ceb buyer profiles
TRANSCRIPT
CEB Financial Services
28-July-2016
Know Your Buyer
Profiles of Financial Services Technology ShoppersWebinar17 November 2016
28-July-2016
A Framework for Member Conversations
The mission of CEB Inc. and its affiliates is to unlock the potential of organizations and leaders by advancing the science and practice of management. When we bring leaders together, it is crucial that our discussions neither restrict competition nor improperly share inside information. All other conversations are welcomed and encouraged.
Confidentiality and Intellectual Property
These materials have been prepared by CEB Inc. for the exclusive and individual use of our member companies. These materials contain valuable confidential and proprietary information belonging to CEB, and they may not be shared with any third party (including independent contractors and consultants) without the prior approval of CEB. CEB retains any and all intellectual property rights in these materials and requires retention of the copyright mark on all pages reproduced.
Legal Caveat
CEB Inc. is not able to guarantee the accuracy of the information or analysis contained in these materials. Furthermore, CEB is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or any other professional services. CEB specifically disclaims liability for any damages, claims, or losses that may arise from a) any errors or omissions in these materials, whether caused by CEB or its sources, or b) reliance upon any recommendation made by CEB.
3© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
ROADMAP FOR THE PRESENTATION
Roles in Buying
Decisions
Buyer Profiles
Decision Maker
Characteristics
Effective Tactics
4© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
A COMPLEX BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
“ Customers are canceling capital projects without notice.”
VP, High Tech Industry
“ Banks are now more analytical and thorough in who they want to partner with. Compared with 2005 they need to meet regulatory compliance
and investment scrutiny.”
EVP, Marketing Financial Services Software Industry
“ Customers are asking us to cut 10% off of existing contracts before we can even say hello.”
SVP Sales, North America Software Industry
“ There is a new level of self-service before engaging a sales rep. Online research, trial products, ratings and
reviews.”
VP, Marketing Software Industry
1. Decreased Capital Spending
3. Risk Aversion/ Consensus
2. Increased Price Pressure 4. Access to Information
Other Stakeholders
Peers
Sales Leaders
Seller Other Stakeholders
Customer
The Internet Industry
Insiders
Sales Conversation
ConsultantsRegulators
Manager
The Internet
Project # 16-5404
Catalog # TGEV165404PR
Year Range 2016
Source: CEB analysis.
5© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
A DIFFERENT KIND OF DECISION MAKINGDecision-Making Timeline
Needs Well-Scoped
Priorities Set
Requirements Mostly Defined
Providers Compared
Prices Benchmarked
Due Diligence
Begins
First Outreach to Provider or
Partner
Purchase Decision
Completed
57% Complete
Source: CEB analysis.
6© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
40% Executive
11% Contributor
49% Manager
35% Small
24% Large
41% Medium
67% North America
15% Europe
18% Asia-Pacific
METHODOLOGYProgram Area
Region
Firm Sizea
Role Title
43% Retail Banking
31% Wealth Management
25% Commercial Banking
n = 1,021.Source: CEB 2016 Financial Services Technology Survey.
n = 1,021.Source: CEB 2016 Financial Services Technology Survey.
n = 1,021.Source: CEB 2016 Financial Services Technology Survey.a Firm Size: Small = Less than $5 B; Medium = $5 B–$50 B;
Large = More than $50 B.
n = 1,021.Source: CEB 2016 Financial Services Technology Survey.
7© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
DECISION-MAKING TEAM SIZES VARYSize of Decision-Making Team
36% 1–3
18% More Than 10
19% 6–10
28% 4–5n = 1,021.Source: CEB 2016 Financial Services Technology Survey.
8© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
NUMBER OF DECISION MAKERS BY PROGRAM AREA
Retail Banking, 10 or more
Commercial Banking, 5
Wealth Management, 3
n = 1,021.Source: CEB 2016 Financial Services Technology Survey.
9© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
LARGER BUDGETS MEAN MORE DECISION MAKERSNumber of Decision Makers by Budget Size
Less Than $5 M
$20 M to Less Than $50 M
$5M to Less Than $20 M
More Than $50 M
1 to 4
5 or More
n = 1,021.Source: CEB 2016 Financial Services Technology Survey.
10© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
ROLES INVOLVED IN BUYING DECISIONS
n = 1,021.Source: CEB 2016 Financial Services Technology Survey.
FinanceLine of Business
IT Compliance and Risk Operations
53% 52%
46% 44% 33%
11© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
LIKELY DECISION MAKERS BY TEAM SIZE
Team of Five or More Decision Makers
Team of Three to Four Decision Makers
Team of One to Two Decision Makers
Finance
Finance
Finance
Line of Business
Line of Business
Line of Business
IT
IT
Compliance and Risk
Operations
12© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
ROADMAP FOR THE PRESENTATION
Roles in Buying
Decisions
Buyer Profiles
Decision Maker
Characteristics
Effective Tactics
13© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: LINE OF BUSINESS, STRATEGY
Mission
Responsible for stewardship of overarching mission and vision, target market definition, long-term financial plan, long-term strategic priorities, and annual corporate priorities. Lead strategy project execution such as analysis and recommendations related to emerging industry trends, expansion opportunities, competitive threats, and internal business performance improvement.
Skills and Competencies
■ Ability to identify and define business questions and issues
■ Develop strategic, analytical, and financial frameworks to conduct analysis
■ Creative, out-of-the-box thinker who is intellectually curious
■ Highly motivated and possess vision; exceptional ability and enthusiasm
■ Experience working within a consumer practice or with consumer products/retail clients
■ Ability to make decisions quickly and effectively influence others
■ MBADevelopment Goals
■ Prioritizing growth bets ■ Scenario planning ■ Defending growth bets ■ Identifying growth options ■ M&A decision making
Key Priorities
■ Work with executive, functional, and operating management to drive overall corporate, function, and business-specific strategies.
■ Lead industry and competitive analysis, issue prioritization, and solution development by working with a diverse group of associates.
■ Assess and drive new growth opportunities for company, with a focus on both organic (i.e., build) and inorganic (i.e., acquisition) opportunities.
■ In pursuing acquisitions, lead the entire M&A process through strategic development, target identification, valuation, diligence, and contract negotiations.
■ Focus on growth, profit enhancement, and operating effectiveness. ■ Work closely with line management, the director will better understand strategic imperatives and requirements, leading to appropriate strategic plans.
14© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: LINE OF BUSINESS, STRATEGYCommon Pitfalls Preventing Readiness-Based PrioritizationIllustrative
StrategistGoal
Pitfalls
Feasibility Stakeholder+
Executives fixate on risk downside, forcing strategy to focus on
market analysis
Limited direct experience prevents
true understanding of capability needs
Ability to prioritize investments is limited by absence of stakeholder
engagement
Over-Reliance on Market Risk Assessments
Underestimate Capability
Gaps
Inadequate Stakeholder Engagement
Market-Based Prioritization
Current Readiness-Based
Prioritization
Desired
Strategist’s Imperative
Risk ReadinessDemonstrate the
ability to mitigate the impact of market forces
Capability ReadinessValue opportunities based on certainty of execution, not by
market attractiveness
Stakeholder ReadinessPre-empt hidden resistance to new
investment priorities
Source: CEB analysis.
15© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: LINE OF BUSINESS, STRATEGY
Implications for Technology and Service Providers
■ In this complex business environment, a strategist’s goal cannot be implemented without stakeholder involvement. The LOB professional is not the only decision-maker to satisfy.
■ This role has the potential to be a strong advocate on behalf of your solution, if they can understand the benefits to growth, profit enhancement, and operating effectiveness.
■ As the LOB professional is concerned with corporate priorities, stress the regulatory advantages.
16© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: LINE OF BUSINESS, CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE
Mission
Charged with taking a 360-degree view of customer relationships and leading cross-functional efforts to ensure an engaged, knowledgeable, and active customer base. Develops business relationships that maximize lifetime customer value and minimize attrition, and systems that serve for fast, efficient, and value-adding interactions.
Skills and Competencies
■ Strategic and visionary thinker with experience driving cross-functional improvement programs
■ Ability to lead large programs that affect the company’s long-term goals
■ Tenacity and energy to drive change ■ Exercise independent judgment in methods, techniques, and evaluation criteria for obtaining results
■ Excellent presentation and communication skills with high level of business acumen
■ Experience in Customer Experience, Strategy Consulting, or Enterprise Project Management
■ Ability to make decisions quickly and effectively influence others
■ MBA
Development Goals
■ Providing a seamless experience across multiple customer service channels (i.e., Omni-channel) to better meet growing customer expectations
■ Consolidating multiple streams and increasing volumes of customer information to improve customer interactions and serve the customer
■ Planning for, integrating, and successfully executing technology transitions (e.g., customer relationship management; enterprise resource planning) to take advantage of technological advancements and deliver higher-quality service
Key Priorities
■ Create an authoritative view of the customer experience, by mapping the key touch points and need states for customers throughout the engagement process and create a common language and set of definitions.
■ Partner with finance, marketing, IT, BI/data science to establish dashboard that measures customer success at each step.
■ Real-time issue (such as complaints and outages) trending and tracking and response policies.
■ Unify the company around a common process for customer satisfaction surveys and “voice of the customer“ activity.
■ Institute a formal process for capturing, analyzing, and acting on customer feedback, including leveraging social media channels to better respond to customer needs/requests.
17© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: LINE OF BUSINESS, CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE
Summary Vendor Review ScorecardAttribute Score1. Strategic and Corporate Fit 5.0%
2. Engagement Governance Model 10.0%
3. Cost Benefits 50.0%
4. Technology 10.0%
5. Infrastructure 5.0%
6. Process Maturity 5.0%
7. Culture 5.0%
8. Customer Satisfaction 10.%
Implications for Technology and Service Providers
■ Customer Experience professionals see value in technological tools to achieve a 360-degree view of the customer.
■ Frame messaging to emphasize how information collected through banking solutions can be leveraged to better serve the customer.
18© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: FINANCE
Mission
To ensure professional and ethical financial practices and a cohesive finance service offering within a division that is aligned with business strategy and group finance strategy, so as to ensure the functionality and sustained profitability of the division.
Skills and Competencies
■ Exceptional analytical ability ■ Proven business leadership and acumen
■ Professionalism ■ Integrity ■ Accountability ■ Resilience ■ Problem solving skills ■ Results orientation ■ Ability to communicate effectively at all levels
■ Sound judgment and decision making skills
■ Chartered Accountant ■ MBA
Development Goals
Large Cap Companies ■ Strengthening finance team ■ Cutting costs across the enterprise ■ Implementing finance technology systems
■ Optimizing shared service centers
Middle Market ■ Driving the execution of firm strategy ■ Implementing finance technology systems
■ Increasing finance process efficiency ■ Organizing data to support decision making
Key Priorities
■ Direct and oversee all aspects of the Finance & Accounting functions of the division.
■ Manage and minimize the company’s financial risk exposure by developing and maintaining systems of internal controls, liaising with Corporate Internal Audit and Risk Management functions as appropriate.
■ Establish and maintain strong relationships with senior executives so as to identify their needs and seek a full range of business solutions, providing accurate and relevant advice.
■ Oversee and manage the process around legal contracts which the division enters into.
■ Formulate short and long-term strategic financial objectives for the division, in line with the overall business strategy of the division, as well as the overall financial strategy of the company.
■ Provide recommendations to strategically enhance financial performance and business opportunities.
19© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
Top Performance Metrics Tracked by Revenue BandPercentage of Controllers
n = 26.Source: CEB analysis.
