capability maturity model. history 1986 - effort started by sei and mitre corporation assess...

38
Capability Capability Maturity Maturity Model Model

Upload: bonnie-cross

Post on 12-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

CapabilityCapabilityMaturityMaturityModelModel

Page 2: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE

Corporation assess capability of DoD contractors

First version published in 1991 has been reviewed by 100s of software professionals

closely related to TQM goal is customer satisfaction

not required that customer be "delighted"

Page 3: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

LevelsLevels

1. Initial

2. Repeatable

3. Defined

4. Managed

5. Optimizing

Page 4: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Level 1 : The Initial Level

ad hoc, sometimes chaotic

overcommitment leads to a series of crises

during a crisis, projects abandon plans

capability is characteristic of individuals, not the organization

when a good manager leaves, the success leaves with them

Page 5: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Level 2 : The Repeatable Level

planning based on experience with similar projects past successes can be repeated

policies for managing and implementation installed basic management controls track costs and schedules notice and deal with problems as they arise

Page 6: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Level 3 : The Defined Level

Standard Processes defined across the organization and used by all projects

standard set of roles, activities, quality tracking, etc each project uses a tailored version of this

standard process

Training Program is in place to ensure everyone has the skills required for their assigned role

Page 7: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Level 4 : The Managed Level

Quantitative Quality Goals for both Products and Processes

Organization-wide Process Database meaningful variations in process performance

can be distinguished from random noise actions are then taken to correct the situation

Products are of predictably high quality

Page 8: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Level 5 : The Optimizing Level

Organization has the means to identify weaknesses and strengthen the process proactively

teams analyze defects to determine cause, and disseminate lessons learned throughout the organization

major focus on eliminating waste (eg rework)

Page 9: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Defect preventionTechnology change managementProcess change management

Quantitative process managementSoftware Quality Management

Organization process focusOrganization process definitionTraining programIntegrated software managementSoftware product engineeringIntergroup coordinationPeer Reviews

Requirements managementSoftware project planningSoftware project tracking and oversightSoftware subcontract managementSoftware quality assuranceSoftware Configuration management

Key Process AreasKey Process Areasby maturity level

Page 10: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Don't skip levels

For example, collecting detailed data (level 4) is

meaningless unless the data is from projects that use a consistent process (level 3)

Page 11: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Level Comparison - People Level 1 - Initial

success depends on individual heroics fire fighting is the way of life

Level 2 - Repeatable people are trained and supported by management success depends on individuals

Level 3 - Defined people are trained for their role(s) groups work together

Levels 4 - Managed strong sense of teamwork in every project

Level 5 - Optimizing strong sense of teamwork across the organization everyone does process improvement

Page 12: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Level Comparison - Risk

Level 1 - Initial Just do it

Level 2 - Repeatable problems are recognized and corrected as they occur

Level 3 - Defined problems are anticipated and prevented, or impacts

minimized

Levels 4 and 5 sources of problems are understood and eliminated

Page 13: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Level Comparison - Measurement

Level 1 - Initial ad hoc data collection and analysis

Level 2 - Repeatable individual projects use planning data

Level 3 - Defined data collected for all processes data shared across projects

Levels 4 - Managed data standardized across the organization

Level 5 - Optimizing data used for process improvement

Page 14: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Some Fundamental Ideas

Process improvement is based on small steps, rather than revolutionary innovation.

CMM is not exhaustive or dictatorial.

CMM focuses on processes that are of value across the organization.

Page 15: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Benefits of using the model

helps forge a shared vision of purpose of process improvement within the organization

establishes common language for the software process

defines a set of priorities for attacking problems

supports measurement via reliable appraisals objective supports industry-wide comparisons

Page 16: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Risks of using the model

"All models are wrong; some models are useful."

Not a silver bullet.

Does not address all of the issues that are important for successful projects. For example

how to hire and retain good people expertise in the application domain

Page 17: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Obvious Question Alert…Obvious Question Alert…

Is CMM well-suited for everyone?

Page 18: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Criticisms of CMM CMM is well suited for bureaucratic organizations such as

government agencies and large corporations. Its formality is a hindrance to projects where time-to-market is

more important than quality.

