c9 a/rc lus 10.4) la y py apasifirroh af ^ a j_^.__^_ iq pjea ia heorqenej-rv^val^h^tuv qhd...
TRANSCRIPT
^RlGINAt
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Sf4Te or Ok1o,
pWnti-pf- /a pPellee
v.
pq^fd ^,or 5h;^,
^e^endanfgppe)lan^
^As0^? -15 7 5Qn /^p^ea^ ^urn^e C3yaho^a
County C^ovhf oF /^PpPalr,E jhf{ /^PPe110.te D,`str,'cf
Ca+/t-I- o-F flpPeu Is,Case No. cA-06-8d677
AEMORANDUM IN SUPPOR7 OF SURISDICTIQNOF APPELLANT DAUID ZIOltl 381E
DavII -zch Sh7e
4.4'183-604$oJAerh 0b,`o Gerrecti'ohw) Facrlity
Po. 6ox 45b9^^JGaS'Vi('e, Off °4569f -Oooj
covn/seL faR APpELI-J4rrr,zN Pkv s€
Wr`IlAaht J). Aason
coyal,cya C^unty resecutonCvyahog0. Cbunty Ss-it'ce CerrtercUUn"YS Tu"er, )A. F/oonlzoo o&^r,b s+
C)evelQ"^, 9H 4yQ3
Covn/SEU Fo/L APPFGJ-E^
AUG 2 2 2007
CLERK OF COURTL. SUPREME COURT OF OHIL
TFFBLE OF CoNT4rrJT5-
Exp> W,q-Tfo4 9F WNy THIs FEj-oNy CRSt 5HoULD eEGRANTE-D LEAVE To APPtsAL /}MZ7 WHy TN(5 C64545^7 TS oX)E
OP: pUBLfC` 5n/T^2J^ST f1NJ 2:NVoLYESSv,S.STAnPT/A-CoN'S7-1TVT)Da/,4L. (? JESTIOA)S , . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. l
S T47PMWdT of^ Trt E C 4sE AND >=A(`TS . . . . .. . . . .. . . - - - . - - -. . 3
f1RSUmEA1T zAl SJPro,4T oF plCoPos)-r)on1S o1-- t.,¢k). 4+
r0 OS }'on O^a, r, 4 06dht Svbj'eCfiS a
de-Feyd"+ 'to .Dovble So(qrdy Wkh It i.nposes3nv1-GP1e Separata SevrfievlceS Ar Mvlt;/le ^8hv.^pt^onso^ fhe S"e o^'Pnse 1h.-T ffye Vvcrord does s/ofSuppor-t Weve Cloiy.yr;^*,d Sepane,-}e)y • - - . - • - - . -- - • - • - ^
v,oj-,osf nbn gf GakJ N'o, r^ 4 Caort wvsf eoip(o y aV easonab)ehess tes-f o dc Fenm,^e a//le-fGen 4 SevrteareCovtsr`rierrti Oa.ta(leylsar^-te) 9n6 CoSt- e9eft4'e ..._.... S'
propoS('*)oh oF LqW /-)- Coorfi eXveeas i+r sy-qlc,fory
0.v-}hortty a•nd vlofk-les doe prooesr by 1 nposiNg Cohseruh'3e
-rtHierres Ih Oases 161he0e. -1he Seo-F^ohs of' OIR.CC. 2929.1y qhd
'2 92941 do ho{ apply ..... ... . . . . ..... .. .
Phopas;hah o.P ^-0.u/ A/o. TJL-: Te Nefiroc,rtve 4ppl'c0.ti'oy o{
Statev. Fos7^r, 'ja a{fendens ^v^ A(rect appen/ ^r4a)(eny11h5
Consecoi'(3t Sehtenees^ viofa-res Doe Prrocess Ahd Sep0.ra-hOh
Propah'oh Of l.ar0 /Va, --"£" /I// de^jdaytS ^rr¢hied a v/e45erttt7(tfa,y Geaniv9 by Stq^e v^r{eh qre entt41e/ ^o Kde r/ovv e-eedlag vWNfi fvl( -kIlocv-fron H^'^c hfi5 . . . . _ . . ....
Nnopo,^itlon -^ Gaw No. .Jr[_ A JefeYld4l-Y i3eNtr'-HR'( jb
^^1e ef^CtrVe ass,itq 3!ce of' Cbuhs•el as 9aKnah-Peed by -J-lfe
S/xth f-^MeNd41e41 qt -^*e Vesevrteno7y y e^n, y ynqv^tee 6ySYafe d Affer .
L
7
IV
Y
Py apasifirrOh aF ^ a J_^.__^_ Iq pJea ia heorQeneJ-rv^Val^h^tuv qhd ^h'yter('9err+ rrr/heh TreW Ceuvrse4Cadses q de^cnd^t ^o eu^ter 4 fb.M-vqfly -Nse yp(eaby t^r`tGlY^ck4`wg eVlden^e 9^ fG2 C45e and a 9e-&dneI3 evr-ti+lek 7a R henr ^y an -tbC .2lqfifer fvl &P99e-seecqce lViv-rrbM ^o dithdnav hlrple._ y)hefr_the i ssue (')as vTo'F beevt aj^Fi'OM,ed ah wppe.. ^ . - . . . , - . - - ^
c9 A/rC LUS 10.4)
pO,aOF or- 5ERvJ cE , . . . ,
f}pPpu olX
3-4yeinen'f En{ry and Opfn;on o{ ¢(?e C^7abog0. Covhfy CAUrt p^^p^¢1Y(8/6/2007) •
la
fl
/"Pk, to-e,rye
EXe,^4N147-ioN pF ^l-Yr(U5F-4kA-'Y^^ SHodLD ^^ BQRrI^€D_^E-^4V^_ZAPYW /Mp _W)H Y TH ts Cft5E: Ts oA^- OF
su^sr^n^Ti^^. Cnil/S"T17dTl¢q/AL C)1^EST/ONS
Th/r ^ixsnt.^'L/arJlL 9f^errf J^hiSdi'rfrrQM ^u ^jear '/f /r Cu.se^ {eCAvse it
PHeseh-ts issr?es a^ C`owreht QvbG'C rpftfrES'r !% (/'e9AYdS fa cohsis ler^y, C^^1^ensura t^
C'oSfY ^S^itehc'h9^ ahd Ce^s-h'tu-I/ahq^ i3sueS 'f^i0.f 5%-M^'Iqnly q{^atiYJqt,iy vfi^r^
C^ses?
