challenges and perspectives - gacc midwest and maintenance (o&m) cost sums up to ~1/3 of wind...

23
Reliability and maintenance of wind turbines Challenges and perspectives Dr.-Ing. Katharina Fischer Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology www.exportinitiative.bmwi.de

Upload: dangxuyen

Post on 12-Mar-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Reliability and maintenance of wind turbines Challenges and perspectives

Dr.-Ing. Katharina Fischer

Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology

www.exportinitiative.bmwi.de

Outline

Fraunhofer IWES

Background: Cost of energy

Reliability

Maintenance

CMS and SHM

Conclusions

Status quo, challenges, trends

One of 66 Fraunhofer institutes in Germany,

approx. 500 employees

Fraunhofer: leading organization for applied

research in Europe

Strategic Alliance with ForWind and the

German Aerospace Center (DLR):

1/3 yields from

industry orders

1/3

public basic

funding

1/3

third-party

grants

Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology IWES

Research spectrum: Wind turbine as the

sum of dynamically interacting subsystems

Operation and Maintenance (O&M) cost sums up to ~1/3 of wind turbine life

cycle cost (LCC)

In addition: opportunity cost

due to unavailability

Reliability and availability are among the key factors for COE reduction

Influenced by: (a) Inherent reliability (b) Maintenance

Relevance of reliability and maintenance for the cost of energy

Large portion of O&M cost:

Maintenance cost

(service and repair)

Maintenance

Rent

Other

Operations

Insurance Offshore Onshore (new) Onshore (old)

O&

M c

os

t [€

ce

nt/

kW

h]

*1€ ~ 1.35 US$

So

urc

e: S

vo

bo

da

(2

01

3) *

Past: focus on gearbox

Present weak points according

to reliability study for variable-

speed wind turbines in the

RELIAWIND project

(2008-2011) & operators:

Electronical / electrical

components

Pitch system

(incl. pitch converters)

Root-causes / failure

mechanisms often unknown

Reliability of wind turbines:

Weak points

PITCH SYSTEM 23%

FREQUENCY CONVERTER

18%

YAW SYSTEM 7%

GENERATOR ASSEMBLY

11%

LV SWITCHGEAR 3%

GEARBOX ASSEMBLY

5%

SENSORS 4%

COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

4%

SAFETY CHAIN 2%

MV SWITCHGEAR 3%

TOWER 2% OTHER

18%

Downtime

Data source: RELIAWIND, Wilkinson et al. (2011)

PITCH SYSTEM 21%

FREQUENCY CONVERTER

13%

YAW SYSTEM 11%

GENERATOR ASSEMBLY

7% LV SWITCHGEAR

6%

GEARBOX ASSEMBLY

5%

SENSORS 4%

COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

4%

SAFETY CHAIN 4%

MV SWITCHGEAR 3%

TOWER 3%

OTHER 19%

Failure rates

CONFAIL study: two different wind-turbine models (DFIG, IG with full-power

converter) at offshore and onshore sites, ~150 turbines, low-voltage converters

Challenge: Frequency-converter failure

Root-Cause Analysis: Failure mechanisms and

causes, countermeasures

Failure-data analysis,

correlation with

environmental factors

Operating environment in

the field

Measurements on failed

modules, forensic analysis

So

urc

e: C

ON

FA

IL / C

ha

lme

rs / V

att

en

fall

/ IW

ES

Challenge: Frequency-converter failure (CONFAIL project)

Spatial and seasonal clustering of

failures observed

DFIG vs. Full power-converter

(FPC) turbines: FPC show highest

failure rates

DFIG

FPC

Significant correlation of converter failure

with nearby lightning

Forensic analysis:

high-voltage sparkover

So

urc

e: C

ON

FA

IL / C

ha

lme

rs / V

att

en

fall

/ IW

ES

No indications of the “classical”

converter reliability issues, i.e. bond-

wire or solder damage

„Foreign objects“

inside converter

cabinets in wind

turbines

Challenge: Frequency-converter failure (CONFAIL project)

So

urc

e: C

ON

FA

IL / C

ha

lme

rs / V

att

en

fall

/ IW

ES

Contamination with salt and

corrosion products on driver-board

R&D cluster on reliable power electronics for wind turbines

Project partners:

Fraunhofer IWES, Fraunhofer ISIT

4 universities

22 industry partners

Duration: 2013 – 2016 Budget: 8 M€

Research partners:

Industry partners: Project focus and objectives:

Improving reliability and availability of

frequency converters in wind turbines

Root-cause analysis, countermeasures for

existing and future turbines

System behaviour in dynamic operation

Condition monitoring for electronics

Fault-tolerant generator/converter concepts

Germany onshore: trend towards

low-wind turbines with high

rotor-generator-ratios

Drive train concepts of turbines

installed in Germany in 2012:

59% direct drive

41% geared drive

Generators:

global trend towards PMSG

Converters:

slow shift from low-voltage IGBT to medium-voltage IGCT technology

Technological trends

Data source: IWET

∅ Rotor diameter: 88m

∅ Hub height: 111m

∅ Nom. power: 2.4MW

New rotor concepts: avoid pitching of the complete

blade, react locally through deformable parts /

adjustable flaps (SMART BLADES project 2012-2016)

Predictive control based on LIDAR measurement of

approaching wind-field (LIDAR II project 2010-2013,

LIDAR-buoy 2011-2013, …)

Automated production of rotor blades: improved

quality at >10% reduced cost

(BLADEMAKER project 2012-2017)