No external body actually certifies a software development center as being CMM compliant. It is supposed to be an honest self-assessment.

Promotes process over substance. For example, emphasizing predictability over service provided to

end users.

en.wikipedia.com

Page 19: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Who uses CMM

75% of organizations are probably Level One. To get to Level Two, you must have control over

the requirements documents. Hence, shrink-wrap companies like Microsoft are Level One.

75% of Level Five organizations are in India.

Page 20: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

And now...And now...

Lots of details!!!!Lots of details!!!!

Page 21: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Definitions

Each of the five CMM levels is composed of key process areas

each key process area is organized into five sections called common features

common features contain key practices

Page 22: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Common FeaturesCommon Features

1. Commitment to Perform

2. Ability to Perform

3. Activities Performed

4. Measurement and Analysis

5. Verifying Implementation

Page 23: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Defect preventionTechnology change managementProcess change management

Quantitative process managementSoftware Quality Management

Organization process focusOrganization process definitionTraining programIntegrated software managementSoftware product engineeringIntergroup coordinationPeer Reviews

Requirements managementSoftware project planningSoftware project tracking and oversightSoftware subcontract managementSoftware quality assuranceSoftware Configuration management

Key Process AreasKey Process Areasby maturity level

Page 24: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Objectives of Key Process Areas Level Two

Requirements Management necessary to build software that will satisfy the customer

Software project planning reasonable plans of what to do and when

Software project tracking and oversight visibility into project's progress

Software subcontract management select and effectively manage subcontractors

Software quality assurance process and product are reviewed to create visibility into the process

Software Configuration management baselines and traceability

Page 25: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Objectives of Key Process Areas Level Three

Organization process focus coordinating and improving the organization's process

Organization process definition institutionalize process data, criteria, training, etc

Training program develop skills to perform roles

Integrated software management integrate development and management activities into a coherent software process

(followup to level 2 tracking) Software product engineering

describe technical activities (e.g. write the SRS, design, coding, etc) Intergroup coordination

the development teams talks with engineering, marketing, etc Peer Reviews

remove defects

Page 26: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Objectives of Key Process Areas Level Four

Quantitative process management notice when performance falls outside of expected bounds

Software Quality Management quality goals, supported by plans

Level Five Defect prevention

identify causes of defects and prevent them from recurring Technology change management

identify, evaluate, and integrate beneficial technologies Process change management

continuous process improvement

Page 27: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Defect preventionTechnology change managementProcess change management

Quantitative process managementSoftware Quality Management

Organization process focusOrganization process definitionTraining programIntegrated software managementSoftware product engineeringIntergroup coordinationPeer Reviews

Requirements management

Software project planningSoftware project tracking and oversightSoftware subcontract managementSoftware quality assuranceSoftware Configuration management

Key Process AreasKey Process Areasby maturity level

Page 28: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Software Project Planning Goals Goals

1. Software estimates are documented for use in planning and tracking the software project.

2. Software Project activities and commitments are planned and documented.

3. Affected groups and individuals agree to their commitments related to the software project.

Page 29: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Software Project Planning1. Commitment to Perform Commitment 1 -- A project software manager is

designated to be responsible for negotiating commitments and developing the project's software development plan.

Commitment 2 -- The project follows a written organizational policy for planning a software project.

Page 30: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

This policy typically specifies that:

1. The system requirements allocated to software are used as the basis for planning the software project.

2. The software project's commitments are negotiated between: the project manager, the project software manager, and the other software managers.

3. Involvement of other engineering groups in the software activities is negotiated with these groups and is documented.

4. Affected groups review the software project's: software size estimates, effort and cost estimates, schedules, and other commitments.

5. Senior management reviews all software project commitments made to individuals and groups external to the organization.

6. The project's software development plan is managed and controlled.

Page 31: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Software Project Planning2. Ability to Perform

Ability 1 -- A documented and approved statement of work exists for the software project.

Ability 2 -- Responsibilities for developing the software development plan are assigned.

Ability 3 -- Adequate resources and funding are provided for planning the software project.