Xh re^qrds f'o CoHSi5leer^'j `^1-e ^iwerCbdVri'r l/iave ^o uyr`fbrvn fiSt foNel^rrcJ
GUhe ther q^ tq I ^ov h+ A /!s fi JqfiiSfly 7^ie jet?feYldy^ /^n `^/L ,rpl^r DF o.4 n^ 9zg, )I Ce^
5tuVes on ?Ws .qm be1h9 dovie d y /d 3ervo S-tn,*lqnd 4nd the Iey(S(KNnr rh H e? (30-
^7r's Cburt flooaed w;^h (qses an -Ae Fs^er V^MeJyrr^Fecfs,, svch -^s t/re case /efom -y4,sCoant poesCwt(y?ti Sfq-fek ,Iii(Mpre, L'qse 4/'v, 2poj-475.
I
C
av,d Z9ok 13 !•4). Ih,S oase ^s,eserr('s a peh{'ect eXqMple. aF fhr's J1no6lem u/heve
the /ppel%ht ln•eserr/ei hvnleraas'dMases to p,nove hiSSe7h°hce cras Unneasoyable
rxS be^v19 IhC'ohSiYten+ 0.0d f/700.A4Jeh5OrafE GNlfih 951. o-{^,fev^(L+hCe,3• c(ChoS3 'fhe ,_$•tqte 791,
SeXoa1 840rys•hee 1996, and yet 'fke E/'Sti^th ,pJsfirAet ^eYely oaha/uded 7'f,e Apep^^ryt
"^{'q/!r -A r stient PP de.yranS*Qt n)" thqt h`s seqtrv[oe h/9r ;yroatrJfn,t -//4 ,y^nr//9r
Ca,rea, 9horPn9 -Ihe is'sve ni' oolti(cvlsdrwt,'avr. .See l^r,'e ^n^,qo/L'//^nt (rz^ylzvo6)J R Ia z3;
EXhlb! 1s B-i =ok 3ovnhql En*ly And LJ^r'y,on (8/6/2oa7)) P7
gelause -fE,is Cburf hns heven set dm.un a uh,%pin -tes-t f abj'-erfilve/r, New'ew
'the )leqrohablene55 ot^ SenteheeY, '{{re •qppellant rle8ues-rs -HWs 0^,Jr'f ^"o 'tqke -1%e
Op/,rtvkjtiy fo dn So becavse '(he ;ssue s S-lparely (rerehfied herelv,, qvnd tlve /Yla;i,
Au-fy OT t^(S L`eor^ /J -to /J]e()vlfar^ "ung the <IrS'thl`CtS UY1deh /'1'. Y^Or^t'hV,
fjlumfhum OAs-fi105S Cb. (197z), l05 oSf: 1 at -x z4,36.
T ne^ards fia fihe ,`ssve a f dAob(e , eapandy ,h thrs oqse, jhe k,jt }h J76si^^fy
fn/IQd fU prnp?n/y re(1,eu/ fhe %SSue beOq)Se rtS rulrvi9 c!/'iS ^nJed Oh -the 4P fibe
0vnv,`c t,'oy, vW on -itte -Ao•rs oP ^t^ Ca.seJ tr,n-mq^,y -}-0 -1"hrr Oourr-'s rdGhy n
sjAfe V, CoVer eohr'o 2oo43, a f9 U, i^r- zd 6 55 71 aad- ;h r'o/^fi^oa o•F' FfderAl AP). Thp's
rrns brouyht qr resevrtevn(Vn9 r.aheh -rhe i ^uot Avnd /Irellqat oavwFi-red' oh/y trvo
'$epAra-re 0.C-FS) ul h,'ch -rhe aunt V ,Qppeal,r Jrv 670f" ^C,Wkl r^7 *e /+n,ri q^,peq^9l^dl^1^6P^
^4 tGrp reond Sevr#cvreiny Tah,roh,W (a'/9/zwb), P•52-s7
1^3 herefone, 1for5 Dovrt ^Iyvlll ^ccr^! ftr%r c^A,c 71 eanne, 7{e proo&ddnr/
ctod f^chsre+dtJAV^( JhF;hm,'t,^s in fhe Sen^eye,hy ^hd Llaa^^^ti'oh o^^e
,f}(vef(avrl•.
z
STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS
OaSe ivtVrlveS -^aor ^denti`c^.( C^^YI't-s oF,Selcva) Qo^'1'("ery GUh^ch LJerG 'r(^e
reSUFf o-^` a^'artu0.11N -False pleA A,reemu^ ev^teNed ihto on +f/G/2oo5, ahd u/^^'c^
rectiv'ed o, ConSecv^r`ve 11^-^ear Sentehce an `f/Z7/29ay, o^' /,^/h^c^i ^^ f}ppel/avlf
ti,we(y mpPea^td oh l^//zoo5 fj^e Eyh}l,,]7^f+nr'cf C'ourtaf`/9^peals.