Variance of Budgeted to Actual as a Percent of Budgeted
Cycle Time to Complete Reports
Percentage of Accounts Reconciled
Average Days to Pay Invoices
Functional Cost as a Percent of Revenue
Other
Accounts Payable Costs per Invoice
Number of Error Correction Entries as a Percent of Total Entries
Number of Accounts in Business Unit’s Chart of Accounts
Cycle Time to Prepare Budgets
Total Financial Budgeting and Analysis Department Cost as a Percent of Revenue
PROFILE: FINANCE
0% 50% 100%
82%63%60%
45%50%20%
36%38% 60%
45%38%20%
36% 63%0%0%
88%0%27%
50%0%18%
0% 20%0%
13% 40%9%13%0%
0%13%0%
$1 B–$5 B $5 B–$10 B $10 B–$25 B
20© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: FINANCE
Implications for Technology and Service Providers
■ Determine if there is budget pre-allocated for the project
■ Finance professionals are, above all, evaluated on their ability to keep budgets on track.
■ This decision-maker needs to see a strong ROI to sign-off.
■ Make it easy for finance professionals to understand the benefits by providing a compelling business case.
21© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: IT
Mission
To propose budgets for programs and projects, purchase and upgrade equipment, supervise computer specialists and IT workers, and preside over IT-related projects.
Skills and Competencies
■ Proven capability to use time, money, and human resources to deliver valued outcomes
■ Strong understanding of technical IT environments
■ Strong strategic thinking abilities ■ Service-oriented ■ Adaptable ■ Self-governing, self-motivated ■ Co-operative ■ Ability to negotiate to lead to desired outcomes
■ Ability to cope with many simultaneous projects/initiatives
■ Degree/post-grad degree in Business and/or ITDevelopment Goals
■ Aligning IT performance metrics with business outcomes ■ Driving better information quality and integration ■ Building a best-in-class, standardized risk assessment framework ■ Restructuring organizational models for infrastructure operations and service delivery
■ “Industrializing” infrastructure through automation, more effective processes, and metrics
■ Producing enterprise information management strategies and roadmaps
Key Priorities
■ Responsible for planning, directing, leading, and managing all Information Systems, Technology, and Communications (voice and data) services for all business entities.
■ Develop a governance framework to a degree that will allow Executives and Directors to satisfy themselves that all modern IT diligence standards are adhered to.
■ Provide strategic systems and technology leadership, including advisory to senior Executives.
■ Oversee and manage the process around legal contracts which the division enters into.
■ Consult with internal business unit management and staff to anticipate current and future information, systems, and technology requirements.
■ Develop and ensure the integrity of all data security, business continuity, and disaster recovery plans.
22© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: ITTop-Five IT Sourcing ChallengesPercentage of Respondents
n = 57.Source: CEB analysis.
0%
30%
60%
44%42%
54% 54%
33%
Defining a Sourcing Strategy
Establishing Vendor
Selection Criteria
Coordinating Multiple Vendors
Implementing Effective Vendor
Management
Monitoring Vendor Risks
Sourcing Strategy Sourcing Execution
23© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: IT
Implications for Technology and Service Providers
■ IT professionals have the expertise to evaluate the specifics of your tech. They expect detailed technical information on your solutions.
■ In sourcing, IT professionals struggle most with coordinating multiple vendors and effective vendor management. Emphasize the ways in which your solution can reduce burden on the IT department.
■ Overall business goals also concern IT professionals. Use this as a secondary messaging theme.
24© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: COMPLIANCE AND RISK
Mission
To develop and implement the corporate risk management framework to ensure that the Business Units have processes in place to identify, measure, monitor, mitigate, and report on risks and associated mitigation strategies consistent with this policy and corporate risk tolerances.
