CEFPI- NTX2011-2012 Board

Lisa LamkinPresident

Rod Reeves Vice President

Mark Vander VoortProgram Director

Srinath KasturiTreasuruer

Patrick GlennSecretary

Bruce McNabbMembership Coord

Larry WilliamsAt-Large

Ray StringerAt-Large

Richard Flores,Past President

Lunch Sponsor:Satterfield & PontikesConstruction, Inc.

Kathlyn Joy Gilliam Collegiate Academy, DISDDesign and Tours by: SHW Group

CEFPI – NTX Please Join Us at our Wednesday Luncheon Meeting - February 15, 2012; 11:30 AM at the Kathlyn Joy Gilliam Academy, DISD, 1700 E. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75241

RSVP at cefpi.org

Guest Speaker: Brian Orr, PE, Structural EngineerToff Associates, Springfield , MissouriExpert on Safe Room Construction

Guest Speaker & Program:Brian Orr, PE , Safe Room Expert

If Disaster Strikes… •Lessons from the Joplin Tornado•The Importance of Safe Rooms•What a Safe Room Can Be and Ways to Fund Them

CEFPI NORTH TEXAS CHAPTER MEETING

January 18, 2012Performing Arts Center

Allen ISD

TEXO/CEFPI TASK FORCE PRESENTATION

January 18, 2012Performing Arts Center

Allen ISD

Agenda

1. Introductions2. Committee Overview and

Mission3. First Charge

1. Sub-committee creation4. Sub- Committee Reports5. Next Steps6. Questions

7. Performing Arts Center Tour

Introductions

• Lisa Vardeman, AIA, REFPPartner, VLK Architects

•Ray Stringer, Project ArchitectArmko

•Irene Nigaglioni, AIA, REFPPartner, PBK

•Bob Marwill,Sr. Director, Satterfield Pontikes

•Raleigh Roussell, President and CEO

TEXO

Committee Overview and Mission

Mission Statement

The purpose of the TEXO/CEFPI DFW Joint Committee is to identify and

address issues affecting regional K-12 school construction.

First Charge

Subcommittee Creation

Surveyed members for topics that were relevant and that merited further

investigation.

• Classroom of the Future• Cost Outlook• Lifecycle Costs• BIM• Better Built Buildings• Building Envelope• Legislative Issues

Subcommittee Reports

LEGISLATIVE ISSUES

Legislative Issues

JOINT CEFPI – TEXO TASKFORCELEGISLATIVE SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS

Glenn Anderson, Turner Construction

Russ Garrison, Sedalco Construction

Terry Hoyle, SHW Group

Scott Layne, Irving ISD

Susan Smith, Corgan Associates

Leesa Vardeman, VLK Architects

Lathan Watts, TEXO

Larry Williams, Lewisville ISD

Construction Industry

Architectural Industry

School Districts

Legislative Issues

Discuss and track current legislative issues introduced in the Texas 82(R) Legislative Session

Identify legislative issues that would be of interest to CEFPI and TEXO organizations for future development

Update fellow members on legislative activities

Become activists with our State Representatives in promoting organization’s common goals and educating them on our concerns

GOALS & OBJECTIVES

Legislative Issues

We identified and tracked the following Bill Subjects through www.capitol.state.tx.us

• ARCHITECTS & ARCHITECTURE (S0026)• CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING MATERIALS (S0106)• EDUCATION--PRIMARY & SECONDARY--CLASS SIZE (S0232)• Education--Primary & Secondary--Facilities (I0241)• Energy--Conservation (I0317)

Developed a better understanding of the legislative process

Became more politically active by voicing our support or concerns individually with our Representatives 

DISCUSS & TRACK CURRENT ISSUES

Legislative Issues

DISCUSS & TRACK CURRENT ISSUES

Legislative Issues

Amendments to the 50 Cent Debt Test

Class Size Restriction Relief

Unfunded Mandates 

DISCUSS & TRACK CURRENT ISSUES

Legislative Issues

Developed a Posterous blog to push out real time information to subscribers

Maintain a historical reference for relevant legislative matters to our organizations

These references would be factual in nature without our committee’s personal biases

 

UPDATE MEMBERS ON LEGISLATIVE ISSUES

Legislative Issues

UPDATE MEMBERS ON LEGISLATIVE ISSUES

Legislative Issues

Most members are not political activists and are out of practice with the political process

Our members are leaders in our respective industries and have the power to have a collective voice

We firmly believe that well-planned, designed and constructed educational facilities are healthy, relevant and energy efficient and benefit students’ performance and society in general

 

BECOME POLITICAL ACTIVISTS

Legislative Issues

Let us know what is important to you

Better yet, join us

Share the blog with your peers, clients and associates:http://cefpi-texo.posterous.com/

 

FUTURE WORK

Subcommittee Reports

COST TRENDS

Cost Trends

JOINT CEFPI – TEXO TASKFORCECOST OUTLOOK SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS

Scott Liston, A&P

Bruce Helm, Balfour Beatty

Irene Nigaglioni, PBK

Lathan Watts, TEXO

Raleigh Roussell, TEXO

Bob Marwill, Satterfield and Pontikes

Construction Industry

Architectural Industry

Cost Trends

Goal of the subcommittee

To identify factors affecting school construction, and to provide data to assist school districts

in planning for future facilities.