Z^(^fs -^%`rsfmOP^lr ^'ie AppeUarf ra^sed ^rSSevrf^eHCe Waa drs^rnpnhfianqie
Uhder o.2.e, -q4z9. llf LE)(4), and v'o/aird 4ub(e,,jespardy and'f'Gie a.l/Ped nF'^'aNSe
NUIe oF o.2.c 29Nf.26 o^d Vi`o)afied fG,e neW rule r'h [3/Ake^y P. (20o0,
124 jCf. 253. a^d ^h(ed Fa chai^eHye h1s yv/lty Plea we to ihe-{^cflve C^inseJ.
Qn, S/Il/20o^, rrie Caunfio-F 4,oPea)5 Vaco,"ed his,SetifenCe.s' a,j-v'io/afi,j /7,--
L94,7,60 rDle as C'o.Kpelled by S7`q^e v. J941ker (ohra 2o0(,), P'(6,t/.P ;u `t?c• T& 0-vnf
W 4PPe0.1s - ouni Mas( o-F h6' a-Ificr S-eeenc/ny erronr f be Mort, cU(`-H, t4e exc6'20917
aF h,s dodb)e ,Jevpardy /a(Iled o^Fense ^.Jh 61 tl,e Cbvr^- ale+enH,4oed ^e 4^/,f4ued -4y+ hc•f
^-a(rJ'ng i+a1' fhe fij^,ql leve) knd btcµusc /;t pled, ri/^y4^ ffie Cyaryes
Qm 8/9/zvo6q weseyfevJc;H' ^iea^ih' ulqS Geldv and fhp 4jw1ell4ntY'msPd 7ge
dor7b(evpoPa^dy 1`s,sue, Cani(S-^eh0y, Cb~pnSUrra,-rion, 4Y/d 11ne affol10"Af6r7 a1"? ^s^*in,
.bc^ -Fhe THrAI Coor-f (v1/I®Sed 7(,e ,Sq.Gle Sehfeeive aLya'yv of' cr/l^v^ti -Hie f/PPe(/an^ ^c^y
afpea(ed agA('h or_ 8/3+/^Z006. F(e a(so -Fl-"ecL ta wl#h^ra u`hr's p/ea. .
Tn `Ae APFe(lvn6- SeCo/yd apQeql Pe, .,9alrn rc2r5ed dovbJe,jeol/laNdy haviz9
cut^ed. hir prev'ous Pnoceduvod de-Puvffv cl4d ^50.,'v r0.s'3ed h)`s senteHCE cdas
^t^^na^a^t'otiate qvld 01xo chalie^ged hoW /os7hr Ul^s uPPhed %n Yo/qtoK 04 Gve
Qrocess, qnd f{ af jje t^as 3lot a^Forded the ^I (oCvton h yh /s ^/ ojfe j^nd itef
(7e Wqr vla¢ 9JVen e-FArFI3e CaenSel V^eJr/lt^^ryy ,h Ah r0va/vr)tany aNL CA71'hff(1f9eytl/aP.
3
Oh 2/6/2o07') rkc Eiy1,fA P> rthEf thS t^ aF^irmed ^e Se^phc^
aind 4p,oell4nt Aere^'ore fM21y alQfeAls fA '(U5 Oun^' rJY'e5evPYing $6CVi ^7)
ps^oPas/t,o^s oF IqW -(`er qtre(Jf-ahoe bj ^-G,rs hr`ylneS-l' oovrt.
AR6UMENT IN SUPPORT OF PROPOS1710NSOF LAY3
Propo,s;-filovi v-f' laW Mo. Z: fJ- Court 500ec*fs -t-
je-(^ne)ar^fi fo ^o^bJeLT^o^ardy /,(/hen it in/Jr3seS A9rl(-f^'pfe
5epas^afe -^ mtevlce5 -AH Av(fi^le G^ont,,ietians o-f' f%e
Sa.we ofFense -M0.t -fhe NeloNd [loeS d^of 5vaparf
WCre- 0011147i'f^ .Sepa)"a,-(Oy
Ttie. -FAC+s ih ¢tie r-eeovd do not ql(eye or Suppvrfi ^^ covhfs /,v ^J(ed
y^^lty tQ Hlere ^'o^rlMr'^J Separa-Fely or^ dr^fe^'ehilyi ^^ftieh eqeh (buvrh ^s
Vdir1 r'n9^r`rhq6)e oV7 -Nelir 4kce, aMJ relr'eS on I he- Sa re `{qc{s oy' c9ndue/I nyJQ
^ere Fore vt?da- -f^e dDvble jjeopo.ndy rraV"5roh o-FAe RF-A /{„yewdmeKtaE'-Me !/u'W
5fo+es LanSld3vfan arad O,k.P. 25y(, ZSi ffe -Ppv1 Q'06rls N/qy k7a-f 6e ^vn (.rles
,5epqrq,tel3, even i^,ovjk ^e pled 9v,lty 7o 76ie41. SAf P. Co'o^er (o{„a 2ooq),
819 N,E.2d ^574 Wj ^rekr^ v. ^ti%o (1g7-7)) 975,[7' 2 27-1^ U.5 S Y. 2^"oce
(1989), )o9s;cf, 757 'An ^arf S1^ov/d qccep^ -A,`s ease f 1;^ddrf`y
Ws 6evrterxe -fA -fGrA+ LUI,i eh dovble jeopQrd y fer.y,'.rr Ah %/s C7"se.
`F
^r^paslfjoh o-F' L.>w A/o. IL: A C^dnt
Mvst ^mploy q reQSOyobJehess ^esf 10
^eferMimo cJhef4er ^ Sev,fph^ r`Y
ConSrs'^eh-f^ Oo.GI^/lenSUrv^te, ^hd CaS^ -
^`^i"2^
The tr'a( Qurrfs A,rIe rejulred fa r^osauably caicV)a^e a SfhfMce
-tkwfi ^s CanslsdtErrf" and CaN)MeoSvNafp, a1n4 doeshM} lr»Pore OEo uvlnecessary loonde„
ov1 yoVerwMeni" resAdroes, /Ai, o,R.c ayz9-r( (g) and ?9z9, 13 (^)• S7`afe y^/a^ s
(Ofni'o 2oo6), M RJ, E. a.d I qt P.