Skills and Competencies
■ Bring a ‘big picture’ perspective ■ Understand business issues ■ Ability to measure and compare risk and reward
■ Communicate risk issues to employees and corporate stakeholders
■ Technical risk management skills (i.e., risk measurement and modeling)
■ Ability to influence the Board on risk strategy
■ Strong background in finance
Development Goals
Prioritize Risks That Matter Most ■ Spend more time dealing with overarching strategic risks, rather than financial, operational, and compliance risks.
Cope with Flat Resource Pool ■ Find ways to improve productivity, reduce low-value activities, and rely on outside resources.
Improve GRC Tools ■ Move from Risk Assessment to Risk Management ■ Allocate more resources to risk monitoring and mitigation rather than risk identification and assessment.
■ Cybersecurity threats are a top concern
Key Priorities
■ Ability to influence the Board on risk strategy ■ Verifying and validating that Business Unit risk tolerances and limits have been established consistent with corporate direction.
■ Ensuring the company’s internal audit programs and practices are appropriately risk-based.
■ Independently overseeing and assessing risk management and mitigation programs within and routinely reporting to the CEO, CFO, and Board of Directors, material changes in the corporate risk profile, internal audit results, and policy, limit, and procedural exceptions.
■ Driving a culture of risk awareness and discipline.
25© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
0% 20% 40%
40%
23%
21%
16%
4%
PROFILE: COMPLIANCE AND RISKWhich of the Following Are Common Triggers for Concern or “Red Flags” During the Third-Party Risk Assessment Process?Please Select All That Apply
n = 53.Source: CEB analysis.
The Third Party Provides Conflicting Answers
Throughout the Assessment
It’s Clear Someone Unfamiliar with Specific Processes Asked About in
the Assessment Filled it Out
The Third Party Has Recently Garnered Poor Press or
Media Attention
The Third Party Takes Too Long to Fill Out the Assessment
Other
26© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: COMPLIANCE AND RISK
Implications for Technology and Service Providers
■ Compliance professionals are meticulous in their scrutiny of vendor partners, and are committed to overall corporate strategy.
■ Focus on any risk mitigating benefits of the technology.
■ Avoid the number one compliance red flag by providing consistent information throughout the assessment.
27© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: OPERATIONS
Mission
Plan, direct, and coordinate organizational operations. Responsible for ensuring and improving the performance, productivity, efficiency, and profitability of departmental and organizational operations through the provision of effective methods and strategies.
Skills and Competencies
■ Proven track record in driving change and delivering IT implementations
■ Ability to prioritize and adapt quickly to shifting priorities, demands, and timelines
■ Ability to challenge current processes and identify effective solutions
■ Demonstrated analytical mindset and innovative problem-solving capabilities
■ Excellent written and interpersonal communications skills
■ Good understanding of banking operations processes and products
■ Strong stakeholder management skills in the interactions with various internal business partners across different seniority levels
■ Experience in change and project management
Development Goals
Focus on the end customer ■ Building a truly customer-centric mindset with staff ■ Creating and sustaining a low-effort customer experience
Automation and digitization ■ Accelerating automation and straight-through processing initiatives ■ Integrating Operations and IT strategy to drive deeper “digitization” and efficiency
■ Securing investment to modernize/digitize capabilities
Key Priorities
■ Manage day-to-day operations of a service delivery platform with supervisory authority over multiple Team Leads.
■ Collaborate with others across multiple departments and lines of business. ■ Identify, implement, and oversee process improvements across departments. ■ Work directly with client peers and vendor management team to maximize the client relationship, identify or implement best practices, and ensure the timely resolution of issues as they relate to Operations Fulfillment.
■ Develop strategies in a fast-paced environment where new variables are constantly emerging.
■ Manage staffing and financial budgets.
28© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: OPERATIONSOperations’ Current and Planned Use of Each TechnologyPercentage of Respondents
n = 122.Source: CEB 2016 FS Agenda Poll.
Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.