Cost Trends

COST OF SCHOOLS

Cost Trends

Summary Conclusions from SurveyCMAR Projects in 2011 – Compared to

2010• Cost of Elem Schools …….. +12.3% • Cost of Middle Schools ….. +10.3%• Cost of High Schools …….. +11.2%

CSP Projects in 2011 – Compared to 2010

• Cost of Elem. Schools ……… +6.8% • Cost of Middle Schools …….. -3.9%• Cost of High Schools ……….. -5.0%

Cost Trends

Trends

• Sharp increase in cost (10% - 12%) of Elem. & Middle Schools for 2nd year in a row (since 2009)

• Sharp increase in cost (11%) of High schools this year, after decreases in 2009 & 2010

• Sampling illustrates lower Cost / S.F. of CSP, compared to CMAR

Cost TrendsCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY COST INDICATORS

(McGraw-Hill /ENR-Dec., 2011)Cost Indexes by City – % Change in last year

Construction Cost Building Cost Materials Cost

20 City Avg. +2.5% +2.9% +4.8%Baltimore +4.0% +4.4%

+6.2% (Highest)Birmingham +9.6% (Highest) +2.5%+5.2%Boston +3.6% +3.1%+6.0%Dallas +0.6% (Lowest) +3.0%+1.8% (Lowest)Denver +7.7% +1.7%

+4.0%New York City+3.0% +3.5%+4.6%Pittsburgh +3.4% +5.3% (Highest)+3.3%San Francisco +0.8% +1.4% (Lowest)+4.9%

Subcommittee Reports

LIFECYCLE COSTS

Lifecycle Costs

JOINT CEFPI – TEXO TASKFORCELIFE CYCLE COSTS SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS

Craig Reynolds, BRW Architects

Phil Jimerson, Grapevine Colleyville ISD

Eric Hahnfeld, HHS Architects

Irene Nigaglioni, PBK

Don Penn, IEG

Lathan Watts, TEXO

Jordan Dial, Lee Lewis

Barb Von Der Heydt, Fort Worth ISD

Construction Industry

Architectural Industry

School Districts

Lifecycle Costs

Goal of the subcommittee

To develop a matrix of building components and systems that are typically used in educational facilities, that will include

costs and life expectancies, as well as recommendations for best use.

BUILDING SYSTEMSROOF

PAVING

GLAZING

LIGHTING

AIR CONDITIONING

FLOORING

Lifecycle Costs

Lifecycle Costs

Dated: December 2011

Available at www.cefpi.org under North Texas Chapter

Lifecycle Costs

•The goal of this document is to provide information to school districts that are making purchasing decisions on major school building components and equipment.

•Decisions on equipment and building components should be made by analyzing both initial costs with long term costs, as well as with a good understanding of service and maintenance potential.

GOAL OF REPORT

Lifecycle Costs

•This document is a starting point when considering a major purchase.

•School Districts are encouraged to consult with the appropriate design consultant prior to making the decision.

GOAL OF REPORT

Lifecycle Costs

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

Selection of system type typically is driven by prior experience and costs. With the advent of LEED, adoption of Energy Codes and media driven exposure, the use of the more renewable technologies are being explored. Systems that do not evaporate water and do not require water treatment chemicals are becoming more popular. Life Cycle costs are becoming more prevalent in decision making process.

SUMMARY SHEET

Lifecycle Costs

MATRIX

Lifecycle Costs

MATRIX COMPONENT

CSI DIVISION (Old and New)DESCRIPTION

INITIAL COSTNew ConstructionRenovation/Replacement

LONG TERM COSTSReasoningFrequencyXX Year Lifecycle Costs

LIFE EXPECTANCY

APPLICATIONSBenefitsChallenges

REMARKS

Lifecycle Costs

MATRIX COMPONENT – Rooftop Package DX Units

CSI DIVISION (Old and New) – 15783/23 7400

DESCRIPTION – Min Eff RTU’s

INITIAL COSTNew Construction - $14.17/SFRenovation/Replacement -

$12.50/SF

Lifecycle Costs

MATRIX

LONG TERM COSTS - $0.60/SFReasoning - MaintenanceFrequency - Annually30 Year Lifecycle Costs -