The covrfi 6-1' appea(s shauld r.yp(oy a{^earaha6(ebpss fe5f f hevr^vJ Q
Covnf`s C'aa/P)i9n0e G3i-fr O,R.O. 2,g 19.N (e^ Ahd 2929,13 «. Ur 3. ^^keti
(2005), J 25 $.O{; 738 -t 765-762 T,`s -Fest sbould (e de Vlovo undea 29S^Oz°^6X'
BeCavSe Ihe ,D%str;cf -(')yed f e.np/ay c^vly feS(' o.t 11/1 or ereh
ohitcA{r'3ely Nule. (,(1^yt -fYleSfnvldand js fo ^Q,yvhStna'fe a^ Ser^fphce ir uhnenJ^Nable,
iu^cons'stevit^ qv)d vrtcann^e^sura-te, -}^^s ^pu^fi stio^/d accept fih^'s case fi cdel k
^e evr'dence mnd ^-e-F ^rfti o S+ahdqrd bUrde^ f^ N/ee^ a^id. phAV^`de de 4/^^9i'euew
^NA^psrfion o-F 4sJ Nb. 1IC: 4 enorf exceeds
!tS SfqfUtor?y qUfhoni'•N7 44d oiola'fe3 due phAOeJs
by uy/10SAt9 conTecJ-fi'3e Sehfieyees %n Cases WheNe
il,e SeclioirS DCl oa,o, Z9z9.),+ ahC 2y2g.Y/ d^ no t
aPp)y
5
Wheh fhls C`oor-t sevcred qhd exofsed Oh o(S Cahse0lf`3e Seytehne
51'^I1'dfe 940, 2929.14'CESC4)) S-f-^t-tvtory aulh<N1-fy vle Jao)eh exrsrr fo enqble -tiae fir^1
C'aVntS 'T9 I%woSe V1oh-MY(d<IaYty ce^rs^l^ Seuie^oes ^oM /hUH !/e o^n7e^ S^y^ ^
^ster (os^io 206 ), ff`f6 .Y,E, 2d 47a.
,i/ecaVSe oF-th's j.diotal Sur`jeryj O.R.(. 51^frzo! ^^s iirtt^d`AYeJy C^tlfed ^i?1a
e4ec4t MRna^'te 'J^e Anvef(qn}ls sen^ec,ces VidrJ co),eu%renti becqvse a,Q,C ;z9z9•jY
and 2929,^+1 v1o loy^eh q^f/,Ps ta ^^pellanfr Ccre.
Tevle.p"e, -fhe 7m(a! CbVrt exceeded i^s a^th^w4y Iti i npas,'r, flye senlthres qnd
Far'/ed fi-F'aJJorQ '("&e dlreci-i3e of fb ^ Ca^rf fo qop(y qrf rtqfiUles I/r/qAAC/ef by J'^ie
eXC, temeMFS oF/uJT^'%i and 1'f7ere-f-ore "^{•IC fnrqf O3nf Vioq"J-ed dve pnacesJ.
at ^99_; px Ptfe Lunye C1;^735 ^ os /b3 ^rf /YY/
Tke Y',-,/pC-f4 lkis C(4,^, vy Ili! 4F 2Pii" %Nfehpf^Pt4foA1
®F Fo3fer '1^q-t a,R.( 29zq. /`f (P) (4) wAr viat exolsed ia lts erf i,rety. ,7,-v+xaa/ Z471-hy
ahd pp;N `AV7j P 5, L. #0c!/e3e^^ Off;W 45fn1'c'FJ" 1"PqcC Jof7`Ph QS 'fh"5 CovVl'it
deF 3j`+^fy hod.'r^g eXl4`red 292Y f'Y 4^EJ ci^ "vr ;+r e^ t Ne+y^ ahd fiyio C^DUrt cv9T
Clear !n 54ah'n9 i-t A- .Sa ro T s-ten Zd, at r9 ^
henelone, tGnCrC6w( 5hodl^Clanlfy -{'!glf l-ar*r hr4xty oyd del'/96'e
IAR.^, or app(<'es oi\ v)oT,
fih0®o1i`tro% a-F 4a^rJ /Ni^ -m' T, ^etro^Orl^e
applr'car,6n aP s-/^}e^ FV*r -To crRGe^ers orl
5ty^ v, /y.J,n,$yo3/ Coh/o 'O/I sP,Yt J 2ao6-4hio-4n59 at 7(27^, sfq+ ri Z/oyd
C^hio APp. !1 A's-O, 20o7-ohla -3a/3 •K+ 7r yo, 4z SYq)^p v, T nry (ohio 9Pe !Z Dis^J;?-a07-0)7io-/096 at yf2
6^
d;nec`f apPe°( ChR(Jen9rn9 ^l5erut 3e .Sen-fmoes,
Violate3 ,1^e b^roCess and SepArqfloh 9f f^wers
i'n or ")"4 4e o,#06++'P11 0-^ sf°:te v ^-o.rfer '^3 f'ilrca5eJ fGre A-Ppe)(ah+ had
019hf to a QreNm/J'fr3e CbhetJnhCYlt SeVftthC'e uhder o.k.n. 1-9Z9. ql (AJ q"d 2^19.W(rX,'y)
qvnd also hnd an ofpenl op' rgtit f en{orce -)%af ^r+rsvipfrr'oh Whch -fh+e Cbvnt
im0oxd ^4NSeevh've Sevrrenees, uhder o„2,c 2953•oz aqd 215-3, ogf o,)l W ctAW7
Were SetReheJ as?d, ekCt3ed bi /°s¢er, artd fLeJc hiy^fr Were fakm qa/ay ^,^j
Y`etroo,c°h've qPPl,'c4iovt v-Pfilie ileMedy r'n / osl+r, qhd '1'hus Ar3 dve pNaoes3 hr9A1r
bqve {xeh v^'ola-Fe^. .9,vJe v. C ty o/"'Ca/un5^hc 696f), E'+,SCf. 107; e^,ffirv.
