Case Study Group 3

Group members1 Mr. A.K.M Zakir Hossain Bhuiyan2 Mr. Jegannath Adhikari3 Mr. Rammani Duwadi4 Ms. Sochheary Chem5 Dr. Watana Pattanapongse6 Ms. Pimprapei Intaravitah7 Mr. Hailin Zheng

Background InformationTheory of ChangeEvaluation Questions Impact Evaluation DesignManagement StructureTimeline for IE

OUTLINE

A baseline survey indicates that up to 47% of children in China’s Guizhou province are infected with intestinal worms.

Background Information

Local health officials are slow in providing treatment interventions due to lack of right incentives

PROBLEM

1. Health education training

2. Financial subsidy

3. Incentive for doctors

INTERVENTIONS

Theory of Change

Input-Budget (Gov’t & WHO)-Doctors & Practitioner-Medical Equipments-Baseline data

Activities-Provide health education training programme to doctors/villagers-Allocate financial resource to implement the health education programme-Offer doctors a financial incentive to keep worms prevalence down

Theory of Change (Cont.)

Output-The increased number of the children participate in the health education programme

Outcome-Reduced the number of children infected with the intestinal worms -The increased awareness of the intestinal worms protections

Theory of Change (Cont.)

Impact-Improved hygienic conditions of the children

Have the parents and children’s knowledge changed?

Do villagers support the programme? Do the villagers’ awareness increased?

Are there other external factors affected the health programme intervention?

Evaluation Question

Survey design of infected children

Informing Analysis

Triangulation Feedback to beneficiaries

Impact Evaluation Design

Management Structure

Local Health Authority

Committee for Health Education Programme (local committee, CSO, ..)

Regional Health Authority Impact EvaluationQuality Assurance

External Evaluators

InternalEvaluators

Feedback Feedback

Head Financial Support & Incentive

Head Health Education & Campaign

6 to 9 months

Timeline for Impact Evaluation

Thank you…!