Ability 4 -- The software managers, software engineers, and other individuals involved in the software project planning are trained in the software estimating and planning procedures applicable to their areas of responsibility.

Page 32: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

The statement of work covers: scope of the work, technical goals and objectives, identification of customers and end users, imposed standards, assigned responsibilities, cost and schedule constraints and goals, dependencies between the software project and other organizations, resource constraints and goals, and other constraints and goals for development and/or maintenance.

The statement of work is reviewed by: the project manager, the project software manager, the other software managers, and other affected groups.

The statement of work is managed and controlled.

Page 33: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Software Project Planning3. Activities Performed

Activity 1 -- The software engineering group participates on the project proposal team.Activity 2 -- Software project planning is initiated in the early stages of, and in parallel with, the overall project

planning.Activity 3 -- The software engineering group participates with other affected groups in the overall project

planning throughout the project's life.Activity 4 -- Software project commitments made to individuals and groups external to the organization are

reviewed with senior management according to a documented procedure.Activity 5 -- A software life cycle with predefined stages of manageable size is identified or defined.Activity 6 -- The project's software development plan is developed according to a documented procedure.Activity 7 -- The plan for the software project is documented.Activity 8 -- Software work products that are needed to establish and maintain control of the software project

are identified.Activity 9 -- Estimates for the size of the software work products (or changes to the size of software work

products) are derived according to a documented procedure.Activity 10 -- Estimates for the software project's effort and costs are derived according to a documented

procedure.Activity 11 -- Estimates for the project's critical computer resources are derived according to a documented

procedure.Activity 12 -- The project's software schedule is derived according to a documented procedure.Activity 13 -- The software risks associated with the cost, resource, schedule, and technical aspects of the

project are identified, assessed, and documented.Activity 14 -- Plans for the project's software engineering facilities and support tools are prepared.Activity 15 -- Software planning data are recorded.

Page 34: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Software Project Planning4. Measurement and Analysis

Measurement 1 -- Measurements are made and used to determine the status of the software planning activities.

Examples of measurements include: completions of milestones for the software project

planning activities compared to the plan; and work completed, effort expended, and funds

expended in the software project planning activities compared to the plan.

Page 35: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Software Project Planning5. Verifying Implementation

Verification 1 -- The activities for software project planning are reviewed with senior management on a periodic basis.

Verification 2 -- The activities for software project planning are reviewed with the project manager on both a periodic and event-driven basis.

Verification 3 -- The software quality assurance group reviews and/or audits the activities and work products for software project planning and reports the results.

Page 36: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Defect preventionTechnology change managementProcess change management

Quantitative process managementSoftware Quality Management

Organization process focusOrganization process definition

Training programIntegrated software managementSoftware product engineeringIntergroup coordinationPeer Reviews

Requirements managementSoftware project planningSoftware project tracking and oversightSoftware subcontract managementSoftware quality assuranceSoftware Configuration management

Key Process AreasKey Process Areasby maturity level

Page 37: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

Training Program3. Activities Performed

Activity 1 -- Each software project develops and maintains a training plan that specifies its training needs.

Activity 2 -- The organization's training plan is developed and revised according to a documented procedure.

Activity 3 -- The training for the organization is performed in accordance with the organization's training plan.

Activity 4 -- Training courses prepared at the organization level are developed and maintained according to organization standards.

Activity 5 -- A waiver procedure for required training is established and used to determine whether individuals already possess the knowledge and skills required to perform in their designated roles.

Activity 6 -- Records of training are maintained.

Page 38: Capability Maturity Model. History 1986 - Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in

The training plan covers:

1. The specific training needed within the organization and when it is needed.

2. The training that will be obtained from external sources and training that will be provided by the training group.

3. The funding and resources (including staff, tools, and facilities) needed to prepare and conduct or procure the training.

4. Standards for instructional materials used in training courses developed by the training group.

5. The schedule for developing and revising the training courses that will be developed by the training group.

6. The schedule for conducting the training, based on the projected need dates and the projected number of students.

7. The procedures for: selecting the individuals who will receive the training, registering and participating in the training, maintaining records of the training provided, and collecting, reviewing, and using training evaluations and other training feedback.