^ucey (19^'5), /a5S<"-f. 230 at 9 3P-P3-9
The ^ybth Pi5tn6f- averholed -thls lIq M on -Ae ba5r's Vla Ve;5-ted er
5ubsfiarrt'nl rrgkts nieh2 -(-li fcch, lavh^^ y^fny ahd Op/cr bvr, p, ^• FvyI If 'fhe
Vre5umr,V`oh ->°or Coy,^urreht Scvr*,ices is Ylvf ,, Vrs-red or 5^br^lavrr$l v^^lrf
hrr ovpeu( o^ P*f -/-a ChqllevJgr his' <'o45cwYias ,5inhfevrBe5 U/95. and af oyy r0c,
/hQetiyy ^e Q4^ `e -tPst ioe,r 4o-r y7e,^u'Ne VeSfel on Sr/brh,erh,! ni^ht.r
///Bhp4l^F"'i W)-t+j C'oorf Y'ehJaYed' -Ae (eJ^Sf^"i'I'e qrfi-/^i'fy 'fnr (brySPCV^^^e
_SevlfevlCes on /nv}fip)e o-4reHSe5/ RrrdJ^^^Ql^9 /e9)slo^+d A ne.W.7ravt a{'poK/er--f
I.rJOose ^(^ey1 cbv^^Yr^y^y f^je ivlfe^T} a^ 5.^^^ ^ie 5e^rq1^'o^, v^'pou/ersPhhe,`6^eAXts 3rvhlal,
Thus ^ir Lburf^"havl^ adAvr,sr ^ere ssdes aNd ^4J^ ^,^.r/Pr Nemtdy,
AoPar'nbh QF ^^ ^/o. g: 4V ^Ie^eeldertts9 url'd
a neuv sevltev?M,^7j Jy eaN'r^y bg ..Sfi4fie v. ^os^er awe
e^+; rled fi q yle Novo ^roCeed h9 Ul '^Oll atl/oCCTtion r^Nrr
^
Ti„r ^lur+ deClqre^ -{l^af a YPmqnd `^r Y''e^SEVitevK'^^ry vh(er fo,Tfer W^s
v)ofa l,Mlted reAq0.n6, 6U}"9YakrFCj 0. Cb,vlple-re "dehova" ^eqn(^p u/hene fr.&/
C ovr`tj a he re C^tre-Fdlly h,ecansider fi^e case, ^3"tAfie v; s(oh do z oo b)
Y4b N. E Zd j ot S.
t6e( Iavit ^Ce' vivf' ey^ ^ y^lir's r6h-t ViaH d.d -ftie *W Nvri- hennr,AhT e.^{ ig
^^ C^+se`a-f a^; bl`f ^hS-tead ^ecl^,hed -fl^e f=ns/et^ Ne,t^and as livrlfPd ^n
Scqoej Aaid. -J^0.t li- War yv;rzg to do v7ofl,iti9 6(1{- irlcbrAra-t'-- -ffle. aniy,nAl .rhf6i4/9
Ihfbr^rbiq"lian aNd ne ^Se Sev^+^vx'er ^lvs CohstYk,'h^v19 `('^e o4^pell9vlt^s qh^/^'•iy
fia ^^licf af/awJ{e^ rry Ui01A1i^vt oF O R.C 2f29,19 (.9^(!S qvd Llvy,n¢l /lvle 32
See Se t^Pv
i
CaL,nsel CL^ ydaviavi¢eed Iy -t^'ie 51X4
-41V?etqdaste4lt w^ f6e v 2rewtr^c^`yg beavritiy
,9Ylaarw by State H, ^s7er
The C'ourk of 4ppe4iS Sfq-t'e5 '^e 4ppe{(4vttf5 C'iao`ms )ne odiside e NeOand,
brt •fhe 4urt oven(naked 'tyat fhe i4ppel(qvrl' heAreviced Ae arl-,'ons W G^'s oour^rel <wd
(^auJ Se u1HS ^ne1^d`ced ih fi6e rc5wlteoa'vtg 7aj4rvh'pij ewd dld qot b axe hrs C(aM er/
avty *aA•Yers aW-11te YVcvrd• See Serte^/^^Ny /nsrvirchi'pf Cou9/7oao : (p.53' L.ihe f^ ^2•
p•5k'L'w- 244 20V' P5^^L'we12^ / 5t• bhe I9 /9 -/6; 0, do; LHe z3-.25a, p,(o) : /.be 1-lo•
pG^; Ltie 23-25; D•671 the J),
-LF Oa3hsel Wovld Vlid-t hAbe qL+a fV)Cb1""1'evH,^j lpiere Ir q f^eaja^jqb/e 67
^ A/yeflquY Ov04 /IqVe /lneseMed Cmv1V^v''r qryu,r•ierm-^- -Pon 0.//7eAdced 3-cy4lEyl^.<,5
speo^ F`c^i^y ^re^ted I^ ^r^r,
^(nv^oaiYot^ o-P Lad /t/o, Y_I'L; 4
is v^e^lGered ,`hua(urr}qry •wd v^I^-Ye(6yeKi' Wh^n
^Ni'q^ C^v,r,se^ S^eUSeS a de/^v^lqv^Y 1'0 ^ifeV^ a
P^c'tvqily ^Ire p^^a by wllh^Ol^^, eu^ev^ ^f`
^17e Ccse ^ev^^ ^ de+^ehd^t^t is eyt ^(n^ f a he^hlhy
nh -fhe A1ler J'vl a P/^SehteyGe /v^o{{oy ^o y1r'^vm^
h;s prea GUhffle -fHe isSUe ha,r v?o-f (^1 qFF`"t'd
OV1 qPOeal
9
Whtn -ffir- 211 ,J7^stim'cr Vacrc-6e1 h,'s je^xtenre j t6e ,4pdej(nt ^i%d -. Motk, fo
M4hd+^a"1 hIS ^v11^ Q)e^v fiared o', the r'sJie he eYrf-evvl o. Ac'tvaXy -^d(se fj(pq
aUe ^o %^^ecir`de Assts^oo- oP CMhSv(, ah^ ^^ L.,)qvrt's iP be nv(ieved c-pti^sP/az
^"o -!"rq -the OAse Awd_ pev^qf -fbe -tnvf^ W-the Oure.
