 10

G. Theoretical Framework .................................................... 11

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

A. Related Study ................................................................... 13

B. The Nature of Writing ...................................................... 14

C. The Process of Writing .................................................... 16

1. Pre-Writing ................................................................ 16

a. Generating Ideas .................................................. 16

1) Listing ............................................................ 16

2) Brainstorming ................................................ 17

3) Free Writing ................................................... 17

4) WH-Question ................................................. 17

5) Clustering ....................................................... 17

b. Planning ............................................................... 17

2. Drafting ...................................................................... 18

3. Revising ..................................................................... 18

4. Editing ........................................................................ 18

5. Publishing .................................................................. 19

D. Planning Teaching Learning in English ........................... 19

1. Pre Planning ............................................................... 19

a. Activities .............................................................. 20

b. Skills .................................................................... 20

c. Language .............................................................. 21

d. Contents ............................................................... 21

2. Lesson Planning ......................................................... 21

3. The Lesson Plan Elements and Formats .................... 22

a. Goal ...................................................................... 22

b. Objectives ............................................................ 23

c. Materials and Equipments.................................... 23

d. Procedures ............................................................ 23

e. Evaluations ........................................................... 23

xv

f. Extra-Class Work ................................................. 24

4. Procedures in Teaching of Writing ............................ 24

E. Media and Materials in Teaching Writing ....................... 25

1. Authentic Listening/Viewing Materials ..................... 25

2. Authentic Visual Materials ........................................ 26

3. Authentic Printed Materials ....................................... 26

4. Realia Used in EFL/ESL Classroom.......................... 26

F. Teaching Writing at Madrasah Aliyah ............................. 27

G. The Problem in Teaching Writing ................................... 28

H. Short Functional Text ...................................................... 29

1. Kinds of Short Functional Text.................................. 29

a. Advertisement ...................................................... 29

b. Brochure ............................................................... 30

c. Tips ...................................................................... 31

2. Teaching How to Write Short Functional Text.......... 32

I. Writing Assessments ........................................................ 35

1. Process Assessment ................................................... 35

2. Product Assessment ................................................... 36

J. Good Language Teaching ................................................ 40

1. Technical Knowledge ................................................ 40

2. Pedagogical Skills ...................................................... 40

3. Interpersonal Skills .................................................... 41

4. Personal Qualities ...................................................... 42

K. Descriptive Research ....................................................... 42

1. The Nature of Research ............................................. 42

2. The Nature of Descriptive Research .......................... 43

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD

A. Research Type .................................................................. 46

B. Research Design............................................................... 46

C. Subject of the Study ......................................................... 47

D. Role of the Researcher ..................................................... 48

E. Research Site .................................................................... 49

F. Source of Data.................................................................. 49

1. Observation ................................................................ 50

2. Interview .................................................................... 50

3. Documentation ........................................................... 52

4. Field Note................................................................... 53

G. The Data Collection Procedures ...................................... 54

H. Data Validation ................................................................ 55

1. Credibility Test .......................................................... 55

a. Trianggulation ...................................................... 56

b. Membercheck ....................................................... 56

c. Peer Debriefing .................................................... 56

2. Transferbility Test ...................................................... 57

xvi

3. Dependability Test ..................................................... 57

4. Confirmability Test .................................................... 57

I. Data Analysis ................................................................... 57

CHAPTER IV RESULT OF STUDY AND DISCUSSION

A. Result of the Study ........................................................... 62

1. The Teacher’s Preparation in Teaching Writing

Short Functional Text at Eleventh Grade Students

of MAN 1 Laung Tuhup ............................................. 62

2. The Teaching Procedures in Teaching Writing

Short Functional Text at Eleventh Grade Students

of MAN 1 Laung Tuhup ............................................ 65

3. The Media in Teaching Writing Short Functional

Text at Eleventh Grade Students of MAN 1

Laung Tuhup .............................................................. 70

4. The Assessment on Students’ Writing of Short

Functional Text at the Eleventh Grade Students


5. The Language Teaching Quality in Teaching Writing

Short Functional Text at the Eleventh Grade Students


B. Discussion ........................................................................ 81

CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

A. Conclusion ........................................................................ 88

B. Suggestion ......................................................................... 90

REFERENCES

APPENDICES

xvii

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

4.1 Teacher’s Preparation on Teaching Writing………………. 65

4.2 Observation Schedule……………………………………... 67

4.3 The Teaching Writing Procedures………………………… 69

4.4 Media in Teaching Writing………………………………… 71

4.5 Assessment in Teaching Writing…………………………... 73

4.6 Scoring Guide……………………………………………… 74

4.7 The Nature Program Class Score…………………………. 75

4.8 The Social Program Class Score………………………….... 75

4.9 Observation Checklist Result on Science Class Program….. 77

4.10 Observation Checklist Result on Social Class Program….... 79

4.11 Scoring Conversion ……………………………………….. 81

xviii

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page

3.1 Data Analysis Miles and Huberman Model……………………... 63

4.1 English Schedule………………………………………………… 66

xix

LIST OF ABREVATIONS AND SYMBOL

MAN is Madrasah Aliyah Negeri

EFL is English as Foreign Language

ESL is English as Second Language

BSNP is Badan Standar Nasional Pusat

KKM is Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal

5W+1H is What, Who, Where, When, Why, and How

OCs is Observer Comments

xx

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix Page

1. The Schedule of Study

2. The Study Guideline

94

3. Research Instrument for Data Collection

a. Interview Transcript

b. Observation Result

c. Observation Checklist Result

d. Documentation

e. Field Note

103

105

112

116

120

4. The Score of Students 118

5. Syllabus and Lesson Plan

6. Letters

7. Curriculum Vitae 126

xxi

REFERENCES

Apriana, Hasnawati “The Students’ Difficulties in Writing Short Functional Text Based on KTSP

Curriculum at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Muhamadiyah 1 of Palangka Raya”,

Thesis, STAIN Palangka Raya: Palangka Raya, 2009.