Technological trends: R&D topics

So

urc

e: D

LR

, IW

ES

Improving reliability and accelerating time-to-market by realistic testing

Rotor Blade Test Hall up to 90 meters

Testing of design prior to series production

Simulation of 20 year life-spans in a few months

DyNaLab with 10 MW Drive Power

Testing of complete wind turbine nacelles

Assessment and optimization of turbine concepts

Shorter certification process

Support-Structure Test Center

Testing support structure fatigue behaviour

Soil-structure interaction

Operation and Maintenance (O&M) cost sums up to ~1/3 of wind turbine life

cycle cost (LCC)

In addition: opportunity cost

due to unavailability

Reliability and availability are among the key factors for COE reduction

Influenced by: (a) Inherent reliability (b) Maintenance

Relevance of reliability and maintenance for the cost of energy

Large portion of O&M cost:

Maintenance cost

(service and repair)

Maintenance

Rent

Other

Operations

Insurance Offshore Onshore (new) Onshore (old)

O&

M c

os

t [€

ce

nt/

kW

h]

*1€ ~ 1.35 US$

So

urc

e: S

vo

bo

da

(2

01

3) *

Maintenance

Corrective maintenance

Preventive maintenance

Pre-determined maintenance

Condition-based maintenance

Maintenance strategies

according to EN13306

Maintenance: Terminology

e.g.

Condition-monitoring

systems for the drive train

Oil sampling and analysis

for the gearbox

e.g.

Exchange of oil filters

Greasing of bearings

Retightening of bolts

“Run-to-failure”

strategy

Basic concept: use data-based mathematical models to determine the minimum of

direct costs: labor,

material, administration,… and

Indirect costs resulting

from imperfect

maintenance:

production loss, labor,

material, …

Consideration of complete life cycle

Examples:

Quantitative maintenance optimization

Co

st

Maintenance effort

Optimum levels of

maintenance effort and

cost Direct maintenance cost

Lost revenue due

to unavailability

Total cost

Economical assessment of

maintenance strategies

Interval optimization (e.g. time-

based replacement, inspections)

Maintenance scheduling

Maintenance logistics

Spare-part management

Prerequisite for tapping the cost-

reduction potential of quantitative

maintenance optimization

Standardization is crucial:

⟹ RDS-PP, ZEUS, GSP

Joint data pool (WinDPool) to

provide broad data basis

EVW II project (2010-2013):

standardization, implementation

of a RAMS/LCC database

Offshore-WMEP (2012-2015)

Importance of in-depth reliability and maintenance data

Source: IWES

Approx. 2/3 of all wind-turbine operators in

Germany have full-service contracts;

further trend towards full-service (→ prev. maint.)

Background:

Large portion of Enercon turbines

Operator / owner structure:

more than half of installed capacity in private

ownership, only ~10% owned by utilities

OEMs gain importance in the lucrative

maintenance business:

Maintenance market: Situation in Germany

Sources:

IWET, IWES

Market share of wind-turbine OEMs, based on

all turbines in operation in 2012

Service by

turbine OEMs Independent

or company-owned

service providers

Condition monitoring: Status quo

Situation in Germany:

Offshore: CMS requested by certification body

Onshore: CMS is optional but common practice at professional operators

Typical costs: ~11.000 US$ for CMS, <2000 US$/year for monitoring service

Status:

Established:

Not industrially available yet:

So

urc

es: W

ölfe

l, c

mc

Rotor bearing

Low-speed and high-speed shaft

Gearbox: gears and bearing

Generator bearings

• Vibration

monitoring

of

• Oil monitoring gearbox

Yaw bearing

Pitch bearing • CM for

Condition monitoring: Challenges, trends, new approaches

Innovative methods used in other industries not applicable in the complex and

highly dynamic drivetrains of wind turbines

Low rotational speeds (and trend towards even lower)

⟹ displacement measurements e.g. on low-speed bearings

Vibration monitoring of planetary gearboxes (often 2-3 pl. stages)

Subjective severity assessment

Limited detection certainty / false alarms

⟹ additional sources of condition information

⟹ R&D on data processing and diagnosis methods, and…

1st prognosis

2nd prognosis

3rd prognosis

Occurrence of failure

So

urc

es: B

rüe

l &

Kja

er,

Cha

lme

rs / I

WE

S

⟹ Quantitative CMS-based

prognosis of residual

component life

Trend in condition monitoring: Integration of SCADA and CMS

Supervisory control

(Nacelle)

Supervisory control

(Tower base)

Wind park network

So

urc

e: H

örin

g, 8

.2 (

20

13

)

Standard separate CMS:

Challenge: false alarms,

e.g. due to active yaw

Control-integrated CMS:

data acquisition in

un-disturbed states

⟹ earlier, enhanced-

certainty fault detection

at lower cost

Analysis software for both:

Rotor blades

Operational modal analysis

Vibration measurement

Laser

Passive thermography (R&D)

Acoustic emission (R&D)

Onshore foundations

Relative displacement

Offshore support structures and towers

R&D project

Structural Health Monitoring: Status quo, new approaches

Sources: Wölfel, Hermos, IAB, SKF,

Baumer, Bosch Rexroth, Wölfel,

IWES, PAC Samos, InfraTec

Reliability and maintenance are crucial factors for further cost-of-energy reduction

Reliability of electronic / electric components and pitch systems must be

improved ⟹ field-experience based root-cause analysis as starting point

Full-size testing for enhanced reliability and shorter time to market

Quantitative maintenance optimization: high cost-reduction potential,

but: joint standardized reliability and maintenance databases needed

Larger machines and investments: CMS and SHM are gaining importance,

integration with SCADA supports diagnosis and residual-life prognosis

Conclusions

Thank you very much for your attention.

Contact: [email protected], www.iwes.fraunhofer.de/en.html