^rh;es /^eq canrN^rts vhqee ,yv,oNa^tlY as o®ntn^hy ia ^eThe ln t)
pf7ocess. /Ykarl^y v. U, s' 11965), ^9 ^^ I I(66; I^de u, (^/ {^^ti^ C! s69^ 7J ^z^ d9a"
Oen Jie 4aPtf(avlfts in,4l Oovry,ref hhokere4i Cps7fM4ofi ke fiaeE -Ae
y^niql C'avn-Y an^L 4e ^pper(qY,(- 4t 4e /Ileq 6eafk^y 7t>t fhe Pjea u/oL(d 6c 40i-d41
carneor avtd tiqe /^Sx wP^id av^f i^ r`^- ln^hf^n vt o-f /^a^arl^Sr p.Sr 6. 7"^
Awef(M?t Covfd No-Y d,:raerh "Me- `rhvth on qL,6vno,^ nf -0e^Oledtf 6c-"Co-e G^velre/
W 44e1k qli "}^fe evr4eh(L^ qnd -fo dcrf'G f(ie 3IP/^^(/^hf nel/ev) Y'ieU'ed 7'4,e kCLY/,Sq,/745
°,9qiv11-f vliM. W^'lE(n rT/^f(qh"^ 31^6Wed -)r^ evr^eh^j ,`^- W^r neue.^led ^e^'^r
o('je N^e sVppv^ *a (esr Sw,AVs eh-ir-le,r1 R41 th e hOpe1/w Ghteted y%/le9
he. dc'd- nnt uqJenJ-whlj 41d sG,erird de re(r'elled o-F<f
CaNcws(orr/
/9(7^e^^A(e V e 3reW 15 i`3/fevdQ{ 10 J'eh(/e caS C-IrhfIWbtj o^ C1^r1(/i'Ctr^i1S 9^
'rhK-t scv ^eyc^es ir)eet tG^ des,yh NCWhe+hevrrS of`Ae IqG/, bvt ^he ^fbi J7,ftr^t f
Pas6ed oK 4'v79 5OJ ^Md- Ni `s LWvlr 4ov(&' qftrn{- j-ye case fo ^o So ;h ov^(en ^o
C'onreC'k 'fhe Cbw$fi1'vtio*jj Cr^)oq Av16- 9nqv1"fi Y'elrcT 7zrP/h Jne ^o* a^ ^le
oppees,-Ian q laok a/' r^-,rPeCi'W Tk VI54oo o7nM e 1qv/ by ^lawoh
Cburts, pvd 6,110-V -l^e Jav, Pp R yk(eo^shess -to S^7l4e Qn lhlr 0,,.5e,
Ip
IvI negArds -% ^ s proPosr`trons of, kqW thnee 4r74 -PoUh, fi4e 4Rll40f
N^UeSt5 -}{^t'T coUm 0.CCe& jUrsb`C^^ov^ 0.riL hold 4 0.beyaviCL°, Pi-ald40 r'+5 du/.rloh
iri 5^10e v, t"'J41one'l Cqse No, 2oo7-'ty$ pr'eSen'f'^y "(r- -fhe oovv f ahd
rehder A kots,Iat m -tG,eSe. b^sed aq Jts jddgeMevtt /v) A/^lore.
RcS^ec^-Fufl y Sub^ -ffe 1^
Vavi'd -^7 o vi Sh%e
aL)NS,e-4 ^OR r4PP^GL1}.^(v /^! PRo 3^
P/OOF OF sKRVI C^
Z cer ^^j `fha^ a ^y a^fh^r /LkMoraviGd^ m S^P/^M ^^^'s^s^fati o^'
AA1^Pl^qvli ^^r`d rIC, u/q5 ^^m 6^ oP46^40y U•,C /YJ9/%75 010uv/1E/ 76r
f}^e 4^^ ^,/ f rn^ D, /GlnrgO, CUyqhop Covyfy p aSeavtQl^ Ca yqhqga T
, 3th Floav, 12 oo Dnfam r 5i , C fevPlaod, o(t 4+h'3, onCe"P/ Oavrr, )o^
W Zo /) 00-7.
Je,3;d ,bo shl e
(`oo415e^ 12i4 fIPPECGA4 )̂, Ixf11,4^0"fe-
il
AUG - 6 2007
Tourt of Ayprats of (94ioEIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINIONNo. 88677
STATE OF OHIO
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
vs.
DAVID ZION SHIE
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
JUDGMENT:AFFIRMED
Criminal Appeal from theCuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
Case No. CR-458959
BEFORE: Rocco, J., Sweeney, P.J., Stewart, J.