Arikunto,Suarsimi, Management Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Jakarta:Rineka Cipta,

2003.

Ary, Donald, Lucy Chaesar J, Chris Sorensen, and Asghar Razavieh, Introduction to Research in

Education. Eighth Edition, USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010.

Brown, Douglas.H, Teaching by Principle an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy.

Second Edition, White Plains, New York: Longman, 2001.

Daymone, Christine and Immy Halloway, Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relation and

Marketing Communication. Yogyakarta: Bentang, 2008.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Kurikulum KTSP, Standar Kompetensi. Jakarta: BSNP, 2006.

Dody, Ahmad, Ahmad Sugeng, and Effendy, Developing English Competencies for Senior High

School Grade XI. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2009.

Dulay, Heidi, Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.

Fauziati, Endang, Teaching of English as Foreign Language. Surakarta: Muhamadiyah

University Press, 2002.

Gebhard,Jerry .G, Teaching English as Foreign or Second Language. United States of America:

The University of Michigan Press, 2000.

Goodwyn, Andrew and Jane Branson, Teaching English, New York: Routledgefalmer, 2005.

Harmer, Jeremy, The Practice of English Language Teaching.Third Edition, London:Longman,

1998,

Hornby, AS, Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Fifth Edition, Oxford: Oxford


Houston, Deby, Selecting Media for Diversing Classroom. Florida:Florida Education Department, 2002.

xxii

Hyland, Ken, Second Language Writing. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Istiqamah, Anis, et.al, 2011. Short Functional Text, School Paper

http://ayosinausinau.blogspot.com/short-functional-text.html(on line on March17th,

2012).

Kamehameha School, “The Writing Process: an Overview of Research on Teaching Writing as a

Process”. Honolulu: Research and Evaluation of Department of Kamehameha School,

2007.

McDougal, Holt, Alternative Assessment HandbookI. Third Edition, Washington DC:

Holt,Rinehart,& Winston, 2002.

Moelong, Lexy.J,Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2004.

Rahardjo, Mudjia Pengantar Penelitian Bahasa. Malang: Cendekia Paramulya, 2002.

Oshima, Alice and Ann Hogue, Introduction to Academic Writing. Third Edition, White Plains,

New York: Longman Pearson Education Inc, 2007.

Qadir, Abdul, Metodologi Riset Kualitatif. Palangka Raya: t.hp, 1999.

Richards,Jack.C(ed), Currriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge


Richards,Jack.C and Richard Schmidt, Dictionary of language Teaching and Applied Linguistics,

Third Edition, London: Longman Pearson Education, 2002.

Santyasari, Armi, Improving the Students Ability in Writing Short Functional Texts through

Inside – Outside Circle Technique, Unpublished Thesis, Universitas Negeri Semarang,

Semarang, 2011.

Siahaan, Sanggam and Kisno Shinoda, Generic Text Structure. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2008.

Smalley,L.Regina, Mary K.Ruetten, and Joann Rishel Kozyrev, Refining Composition Skills

Rhetoric and Grammar . Fifth Edition, USA: Heinle and Heinle Thomson Learning,

2001.

Sukmadinata,Nana Syaodih, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Eleventh edition, Bandung, Remaja

Rosdakarya, 2011.

http://ayosinausinau.blogspot.com/short-functional-text.html(on

xxiii

Widdowson, H.G, Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Williams, Carrie, Research Method : Journal of Economy and Bussiness, Vol.V.No.3, March

2007.

Yule,George, The Study of Language. Fourth Edition , Cambridge, New York: Cambridge


xxiv

CURRICULUM VITAE

Randi Azwar Gulana was born on December, 6th 1989 in Muara Laung II. It is a village in Laung Tuhup sub district, Murung Raya Regency, and Central Kalimantan. He is the third children of Mr. Supriadi and Mrs. Siti Zubaidah and has four brothers and

three sisters. He started his education on SDN 2-1 Muara Laung II and passed his

school on 2002. Then he continued his school at MTsN 1 Muara Laung and passed it on 2005. He continued his school at MAN 1 Laung Tuhup and graduated on 2008. In the same year he enrolled in English language program at the State Islamic College Palangka Raya. He has been interested in English since he was in Islamic Junior High school of Muara Laung. Besides love of English, his hobbies are sports (volley ball, football, and futsal), Reading, listening music, and fishing.

His expectations are to change paradigm that English is hard to learn and develop his place through English. Talking about dream, he intended to build English Study Centre at his village.

by randi azwar gulana srn. 0801120392digilib.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/344/1/abstract (ra).pdfsudah...

Documents