0%
50%
100%
6%
29%
26%
16%
24%
19%
40%
13%
20%
8%
18%
28%
17%
23%
14%
24%
36%
15%
16%
9% Not Using and Have No Plans to Do So
Not Using but Exploring the Possibility
Have a Formalized Plan to Use in the Next 24 Months
Currently Piloting
Have Implemented the Technology
Predictive Analytics
Artificial Intelligence
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
Blockchain
29© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PROFILE: OPERATIONS
Implications for Technology and Service Providers
■ Highlight the benefits of technology expenditure as gains in customer experience and process efficiency.
■ Align messaging to operations professionals as collaborators and problem-solvers.
■ Operations professionals see value in emerging technologies, such as robotics, AI, and Blockchain.
30© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
ROADMAP FOR THE PRESENTATION
Roles in Buying
Decisions
Buyer Profiles
Decision Maker
Characteristics
Effective Tactics
31© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
DECISION MAKERS BY BUDGET SIZEDecision Maker Type by Team Size
n = 758.Source: CEB 2015 Financial Services Technology Brands Survey.
Like
liho
od
to
Be
Pre
sent
0%
35%
70%
Primary Decision Maker
Heavy Influencer
Slight Influencer
1 to 3 4 to 5 6 to 10 More Than 10
32© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
EASE OF SWITCHINGPrimary Decision Makers
Slight Influencers
Heavy Influencers
54% Easy
28% Neither Easy nor Difficult
20% Easy
50% Easy
23% Difficult
52% Difficult
25% Difficult
23% Neither Easy nor Difficult
25% Neither Easy nor Difficult
n = 758.Source: CEB 2016 Financial Services Technology Survey.
n = 758.Source: CEB 2016 Financial Services Technology Survey.
n = 758.Source: CEB 2016 Financial Services Technology Survey.
33© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PRIMARY DECISION MAKERSIn the Past, Recommended Supplier to Other Financial Institutions
n = 758.Source: CEB 2015 Financial Services Technology Brands Survey.
Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Agree to Recommended
Neither Disagree nor Agree to Neutral
Disagree to Did Not Recommend
0%
50%
100%
11%
30%
59%
12%
38%
51%
17%
43%
39%
Primary Decision Maker
Non-Primary Decision-Maker, but Influence
Decisions Heavily
Non-Primary Decision-Maker, but Influence
Decisions Slightly
34© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
PREFERRED SALES COLLATERAL
n = 758.Source: CEB 2015 Financial Services Technology Brands Survey.
49% 49% 61%
42% 38% 43%
37% 37% 36%
36% 33% 29%
34% 24% 26%
33% 31% 28%
30% 25% 22%
30% 19% 21%
28% 27% 24%
26% 17% 17%
24% 22% 23%
19% 13% 11% Slight Influencer
Heavy Influencer
Primary Decision Maker
Promotional Items (Gifts)
Customer Testimonials
Business Website
Software Trial Versions
Sample Business Cases
White Papers
Case Studies
Virtual Demonstration
Marketing Brochures
Data Sheets
Multimedia
Live Demonstration
35© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
Primary Decision Maker Heavy Influencer Slight Influencer
Tenure High Mid Low
Budget Sizea All Budgets Mid High or Low
Ease of Switching Easy Easy Difficult
Willingness to Pay Premium
Modest Premium or Market Price
High or Modest Premium
High or Modest Premium
Time Spent with Sales Rep in a Quarter
1 to 3 Hours 2 to 6 Hours 2 to 6 Hours
Likelihood to Recommend to Potential Customers
More Likely Moderately Likely Less Likely
Sales Collateral PreferredLive and Virtual Demos
Case StudiesLive and Virtual Demos
Software TrialsLive and Virtual Demos
Software Trials
DECISION-MAKER CHARACTERISTICS
Source: CEB analysis.a Budget Size: High = More than $50 M; Mid = $20 M–$49 M; Low = Less than $49 M.
36© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
ROADMAP FOR THE PRESENTATION
Roles in Buying
Decisions
Buyer Profiles
Decision Maker
Characteristics
Effective Tactics
37© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
Project # xxxxxx
Catalog # CCC5802816SYN
Year Range xxxx–xxxx
Project # xxxxxx
Catalog # CCC166544PR
Year Range xxxx–xxxx
SEVEN TYPES OF CUSTOMER STAKEHOLDERS
Source: CEB analysis.
Go-Getter Skeptic Friend
STOP
BlockerClimberGuideTeacher
Focused on organizational
improvement and prone to champion new ideas and their
implementation
Effective at rallying others to action, but
weak on process management
Willing to share information
unavailable to others to demonstrate credibility
and status
Focused largely on personal advancement
irrespective of organizational success
Strongly oriented toward the status quo and generally averse
to change
Open to new ideas, but moves forward
cautiously after much deliberation
Receptive to supplier meetings and willing to network reps with
colleagues
38© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
Project # xxxxxx
Catalog # CCC5802816SYN
Year Range xxxx–xxxx
Project # xxxxxx
Catalog # CCC166544PR
Year Range xxxx–xxxx
MOBILIZER™ CUSTOMERS GET THE DEAL DONELi
kelih
oo
d t
o D
rive
Org
aniz
atio
nal A
ctio
n
Highly Likely
Highly Unlikely
The Go-Getter
1.00x
The Teacher
0.89x
The Skeptic
0.66x
The Guide
0.23x
The Friend
(0.20)x
The Climber
(0.22)x
The Blocker
(0.95)x
“Mobilizers” “Talkers”
n = 717.Source: CEB analysis.
Note: Respondents were tested on their likelihood and ability to initiate change and drive agreement in their organization around complex purchases and changes.
Individual customers who fit the mobilizer profile are much more likely than others to push their buying group towards a consensus purchase decision if they are properly engaged.
39© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
HOW TO FIND THE MOBILIZERS™
Do they prioritize the organization (“we”) or themselves (“me”)?
Do they speak about facts or share opinions?
Verify Mobilizers by requesting they conduct research or tasks, or suggest next steps to you.
Do they share useful information?
Commercial Teaching
2a. Interested in Greater Good 2b.
3. Communication Style
4. Next Steps
Lead with Thought-Provoking InsightIf engaged, do they ask challenging,
thought-provoking questions?
1. Healthy Skepticism
Yes
“WE” “ME”
NOYES
STORIES AND OPINIONS
FACTS AND TASKS
NO
STOP
BlockerGuideFriendClimberTeacherSkepticGo-Getter
Use for information, but not to drive action.
Source: CEB analysis.
Project # xxxxxx
Catalog # SEC0313111SYN
Year Range xxxx–xxxx
40© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
IMPLICATIONS FOR VENDORS
■ As the size of the decision making team increases, a wider variety of businessroles become involved. Understand the agenda of each role and preparemessaging that resonates with the goals and objectives of each department.
■ Larger decision making teams are more likely at larger firms or with projectsthat have a widespread impact and bigger budget. Map relationships andcreate profiles for each of your customer contacts to better understand thetrue decision makers and influencers.
■ Slight influencers are more likely to appreciate the significant commitment oftechnology buying decisions, whereas decision makers and heavy influencersare more likely to think it is easy to change suppliers.
■ Influencers say they are more willing to pay a premium than the actual decisionmakers. As you are likely communicating with influencers, be aware that theirbosses are looking to pay market price or a modest premium.
Source: CEB analysis.
41© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
28-July-2016
EFFECTIVE TACTICS IN FINANCIAL SERVICES SALES
Gather Information
Tailor Messaging
Target Decision Makers
■ Understand your firm’s prior relationship with the prospect, if any.
■ Map decision makers and influencers to follow their roles within the companyand their relationships to one another.
■ Focus on a refined, targeted story specific to a decision makers‘ prioritiesrather than dense marketing collateral that includes all of a solutions’ benefits.
■ Encourage collaboration between sales, pre-sales, and marketing to createmessaging building blocks configurable based on decision maker type.