RELEASED: July 26, 2007
JOURNALIZED: AUG - 6 2007CA06088677 46888081
1 IIIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII Iilll IIIII IIIN IIIII Iill Ii1^`0L(1 b L^ 0 P,G0 3 19
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT
David H. BodikerState Public Defender
BY: Katherine A. SzudyAssistant State Public Defender8 East Long Street, llti' FloorColumbus, Ohio 43215
David Zion ShiePro SeInmate No. 483-604Southern Ohio Correctional InstitutionP.O. Box 45699Lucasville, Ohio 45699-0001
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE
William D. MasonCuyahoga County Prosecutor
BY: Mary McGrathAssistant Prosecuting AttorneyThe Justice Center, 8' Floor1200 Ontario StreetCleveland, Ohio 44113
CA06088677 46677678
1111111 mUI^ 1111111111 ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ IN 1111
FILED AND JOURNALIZEDPER APP. R. 22(E)
AUG 6 -2007ftAALD E. FUERST
CLERK OF'j#^COUT qF APPEALSSY--^ / DEP.
ANNpUNCEhIENT OF DECISIONPER APP.RRE
. C^'I'VZD^ 26(A)
JUL 2 6 2007GERALD E. PUERST
CLERK , . eRT OF APPEALS^ D!P
N.B. This entry is an announcement of the court's decision. See App.R. 22(B), 22(D)and 26(A); Loc.App.R. 22. This decision will be journalized and will become thejudgment and order of the court pursuant to App.R. 22(E) unless a motion forreconsideration with supporting brief, per App.R. 26(A), is filed within ten (10) days ofthe announcement of the court's decision. The time period for review by the SupremeCourt of Ohio shall begin to run upon the journalization of this court's announcementof decision by the clerk per App.R. 22(E). See, also, S.Ct. Prac.R. II, Section 2(A)(1).
4,0640 P00320
R 1 a
-1-
KENNETH A. ROCCO, J.:
Defendant-appellant, David Zion Shie, appeals from the court's imposition
of sentence on him after remand from this court. In his pro se brief, he urges
that (1) the court erred by failing to hold a complete new sentencing hearing;
(2) the court erred by failing to hold a complete hearing regarding his contention
that he was convicted and sentenced for allied offenses; (3) the court erred by
denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea; (4) he was deprived of the
effective assistance of counsel at the resentencing hearing; (5) the court erred by
convicting him of four separate offenses; (6) the court erred by imposing
consecutive sentences; (7) the sentence was not commensurate with the
seriousness of his offense and Was inconsistent with sentences imposed for
similar crimes by similar offenders; (8) the court's application of Foster violated
his right to due process; and (9) the sentence imposed places an unnecessary
burden on government resources. Through counsel, he also asserts that the
court erred by imposing non-minimum consecutive sentences, and the court had
no authority to impose consecutive sentences. We find no error in the
proceedings below and affirm the sentences imposed.
The procedural history of this case was described in our previous decision
in State v. Shie, Cuyahoga App. No. 86464, 2006-Ohio-2314. As relevant to this
appeal, we note that appellant pleaded guilty to four counts of sexual battery.
YI E^340 PQO 321
-2-
The remaining sixteen charges against him were dismissed. As part of his plea
agreement, appellant agreed to be classified as a sexual predator. Appellant was
originally sentenced to four years' imprisonment on each charge, to be served
consecutively, followed by five years of post-release control.
On appeal, this court affirmed appellant's convictions. This court further
determined that, by pleading guilty, appellant had waived his argument that
the offenses of which he was convicted were allied offenses of similar import.
However, this court held that the sentences were imposed on appellant under an
unconstitutional sentencing statute, and therefore vacated the sentences
imposed and remanded for a new sentencing hearing pursuant to the Ohio
Supreme Court's decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856.
On remand, appellant submitted three "re-sentencing memoranda" to the
court, as well as a motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The court conducted a
new sentencing hearing on August 9, 2006. At the hearing, appellant and his
counsel again argued that the offenses were allied offenses of similar import.
Appellant further argued that application of Foster was essentially an ex post
facto law and violated his due process rights. Finally, appellant argued that the
sentences previously imposed on him were not proportionate to the sentences
imposed for similar crimes by similar offenders. The court sentenced appellant
to four years' imprisonment on each count, to be served consecutively, followed
R0640 P,60322
t t u
- 3-
by five years' post-release control. The court explicitly found that these were not
allied offenses. The court further stated that it believed appellant presented a
high risk -of recidivism, because he committed these offenses while on parole
with respect to a rape conviction. In accordance with the plea agreement, the
court determined appellant was a sexual predator and advised him of his
reporting requirements. Finally, the court orally denied appellant's motion to
withdraw his guilty plea. Appellant now appeals from the judgment on re-
sentencing.
In his first assignment of error, appellant claims the court erred by failing
to conduct a complete new sentencing hearing. Appellant was given ample
opportunity to present his arguments in written memoranda and in oral
argument.' The court addressed appellant's arguments at length. While the
court did incorporate all of the evidence and arguments presented at the prior
hearing, there is no indication that the court prevented appellant from making
any arguments he wished to make. Therefore, we overrule the first assignment
of error.
'Indeed, although appellant had assigned counsel to represent him at thehearing, he insisted on arguing these issues himself, against his attorney'sadvice.
VOIJ6) 4 0 POO 323
-4-
Appellant's second and fifth assignments of error both argue that the
crimes of which he was convicted were allied offenses of similar import, so we
address them together. The second assignment of error claims the court erred
by failing to hold a hearing regarding appellant's argument that the offenses
were allied offenses of similar import. Appellant's fifth assignment of error
claims the court erred by imposing separate judgments of conviction on each of
the charges.
In the previous appeal in this matter, this court determined that appellant
had waived the argument that these crimes were allied offenses by pleading
guilty to four separate crimes. The trial court was bound by this ruling on
remand. See, e.g., Nolan v. Nolan (1984), 11-0hio St.3d 1. Accordingly, even if
there was a statutory obligation to hold a hearing on the issue of whether the
offenses are allied, that obligation did not apply here,. where the issue was
previously decided. Therefore, we overrule the second and fifth assigned errors.