$60.67/SF

LIFE EXPECTANCY – 15 years

Lifecycle Costs

MATRIX

APPLICATIONSBenefits – Energy Consumption at

point of UseChallenges – Multiple large roof

penetrations

REMARKS – Simple System; Cost for Replacement included

at Year 15

Identify other building components and systems

Support new sub-committee that developed from this one

Renewable Energies – Don Penn

Review other costs and possible recommendations for savings on the M&O side

FUTURE WORK

Lifecycle Costs

Subcommittee Reports

BUILDING ENVELOPE

Building Envelope

JOINT CEFPI – TEXO TASKFORCEBUILDING ENVELOPE SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS

Ray Stringer, Armko

Cecil Cypert, Frisco ISD

Shawn LeCrone, PBK

Gary Rademacher, Huckabee

Doug Workman, Hunt Construction

Lathan Watts, TEXO

Construction Industry

Architectural Industry

School Districts

Building Envelope From Design to Construction

A Best Practices Guide

OWNER – DESIGNER/ARCHITECT – CONSULTANTS - CONTRACTOR

Building Envelope

•PLAGUES OF A BUILDING OWNER• Disturbance of the interior space.•Destruction of existing building materials•Development of health issues•Loss of time of space during remediation•Loss of money due to staff relocation•Reputation-perception of an issue

Building Envelope

SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION TEAM

OWNEOWNERR

ARCHITECARCHITECTT

CONTRACTOCONTRACTORR

CONSTRUCTIOCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSN DOCUMENTS

BUILDING ENVELOPEBUILDING ENVELOPE

ENVELOPE ENVELOPE CONSULTANTCONSULTANT

PEER PEER REVIEWREVIEW PRICE OUT JOB CONSTRUCTIONPRICE OUT JOB CONSTRUCTION

INITIATE PROPOSAL PROCESSINITIATE PROPOSAL PROCESS

SELECTION OF SUBSSELECTION OF SUBS

ACTUAL CONSTRUCTIONACTUAL CONSTRUCTION

OWNEOWNERR

Building Envelope

The Building Envelope - Best Practices•SUBCONTRACTOR INPUT

• What are the most prevalent issues associated with waterproofing related to your trade.•What would be most beneficial to you with regard to the design documents?• What can the GC do to improve the construction process?

ROOFING

WATERPOOFING

MASONRY

GLAZING

PLASTER

•SPECIFIC CASE STUDIES• DESIGNATE THE CONSTRUCTION/DESIGN ISSUE!•IDENTIFY WHAT IS POSSIBLY CAUSING THE PROBLEM?•WHAT IS THE PROPOSED SOLUTION TO SOLVING THE PROBLEM?

WALL LEAK

PROPOSED SOLUTION

Building Envelope

Next Steps

•Continue the work•Identify new topics for review•Sub-Committees continue work•Provide membership with relevant information

•We are recruiting!!•Next meeting: February 3 at 11:30am at TEXO•Contact:

irene.nigaglioni@pbk.comWayne.reynaud@pbk.com

Questions

Architecture | Engineering | Planning | Technology | Facility Consulting

New Performing Arts Center & Fine Arts Expansion/Repurposing

January 16, 2012

ALLEALLENNINDEPENDENT SCHOOL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTDISTRICT

Allen High School

Project SummaryProject Summary

•Performing Arts Center

•Student Commons

•Fine Arts Expansion

•Fine Arts Repurposing

Architectural Drawings Architectural Drawings

Floor Plan Level 1

Site

•Drop Off Area 1

•Entry Plaza 2

•Loading Dock 3

•Mechanical Yard 4

•Future Expansion 5

1

2

3

4

5

Architectural Drawings Architectural Drawings

Floor Plan Level 1

Student Commons

•10,000 s.f. multi-purpose

student commons space

Performing Arts Center

•1,500 seat Auditorium w/

Balcony

•Lobby and Gallery Space

•Backstage & Support Spaces

•Dressing Rooms 1

•Green Room 2

•Scene Shop 3

•Costume Shop 4

3

4

1

12

Architectural Drawings Architectural Drawings

Floor Plan Level 1

Fine Arts Expansion

•10,000 s.f. Band Hall 1

•Percussion Room 2

•Band Instrument Storage 3

•Dance, Drill Team and Color

Guard Locker Rooms 4

•Practice Rooms 5

•Mechanical Room 6

•Dressing Rooms 7

Fine Arts Repurposing

•Staff Office Repurposing 8

•Storage Room

Repurposing 9

4

1

3

2

5

5

6

7

8

7

9

Architectural Drawings Architectural Drawings

Floor Plan Level 3

Performing Arts Center

•500 Seat Balcony 1

•Side Balconies 2

•Video Room 3

Floor Plan Level 2

1

2

23

ImagesImages

CommonsEntry

ImagesImages

Grid IronStage Performance Hall

ImagesImages

Costume ShopBand Hall

ImagesImages

Gallery SpaceDressing Room Scene Shop

Architecture | Engineering | Planning | Technology | Facility Consulting

ALLEALLENNINDEPENDENT SCHOOL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTDISTRICT

Thank You!

CEFPI NORTH TEXAS CHAPTER MEETING

January 18, 2012Performing Arts Center

Allen ISD