Identify who the top decision makers and influencers at each stage (RFP, shortlist and final choice) will be and determine their customer type.
Source: CEB analysis.
43
FULL CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE VENDOR EVALUATION CRITERIA
Attribute Criteria Evaluation PointsRaw Score Raw ScoreVendor A Vendor B
1. Strategic andCorporate Fit
Vendor’s vision, values, and mission
Vision statements, strategic goals, and objectives
History Years in businessOrganization structure and profile
Organization chart; management team
Client profile Key clients, segments, and industriesIndustry recognition Industry awardsLegal Pending legal disputes; legal dispute
historyThought leadership Examples of proactive solutionsFocus on ethics Enforcement of ethics in the organizationProtecting clients’ IP Processes in place to protect clients’ IP
rightsGrowth strategy Plans for future growth (market
segments, services, etc.)Key services and differentiators
Unique features, products, or services
Profitability and financial management
Viability of the business; auditor information
Sources of revenue Revenue by geographies, businesses units, products, and services
Location Locations of contact centers and ease of travel to sites
Attribute Average
© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
FULL CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE VENDOR EVALUATION CRITERIA (CONTINUED)
Attribute Criteria Evaluation PointsRaw Score Raw ScoreVendor A Vendor B
2. Engagement GovernanceModel
Governance model Description of governance models used for similar engagements
Benefits of the model Derived benefitsTrack record Client case studies with emphasis on
similar activities and geographiesCustomer experience profile
Sample profiles of what entails relevant customer experience activities
Attribute Average
3. Cost Benefits Pricing models Experience with various pricing models—per agent hour, risk reward models, etc.
Ability to deliver cost benefits
Structural advantages that allow it to achieve lower costs
Flexibility Innovative pricing models
Attribute Average
© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR
44
FULL CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE VENDOR EVALUATION CRITERIA (CONTINUED)
Attribute Criteria Evaluation PointsRaw Score Raw ScoreVendor A Vendor B
4. Technology Resource profile Access to technology experts
Technology integration Compatibility with our systems and integration experience
Technology road map Approach toward institutionalizing new technologies
Technology Licensing Access to updates licenses
Technology Advice Expert advice available
Troubleshooting Access to technology helpdesk
Technology road map Approach toward institutionalizing new technologies
Attribute Average
5. Infrastructure Vendor Customer Service
Vendor competency at addressing technology/ software issues
Communication infrastructure
Communication infrastructure details (Internet connections, firewalls, e-mail, video teleconferencing,telecommunications, etc.)
Network infrastructure Details including, network redundancy
Security procedures Security processes in place (physical security at contact center, card-based access, etc.)
Business continuity plan Business continuity and disaster recovery plan. Is it certified by a third-party auditor?
Attribute Average
© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR 45
FULL CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE VENDOR EVALUATION CRITERIA (CONTINUED)
Attribute Criteria Evaluation PointsRaw Score Raw ScoreVendor A Vendor B
6. Process Maturity
Knowledge transition Methodology for knowledge transfer, training, etc.
Demonstrated benefits Measured benefits of quality processes and customer benefits
Approach to metrics Approach to metrics collection; monitoring and reporting mechanisms
Escalation procedures Escalation procedure definition
Communication List of communication mechanisms
Attribute Average
7. Culture Change management What is the approach toward change management?
Work culture Description of the organization’s work culture
Cross cultural adaptability
How does the vendor impart cross-cultural adaptation?
Attribute Average
© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR 46
FULL CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE VENDOR EVALUATION CRITERIA (CONTINUED)
Attribute Criteria Evaluation PointsRaw Score Raw ScoreVendor A Vendor B
8. Customer Satisfaction
Processes used Steps enforced by the vendor to ensure customer satisfaction
Third-party feedback/survey results
Analyze reports for the past several years
Repeat business Repeat business as a percentage of annual revenues for past years
Referrals Current customers and recent customer departures
Attribute Average
© 2011–2016 CEB. All rights reserved. TGEV167035PR 47