Third, appellant asserts that the court erred by denying his motion to
withdraw his guilty plea. Once again, we must disagree. A trial court does not
have jurisdiction to entertain a motion to withdraw a guilty plea after the
.conviction has .been affirmed on appeal. State, ex rel. Special Prosecutors v.
Judges, Court of Common Pleas (1978), 55 Ohio St.2d 94, 97-98. Therefore, the
court did not err by denying appellant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
VR-"7 040 P.0+0324
-5-
The fourth assignment of error claims appellant was deprived of the
effective assistance of counsel at the resentencing hearing on remand. Appellant
argues that his attorney did not meet with him until fifteen minutes before the
resentencing hearing and was not prepared to go forward. This argument relies
on matters outside the record in this case, so we cannot address it in this direct
appeal. Appellant can present evidence of his attorney's claimed ineffectiveness
through a petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Cooperrider (1983), 4 Ohio
St.3d 226, 228.
In his sixth assignment of error (supplemented by counsel), appellant
contends that the court erred by imposing consecutive sentences. He argues
that, because the Supreme Court in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-
856, excised the statutory provision which authorized the court to impose
consecutive sentences, the court was required to make his sentences concurrent.
In support of this proposition, he cites R.C. 5145.01, which provides, in pertinent
part: "If a prisoner is sentenced for two or more separate felonies, the prisoner's
term of imprisonment shall run as a concurrent sentence, except if the
consecutive sentence provisions of sections 2929.14 and 2929.41 of the Revised
Code apply."
Appellant and his counsel misread the severance remedy applied by the
court in Foster. Foster does not excise R.C. 2929.14(E)(4) in its entirety. It only
4,9640 P:90325
-6-
severed the part of R.C. 2929.14(E)(4) which required judicial factfinding before
the court could impose consecutive sentences. Thus, "[a]fter the severance,
judicial factfinding is not required before imposition of consecutive prison
terms.°" Foster, at ¶ 99. Furthermore, "trial courts have full discretion to impose
a prison sentence within the statutory range and are no longer required to make
findings or give their reasons for imposing maximum, consecutive, or more than
the minimum sentences.°" Id. at ¶ 100. Therefore, we reject appellant's argument
that the court was required to impose concurrent sentences.
Appellant's seventh and ninth assignments of error raise related issues.
In his seventh assigned error, appellant argues that the sentence imposed was
not commensurate with the seriousness of his conduct and its impact on the
victim, and was not consistent with sentences imposed for similar crimes by
similar offenders. The ninth asserts that the sentence imposes an "unnecessary
burden on state or local government resources, contrary to O.R.C. 2929.13(A)."
"The overriding purposes of felony sentencing are to protect the public
from future crime by the offender and others and to punish the offender." R.C.
2929.11(A). The sentence must be reasonably calculated to achieve these
purposes, "commensurate with and not demeaning to the seriousness of the
offender's conduct and its impact upon the victim, and consistent with sentences
imposed for similar crimes committed by similar offenders." R.C. 2929.11(B).
Hl06140 P:90326
-7-
In imposing any. criminal sanction, the "sentence shall not impose an
unnecessary burden on state or local government resources." R.C. 2929.13(A).
By focusing on the ancillary conditions on sentencing, appellant's
argument misses the forest for the trees; the court's first duty is to impose a
sentence which will protect the public from future crime and punish the
offender. As the trial court noted, appellant presented a serious risk of
recidivism because these crimes were committed while he was on parole for a
prior rape offense. Furthermore, the victim was only 14 years old while
appellant was 31, and he had admittedly engaged in sexual conduct with her on
multiple occasions. The table that appellant attached to his first re-sentencing
memorandum provided an extensive list of cases which appellant believes to be
similar to his own, but it falls far short of demonstrating that the sentences
imposed were not commensurate with the sentences imposed for similar crimes
by similar offenders. Accordingly, we overrule the seventh and ninth
assignments of error.
Finally, in his eighth assignment of errar (as supplemented by counsel),
appellant contends that it is a violation of his due process rights to apply Foster's
severance remedy to delete the former statutory requirement that the court
must make certain findings before it may impose consecutive sentences. Foster
did not change the punishment that may be imposed on a defendant or allow the
vOlC^^40 P00327
-8-
court to impose a greater punishment than was allowed before. Courts could
impose consecutive sentences both before and after Foster. By removing both the
presumption in favor of concurrent sentences and the factfinding requirements
to impose consecutive sentences, Foster did not take away any vested right. See,
e.g., State v. Mallette, Cuyahoga App. No. 87984, 2007-Ohio-715, ¶45. Therefore,
Foster does not violate appellant's due process rights.
Appellant has moved this court to waive the assessment of costs. While
the trial court found appellant was indigent and appointed counsel to represent
him on appeal, "simply because a person is indigent for purposes of legal
representation does not mean he is indigent for purposes of paying fines or court
costs." Cleveland v. Tighe, Cuyahoga App. Nos. 81767 & 81795, 2003-Ohio-
1845, ¶ 14 n.4; State v. Powell (1992), 78 Ohio App.3d 784. Appellant has not
demonstrated why we should waive the assessment of costs pursuant to App. R.
24. Accordingly, the motion is denied.
Affirmed.
It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal..
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the
common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution. The defendant's
V0640 Y90328
-9-
conviction having been affirmed, any bail pending appeal is terminated. Case
remanded to the trial court for execution of sentence.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to
Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
KENNETH A. ROCCO, JUDGE
JAMES J. SWEENEY, P.J., andMELODY J. STEWART, J., CONCUR
4@640 P00329